Lies National Geographic Told Me: Trieste


This is part of a short series that I will try to drop over the course of the year. I grew up reading National Geographic and it wasn’t until I was well into my adulthood that I discovered that I had been absorbing subtle doses of propaganda along with the cool stuff that excited and inspired me. While you’re reading about this one, you may be thinking “What about PROJECT JENNIFER?!” and, if you are, don’t worry – I’ll get to that one eventually, too.

I was captivated by the pictures they brought back from the deep trenches; the anglerfish, the skeletal long fish that looked like a life-support system for a set of crystal teeth, the vents that may be our distant ancestral homes. Exploring inner space, the deep frontier – I remember 1934 issues of National Geographic featuring pictures of Beebe and Barton, who pioneered the modern “stainless steel cannonball” design of bathysphere. Beebe’s design had a problem, that it was completely tethered to the ship above it, and it couldn’t move around. That turned out to be highly relevant. And, in the 1970s there was the Johnson Sea Link submersible disaster, in which a submersible got caught in wreckage and two of its crew suffocated; that was newsworthy and dramatic and I read about it in the newspapers that summer, while I breathed the plentiful clear air of Southern France in June. [wik]

Trieste loading onto a ship in Guam harbor, 1960

Then there was Trieste.

Trieste was a bathysphere suspended below a gigantic gasoline-tank to provide bouyancy – a brilliant safety design because the gasoline couldn’t compress any further, yet was lighter than water; they didn’t have to keep the pressure from collapsing the tank. The submersible carried some sandbags that could be dropped to re-balance it to rise. Basically, it was a hot air balloon design that worked in water, and it was theoretically capable of surviving to any depth that humans thought oceans extended to.

Trieste was commissioned in 1958 (note of order, the CORONA spy satellite program started officially in 1959) In 1960, Trieste made the deepest dive in history. [nat geo] All the way down Challenger Deep: 36,000ft (11,000m) below the surface.

The Navy had bought the Trieste in 1958, not to set a world’s record, but as a scientific platform. It was carefully evaluated during the summer of ’57 by a group of ocean researchers: A biologist, an acoustics guy, a geological oceanographer. They chartered it to see if such a platform would be useful for naval research and decided, yeah, having the trained mind and trained eye right at a deep-sea work site would be ideal.

Admiral Arleigh Burke finally, tentatively, approved it, but conditionally: There would be no publicity. If you come back, we’ll publicize it, he said. But if you don’t, no one will know about it. Satellite launches were failing, there was lots of publicity, and it was embarrassing. He didn’t want more of that.

The satellite launches that were failing: those were CORONA spy satellites.

By 1971, the CORONA satellites had evolved to the vastly more capable HEXAGON (KH-9) system, which sported twin cameras so the photo interpreter could see in 3D. HEXAGON still used the CORONA technique of dropping a “bucket” full of film that was snagged in descent by an airplane towing a wire loop. [stderr] By the time HEXAGON was flying, there was no longer any cover story regarding the satellite launches – the denizens of the world had become jaded by rockets and ballistic missile tests. The spy satellite program of the time was now deeply wedded to the ballistic missile program; HEXAGON flew up on TITAN-II boosters designed to deliver nuclear death.

Somewhere around the time when the Trieste had proved its function, another was built. Trieste II – which didn’t get as much news attention. Another deep diver, Alvin, was being developed too, that was more mobile and had gripper arms that could be used for “sampling” – National Geographic covered Alvin too. [ng] Stories about Alvin and her unnamed sister-ship aren’t declassified yet but most likely she was used to lay the SOSUS [wik] line of submarine-tracking sono-sensors that listen for Soviet attack subs and missile boats. SOSUS went live in 1961; the timing of all these things is a bit of a giveaway. There was another mystery-ship built around that time, which carried the first full-featured side-scanning radar; it was capable of resolving incredibly accurate pictures of the ocean bottom. The side-scanning ship would virtually certainly have been able to easily find Titanic and other lost items but its descendants’ capabilities are still classified so the intelligence community would be reluctant to use the capability to find things like MH370.

Alvin; the picture was probably taken from its remotely piloted drone (was featured in National Geographic)

So, in 1972, when a HEXAGON payload was missed and landed in 16,400 feet of water (5,000 m) the Trieste II was secretly deployed to collect it. And collect it, it did:

Reel of film sitting on the bottom, 5km down from the surface. Orbit to bottom ocean, that’s quite a transition.

CIA reports: [cia via space.com]

But, all was not lost. The mission proved to be a valuable test of the Navy’s ability to carry out deep-sea recovery expeditions. In the report, CIA officials discussed some of the lessons learned, particularly from setbacks that were experienced on all three attempts.

“The third dive, the mechanical arm failed to work, almost preventing operation of the recovery device,” the report said. “The on-board computer has never worked. Much more attention is required to the use of high reliability parts and extensive subsystem testing to assure confidence in any given operation.”

The deep sea capabilities of the US have been a closely guarded secret for a very long time, since one never knows when something might come in handy. There’s a story (that hasn’t been declassified enough to write about, yet) that a certain Soviet submarine sank with a complement of nuclear weapons on board; when the Soviets later mounted a recovery effort they were nonplussed to discover that something had cut the ship apart enough to remove at least one warhead. I’ll bet that something was Alvin‘s classified sister-ship; think what an amazing story some smallish crew of people have been keeping secret for 30+ years. I don’t think the words “nautical adventure” begin to cover being miles under water in the dark, in a refrigerator-sized chamber with another person for days using little waldoes to torch apart a ballistic missile submarine to harvest Shiva The Destroyer’s eggs and bring them back to the surface.

------ divider ------

Back, before I got more strident about my views regarding intelligence and secrecy, I had a friend who was an intelligence officer at CIA. Once time, for fun, I tried to feel him up a bit about JENNIFER, by asking “what happens when there’s an accident on a mission like that?” He said, “we call it a training accident and someone gets a visit and a letter.” And that was that. It could be, a truck backed up over you, or it could be you got shot by a militia somewhere, or it could be you ran out of air 2 miles down, in the silent dark.

I am not saying that the intelligence community shouldn’t do these things. Nor am I saying that National Geographic is wrong for acting as a cover for intelligence operations. It’s my opinion, however, that a great deal of this stuff could be done much more openly, with much less secrecy. It probably wouldn’t really matter, and the thrilling exploration and amazing feats deserve to be applauded because they are flat-out legendary. Researching the new information about this story, I admit I was shocked to learn that Trieste‘s dive might have been kept secret if it failed. “Training accident.” Humanity has learned a great deal of valuable stuff as a byproduct of pointless nationalist pissing contests.

So, I heard a story once about white-knuckled system administration. It’s not my story so I don’t know if it’s true; I wasn’t there, etc. But it’s such a good story I’ll repeat it in spite of the caveats. Apparently this organization that was responsible for doing stuff with a ship a lot like Alvin used to have a weekly meeting for all the project leaders – I’ve been in those meetings – you know, the dreaded Monday morning “go around the room and everyone says what’s up” meeting. So as the meeting proceeds, it comes around to one system administrator who says “we pushed a new patch for the network interfaces on all the systems, and bounced them.” At which point one of the other project leaders jumps out of his chair, “did you patch IP address range xx.xx.xx.?” The systems admin says “yeah, wh-?” and halfway through the sentence the other team lead jumps across the table, grabs him around the throat, and starts choking the systems admin. Finally everyone pulls him off and calm is restored and the meeting is adjourned. The person who told me the story says, as the red-faced system admin was being escorted from the room, the project leader yelled, “those machines you just bricked are 2 miles down all over the !*#&! continental shelf and they all stopped responding last night. Can you drive a bathyscaphe?” Sounds like that was almost a training accident.

Comments

  1. says

    John Morales@#1:
    Charlie introduced a lot of people to Azorian/Jennifer, but in order to serve his story he had to leave out many insanely cool things. I’ll do a bit on it eventually; it’s hard to do it justice – an amazing story.

  2. kestrel says

    Oh. *smacks self in head*

    I remember reading about Alvin and being all excited about the research being done on deep sea critters… and I distinctly remember wondering how the scientists got the $$$ for that project. My father was a marine biologist so even as a child I realized it was not easy to get funding for stuff like that.

    What a naive dimwit I am… I never even thought.

  3. says

    kestrel@#3:
    I remember reading about Alvin and being all excited about the research being done on deep sea critters… and I distinctly remember wondering how the scientists got the $$$ for that project. My father was a marine biologist so even as a child I realized it was not easy to get funding for stuff like that.

    None of this is to say that there hasn’t been a great deal of good science done. So, I’m glad that there were scientists who tried to treat covert funding as if it were science research funding, and proceed anyway – there have been a lot of valuable technologies and techniques that have resulted from this sort of thing. It does bother me that the government’s preference is not to just conceal its agenda, but to lie about it constantly and fluently. If the people had known about HEXAGON, it would have mostly been “so what?” and actually, early satellite intelligence was probably an instrument of peace more than aggression (though if there had been an early-on nuclear war, American targeting would have been vastly superior and the war would have been very one-sided)(especially given that they also lied to us about the “bomber gap” and “missile gap”)

    It’s just lies, lies, lies.

  4. brucegee1962 says

    I don’t really mind that the cloak-and-dagger stuff is kept from the public for a while, because these stories kind of get better with age. There’s something ineffably cool about having the covers taken off of all this James Bond stuff that was going on in the 60s and 70s — it feels like having a time machine back to the earlier era to find out what was really going on.

    As long as it all does come out eventually — every secret should have a definite expiration date of no later than 30 years after the project ended, so there’s still time for historians to go around and interview some of the people who were there. Among all the other benefits, this kind of knowledge can be particularly good for debunking or confirming conspiracy theories — we need to know what real conspiracies look like, because then we can figure out whether a suspect conspiracy is likely to be real or phony.

  5. Pierce R. Butler says

    brucegee1962 @ # 5: … every secret should have a definite expiration date of no later than 30 years after the project ended…

    Real supersecret national security projects never end.

  6. DonDueed says

    Nat Geo also covered Glomar Explorer, as I recall. What was touted as a research vessel was, in fact, a ship designed and operated to recover a sunken Soviet nuclear sub.

    One secret undersea project that Nat Geo never publicized (or knew about?) was the Navy’s program to tap into Soviet undersea cables, as described in Blind Man’s Bluff.

  7. says

    DonDueed@#7:
    I’ll get to Glomar; that’s the prize nugget (AKA: AZORIAN or PROJECT JENNIFER)

    The murmansk tap also appeared in Nat Geo! It was well-hidden, though. I plan to cover that, too.

  8. xohjoh2n says

    Well, we *have* a 30 year rule, but it has exceptions. Which are basically that someone involved who has power might be a) prosecuted, b) lose their job (if they’re still working 30 years later) , c) be mildly embarrassed, or d) someone who covered for them at the time falls into the above three categories. Those conditions are described in law as “damage to the country’s image, national security or foreign relations”.

  9. says

    xohjoh2n@#10:
    (So much of the above sounds so very Red October…)

    There were a few conspiracy types who thought Clancy was telling stories about real incidents, but the “caterpillar drive” had already been developed at that time and wasn’t fast enough to make it practical (it only works on sonar and acoustic detection, not active radar) so everyone knew that it was merely a cool story. Definitely some of the underwater hijinks were inspired by various cat-and-mouse games US and USSR attack subs have been known to play.

    Well, we *have* a 30 year rule, but it has exceptions.

    Many of these programs tie together – you can’t talk about the HEXAGON until you’ve declassified CORONA and when you declassify the HEXAGON recovery then you just outed the Trieste. Trieste will appear again in these stories I plan to tell you.

Leave a Reply