Well, this is a fine how-de-do. Clarence Thomas is arguing for theocracy.
Thomas, 77, the Court’s longest-serving conservative member, laid the blame at the feet of
intellectualsand the nation’s colleges and universities, which he said have allowed founding values tofall out of favor.He did not reference specific political figures or contemporary events.
He also did not reference specific values, but only platitudes. He simply took the time to condemn intellectuals, colleges, and universities — I guess he was corrupted by his time spent getting a JD from Yale.
Progressivism seeks to replace the basic premises of the Declaration of Independence and hence our form of government, Thomas said.
[It] holds that our rights and our dignities come not from God, but from government. It requires of the people a subservience and weakness incompatible with a Constitution premised on the transcendent origin of our rights.
Hang on there, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, do I need to explain to you that our form of government was specified by the Constitution, not the Declaration of Independence? That document was a dramatic announcement of our grievances and intent to sever our subservience with a colonial power, England. The Declaration does have some wording about “the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God” and that we are endowed by our Creator with certain inalienable rights, but it is otherwise a secular document focused on civil complaints and disagreements with a government. Officials do not swear to uphold the Declaration of Independence, which would be a weird thing to do, since a list of 18th century grievances is not relevant to a 21st century state.
It’s our Constitution you should care about. You know, the document that starts out
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
You know, the document that says our government comes from the people. Not god. It doesn’t even mention god or religion except in the first amendment, where it says “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” But now a Supreme Court Justice has decided that no, our rights come from a god, on the basis of reading the wrong document? And by ignoring entirely a wholly secular document that is the actual source of any authority he might have?
“Progressivism,” whatever that means in his decrepit brain, does not require subservience and weakness
, nor is it dependent on a transcendent origin of our rights
. Some of the founding fathers he reveres weren’t particularly religious and didn’t need a clerical excuse to see a reason for establishing a government. You can be an atheist and support the Constitution!
Thomas also took aim at officials in Washington, he said, who lack commitment to
righteous cause, to traditional morality, to national defense, to free enterprise, to religious piety or to the original meaning of the Constitution.
Yes, do take aim at government officials. I don’t think Donald Trump is at all pious, and is more committed to corruption than to free enterprise or righteousness, and he’s filled the upper levels of government with selfish hacks like himself. He’s also appointed several of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas’s peers. Any complaints should be rightfully directed at the institution he represents.
And hey, does taking bribes from wealthy conservatives count as a righteous cause?
Fuck your traditional morality, Clarence. It’s more like a traditional venality.











