
Metasepia pfefferi
Figure from Cephalopods: A World Guide (amzn/b&n/abe/pwll), by Mark Norman.
Wouldn’t some variant of this image make for a most excellent tattoo?
(I expect the Trophy Wife will come screeching into the parking lot any minute now, to tell me no, no, no while hitting me with a rolled up newspaper.)
Oh, joy! Carl Zimmer has published a profile of Roger Hanlon, the well-known cephalopod expert, and he is specifically discussing the work on camouflage that I previously summarized. I’ve also cited his work on sexual mimicry and nuptial dances — this is a fellow whose work all true worshipers of the cephalopod should be following.
This is no fair. I left Seattle 30 years ago, and now they’re celebrating Octopus Week? Maybe if they’d thought of it then, I wouldn’t have moved to Oregon, and Utah, And Pennsylvania, and Minnesota.
Approximately 1.4 million people have emailed me with a link to this article on body modification (I’m not complaining, do feel free to send me stuff). It includes this picture.

I’m sorry, but no thanks. That’s a wanna-be kluge. It’s pathetic. The guy has just had some kind of silicone rings stuck under his skin, and I am unimpressed.

Give me a call when we’ve got gene modification and some method of reiterating ontogenesis in my arms. I want neural control of a sophisticated muscular structure, not some inert faux lump. Adding sharp-edged teeth to the structure is optional, but highly desirable.
And all those tatoos? Bugger those, too. I want these:

Imagine a whole network of those under your skin, linked by nerves to your brain, with the ability to change color and pattern under conscious control.
I sneer at anything less. The body-modification crowd is hampered by feeble imaginations that think needles and ink and holes and bumps are impressive — I’m holding out for something a little more substantial than cosmetic geegaws.
