Tech assistance, please: help me with mail!

I’ve finally had it with my mail software. I need advice on what I can do.

Here’s the situation: Mac OS X (that’s not going to change), the standard Mac Mail program, everything up-to-date with the latest versions. I’ve got about 20 folders set up in Mail, with filters to automatically redirect incoming mail to sensible places — student email gets top priority, for instance, a couple of listservs get their mail shuffled off to a convenient holding pen, mail from family members gets its own place, etc. Spam is currently not a problem; I’ve set up all my email accounts to forward through gmail, where the spam gets held up and eventually discarded, and I never even have to look at it.

I get a lot of email, even without spam. Every three months or so, I toss everything out of email and into a new OS folder just for archiving purposes, and reset everything to a mostly clean slate. It’s been a couple of months now, and I’ve got roughly 100,000 messages in Mail. I know. It’s unreal. Why all these people want to send me mail, I don’t know, but there it is.

Now here’s the problem: Mail can’t handle it. The software just gets slower and slower and s l o w e r, until, like now, it’s at the point where I get a message that I’ve got incoming mail, I click on the folder where it’s stored, and I can go fix a pot of coffee while Mail struggles and strains to just display the gorram list of messages. If I look at the processes, Mail is eating 80-90% of the CPU time for several minutes to show me one folder full of messages. And don’t tell me to just throw out all the accumulated mail: I’ve tried. I’m trying right now. I said to myself, OK, this folder with 10,000 messages in it? Goodbye. I selected all, hit delete, and waited — for two hours. Now it’s in Mail’s trash folder. I select “empty trash” and … wait another two hours.

Mac Mail is no good if you are trying to cope with a lot of email. It’s dead, dead, dead as far as I’m concerned. I’ve begun to actively hate Mail — it’s my daily enemy.

So someone tell me what nice, sensible GUI mail reader is out there for Mac OS X that is actually intelligent about managing large volumes. Gmail is nice, but I want something that will let me deal with mail offline.

Post it here, though. Please, please don’t email me suggestions, unless you really want to make me cry.

The Michael Egnor Report

Coturnix is organizing an informative google bomb — if you look up Michael Egnor on the web, what should you find? How about lots and lots of critics?

It seems only fair. Teach the controversy!


Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor
Michael Egnor


If the DI wants to use him as a nice figurehead, it seems like a good idea to make sure that any reporter doing some quick background on the guy discovers that he is not a reputable spokesman for evolution, no matter how estimable his record as a neurosurgeon may be.

With reluctance, me

So, Mike Haubrich stopped by my office yesterday, and during the conversation he mentioned that there was a video of me on the Seed site … with some trepidation, I took a look, and there it is: it’s my short presentation at the Inspiration Festival last fall. Ouch. I just cringe to see and hear myself, but in the spirit of being forthright and honest and exposing my flaws complete and without censorship, there I am. At least I really, really like developmental biology.

This is not an opening volley to trigger Atrios, the Editors, and TBogg to start hurling appalling YouTube videos across the net at each other. Or you, either.

Orr vs. Dennett/Dawkins

H. Allen Orr and Daniel Dennett are tearing into each other something fierce over at Edge, and it’s all over Orr’s dismissive review of Dawkins’ The God Delusion. It’s a bit splintery and sharp, but the core of Orr’s complaint, I think, is that he’s unimpressed with Dawkins’ ‘Ultimate 747’ argument, which is basically that postulating an immensely complicated being to explain the creation of an immensely complicated universe doesn’t actually explain anything and is self-refuting — if you need an intelligent superbeing to create anything complex, then the superbeing itself is an even greater problem for your explanation.

[Read more…]

Yes! There are new ads here!

In order to help pay for the tremendous amounts of bandwidth Pharyngula and its Sciblings are sucking off the internet, there are new video ads inserted below the first article on each page. They are a kind of visual noise, but they aren’t supposed to slow down access—they should only load significant quantities of data if you click on them. If you are experiencing technical difficulties, leave a message here and I’ll pass the word on to the tech people.

In case you’ve got got ad blocking software installed, I’ll mention that it is a movie for Dupont fire retardants that features a very chipper, slender blonde woman. Dupont saves lives with chemical, materials, and energy solutions. (That was much less painful than a fancy video ad, wasn’t it? I know, I’m not as pretty as Amanda Congdon … but I’m more sciencey).

The pirate’s life is not an easy one

i-c095d0eaeef58513b0e886eeb7afb55b-pirate_phase.gif

Clearly, the Hemelshots have a much more sophisticated relationship than we have. We’re flying the pirate flag outside of our house, but every time we try to move on to the full pirate phase, we run aground on the fact that she thinks she should be the Cap’n, and then there are the swordfights on the stairs and walking the plank and black spots and mutinous crew, and then Skatje stabs us both in the back and declares herself captain. The pirate lifestyle is not a mellow, casual one that encourages cooperation.

Turnabout, fair play, all that

We’re so accustomed to hearing about good Christian parents complaining about the material their kids are taught in science class, and lobbying school boards to ban the eeevilution word from the school, that it’s rather nice to see an example of the shoe on the other foot. A school in Sisters, Oregon (I know that place! Nice little town in the Cascades, east of Eugene) fired a teacher for peddling creationist bunkum.

[Read more…]

SFalopods

The Biology in Science Fiction blog has a short article on color-changing chromatophores in cephalopod skin, and asks for examples of biological adaptive camouflage used in SF stories — I want more. I want to know what SF novels have used cephalopods or cephalopod-like aliens as major characters or antagonists. There’s usually a tendency to make anything with tentacles the representative of evil in these stories, unfortunately.

Coulter drives a stake through irony’s heart

Ann Coulter is coming out with a new book: If Democrats Had Any Brains, They’d Be Republicans. I read Coulter’s last book, Godless, and I can tell you that having Ann Coulter call anyone else stupid is like seeing cockroaches complaining about vermin, or a pig farmer turning up their nose at someone else’s stink. It’s just not right.

Speaking of that Godless tripe, my challenge to her fans still stands. I still get email now and then from supporters whining that I dare to criticize her, but not one has ever plainly pointed to one single paragraph in the evolution chapters that they will stand up for as factually correct.