Reviews- Freedom To Love For ALL: Homosexuality Is Not Un-African! »« LGBT Rights in Africa: Why we need international solidarity- Interview on SkyNews

Exhibiting Africans in a Human Zoo is not Art, it is Racist Voyeurism! Please sign this petition.

The Human Zoo exhibition ‘Exhibit B’ by white South African Brett Bailey is disgusting and dehumanising! As a black woman in the 21st century, my skin colour or body should not be on exhibition for the voyeuristic, closeted pleasure of racist privileged white people. My ancestors already suffered this humiliation, I should not have to watch it happen again under the pathetic excuse of “It is Art”.

If the people at the Barbican Centre cannot see why this is racist and dehumanising, they need to raise their social consciousness and awareness.

As for the artist, white South African Brett Bailey, I think he already knows that he is a racist asshole, afterall his reported use of the ‘N’ words testify to this.

It is not art, it is an outlet for him and his fellow racist, privileged white people to enjoy voyeuristic, closeted racist pleasure at the expense of black people, while they pretend to sympathise with what we suffered and still continue to suffer. Not In my name and not in my colour! Enough is enough!

jTkqnNRAgtOItre-556x313-noPad10556341_10152397746531775_2885251569189218787_n

This is a petition put up by Sara Myers, she has explained perfectly why this is a racist, dehumanising and patronising piece of shit not art.

Petitioning Sir Nicholas Kenyon

Withdraw the racist Exhibition “Exhibit B – The Human Zoo” from showing at the Barbican from 23rd-27th September

Petition by

Sar’z Myers

Birmingham, United Kingdom

A piece of work, ‘Exhibit B’, by the controversial white South African Brett Bailey is coming to the Barbican Centre in London this September. It is based on the 19th century phenomenon of the human zoo, in which African tribespeople were displayed for the entertainment of European and American audiences. One case describes the Congolese pygmy Ota Benga who, in 1906, was put on display at the Bronx zoo in New York alongside the apes and giraffes. They literally created human zoos at the expense of black people.

This piece of work by Bailey has been toured around Europe sparking protests and outrage by anti-racism campaigners. Now it is coming to London, and I’m calling on the Barbican not to display it.

I’m a Black African mother from Birmingham. I campaign and work with my community to try to breakdown the stereotypes that black people have to struggle against in society on a daily basis. I want my children to grow up in a world where the barbaric things that happened to their ancestors are a thing of the past. We have come a long way since the days of the grotesque human zoo – we should not be taking steps back now.

If Brett Bailey is trying to make a point about slavery this is not the way to do it. The irony gets lost and it’s not long before the people behind the cage begin to feel like animals trapped in a zoo. One of the actors in his piece said “How do you know we are not entertaining people the same way the human zoos did?”

Bailey himself sounds unsure as to the impact of this work. In an interview with the Guardian he says: “For all I know, I could look back at Exhibit B in 10 years and say, ‘Oh my God, I am doing exactly what they are accusing me of.”

Please join me in calling on the Barbican to withdraw the racist Exhibition “Exhibit B – The Human Zoo” from showing at the Barbican from 23rd-27th September.

 

The important letter you should sign:

To:

Sir Nicholas Kenyon, Jo Daly Executive Assistant to Sir Nicholas Kenyon (Barbican)

It has been brought to our attention by the Guardian newspaper on the 11th August “Edinburgh’s most controversial Show Exhibt B- The Human Show”, that the Third World Bunfight/ artist Brett Bailey’s Exhibit B, is due to be shown in the multi-cultural city of London from the 23rd-27th September at the Barbican.

We wish to register our utmost disgust at what we consider to be an outrageous act of complicit racism with the Barbican agreeing to the housing and display of this production. White South African Brett Bailey claims his human zoo vanity project is “art”; just how are we as Black African’s supposed to respond to this? We think the response of several of the participants in his project is telling. This is simply an exercise in white racial privilege – if it isn’t, then perhaps Bailey can explain why he didn’t use white people in his zoo. After all, wouldn’t him doing so be both more striking and send a clearer message?

The attempt to justify it, as Brett Bailey says, on the basis that it is ‘challenging’ and that “I’m creating a journey that’s embracing and immersive, in which you can be delighted and disturbed, but I’d like you to be disturbed more than anything.” is nothing more than that of a racist white man taking the opportunity given to him on the platform that the Barbican is providing to repaint a picture that puts Black African people back into a space which we are superficially encouraged to believe we have been ‘freed’ from.

We as Black African people, do not need to be reminded or re-brainwashed into thinking we are less than. To camouflage this assault behind the mask of a ‘respectable’ institution such as the Barbican is tantamount to mental terrorism. What Bailey and his ilk (disturbingly many of whom are black) are doing is cynically courting attention to generate attention, thus sales. And they are using black bodies and the bloody history of white supremacism to do so. None of these artists would dare confront, say, Muslims or Jews in this way, because they know the potential ramifications for them. But it seems Black African people, continue to remain fair game, just as we have been for centuries.

We would argue that The Barbican, by default, agrees with Brett Baileys statement; ‘What interests me about ¬human zoos is the way people were objectified. Once you objectify people, you can do the most terrible things to them’. The likes of Bailey and his apologists need to think about how it would feel if they had their ancestors and relatives caged in the name of art. Failing this, they should always expect to be seen and shown for what they are: smug, privileged cynics, exploiting Black African lives and history.

This is a statement of fact and when couched in the comfort of the Guardian newspaper it suggests intellectual validity however the rhetoric falls apart when it appears only Black African people can be occupiers of human zoos when in fact as another human, Sir Nicholas Kenyon, you should experience directly what it means to be in these human zoos. For this piece to be truly ‘challenging and disturbing” to those who originated and perpetrated these atrocities should be subjects in these human zoos, but that will not happen as it is all too evident that a white supremacist mind-set has come into play here.

We are deeply offended yet not surprised that the colonialism this piece purports to expose does nothing more than reinforce how effective it was and remains as a caging instrument of white supremacists. We charge the Barbican with exhibiting institutional racism for agreeing to stage this poison. We demand you reconsider your decision and choice of material and withdraw it from the programme. If you do not withdraw this exhibition from your programme we intend to protest outside the Barbican on the 23rd September 2014.

Sincerely,

[Your name]

I am appalled and disgusted by this exhibition and I hope you are too. Please take action, sign the petition and if possible contact the people at the Barbican Centre to register your disgust at their hosting of such dehumanising piece of vile work in the name of Art.

Petition link- https://www.change.org/p/sir-nicholas-kenyon-withdraw-the-racist-exhibition-exhibit-b-the-human-zoo-from-showing-at-the-barbican-from-23rd-27th-september 

10153680_10202799175242635_8911286330986830604_n10347400_10202797077630196_619586826612459033_n 10556341_10152397746531775_2885251569189218787_n

Comments

  1. smrnda says

    I expect a knee-jerk response about how this isn’t racist, but an *ironic commentary on racism* or something from the artist, but as a white artist, they should be listening to the reactions of Black people on this one. If it’s offending Black people it’s not working.

    It’s clearly done for nothing but shock value.

  2. Meggamat says

    Sure it is “art” but that is such a nebulous realm that anything could be called art. If he mounted a human corpse on a spike as a commentary on Walachian tyranny, that would also be “art”. It doesn’t automatically mean that anyone who disapproves is over-sensitive. Art, like religion is often used by people like this Brett Bailey to place their work above criticism. You can’t object, it is only art! You can’t question it, it is my faith!

  3. Yemisi Ilesanmi says

    @Meggamat -- Yes you can sign. I believe anyone, regardless of where they reside, can sign. Thanks,

  4. user454 says

    This is the history and legacy of black people. It is their story and their decision whether or not it is told and how it is told. A privileged white male, who grew up in apartheid South Africa has no right to tell this story, especially if it does not have the support of the people it mostly affects: black people. It is unsurprising that this terrible idea has come from a white man, of a country who did not abolish apartheid until 1991. I guess now that apartheid is over, he needs to find an alternative way to exploit black people in order to get ahead. This exhibit truly disgusts me. It reminds me of the South African woman, Sara Baartman, who was sold into slavery,exhibited in the nude around Europe, and whose brain and outer sex organs were displayed in a French Museum until 1974. This whole exhibit just sounds like a white man trying to further his career by continuing the exploitation of black people. In 2014, black people should not have to see themselves shown in this awful way. This is the history and legacy of black people and if they do not support this exhibit it should not be shown.

  5. says

    If Brett Bailey and the Barbican really wanted to draw attention to the traumatic legacies of colonial violence, then they would (and should) have considered working with black-led organisations such as FLT (Fondation Lilian Thuram: Éducation Contre le Racisme) and experts (esp. scholars from within the African and Caribbean diasporas) on critical ‘race’ theory, colonial histories, sociologies of ‘race’ and racism, histories of imperialist exhibiting, etc. to present an accurately researched anti-racist exhibition about ‘human zoos’ (sensitively curated, in consideration of the needs of diverse, multi-racial prospective visiting audiences) from which everyone could obtain insights – as the Quai Branly Museum in Paris sought to do when it collaborated with Lilian Thuram on the Paris-based exhibition, ‘Human Zoos/Zoos Humains: L’Invention du Sauvage’ ( 2012). Whilst I am aware that the Quai Branly’s staging of the artefact and archive-based ‘Human Zoos/Zoos Humains’ exhibition also had several major flaws, at least its overall approach was anti-racist instead of simply being sensationalist, and most certainly did not feature provocatively dehumanizing, racialised, ‘live performance’ tableaux. I have written a more detailed response to the proposed display of ‘Exhibit B’ on my blog, signed the petition initiated by Sara Myers, and I thank Yemisi Ilesanmi for providing a wider forum for this important issue: http://museumgeographies.wordpress.com/2014/08/24/exhibit-b-a-poignant-performance-art-piece-or-just-the-latest-incarnation-of-a-racist-human-zoo/

Trackbacks

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>