On the ban of UKIP LGBT from London Pride


London Pride is an event I eagerly look forward to since I started residing in UK. For me, it represents freedom, a 10270791_910936968932361_6130231271874203855_nsafe place to make a loud political statement and have fun with LGBT families and allies.

Therefore, it was a shock when I checked the London Parade list for 27 June, 2015 and saw UKIP LGBT staring right back at me.  The UK Independence Party (UKIP) is widely known for its homophobia, biphobia, transphobia, xenophobia and blatant racism.  I was aghast that UKIP LGBT is going to be in that ‘safe and fun’ pride parade.

Considering how vocal UKIP leaders and members have been about condemning LGBT rights and actively seeking to work against LGBTs rights, this information came as a shock. In fact, my first reaction was “UKIP has an LGBT section for real?” I would have been surprised too if I saw ‘UKIP immigrants’ listed in a parade list for a rally organised by immigrants and allies to promote Immigrants’ rights.

I do have a problem believing that UKIP LGBT has a good motive for wanting to be part of the parade list. In fact, I would not be surprised if that section of UKIP was just hastily created for the purpose of pinkwashing and to launder the well-earned homophobic image of UKIP.

Under normal circumstances, I would not happily call for the ban of an organisation from participating in an event that was designed to promote human rights, acceptance, and tolerance just because i feel offended by what they have to say or what they stand for. However, there is certainly nothing normal about the sudden emergence of UKIP LGBT for parading in London Pride, if anything, it is highly suspicious. I totally support Free speech, but it should not be an umbrella to encourage Hate speech or any propaganda of such.

I was glad to sign an online petition calling for the ban of UKIP LGBT from marching at London Pride. The petition was clear that there were provisions in the Pride in London terms of participation that UKIP and what it stands for clearly contradicts.  The Pride in London website states:

Pride in London reserves the right to exclude from Pride in London events any organisation whose policies or leadership do not support the values of acceptance and inclusion that Pride promotes.

As the petition organiser rightly stated 

Nigel Farage, leader of UKIP, clearly does not support the values of acceptance that Pride promotes, and UKIP is an inherently homophobic, transphobic, xenophobic, racist and misogynistic political party.

It must be noted that far-right parties including the BNP and EDL are already banned from London Pride. However, Pride in London has not been consistent in implementing or enforcing its own guidelines. Therefore, it could be argued that the same policy is being used to mete out unequal treatment, especially when there are other political organisations marching in the parade who are not exactly shining example of human rights values that Pride extols.

One thing I can say in defence of such other organisations is that at least their LGBT sections are vocal about supporting LGBT rights and actively work towards changing the anti-LGBT policies, stance and sentiments within their organisations. Therefore, I would think they have earned their place in the Pride parade. However, same thing cannot be said of UKIP LGBT.

Following the outcry and the many signatures calling for UKIP LGBT to be banned from London Pride, Pride in London rescinded its decision to include UKIP in the parade. The Pride in London Committee issued a statement, part of which stated-

For this year we have reached the decision that UKIP’s application to join the Pride in London Parade, 27th June 2015, will be turned down.  This decision has been made after careful consultation in order to protect participants and ensure the event passes off safely and in the right spirit, it has not been made on a political basis.

While I welcome the ban of UKIP LGBT from the pride parade, I must say, I am not in agreement with the reasons cited by Pride in London for arriving at this decision. I think this is an issue where it is appropriate to take a stance on political ground. Pride might be fun and inclusive but actually, it is or at least supposed to be political. Citing ‘Can’t guarantee safety’ as a reason to ban anyone from taking part in a public event, is not good enough.

Peter Tatchell succinctly summed it up  in his article Should Ukip LGBT be banned from the Pride London parade?

I don’t believe the Ukip contingent would have been a threat to anyone in the parade, nor do I accept that “safety” is a legitimate reason for excluding them. This is the same lame excuse that has been used by the Russian authorities to ban Moscow Pride; namely that LGBT marchers would be at risk of violence by neo-Nazis and ultra-nationalists.

Ukip LGBT should not be banned because of the potentially violent reactions of their opponents. Penalising them because of the aggression of others is wrong and unfair. If there is a danger of assaults, the police have a duty to protect the likely victims. Simple.

The only genuine, serious grounds on which Ukip LGBT could be legitimately banned is that their politics conflict with the human rights values and policies of Pride London and the wider LGBT community.

It is my opinion that Pride in London was hasty in accepting the application of UKIP LGBT to join the parade. Pride article-2673299-1F36A93800000578-850_964x731in London could have avoided this debacle by consulting widely or by simply consulting its own guidelines and implementing it accordingly before issuing out pride parade permits.

Until the time when this so called ‘UKIPLGBT’ visibly uses its voice to call for LGBT rights, be actively seen to stand on the side of LGBTs, and make  visible efforts to change its party’s anti-lgbt stance, it should not be given a ticket to pinkwash and launder its image on the platform of the very people it seeks to oppress.

UKIP LGBT members are desperately trying to garner public sympathy by portraying themselves as the victims in this case. They have even threatened to gate crash the event. However, one must wonder if UKIP members understand what it means to be a victim, considering that their party actively seeks to continue to make the most vulnerable members of our society, victims.

It has been clearly stated that UKIP LGBT members are free to participate in the parade with other groups or as individuals; they just can’t do it under the banner of the monstrous UKIP.

However, I must say, as an immigrant and member of the LGBT community, I am glad that I wouldn’t be running into an officially endorsed UKIP banner at London Pride 2015.

SDC17336997995_710340022325587_651292922_n

Comments

  1. Meggamat says

    Ukip is an interesting party. On the one hand, they have centred the issue of UK independence, which will hopefully scare the EU into relaxing its iron grip upon Britain’s internal trade policies. On the other hand, if I was anything other than a white briton whose family has been in the UK for generations, I would be afraid to meet most of their members.

    UKIP’s claim to victim-hood in general has a point however. Given the percentage of votes they received, they really should have more parliamentary seats, but our democratic system favours older, more established political entities, often to an unfair degree.

    Irrespective, I hope you have a good time in London, and I hope that the world reaches a point where no political parties decide to discriminate against people for meaningless reasons.

  2. Yemisi Ilesanmi says

    @Meggamat I cant see how it is interesting that UKIP wants to “scare EU” into relaxing its grip on UK’s internal policies. UK was not forced, gagged, and dragged into the EU, it voluntarily joined and Britons have benefited from the union. You can’t eat your cake and have it. Ukip wants UK out of EU because it does not like the EU human rights policy and migration laws. There is nothing interesting about those appalling stance.

    On the other hand, if I was anything other than a white briton whose family has been in the UK for generations, I would be afraid to meet most of their members.

    As a black African woman and lgbt immigrant in Britain, “Afraid” is not the word i would use to describe how i feel about UKIP and its members. Words like disgusted, appalled, repulsed, nauseated, and revolted more clearly define how I feel about UKIp and its members. If I ever met UKIP members, it would be a task not to involuntarily puke all over them, cos that is how much I am nauseated by the thought that such racist, homophobic bigots exist in modern day society.

    BTW, thanks, i enjoyed London Pride (pics, video and post coming soon). I later learned that UKIP crashed the parade, luckily, i never came in contact with them and their horrible banner. 🙂

  3. Yemisi Ilesanmi says

    @Pen -- It is not surprising that they did not struggle to fill in the vacant LGBT post, what is actually surprising, to me at least, is that they have an LGBT section! Ridiculous! I wonder if it is like Religious LGBTs attending services to listen to their pastors and Imams tell them how they are going to burn in hell because of their sexual orientation and gender identity.

  4. Meggamat says

    @Yemisi Ilenanmi- I think that the EU’s human rights statutes and (most of) their immigration rules are fine, I just wish that they would relax their grip on our internal trade. If Brussels wants to regulate how we trade with other EU states or (to an extent) how we trade with nations outside the EU, fair enough. But let British merchants trade within our own borders however we like please! Only British Laws should regulate that trade.

    PS- did you hear? Our allies across the Atlantic have equality of marriage now!

Trackbacks

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *