If any of you want a demonstration of willful ignorance, check out this article on transgender athletes:
But plenty of other prominent athletic leagues have instituted policies for allowing transgender athletes to compete with others have the same gender, including the NCAA and the Olympics. Both simply require that athletes have undergone at least one year of hormone replacement therapy. That’s because it’s the hormones that matter, and research has shown that trans athletes lose any competitive advantage they might have had after hormones begin to make changes to their bodies, such as to their muscle mass. A recent studyspecifically confirmed this result in transgender runners.
The author of the piece helpfully points out a number of factors that challenge the exclusion of trans folk in competing in gender segregated sports.
- Literally any physical attribute which contributes to fitness in sports can be possessed by both AFABs or AMABs–cited in the article is the example of a 6’7″ AFAB cis woman competing in basketball having an edge over her competitors, just as any other 6’7″ competitor would;
- The more malleable facets of fitness, like muscle mass/tone, are governed by sex hormones–in this respect, trans and cis athletes are nearly identical (trans women in fact have lower testosterone than cis women);
- Bio sex is a blurry concept when you look closely under the microscope, and setting precedents for policing trans bodies will inevitably bleed into policing uncommon phenotypes in cis bodies–even if the sex hormones are still in the typical range otherwise.
All of these have citations in the author’s article. You can fact-check the claims.
Despite this, transphobic commentators make the exact same arguments that were just refuted in the article.
How do you get through to someone like this? I can’t even.
“I can prove gravity is an attractive force by dropping this pencil. See? It falls to the Earth.”
“No it doesn’t! It clearly just floated into the sky!”
Sure makes you rethink that painfully stubborn “activists against science” trope, no? Who, exactly, is denying science here?