Greetings, my friend, to the FUTURE!

We are all interested in the future, for that is where you and I are going to spend the rest of our lives. And here is a website that tells you everything that will happen…in the Future!

You may be excited to know that we have a specific date for the imminent demise of Christianity: 2240. It’s all based on this very scientific graph.

i-cd418934dd7ae1d261439bca9b306545-xtians_disappear-thumb-400x194-53071.jpeg

Yes, my friends, in the future we will be able to predict complex sociological phenomena from a short sample of data by fitting it to a straight line. We cannot do this today without gagging, but in the Future, it will be easy!

My friends, there is so much more. Before Christianity fades away so completely and so linearly, hunger and disease will be eradicated in 2200, you’ll be able to upload your mind to a computer in 2220, and you’ll be able to travel to nearby stars in your anti-matter fueled starship in 2230. Well-fed godless starfaring software minds for the win! For the Future!

Even greater wonders await us in 2300, when we become naked blue superhumans. In the FUUUUUUTUUUUUURE!

About that ad predicting the fall of Darwinism in 2013…

I know, I know already. We’re getting creationist and religious ads appearing on the right sidebar.

i-d9fab955235951e51e990b900ef20a98-badad.jpeg

Seed has farmed out some of their ad space to a generic ad provider, which doesn’t pay us much and which stuffs in ridiculous ads from any old desperate wanker who wants to buy some attention. In this particular case, I know the guy behind the ad: he was one of those obsessed cranks who, for a while, was sending me nagging emails every day demanding that I read his ReVoLuTiOnArY ThEoRy. I guess he got tired of the cold shoulder and decided to buy space on the web, a sure measure of exactly how much validity we should assign to his claims, i.e., none.

Anyway, I read his site so you don’t have to. Really, you don’t: these are ads paid for by impressions, not clicks, so every time you load this page and get served up that ad, you are costing him money. So don’t click on the ad at all, that’s what gives him a sense of accomplishment. The best thing you can do is visit Scienceblogs over and over again, bleeding away the money he sunk into the ad and transferring it to my pocket, and never once click on it.

Anyway, his schtick is really clumsy. He wants you to visit his page in which he makes lots of dramatic claims, and then in order to go on and read more, you have to give him a name and address and get on his mailing list. Don’t do it. It’s like signing up for a subscription to have moldy maggoty tapioca poured in your ear every day.

Here’s what he says if you were to waste your time clicking on his ad. It’s a prediction that Darwinism will expire in a few years.

It’s no different than the Berlin Wall in 1986, Enron in 2000 or the US financial markets 3 years ago: It’s a bubble propped up by academic theorists, atheist zealots, politics and shell games – not hard science.

All that needs to happen is for the right 3-5 scientists to step forward and expose the evolution industry for what it is…. and it’s not a question of “IF”, it’s only a question of WHEN. Darwinism has about 2-5 years left. And when the !@#$ hits the, fan it’s it’s gonna be quite a spectacle.

But that’s not the important part! The real crime is that the “evolutionists” never bothered to tell you how evolution REALLY works. The evolutionary process is neither random nor accident. It’s purposeful, it’s pre-programmed, it’s so ingenious and elegant it takes your breath away.

In fact the evolutionary paradigm I’m about to share with you was first proposed more than 60 years ago. It was an object of derision and ridicule until it won the Nobel Prize for Science in 1983.

No, he doesn’t actually share the secrets with you. You have to sign up for his ego-serving mailing list, and then he’ll tell you. Maybe. He was dunning me with email for a long time, and he never managed to say anything that made sense or even revealed a speck of biological knowledge. He’s an electrical engineer and he’s an idiot. Surprise!

By the way, there is no Nobel Prize for Science. There is a Nobel Prize in Physics, which was won in 1983 by Chandresekhar and Fowler for work on stellar evolution and the formation of elements; I don’t think that’s it. There’s a Nobel Prize in Chemistry, won by Henry Taube for work on electron transfer reactions; even less likely. Then there’s the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, won by Barbara McClintock for the discovery of mobile genetic elements; BINGO. McClintock’s work was certainly surprising, amazing, wonderful…and also difficult to understand, and I can tell you that I’ve always been dazzled by the astounding insight she brought to that work, but no, it doesn’t revolutionize evolution in any way. It’s all pure genetics, no magic, and certainly has no implication of a designer.

As for his claim that Darwinism is in trouble and will end in 2013 — <snore>. It’s a creationist cliche, and they’ve been saying this since before Darwin. Predictions that evolution is doomed have been collected by Glenn Morton in The Imminent Demise of Evolution: The Longest Running Falsehood in Creationism.
The funniest one there is Dembski’s prediction in 2004 that “molecular Darwinism” will be dead in the next five years. The only interesting thing about these predictions is that they set a date for the next creationist-mocking party. See you in 2013!

The more you repress it, the more you want it

The biggest consumer of porn in the US is Utah, and hotels report increased viewing of porn during religious conventions. Could there be a relationship between religiosity and private viewing of porn? Here’s another datum: use google to look at searches for pornographic terms world-wide.

Google ranks Pakistan No.1 in the world in searches for pornographic terms, outranking every other country in searches per person for certain sex-related content, FOXNews.com said.

Pakistan has ranked No.1 in searches per-person for “horse sex” since 2004, “donkey sex” since 2007, “rape pictures” between 2004 and 2009, “rape sex” since 2004, “child sex” between 2004 and 2007 and since 2009, “animal sex” since 2004 and “dog sex” since 2005, according to Google Trends and Google Insights, features of Google that generate data based on popular search terms.

The country has also been No.1 in searches for “sex”, “camel sex”, “rape video” and “child sex video”.

Yuck, FoxNews is saying this? Confirm it for yourself, try looking at the data on Google Trends. Pakistanis do love their Google. Next in the running: India, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, Morocco, South Africa, Turkey, and trailing the pack, the United States and Australia. Just to see if it was some weird artifact of Pakistanis googling everything, I checked a few random terms, big screen TV and football and oil. Nope, Pakistan was nothing special in any of those searches — they just really want to see more camel sex.

Before you get too smug, though, the US is #1 in searches for squid sex.

That one might be my fault.

Godless Croats!

They exist, which is very good news in a country that is 85% Catholic…and the reality of a Croatian atheist community was acknowledged in a major newspaper (google translation, for those of us who don’t know the language).

The Enlightenment is busting out all over, it’s good to see.


Never mind the horrible Google translation, here’s a cleaner translation by Nives Skunca:

When they see us, maybe others will want to ‘come out of the closet’ — joked Neven Barković, journalist and managing editor of T-portal [Croatian news portal] while our photographer took shots of him in front of the Tesla monument in Zagreb, in the company of the actress and author Jelena Veljača and the painter Bane Milenković .

The three of them belong to a new generation of Croatian atheist who, together with the philosopher Dr. Pavel Gregorić, molecular biologist Dr. Boris Lenhard, and physicist Dr. Dejan Vinković, agreed to speak publicly about their atheism.

It is not popular to declare oneself as an atheist (person who does not believe in God) in Croatia, and people who do often get labeled as ìcommunistsî and “persecutors of all things Croatian and Catholic”. According to the last census in 2001, about five percent of Croatian citizens identified themselves as atheists or agnostics (people who think that God’s existence can be neither proved nor disproved), and 95 percent considered themselves as believers. We asked our interlocutors whether it is undesirable to be an atheist in Croatia today.

– Yes, it is undesirable to be an atheist in a country where religious groups are financed from the state budget, not from the donations of the followers. It is undesirable to be an atheist if you are a parent of a school-child, torn between the wish to spare your child of religious indoctrination and the wish to spare them of social rejection and wandering the hallways because suitable alternative classes are not offered – said Pavel Gregorić (38), who recognized he was an atheist in high school, when he understood the meaning of the word. – I’ve never had a religious phase in my life and never had the need to flirt with faith — pointed out Gregorić.

Boris Lenhard (38) also never had a serious religious stage in his life, nor did he attend catechism classes. – Out of self-educational interest, in one period of my life I started to study world religions, their doctrines and historical development.

It was then that I was forced to realize that any theology, which I naively considered a philosophical discipline, is in fact an attorney-style defense of irrational ideas for which, as in any other defenses of that kind, the goal is not to find out the truth, but to defend their ‘clients’, often in the face of facts — Lenhard said, stressing that theology is no stranger to prevarication, obscurantism and dishonest manipulation. – When you realize that the doctrines and interpretations of each religion are utterly arbitrary and that they were modified throughout history to preserve the authority of their umbrella organization, the most plausible explanation is that they were created and maintained by people, for the goals that are not nearly as noble as they want to make them look – said Lenhard.

Unlike Lenhard and Gregorić, Neven Barković (32) went through a five-year long religious phase. – It was during high school, but my religious phase was neither Christian nor Catholic, but some kind of a semi-eastern mixture. After letting go of this belief, I never returned to religion. In fact, I realized that I definitely do not need the ‘God hypothesis’ as I have no good reason to believe that he really exists – said Barković.

Bane Milenković (47) liked going to church in his early childhood.

– My great-grandmother took me to church regularly. For me as a small boy, the neighborhood church looked fantastic, surreal. However, growing up led me in another direction from the church and then I realized that I do not need it, with respect to my inner code – recalled Milenković. Dejan Vinković (38) admitted that in the eighties, during the entire primary school, he attended the church catechism classes. — But, obviously, it did not have too much of an influence on me – said Vinković.

Jelena Veljača (29) was raised in the atheistic spirit, but in early puberty went through inner examination of the faith issue.

– When I was 12, it was wartime and the Croats were returning to the Church, as the Church was returning among the Croats. The school was dominated by the atmosphere in which we were divided into those who attend the catechism class and those ‘poor ones’ who do not, with whom there is something clearly wrong. I had questioned myself then whether something was wrong with me – Jelena remembered, referring also to the widespread view that the children of communists are atheists, and the children of the faithful are believers. – My parents are middle class and apolitical. Both are engineers and ‘naturalists’ and it shaped my atheist upbringing – said Jelena Veljača.

Pavel Gregorić said that his paternal grandfather was a founding member of the Croatian Communist Party and the mother’s father the Secretary of the Local Party Committee and the Mayor of Zagreb. – But there were no Marx’s images in the house, no quotations of Lenin, no partisan songs. I do not remember any kind of ideological indoctrination in the house, but interest in sciences and arts was fostered – Gregorić said, adding that the thesis “of the children of believers and Communists” has certain foundation.

– As a rule, children of Roman Catholics are Roman Catholics, of Muslims are Muslim, and of Hinduists are Hindu, and atheists are generally children who come from families of secular values. This just shows the extent to which being religious is a matter of mere coincidence, depending on the kind of family you were born into and the environmental influences you were exposed to early on – said Gregorić.

Our respondents reacted to the statement of Pope Benedict XVI on atheism as “the mystery of evil.”

– I do not understand how someone who advocates tolerance can have such a myopic attitude towards atheism, because it inevitably leads to confrontation with the atheists who must defend themselves against such charges – said Vinković. Lenhard is of similar opinion – These statements only show what kind of intolerant public figures we are expected to tolerate. A person who thinks of atheism as evil has seriously disturbed criteria and priorities for someone who allegedly brings people peace and goodwill – said Lenhard.

Neven Barković was even harsher. – The Pope is the last one with a moral right to talk about atheism as evil. Based on judicial bodies around the world, it is already very well known that the Catholic Church participated in the organized protection of hundreds of pedophiles from the rule of law. On the other hand, many atheists are often humanitarians. The fact that we do not have some magical beliefs does not mean that we do not have firm moral and humanistic convictions – said Braković.

Jelena Veljača feels similarly.

– Why does the Church think that atheists cannot be moral, honest and spiritual people? On the other hand, horrible things like child rape and the Crusades occurred under the aegis of religion. And what exactly does it mean to be a believer? Is it being a member of a parish, or someone living by the principles of Jesus or Mohammed? – asked Veljača.

Bane Milenković, however, believes that the Church should not view atheists and believers as “black and white.”

– I think that being a believer and living in harmony with the faith is an extremely honest, generous and spiritual act. Also, the ultimate spiritual person may be a non-believer not going to church, but in many situations, behaving better, and be more tolerant and humane in accordance with their own code. This code does not have to be instilled by the priests. Religious freedom includes the liberty to state that you are an atheist. Religious freedom must exist, just like the freedom from religion – said Milenković.

Our respondents agree with the view that catechism classes do not belong in state schools, but in the Church. — The state is not in the Church, but the Church is in the state – considers Milenković. Barković, however, points out that Croatia is a secular state. – Our Constitution states that the Church is separate from the state. The Constitution is our most important document, more important than the Bible – stated Barković. Gregorić agrees and adds that religious education is not the type of content suitable for schools. – What is taught in catechism is largely contrary to what is taught in history, geography and biology, and the method of teaching in catechism is in its very nature opposite to the way other subjects should be taught, encouraging students to question and think independently – explained Gregorić.

Jelena Veljača believes that instead of religious instruction, schools should teach religious culture. – If someone wants to educate a child in a religious direction, they should do it in the church where it belongs — said Veljača.

Lenhard believes that children of parents who are not believers are under pressure to attend religious class, as not to differ from the others. – In the secular, civil state this should not happen – said Lenhard. Dejan Vinković, however, thinks that religious education is a legal issue and a political hot potato. – There is a definite problem in adjusting the current way of conducting catechism classes in schools and secular ideas, but it is an issue that will ultimately have to be resolved in the Constitutional Court. The issue of funding religious classes will have to be settled, because it makes no sense for all citizens to pay taxes for that purpose, instead of just those that are officially declared as believers – said Vinković.

Is atheism a new religion?

It is often heard in the discussions that atheism is a new religion.

– It’s similar to claiming that I am an addict because I do not do drugs. Atheism simply means that you do not need to introduce God into the description of the world you live in. I have no need to introduce the elves and dragons, does that mean that I am a believer in characters from fairy tales? – said Vinković.

Lenhard shares his opinion. – When you do not tell a bedtime story to a child, is this a type of bedtime story? Or, to paraphrase A. Grayling, if atheism is a religion, than not collecting stamps is a hobby. The absence of belief is not belief, and religion cannot be based on it. My attitude is not to believe that there is no God but, on the basis of everything I know, that I do not believe that there is one, be it a Christian or any of the thousands of other deities that different people claim or used to claim to exist – said Lenhard.

Gregorić emphasizes that religion is based on a belief in one or more supernatural beings, on revelation, on the authority of the privileged interpreters of revelation, on rituals. – In atheism, there is none of that. However, one could mischievously say that atheism is based on the belief that there is no God, the revelation is Dawkinsís book The God Delusion, the privileged interpreters are Hitchens and Harris, and the rituals consist of attending atheis conventions and taking rides with atheist buses, so that atheism is a religion. But this is a caricature in which few atheists will recognize themselves – he explained.

Atheism would like to establish a belief on proof or hard evidence. Not only do we lack solid evidence that supernatural beings exist – Lord, Allah, Vishnu or the Tooth-Fairy – but we have pretty good evidence that they do not exist. There is no atheist who would not be ready to become a theist if presented with solid evidence that God exists – concluded Gregorić.

Darn, I knew I was missing something

Schools often block access to parts of the internet, which is fine, if only to focus students’ attention a little bit. It is not fine when they discriminate, like Indianapolis public schools, which block on religious views other than the Abrahamic religions. Their rules, though, mention something I did not know.

Sites that promote and provide information on religions such as Wicca, Witchcraft or Satanism. Occult Practices, atheistic views, voodoo rituals or other forms of mysticism, […] the use of spells, incantations, curses, and magic powers. This category includes sites which discuss or deal with paranormal or unexplained events.

Now I know I have this reputation as a big fat atheist, but I have to confess to not knowing something here. Can anyone tell me what the atheist spells, incantations, curses, and magic powers are? Please give me recipes in the comments. They might be handy, but, well, no one ever taught them to me. I blame it on being brought up in a Christian family — they didn’t know anything about atheist rituals or enchantments.

Oh, and if Indianapolis schools ban sites that talk about “paranormal or unexplained events”, why aren’t they blocking all of the Christian sites? Jesus was one paranormal dude with unexplained magic powers, you know.

A glimpse of a theocratic world

Nope, I’m going to call this story debunked. A commenter has pointed out that Jhelum has several established Christian communities and is not the monolithic Islamic city the story implies, so it looks like this is a complete fabrication by Compass Direct News, a Christian propaganda outfit. The only stories here are that Christians lie to feed their martyr complex, and sometimes I’m fooled.

Jamshed Masih is a police officer in Pakistan who also happens to be a Christian. He transferred to a town dominated by the local Muslim cleric, Maulana Mahfooz Khan. In a story that sounds like the beginning of a Western, Khan warned Masih that Jhelum was his place, and he wasn’t going to stand for any filthy Christian scum livin’ in this here town. Local businesses refused to serve his family, there was a lot of tension…if this were a movie, you’d expect the new sheriff in town to be cleaning up the intolerant boss.

This wasn’t a movie, though, and the real world never seems to resolve itself so neatly. Instead, while Masih was away, Khan accused his 11 year old son of blaspheming against Allah, roused up a mob of good devout Muslims, and murdered Masih’s wife and four young children. The only blasphemy described is that neighbors heard the children singing hymns at breakfast time.

Yes. They were slaughtered because they did not practice Khan’s religion of peace. And because children were singing songs Khan did not like.

Masih has filed a legal complaint. The police administrators have refused to accept it or do anything, because Khan is powerful in the area, and because, after all, the children were blaspheming against Islam.

No human being should ever have to live under a theocracy, the most barbarous and inhuman form of government anyone has ever developed.

Excellent analysis of the Creation “Museum”

People are still going to the ghastly Creation “Museum” in Kentucky — it’s actually doing a bang-up business. Fortunately, some of the people going are critics who can see its troubling flaws.

When I went, what leapt out at me was the intellectual dishonesty of the place; it mimics a museum, but it isn’t, and it pretends to understand evolution when it doesn’t. I walked through it with a little alarm bell in my head going “wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong” nonstop.

Ideas Man picks up on another aspect of the “museum”: it’s a temple to fear. Everywhere you go, it portrays violence and bloody conflict, not just as the legacy of our past, but something to prepare for right now. I pointed out the raving paranoia of Ken Ham earlier, and honestly, the museum is the product of a mind convinced that it is persecuted, that there shall be redemption in blood, and that mass murder really is justifiable if God says so.

i-3a0e85c2a197db4dcde6a49169f90b41-sinners_die-thumb-200x191-53026.jpeg

The whole flood exhibit is particularly appalling. Look at the loving detail in this diorama; those are the sinners suffering and dying in God’s global punishment. There was a very cold video being shown there, portraying children playing innocently in a small village when the awful wave of the coming deluge rises on the horizon…and all are killed. It’s very weird that on the one hand, they portray secular life as depravity and drugs and sex and crime, but on the other, their god is an unholy monster who slaughters children — and that’s OK!

What the “museum” actually is is an effective exhibit of intellectual terrorism — you will accept its worldview, or you will die horribly. And if you already accept that view, you can smugly wallow in the certainty that all those elitist jerks who think they’re smarter than you will suffer.

Let’s ask ourselves, once again, what the museum actually does. If it in fact does something very well and if the thing that it does it does as a function of its central narrative, we ought to assume that that is its primary ideological function. It is from this perspective that we’ll understand the Museum as a work of art, an ideological work of art, art for the sake of ideology or, perhaps, better, ideology for the sake of ideology.

What exactly did the museum do?

It scared. It scared us because it’s scary. And it’s scary because it’s supposed to be scary.

So why is it supposed to be scary? How does its fear function?
Let’s see if we can hear anything from the horse’s mouth:

One of the things that Ken Hamm told us when he was was giving his presentation was along the following lines: “you know, a lot of people ask me why we have such a realistic scene of Adam sacrificing an animal right when you walk into the Corruption room, but actually that’s one of my favorite exhibits because it shows the importance of sacrifice. It shows that we need to sacrifice to live after the Fall.”

Did you notice the weird shift that happened there?

Sacrifice is an important theme in Christianity, right? Well, of course. After the Fall, we are all mortal and our morality means suffering. Our suffering means loss. Loss means economy and sacrifice. On the traditional account, Christ “pays the infinite debt for us.” In other words on the traditional account, self-sacrifice is the redemption of suffering.

That’s not exactly how it works in the Creation Museum’s logic: there, sacrifice is demanded because the world is a bloody place. We don’t see Adam suffering: we see Adam sacrificing. Christ’s death isn’t taken to redeem the suffering of Adam, it’s a grotesque mimicry of the sacrifice we saw him doing. Suffering is passive. Sacrifice is active.

It’s a violent world. The message of the “museum” is to revel in that violence, because it is God’s will. And you can help!