Discuss: Political Madness All the Time


Lynna is your curator. How are you all holding up, America? Not well, I guess, since this is the hardest working thread ever. The frenzy is growing!

(Previous thread)(Next thread)

Comments

  1. Akira MacKenzie says

    @ 495

    Burn, baby! Buuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuurn. (As long as no one get’s hurt, of course.)

  2. says

    From Mitch McConnell:

    Look, I think it’s pretty clear our Democratic colleagues do not have a great affinity for President Trump, but the country cannot afford for Democrats in Congress to take a one-year vacation from any productive legislation just because they’d rather obsess over impeachment.

    The man lives in an irony-free zone.

    This year alone the Democratic majority in the House of Representatives, under the leadership of Nancy Pelosi, passed a democracy-reform package, the Equality Act to expand civil rights to LGBTQ Americans, the Dream and Promise Act, the Paycheck Fairness Act, a bill to expand background checks on gun purchases, and a bill to address the climate crisis.

    They also passed bills to lower prescription drug costs, expand the Violence Against Women Act, and expand the Dream Act for younger immigrants.

    Now lets look at what the Senate, led by Mitch McConnell, has done:

    Barring something unexpected, this Tuesday will mark two months since the U.S. Senate held a roll call vote on passage of any type of legislation. That was a joint resolution to nullify President Donald Trump’s declaration of a national emergency at the Mexican border (which Trump later vetoed).

    It’s been three months, as of Sunday, since the Senate last took yeas and nays on a genuine, full-fledged bill…. The United States Senate, that great deliberative body, has effectively ceased legislating this year. It has shut down. Closed for business until 2021.

    WGBH link to an article by David Bernstein.

  3. says

    Sen. Murphy:

    Today I’ll be asking questions at the nomination hearing of our new Amb. to Russia.

    Probably a good day to run down the mindblowingly long list of ways that Trump’s foreign policy has been one giant wet kiss to Russia.

    Hard to fit it all in one thread, but let’s give it a shot!…

    Thread at the link. And there’s so much more!

  4. says

    Some of Trump’s “like a dog” statements:

    “Last night was a great night for the United States and for the world. A brutal killer, one who has caused so much hardship and death, has violently been eliminated. He will never again harm another innocent man, woman, or child. He died like a dog.” Trump repeated that al-Baghdadi “died like a dog” several more times.

    Trump also described ISIS leaders as acting like “very frightened puppies.”

    Trump said that Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam (D) “choked like a dog” at a press conference.

    In 2016, Trump told then-House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), “You were out there dying like a dog, Paul. Like a dog!”

    Trump claimed that Retired Gen. Stanley McChrystal was “fired like a dog.”

    Trump described Steve Bannon as being “dumped like a dog.” He said that Mitt Romney “choked like a dog.” Trump claimed that Ted Cruz “lies like a dog.” Trump claimed that Brent Bozell came to his office “begging for money like a dog.”

    In my experience, dogs don’t lie.

    About Arianna Huffington, Trump wrote that he had criticized Huffington’s appearance, “Because she is a dog who wrongfully comments on me.”

    About Omarosa Manigault-Newman, Trump said, “Good work by General Kelly for quickly firing that dog!”

  5. says

    I quoted more from this Natasha Bertrand Politico report at the end of the previous iteration, but I’m still floored by it so here are the most striking passages – “Nunes acolyte misrepresented himself to Trump as Ukraine expert”:

    The decorated Army officer who testified to House investigators on Tuesday told lawmakers that a close associate of Republican Rep. Devin Nunes “misrepresented” himself to President Donald Trump in an effort to involve himself further in Ukraine policy, according to two people familiar with his closed-door deposition.

    Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, the National Security Council’s top Ukraine expert, told lawmakers that after attending Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s inauguration in May as part of a delegation led by Energy Secretary Rick Perry, Vindman had been looking forward to debriefing Trump and giving a positive account of Zelensky’s vision for Ukraine’s future.

    But he was instructed “at the last second” not to attend the debriefing, Vindman told lawmakers, because Trump’s advisers worried it might confuse the president: Trump believed at the time that Kashyap Patel, a longtime Nunes staffer who joined the White House in February and had no discernible Ukraine experience or expertise, was actually the NSC’s top Ukraine expert instead of Vindman.

    Vindman also testified that he was told Patel had been circumventing normal NSC process to get negative material about Ukraine in front of the president, feeding Trump’s belief that Ukraine was brimming with corruption and had interfered in the 2016 election on behalf of Democrats.

    That upset Vindman, along with Hill and Bolton, he testified, because they were constantly having to counter that narrative with the president.

    It’s still not clear what materials Patel was giving Trump, or where he was getting them. But he was not interacting with Ukraine experts at the State Department and Pentagon on the issue, and never had a conversation with Vindman, the NSC’s director for Ukraine, about Ukraine — or about anything for that matter, Vindman testified….

  6. says

    Repetition of details that were covered in the previous chapter of this thread:

    Army Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, the top Ukraine expert on the National Security Council, told members of Congress that he tried to edit a White House log of a July call between President Donald Trump and Ukraine’s president to include details that were omitted, one lawmaker present at the testimony and another source familiar with it confirmed to NBC News.

    Vindman testified in a closed-door deposition before House impeachment investigators that the attempted edits were to reflect Trump mentioning possible recordings of former vice president Joe Biden discussing corruption in Ukraine and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy mentioning Bursima, the company who had hired Biden’s son, Hunter, the sources said. […]

    NBC News link. More at the link.

    Excerpts from commentary by Steve Benen:

    […] A New York Times report added that there is no audio recording of the Trump/Zelensky call, but White House notetakers and voice recognition software created a rough transcript. At that point, the document went to Vindman, the top Ukraine expert on the White House National Security Council, to help fill in gaps, especially as they relate to proper nouns and technical terms that would be unfamiliar to notetakers and the software.

    Vindman reviewed the rough transcript and made edits. Yesterday, the Army lieutenant colonel told lawmakers that some of those edits were not reflected in the final document that was released to the public.

    And according to the latest reporting, some of the omissions related specifically to Trump’s interest in Joe Biden.

    For context, it’s worth noting that Donald Trump has assured the public that the released call summary is “an exact word-for-word transcript of the conversation.” In fact, [Trump] has referred to the document as an “exact” transcript at least 16 times.

    Yes, that’s Trump’s usual modus operandi, repeat the lie until his base believes it.

    It now appears those claims were false – and it’s a curious thing for Trump to have lied about.

    […] we know that the transcript isn’t a transcript, and its omissions are directly relevant to the scandal.

    As for the apparent attempt at a White House cover-up, it’ll be interesting to know who was involved in keeping Vindman’s recommended edits out of the official document.

  7. says

    TPM – “Dems Devise Clever Way To Counter Trump Stonewalling On Impeachment”:

    House Democrats’ plans for their impeachment proceedings include a clever provision to punish the White House for stonewalling the investigation.

    On Tuesday night the House Judiciary Committee released a set of impeachment protocols to go along with the broader resolution that the House will likely vote on this week, outlining the public phase of its impeachment inquiry.

    The new impeachment protocols offer the President the due process rights that Republicans complain have been absent in the inquiry, but they come with a twist.

    A provision in the package says that if the President “unlawfully” refuses “to make witnesses available for testimony to, or to produce documents requested by” the committees currently leading the impeachment probe, the House Judiciary Committee chairman will have the right to deny the due process procedures outlined in the procedures.

    The provision appears to be a reference to the White House’s directive to the administration that it not comply with document requests or make available officials for testimony. Several administration officials have defied the blockade, but others have cited it to dodge testifying, and multiple document requests by the House have gone unfulfilled.

    The due process procedures that Trump otherwise would have access to are similar to or go beyond what was available for previous presidents who faced impeachment, according to a comparison chart released by the House Democrats.

    The House Rules Committee is marking up the broader impeachment procedures package on Wednesday, and it is expected that a full floor vote on the resolution will happen Thursday, before the House leaves for an 11-day recess….

    More atl.

  8. says

    SC @5, I just watched that video. It’s very well done. Ha! Funny … and distressingly sad for real. I’m starting to think that Trump sees himself as a dog in his nightmares.

    In other news, there is some discussion of the idea that Trump may have scheduled his plans to attend the World Series to coincide with the raid that killed al-Baghdadi, because he thought he would be cheered for killing the ISIS leader. Trump was roundly booed, and treated to chants of “lock him up!” (Caged like a dog?)

    Josh Marshall wrote a brief essay on the timing of Trump’s visit to the World Series:

    Mainly, I think this is simply too absurd to be true. What’s more, the timing of a high stakes raid is very hard to predict. They can go badly or more likely just be canceled at the last minute. But TPM Reader SA suggested a possibility that at least has had me wondering. Remember Trump’s Razor. The stupidest possible explanation that is reconcilable with the available facts will most likely be true. So with that in mind, here’s TPM Reader AS …

    I was quite surprised when I heard that Trump had plans to attend World Series, as he’s been so careful about avoiding crowds that might boo him. Is it possible that it was more than a coincidence that he had plans to attend the game on the night after the raid? It’s totally ridiculous, but Trump’s Razor suggests that the World Series appearance was scheduled days earlier only because Trump wanted to time it with the raid. I mean, why else wait until a possible Game 5?

    As I said and as AS himself concedes, it’s just too absurd. And yet Trump’s Razor is a powerful heuristic device with years of preternatural explanatory power behind it. The key thing to me is that AS is right: Trump has been very careful and very disciplined (uncharacteristic!) about not going to mass events where his massive unpopularity would lead to such a booing humiliation. He’s in the middle of an impeachment drama. He’s almost as unpopular as he’s ever been. And the stadium is in almost universally blue DC, surrounded by very blue Maryland and fairly blue Northern Virginia. […]

    […] The White House announced the President would attend game after Game 2 and before Game 3. In other words, it was announced at a time when it was quite plausible, though still unlikely, that the Nats would sweep and there wouldn’t be a Game 5.

    So why Game 5? Well, one pretty plausible explanation is that it takes a lot of prep for the Secret Service to do enough legwork to allow the President in a fairly unsecure stadium of tens of thousands of people. And yet if he wanted to go he had since the Nats and Astros clinched to have them start making preparations.

    Anyway, yes, it really is too absurd. But maybe … It’s Trump after all. […]

  9. says

    Gaetz Files Delusional Ethics Complaint Against Schiff

    https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/gaetz-ethics-complaint-schiff

    Rep. Matt Gaetz, who has been practically jumping up and down for […] Trump’s attention lately, filed an ethics complaint on Wednesday against Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-CA).

    Among his accusations are that Schiff “distorted” Trump’s call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and that the chairman won’t allow Gaetz to bust into any impeachment inquiry hearings he pleases. […]

    Gaetz, as always, is performing for an audience of one.

    Embarrassing selfie photo of Matt Gaetz as über Trump toady is available at the link.

  10. says

    Lynna @ #8:

    In other news, there is some discussion of the idea that Trump may have scheduled his plans to attend the World Series to coincide with the raid that killed al-Baghdadi, because he thought he would be cheered for killing the ISIS leader.

    Even if he didn’t schedule it for that reason, he absolutely went thinking he’d be greeted with thunderous cheers. I’ve suspected for a while now that his aides are giving him fake information – not just carefully selected to protect his pathologically fragile ego, not just Fox or Breitbart propaganda or fawning tweets, but actual made up polls and reports and such, which has further weakened his already tenuous grasp on reality.

  11. says

    Daniel Dale at CNN – “Trump’s Ukraine dishonesty barrage continues. He made 96 false claims last week”:

    President Donald Trump was relentlessly dishonest last week about the scandal over his dealings with Ukraine, making false claims about just about every component of the story.

    Trump made 96 false claims last week, the second-highest total of the 16 weeks we’ve counted at CNN. He made 53 false claims last Monday alone — a remarkable 31 in rambling comments at his Cabinet meeting and 22 more in an interview with Fox News’ Sean Hannity.

    Fifty-three false claims is by far the most Trump has made in any day in the 16 weeks we’ve tracked, beating the previous high of 41. Trump has averaged about 68 false claims per week over the 16-week period — just shy of 10 false claims per day.

    His deception last week was focused on his conduct toward Ukraine and Democrats’ related impeachment inquiry. Deep breath now:

    He falsely claimed he had released an exact transcript of his July phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. He falsely claimed he did not ask Zelensky for anything on the call. He falsely claimed people aren’t talking about the call anymore.

    He falsely claimed the whistleblower complaint about the call was “totally wrong.” He falsely claimed the whistleblower alleged he had made seven or eight mentions of a “quid pro quo.” He falsely claimed the whistleblower has vanished. He falsely claimed Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff was the whistleblower’s source.

    He falsely claimed Schiff had spoken about the call at a committee hearing before, not after, the release of the rough transcript. He falsely claimed Schiff’s committee comments were illegal. He falsely claimed Republicans aren’t allowed to ask questions in Democrats’ impeachment inquiry hearings. And he falsely claimed those closed-door hearings are unprecedented.

    The President complained that the media doesn’t want to talk about his declaration, in a 2000 book, that Osama bin Laden needed to be killed. In fact, he didn’t say anything like that.

    Much more atl.

  12. says

    From Wonkette:

    History may not repeat itself, but these impeachment hearings have some weird freakin’ echoes. Today, diplomat Catherine Croft testified to House impeachment investigators that, “During my time at the NSC, I received multiple calls from lobbyist Robert Livingston, who told me that Ambassador Yovanovitch should be fired. He characterized Ambassador Yovanovitch as an ‘Obama holdover’ and associated with George Soros.”

    Forget the Obama/Soros bullshit for a second. Does she mean THAT Bob Livingston? The former Louisiana congressman who resigned in 1998, just hours before the hearings to impeach Bill Clinton for high blow job crimes, after Hustler magazine outed Livingston for multiple affairs while in office? The same Bob Livingston who successfully spearheaded Turkey’s lobbying efforts in 2008 to stop Congress from recognizing the Armenian genocide? He can’t possibly be about to play a role in Donald Trump’s impeachment, too, can he?

    OH, BUT HE CAN!

    Turns out, Rudy and the chucklefucks weren’t the only ones back channeling to get our long-serving Ukrainian ambassador booted. And while Croft wasn’t able to work out “at whose direction or at whose expense Mr. Livingston was seeking the removal of Ambassador Yovanovitch,” the Wall Street Journal suggests that he was working for then-Ukrainian presidential candidate Yuliya Tymoshenko. Speaking of echoes, you may remember her as the former Ukrainian president thrown in jail by her successor, Putin’s buddy Viktor Yanukovych. Which was just fine according to the fancy American law firm Paul Manafort paid to “investigate” her for the benefit of his Ukrainian patrons in 2012.

    But in 2018, Tymoshenko was running for another term, and she hired Livingston to get her in to see high-ranking American officials. The Journal reports:

    In June 2018, Justice Department records show, Mr. Livingston registered to represent a firm linked to Yulia Tymoshenko—the former Ukrainian prime minister who at the time was running for president against Volodymyr Zelensky, the current president—and Mr. Poroshenko. Over the following months, Mr. Livingston contacted dozens of government officials in an effort to arrange meetings for Ms. Tymoshenko in Washington, among them Messrs. Trump, Bolton and Volker as well as Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, according to public records.

    Ms. Tymoshenko met with Messrs. Volker and Anderson in December 2018, accompanied by Mr. Livingston, the records show. The following day, another lobbyist at Mr. Livingston’s firm introduced her to Mr. Giuliani. They discussed, among other matters, “the provision of US assistance to Ukraine,” according to her website.

    So let’s see if we’ve got this straight. The guy who was supposed to take over as House speaker from noted philanderer Newt Gingrich, but wound up instead passing the gavel to child molester Denny Hastert, is mixed up in Trump’s impeachment because he got involved with Rudy Giuliani’s conspiracy theory back channel to the State Department to get rid of the US Ambassador for her anti-corruption efforts. Because in Ukraine, Soros’s foundation funds good government, anti-corruption groups, and that’s why Tymoshenko and the chucklefucks’ patron Dmitry Firtash hate him.

    It’s not what you would call A GOOD LOOK for Bob Livingston. […]

    The rest of today’s testimony is not any better for Donald Trump and his demented personal attorney. Today’s witnesses served as advisors to Ukraine special envoy Kurt Volker, with Croft taking over from Christopher Anderson in July 2019. In Anderson’s opening statement, he testified that the White House put the kibosh on State Department condemnation of a Russian attack on Ukrainian military ships. […]

    Why would Trump oppose condemning Putin’s aggressive action toward his neighbor? Yeah, that’s a mystery! Hey, remember that time Trump “canceled” his G20 meeting with Putin to give him a hard slap on the wrist for that attack, but then secretly met with Putin anyway? Good times.

    Anderson also testified that NSA John Bolton “cautioned that Mr. Giuliani was a key voice with the President on Ukraine which could be an obstacle to increased White House engagement.” Could be!

    When Croft took over the position, she “became aware” of Volker’s side discussions with the president’s personal lawyer, but says she was not included in their cahootsing. But she does confirm Bill Taylor’s testimony that an unnamed Office of Management and Budget official said the order to withhold congressionally allocated funds from Ukraine “came at the direction of the President” on a July 18 phone call.

    So far, all the witnesses are telling the exact same story. And it’s not a story that looks good for Donald Trump. Or the unflushable Bob Livingston.

  13. says

    From text quoted by SC in comment 12:

    […] He falsely claimed he had released an exact transcript of his July phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

    He falsely claimed he did not ask Zelensky for anything on the call. He falsely claimed people aren’t talking about the call anymore.

    He falsely claimed the whistleblower complaint about the call was “totally wrong.”

    He falsely claimed the whistleblower alleged he had made seven or eight mentions of a “quid pro quo.”

    He falsely claimed the whistleblower has vanished.

    He falsely claimed Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff was the whistleblower’s source.

    He falsely claimed Schiff had spoken about the call at a committee hearing before, not after, the release of the rough transcript.

    He falsely claimed Schiff’s committee comments were illegal.

    He falsely claimed Republicans aren’t allowed to ask questions in Democrats’ impeachment inquiry hearings. […]

    Trump is a veritable firehose of lies. It’s too bad that we can’t somehow convert him into a firefighting mechanism for California.

  14. johnson catman says

    re SC @11: I was SO pleased to see the crowd loudly booing The Orange Toddler-Tyrant at the game, chanting “Lock him up!”, and seeing the “Impeach Trump” banner unfurled on the upper deck, as well as the “Veterans for Impeachment” banners behind home plate. The Orange Id10t needs to see more of that because his rallies provide a dishonest picture of how the US really feels about him. Fuck that motherfucker! Make him feel how unwelcome he really is!

  15. says

    The Democrats have invited John Bolton to come for a deposition next Thursday. They’ve also invited NSC counsel, John Eisenberg, to whom like half of the people deposed so far expressed their concerns and who appears to have orchestrated much of the cover-up.

  16. says

    Updates to previous:

    Kurdistan 24 – “Thousands of civilians flee Turkish attacks despite ceasefire deal”:

    …The attacks followed the withdrawal of Syrian army forces from fronts around Til Tamr, Dirbesiye, and Amude, which might indicate Russia was not satisfied with US troops staying in the oil-rich region of Deir al-Zor.

    According to Nicholas A. Heras, a Middle East security analyst at the Washington-based Center for a New American Security, Russia is “acting in bad faith and will allow Turkey to continue to expand as a message to the SDF and the United States that Moscow calls the shots in Syria and that Trump cannot hold Syrian oil with the support of the SDF.”

    He also warned Turkey is not satisfied with a limited enclave it earlier seized during its attacks on the SDF in northeast Syria.

    According to earlier ceasefire deals between both the US and Turkey, and between Russia and Turkey, Turkey is allowed to keep this area between Tal Abyad and Ras al Ain (Serekaniye).

    “The Turkish policy is to control the entire length of the border from the Euphrates to the Tigris,” Heras said.

    Thomas McClure, a Syria-based researcher at the Rojava Information Center, agreed that “Turkey seeks to advance outside the ceasefire lines agreed between Ankara and Moscow.”

    “The SDF withdrew from these fronts to allow SAA [Syrian Arab Army] units to take their place, as part of their agreed withdrawal from the border zone: but Turkey has failed to observe the ceasefire, killing many SAA soldiers as it pushes forwards.”

    He said that it now appears Russia is failing to play its guarantor role in preventing further Turkish violations.

    “More civilians are being displaced in the ongoing violence, and it appears neither Turkey nor Russia are interested in bringing an end to this humanitarian disaster.”

    Jenan Moussa:

    Now it’s clear. There is a disagreement btwn Syrian gov & SDF about a Damascus offer to merge SDF fighters into Syrian army.

    SDF response now:

    “Our position clear: Merging our forces (SDF &SAA) must come from a political settlement that recognizes &preserves SDF structure.”

    SDF statement in response to Damascus offer to merge with Syrian army:

    “(…) We reject the language which was directed at individuals (inside SDF). The Syrian Defence ministry should have addressed the general command of the SDF in order to open the door of dialogue.”

  17. says

    Politico – “Twitter drops all political ads in shot at Zuckerberg”:

    Twitter will no longer run political ads, CEO Jack Dorsey announced on Wednesday, a move that comes as fellow social media giant Facebook faces rising heat over its policy of allowing candidates to lie in their campaign messaging.

    “We believe political message reach should be earned, not bought,” Dorsey said in a series of tweets. “While internet advertising is incredibly powerful and very effective for commercial advertisers, that power brings significant risks to politics, where it can be used to influence votes to affect the lives of millions.”

    Twitter is removing itself from the contentious tangle embroiling Facebook as U.S. political campaigns prepare to spend vast sums of money on online advertising around the 2020 elections. The new policy applies worldwide, not just in the U.S., and to issue ads as well as ads run by specific political campaigns.

    Twitter’s ban, per the company, will go into effect Nov. 22, with details on the policy to be released Nov. 15….

  18. tomh says

    WaPo:
    Judge sets Kupperman hearing for Thursday

    A federal judge has scheduled for 4 p.m. Thursday a hearing on the case of former Trump national security aide Charles Kupperman, who has sued asking the courts to decide whether he must comply with Congress’s subpoena or a White House order not to testify in an impeachment inquiry.

    The hearing had initially been set for 3 p.m. The Department of Justice asked to move it to Friday because of a conflict with the hearing about the testimony of former White House counsel Donald McGahn. But U.S. District Judge Richard J. Leon agreed only to move the hearing by one hour.

  19. tomh says

    WaPo:
    White House lawyer moved transcript of Trump call to classified server after Ukraine adviser raised alarms
    By Carol D. Leonnig, Tom Hamburger and Greg Miller
    Oct. 30, 2019 at 7:50 p.m. PDT

    Moments after President Trump ended his phone call with Ukraine’s president on July 25, an unsettled national security aide rushed to the office of White House lawyer John Eisenberg.

    Army Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, the top Ukraine adviser at the White House, had been listening to the call and was disturbed by the pressure Trump had applied to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate his political rivals, according to people familiar with Vindman’s testimony to lawmakers this week.

    Vindman told Eisenberg, the White House’s legal adviser on national security issues, that what the president did was wrong, said the people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the ongoing investigation.

    Scribbling notes on a yellow legal pad, Eisenberg proposed a step that other officials have said is at odds with long-standing White House protocol: moving a transcript of the call to a highly classified server and restricting access to it, according to two people familiar with Vindman’s account.

    The details of how the White House clamped down on information about the controversial call comes as the House impeachment inquiry turns its focus to the role of Eisenberg, who has served as deputy White House counsel since the start of Trump’s administration. House impeachment investigators on Wednesday evening announced they have asked Eisenberg and a fellow White House lawyer, Mike Ellis, to testify Monday.

  20. johnson catman says

    FBI chief warns Congress of danger from ‘self-radicalized’ domestic terrorists:
    Federal law enforcement and homeland security officials warned about the growing threat of domestic terrorism at a House Homeland Security Committee hearing Wednesday.
    “The prevalent trend of Americans driven by violent extremist ideologies or personal grievances” to commit racially and ethnically-motivated attacks has become “one of the most significant emergent threats” to national security, said Acting Homeland Security Secretary Kevin McAleenan.

    Many of the members of the committee, especially Democrats, including Chairman Bennie Thompson, expressed concerns about the lack of a permanent, confirmed secretary at the Department of Homeland Security.
    McAleenan, a career Homeland Security official who previously served as Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, recently announced his intention to resign after sixth months as acting director. He was the fourth person to run the department since President Trump took office and was never officially nominated. Thursday was slated to be McAleenan’s last day in office, but by the conclusion of Wednesday’s hearing, Trump had yet to name his replacement. Overnight, the New York Times reported that the White House had found a legal loophole that could allow Trump to install one of his political allies who’d previously been considered ineligible.[my emphasis-]

    https://www.aol.com/article/news/2019/10/30/fbi-chief-warns-congress-of-danger-from-self-radicalized-domestic-terrorists/23850298/

  21. says

    Yamiche Alcindor, yesterday:

    NEW: Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, director for European Affairs at NSC, insisted on going to work today, a day after he testified that he twice went to NSC’s top lawyer about his concerns about Trump & others wrongly pressuring Ukraine to investigate Bidens, a source familiar says.

    Source tells me Lt. Col. Vindman is willing to testify publicly to explain his concerns about Trump-Zelensky call & demands to have Ukraine investigate Bidens. Source also says Vindman is on detail to WH from Army. His family has been assured by Army that Army has his back.

    Source also says Lt. Col. Vindman took a lot of notes while on the Trump-Zelensky call. He has detailed notes that are now in a classified NSC system that holds other documents that are part of documents the WH is refusing to provide to Congress as part of impeachment inquiry.

    John Eisenberg, the NSC lawyer that Vindman went to with his concerns twice, took detailed notes when Vindman came to him with Vindman’s concerns, I’m told by a source familiar. Eisenberg took in the information in a neutral way. The big question now, what did Eisenberg do next?

    NEW: Rep. Liz Cheney spoke w/ Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman’s wife yesterday on the phone. Vindman’s wife called Cheney’s office to thank her for praising Vindman’s service as an Army veteran & for saying his patriotism shouldn’t be attacked. Cheney called back & reiterated that.

  22. says

    Marcy Wheeler:

    Reminder that John Eisenberg is the guy who told KT McFarland NOT to write up the denial that Trump was in the loop on Mike Flynn’s Kislyak call bc it would suggest a quid pro quo.

    [screenshot from Mueller report atl]

    He’s been trying to ensure Trump leaves no DOCUMENTARY evidence of his quid pro quos for 32 months now….

  23. says

    In a Fox interview, @SecPompeo peddles a new conspiracy theory involving Obama, Hunter Biden and military aid. This insinuation makes zero sense. Pompeo, the top US diplomat, doesn’t seem to care anymore about trying to establish a reputation as a straight talker.”

    Transcript snippet at the link. He’s nothing more than a Trump flak.

  24. says

    Mustafa Bali (SDF spokesman):

    NE Syrian airspace is owned by the US. It has been open to Turkish aircrafts since Oct. 9 for Turkish army and its jihadists to attack the region (21 days). No cease fire, humanitarian situation has sharply deteriorated. People are undergoing an ethnic cleansing campaign by TR.

    Seeing it took the US a century to recognize Armenian genocide, we hope that the Kurds won’t have to experience the same fate. It is hypocrisy at its finest to recognize a 100 years old genocide and to do almost nothing to prevent an ongoing one.

  25. says

    Reuters – “U.S. forces conduct border patrol in northeast Syria: SDF source”:

    U.S. forces in armored vehicles conducted a patrol on the Syria-Turkey border on Thursday, the first such exercise since a U.S. decision to withdraw from northeast Syria, according to a Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) military source and a witness.

    Armored vehicles carrying a U.S. flag were seen near the Syria-Turkey border, the witness said.

    A military source from the Kurdish-led SDF said the patrols would “not be one-time” only.

    AJ – “US military conducts Syria border patrol as troops, tanks arrive”:

    US forces patrolled part of Syria’s border with Turkey on Thursday in the first such move since Washington withdrew troops from the area earlier this month.

    American infantry troops and tanks also arrived in Syria’s Deir Az Zor region and are expected to head to the northeast, where US President Donald Trump has vowed to secure oilfields under the control of its Kurdish ally, Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF).

    Five armoured vehicles bearing US flags patrolled a strip of the frontier north of the town of Qahtaniyah. The patrol was seen by an AFP news agency correspondent and the SDF confirmed the military activity to Reuters news agency.

    The American patrol was accompanied by Kurdish SDF forces, the main US ally in the years-long battle against the Islamic State Iraq and the Levant (ISIL or ISIS).

    US forces used to patrol the section of the border north of Qahtaniyah before Washington announced its controversial pullback on October 6.

    Thursday’s move came as heavy fighting between Syrian army troops and Turkish forces erupted a day earlier near Ras al-Ain, as Turkish-backed forces seized villages surrounding the border town.

    The violence underscores the risk of full-scale fighting in northeast Syria resuming after Ankara struck separate deals with Washington and Moscow to push the Syrian Kurdish militia People’s Protection Units (YPG) – which spearheads the SDF – at least 30km (19 miles) south of the border….

    Here’s video.

  26. tomh says

    WaPo:
    Is Trump’s base breaking over impeachment? The tale of a congressman’s defiance suggests not.
    By Griff Witte
    Oct. 31, 2019 at 11:36 a.m. PDT

    When it came to impeachment, the congressman wanted “to get all the facts on the table.” He thought the ambassadors testifying in closed session were “professional diplomats,” and that an apparent admission from the White House lectern of a quid pro quo with Ukraine should be taken at face value.

    At another time, under a different president, Republican Rep. Francis Rooney’s words might have seemed innocuous, banal to the point of irrelevance.

    But this is 2019, the president is Trump and in the country clubs and gated communities of Rooney’s ruby-red district along southwest Florida’s shimmering Gulf Coast, the comments provoked a collective howl.

    Republican Facebook pages lit up with indignation that Rooney had failed to denounce the impeachment inquiry as “a witch hunt.” Party activists traded outraged texts. Some took their case directly to the congressman, protesting what they saw as an act of supreme disloyalty to a leader they say they have come to revere more than any in their lifetimes.

    “I told him, ‘You’ve betrayed your country, your president and your constituents,’?” said Doris Cortese, 80, the vice chair of the Lee County Republicans, recounting a conversation with Rooney.

    “My exact words to him were: “Get out.”

    Within hours, the longtime Republican insider had announced on Fox News his decision not to run again after two terms.

    National polls bear out the idea that Republicans are sticking with the president. A Washington Post average of surveys since mid-October finds more than 8 in 10 Democrats and nearly half of all independents favor impeachment. Both figures have jumped substantially in the past month, as the picture of Trump’s Ukraine dealings becomes more complete.

    But the Republican figure remains low, with just about one in 10 GOP voters backing the process.

  27. says

    Yahoo – “State Department agrees to turn over Ukraine documents, potentially providing Democrats with impeachment fodder”:

    The State Department has agreed to release documents related to President Trump’s handling of aid to Ukraine, potentially providing ammunition to the impeachment probe now being conducted by Democrats in the House of Representatives.

    The decision comes in response to a lawsuit filed by American Oversight, a watchdog group affiliated with progressive causes. That lawsuit was initially filed in the spring, after Trump dismissed U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie L. Yovanovitch….

    Last week, a U.S. District Court judge in Washington, D.C., told the State Department it had to turn over Ukraine-related documents, citing “public interest” that he said tilted “heavily in favor of disclosure.”

    The agreement between the State Department and American Oversight stipulates that the documents be turned over by Nov. 22, by which time the impeachment inquiry could well be in its public stage.

    Among the documents to be included in the trove are communications between departmental officials and Trump’s private lawyers and associates, in particular Rudolph Giuliani, Victoria Toensing or Joseph diGenova. Giuliani, the former mayor of New York, is believed to have led a “shadow” foreign policy in Kiev that involved exerting pressure on the new Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelensky, to announce a new investigation of Hunter Biden, who had sat on the board of Burisma, a Ukrainian energy company.

    The order also covers records created by or pertaining to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who has been criticized for putting Trump’s political prospects, and possibly his own business interests, over the nation’s foreign policy goals. Two close associates of Pompeo, Ulrich Brechbuhl and Brian Bulatao, are also named in the request, along with several others.

    The agreement will also require the State Department to turn over calendar entries pertaining to Yovanovitch’s dismissal, as well as any meetings with Giuliani, and meetings pertaining to a potential Biden investigation in Ukraine.

    The two sides could not agree on whether the State Department needed to turn over readouts of the July 25 phone call in which Trump is alleged to have engaged in a quid pro quo with Zelensky. State Department lawyers maintain those records “have a high likelihood of being classified and/or privileged.” The White House has released its own synopsis of the call, but not a complete transcript….

  28. says

    Reuters – “Islamic State vows revenge against U.S. for Baghdadi killing”:

    Islamic State confirmed on Thursday that its leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi was killed in a weekend raid by U.S. forces in northwestern Syria and vowed revenge against the United States.

    Baghdadi, an Iraqi jihadist who rose from obscurity to become the head of the ultra-hardline group and declare himself “caliph” of all Muslims, died during the swoop by U.S. special forces.

    Islamic State (IS), which held swathes of Iraq and Syria from 2014-2017 before its self-styled caliphate disintegrated under U.S.-led attacks, had previously been silent about Baghdadi’s status.

    It confirmed his demise in an audio tape posted online and said a successor it identified only as Abu Ibrahim al-Hashemi al-Quraishi had been appointed.

    Aymenn al-Tamimi, a researcher at Swansea University focusing on Islamic State, said the name was unknown but could refer to a leading figure in Islamic State called Hajj Abdullah whom the U.S. State Department had identified as a possible successor to Baghdadi.

    An IS spokesman addressed the United States in the tape.

    “Beware vengeance (against) their nation and their brethren of infidels and apostates, and carrying out the will of the commander of the faithful in his last audio message, and getting closer to God with the blood of polytheists,” he said.

    Baghdadi’s death is likely to cause Islamic State to splinter, leaving whoever emerges as its new leader with the task of pulling the group back together as a fighting force, according to analysts.

    Whether the loss of its leader will in itself affect the group’s capabilities is open to debate. Even if it does face difficulties in the leadership transition, the underlying ideology and the sectarian hatred it promoted remains attractive to many, analysts say.

    Islamic State also confirmed the death of its spokesman Abu al-Hassan al-Muhajir.

    “I think they’re trying to send the message, ‘Don’t think you’ve destroyed the project just because you’ve killed Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi and the official spokesman’,” Tamimi said.

    Islamic State has resorted to guerrilla attacks since losing its last significant piece of territory in Syria in March.

    Since Baghdadi’s death, it had posted dozens of claims of attack in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan and elsewhere.

    In his last audio message, released last month, Baghdadi said operations were taking place daily and urged freedom for women jailed in Iraq and Syria over their alleged links to the group.

    He also said the United States and its proxies had been defeated in Iraq and Afghanistan, and that the United States had been “dragged” into Mali and Niger.

  29. says

    Lindsey Graham tweeted: “If Turkish aggression against Tal Tamir and Kobani, Christian and Kurdish areas, continues, it will sever what’s left of the U.S. Congress/Turkish relationship. I would urge Turkey to stop and try to reset the relationship in a way that would be a win-win.”

    My hazy hypothesis: Trump has seen the public backlash against the pull-out and betrayal of the Kurds. He continues to smear them, but the military isn’t singing from the same hymnal. Graham, other congressional Republicans, and the Pentagon have gone all out to pressure him to reverse course, including waving the oil in front of him as a lure, and hoping Erdogan’s mocking, defiant determination to commit ethnic cleansing with Trump’s approval might push him to respond.

    I had thought the Christian leaders with whom Trump met this week also were possibly keeping up the pressure, but naturally they’ve again managed to dig below my already low bar for decency – Charlotte Observer – “‘They’re trying to impeach us’: What faith leaders told Trump behind closed doors”:

    …Some Christian leaders had urged Trump not to pull American troops out of Syria, where the Islamic State was targeting religious minorities, including Christians and Yazidis, and expressed dismay at Trump’s decision to abandon Kurdish allies that had fought to protect them.

    Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, told McClatchy earlier this month shortly after U.S. forces withdrew that Trump’s decision had “shaken” the evangelical community. Perkins also attended the October 29 meeting at the White House.

    But faith leaders are now claiming unity with the president, in light of the Baghdadi operation.

    “By and large, the strong feeling is that he made a pledge to not stay in these no-win conflicts and there’s been universal pleasure at the fact that he had the courage to make the decision on Baghdadi,” said Bauer, who was once a Republican candidate for president in 2000….

    They say this as Turkish-backed militias are attacking Christian towns in Syria. From the same article: “Faith leaders told President Donald Trump at a private meeting at the White House this week that they saw the Democrats’ impeachment efforts in Congress as an attack on their conservative agenda, several attendees told McClatchy.” Yes, let’s not forget who the real victims are.

  30. says

    Operation Inherent Resolve spokesman, 10 minutes ago: “We are repositioning @CJTFOIR forces to Deir ez Zor #Syria to continue partnering w/ #SDF to defeat ISIS remnants, protect critical infrastructure, & deny ISIS access to revenue sources. Mechanized forces provide infantry, maneuver, and firepower.”

    Sen. Van Hollen: “Trump’s envoy told me Turkey would suffer consequences if it’s proxies attacked beyond Pence-Erdogan ‘safe zone’.

    Just another empty threat.

    Turkish fighters are attacking with impunity beyond 30km line—but no action from Trump. Senate must hold Erdogan and Trump accountable.”

  31. says

    tomh @36, Republican Rep. Francis Rooney’s constituents sound like they are in a cult something like scientology. That’s bizarre.

  32. says

    Law.com – “‘Get the Job Done:’ Judge Wants Impeachment Witness Suit Quickly Resolved”:

    A Washington federal trial judge on Thursday set a speedy timeline for addressing questions over whether the Trump White House can lawfully block current and former top officials from speaking to House investigators leading the impeachment inquiry.

    U.S. District Judge Richard Leon was asked last week to assess a clash between Trump and congressional Democrats, an interbranch tug-of-war that flared up over a House subpoena seeking testimony from former national security adviser Charles Kupperman.

    During a half-hour hearing Thursday, Leon scheduled a Dec. 10 oral argument in Kupperman’s case, with filings due every two weeks from November until early December. At the end of the hearing, Justice Department attorney Elizabeth Shapiro that the government’s final deadline before the argument fell on Dec. 4, just days after Thanksgiving.

    Leon scoffed at her request for additional time, telling the career Justice Department litigator, “You’re obviously not familiar with this court.”

    For a matter of such public concern and consequence, he said, “you roll your sleeves up and get the job done.”

    “Vacations and other distractions take second place,” Leon said, adding that other Justice Department lawyers could work on the filing if Shapiro is unable to do so.

    “So get the job done,” he said.

    Leon isn’t approaching Kupperman’s case from a blank slate. He came to the bench in 2002 with a background in congressional investigations: Earlier in his career, Leon was counsel to Congress in investigations of three sitting presidents.

  33. says

    SC @32, this is so true: “It is hypocrisy at its finest to recognize a 100 years old genocide and to do almost nothing to prevent an ongoing one.”

  34. says

    From Steve Benen:

    I’m not sure why the right saw Morrison’s testimony as good news: “Tim Morrison, the top Russia and Europe adviser on President Trump’s National Security Council, on Thursday corroborated the testimony of a senior U.S. diplomat who last week offered House impeachment investigators the most detailed account to date for how Trump tried to use his office to pressure Ukraine to investigate former vice president Joe Biden, according to people familiar with his deposition.”

    Washington Post link

    […] Morrison told impeachment investigators that the account offered by William B. Taylor Jr., the acting ambassador to Ukraine, is accurate. He said that he alerted Taylor to a push by Trump and his deputies to withhold both security aid and a White House visit for the Ukrainian president until Ukraine agreed to investigate the Bidens and interference in the 2016 presidential election, said one person, who like others spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe sensitive discussions. […]

  35. says

    “Judge chides DOJ for trying to block star Mueller witness testimony”:

    A federal judge sharply challenged the Trump administration on Thursday over its objections to a House Democratic lawsuit trying to force the testimony of one of Robert Mueller’s star witnesses as part of their broader impeachment probe.

    Lawmakers have been fighting to bring in former White House counsel Don McGahn for questioning since he showed up repeatedly at the center of anecdotes detailing President Donald Trump’s potential obstruction of justice in the former special counsel’s final report. But the Justice Department has tried to block McGahn’s testimony, arguing that McGahn can essentially ignore a congressional subpoena related to his time in the White House, and that the courts shouldn’t weigh in on a dispute between Congress and the executive branch.

    U.S. District Court Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson on Thursday struggled to size up DOJ’s argument. The judge’s approach is being closely watched as her ultimate decision could have an effect on separate court battles over Democrats’ attempts to subpoena other reluctant witnesses as it investigates Trump’s attempts to pressure Ukraine into launching politically advantageous probes. During the hearing, Jackson directed several pointed questions at the Justice Department.

    “So what does checks and balances mean?” asked Jackson, an appointee of President Barack Obama, at one point during the court arguments.

    James Burnham, arguing for the Justice Department, replied that the dispute between the House Judiciary Committee and McGahn should not be resolved through litigation. He argued that the Constitution and more than two centuries of interactions between the White House and Congress hadn’t required courts to weigh in. And Jackson shouldn’t now, he said.

    “So the House can never go to court?” Jackson asked.

    “As a general proposition, that’s correct,” replied Burnham, a former White House aide under McGahn who is now serving in a senior position in DOJ’s civil division.

    Burnham insisted on a broad interpretation of the “absolute immunity” argument the Trump White House has been making in its fight against the House’s various impeachment-related oversight efforts. He said it extends both to former presidents and top White House aides, whom he called “the alter ego of the president.” Burnham said these aides shouldn’t be forced to answer questions via subpoena because they might reveal information protected under executive privilege.

    Facing a barrage of skeptical questions from Jackson, Burnham later conceded, “If you don’t think the president has absolute immunity that’s a serious problem for my argument.”

    Justice Department attorneys have asserted, as they have under previous administrations, that senior White House advisers like McGahn can essentially ignore subpoenas related to their official duties.

    There is no binding legal precedent on the point, but in a dispute a decade ago about President George W. Bush’s firing of U.S. attorneys, a district court judge rejected the White House’s claims of absolute immunity for one of his White House counsels, Harriet Miers. The case was settled in 2009 and never ruled on by an appeals court.

    During discussion of that prior ruling, Jackson seemed to signal that she was inclined to follow that decision unless the Justice Department can find some distinction.

    “I am not analyzing this on a blank slate,” Jackson said as Burnham began his argument. “We do have prior precedents from this very jurisdiction. … I’ve been really grappling with this: how today’s case differs from, let’s say, Miers?”

    Jackson also expressed discomfort with the Justice Department’s claim that McGahn and other former senior officials are entirely immune from a congressional subpoena, even though many such individuals regularly speak out in public.

    “I see all day, many of us do, all kinds of former executive branch officials giving information to the media,” Jackson said. “We understand that people do that even under circumstances in which they could not have done so, perhaps, if they were still in the White House.”

    Burnham eventually said he was not arguing that such disclosures are legal nor ruling out any effort to stop them.

    “We have not taken a position on that your honor. I am definitely not disclaiming that,” the Justice Department attorney said….

    Not sure I’m seeing the “chiding” described in the headline here.

  36. says

    Followup to SC’s comment 21.

    The two most active and highest-profile critics of Twitter’s decision to drop political ads are the Trump campaign and Russian state television.

  37. says

    Brett McGurk:

    It’s telling that mechanized units are deploying to guard oil fields. We NEVER deployed mechanized units to Syria over four brutal years of the ISIS campaign. This suggests planners believe the positions are vulnerable after we abandoned 2/3 of NE Syria.

    Mechanized units are more expensive, harder to sustain, and require more manpower than the SOF-focused mission we’ve had in Syria since 2015. So Trump is on track to spend MORE taxpayer money and deploy MORE troops for an ill-defined mission sewn from self-inflicted chaos.

    This larger US deployment comes in addition to the 14,000 US personnel deployed to the Middle East since May. So when Trump says he’s bringing troops home, he’s either ignorant of what’s happening under his command — or he’s lying.

    Despite this new force, we apparently stand helpless to deter war crimes and population displacement our sudden retreat across NE Syria unleashed. That’s happening under airspace the US reportedly still controls. Totally incoherent, indefensible, immoral.

  38. says

    Lynna @ #49, yeah, I saw Parscale whining about how they should next ban the “lies” from the “liberal media.” When it’s just an across the board prohibition on political advertising they can’t make their bullshit claims about bias, and he loses money. Too bad.

  39. says

    Apparently the NRCC sent some frontline Democrats ‘moving boxes’ after the impeachment vote, but because the boxes looked like suspicious packages, Capitol Police were called to investigate. So that’s neat.

    Pic from a source:…

    Apparently no one at the NRCC took a second to think whether sending congressional offices suspicious looking packages was a sound idea, which sounds about right.”

  40. tomh says

    @ #54
    I had to watch because otherwise I wouldn’t believe he actually said that, but yeah, what do you know, he did.

  41. says

    Guardian – “Kurds call on US to block Turkish military drones from Syrian air space”:

    Syrian Kurds are asking the Pentagon to block US-controlled air space over north-eastern Syria to Turkish armed drones which they claim are causing significant civilian casualties.

    Ilham Ahmed, the head of the Syrian Democratic Council (SDC) said the Kurds would hold the Pentagon responsible for Turkish war crimes if they did nothing to guarantee protection from the air.

    She told reporters during a visit to Washington that armed Turkish drones were a constant presence in the air above north-eastern Syria, striking at will against both military and civilian targets.

    “We have been promised by the United States on a couple of occasions that areas that have US forces will never be attacked by Turkey,” Ahmed said through a translator “However, we saw that the US did not fulfill its promise after the Turkish incursion.

    “Armed Turkish drones are still flying over our region and targeting anything they wish to,” Ahmed said.

    “We call on the Pentagon go to stop allowing Turkey to use Syrian air space,” she added. “We hold the Pentagon responsible for all the crimes committed by Turkey if they don’t block the air space.”

    Ahmed said said the SDC, which is the political arm of the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), had appealed to the Pentagon for help or an explanation but had heard nothing back.

    The SDC leader rejected claims by US officials that the ceasefire was holding in north-eastern Syria in the wake of a US troop withdrawal from the border area and a subsequent Turkish incursion.

    She said attacks by drones, artillery and Turkish-backed militias were continuing, and that since the start of the Turkish incursion, 509 civilians and 412 SDF soldiers had been killed in the area.

    From her meetings with US officials, Ahmed said she had statements saying “there is a will to stay” on the part of US forces.

    “But until when, why and for what we have no clear answer yet,” she said.

    Ahmed added that the deployment of US troops and armour to the oilfields around Deir Ezzor would do nothing for her people.

    “If the US forces are going to be remaining in the oilfields in the south when the Turks are attacking us from the north-west, where is the stability?” she asked. “How can we achieve security for the people?”…

    They’ve been asking for a no-fly zone all along.

  42. says

    Al-Monitor – “Iraqi Kurds spurn Turkish goods to back Syrian kinsmen”:

    Iraqi Kurds have launched wide boycotts of Turkish-made products in retaliation for Ankara’s military offensive in Syrian Kurdistan or Rojava, where the Turkish army and the Syrian rebel militias it supports are being accused by human rights groups of ethnic cleansing and war crimes.

    Many Kurds feel they have been abandoned by much of the world, including the United States, NATO and Russia, after they played a major role in defeating the Islamic State in Syria and Iraq. They say it is time to unite and use every available tool, including boycotts and demonstrations, to resist totalitarian aggressors.

    Social media activists in almost all Iraqi cities and towns of the Kurdish region and even Kurds in the diaspora have called for boycotting Turkish products and services, including tourism. Membership in one of the newly formed public groups on Facebook, Boycott Turkey, exceeded 218,000 within a week. Activists also have launched a website and formed teams of volunteers that visit local markets urging citizens to join the boycott.

    A Kurdish trader of Turkish foodstuffs in Sulaimaniyah, Iraq, who wished not to be named, told Al-Monitor his business has already declined because of the boycott. He’s no longer importing Turkish goods at this time, as buyers are rare.

    According to data from the Erbil-based Kurdistan Regional Government, about 1,400 Turkish companies operate in the region and the annual trade volume between Ankara and Erbil is between $10 billion and $12 billion. Turkey has yet to recover from US sanctions a year ago and Reuters reported that immediately after Turkey’s incursion into northeast Syria on Oct. 9, the Turkish lira fell to its weakest level in nearly four months. The boycott is expected to contribute to the economic decline.

    Sheikh Mustafa Abdul Rahman, chairman of the Iraqi Kurdistan Region’s General Union of Importers and Exporters, told Al-Monitor the boycott is sure to impact the sale of Turkish products, though it will take about six months to compile meaningful financial data on how the boycott affects bilateral trade. “Traders have begun to feel the boycott’s consequences, so most have decided not to import Turkish made goods,” he added.

    Abdul Rahman said the union supports the boycott: “We are with our people. Kurds should not do business with any state that harms human beings, humanity and Kurds.”

    He emphasized that the campaign will continue to promote buying local products or importing products from countries other than Turkey. The boycott applies to Turkish food, clothes, cosmetics, electronics and other goods, and locals are being urged not to vacation in Turkey. The campaign is even urging the KRG authorities to ban Turkish soap operas — which are dubbed into Kurdish — on local TV channels.

    “We also ask the KRG to impose high customs on imported Turkish products. Our campaign has been fruitful and effective, since the boycott is a national stance and people were widely responsive,” Ghalib said. He pointed out that within the past week, flights between the Kurdistan region and Turkey have been canceled due to a lack of passengers and the price of flights to Turkey has crashed….

  43. says

    Guardian – “Trump says Johnson and Farage could form ‘unstoppable force'”:

    Donald Trump has intervened in the UK’s nascent election campaign, calling on Boris Johnson to team up with Nigel Farage to form an “unstoppable force” and claiming Jeremy Corbyn would be “so bad for your country”.

    Speaking to Farage on LBC Radio, the US president also said Johnson’s Brexit deal could prevent the UK from agreeing a trade deal with the US.

    Trump said the US “can’t make a trade deal with the UK” under “certain aspects of the deal”, despite Johnson’s claims it would allow the UK to have an independent trade policy.

    One of Labour’s main attacks against Johnson has been that the prime minister would be too close to Trump and allow a sell-off of public services to US companies as the price of a trade deal, with the NHS potentially on the line.

    Trump told LBC listeners that he was not interested in buying the NHS, and criticised Corbyn as “so bad for your country”.

    “He’d be so bad, he’d take you in such a bad way. He’d take you into such bad places,” he added.

    Trump told Farage he had reservations over Johnson’s deal, because it could prevent trade with the US, but he denied Corbyn’s claims it would mean the NHS was up for sale to American health corporations.

    “I don’t even know where [it] started with respect to us taking over your healthcare system. I mean it’s so ridiculous. I think Corbyn put that out there, but to even think, it was never even mentioned, I never even heard it until I went over to visit with the Queen,” he said.

    During that trip, Trump had fuelled speculation that the US would want access to NHS contracts for US corporations by saying that “everything is on the table”. He later backtracked by saying: “I don’t see [the NHS] being on the table.”

    In remarks that are unlikely to be welcomed in Downing Street, Trump said Johnson was a “fantastic man and [the] exact right guy for the times”, and added that he could form an “unstoppable force” by pairing with Farage.

    Responding to the US president’s comments, Corbyn accused Trump of “trying to interfere in Britain’s election to get his friend Boris Johnson elected”.

    “It was Trump who said in June the NHS is ‘on the table’. And he knows if Labour wins US corporations won’t get their hands on it. Our NHS is not for sale,” Corbyn tweeted….

  44. says

    Maya Wiley: “The ‘prosperity’ gospel of #PaulaWhite joins the self dealing #Trump administration. According to the Orlando Sentinel Ed Bd ‘She’s trying to frighten believers with apocalyptic consequences if they don’t get in line behind this president’.”

    Link atl.

  45. says

    Matt Pearce:

    NEW: Katie Hill’s husband was shopping around “the whole story” about their divorce, shortly before naked photos of her were given to GOP consultants who had previously worked for Hill’s 2018 opponent, Steve Knight.

    With @finneganLAT:…

    A spokeswoman for Steve Knight just sent me his statement in response to our story about how former campaign advisors had received naked pictures of Katie Hill. The nuance he seems to be highlighting here is that they didn’t work for his *2018* campaign.

    The NRCC was also approached about the naked photos of Katie Hill before they were published, and an NRCC spokeswoman told us this morning that NRCC the committee “never shopped, possessed or circulated photos of Congresswoman Hill.”

    “I didn’t have to give them away,” one of the former Steve Knight advisors, who approached NRCC, told us about the naked photos of Katie Hill that he’d gotten. “They were all over the place.”

    La Times link atl.

  46. says

    Owen Jones re the story @ #58:

    Labour is not going to get a better endorsement than this.

    Given Jeremy Corbyn being Prime Minister means no free trade deal with the US, and no NHS being carved up, or workers’ rights and consumer, social and environmental protections being stripped to US standards, I’m not surprised Trump isn’t so keen on the bloke.

    Let’s be clear, US Presidents should not be interfering in Britain’s internal democratic affairs to help either political party, even if it’s the one you support.

    Which in this case is the Labour party.

    “Everything Trump Touches Dies” Season 5 now available on BritBox.

  47. says

    Corbyn: “Boris Johnson has spent months promising we’d leave the EU today. The failure to do so is his and his alone. Labour will get Brexit sorted by giving the people the final say within six months with the choice of a credible leave deal or remain. And we’ll carry out what you decide.”

  48. says

    From the new statement from the attorneys for the IC whistleblower:

    …Our client is legally entitled to anonymity. Disclosure of the name of any person who may be suspected to be the whistleblower places that individual and their family in great physical danger. Any physical harm the individual and/or their family suffers as a result of disclosure means that the individuals and publications reporting such names will be personally liable for that harm. Such behavior is at the pinnacle of irresponsibility and is intentionally reckless.

  49. KG says

    Lynna, OM@3, SC@5 on Trump and dogs (I’m just catching up after a couple of days away from the thread),

    My hypothesis is that Trump hates dogs because dogs hate Trump, and have shown it. Dogs have evolved (under artificial selection) to understand human body language and voice production and particularly, how a particular human being is likely to treat them. It’s hard to imagine the child or adolescent Trump not mistreating animals when he got the chance. I think Trump gives dogs the creeps, even if he puts on a false amiability.

  50. says

    David Ignatius in WaPo (it’s early morning on the 1st and I’m already using up one of my free articles) – “In Ukraine, the quid pro quo may have started long before the phone call”:

    …House investigators have been conducting a rapid, well-focused inquiry. But here are two nagging questions that I hope investigators can answer.

    What led to Trump’s first meeting on June 20, 2017, with Ukraine’s then-President Petro Poroshenko? Ukraine had hired the lobbying firm BGR Group in January 2017 to foster contact with Trump, but nothing had happened . . . and then the door opened. Why?

    On June 7, less than two weeks before Poroshenko’s White House meeting, Trump’s lawyer, Rudolph W. Giuliani, had visited Kyiv to give a speech for the Victor Pinchuk Foundation, headed by a prominent Ukrainian oligarch. While Giuliani was there, he also met with Poroshenko and his prosecutor general, Yuriy Lutsenko, according a news release issued by the foundation.

    Just after Giuliani’s visit, Ukraine’s investigation of the so-called black ledger that listed alleged illicit payments to former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort was transferred from an anti-corruption bureau, known as NABU , to Poroshenko’s prosecutor general, according to a June 15, 2017, report in the Kyiv Post. The paper quoted Viktor Trepak, former deputy head of the country’s security service, saying: “It is clear for me that somebody gave an order to bury the black ledger.”

    The New York Times reported in May 2018 that Ukraine had “halted cooperation” with Mueller’s investigation. The paper quoted Volodymyr Ariev, a parliament ally of Poroshenko, explaining: “In every possible way, we will avoid irritating the top American officials.”

    Was there any implicit understanding that Poroshenko’s government would curb its cooperation with the U.S. Justice Department’s investigation of Manafort, who would later be indicted by Mueller? [Was there an explicit understanding? – SC]

    Why was Marie Yovanovitch , the U.S. ambassador to Kyiv, fired in May? Trump, Giuliani and their allies had been attacking her since early 2018, but for what reason? Lutsenko, the Ukrainian prosecutor, told the Hill in March that she had given him a “do not prosecute” order, an incendiary charge that Donald Trump Jr. promptly echoed on Twitter. But Lutsenko later recanted, and the State Department said the story was a fabrication.

    So why were Trump and Giuliani so eager to dump the ambassador? Here’s what Yovanovitch said during her Oct. 11 testimony to House investigators: “Individuals who have been named in the press as contacts of Mr. Giuliani may well have believed that their personal financial ambitions were stymied by our anti-corruption policy in Ukraine.”

    The former ambassador may have been referring to Igor Fruman and Lev Parnas , two Giuliani clients who were indicted last month on suspicion of arranging secret contributions to help foreign governments. (Fruman and Parnas have pleaded not guilty.) Their biggest project, according to an Associated Press Oct. 7 story, was a plan to sell U.S. natural gas to Ukraine, aided by Giuliani and Energy Secretary Rick Perry’s lobbying of Naftogaz, the Ukrainian gas company….

  51. says

    Guardian – “What links a prison murder, a New York drug trial and the Honduras president?”:

    Despite several attempts against his life – poisoned food, a smuggled grenade – drug trafficker Nery López appeared calm as he spoke to the warden inside a maximum-security prison in western Honduras.

    He hardly seemed to notice when a guard wearing a ski mask entered the hallway, eyeing López as he reached for the keys on his belt.

    Moments later, the masked guard stepped aside from a heavy sliding door as a group of men in T-shirts and shorts burst in, one of them firing a handgun at López.

    A second man drew a long knife, hacking at the fallen trafficker before the gunman drew a second weapon and emptied another cartridge of bullets.

    Within hours of the 26 October murder, footage of the brazen attack had leaked on to social media, sending a shockwave of fear through the nation.

    The killing came just days after evidence seized from López helped a New York jury convict a former Honduran politician named Juan Antonio “Tony” Hernández on four counts of drug trafficking and related weapons charges.

    Tony Hernández is the brother of Honduras’s current president, Juan Orlando Hernández – and Lopez’s lawyer was quick to accuse the government of complicity in his client’s murder.

    “Juan Orlando [Hernández] silenced him,” said López’s lawyer, Carlos Chajtur. “That door opened on purpose.”

    The murder is the latest embarrassment for the US state department, which continues to ignore the haze of allegations around the Honduran government while pushing the country to cooperate in Donald Trump’s regional crackdown on migration.

    A week before the trial began, the two countries announced an agreement, allowing the US to send asylum seekers from third countries to the violence-torn Central American nation while their claim is processed. Similar deals have been drawn up with Guatemala and El Salvador.

    So, while US prosecutors in New York described a situation of “state-sponsored drug trafficking”, the state department has maintained a business-as-usual approach following Tony Hernández’s conviction.

    A day after the verdict, the top US diplomat in Honduras was photographed smiling with President Hernández at a military parade.

    The Honduran president also featured in the New York case, when prosecutors accused him of having received millions of dollars from drug traffickers, including a $1m bribe from Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán.

    Prosecutors accused Tony Hernández of conspiring to murder rival traffickers, including a massacre with a bazooka and machine guns that resulted in four deaths.

    Critics argue that López was murdered to avoid any possibility that he might someday testify in a US court – and to send a message to others who might do the same.

    “The first message is for those who are linked to drug trafficking in Honduras related to Tony Hernández, or Juan Orlando Hernández and their whole group – to show them that they or their family members will be murdered if they continue providing evidence,” said Dr Joaquín Mejía, a human rights lawyer who has studied violence in Honduras.

  52. says

    Here’s a link to today’s Guardian general election liveblog.

    Farage says Boris Johnson claims his plan is a great deal. But it isn’t. It is not Brexit, he claims.

    Farage says Michel Barnier, the EU’s chief Brexit negotiator, has been a much more brilliant negotiator than anyone on the UK side.

    The EU is heading for regulatory alignment, he says.

    And he says he is glad President Trump made it clear last night that the Johnson plan would obstruct a UK-US trade deal.

    The Johnson plan would give the UK all of the disadvantages of EU membership, but none of the advantages of being out.

    He says if the UK adopted that plan, it would trigger a campaign to rejoin the EU. And he says that campaign would succeed.

    Johnson should drop this deal, he says.

    Farage says the only way to solve the Brexit impasse is to create a leave alliance.

    That does not just mean Tories and the Brexit party, he says. He says there are other leavers who might join.

    He says, if that were to happen, they could become, as President Trump said yesterday, “an unstoppable force”.

    If that does not happen, the Brexit party will be the only party standing up for Brexit.

    He says it will make sure that every house in the land gets information about how the deal is a sell-out.

    And he says the party will contest every seat in Britain.

  53. says

    Greg Sargent:

    New Post/ABC poll:

    49% support impeachment *and removal,* versus 47% opposed

    Trump approval 20 points underwater, at 38/58

    Trump disapproval among independents: 57 (!!!)

    Striking findings from new Post/ABC poll.

    Support for impeachment *and removal*:

    Women: 56-40

    Moderates: 54-41

    College educated whites: 50-47

    College educated white women: 59-37

    Women and college educated whites want him gone. This gaping wound is holding over from 2018.

    Public hearings haven’t even begun.

  54. says

    Adam Klasfeld in Courthouse News – “Boom Times for Turkey’s Lobbyists in Trump’s Washington”:

    Some five years ago, Turkey’s soft power suddenly swelled in the United States as the country’s lobbyists and pro-government charities received millions in newfound funding.

    That was the same year that leaked tapes appeared to show then-Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan instructing his son Bilal to dump massive amounts of money tied to a multibillion-dollar money-laundering scheme.

    “Now, what I say is, you take everything that you have in the house out,” Erdoğan could be heard telling his son, in recordings quickly viewed by millions on YouTube and translated from Turkish by the now-shuttered Turkish newspaper, Zaman.

    “What can I have on me, Dad,” Bilal replied in that transcript. “There is your money in the safe.”

    Made public in March 2014, the tapes depicted Erdoğan fretting that Istanbul police conducted home raids on the top officials of his ruling Justice and Development Party and his then-ally Reza Zarrab, a gold trader charged with corrupting them. The Turkish government disputed its authenticity, but academic researchers doubted claims of doctoring.

    Zarrab would implicate Erdoğan in a bribery-fueled conspiracy to violate U.S. sanctions against Iran three years later in a New York federal courtroom — a development Erdoğan tried to head off by lobbying intensely with reported help from President Donald Trump and his attorney, Rudy Giuliani.

    A Courthouse News investigation of the spending spree undertaken by the Turkish government in that interval shows money flowing to roughly half a dozen Trump-linked lobbyists, law firms and pro-Turkey charities. The top five U.S. lobbying firms registered with the Turkish government, its agencies and proxies would see their budgets more than quadruple collectively, from more than $1.7 million in 2014 to more than $7.3 million in 2018.

    Gephardt Group, a longtime lobbyist for Turkey named for the Democratic congressman who founded it, cut ties with its government at the end of 2016. The new guard of registered Turkish agents that replaced Gephardt would be deeply tied to Trump and his associates.

    Budgets of pro-Turkey charities linked to both Erdoğan and Trump also ballooned during this period.

    Here is a breakdown of the top players in pro-Turkey lobbying and charity between 2014 and 2018….

    Much, much more atl. Very interesting report.

  55. says

    North Carolina State Senator Jeff Jackson:

    Check this out – it’s a video that shows political corruption in our state Senate happening *in real time.*

    First I point out that GOP leadership keeps canceling the veto override vote every time all the Dems are present – hoping they can catch us unaware and override the veto.

    THEN a Republican Senator stands up and says, “We’ll call [a vote] at the right time. I hope you’ll miss it.”

    Then all the Republican Senators erupt in laughter.

    (Corruption = comedy?)

    You can tell by my reaction that, in my view, he just made my case for me.

    Watch for yourself.

    And keep in mind: This isn’t just a harmless game. *It’s the reason there’s no budget in NC* – because they’ve opted for corruption instead of compromise for the last three months.

    To be clear:

    Repeatedly postponing a vote not because some members are absent but because all members are *present* isn’t just a dumb political game – it’s a failure of integrity.

    It’s petty corruption. And every day it continues it’s hurting our state. #CallTheVote

    Aaaand they just did it *again.*

    They brought us into session this morning, saw all the Dems were there, so they called a recess,

    then another,

    then another,

    then another,

    then another,

    and every time we came back all the Dems were there.

    So they cancelled the vote.

    Video atl.

  56. johnson catman says

    re SC @79: They did this shit on 9/11 in the NC House when the republicans had said there would be no votes and a lot of the democrats were attending memorial services. The fucking republicans in NC have NO SHAME. They will do everything they can to skew the vote in their favor.

  57. says

    Elizabeth Warren:

    Today, I’m releasing my plan to pay for #MedicareForAll. Here’s the headline: My plan won’t raise taxes one penny on middle-class families. In fact, we’ll return about $11 TRILLION to the American people. That’s bigger than the biggest tax cut in our history. Here’s how:

    Health care costs are rising and crushing families. And a serious diagnosis can financially ruin a middle-class family even if they have insurance. We let private insurance and drug companies profit from that pain. Enough. We need a system that reflects our values.

    The best plan is #MedicareForAll—the only plan that gives everyone in America full coverage, with the freedom to see any doctor, with no premiums, copays, and deductibles—so getting sick doesn’t mean you go broke. No restrictions, no surprises, no more bills.

    #MedicareForAll finally brings true choice to the health care system. The choice to see the doctor you want, to get the prescriptions you need, pick the job or start that small business you want without worrying about where your health insurance will come from.

    My #MedicareForAll plan would end the stranglehold of health costs on American families. It would return a whopping $11 trillion to families who will never pay another premium or medical bill. It would be one of the greatest federal expansions of middle-class wealth in history.

    Let’s get to the math! (All backed up by independent experts and economists.) First, we’re going to rein in the waste, inefficiency, and corporate profiteering by insurance and drug companies. And we’ll bring down out-of-control costs.

    Instead, we’re going to spend more on care itself. And thanks to getting rid of all the waste in the system, we can offer top-of-the-line care for all 331 million people in the U.S. for LESS than what we’ll pay if we do nothing to fix our broken system now.

    How is it paid for? Well, if you’re not in the top 1%, Wall Street, or a big corporation—congratulations, you don’t pay a penny more and you’re fully covered by #MedicareForAll.

    To cover the cost, we start by taking the money that employers are currently paying in the form of premiums to private insurance companies and have them pay it to Medicare instead.

    We cover the remaining $11 trillion largely with taxes on big corporations, Wall Street, and the top 1%—and enforcing the tax laws we have now. Add in a targeted cut to a Defense Dept slush fund and that’s it. You’ll find full details in my plan here: [link to her plan]

    Achieving #MedicareForAll isn’t going to be easy, but I’m in this race to fight for American families. In the coming weeks, I will also release a transition plan—and I will start lowering health care costs and increasing coverage as soon as I’m sworn in as president.

    I am fighting for #MedicareForAll. I have the only detailed plan to pay for it. And we are the only Democratic primary campaign that has laid out the true, full costs of any health care plan, Medicare for All or otherwise. I look forward to others doing the same.

  58. says

    From Warren’s introduction to her plan (linked @ #82):

    …That’s it. That’s the choice. A broken system that leaves millions behind while costs keep going up and insurance companies keep sucking billions of dollars in profits out of the system – or, for about the same amount of money, a new system that drives down overall health costs and, on average, relieves the typical middle class families of $12,400 in insurance premiums and other related health care costs.

    Not every candidate for president supports moving to a system of Medicare for All. Some who support Medicare for All will have different ideas about how to finance and structure it. And everybody knows that there must be a real transition. But you don’t get what you don’t fight for – and my view is clear.

    Every candidate who opposes my long-term goal of Medicare for All should explain why the “choice” of private insurance plans is more important than being able to choose the doctor that’s best for you without worrying about whether they are in-network or not. Why it’s more important than being able to choose the right prescription drug for you without worrying about massive differences in copays. Why it’s more important than being able to choose to start a small business or choose the job you want without worrying about where your health care coverage will be coming from and how much it will cost.

    Every candidate who opposes my long-term goal of Medicare for All should put forward their own plan to cover everyone, without costing the country anything more in health care spending, and while putting $11 trillion back in the pockets of the American people by eliminating premiums and virtually eliminating out-of-pocket costs. Or, if they are unwilling to do that, they should concede that they think it’s more important to protect the eye-popping profits of private insurers and drug companies and the immense fortunes of the top 1% and giant corporations, rather than provide transformative financial relief for hundreds of millions of American families.

    And every candidate who opposes my long-term goal of Medicare for All should put forward their own plan to make sure every single person in America can get high-quality health care and won’t go broke – and fully explain how they intend to pay for it. Or, if they are unwilling to do that, concede that their half-measures will leave millions behind.

    And make no mistake – any candidate who opposes my long-term goal of Medicare for All and refuses to answer these questions directly should concede that they have no real strategy for helping the American people address the crushing costs of health care in this country. We need plans, not slogans….

  59. says

    Amnesty – “Turkey: Hundreds arrested in crackdown on critics of military offensive in Syria “:

    Hundreds of people have been detained in Turkey for commenting or reporting on Turkey’s recent military offensive in northeast Syria and are facing absurd criminal charges as the government intensifies its crackdown on critical voices, said Amnesty International in a report published today.

    ‘We can’t complain’ reveals how last month’s offensive – Operation Peace Spring – was accompanied by a wave of repression in Turkey which swept up anyone who deviated from the government’s official line. Journalists, social media users and protesters have been accused of “terrorism” and subjected to criminal investigation, arbitrary detention and travel bans. If prosecuted and found guilty, they could face lengthy prison sentences.

    “As the tanks rolled across the Syrian border, the government took the opportunity to launch a domestic campaign to eradicate dissenting opinions from media, social media and the streets. Critical discussion on issues of Kurdish rights and politics has become even further off limits,” said Amnesty International’s Europe Director, Marie Struthers.

    “Language around the military incursion was heavily policed, and hundreds of people who expressed their dissenting opinions about Turkey’s military operation were rounded up and are facing investigations under anti-terrorism laws.”

    On 10 October, a day after the offensive began, Turkey’s broadcasting regulatory body (RTÜK) warned media outlets that there would be zero tolerance of “any broadcasting that may negatively impact the morale and motivation of […] soldiers or may mislead citizens through incomplete, falsified or partial information that serves the aims of terror”.

    On the same day, two journalists were detained. Hakan Demir of the daily newspaper Birgün was questioned over a tweet on the paper’s official Twitter account based on an NBC report stating that “Turkish warplanes have started to carry out airstrikes on civilian areas.”

    Meanwhile Fatih Gökhan Diler, managing editor of the Diken news website, was detained after publication of an article with the headline “SDF claim: two civilians lost their lives”. Both journalists were accused of “inciting enmity and hatred” before being released with overseas travel bans pending the outcome of criminal investigations.

    Police also burst into the home of journalist and human rights defender, Nurcan Baysal, at 5am on 19 October. She told Amnesty International: “Having my home raided and my children terrorized by 30 heavily armed, masked police officers simply for some social media posts calling for peace, shows the level of suppression of freedom of expression in Turkey.”

    It is not just Turkish journalists that have been targeted. On 25 October, President Erdoğan’s lawyers announced that they filed a criminal complaint against the director and editor of French magazine Le Point, following the publication of the October 24 issue which used the cover headline “Ethnic cleansing: the Erdoğan method” in its coverage of the military offensive. The lawyers claimed the cover is insulting to the president, a crime under Turkish law.

    In the first week of the offensive alone, 839 social media accounts were under investigation for “sharing criminal content” with 186 people reportedly taken into police custody and 24 remanded in pre-trial detention, according to official figures.

    One social media user, who was detained and accused of “propaganda for a terrorist organization” had retweeted three tweets, one of which read: “Rojava [the autonomous Kurdish area in northern Syria] will win. No to War”. Like others, these tweets did not come remotely close to constituting evidence of an internationally recognizable crime.

    He was given an overseas travel ban and required to report to a local police station twice a month. One lawyer told Amnesty International: “Using the words ‘war’, ‘occupation’, ‘Rojava’ has become a crime. The judiciary says ‘you cannot say no to war’.”

    “Operation Peace Spring” has also been used by the government as a pretext to escalate its crackdown on opposition politicians and activists….

    Within the first week of the military offensive at least 27 people, many of whom were affiliated with HDP, were detained in Mardin province on terrorism-related charges. Detainees included the elected mayor of the town of Nusaybin. The government later replaced her with the unelected district governor.

    On 12 October the Saturday Mothers, relatives of victims of enforced disappearances who have been holding peaceful vigils every Saturday since 2009 to remember their loved ones, were warned by police that they would break up the vigil “if they utter the word ‘war’”. The peaceful gathering was violently broken up as soon as the statement that criticized the military operation was read out.

    “Since the start of the military offensive, Turkey’s already entrenched atmosphere of censorship and fear has deepened, with detentions and trumped-up charges used to silence the few who dare to utter any challenge or criticism of ‘Operation Peace Spring’,” said Marie Struthers.

    “The Turkish authorities must stop gagging opinions they don’t like and end the ongoing crackdown. All charges and prosecutions of those targeted for peaceful expression of their opposition to Turkey’s military operations should be immediately dropped.”

  60. tomh says

    WaPo:
    Kudlow says he agrees with Trump that the impeachment process hurts stock market

    White House National Economic Council Director Larry Kudlow said Friday that he agrees with Trump that the impeachment inquiry is bad for the stock market.

    Kudlow was asked whether he agreed with the sentiment expressed by Trump in a Thursday tweet in which he said the “Impeachment Hoax is hurting our Stock Market.”

    “Yes, I think the impeachment story in fits and starts has hurt the stock market,” Kudlow told reporters at the White House. “I think President Trump is right.”

    He said this as the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq reached record highs today.

  61. says

    Excellent piece by Dahlia Lithwick in Slate – “Why I Haven’t Gone Back to SCOTUS Since Kavanaugh”:

    …What I have not acceded to is the routinization and normalization of the unprecedented seat stolen from President Barack Obama in 2016 for no reason other than Mitch McConnell wanted it, and could. And what I have also not acceded to is the routinization and normalization of an unprecedented seating of someone who managed to himself evade the very inquiries and truth-seeking functions that justice is supposed to demand. And so, while I cannot know conclusively what happened in the summer of 1982, or at the sloppy drunk parties in the years that followed at Yale, or in the falling-down summer evenings at tony D.C. law firms, or with the gambling debts, or with the leaked Judiciary Committee emails, I can say that given Senate Republicans’ refusal to investigate, acknowledge, or even turn over more than 100,000 pages of documents relating to Kavanaugh, it is surely not my job to, in the parlance of Justice Antonin Scalia, America’s favorite grief counselor, “get over it.”…

    Every day I feel like the country is failing to recognize the extent of women’s anger.

  62. says

    Wajahat Ali: “My wife and I received the total cost of Nusayba’s life saving liver transplant from last month: over $430K. If we didn’t have insurance from our wife’s work we would never be able afford that. No way my daughter would have made it. This is madness. Americans deserve better.”

  63. says

    Guardian – “Trump-Russia dossier author gave evidence to UK intrusion inquiry”:

    A report on Russian interference in British politics allegedly being sat on by Downing Street includes evidence from Christopher Steele, the former head of MI6’s Russia desk whose investigation into Donald Trump’s links with Moscow sparked a US political scandal.

    Steele made submissions in writing to parliament’s intelligence and security committee (ISC), it is understood. A counter-intelligence specialist, Steele spent his career tracking Russian influence operations around the world and investigated Alexander Litvinenko’s 2006 murder.

    The cross-party committee has been examining Russian interference in British politics for more than a year. It took evidence from both the UK’s spy agencies and experts on Kremlin intelligence and disinformation tactics such as Steele.

    Members examined claims that the Kremlin tried to distort the result of the 2016 EU referendum, starting work after the former prime minister Theresa May had warned that Russia was sowing discord by “weaponising information” in the UK.

    The report was due to be published on Monday. However on Thursday, Dominic Grieve, the MP who chairs the committee, accused Boris Johnson of sitting on the report – potentially preventing its publication before the general election.

    Downing Street is normally given 10 working days to clear an ISC report, to ensure it contains no classified matters, according to ISC sources – although No 10 has disputed this, saying the process typically takes six weeks.

    No 10 sources said that clearance was not expected to be given on Friday, leaving only Monday and Tuesday for the document to appear before parliament dissolves. It cannot be published when the Commons does not sit, meaning if approval is withheld it will not appear before next month’s general election, which has already prompted allegations by opposition politicians of a cover-up.

    Speaking in the House of Commons on Thursday, Grieve said no explanation had been given for the “apparent delay”, with the report passed to Downing Street on 17 October. Sources said Britain’s spy agencies had already signed off the report before it was passed to No 10 for final sign off.

    Two sources told BuzzFeed that British intelligence found no evidence of Russian meddling in either the 2016 referendum vote or the 2017 general election. [Hmm…] However, Steele’s involvement in the committee’s unpublished dossier raises the stakes considerably….

    The intelligence and security committee exists to provide cross-party oversight of the government’s security and intelligence activities. It meets weekly in secret at undisclosed locations, although its reports are made public.

    The committee’s inquiry in Russian activity in the UK began in November 2017, and research was commissioned from the intelligence agencies, while submissions were sought from third-party experts.

    Four months later, the novichok poisoning of Sergei and Yulia Skripal in Salisbury intensified the committee’s programme of work. Written evidence was collected by the end of June 2018, and oral hearings were held in the second half of 2018.

    The committee’s annual report said that members examined allegations about “Russia’s interference in the UK’s EU referendum and the possible interference with UK political parties’ data”.

    Experts who gave evidence were informed on Wednesday evening that the report was due to be published imminently. The decision to stop it from coming out is being seen inside Whitehall as unusual.

  64. says

    Moscow Times – “‘Putin’s Chef’ Ordered to Pay for Mass Child Poisonings”:

    A Moscow court has ordered catering magnate Yevgeny Prigozhin’s company to compensate the parents of schoolchildren who suffered food poisoning last year, Interfax reported Friday.

    The parents sued Prigozhin’s business alongside other companies, schools and officials this spring for the December 2018 dysentery outbreak in several state-run daycare centers and kindergartens. Officials confirmed 127 overall food poisoning cases that anti-corruption activists tied to Prigozhin, who is widely labeled “Putin’s chef” for organizing banquets for the Russian president.

    The Meshchansky district court ruled Thursday that the Vito-1 and Concord food processing companies (the latter is registered under Prigozhin’s name) pay the parents 300,000 rubles ($4,700), Interfax reported.

    “They awarded 10,000-15,000 [rubles] per child,” Interfax quoted prominent anti-corruption lawyer Lyubov Sobol as saying.

    Parents can decide to appeal the ruling because the compensation is too meager, Sobol said in a video outside the courthouse shared on Twitter.

    The court struck down the parents’ claims against the Moscow city administration and its officials, Interfax reported.

    Companies linked to Prigozhin have signed nearly 5,400 state contracts worth $3.2 billion with the military, schools and hospitals since 2011, the U.S.-funded Current Time news channel reported this year.

    The Associated Press reported that Prigozhin has won $2 billion in Moscow school food-supply contracts since 2009.

    Three of Prigozhin’s entities, including his Concord catering business, were indicted in the U.S. over an alleged criminal and espionage conspiracy to tamper with the country’s presidential election. The U.S. special prosecutor also personally charged Prigozhin.

    Reports have also linked Prigozhin to Russia’s push for influence in Africa and deployments of private mercenaries in Syria and Ukraine.

  65. says

    Guardian – “Brazilian president’s son suggests using dictatorship-era tactics on leftist foes”:

    Voices from across Brazil’s political spectrum have condemned the son of the far-right president, Jair Bolsonaro, after he suggested hardline dictatorship-era tactics might be needed to crush his father’s leftist foes.

    Eduardo Bolsonaro made the incendiary remarks – which many observers suspect were a deliberate distraction from renewed media speculation over the family’s links to organized crime – during a softball YouTube interview broadcast on Thursday.

    In the interview the 35-year-old congressman claimed – without offering evidence – that the recent wave of Latin American protests and the left’s return to power in Argentina were part of a Cuba-funded conspiracy to bring “revolution” to Latin America.

    “If the left radicalizes to this extent [in Brazil] we will need to respond, and that response could come via a new AI-5,” said Bolsonaro, who is the regional representative of Steve Bannon’s far-right group “The Movement”.

    That was a reference to one of the most traumatic events in recent Brazilian history – December 1968’s Institutional Act Number Five (AI-5) – when Brazil’s military rulers moved to extinguish growing political unrest by indefinitely outlawing freedom of expression and assembly and closing congress.

    In a country still grappling with the legacy of those grim days of authoritarian rule, Bolsonaro’s provocation – for which he later offered a partial apology – sparked outrage, from left to right.

    The controversy caps an anarchic week in Brazilian politics.

    In the early hours of Wednesday Brazil’s president launched a furious tirade against the “putrid” press from a hotel room in Saudi Arabia. That outburst came after Brazil’s top broadcaster revealed the investigation into the 2018 assassination of the leftist politician Marielle Franco suggested the suspects had met at Bolsonaro’s compound before the attack.

  66. says

    There’s a new Crooked Media podcast – “Rubicon: The Impeachment of Donald Trump.”

    I don’t think it’s on the Crooked site yet, but there’s a link to the first episode, featuring an interview with Matthew Miller, here.

  67. says

    Natasha Bertrand in Politico – “Testimony: White House lawyer told Vindman not to discuss Ukraine call”:

    The senior White House lawyer who placed a record of President Donald Trump’s July 25 call with Ukraine’s president in a top-secret system also instructed at least one official who heard the call not to tell anyone about it, according to testimony heard by House impeachment investigators this week.

    Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, a decorated Army officer who served as the National Security Council’s director for Ukraine, told lawmakers that he went to the lawyer, John Eisenberg, to register his concerns about the call, in which Trump asked Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate the Bidens, according to a person in the room for Vindman’s deposition on Tuesday.

    Eisenberg recorded Vindman’s complaints in notes on a yellow legal pad, then conferred with his deputy Michael Ellis about how to handle the conversation because it was clearly “sensitive,” Vindman testified. The lawyers then decided to move the record of the call into the NSC’s top-secret codeword system—a server normally used to store highly classified material that only a small group of officials can access.

    Vindman did not consider the move itself as evidence of a cover-up, according to a person familiar with his testimony. But he said he became disturbed when, a few days later, Eisenberg instructed him not to tell anyone about the call—especially because it was Vindman’s job to coordinate the interagency process with regard to Ukraine policy.

    Eisenberg’s decision to move the call record to the codeword system following his conversation with Vindman was first reported by The Washington Post. But Eisenberg’s subsequent request that Vindman not disclose the content of the call to anyone has not been previously reported.

    Several National Security Council officials had complained to Eisenberg in the weeks leading up to the July 25 call about the shadow Ukraine policy being run by Giuliani and U.S. Ambassador to the E.U. Gordon Sondland. Those include Vindman’s then-boss Fiona Hill, who went to Eisenberg at the instruction of then-National Security Adviser John Bolton.

    It’s not clear whether Eisenberg, who has a legendary reputation for secrecy, ever took those concerns up the chain to his boss in the White House counsel’s office, Pat Cipollone….

  68. says

    Guardian letter – “We stand in solidarity with Rojava, an example to the world”:

    Leaders from social movements, communities and First Nations from around the world, including LaDonna Brave Bull Allard, Eve Ensler and Stuart Basden on the Turkish invasion in north-east Syria

    What is at stake in north-east Syria is more than the fate of the Kurdish people or the autonomous homeland of Rojava or even the fight against Isis. What is at stake is humanity’s ability to survive our current civilisational crisis and to imagine new alternatives before it’s too late.

    Turkish prime minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s brutal invasion of Rojava is using 20th-century techniques of extreme violence and genocide, despite a proclaimed “ceasefire”….

    The US, the UK, France, Russia and other alleged superpowers are actively betraying both international law and the Geneva convention by allowing and facilitating the ethnic cleansing and occupation of Rojava. Turkey’s aim is clear: to eradicate what all fascist powers fear most, a free people daring to create brave and successful experiments outside the globalised, extractive system.

    Since 2012, around 5 million people – Kurds, Arabs, Assyrians, Turkmen, Yazidis and others – have built the autonomous region of Rojava, demonstrating how a multi-ethnic society can respectfully coexist beyond the constraints of nation state, patriarchy and capitalism. By promoting radically democratic and decentralised self-governance, equity between genders, regenerative agriculture, a justice system based on reconciliation and inclusion of minorities, the Rojava experiment has presented a living example of possibility under the most impossible of circumstances. We encourage readers to review the Rojavan Charter of the Social Contract for inspiration.

    Western leaders are feigning empathy while American, German and British weapon manufacturers are actively selling weapons to Turkey. It is clear that the dominant system cannot and will not defend those seeking to explore other ways of knowing and being….

    However, a growing chorus of allies are rising up around the world. From Haiti to Lebanon, from Chile to Iraq, from Cameroon to the US, from the UK to Hong Kong, social revolutions are confronting the rise of fascism, short-termism, greed, climate destruction and warfare that are required to prop up our existing economic paradigm. The battle lines are becoming clearer. Domination versus cooperation, colonisation versus autonomy, oppression versus freedom, patriarchy versus partnership – these values are the warp and weft of the defining struggle for the future of humanity.

    For Rojava to survive and for justice to truly prevail, those rising up in their local context must stand together creatively with shared voice, values and visions for global systems change. Rojava is fighting for the same reasons as the awakening majority from around the world. It has shown that the way out of social and ecological crisis is not through GDP-focused “development”, but rather with decentralised autonomous communities.

    Making such communities work in more and more places, by regenerating ecosystems, healing our collective trauma and creating social structures of solidarity and trust, is the transformational work of our times. Once we see our struggles as inherently interdependent with each other, and with the web of life itself, no army on the planet will be able to stop the inevitable transition.

    As leaders from social movements, communities and First Nations from around the world, we stand in solidarity with the vision and work of Rojava. We pray for their resilience, protection and perseverance. We pray that we will listen to and learn from the living Earth as she continues to show us how to create societies which live in cooperation with all beings. We pray that those in positions of power be reminded of their humanity and end this invasion immediately.

  69. says

    Mustafa Bali responds to Sen. Van Hollen @ #42 above: “The attacks have never been ceased, Senator @ChrisVanHollen, as you point out in your tweet. The scale of attacks reached far beyond the cease-fire zone inc. Kobani and Til Temir. However, we are still hopeful that the US promises re. stopping the invasion will be kept.”

  70. says

    Recommended podcast episodes:

    “Deconstructed Special: The Noam Chomsky Interview”:

    Legendary linguist, activist, and political theorist Noam Chomsky has been speaking out against U.S. interventionism from Vietnam to Latin America to the Middle East since the 1960s. He’s the most cited author alive, but you won’t see him on the nightly news or in the pages of most major newspapers. On this week’s Deconstructed, Chomsky sits down with Mehdi Hasan to discuss the impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump, the 2020 Democratic field, and why he opposed Trump’s Syria troop withdrawal.

    Josh Marshall podcast – “Ep. 91: A Must-Listen Interview With Filmmaker Errol Morris”:

    Oscar-winning documentary filmmaker Errol Morris talks about his new documentary about Steve Bannon, “American Dharma.” It’s a contentious interview about a provocative film.

  71. says

    Independent – “‘It’s like nothing we have come across before’: UK intelligence officials shaken by Trump administration’s requests for help with counter-impeachment inquiry”:

    …The attorney general is focusing on the theory, aired on far-right conspiracy sites, and raised by Trump and Giuliani, that Ukraine framed Vladimir Putin over the US election in a complex triple-cross operation by impersonating Russian hackers.

    Trump and Barr have also been asking other foreign governments for help in investigating the FBI, CIA and Mueller investigators. The US president has called on the Australian prime minister Scott Morrison for assistance, while the attorney general has been on similar missions to the UK and Italy.

    And the information being requested has left allies astonished. One British official with knowledge of Barr’s wish list presented to London commented that “it is like nothing we have come across before, they are basically asking, in quite robust terms, for help in doing a hatchet job on their own intelligence services”….

  72. says

    CNN – “‘I’m the best-paid interpreter in the world’: Indicted Giuliani associate Lev Parnas touted windfall from Ukrainian oligarch”:

    Earlier this year, Lev Parnas, the indicted associate of Rudy Giuliani, received a sudden windfall of money from a prominent Ukrainian oligarch who is fighting extradition to the United States and is suspected of having ties to the Russian mob, according to four sources who spoke with Parnas.

    This summer, Parnas told potential business associates that his company began receiving payments from the oligarch, Dmytro Firtash, who is living in Austria while fighting bribery charges in the US, the sources told CNN.

    Parnas also told these people he met with Firtash several times over the summer while in Vienna. In June, according to one of these sources, Parnas vouched to Firtash for two well-known Washington lawyers who later brought up Firtash’s plight in a face-to-face meeting with Attorney General William Barr.

    These new details appear to reveal a much more substantial relationship than previously known between Parnas and Firtash, and how Firtash’s years-long extradition battle suddenly collided with Giuliani’s push to dig up dirt on President Donald Trump’s political opponents.

    They could also raise the stakes for Giuliani, whose financial ties are being examined by federal investigators. A company owned by Parnas paid Giuliani $500,000 for consulting in the fall of 2018.

    Giuliani maintains that the money did not originate overseas.

    CNN previously reported that a counterintelligence probe of Giuliani is also underway. Giuliani has maintained he’s acted appropriately in the interests of his client, President Donald Trump.

    In private conversations with would-be business associates before his arrest this month, Parnas boasted that his newfound luxurious lifestyle was bankrolled by Firtash, two sources told CNN. Beginning in mid-August, this included around-the-clock bodyguards, two luxury SUVs for his entourage, and at least six private charter flights in the past several months, according to the sources as well as documents exclusively obtained by CNN.

    This summer Firtash shook up his legal team, which had been led by Lanny Davis, the well-known Washington lawyer who was special counsel for President Bill Clinton, and represented Trump’s former personal attorney Michael Cohen.

    Parnas played a pivotal role in Firtash’s decision to replace Davis with Joseph diGenova and Victoria Toensing, according to a source with direct knowledge of the situation.

    Parnas vouched for them directly to Firtash at a meeting in Vienna in June, specifically touting their personal ties to Giuliani, a source close to the lawyers told CNN.

    The husband and wife legal duo are well-known Republicans, frequent defenders of Trump on cable news and nearly joined Trump’s legal team last year. diGenova says he’s known Barr for 30 years— connections that could prove valuable in Firtash’s ongoing extradition fight.

    A source with knowledge of the meeting told CNN that Parnas was the middleman who, a month after the Vienna meeting, formally met with Firtash’s legal team as well as diGenova and Toensing back in the US.

    The July meeting took place at the Trump International Hotel in Washington. Present were Parnas, Fruman, diGenova, Toensing and two other Firtash representatives, a source with knowledge told CNN. Also in attendance, the source said, was David Correia, one of Parnas’ business partners who was also indicted in the campaign finance conspiracy.

    At some point shortly before that meeting, the deal was sealed. Toensing and diGenova joined Firtash’s legal team and, they later met personally with Barr and other Justice Department officials, where they asked for the criminal case against Firtash to be dropped. The Washington Post was first to report the meeting, and that Barr declined to get involved.

    Associates noticed a change after Parnas returned to Boca Raton from his summer meetings with Firtash, sources close to the situation told CNN.

    Whereas one year earlier, Parnas was telling his wealthy contacts that he was short on cash and needed loans, he was now living the high life — surrounded by bodyguards, traveling in luxury SUVs and jetting up and down the East Coast on private chartered planes.

    …Between August 23 and October 6, Parnas and Fruman used their company, Global Energy Producers, to pay for six private flights up and down the East Coast, according to documents obtained by CNN.

    Parnas told some associates that Firtash was funding the flights, those three sources told CNN. He also told some of them that Firtash was now paying all the expenses for Global Energy Producers.

    According to flight manifests obtained by CNN, Giuliani and his friends and family joined Parnas and Fruman on a flight from Florida to New Hampshire in late January. [What were they doing in New Hampshire? – SC]

    The next month, on October 4, shortly after House Democrats requested documents from Parnas and Fruman, flight records show that Parnas chartered a jet to Cape Cod. Parnas told two sources that he was there to meet his lawyer John Dowd, who previously represented Trump during the Mueller investigation….

    More atl.

  73. says

    This detail from Ema O’Connor’s BuzzFeed report on Igor Fruman’s failed attempt to get his bail conditions amended:

    …On the way out of the federal courthouse in downtown New York, [Fruman’s attorney Todd] Blanche shook his head, seeming defeated. When BuzzFeed News asked him for his card in order to get the spelling of his name correct, he responded, “I wish you wouldn’t spell my name right. I wish I had one of my colleague’s cards to give you instead. Lord.”

    Ultimately, he gave BuzzFeed News his business card.

  74. says

    Daniel Dale (for some reason I can’t get the entire thread @ #103 at one time or find the beginning of the second half – it was a grievance fest): “This was an interesting moment tonight: Trump complaining about not getting enough coverage for his the death of Baghdadi, then seguing to a dog getting more attention than him, while repeatedly adding that he is ‘happy’ the dog is getting the attention.”

    Within hours if not minutes of Milley saying during the Pentagon briefing that they wouldn’t be releasing a picture or the name of the dog because it would compromise security, Trump had tweeted out a picture. Shortly thereafter, he casually revealed the dog’s name, hinting that the dog might be visiting the White House. He resents and hates this dog, and I hope they can keep the dog away from him or only allow heavily supervised interactions with this petty, cruel, abusive man.

  75. says

    Kurdistan 24 – “Syrian Kurdish officials reject Assad’s plans to control autonomous territory”:

    Despite having reached a deal with Damascus for national troops to counter the recent Turkish military incursion into northern Syria, top Kurdish officials continue to reject plans by President Bashar al-Assad to bring autonomous Kurdish-controlled areas under his authority.

    “The Kurds have never ruled over anyone and never assimilated any Syrian component with a history, culture, and identity. On the contrary, the Kurds were the first Syrians who were oppressed and denied,” read a statement released on Friday by Aldar Xelil, the head of the Diplomatic Relations Office for the Movement for a Democratic Society (TEV-DEM).

    “Today, the Kurds seek to resolve their cause by resolving the issue of all those who were treated in the same manner,” he added. “The consideration is that there is no single solution to a host of problems, so the suitable proposition was the Democratic Nation; this in one aspect preserves and supports the plurality and diversity of Syria.”

    The Kurdish-led administration in earlier failed talks with Damascus called for a degree of self-autonomy but Damascus insisted on a full return of all territory within Syrian borders to the central government.

    Local authorities, however, are in a much weaker position since being forced to make a deal with the Syrian government to deploy national forces to protect the border against Turkish attacks that began on Oct. 9….

    The Syrian army there doesn’t appear to be well armed.

  76. says

    The Hill – “Washington Nationals player says he won’t visit Trump White House: ‘I just can’t do it'”:

    Washington Nationals pitcher Sean Doolittle will not visit the White House with his teammates when President Trump hosts the club to celebrate their World Series victory.

    Doolittle, a relief pitcher who joined the Nationals in 2017, told The Washington Post on Friday that he will not attend a White House ceremony scheduled for Monday because of his opposition to Trump.

    “There’s a lot of things, policies that I disagree with, but at the end of the day, it has more to do with the divisive rhetoric and the enabling of conspiracy theories and widening the divide in this country,” Doolittle said.

    “My wife and I stand for inclusion and acceptance, and we’ve done work with refugees, people that come from, you know, the ‘shithole countries,’ ” he added, referencing remarks Trump made in 2018 about immigrants coming from Haiti and other African nations.

    Doolittle went on to say that “as much as I wanted to be there with my teammates and share that experience with my teammates, I can’t do it.”…

  77. says

    I read this Reuters piece – “Exclusive: Overhaul of Ukraine prosecution agency buries Manafort inquiries – investigators” – yesterday, and I’m having a hard time buying some of these investigators’ claims. The Yanukovych/Manafort investigations have been going on for five years, they stopped cooperating with Mueller a year and a half ago (see #71 above), and yet somehow they “had been ‘within weeks’ of announcing official suspects” in the Manafort case? This quote, from someone who was allegedly within weeks of bringing charges, is something else:

    “At least 50% of the information… is in the investigator’s head, it doesn’t fit into the official paperwork,” said Andriy Rodionov, a senior investigator in the unit who is still on staff after passing the mandatory exam. “Any handing over of these cases is an automatic burial of them.”

    That’s simply ludicrous, and if it’s really how they’ve operated they are desperately in need of reforms.

    It seems like they’re trying to present Giuliani’s visit as the causal factor rather than Zelenskyy’s administration moving to reform the prosecutor’s office after they came to power. I could be wrong, but I’m skeptical.

  78. says

    CNN – “Confusion reigns over US plan to ‘secure the oil’ in Syria as commanders await orders”:

    US military commanders overseeing Syria operations are still waiting for precise battlefield orders from the White House and Pentagon on their exact mission to protect oilfields in eastern Syria, according to a defense official directly familiar with the matter.

    Nearly three weeks after President Donald Trump ordered troops out of northern Syria, publicly declaring he was taking “control” of the oil and sending troops and armored carriers to protect it from ISIS, US commanders lack clarity on the most basic aspects of their mission, including how and when troops can fire their weapons and what, exactly, that mission is.

    The lack of precise orders means troops are on the ground while critical details are still being worked out — exactly where they will go, when and how they will stay on small bases in the area, and when they go on patrol.

    Perhaps most crucially, there is no clarity about exactly who they are operating against in the oilfields.

    That’s essential information for troops on the ground and in the air to understand circumstances in which they are permitted to fire their weapons. It’s also crucial for military planners to understand how many US combat ground forces and aircraft are needed, the official said.

    The precision that’s lacking is vital for military commanders, who need specific, legal orders that are not subject to interpretation in moments of crisis.

    Privately, military officials say there is nothing in place to address the possibility that Syrian or Russian tanks or aircraft might approach the oil fields. The plan for now, officials say, is to declare the US presence and warn other players not to get close.

    The very decision to add more troops and fighting vehicles appeared to be a reversal of Trump’s initial emphatic declaration that the US was getting out. The shift came after security officials and Republicans critical of the President’s decision appeared to convince him to act more robustly to defend the oil.

    “Our professional military officers and diplomats don’t want to leave Syria,” said Wechsler, now Director of the Rafik Hariri Center and Middle East programs at the Atlantic Council. He noted that the arguments that traditionally resonate with presidents — including maintaining American credibility and deterrence, countering terrorism and thwarting Iran, “these don’t seem to resonate strongly with this president.”

    The one argument that does work for Trump: the oil.

    “It’s the only argument that resonates with the President and thus becomes the excuse that we need to keep forces there to protect other interests,” Wechsler said. While the oil justification seems to have worked, “using it as an excuse opens up a whole series of other questions,” he noted.

    Among them, Wechsler says, are what the legal basis for the US presence is, especially since the Assad government hasn’t asked for it? What exactly is the mission? What are the rules of engagement beyond self-defense? How does the US define success?

    Speaking to Chicago policemen on Oct. 28, Trump didn’t offer answers to those questions. He said the US didn’t want to be a policeman” in the region, but added, “we’re keeping the oil. Remember that. I’ve always said that. Keep the oil. We want to keep the oil.”

    The statement won praise from Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, who told state TV on Thursday that Trump is the best of the US presidents because he is “the most transparent.”

    “All the US Presidents commit crimes, but get Nobel prizes, and act like defenders of human rights and the noble unique US values — or Western values — but they are a group of criminals who act on behalf of lobbies,” Assad said. Trump’s declaration that “‘we want the oil’ — at least that’s honest,” the Syrian dictator said.

    Trump made his remarks to the Chicago police after telling reporters he was considering making a deal with a US oil company to go into Syria. It remains unclear what legal basis the US government would have for controlling or taking the oil in Syria.

    But the President has made it clear he is willing to see US troops fight for it. “We are leaving soldiers to secure the oil. And we may have to fight for the oil. It’s okay,” Trump said Oct. 27 at the White House. “Maybe somebody else wants the oil, in which case they have a hell of a fight.”

    Esper has publicly offered potentially differing language on the mission with few details on how US troops will actually operate.

    “We will secure oil fields to deny their access to ISIS and other actors in the region and to ensure the SDF has continued access because those resources are important,” he said Thursday.

    When asked if that means the US will “take” the oil fields, as Trump has said, Esper responded with somewhat unusual wording. “I interpret that as deny ISIS access to the oil fields,” he said.

  79. says

    Avi Bueno:

    Mississippi Senator Cindy Hyde-Smith says of socialism: “it may be alive & well in the heart of Nancy Pelosi but it is dead in Mississippi.”

    These claims from red states stun me because they’re deeply socialist.

    For example, Mississippi is historically #1 in food stamp use.

    Mississippi is also consistently one the most federally dependent states in the country.

    They take massive amounts of money from the federal government – far more than what they pay in taxes.

    Mississippi residents literally receive redistributed tax money from wealthier states.

    Here’s the video of Mississippi Senator Cindy Hyde-Smith saying that socialism “is dead in Mississippi”, full well knowing that her state is one of the, if not the, most federally dependent state in the country….

  80. says

    Yahoo – “Children were told to ‘build the wall’ at White House Halloween party”:

    A Halloween party on Oct. 25 at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building featured candy, paper airplanes and — concerning for some attendees — a station where children were encouraged to help “Build the Wall” with their own personalized bricks.

    Photos of the children’s mural with the paper wall were provided to Yahoo News.

    The party, which took place inside the office building used by White House staff, included the families of executive-branch employees and VIP guests inside and outside government. Even though many of the attendees were members of President Trump’s administration, not everyone thought the Halloween game was a treat.

    “Horrified. We were horrified,” said a person who was there and requested anonymity to avoid professional retaliation.

    Large letters on the display spelled out “Build the Wall.” Kids dressed as superheroes and ninjas were given brick-colored paper cards and told to write their name with a marker and tape them to the wall. Alongside the paper wall were signs including one that read “America First,” a slogan often used by President Trump that had been criticized because it was previously employed by the Ku Klux Klan.

    Earlier in the week offices inside the EEOB had been instructed to put together kid-friendly displays for trick-or-treaters. The displays were supposed to be interactive and inspiring, and all were supposed to address the party’s theme: “When I grow up I want to be…”

    Photos atl.

  81. lumipuna says

    Last month in the US Middle Eastern adventures

    Erdogan to Trump: “Listen, I’m seriously gonna invade northeast Syria now. It’s all just terrorists out there. You know there’s no point starting a war between us NATO allies over that patch of sand. You should order a US withdrawal from there, to prevent any misunderstandings or accidental hits on US troops. You can frame it as quitting stupid foreign wars, as you’ve sometimes promised you’d do.”

    Trump: “OK, whatever.” announces a super hasty withdrawal

    US troops in NE Syria as Turkey invades: ????????

    Special ops command: “Fuck, now we gotta finish the Baghdadi hunt fast. Sucks that you can’t tell Mr. Twitter-Stream-of-Thought about secret ops.”

    US media: “We’re shamefully abandoning our Kurdish allies in Syria. A genocide is impending as Turkey invades, and ISIS might resurge…”

    Trump to media: “We’re quitting the stupid war in Syria. ISIS has been defeated, thanks to me. Let the Kurds fight their own wars, it’s part of traditional culture over there and they were always lousy allies anyway. We’re bringing our troops home from Syria!”

    Pence to media: “We have reached an agreement with Turkey that the Kurds will be kept safe as long as they agree to run away from advancing Turkish troops.”

    US media: “Our troop engagement in Syria remains at a roughly constant level, while other troops are being contracted out to protect Saudi Arabia…”

    Aide to Trump: “We got Baghdadi, the ISIS leader. You should come quickly for a war room photo op, because this is a major PR opportunity.”

    Trump at rallies: “Thanks to me, and our great troops and even greater service dogs in Syria, we were able to brutally execute a weeping coward, I think he tried to surrender at the last moment. You can trust me, we wiped his remains from the walls with a copy of the Geneva Convention!”

    Rally crowd: “BLOOD AND GUTS! BLOOD AND GUTS!”

    Esper to Trump: “It’s best to emphasize that our ongoing presence in Syria is a good thing and necessary to prevent any resurgence of ISIS. For example, these oil pipelines in eastern Syria need to be guarded against terrorist attacks…”

    Trump at rallies: “Our great troops in Syria are taking over the oil fields over there, because we have to get something out of all this hassle. We’re taking the oil! All the oil are belong to us!”

    Rally crowd: “DRILL BABY DRILL!”

    Assad: “Spoken like an honest crook, and I know about these things”

    Esper to media: “He didn’t mean we’re taking the oil.”

    US military command in Syria: ????????

  82. says

    BuzzFeed – “The Mueller Report’s Secret Memos”:

    The 448-page report issued by then–special counsel Robert Mueller last March was the most hotly anticipated prosecutorial document in a generation, laying out the evidence of Russia’s interference in the 2016 election and the Trump administration’s efforts to obstruct the inquiry. That report, however, reflects only a small fraction of the billions of primary-source documents that the government claims Mueller’s team may have amassed over the course of its two-year investigation.

    Those documents are a crucial national legacy, a key to understanding this important chapter in American history. But the public has not been allowed to see any of them. Until now.

    Beginning last April, BuzzFeed News has pursued five separate Freedom of Information Act lawsuits to pry loose all the subpoenas and search warrants that Mueller’s team executed, as well as all the emails, memos, letters, talking points, legal opinions, and interview transcripts it generated. In short, we asked for all the communications of any kind that passed through the special counsel’s office. We also requested all of the documents that would reveal the discussions among Attorney General Bill Barr, former deputy attorney general Rod Rosenstein, and other high-ranking officials about whether to charge President Donald Trump with obstruction.

    Justice Department lawyers said the volume of records at issue could total 18 billion pages and could take centuries to produce.

    At a hearing earlier this month, US District Court Judge Reggie Walton was not sympathetic. “It shouldn’t fall on the backs of the citizens to wait years to find out what the government is up to,” he said. If the Justice Department couldn’t handle the request in a more timely fashion, he added, it should ask Congress for money to hire more help.

    Today, in response to a court order, the Justice Department has released the first installment of documents: 500 pages of summaries of FBI interviews with witnesses, available here for the first time. Another installment will be released every month for at least the next eight years.

    Known as “302 reports,” these summaries of interviews — which have been conducted with people such as former White House counsel Don McGahn, former attorney general Jeff Sessions, and Trump’s former fixer and lawyer Michael Cohen — are some of the most important and highly sought-after documents from Mueller’s investigation. They reveal what key players in the campaign told FBI agents about Russia, Trump, his business dealings, and his attempts to impede the special counsel’s investigation.

    After years of speculation and accusation, these documents offer a chance for everyone to view a key function of American democracy. That opportunity — hard-won, but enshrined anew with each additional FOIA release — commences today. It will last long after all the players have departed….

    Link to the documents and some key takeaways atl. Props to these reporters.

  83. says

    Susan Hennessey:

    The combination of the 302s and the information contained in the report leaves very little question as to whether or not Trump, in fact, “directed” Cohen to submit false testimony. Mueller really strained to avoiding reaching that conclusion.

    The only way you can really defend it is by taking the view that Cohen was entirely unreliable without unambiguous, documentary corroboration. That isn’t crazy following a false statements plea, but it ignores the obvious conclusion.

    The 302s don’t really transform the record, it’s more the starkness of the presentation.

  84. says

    Kurdistan 24 – “Syrian Kurdish leader lambasts Trump for praising Turkish ceasefire deal”:

    A top Syrian Kurdish official has criticized US President Donald Trump on Saturday for praising a US-Turkish ceasefire agreement, suggesting that attacks by Turkish-backed groups in northern Syria continue.

    “Contrary to reality and the ongoing events in the region, especially in northern and eastern Syria, Mr. Donald Trump talks about the success of the agreement on a ceasefire in northern Syria following the Turkish state’s attacks on our people in their safe areas and villages,” said Aldar Xelil, the head of the Diplomatic Relations Office for the Movement for a Democratic Society (TEV-DEM), in a public statement.

    “The fact that this approach is in contradiction of reality and far from the ignored facts, is a denial of responsibility for what has been declared to protect the people of the region from the danger and annihilation of the Turkish state.”

    “Turkey’s mercenaries are still continuing their attacks on our areas, civilians are still their target, and the burning and looting of houses is still ongoing – they also strive to empty the area from their inhabitants and to accommodate the families of mercenaries there, which must be followed closely by the sponsors [of the agreement] to stop the hostilities,” Xelil said.

    “The ceasefire has become a cover for Erdogan to achieve further progress after the failure to achieve its full objectives through military operations, as well as a cover for the implicit agreement between Trump and Erdogan to distract those within the US opposed to this against this alliance and the agreement,” he concluded….

    Mustafa Bali:

    To displace true owners of the land and to settle Syrian refugees in Turkey to their homes in NE Syria, Turkish army and its proxies are now creating chaos in Til Abyad by explosions targeting civilians. Turkey is responsible for civilian casualties in the region it controls.

    This is the same tactic used by Turkey in occupied Afrin as well in an attempt to eradicate city’s Kurdish population. Civilians must be aware of this and nobody should leave their homes in the areas occupied by Turkey in NE Syria.

  85. says

    Trump’s golf resort, Doral, is a shithole.

    The Daily Mail visits @realdonaldtrump’s Doral resort, finds:
    –Views of 2 different garbage dumps.
    –Mold on an A/C vent in the lobby and “on nearly every chaise-lounge by the pools.”
    –Lingering fumes from jets on approach to MIA

    https://twitter.com/Fahrenthold/status/1190365183459438598

    […] Visitors need only to sit by the aquarium windows of the resort’s BLT Prime Restaurant to understand fully why it was ridiculous to even consider hosting an auspicious gathering like the G7 there.

    They can munch on a $106-porterhouse steak while enjoying the views of not just one but two county garbage dumps rising high above the golf course’s palm-tree line – and getting higher by the day.

    If French President Emmanuel Macron was digging into a $38-Dover sole at a different window, he’d be able to spot, just to the west, the smokestacks and silos from a garbage-burning plant towering over the 12th hole of the resort’s famed Blue Monster golf course.

    We checked out the Trump Spa, where guests can get a $300-massage with an anti-aging serum and organic oils that leaves ‘your skin feeling like silk,’ according to the resort’s brochure.

    Silky skin, however, doesn’t feel so silky if it touches the rim of the toilet in the men’s gold-and-marble bathroom caked in what appeared to be feces, which we witnessed on the afternoon when we visited.

    There’s the mold growing alongside a ceiling AC vent in the lobby and on nearly every chaise-lounge by the pools.

    There are black stains in the large aging carpets by the lobby bar.

    During our stay, we found other malfunctioning equipment and questionable sanitary conditions at a resort where the average room goes for about $350 a night, placing it out of bounds for most Trump voters. […]

    Daily Mail link

    This report does not surprise me. Trump runs Doral like he runs the USA … badly, incompetently, and with a huge amount of propaganda slathered on top.

  86. says

    Another threat from Turkish officials … well, actually this is repetition of a threat issued from Turkey before:

    Turkey will send captured Islamic State members back to their home countries, Turkey’s Interior Minister Süleyman Soylu said Saturday.

    Soylu lashed out at European governments for their refusal to take back nationals who joined the group. “That is not acceptable to us. It’s also irresponsible,” he said according to Reuters. “We will send the captured Daesh [ISIS] members to their countries.”

    EU governments have been at odds over whether to repatriate people who went to Syria and Iraq to fight with the Islamic State group. France has advocated bringing the fighters home to face justice. Germany has opted to leave its nationals in the hands of Kurdish fighters and has only repatriated some children and women.

    However, many fighters have escaped from Kurdish camps since Turkey launched a military incursion in Northern Syria and some have been re-captured by Turkish forces. […]

    Link

  87. says

    A proposed HHS rule would roll back LGBTQ protections relevant to adoption agencies, and in foster care.

    The Department of Health and Human Services proposed a new rule Friday that would allow recipients of federal grants from the health agency, including faith-based adoption agencies and foster care providers, to turn away same-sex couples.

    The rule would roll back an Obama-era regulation that went into effect days before he left office in 2017 that inserted nondiscrimination language on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity when determining the recipients of grants from the agency. […]

    civil rights groups quickly rebuked the move, which came on the first day of National Adoption Month, calling it an attack on the LGBTQ community.

    The proposed rule, which is still subject to a public comment period and will likely be challenged in court, strips out language specifically barring against discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity in favor of prohibiting discrimination to potential grant recipients “to the extent doing so is prohibited by federal statute” or Supreme Court rulings. […]

    Link

    More at the link.

  88. says

    Lynna @ #122, and the camps in Syria are rapidly becoming a humanitarian emergency. Conditions weren’t great to begin with, and now with the Turkish attack and the chaos, the ISIS prisoners are in bad shape. I’ve seen some pictures of men who look like they’re very sick or starving.

  89. says

    About Trump switching his official residency from New York to Florida:

    “I love New York, but New York can never be great again under the current leadership of Governor Andrew Cuomo (the brother of Fredo), or Mayor Bill DeBlasio,” Trump tweeted hours before his rally in Tupelo, Mississippi. “Cuomo has weaponized the prosecutors to do his dirty work (and to keep him out of jams), a reason some don’t want to be in New York, and another reason they are leaving.” […]

    Trump’s criticism, presented without evidence, comes after the New York lawmakers denounced his move to change his residence from New York to Florida.

    “Don’t let the door hit you on the way out or whatever,” de Blasio tweeted. “Good riddance. It’s not like @realDonaldTrump paid taxes here anyway…He’s all yours, Florida,” Cuomo wrote.

    Cuomo continued his attacks on the president Friday, calling it a “desperate legal move” to avoid the release of his tax returns.

    “The fight will continue, and I think it is a desperate legal move where he’s now going to argue ‘Well the state should have no right to my taxes because I moved out, I’m a Florida resident. That’s besides the point,” Cuomo said on MSNBC. “When you filed your taxes, you were a New York resident. If you defrauded the state, you defrauded it when you are a New York state resident.”

    […] a Manhattan district attorney subpoenaed eight years of his tax returns. […]

    Documents filed at the Palm Beach County Circuit Court showed both Trump and first lady Melania Trump declared the Florida Mar-A-Lago address to be their primary residence […]

    “He’s been treated very unfairly, but he speaks for many people — taxpayers — who have been treated unfairly in New York,” [Kellyanne] Conway said […]

    Trump Jr. also took to Twitter to attack Cuomo: “Nice soundbite. Now do the tens of thousands of other successful New Yorkers and businesses fleeing your idiotic policies every week,” Trump Jr. wrote. “I’ll wait.”

    Trump Jr. alleged that the governor “begged” his father for money ⁠— presumably referring to Trump’s previous campaign donations to Cuomo. In July 2018, Cuomo said he would keep campaign contributions from the president, but remain “deeply critical of him.”

    “Also I don’t remember this sentiment ever stopping you from coming to @realDonaldTrump’s office begging for $,” Trump Jr. wrote. “I was there. GOOD TIMES”

    Link

  90. says

    Followup to SC’s comment 103, and to Daniel Dale’s live blog of the rally in Mississippi.

    Trump was purportedly in Mississippi to support Tate Reeves, the Republican running for governor there, but instead, Trump blathered on an on about other subjects; defending himself against the House impeachment inquiry, and obviously that was Trump’s reason for the rally.

    […] In his first rally since the House of Representatives’ Thursday vote on the impeachment inquiry, the president did find some time to ask voters to support Reeves, who he brought onstage, but spent the majority of his address attacking lawmakers, the press, and political opponents to defend himself against growing scrutiny.

    A day before the rally, the House voted to endorse an impeachment inquiry into the president’s efforts to pressure Ukraine into opening an investigation against his political opponent, former Vice President Joe Biden, and Biden’s son, Hunter.

    As the House’s hearings with state officials are bringing potentially damaging information to light, Trump was eager to paint the investigation as a “hoax.” Proclaiming his innocence, he attacked Democratic leadership and threw a question back at the crowd: “How do you impeach a president who didn’t do anything wrong?”

    “The [Democratic Party] leadership, they have no clue,” Trump continued. “They’re just very vicious people — actually, they’re sort of mentally violent people. But we’ve got it under control. It always help when you didn’t do anything wrong.” […]

    After spending time attacking his usual foils, including former President Barack Obama, his former presidential rival Hillary Clinton (whose mention was greeted by chants of “Lock her up”), and Republican Sen. Mitt Romney (who has said he has some concerns about Trump and Ukraine), Trump told the crowd he doesn’t fear his critics or impeachment, because he believes he will come out on top.

    “They figured they could take us out a different way, very dishonestly: with the lying and the spying and the leaking,” Trump said. “And we are kicking their ass, I tell you.”

    Link

  91. says

    About Elizabeth Warren’s 60-page plan to pay for her “Medicare for All” proposal:

    […] As [Paul] Krugman points out, whatever the math, no plan to remake American healthcare more equitably is going to be ready to go, out of the box, even if Warren gets elected.

    The real crafting of a healthcare reform bill will happen between the president and, let’s hope, a new Democratic Congress. But Warren’s plan passes some basic tests for seriousness as a policy proposal, says Krugman. It was drafted with the help of a bunch of serious people like former Obama health policy honcho Don Berwick, who headed the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and Simon Johnson, former chief economist at the World Bank, plus several other real economists. Warren’s detailed overview is accompanied by a pair of detailed appendices analyzing the numbers and economic assumptions in further detail.

    Argue all you want over the numbers, says Krugman, but they’re there — and unlike every Republican plan of the last few decades, it doesn’t depend on waving a magic wand with an effigy of Ronald Reagan’s dick on the end and chanting “magic of the marketplace.” We may have embellished that a little.

    For a pretty good overview of the details, see this […] piece by Ezra Klein, who notes that the plan definitely relies on some optimistic but not imaginary scenarios in order to add up. The US currently pays far too much to deliver healthcare to far too many people. And since other countries manage to cover everyone, at a lower portion of GDP, then it should be possible to do the same here.

    Warren’s M4A team projects that a single-payer system would cost a tiny bit less over 10 years than our current patchwork of public and private care does. M4A would become a hell of a lot more efficient, since you’d be getting rid of the insurance companies making a profit off paying for healthcare, and there wouldn’t be a million different plans with a million different reimbursement rates. Plus, the government would regulate prices for nearly everything, as is the case in Europe and other countries with universal healthcare. Some costs would rise, since millions of people who are uninsured or under-insured now will start seeing doctors […]

    Wonkette link

  92. says

    302s FOIA: Manafort seeded lie on Ukraine DNC hack immediately, advised campaign after being fired, briefing Gates and Hannity, while Bannon helped conceal. Bannon warned of Wendy Deng and oligarchs as they vacationed with Javanka. And more. #MuellerMemos”

  93. says

    From Max Boot, writing for The Washington Post:

    In protesting the House resolution to proceed with impeachment proceedings, House Minority Whip Steve Scalise (R-La.) displayed a poster illustrated with a picture of St. Basil’s Cathedral in Moscow and a hammer and sickle. It was labeled: “37 Days of Soviet-style impeachment proceedings.”

    This will be compelling to those who are so ignorant of history that they think the Soviets bothered with hearings where a minority party could cross-examine witnesses and vociferously defend the accused. Spoiler alert: They didn’t have minority parties in the Soviet Union, and they didn’t have constitutional proceedings either. The Soviets’ preferred method of disposing of dissidents was a bullet to the back of the head or a train trip to the gulag. When they had trials at all, the proceedings were shams in which the defendant typically confessed to imaginary offenses after having been tortured or threatened with retaliation against his family.

    The irony is that if anyone is exhibiting a “Soviet-style” mind-set, it’s not the Democrats. It’s the party whose supreme leader claims he is a “stable genius,” that he knows more about every subject than any expert (e.g., “I know more about ISIS than the generals do”), and that in his “great and unmatched wisdom,” he can do no wrong. This is all too reminiscent of the way that Soviet propaganda deified Joseph Stalin as a “genius,” “our best collective farm worker,” “our shockworker,” the “beloved” and wise “Father of Nations.”

    Soviet apparatchiks once competed to sing the praises of the party leader. Now with polls showing that roughly half of the country favors the president’s impeachment and removal, retired Army colonel Douglas Macgregor proclaimed on Fox News: “Donald Trump plays chess in multiple dimensions simultaneously. He has now checkmated all of his potential opponents, his competitors.” Trump’s own press secretary swatted aside recent criticism from former chief of staff John F. Kelly, saying, “I worked with John Kelly, and he was totally unequipped to handle the genius of our great president.”

    At meetings of the Supreme Soviet, party leaders knew they had to show lockstep loyalty — or else. For some reason I was reminded of this when a reporter asked House Republican leaders: “Will you all go on record and say that the president did nothing inappropriate?” House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) immediately led fellow Republicans in a robotic chant of “yes” despite overwhelming evidence that the president used military aid to try to extort Ukraine into helping his reelection campaign. […]

  94. says

    CNN – “Facebook will allow UK election candidates to run false ads”:

    A controversial policy allowing politicians to run false ads on Facebook will extend to the United Kingdom as the country prepares to vote in a historic December election, Facebook confirmed to CNN Business.

    The policy is being championed by Facebook executive Nick Clegg, the former deputy prime minister of the United Kingdom who himself once complained about “lies” spread during the 2016 Brexit referendum.

    The company will not fact-check ads run by British political parties and the thousands of candidates running for election to the House of Commons. Ads from other political groups, like the pro-Brexit group Leave.EU, will be subjected to fact-checking, the company confirmed.

    Damian Collins, a Conservative member of Parliament who has been spearheading parliamentary hearings on Facebook, told CNN Business Friday: “People shouldn’t be able to spread disinformation during election campaigns just because they are paying Facebook to do so.”

    “You have to question whether Nick Clegg has made any positive difference at Facebook. He certainly hasn’t from our perspective,” Collins told CNN Business.

    The December 12 UK election will be one of the first times the controversial Facebook policy will be tested in a major contest in an English-speaking country, one that’s being described as among the most important in UK history.

    Though Facebook is getting the brunt of the criticism regarding the political ads, experts say outdated political campaign laws are also to blame.

    Though plenty of parliamentary committee time and ink has been spent investigating social media’s impact on elections and campaigns in the UK, the law has not changed, Rasmus Kleis Nielsen, head of the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism at Oxford University told CNN Business.

    “I think it’s important to recognize that Facebook has a lot to answer for and it’s important we look critically at what they do and what they enable,” he said. “But it’s also really, really important we recognize that British politicians have done nothing to change the rules of the game despite all the shortcomings we have documented on how those rules have worked in recent elections.”

  95. says

    Scott Stedman:

    Most insane revelation in the 302s: Bannon says Kushner WAS with Dmitry Rybolovlev in August 2016. There has been speculation about this for years.

    Backstory: Kushner and Rybolovlev’s jet and yacht both popped up in Croatia at the same time in August 2016. Glenn Simpson noted this in his testimony. Now, Bannon said they were indeed together.

    So according to Trump’s campaign manager, Kushner was having a secret meeting in Croatia in August 2016 with a Russian billionaire who previously bought Trump’s mansion for $50M over price, his girlfriend, and Putin’s reported fling.

    Also, there were reports in 2017 that Kushner was warned by intelligence people that Wendi Deng (Rupert Murdoch’s ex) might be a spy for China.

  96. says

    Carole Cadwalladr:

    So one of Bad Boys of Brexit turns up in Mississippi. At a Trump rally. It’s all strangely familiar. Remember ‘Mr Brexit’? When Trump intro-ed Farage to America & made explicit link to Brexit? That was Mississippi. In same period Wigmore, below, was in & out of Russian embassy.

    The link being this guy – the governor of Mississippi. So this is all pretty interesting. He brokered Farage-Trump before. And here is again just as Trump-Farage axis re-awakens in last few days.

    And here’s Phil Bryant again. At the swanky press launch in July this year Farage held for new outfit World4Brexit. @FT said he had ‘joined forces with Trump-supporting Americans to form lobbying body’. The mission? To raise money for Brexit.

    So many questions about this. Like, what’s Bannon’s involvement? And it’s all very well for Farage to say that all donations will be ‘above board & legal’. But foreign money [theoretically] banned from UK politics. So..wtf? Where’s the money going??? To whom? For what purpose?

    Here’s Rachel Maddow’s report on the Trump-Farage rally in Mississippi in August 2016. It still sticks with me.

  97. says

    Josh Dawsey:

    Trump berated aides in May who pushed for better Ukraine ties. He sought to block 2017 aid, complaining of country & saying it would offend Russia. He has questioned whether it’s a real country. W/@GregJaffe on loathing at heart of impeachment probe:…

    Trump told aides that “everyone” was opposed to helping Ukraine. But his national security team wanted to provide aid. Fueled by GIULIANI, he said the corrupt country tried to take him down. He wanted concessions. Efforts, loathing now heart of inquiry:…

    WaPo link atl.

  98. says

    Re #141 – I really hope the media don’t fall for attempts to make the Ukraine story about some irrational and inexplicable personal hostility Trump has for Ukraine (which would be disqualifying enough!), when all of his bizarre attitudes, beliefs, and grievances coincide with and benefit Putin and a handful of other corrupt autocrats.

  99. says

    Julia Davis:

    Trump peppered Volker with his negative views of Ukraine, suggesting that it wasn’t a “real country,” that it had always been a part of Russia, and that it was “totally corrupt.”

    [That is EXACTLY what Putin would want Trump to think and say.]

  100. says

    BBC – “UFC: Raucous reception for Trump at Mixed Martial Arts”:

    Donald Trump was met with raucous boos – and some cheers – on Saturday as he attended the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) in New York.

    The US president attended the Mixed Martial Arts (MMA) event with high-ranking Republicans and his sons, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump.

    A small anti-Trump protest was held at the Madison Square Garden arena.

    It comes less than a week after the president was booed at the baseball World Series [LOL – SC] in Washington DC.

    Signs reading “Remove Trump” and “Impeach Trump” were also spotted in the crowd.

    As video of the crowd spread on social media, his son Donald Jr hit back on Twitter, saying the reception had been “overwhelmingly positive” and that UFC President Dana White – a long-time friend of the president’s – had called it “the most electrifying entrance he’s seen in 25 years”….

  101. says

    Guardian – “Labour questions Dominic Cummings’s links to Russia”:

    The shadow foreign secretary, Emily Thornberry, has written to the government with questions about Dominic Cummings’s connections to Russia and the levels of security vetting to which he has been subjected in Downing Street after an official-level whistleblower raised serious concerns.

    Cummings, the divisive senior adviser to the prime minister, Boris Johnson, spent three years in Russia from 1994 to 1997 after he graduated from Oxford University with a first in ancient and modern history.

    In her letter addressed to the foreign secretary, Dominic Raab, which was first reported on in the Sunday Times and has been seen by the Guardian, Thornberry says shadow ministers have been approached with “serious concerns by an official-level whistleblower” but adds: “We make no claim to know the veracity of their claims.”

    She then asks what level of security vetting Cummings was subjected to prior to his appointment at No 10.

    The shadow foreign secretary asks a number of further questions in relation to Cummings’s relationship with Russia, on the assumption that he has been subjected to the highest level of developed vetting. She asks:

    -Was Cummings questioned about relationships with members of the group Conservative Friends of Russia?

    The letter is copied to Sir Mark Sedwill, head of the civil service, as well as the heads of MI5 and MI6 and the chair of the intelligence and security committee (ISC), Dominic Grieve.

    Grieve this week accused the prime minister of sitting on an ISC report on Russian interference in British politics, including the 2016 EU referendum. The ISC said it had expected Johnson to approve publication of the 50-page dossier by Thursday – and there was now a risk its publication would be prevented before the general election.

    It is understood that the dossier examines allegations that Russian money has flowed into British politics in general and the Conservative party in particular. It also features claims that Russia launched a major influence operation in 2016 in support of Brexit.

    Cummings was the campaign director and co-founder of Vote Leave, the official campaign in support of leaving the EU, which was found to have broken the law by exceeding a £7m spending limit. Vote Leave was fined and referred to the police, who earlier this week handed a file to prosecutors for consideration.

  102. says

    SBS – “The German city of Dresden has been forced to declare a ‘Nazi emergency'”:

    The eastern German city of Dresden has declared a “Nazi emergency” as officials warned of a rise in far-right support and violence.

    The city is the birthplace of the Islamophobic Pegida movement, which holds weekly rallies here, while the anti-immigration Alternative fuer Deutschland (AfD) party won 28 per cent in September regional elections.

    Dresden’s city council has now backed a resolution against far-right extremism with the title “Nazinotstand?”, or “Nazi emergency?”.

    It was brought by Max Aschenbach, a local councillor for left-leaning satirical party Die Partei, who told the DPA news agency that “this city has a Nazi problem”.

    The resolution said the city was “worried that anti-democratic, anti-pluralist, discriminatory and far-right positions which include violence” were on the rise in Dresden.

    It called for a “strengthening of democratic culture”, making a priority of “the protection of minorities, human rights and victims of extreme-right violence”.

    The motion also stressed the importance to fight “anti-Semitism, racism and Islamophobia”.

    The resolution was approved by 39 council member votes against 29.

    It was backed by the left and liberal parties but rejected not only by the AfD members but also by centre-right Christian Democrats who said it should not have targeted right-wing extremism only….

  103. says

    Guardian Observer – “Johnson ‘knew about Vote Leave’s illegal overspend’, says MP”:

    Boris Johnson knew of Vote Leave’s overspend during the 2016 EU referendum, but appears to have failed to tell the authorities, according to explosive new claims from a senior MP. The payment was subsequently ruled to be illegal.

    Ian Lucas revealed that he has seen correspondence obtained during the parliamentary inquiry into disinformation and democracy which showed that Johnson’s most senior aide, Dominic Cummings, told the Electoral Commission that the prime minister, and his cabinet colleague Michael Gove, knew of the overspend by the pro-Brexit organisation.

    The Electoral Commission last year judged that Vote Leave had broken electoral law by overspending during the EU referendum, after the campaign funnelled £675,000 through another pro-Brexit group, BeLeave, to avoid spending limits.

    The revelation comes as it was confirmed that prosecutors have received a file of evidence from the Metropolitan Police that could lead to criminal charges against the Vote Leave campaign, which was spearheaded by Johnson and Cummings.

    Veteran Labour MP Lucas, who sat on the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) Committee inquiry into fake news, said the correspondence showing that the prime minister had apparently failed to report an offence raised serious questions over Johnson’s judgement.

    Lucas told the Observer: “Johnson and Gove both knew about the illegal payments to BeLeave. I’ve seen it in writing. We finally forced the Electoral Commission to hand over its correspondence with Dominic Cummings; it’s there in black and white. It’s Cummings himself saying this.”

    The Wrexham MP also revealed that the disclosure by Cummings was part of a strategy to protect the prime minister and Gove, with Johnson’s chief adviser insisting that both politicians only discovered the overspend after the EU referendum vote, though it’s unknown when exactly it is believed to be.

    “The astonishing thing is, he actually said this in the context of defending them. He said they didn’t know at the time, they only knew after the referendum. That means he’s been sitting on this information the entire time,” said Lucas.

    “What’s quite clear is Cummings, Johnson and Gove are absolutely in this up to their necks. They must now come clean about everything they knew about these offences. Boris Johnson is simply not fit to be prime minister. He clearly has no respect for the law,” Lucas said.

    The development arrives at a particularly delicate period for Johnson and Cummings with fresh pressure on Downing Street yesterday to release a potentially incendiary report into the extent of Russian interference in British politics….

  104. says

    Whistleblower attorney Mark Zaid:

    WBer NEWS ALERT:

    Our legal team offered GOP direct opportunity to ask written questions of #whistleblower.

    Recent GOP messaging, led by President Trump (incl this morning), has been to highlight original #WBer & demand disclosure of identity.

    Despite long standing policy of HPSCI to protect #whistleblowers, especially anonymity (btw, this was consistent with my efforts w/GOP on #Benghazi), GOP has sought to expose our client’s identity which could jeopardize their safety, as well as that of their family.

    We have directly engaged GOP as to the irrelevance of the whistleblower’s information and identity (including addressing any issue of bias), but with little effect in halting the attacks. Btw, countless OIG complaints are filed anonymously & full of hearsay. It’s common.

    We offered HPSCI (& SSCI), both Majority & Minority, to have #whistleblower answer questions in writing, under oath & penalty of perjury. Obviously, per House rules GOP is beholden to DEMs.

    We, however, are not.

    Being a whistleblower is not a partisan job nor is impeachment an objective. That is not our role.

    So we have offered to @DevinNunes, Ranking HPSCI Member, opportunity for Minority to submit through legal team written questions to WBer. Qs cannot seek identifying info, regarding which we will not provide, or otherwise be inappropriate. We will ensure timely answers.

    We stand ready to cooperate and ensure facts – rather than partisanship – dictates any process involving the #whistleblower.

  105. says

    Brett McGurk:

    I spent a lot of time with US Special Forces on the ground in Syria where they had a clear mission over two administrations to defeat ISIS. These images of US forces now in Syria with an ill-defined mission to guard small oil fields make me cringe.

    As @barbarastarrcnn reports, Trump is deploying mechanized units without a clear mission and with essential rules of engagement undefined as US forces have already abandoned 2/3 of NE Syria and left the SDF largely to the mercy of Putin and Erdogan.

  106. says

    Adam Schiff:

    The president continues to target public servants, including those who have served their country in combat, with baseless attacks.

    Efforts to intimidate or threaten witnesses will further build the case for obstruction, itself an impeachable offense.

  107. tomh says

    WaPo:
    Mulvaney allies try to stonewall Democrats’ impeachment inquiry
    Budget chief and other top aides will attempt to create firewall after other senior officials gave testimony that questioned Trump’s motivations
    By Rachael Bade, Josh Dawsey and Erica Werner
    November 3, 2019 at 1:44 p.m. PST

    One of acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney’s top allies is preparing to deliver what President Trump wants but has failed to achieve so far in the impeachment inquiry: unquestioning loyalty from administration staff.

    Russell Vought, a Mulvaney protege who leads the White House Office of Management and Budget, intends a concerted defiance of congressional subpoenas in coming days, and two of his subordinates will follow suit — simultaneously proving their loyalty to the president and a creating a potentially critical firewall regarding the alleged use of foreign aid to elicit political favors from a U.S. ally.

    The OMB is at the nexus of the impeachment inquiry because Democrats are pressing for details about why the White House budget office effectively froze the Ukraine funds that Congress had already appropriated.

    Congressional Republicans are also predicting that Mulvaney’s deputy, Robert Blair, will refuse to show for his scheduled Monday appearance before impeachment investigators — though a White House spokesman and Blair’s attorney, Whit Ellerman, did not respond to questions about his plans. Blair was on the July 25 phone call when Trump asked Ukraine’s president for a “favor” investigating former vice president Joe Biden, a 2020 presidential contender.

    The anticipated defiance toward impeachment investigators comes as Trump has grown enraged that so many of “his employees,” as he refers to them, are going to Capitol Hill and testifying, said a person who regularly talks with him and who spoke on the condition of anonymity. The president has asked for copies of witness statements so he can decide how to criticize them, complained that his lawyers are not doing enough to stop people from talking, and even encouraged members of Congress to question the credibility of people working in his own administration, current and former officials said.

    Vought, who serves in an acting capacity in the job Mulvaney once held, has sought to build a relationship with the president for some time and sees standing firm against the impeachment inquiry as a way to bolster it, according to two White House officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity. Like Trump, the longtime conservative warrior has derided the impeachment inquiry as a “sham process” and has said he will not comply with the subpoena to appear for a deposition this coming Wednesday. Vought shares the president’s disdain of foreign aid and has sought to cut it in previous budgets.

    Trump has at times questioned the loyalty of Mulvaney’s aides, but OMB officials have assured the president they will not show up and help the Democrats’ probe, two officials said, pleasing the president.

    Vought’s move to stonewall Congress follows a string of National Security Council and State Department witnesses testifying that the president tried to withhold nearly $400 million in security aid for Ukraine unless that country would launch politically charged investigations that could benefit Trump. Vought, Blair and the other two OMB officials called to testify could shed more light on those decisions and the process.

    Although OMB officials were not the ones calling the shots about how to handle the military aid, it was their responsibility to implement those decisions and to release the aid — or hold it up — as directed. Their testimony could fill in important details about the decision-making process around the money.

    “We know from the president that he wanted the Ukrainians to do these investigations, and we know that aid was being withheld when he was asking the Ukrainians,” said Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.), an impeachment investigator. “You still have to connect all the dots. … They’re dot-connecting witnesses.”

    Vought was immediately told of the president’s decision to scuttle the aid and agreed with some other top advisers that it was legal, two administration officials said. Michael Duffey, one of Vought’s subordinates who has also been called to testify on Tuesday and who controls foreign aid decisions in the OMB, signed the OMB document freezing the Ukraine aid, according to the administration officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. Duffey is OMB’s associate director for national security programs.

    An agency spokeswoman said its officials are simply abiding by the White House’s directive, which is that the impeachment inquiry is illegitimate and the administration is not cooperating.

    “The idea that OMB’s posture is informed by anything other than respecting the prerogatives of the president is absurd,” said OMB spokeswoman Rachel Semmel.

    Trump suggested on Sunday he could continue exerting his prerogative over OMB when he told a reporter that he wouldn’t rule out directing another government shutdown later this month if negotiations with Democrats don’t lead to the results he wants.

    The expected defiance from Mulvaney’s allies could bolster the standing of the acting chief, whose job has been a constant source of speculation. In an interview with the Washington Examiner last week, Trump seemed to sympathize with Senate Republicans’ annoyance at Mulvaney and refused to weigh in on whether he was “happy” with Mulvaney’s performance. He continues to complain about him, advisers say, but is unlikely to immediately replace him at this time.

    […]

    The decision to ignore a congressional subpoena comes with risk. House Democrats could hold Vought and his aides in contempt of Congress or take them to court to try to compel their testimony, as the party has done for former White House counsel Donald McGahn. Democrats have said they will not wait on the courts before they proceed with their impeachment inquiry. But by suing Trump officials, they could force testimony next year, shortly before the presidential election.
    […]

  108. johnson catman says

    re SC @157: So, he stood on the WH lawn with the helicopter whirring for twenty fucking minutes disparaging Vindman? The fucking republicans are totally shameful to support this asshole.

  109. johnson catman says

    re SC @158: How damn delusional do you have to be to think that boos are cheers? I just want every one of that damn family to disappear from the face of the earth.

  110. KG says

    SC@147,

    A correction (of Carole Cadwalladr): Grieve is an ex-Tory MP, one of those expelled by Johnson for backing the “Benn Bill” which obliged Johnson to ask for an extension. Some of the comments on the Twitter thread make the same point.

  111. says

    Angry White Men blog – “‘My Ancestors Fucking Enslaved Those Pieces Of Fucking Shit,’ Richard Spencer Shrieks In Leaked Audio”:

    In another peek into how white nationalists speak behind closed doors, a newly leaked recording from the aftermath of 2017’s “Unite the Right” rally depicts alt-right figurehead Richard Spencer railing against Jews and non-whites. The audio was posted today to the YouTube and Telegram channels of Milo Yiannopoulos, himself a misogynistic and Islamophobic troll.

    As the face of the so-called alt-right movement — a loose collection of tech-savvy white nationalists, Neo-Nazis, identitarians, antisemites, and fascists — Spencer was measured in his tone and preferred to dress in three-piece suits. He was referred to as a “dapper white nationalist” by Mother Jones in 2016 and as recently as July made an appearance on CNN.

    But the leaked audio, nearly a minute in length, presents a very different side of the well-coiffed racist….

    Audio atl. I don’t know how something like this could be authenticated.

    Also:

    This is what the “alt-right” always was—rage and hate. Still to this day I am appalled and horrified that our country’s mass media treated it with kid gloves for as long as it did. I hope those newsrooms pause and reflect on this, but I’ll just say that I’m not holding my breath.

    This came out after Spencer criticized another white nationalist who folks like Milo want to sanitize into their circles. Info is info, and this time it seems relevant, but the fact Milo pushed this out is not a sign that there’s been a change of his affiliation, imo.

    As the AWM post notes, the other recent context is Yiannopoulos whining about how he and some other despicable people are banned from Twitter while Spencer is still allowed on the platform.

  112. KG says

    Remarkably, Sinn Fein is not running candidates in three Northern Ireland seats in order to give another candidate a better chance of defeating the “D”UP. In two cases the “D”UP currently hold the seat (in one of these their main challenger is from the “moderate nationalist” SDLP, in the other from the Alliance, which refuses to register as either nationalist or unionist. The third seat is the most remarkable: it is held by Sylvia Hermon, a pro-remain independent unionist. The SDLP will not run a candidate in South Belfast, to give Sinn Fein the best chance of beating Nigel Dodds, the “D”UP’s Westminster leader. The UUP (“moderate unionists”) have gone back on their promise to run in all 18 constituencies – they will not run in south Belfast, after protests from other unionists, and threats from paramilitaries.

    It seems inconsistent for Sinn Fein to stand aside for other candidates who will take their seats if elected while maintaining their own boycott of Westminster I wonder if they are reconsidering the latter.

  113. tomh says

    NYT:
    Trump Taxes: Appeals Court Rules President Must Turn Over 8 Years of Tax Returns
    By Benjamin Weiser
    Nov. 4, 2019, 10:47 a.m. ET

    A federal appeals panel on Monday said President Trump’s accounting firm must turn over eight years of his personal and corporate tax returns to Manhattan prosecutors, a setback for the president’s attempt to keep his financial records private.

    But the tax returns are not likely to be handed over soon. Mr. Trump has fought vigorously to shield his tax returns, and the case appears headed to the United States Supreme Court.

    Mr. Trump had sought to block his accounting firm from releasing the tax returns to the Manhattan district attorney’s office. Prosecutors in the office are investigating the role of the president and his business in hush-money payments made to two women just before the 2016 presidential election.

    The legal fight began in late August after the office of Mr. Vance, a Democrat, subpoenaed Mr. Trump’s accounting firm, Mazars USA, for his tax returns and those of his family business dating to 2011.

    The office sought the records in connection with an investigation into whether any New York State laws were broken when Mr. Trump and his company, the Trump Organization, reimbursed the president’s former lawyer and fixer, Michael D. Cohen, for payments he made to the adult film actress Stormy Daniels, who claimed she had an affair with Mr. Trump. Mr. Cohen was also involved in money paid to Karen McDougal, a Playboy model who also said she had a relationship with Mr. Trump. The president has denied the relationships.

    Trump counting on “his” Supreme Court.

  114. says

    While California is fighting massive fires, Trump is threatening to pull federal aid for the state:

    […] Trump offered a vague threat to pull California’s federal aid for combating dangerous wildfires on Sunday, sparking a response from Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom as the pair traded barbs through the day.

    “The Governor of California, @GavinNewsom, has done a terrible job of forest management,” Trump tweeted early Sunday. “I told him from the first day we met that he must ‘clean’ his forest floors regardless of what his bosses, the environmentalists, DEMAND of him. Must also do burns and cut fire stoppers. Every year, as the fire’s rage & California burns, it is the same thing-and then he comes to the Federal Government for $$$ help. No more. Get your act together Governor. You don’t see close to the level of burn in other states.”

    It’s unclear what fires Trump was referred to as the blazes that have ravaged California in recent weeks did not burn down any forests.

    Newsom on Sunday fired back, pointing to Trump’s years-long denial of climate change and its environmental effects.

    “You don’t believe in climate change,” Newsom tweeted. “You are excused from this conversation.” […]

    NBC News link

    Commentary:

    […] During a brief Q&A yesterday afternoon, Trump kept the offensive going, telling reporters, in reference to California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D), “The governor doesn’t know — he’s like a child. He doesn’t know what he’s doing.”

    I realize projection is a go-to move for the president, but I didn’t really expect him to bring his “no puppet” tactics to wildfire responses.

    To the extent that reality has any meaning, Trump’s rhetoric didn’t make any sense. California’s latest wildfires, for example, haven’t burnt down forests. The president’s claims about water distribution were similarly wrong. Even the assertion about the Golden State getting “no more” federal aid is probably not to be taken seriously.

    What I find important, however, is the bigger picture: Trump’s hostility toward the nation’s largest state has reached a ridiculous level. […]

    Link

    From the New York Times (in September):

    […] In recent months, the administration’s broader weakening of nationwide auto-emissions standards has become plagued with delays as staff members struggled to prepare legal, technical or scientific justifications for it. As a result, the White House decided to proceed with just one piece of its plan – the move to strip California of its authority to set tougher standards – while delaying its wider strategy, according to these people. […]

    Mr. Trump … according to two people familiar with the matter, wanted to press forward with a policy that would punish California. […]

  115. says

    Iran spins more centrifuges, making Trump’s failure more obvious.

    […] NBC News reported this morning on the latest evidence that Iran has become more dangerous, not less, in the wake of the American president walking away from the international nuclear agreement with our longtime adversary. In this case, Iran announced that Tehran, ignoring the terms of the JCPOA agreement that Trump blew up, is now “operating double the amount of advanced centrifuges than was previously known.”

    The decision to operate 60 IR-6 advanced centrifuges means that the country can produce enriched uranium 10 times as fast as the first-generation IR-1s allowed under the accord.

    The nuclear deal limited Iran to using only 5,060 first-generation IR-1 centrifuges to enrich uranium by rapidly spinning uranium hexafluoride gas. Salehi also said Tehran was working on a prototype centrifuge that’s 50 times faster than those allowed under the deal.

    By starting up these advanced centrifuges, Iran further cuts into the one-year time limit that experts estimate Tehran would need to have enough material to build a nuclear weapon, if it chose to pursue one.

    […] Trump took a policy that was working as intended and abandoned it for reasons he struggled to explain. Iran responded, as expected, by accelerating the nuclear program that the JCPOA policy had kept in check.

    As Colin Kahl, an Obama administration veteran, recently explained, ”Trump’s ‘maximum pressure’ campaign was supposed to induce Iran to scrap its nuclear program (which was already contained by the 2015 nuclear deal). Instead, Trump’s actions have incentivized Iran to restart it, creating a completely unnecessary crisis.” […]

    Link

  116. says

    WTF?

    President Trump suggested Sunday that Republicans should release their own versions of transcripts of interviews in the House’s ongoing impeachment inquiry. […]

    Link

  117. says

    About Trump’s “impenetrable” wall on the US/Mexico border:

    Smuggling gangs in Mexico have repeatedly sawed through new sections of President Trump’s border wall in recent months by using commercially available power tools, opening gaps large enough for people and drug loads to pass through, according to U.S. agents and officials with knowledge of the damage.

    The breaches have been made using a popular cordless household tool known as a reciprocating saw that retails at hardware stores for as little as $100 […]

    After cutting through the base of a single bollard, smugglers can push the steel out of the way, allowing an adult to fit through the gap. Because the bollards are so tall — and are attached only to a panel at the very top — their length makes them easier to push aside once they have been cut and are left dangling, according to engineers consulted by The Washington Post. […]

    Trump has increasingly boasted to crowds in recent weeks about the superlative properties of the barrier, calling it “virtually impenetrable” and likening the structure to a “Rolls-Royce” that border crossers cannot get over, under or through.

    The smuggling crews have been using other techniques, such as building makeshift ladders to scale the barriers, especially in the popular smuggling areas in the San Diego area, according to nearly a dozen U.S. agents and current and former administration officials.

    Washington Post link

  118. says

    REPORT: Kushner OK’d Khashoggi Arrest, Turkey Heard Call & Blackmailed Trump over Syrian Troops

    I saw this story pop up around midnight that, if verified by other sources – including the new whistleblowers they’re reporting on – would explain Trump’s sudden withdrawal of U.S. forces in Syria and puts a target squarely on Jared Kushner’s back for providing the opening to Washington Post reporter Jamal Khashoggi’s murder at the Saudi embassy in Istanbul in October of last year.

    It would also expose a U.S. president as having been blackmailed by another head of state into abandoning our Syrian Kurdish allies to protect his son-in-law.

    The UK’s Daily Mail released this story at midnight based on an article that was published late last night in the Spectator, […]

    I hope it isn’t true.

    And I say that because I hate the thought that a U.S. president’s closest advisor, a U.S. citizen and WH employee, gave the green light to a WP reporter’s (Khashoggi’s) arrest, especially if it led to Khashoggi’s brutal murder.

    Khashoggi was a legal resident of the U.S., educated at Indiana University, with children who are U.S. citizens, and was seeking to become a U.S. citizen himself when he was murdered.

    If it is true, I hope Kushner spends the rest of his days in SuperMax at Florence, CO pondering the death and misery he caused because of arrogance and hubris.

    Jared Kushner gave permission to Saudi ruler Mohammad bin Salman to arrest Jamal Khashoggi before he was killed and dismembered, a whistleblower claims.

    However, Turkish intelligence intercepted the call and President Recep Erdogan then used the information to force President Trump to remove his troops from northern Syria, according to the Spectator.

    You may recall that Washington Post reporter, Jamal Khashoggi, a staunch human rights activist and once friend-turned critic of the ruling Saudi royal family, was killed and dismembered inside the Saudi embassy in Istanbul, Turkey in October 2018.

    The Central Intelligence Agency and other Western governments believe that Saudi Crown Prince and friend of Jared Kushner, Mohammed bin Salman (MBS), ordered Khashoggi’s killing.

    The report also mentions that there are 4 NEW whistleblowers, including a new WB who reported Kushner’s phone call:

    Link

    More at the link.

  119. says

    From Wonkette:

    Donald Trump doesn’t drink, but he sure does all he can to sound exactly like the loudmouth at the local bar who has an expert opinion on every single thing that flashes on the TV screen. Which is why he knows exactly why so many wildfires broke out in California this fall. Has nothing to do with global warming, which is fake, or with too much development in fire-prone areas, because developers are the greatest people in America. And it certainly can’t be shitty management or delayed maintenance of the electrical grid, because utilities are businesses and all they need is less regulation.

    So really, it should be no surprise to anyone that Sunday, Trump’s first mention of the huge wildfires in California complained California has failed to properly manage its forests, when the fires haven’t actually been in forests. Because Donald Trump is the smartest man around, and all you need to do to prevent fires is rake the forests and stop the rivers from flowing into the sea, where they’re totally wasted, duh. […]

    After all, he’s told California what it needs to do again and again, and the mere fact that he’s been wrong every time is no excuse for California to keep ignoring his wise advice.

    The Los Angeles Times, to its credit, helpfully reviews the major California fires, not one of which would be stopped by clearing firebreaks, damming rivers, raking forests, or asking a porn star to spank a game show host and then paying her hush money.

    Trump’s comments contrast with the types of blazes firefighters battled last week:

    • The most destructive fire broke out in the heart of Los Angeles’ Westside, starting just off the 405 Freeway near the Getty Center and burning 12 homes in Brentwood.
    • The Easy fire, which threatened the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library, occurred in a suburban area dotted by subdivisions and open spaces in Ventura County.
    • The Maria fire burned on a mountain amid citrus and avocado groves between Santa Paula and Somis.
    • The 46 fire occurred in a riverbed in Riverside County, the result of a car crash at the end of a high-speed police pursuit. The fire leaped from the riverbed to a nearby shipping container manufacturer.
    • The Hillside fire did begin at the edge of the San Bernardino National Forest. But it quickly burned downhill into a San Bernardino neighborhood, which is where the fire fight occurred. It ended up burning just 200 acres but destroyed several homes.

    […]

    From the Washington Post:

    While fire prevention generally includes some level of debris management, scientists and fire-prevention experts agree California’s wildfire situation largely stems from the region’s intensifying heat that dries out vegetation and creates tinderbox conditions come fire season — which coincides with the prime time for powerful offshore winds like the Santa Ana and El Diablo that spread the easily-fueled fire.

    More from Wonkette:

    […] And of course, when you are talking forests and fire prevention, most of California’s actual forests, which don’t happen to be burning at the moment, are on federal land and managed by the federal government, not the state.

    Jesse Melger, a spokesperson for Newsom, also pointed out yesterday that while California has indeed been making debris management a priority, the feds have actually “slashed funding” to pay for fire prevention. […]

  120. says

    Newly released New York Times/Siena College surveys show Donald Trump in competitive positions in six key 2020 battleground states, with Elizabeth Warren trailing in all but one of the six, Bernie Sanders trailing in three, and Joe Biden trailing in one.

    NY times link

    Signs that the president’s advantage in the Electoral College has persisted or even increased since 2016. […]

    In national polls, Mr. Trump’s political standing has appeared to be in grave jeopardy. His approval ratings have long been in the low 40s, and he trails Mr. Biden by almost nine points in a national polling average. But as the 2016 race showed, the story in the battleground states can be quite different. Mr. Trump won the election by sweeping Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Florida, Arizona and North Carolina — even while losing the national vote by two points. […]

    The article is more dismissive of Elizabeth Warren than it should be, in my opinion.

  121. says

    WTF? The Republican Party of Minnesota has completed its presidential primary ballot, and GOP officials have decided to exclude Donald Trump’s primary rivals, leaving the president’s name as the only one listed.
    Minneapolis Star Tribune link

    […] Trump will be the only choice on the ballot in Minnesota’s Republican presidential primary, even though he’s not the only candidate.

    The state Republican Party has decided voters won’t have any alternatives.

    Its chairwoman, Jennifer Carnahan, sent a letter to the Minnesota Secretary of State on Oct. 24 outlining the party’s “determination of candidates” for the March 3 Republican primary ballot. Trump is the only name listed.

    Absent are three other Republicans who, while long shots, are prominent political names running active campaigns: former Massachusetts Gov. William Weld, former South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford and former U.S. Rep. Joe Walsh of Illinois.

    “The idea that we’re taking our cues from North Korea or the Soviet Union in terms of voter access and voter participation just seems weird to me,” Sanford said in an interview Thursday. […]

  122. says

    A loss for Trump, a win for some immigrants:

    The Trump administration has extended Temporary Protected Status for hundreds of thousands of immigrants from half a dozen countries through early 2021, as part of court action that blocked the administration from ending protections that have allowed some families to legally live and work in the U.S. for as long as two decades now.

    Administrations from both parties renewed TPS—which has been extended to immigrants who can’t return to their home countries due to natural disaster, for example—without controversy in the past, but Donald Trump’s administration, led by White House aide Stephen Miller, made it a priority for attack, and it’s clear why: during a White House meeting last year, the white supremacist-in-chief infamously attacked TPS families as coming from “shithole countries.”

    That remark later came back to bite Trump in the ass, when it was prominently cited in court action temporarily blocking the administration’s move. Now as litigation continues to play out in court, the administration has announced that protections for families from El Salvador, Haiti, Nicaragua, Honduras, Nepal, and Sudan will be extended through January of 2021. Families and their advocates are celebrating this important victory they themselves led. […]

    The humane and common sense answers, of course, are permanent protections, and legislation addressing that, along with permanent protections for Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals recipients and Deferred Enforced Departure holders, has already passed the Democratically led House. But the Dream and Promise Act, which would put TPS and DACA recipients onto a path to citizenship, has been left to languish in Mitch McConnell’s legislative graveyard, making him complicit in Trump’s white supremacist agenda.

    So in the face of this obstruction, it is the courts that are providing much needed—and lifesaving—relief to hundreds of thousands of these families. […]

    Link

  123. says

    https://www.wonkette.com/rudys-fixers-keep-breaking-sh-t

    In the fall of 2018, Chucklefucker Lev Parnas was so broke that he had to borrow money to pay for the herring and schnapps at his son’s bris. The following summer, he was swimming in cash, enjoying charter flights, luxury cars, and personal bodyguards. What changed? According to CNN, Ukrainian oligarch Dmitry Firtash waved the magic money wand and started raining cash down on his American fixer.

    “I’m the best-paid interpreter in the world,” Parnas joked, according to CNN’s sources. Firtash’s disheveled hairball lawyers Victoria Toensing and Joe diGenova back this up, minus the wink-wink, nudge-nudge, insisting that it was they who hired the jet-setting former stockbroker and aspiring natural gas magnate as a “translator” for their dealings with Firtash.

    “That’s a crock,” Toensing snapped, when NBC suggested that Firtash was paying Parnas directly. Later her firm issued a more sober statement, saying “Mr. Firtash met Mr. Parnas for the first time in June 2019. Mr. Firtash had no business relationship with Mr. Parnas or Mr. Fruman. Mr. Parnas was retained as a translator by the law firm of diGenova & Toensing. No money has been paid to Mr. Parnas by Mr. Firtash beyond his work as a translator for the law firm.”

    We have questions!

    First of all, CNN reports that Parnas is the one who connected the hairballs with the oligarch. So if you buy that Parnas was a “translator,” you have to swallow the additional story that, upon meeting Parnas for the first time, the billionaire immediately turned around, fired his famous American attorney Lanny Davis, and, on his new friend’s suggestion, hired replacement lawyers who just happen to be connected to the president’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani. Oh, and then those new lawyers hired Firtash’s friend to be their translator. And no one’s jaw is big enough to eat that bullshit sandwich.

    Second, Parnas, who couldn’t afford to toast his boychik’s perfect shmeckel in October, was paying off the $100,000 bris loan in August. After several trips to Vienna over the summer, he settled up his $30,000 debt to a charter flight company and ramped up his private flying. You know who’s been holed up in Vienna for five years trying to get the US government not to extradite him on bribery charges? DMITRY FIRTASH, that’s who. And, lest we forget, Parnas and his crony Igor Fruman were arrested at the airport with one-way tickets to Vienna in October.

    Third of all, Parnas and his crony Igor Fruman just got indicted for funneling $325,000 through their company Global Energy Producers to the pro-Trump America First Action PAC. And the reason the government knew that this was a fraudulent campaign contribution that didn’t come from GEP’s business was that the company didn’t make any money. So if GEP was paying to charter airplanes, it wasn’t with business income.

    According to CNN, “Parnas told some associates that Firtash was funding the flights.” In fact, Firtash was paying for all of it. […]

  124. says

    Commentary on Yovanovitch’s testimony:

    The former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine described to House impeachment investigators a diplomatic corps under siege by President Donald Trump and his personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, saying she felt threatened by Trump’s posture toward her, according to a transcript of her testimony released Monday.

    Marie Yovanovitch said individuals whose goals and interests were not in line with those of the United States — and were instead motivated by politics — tried to smear her and orchestrated her removal as ambassador to Kyiv. Yovanovitch said she felt personally threatened by Trump’s suggestion to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky during a July 25 phone call that she was “going to go through some things.”

    “I was shocked. I mean, I was very surprised that President Trump would — first of all, that I would feature repeatedly in a presidential phone call, but secondly, that the president would speak about me or any ambassador in that way to a foreign counterpart,” Yovanovitch, who was recalled as U.S. ambassador to Ukraine in May, told investigators.

    Yovanovitch said she did not know what Trump meant, adding: “I was very concerned. I still am.”

    She said she told Deputy Secretary of State John Sullivan that it was a “dangerous precedent” that “private interests and people who don’t like a particular American ambassador could combine to, you know, find somebody who was more suitable for their interests.”

    Another key witness in the House’s impeachment inquiry, former senior State Department adviser Michael McKinley, described sagging morale at the department as Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and other top officials refused to defend Yovanovitch from the politically motivated attacks.

    Transcripts of Yovanovitch’s and McKinley’s interviews with impeachment investigators were released Monday, the first such documents made public by lawmakers leading the probe, which centers on Trump’s efforts to pressure Zelensky to investigate his political opponents. […]

    “I was disturbed by the implication that foreign governments were being approached to procure negative information on political opponents,” McKinley, who resigned in part because the State Department wouldn’t issue a statement of support for Yovanovitch, told investigators. […]

    Link

  125. says

    Excerpt from a much longer article by Anders Aslund:

    […] Trump, Giuliani and co. are seizing repeatedly on Zelensky’s denial of feeling pressure to make the case that there can be no quid pro quo unless Zelensky attests to it. Trump tweeted on Sept. 26, for example, “The President of Ukraine said that he was NOT pressured by me to do anything wrong. Can’t have better testimony than that!” After Taylor’s testimony, Sen. Lindsey Graham said on Fox News, “Here’s the question: Why does the president of Ukraine deny there’s a quid pro quo?” Giuliani on Oct. 29 tweeted, “the only opinion that legally counts is Pres. Zelensky’s. Who has clearly said NO pressure. End of impeachment.”

    But Zelensky’s response is utterly logical—and acceptable—at home. Ukrainians are humble people. They know that they are receiving foreign assistance and that they had better be grateful for it. I did not hear any Ukrainian in Kyiv criticizing their president for being subservient to Trump. Why should he do anything else if he wants U.S. support, they would argue? Being in a war with Russia since 2014, Ukraine needs all the support it can get. Therefore, it must not criticize a major donor.

    This does not mean that Ukrainians thought Zelensky told the truth, but sometimes a president has to do what a president has to do. Needless to say, it means nothing that Zelensky claimed publicly that there was no quid pro quo on the part of Trump. It only means that it would be unwise for the Ukrainian president to criticize the U.S. president.

    Link

  126. tomh says

    WaPo:
    McKinley said he pushed three times for a statement supporting Yovanovitch, contrary to Pompeo’s claim to ABC News

    McKinley testified that he asked Pompeo on three separate occasions to issue a public statement of support for Yovanovitch. But in an interview on ABC News’s “This Week” last month, Pompeo claimed that he had “never heard” McKinley say anything about his concerns.

    “You know, from the time that Ambassador Yovanovitch departed Ukraine until the time that [McKinley] came to tell me that he was departing, I never heard him say a single thing about his concerns with respect to the decision that was made,” Pompeo told host George Stephanopoulos during the Oct. 20 appearance. “Not once, George, did Ambassador McKinley say something to me during that entire time period.”

    Asked whether he had ever been urged to issue a statement in support of Yovanovitch, Pompeo declined to say.

    “I’m not going to talk about private conversations that I had with my most trusted advisers,” he said.

    In his testimony, McKinley said he called Pompeo at one point and suggested that the State Department release a short statement of support for Yovanovitch, to praise her “professionalism and courage.” Pompeo, he said, listened without response.

    McKinley also told Pompeo on Sept. 30 that he was resigning in part due to the “lack of public support for Department employees.” Pompeo again did not respond, he said.

    These people just lie without any consequences.

  127. tomh says

    WaPo Opinion:
    The Supreme Court should not take up Trump’s tax-return case
    By Harry Litman
    November 4, 2019 at 3:42 p.m. PST

    Once again, a federal court — this time the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit in New York — has slapped down the outlandish arguments that President Trump’s lawyers have been making about presidential power. Now, Trump plans to ask for review in the Supreme Court, where the justices should refuse to take up the case.

    Trump v. Vance presented the most far-fetched legal argument the president has tried yet. As part of an ongoing criminal investigation, Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance Jr. served a subpoena in state court seeking Trump’s private business records, including his tax returns. The subpoena was served on Trump’s accountants, not even on Trump himself. The president turned around and brought his own suit in federal court seeking to have the subpoena declared invalid. His argument? That a sitting president is constitutionally immune from any form of investigation.

    This claim of “temporary absolute presidential immunity” is absurd, and the unanimous three-judge panel made quick work of it in its ruling Monday. Chief Judge Robert A. Katzmann canvassed a long line of Supreme Court opinions dating to 1807 — most notably the court’s unanimous decision in the Nixon tapes case — that foreclose the idea that the president, alone among citizens, occupies a law-free cocoon.

    The panel — three appointees of Democratic presidents — put its actual decision on narrow, and firm, ground. Its precise holding was that presidential immunity “does not bar the enforcement of a state grand jury subpoena directing a third party to produce non-privileged material, even when the subject matter under investigation pertains to the President.”

    The Justice Department entered the case on Trump’s behalf as well, making a more restrained argument that there should be a heightened showing of need in the case of a subpoena involving a sitting president. The court rejected that claim, too, because the Vance subpoena seeks documents that are not covered by executive privilege.

    Most lawyers would feel chastised after such a smackdown from the court of appeals (and a federal district court). But neither Trump nor his counsel is playing within the realm of typical professional boundaries.

    At oral argument, the court and the parties seemed to agree that the Supreme Court would be the final decision-maker. “We have the feeling that you may be seeing each other again in Washington,” Katzmann remarked.

    On Monday, Trump attorney Jay Sekulow immediately announced that the president would seek to have the justices agree to hear the case. Vance, in turn, has agreed to delay the subpoena’s enforcement pending the request for high court review, provided it occur this term — in other words, by the end of June.

    The case will provide a strong indication of how strong a backstop the president can expect in the Supreme Court, with two of his own appointees and at least two others known for their bullish views on executive power. Four votes are needed for the court to take the case.

    In fact, the 2nd Circuit’s opinion is so narrow and straightforward, and the president’s legal arguments so preposterous, that the case doesn’t merit Supreme Court intervention. It serves little purpose for the court to simply reaffirm the correctness of the 2nd Circuit’s reasoning. My prediction is that the court will let the case pass.

    Accepting it for review would send a strong signal that a majority is inclined to reverse the decision of the appeals court. That would represent a huge breach in the ultimate bulwark against presidential lawlessness — and signal the willingness of a conservative court to accommodate Trump’s extreme views about whether a president is, in fact, above the law.

    It doesn’t inspire confidence that you have to count on Roberts as the swing vote.

  128. says

    Here’s a link to today’s Guardian general election liveblog.

    Also, a Guardian update – “PM accused of cover-up over report on Russian meddling in UK politics”:

    Boris Johnson was on Monday night accused of presiding over a cover-up after it emerged that No 10 refused to clear the publication of a potentially incendiary report examining Russian infiltration in British politics, including the Conservative party.

    Downing Street indicated on Monday that it would not allow a 50-page dossier from the intelligence and security committee to be published before the election, prompting a string of complaints over its suppression.

    The committee’s chairman, Dominic Grieve, called the decision “jaw dropping”, saying no reason for the refusal had been given, while Labour and Scottish National party politicians accused No 10 of refusing to recognise the scale of Russian meddling.

    Fresh evidence has also emerged of attempts by the Kremlin to infiltrate the Conservatives by a senior Russian diplomat suspected of espionage, who spent five years in London cultivating leading Tories including Johnson himself.

    It can now be revealed that Sergey Nalobin – who once described the future prime minister as “our good friend” – lives in a Moscow apartment block known as the “FSB house” because it houses so many employees from the Kremlin’s main spy agency.

    The committee’s report is based on analysis from Britain’s intelligence agencies, as well as third-party experts such as the former MI6 officer Christopher Steele, and is subject to a final clearance from Downing Street. That has to come before parliament is dissolved on Tuesday if it is to be released ahead of the election.

    Grieve said: “The protocols are quite clear. If the prime minister has a good reason for preventing publication he should explain to the committee what it is, and do it within 10 days of him receiving the report. If not, it should be published.”

    The dossier specifically examines Russian attempts to interfere in the 2016 EU referendum. Members of the committee – which meets in secret because of the sensitivity of its work – had wanted to make recommendations to introduce greater safeguards ahead of the December poll.

    Ian Lucas, a Labour MP who sits on the culture media and sport select committee, which has conducted related inquiries into the conduct of the EU referendum said “the government needs to come clean about its view on Russian interference in British politics”.

    Committee members were also briefed on an extraordinary – and for a while an apparently successful – attempt to penetrate Conservative circles by Nalobin, who instigated a pro-Kremlin parliamentary group, the Conservative Friends of Russia.

    During his time in the UK, Nalobin went to exclusive Tory fundraising events and met senior Conservatives. In January 2014 he posed for a photograph with Johnson at an event at city hall in London. Nalobin posted it on Twitter, writing in a caption that the then mayor was “our good friend” who said “warm words” about Russians.

    Conservative Friends of Russia held its 2012 launch party in the Russian ambassador’s Kensington garden, with about 250 Russian and British guests present, including Tories who went on to play a prominent role in the referendum campaign. One was Matthew Elliott, now chief executive of pro-Brexit group Vote Leave, alongside Dominic Cummings, now the prime minister’s chief strategist.

    Another guest was Johnson’s future girlfriend Carrie Symonds, a Tory party activist. At the time she worked in the office of John Whittingdale, the pro-Brexit MP who was the group’s honorary vice-president. The group collapsed after revelations of Nalobin’s alleged ties with the Kremlin’s SVR foreign intelligence agency.

    Over the weekend, the shadow foreign secretary, Emily Thornberry, raised questions over Cummings’ connections to Russia, and the levels of security vetting to which he had been subject, after an official whistleblower raised concerns with her.

    The Guardian’s investigation was carried out with the The Insider, an independent Russian news website. Property records show that Nalobin owns an apartment at Michurinskiy Prospect 27, in south-west Moscow. The block’s ties with state spying are so well established that sellers are able to advertise their properties in the “FSB house” at above market rates.

    Peers held a special debate about the withheld dossier, after an urgent question from the cross-bench peer David Anderson, a national security expert, who insisted the delay was unjustified. “It invites, I’m afraid, suspicion of the government and its motives,” he said….

    Cadwalladr: “When wrote about [Nalobin] in Nov ‘17, @ObserverUK received 2 letters of complaint from Russian embassy accusing me of being a ‘bad journalist’ who had shown my ‘true colours’. Fun times”

  129. says

    CNN – “Giuliani associate in talks with impeachment investigators”:

    An associate of Rudy Giuliani — Lev Parnas — has initiated talks with impeachment investigators through his attorney.

    The attorney, Joseph Bondy, told the team from CNN’s “Anderson Cooper 360” that he had sent a letter to congressional investigators saying Parnas will comply with a congressional subpoena for his documents and testimony.

    However, Bondy said he would not use the word “cooperate.”

    Bondy also accused President Donald Trump of falsely denying he had a relationship with Parnas.

    Reuters first reported that Parnas was in talks with impeachment investigators.

    Bondy told The Washington Post on Monday that Parnas plans to “honor and not avoid” requests from Congress “to the extent they are legally proper while scrupulously protecting Mr. Parnas’ privileges including that of the Fifth Amendment” in avoiding self-incrimination.

    Trump has repeatedly denied knowing Parnas or his associate Igor Fruman, who was also arrested while trying to leave the country last month. In photos posted to a now-inactive Facebook page, Parnas and Fruman frequently sought to tout a close relationship to the President, his family and his advisers — including Giuliani.

    “I don’t know those gentlemen. Now it’s possible I have a picture with them because I have a picture with everybody, I have a picture with everybody here,” Trump said last month, adding that someone told him there “may be” a photo with them “at a fundraiser or somewhere, but I have pictures with everybody.”

    He continued, “I don’t know them. I don’t know about them. I don’t know what they do but I don’t know, maybe they were clients of Rudy. You’d have to ask Rudy, I just don’t know.”

    News footage reviewed by CNN’s KFile from an October 20, 2018, election rally in Nevada shows Parnas standing behind Trump.

    Bondy told The Post, “Any sentient being looking at the public record of the President and Parnas together — during intimate dinners, waving to each other at rallies, taking pictures together, and of Parnas’s alleged involvement with the President’s lawyer Rudy Giuliani — could divine that the President and Parnas knew each other.”…

  130. says

    Voting today across the US!

    FiveThirtyEight – “Everything You Need To Know About The 2019 Elections”:

    It may not be 2020 yet, but today is still Election Day for millions of Americans. You’ve probably heard about the major gubernatorial and state legislative races in Kentucky, Mississippi and Virginia, but chances are your hometown is holding local elections, too (check the website of your local elections authority to find out). Not only will the 2019 elections allow us to take the country’s temperature ahead of the knock-down, drag-out clash of 2020, but full control of state government is on the line for 25 million Americans. Here’s your guide to the biggest races of the day:…

    Daily Kos tracker.

    Taniel.

  131. says

    “Rees-Mogg sorry for saying Grenfell victims lacked common sense”:

    Jacob Rees-Mogg has apologised after claiming Grenfell Tower fire victims did not use “common sense” and leave the burning building.

    The leader of the House of Commons was widely criticised on Tuesday morning after he said the stay-put policy issued by the fire service had limited people’s chances of survival and he would have ignored it.

    In a statement issued to the Evening Standard, he said: “I profoundly apologise.”

    He added: “What I meant to say is that I would have also listened to the fire brigade’s advice to stay and wait at the time.

    “However, with what we know now and with hindsight I wouldn’t and I don’t think anyone else would.

    “I would hate to upset the people of Grenfell if I was unclear in my comments. With hindsight and after reading the report no one would follow that advice. That’s the great tragedy.”

    Rees-Mogg told the LBC radio host Nick Ferrari that if either of them had been in a fire they would “leave the burning building” and ignore the London fire brigade.

    The Justice 4 Grenfell group described his comments as “appalling”.

    The Labour leader, Jeremy Corbyn, tweeted: “What possesses someone to react to an entirely avoidable tragedy like Grenfell by saying the victims lacked common sense? People were terrified, many died trying to escape.

    “Jacob Rees-Mogg must apologise for these crass and insensitive comments immediately.”

    The shadow secretary for housing, John Healey, said it was shocking for Rees-Mogg to suggest that those who died in the Grenfell Tower fire lacked common sense.

    He said: “They were told to stay where they were by the fire service, who were acting on national guidelines. He must apologise.”

    The Lib Dem candidate for Kensington and Chelsea, Sam Gyimah, said the comments were insensitive and disgraceful….

    His comments are quoted atl, and he wasn’t at all “unclear.”

  132. says

    In the impeachment inquiry, House Republicans have not used their time wisely.

    From the Washington Post:

    […] Inside the secure room in the Capitol basement where the proceedings are taking place, Republicans have used their time to complain that testimony has become public, going after their colleagues who were quoted in media reports commenting on witness appearances, and quizzing witnesses themselves on how their statements had been released.

    From Dana Milbank, also writing for the Washington Post:

    [Republican members of the House] pursued one conspiracy theory after another involving the Bidens, George Soros, the Clinton Foundation, Hillary Clinton, the Obama administration, deep state social-media “tracking” and mishandling classified information. They ate up a good chunk of time merely complaining that Yovanovitch’s opening statement had been made public (which under the rules was allowed).

    Those Republicans sound like they have been brainwashed.

    Also, those Republicans didn’t really defend Trump, if that was their purpose. It’s like they are caught in a delusion loop.

    […] “Ambassador,” Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) interjected, “are you aware of anyone connected to you that might have given that [opening statement] to The Washington Post?”

    Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) interjected: “Did you talk to the State Department about the possibility of releasing your opening statement to the press?”

    Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-N.Y.) jumped in: “Ambassador Yovanovitch, do you believe that it is appropriate for your opening statement to be provided to The Washington Post?” […]

    Republicans didn’t respond to her testimony by trying to make Trump’s behavior look good; they probed for ways to make Yovanovitch look bad.

    They suggested she was part of a diplomatic conspiracy to monitor Trump allies such as Laura Ingraham, Lou Dobbs and Sebastian Gorka. They probed for damaging details on the Bidens (“Were you aware of just how much money Hunter Biden was getting paid by Burisma?”) and for ways to damage her credibility (“What was the closest that you’ve worked with Vice President Biden?”). Maybe Ukraine really did try to help Hillary Clinton in 2016, they posited. Maybe Ukrainian officials were “trying to sabotage Trump.” They asked if she ever said anything that might have led somebody to “infer a negative connotation regarding” Trump.

    Meadows, struggling mightily to prove some wrongdoing by Yovanovitch, found he couldn’t pronounce the names he had been given — so he spelled them out. “I’m sorry, I’m not Ukrainian,” he said.

    “Neither am I,” she replied.

    No, she’s what threatens Trump most: an honest American.

  133. says

    Guardian – “Don’t sign pledges on NHS or climate, Tory HQ tells candidates”:

    Conservative candidates in the general election will be told not to sign up to specific pledges on protecting the NHS from privatisation and trade deals or tackling climate change, according to a leaked internal document from party headquarters.

    The 11-page briefing note explains the party’s position on nine key areas and “strongly advises” prospective Tory MPs “against signing up to any pledges” unless they have been agreed from the centre.

    However, supporting shooting is allowed “as an important part of rural life”, the document says.

    Although the briefing sets out why signing up to certain pledges are unnecessary and could backfire, the demands from Tory HQ are likely to be seized on by opposition leaders, who insist the party cannot be trusted to keep its promises on certain important issues.

    The document, titled “Issue campaign responses”, gives an insight into how candidates will be expected to stick to a strict script, with little wriggle room beyond the template responses provided for them.

    Drafted by the Conservative research department last weekend, the memo acknowledges that candidates “will be asked to sign pledges on various campaign issues” and then sets out a cheat sheet of “substantive responses that can be used as a basis for a reply”….

    Document and more atl.

    Love this: “The party emphasised that it advised not signing pledges on trade deals and the NHS because ‘the NHS is not for sale and no trade agreement will change this fact’.” But whatever you do, candidates, don’t put your name on anything to that effect!

  134. says

    Sen. Van Hollen:

    Erdogan wants to assassinate Gen. Mazloum, the commander of the Syrian-Kurdish led forces who have led the fight against ISIS and helped us get Baghdadi and Trump wants to host Erdogan at the White House in [less than] 10 days?

    Sickening.

    This must not happen.

  135. says

    From Josh Marshall:

    I’ve been working my way through Ambassador Yovanovitch’s testimony.

    We’re so deep into the minutiae of this plot that we need to take a few paces back to see one of the most important parts of the story. […] The President is absurdly susceptible to foreign influence.

    Let me explain.

    […] Giuliani wanted manufactured charges against Biden and exoneration for Russia and Manafort. Getting rid of Yovanovitch was just the thing he had to provide to get it.

    Here you have what turned out to be a successful campaign to remove the US Ambassador to Ukraine. […] Later, if you read the portion of the testimony where Yovanovitch recounts her abrupt recall from Ukraine, something becomes clear. The urgency seems to have been that if Yovanovitch did not immediately leave the country Trump would go on Twitter and either tweet fire her or create some kind of incident. She describes the call and at first it seems like her State Department colleague was trying to get her back because of something physical threat to her life. Only slowly did the actual reason come through.

    Here’s where you need to step back a bit. A few two-bit, maybe three-bit hustlers have managed to take control of the President of the United States and have him not simply making decisions at their direction but actually operating outside any clear coordination with his own State Department. We need to see this as a proof of concept through which we see current US relations with Russia, China, Saudi Arabia and many other countries. Think what more sophisticated operators are able to do with him.

    This may sound like I’m trying to let Trump off too easily, portraying him as a soft touch or a patsy. Not really. I do get the sense here that Rudy’s telling him that Yovanovitch had to go was probably all he needed to hear. Hearing stories that she’d badmouthed him didn’t hurt either. I don’t get the sense that Trump knew or cared just why Parnas or Lutsenko wanted her out. Maybe he didn’t even know it was their ask. The point is it didn’t matter. Rudy was going to get Biden or spring Manafort or prove the Deep State was wrong about the Russians and that was all he needed to know. […]

    https://talkingpointsmemo.com/prime/pulling-his-strings

  136. says

    Adam Schiff in USA Today – “Trump betrayed America. Soon the public will hear from patriots who defended it.”:

    …On Sept. 24, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi announced an impeachment inquiry and tasked the Intelligence, Foreign Affairs, and Oversight and Reform Committees to ascertain the extent of the president’s misconduct. In the past few weeks, and despite the White House’s continued obstruction, we have learned a great deal about what occurred from those with firsthand knowledge of the call, and those who witnessed the president’s actions preceding and following it.

    What we have found, and what the American people will soon learn through the release of additional testimony transcripts and in public hearings, is that this is about more than just one call. From closed door interviews of current and former administration officials, text messages we have obtained, and public admissions by acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney and President Trump himself, we now know that the call was just one piece of a larger operation to redirect our foreign policy to benefit Donald Trump’s personal and political interests, not the national interest.

    The interviews we have conducted have been thorough, professional and fair, with over one hundred members from both parties eligible to attend — including nearly 50 Republicans — and equal time allotted for questioning to both Democratic and Republican members of Congress and staff. In line with best investigative practices first passed in Congress by the Republicans who now decry them, we have held these interviews in private to ensure that witnesses are not able to tailor their testimony to align with others at the expense of the truth.

    Over the past several weeks, dedicated, nonpartisan public servants have come forward to share what they know about the president’s misconduct based on what they witnessed over the course of months, describing and corroborating key details and events regarding U.S. foreign policy towards Ukraine. Nearly all have testified despite efforts by the White House to prevent them from telling their story. These career civil servants, diplomats and veterans of our armed services are American patriots and shining examples of what it means to defend and protect our Constitution.

    The witnesses have testified about the extent to which certain levers of government power were used in the service of the president’s political interests; whether congressionally approved security assistance to an ally was improperly withheld to give the president maximum leverage for his political demands; and whether a White House meeting, which Ukraine’s new president desperately sought as validation at home, was conditioned on Ukraine’s willingness to launch and publicly announce sham political investigations to discredit the unanimous conclusion that Russia interfered in the 2016 election and into President Trump’s potential political rival in 2020.

    On Thursday, the House passed a resolution that lays the groundwork for the next phase of our inquiry. This week, we have begun releasing the transcripts of interviews conducted with current and former government officials, and we will soon begin public hearings.

    For over a year, I resisted calls for an impeachment inquiry because impeachment was intended to be used only in extraordinary circumstances. But the Founders who devised our government understood that someday, a president might come to power who would fail to defend the Constitution or would sacrifice the country’s national security in favor of his own personal or political interests, and that Congress would need to consider such a remedy.

    Tragically, that time has come.

  137. says

    More from the Stone trial:

    Breaking: Roger Stone trial just recessed when a man, mid 40s screamed and fell into a seizure.

    …Roger Stone was not in the courtroom, having walked out sweating just minutes before accompanied by his wife.

    [The man] was shaking a little as he walked and is now sitting down in an upright position on the stretcher, medics strapping him in to wheel out.

    [Roger] Stone is still in the bathroom, after exiting the courtroom sweating over half an hour ago. Overheard his wife asking if he was ok about 15mins ago….

  138. says

    From Mark Sumner:

    Next to Donald Trump, there may be no White House figure who is so clearly headed to a future of prosecution and shame than Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. Yes, acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney assembled Trump’s “three amigos” hit squad to go twist arms in Ukraine and was directly responsible for pulling the plug on already approved military assistance. And sure, Secretary of Energy Rick Perry was actually on the ground, participating in creating an existential crisis for an allied nation in exchange for lies. Attorney General William Barr had his name literally all over the not-a-transcript of Trump’s conversation with the Ukrainian president. And Mike Pence was … there. But no one else was as deeply involved, and as deeply complicit, in every step of the process as Pompeo.

    What the record shows for Mike Pompeo—West Point and Harvard Law School graduate—is simply a staggering, staggering, degree of cowardice. Pompeo was the man in place between the diplomats trying to maintain a semblance of orderly foreign policy in the face of a Trump White House that was flip-flopping madly […]. It was up to Pompeo to maintain vital relationships, protect national security, and reassure allies even as Trump was breaking treaties and tossing his arm around tyrants. And he failed. He failed hard.

    Again and again, Pompeo was given the opportunity to salvage both America’s standing in the world and his own dignity. He was approached repeatedly by people on his own staff warning him about the damage being done and the genuinely criminal figures moving against the diplomatic staff. His staff. But rather than stand up for his people, Pompeo refused to help. More than that, he made himself utterly complicit in schemes to defraud the nation, destroy alliances, and demean the people he was supposed to protect.

    Donald Trump may be the main villain of the last four years. William Barr may be his most odious henchman. But no one defines utter failure to act in the face of wrongdoing like Mike Pompeo. […]

    Even when the situation was so bad that his own senior assistant was resigning in protest, Pompeo could not find the common decency to even acknowledge how he had failed his department and the nation. “I spoke with the secretary again when he called from Europe to discuss my resignation,” said McKinley. “I was pretty direct. I said, ‘You know, this situation isn’t acceptable. We need to you know, I’ve already made my recommendation, but … I am resigning.’ And that was the conversation. Again, I didn’t get a reaction on that point.” […]

    More at the link.

  139. says

    Trump disrespects Native Americans … again:

    Donald Trump just struck a blow for every white person who ever asked in February why there’s no White History Month. (Answer, as always: Because that’s every damn month.) Since a 1990 proclamation by Republican President George H.W. Bush, November has been Native American Heritage Month. Trump himself proclaimed Native American Heritage Month in 2017 and 2018, but in 2019 he decided to go full white nationalist, proclaiming November to be “National American History and Founders Month.”

    […] “From overthrowing tyrannical rule in the Revolutionary War to liberating Europe from Nazi control during World War II, the United States will always remain steadfast in our dedication to promoting liberty and justice over the evil forces of oppression and indignity,” the proclamation reads. “This same truth fuels us in our efforts to confront the challenges that face our citizens here at home, including protecting precious religious liberties, securing our Nation’s borders, and combating the opioid crisis.” […]

    Trump offers a charge that he himself has so blatantly ignored. “To continue safeguarding our freedom, we must develop a deeper understanding of our American story. Studying our country’s founding documents and exploring our unique history—both the achievements and challenges—is indispensable to the future success of our great Nation.”

    […] Donald Trump is endorsing the study of history of any kind?

    ”To continue to advance liberty and prosperity, we must ensure the next generation of leaders is steeped in the proud history of our country,” the proclamation proclaims. Hey, you know what else is part of the proud history of our country? Native American heritage. […]

    Link

  140. says

    From Wonkette:

    […] During the 72 years of the Russia investigation, because there was so much we simply didn’t know, there were often little trails to follow, and you never were sure if you were on the right path, until something would finally come out and tell you if you were completely wrong, or if you had been VINDICATED.

    One of those involved the weirdest thing that would come up time to time, involving a Russian oligarch — the fertilizer oligarch, in fact, so that’s some big shit, right?! — named Dmitry Rybolovlev, who bought a South Florida mansion from Donald Trump in 2008 for way too much money, and who during the Trump campaign just had a way of being close to Trump or his campaign team at the strangest of times. Or at least his plane or his yacht would be.

    In August of 2016, just after the Republican National Convention, a bunch of Trump people were bumpin’ uglies (their faces, we mean they were bumping their faces) in the Hamptons, and Rybolovlev’s plane just so happened to be there. Specifically Ivanka and Jared were around in the Hamptons at the time, along with a handful of others. Then the oligarch’s plane flew to Nice, and nobody knew where the Trump assholes were, because they had kinda gone radio silent. Then it flew to Dubrovnik, Croatia, at which point all of a sudden Ivanka Trump was Instagramming her big Croatian vacation, where she was hanging out with David Geffen and Wendi Deng, the ex-wife of Rupert Murdoch, who allegedly use to date Vladimir Putin, and who is possibly a Chinese spy who handles Ivanka and Jared! […]

    Oh and Rybolovlev’s yacht was also there in Dubrovnik at the time.

    Well, fast forward to the Mueller memos, and here is Steve Bannon, emailing somebody at Breitbart in 2017, not long before he was quit-fired from White House, and when his power struggles with Javanka were at fever pitch, and he said oh yeah, Javanka was vacationing with Wendi Deng AND A RUSSIAN OLIGARCH in Croatia at the time. […]

    the documents also show Bannon the very same day emailing with somebody at Breitbart about this story, about Jared doing weird dirty real estate deals with a “Soviet-born oligarch,” Lev Leviev, who was then involved in a huge money laundering case.

    Now, Leviev is a different oligarch from Rybolovlev — for one thing, Leviev is the “king of diamonds,” and Rybolovlev is the “king of fertilizer,” so that should tell you how different those two wild and crazy guys are!

    And the Mueller documents don’t mention Rybolovlev specifically, they just say “a Russian oligarch,” […] But we do know that it was Rybolovlev whose plane and yacht went from “Hamptons” to “Dubrovnik” the same time Javanka did that.

    When Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson testified for the House Intelligence Committee, Rep. Adam Schiff asked him if there were Trump-Russia things he thought warranted further investigation. This was specifically one of them. The story of why Dmitry Rybolovlev’s planes and boats just had this funny little way of following Jared and Ivanka from the Hamptons to Croatia. And more in general, Simpson said there had been “rumors” of meetings of Trump people and Russians on yachts in Dubrovnik during that time. How odd.

    […] unless it was entirely innocent and Jared and Ivanka bought some fertilizer at the Home Depot which automatically entered their names in a contest to spend a week in Croatia with the literal king of fertilizer and who among us who buys fertilizer at the Home Depot wouldn’t jump at the chance to spend a week in Croatia with the literal king of fertilizer, and maybe Jared and/or Ivanka won the contest, and that is all this is.

    Unless it isn’t.

  141. says

    SC @205, JFC indeed. “To say no to President Trump would be saying no to God.”

    And that seems to be a central part of the Trump cult. It is not a fringe thing. It is central.

  142. says

    CREW – “CREW, NSA and SHAFR Sue Pompeo and State Department Over Recordkeeping Failure”:

    Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and the Department of State broke the law by conducting an off-the-record shadow diplomacy in Ukraine, according to a lawsuit filed today by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), the National Security Archive (NSA) and the Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations (SHAFR).

    Secretary Pompeo and the State Department are likely violating the Federal Records Act, which requires “accurate and complete documentation” of agency policies, decisions, and essential transactions. At the direction of the president and his personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani, and with the knowledge of Pompeo, State Department officials used a secret and irregular channel that bypassed department recordkeeping systems to enlist the aid of Ukraine, at the behest of the president, to dig up dirt on the president’s political enemies. Further, in at least one instance a high-level State Department official directed that no one transcribe a call between State Department officials and Ukrainian President Voldymyr Zelenskyy. Officials regularly used encrypted messenger apps to conduct official business without ensuring that those messages are preserved.

    “Secretary Pompeo and members of the State Department are the latest in a disturbing pattern of officials, including the president himself, who have apparently broken the law in an effort to keep national security officials and the American people in the dark about the president’s misconduct,” said CREW Executive Director Noah Bookbinder. “It is beyond troubling when an agency as important as the State Department decides to destroy or hide records of conversations that threaten our democracy, rather than preserve them for the public.”

    In a related pending lawsuit, CREW, NSA and SHAFR allege that President Trump and and other White House officials, including Senior Advisor Jared Kushner, violated the Presidential Records Act by failing to create records of their meetings with Vladimir Putin, Kim Jong-Un, and Saudi officials. The latest revelations from the House impeachment proceeding suggest they were motivated by a desire to cover up evidence of presidential misconduct. The three groups were granted a temporary restraining order against President Trump and the Executive Office of the President following the allegations in the Ukraine whistleblower complaint, which compelled the government to immediately begin preserving records.

  143. says

    Transactional Trump: Trump hasn’t campaigned in Virginia, but he suggested this morning that voters in the commonwealth owe him because of the “massive amount” of money he’s spent on national defense.

  144. says

    Followup to SC’s comment 193.

    From Trump:

    The whistleblower should be revealed because the whistleblower gave false stories. Some people would call it a fraud. I won’t go that far. But when I read it closely, I probably would.

    Commentary:

    […] This offensive has all the subtlety of a sledgehammer. Trump, Rand Paul, and their allies don’t seem to care that the whistleblower told the truth. They’re similarly indifferent to the legal protections that are supposed to be extended to the person who helped expose White House wrongdoing.

    So why is it, exactly, that so many Republicans have embraced this crusade? In part as a means of distraction: trying to make the identity of the whistleblower relevant, when it’s not, is vastly easier than defending the president’s alleged misconduct.

    But it’s just as important to recognize the intimidation campaign against this and other witnesses. Trump World wants to leave little doubt in the minds of those who know about the president’s apparent misdeeds that they will become targets if they come forward and tell the truth.

    It’s what led George Conway, a conservative lawyer and prominent voice on Twitter, to write, “The attempts to out the whistleblower, apart from being illegal and substantively pointless, amount to despicable thuggery being encouraged by the president of the United States.”

    In a pair of tweets, Michael R. Bromwich, the former inspector general at the Department of Justice, added, “Outing the whistleblower has become the GOP’s white whale. It has no legitimate purpose. The consequences would be far-reaching and destructive–creates more personal risk to the whistleblower and deters reports of corruption and malfeasance…. Repeated attempts to unmask a whistleblower who is protected by law, and publicly urging others to do so? Seems like a high crime and misdemeanor.”

    Link

  145. says

    Q: Mr. President, according to several recent polls, more Americans want you to be impeached and removed from office than the number of Americans who don’t.

    TRUMP: Well, you’re reading the wrong polls. You’re reading the wrong polls.

    Q: Fox News, Wall Street Journal, NBC, ABC, Washington Post – all of those polls.

    TRUMP: You’re read- – let me just tell you, I have the real polls. I have the real polls.

    Trump’s denialism and delusions associated with polls are growing.

  146. says

    CNN – “FBI arrests alleged white supremacist accused of planning to bomb a Pueblo synagogue”:

    A 27-year-old man who allegedly espoused white supremacist ideology online was arrested by the FBI and accused of plotting to bomb a synagogue in Colorado.

    Richard Holzer had brought a knife and a mask to a motel room and was examining inert pipe bombs prepared by undercover agents moments before he was arrested late Friday, according to a criminal complaint.

    Holzer is charged with attempting to obstruct the free exercise of religious beliefs with the attempted use of explosives — a hate crime. In court documents, officials called him a domestic terrorist and described his alleged anti-Semitic ideology and desires for a racial holy war.

    According to the complaint, Holzer talked about killing Jews in forums online and shared video of himself casing a synagogue in Pueblo. He described himself as a skinhead, and shared pictures of himself with other social media users with guns and knives alongside white supremacist symbols, the complaint says.

    Holzer, according to prosecutors, wrote on one Facebook account: “I wish the Holocaust really did happen …. they need to die.”…

  147. Akira MacKenzie says

    @ 212

    Holzer, according to prosecutors, wrote on one Facebook account: “I wish the Holocaust really did happen …. they need to die.”…

    If you really think the Holocaust was so great, then why bother to deny it in the first place?

  148. says

    Axios – “Trump administration mulls privatizing national park campgrounds”:

    If the Trump administration has its way, our national parks may be set for a major overhaul that’s much broader than just electric bikes on trails.

    Driving the news: “At the urging of a controversial team of advisors, the Trump administration is mulling proposals to privatize national park campgrounds and further commercialize the parks with expanded Wi-Fi service, food trucks and even Amazon deliveries at tourist camp sites,” the LA Times reports.

    One proposal would phase out senior discounts during peak seasons.

    The big picture: “Since taking office, President Trump and his administration have sought to privatize an array of public services,” per the LA Times.

    “At the same time, the White House has sought to reduce spending for many public services, such as its plan to cut the National Park Service’s budget by $481 million in 2020.”

    Between the lines: Many members of the committee, which was created by former Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke, would potentially benefit from privatization, the Washington Post previously reported.

    Members include the operators of concession companies that have contracts at the parks, a company that produces electric bicycles and the former president of the world’s largest private campground….

  149. says

    Ian Dunt:

    In any sane world, Mogg’s Grenfell comments would be followed by a resignation. There’s no two ways about it. It’s a resigning matter.

    Instead, he’s apologised and they’ll just presumably keep him away from the TV stations for the duration of the campaign.

    Enter Tory MP Andrew Bridgen. I’m speechless.

    Also, someone really needs to leak the Russian interference report they’re criminally withholding.

  150. says

    From Sondland’s revised testimony:

    “I said that resumption of the US aid would likely not occur until Ukraine provided the public anticorruption statement that we had been discussing…” “I presumed that the aid suspension had become linked to the proposed anticorruption statement.”

    Recall that Trump and his allies had repeatedly cited Sondland’s “The President has been crystal clear no quid pro quo’s of any kind” text — sent after he spoke to Trump — as key evidence for Trump’s position.

  151. Akira MacKenzie says

    @ 221

    It looks like the GOP has decided to lean into the QPQ allegations, claiming that there was nothing illegal or impeachable about them, then trying to deny them. The fact that Hunter Biden was target the “anticorruption” investigations Trump wanted was merely a coincidence, right?

  152. says

    Kyle Cheney:

    READ: Sondland submitted this amendment to his testimony, saying other witnesses refreshed his recollection tha tmilitary aid was withheld as part of Trump’s push to get a Biden investigation going.

    WOW: Kurt Volker TEXTED to a top Ukrainian official the script they wanted Zelensky to read to announce the Burisma (i.e. Biden)/2016 election investigaitons.

    Amendment and text atl. A-mazing.

  153. says

    From the New York Times:

    It was Mr. Pompeo who helped Mr. Trump and Mr. Giuliani oust the respected American ambassador to Ukraine, Marie L. Yovanovitch, in April. Both Michael McKinley, a senior adviser to Mr. Pompeo and a four-time ambassador, and Philip T. Reeker, the acting assistant secretary for Europe, testified that they asked State Department leadership to defend Ms. Yovanovitch from false accusations, only to be rejected. Mr. McKinley said he personally urged Mr. Pompeo three times to issue a defense; the revelation of that detail in a transcript released on Monday undercut a declaration Mr. Pompeo made in an interview last month that he “never heard” Mr. McKinley “say a single thing” about Ms. Yovanovitch’s ouster.

    Two weeks ago, Mr. Pompeo did not speak out on behalf of the war veteran he asked to fill Ms. Yovanovitch’s job, William B. Taylor Jr., after Mr. Trump attacked the diplomat over his blistering testimony on the president’s quid pro quo demands. In fact, Mr. Pompeo has tried to block officials under him from testifying.

    At the same time, Mr. Pompeo is facing a revolt in the State Department. Confidence in his leadership has plummeted among career officials, who accuse him of abandoning veteran diplomats criticized by Mr. Trump and letting the president’s personal political agenda infect foreign policy.

  154. says

    Sneaky, unethical tactics employed by the RNC:

    The Republican National Committee funded a campaign that flooded the offices of about 36 House Democrats with more than 10,000 anti-impeachment phone calls in recent weeks.

    The campaign […] is just one part of the very diffuse defense Republicans have launched in an effort to shield President Donald Trump from a growing impeachment inquiry. Its goal […] was to both tie up Democratic lawmakers’ telephone lines and attempt to influence them into opposing that inquiry.

    While the strategies used by Republicans — including denying quid pro quo is wrong, attacking the whistleblower whose complaint led to the inquiry, and, despite evidence suggesting the opposite, that a White House memo of a call between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is exculpatory — have been varied, they largely focus on the claims that Trump did nothing wrong and that Democrats are being unfair.

    The calls seem to have focused on these talking points […] the campaign also reportedly rallied Republicans through robocalls and automated texts that encouraged voters to call the offices, and through call sheets handed out at Trump rallies that contained a script to be read to lawmakers’ offices.

    A spokesperson for the committee told the Times, “Our ‘stop the madness’ campaign has helped hundreds of thousands of voters get the information they need to reach out to their Democrat representatives and tell them to drop the phony impeachment inquiry and get back to work for the American people.”

    Much of Republicans’ efforts to influence perception of the impeachment inquiry have been focused on swaying the public. […]

    Link

  155. says

    From Wonkette:

    […] Here’s Rep. Mark Meadows, trying to distort an event where the Ukrainian government tried to justify detaining an anti-corruption protester and turn it into Marie Yovanovitch’s personal DO NOT PROSECUTE list:

    MEADOWS: So you don’ t recall weighing in with regards to that individual in any —

    YOVANOVITCH: I don’t think he was ever arrested or charged with anything.

    MEADOWS: I didn’t say that. I said did you weigh in in terms of putting guardrails in terms of —

    YOVANOVITCH: No.

    MEADOWS: — the treatment of that particular individual with anyone from the embassy?

    YOVANOVITCH: And can I — and I would also say, we don’t put guardrails on individuals.

    MEADOWS: 0kay. Well , let ‘ s change the words , because those are my words. So obviously you’ re saying we’re looking at it at it a little differently. And obviously with regards to the one individual, you did say you felt like they were getting a bum deal. Is that correct?

    Y0VAN0VITCH: Yeah. I think what we try to do is to talk about the principles that should govern the way, you know, whether it’s law enforcement or other things are conducted, but we don’t say yea or nay.

    YOVANOVITCH: So you’re saying that I weighed in. What was actually happening is that on this particular case with Mr. Shabunin, the presidential administration was weighing in with me and with us at the embassy, because they felt that we had influence with Mr. Shabunin and to see whether he could, you know, curtaiI his criticism, shall we say, of Mr . Poroshenko and events in Ukraine.

    And then when there was this incident, which I don’t recall very well, they raised that and said, you know, you see clearly he’s a bad apple — my words now, not theirs. And, you know, again, I said, well, you know, I mean, obviously you have processes, but they need to be according to the principles that we’ve been talking about for all this time.

    Q: And what did Mr. Sondland say when you talked to him about this topic?

    YOVANOVITCH: He hadn’t been aware of it, that the story had shifted, and he said, you know, you need to go big or go home. You need to, you know, tweet out there that you support the president, and that all these are lies and everything else. And, you know, so, you know, I mean, obviously, that was advice. It was advice that I did not see how I could implement in my role as an ambassador, and as a Foreign Service officer.

    (That’s right, Sondland told her to get on Twitter and kiss Trump’s ass. Prolly ’cause she didn’t have a spare million to donate to a Trump PAC to show her love for the Dear Leader.) […]

    Link

  156. says

    Bloomberg – “State Department Opposes Turkey Sanctions, Genocide Resolution”:

    The Trump administration opposes Turkey sanctions adopted by the House last week as well as a resolution condemning the Armenian genocide, arguing that the two initiatives risk further straining relations with a key NATO ally, a senior State Department official said.

    The administration is concerned that the sanctions — passed 403-16 in the House last week in response to the Turkey’s military offensive in northern Syria — will tie its hands and cut off options to resolve U.S. concerns about Turkey’s actions, said the official, who asked not to be identified discussing internal deliberations. The official wouldn’t say whether President Donald Trump intends to veto the bill….

    There really isn’t a State Department to speak of now. It’s Trump and his lackeys.

  157. says

    Sen. Harris: Has Mr. Giuliani made any formal representations, at least to the Justice Department or the FBI, regarding his foreign relationships, business dealings or conflicts of interest?

    FBI Director Wray: I’m not sure there’s anything I could say on that here.”

  158. says

    Okay. So. This text exchange from Sept. 22 shows that Pompeo has some serious questions to answer!

    What on earth does that last sentence mean and why would Giuliani be telling Volker which statement to use? Especially when he’s telling the same to John Solomon?”

    Pompeo is deep in the middle of this. And Solomon and Hannity are agents in the covert propaganda campaign.

  159. Kip Williams says

    As I’ve been saying on Twitter, the GOP is trying out a new plea: Guilty But Don’t Do Anything About It.
    They can call it Nolo Givacrap.

  160. says

    Taniel:

    before we start dissecting results, reminders that:

    nearly 10% of the voting-age population in both MS & KY are stripped of the right to vote for life,

    they are disproportionately Black (26% of Black adults in KY)

    and KY’s incumbent Gov personally re-disenfranchised half.

    commentary on Matt Bevin’s fate, or Jim Hood’s campaign tactics, or their implications about 2020, should probably make note of the conditions under which the elections are run.

  161. says

    Guardian – “Johnson delay on Russia dossier helps Putin, says Litvinenko widow”:

    The widow of Alexander Litvinenko has said Boris Johnson should not have suppressed the parliamentary report on Russian interference in British politics, saying the delay helps the Kremlin and feeds suspicions of a cynical government “cover-up”.

    Marina Litvinenko said the prime minister was in danger of making the same “mistake” as Theresa May, who as home secretary refused to hold a public inquiry into her husband’s murder in 2006 by polonium poisoning in central London.

    “I’m very disappointed. We saw the same thing in my husband’s case,” she said, as the deadline passed for clearing the keenly awaited intelligence and security committee (ISC) report on Russia for publication before the general election.

    Two Kremlin assassins poisoned Alexander Litvinenko, who was an FSB officer turned dissident, with a radioactive cup of tea. It took almost a decade before a public inquiry concluded the Russian state was responsible, in an operation “probably approved” by Vladimir Putin personally.

    Litvinenko said on Tuesday: “Putin’s goal is to create chaos and instability. He wants to interfere in elections in the US and Europe. The report makes recommendations to protect our system. By delaying, it looks like we are playing the same game. Putin can say we’re no different.”

    She said May’s refusal to publicise the facts surroundings her husband’s state-sponsored killing emboldened Moscow. Last year, Sergei and Yulia Skripal were poisoned with novichok in Salisbury – a plot May blamed on Russia’s GRU military intelligence agency. “We have another crime,” Litvinenko pointed out.

    The dossier, the product of 18 months’ work which was supported by research from Britain’s spy agencies and third-party experts, examines the threat posed by Russia to the UK, including its subversion and penetration of political institutions, plus Russian killings on British soil and the danger to British allies.

    Ministers have struggled to justify the withholding of the report, with Michael Gove, the chancellor of the duchy of Lancaster, saying only that the report “would be published in due course” and seeking instead to criticise Labour.

    Grieve warned MPs the dossier would now not be published until the committee reformed under the new government “and, in 2017, that took six months”.

    In a later statement, he said he was “extremely disappointed and baffled as to why the government has not given a reason why the report cannot be published”.

    “This has been a standard process, right up until the point that the prime minister – against the advice of the agencies themselves – stopped us from publishing. This must not be allowed to happen again,” Grieve said.

    Downing Street was left isolated in the Commons, with the vast majority of MPs on both sides calling for the document to be published….

  162. says

    I’m tired of news reports about how Yovanovitch “felt/feels threatened.” Numerous public statements, private comments and warnings to her, and Trump’s comment to Zelenskyy that she was going to “go through some things” can’t be reasonably interpreted as anything other than menacing. The story is that the US ambassador to Ukraine was harassed, undermined, smeared, recalled, and threatened by Trump and his henchmen. It’s not about her feelings. She felt threatened because she was threatened.

  163. says

    southpaw:

    No matter how much evidence investigators put in front of Republican Senators–and no matter how first-hand, grave, credible, and compelling it is–it makes not one bit of difference to how they feel and are convinced their base feels. So they stick their fingers in their ears.

    Give them the information they demand, and they’ll refuse to read it. Let them have their wish list for the hearings, and they’ll say it came too late.

    We can post all this stuff to shame Sen Graham, but it’s an empty effort. He doesn’t care. Whatever it is Trump offers him means more to him than any abstract duty he has as a Senator, the rule of law, or his own honor and reputation.

  164. says

    ABC:

    JUST IN: DOJ, DOD, DHS, DNI, FBI, NSA, and CISA release joint statement on 2020 election security, warning, “Russia, China, Iran, and other foreign malicious actors all will seek to interfere in the voting process or influence voter perceptions.”

    MORE: “In an unprecedented level of coordination, the U.S. government is working with all 50 states and U.S. territories, local officials, and private sector partners to identify threats, broadly share information, and protect the democratic process,” the agencies say.

    MORE: “While at this time we have no evidence of a compromise or disruption to election infrastructure that would enable adversaries to prevent voting, change vote counts or disrupt the ability to tally votes, we continue to vigilantly monitor any threats to U.S. elections.”

    Statement atl. I wonder why the timing.

  165. says

    David Fahrenthold:

    NEW: @realdonaldtrump’s company is showing new signs of financial decline. One major example: Trump’s Chicago hotel. New docs show its profits fell 89% in 3 years after Trump entered politics.

    Compare the balance sheets at @realDonaldTrump’s Chicago hotel from 2015 and last yr. Revenue fell, and they couldn’t cut expenses fast enough, so profits plummeted even faster.

    Earlier this yr, we reported that Trump Doral’s profits fell 70% from 2015 to 2017. We now see Trump Chicago followed a remarkably similar trajectory — with profits falling even further in 2018.

    One thing to watch: Trump hotels stake their identity on over-the-top luxury. As they cut costs, will guests notice the difference?
    At Doral, from 2015-2017, expenses fell 16%.
    Last wk, the @DailyMail found moldy pool chairs/broken elevator there.

    Last 2 wks at Trump Org:
    –Announced possible sale of their DC hotel
    –Redecorated NY ice rinks to downplay the Trump name
    –Court loss in fight over tax returns
    –NJ seeks to revoke its liquor licenses.
    –@dailymail finds Doral afflicted with moldy pool chairs/pooping iguanas.

    See Lynna’s #120 above for the Doral report.

  166. says

    Here’s a link to today’s Guardian general election liveblog.

    Ian Dunt – “Wave of scandal: The Tory party is becoming a sewer”:

    …Yesterday, a series of departing MPs made their valedictory speeches in the Commons. One after another, moderate Tories rose to announce their retirement. Many had already gone – either purged in the no-deal battle, or drifting off to support the Liberal Democrats. The rest simply don’t want a part of it anymore.

    One of them, David Lidington, made a last minute appeal to those who would come after him. “I hope the next parliament will make a deliberate effort to avoid the language of traitors, of betrayal, of vermin, of enemies of the people,” he asked.

    But there’s a fat chance of that. The entire moderate wing of the party has fallen away. And now we’re seeing what happens to a party – any party – that dedicates itself only to one of its extremes and jettisons those who doubt, who question, who reach across the aisle.

    The Tory party is becoming a sewer. If you audited a company with this kind of 24-hour record, you’d conclude that there was a fundamental cultural problem in the organisation and that it required root-and-branch reform. The same is true here. But it’s not going to happen.

    This is just the start. The campaign will get worse from here.

    Much more atl.

  167. says

    Julia Davis in the Daily Beast – “Thanks to Rand Paul, Russian Media Are Naming the Alleged Whistleblower”:

    Standing beside an approving Donald Trump at a rally in Kentucky on Monday night, Republican Sen. Rand Paul demanded the media unmask the whistleblower whose report about the president’s alleged abuse of power dealing with Ukraine sparked impeachment proceedings.

    American news organizations resisted the pressure, but—in a 2019 re-play of “Russia, if you’re listening”—Kremlin-controlled state media promptly jumped on it.

    Very quickly after Sen. Paul tweeted out an article that speculated in considerable detail about the identity of the whistleblower—with a photograph, a name, and details about the purported political history of a CIA professional—Russian state media quickly followed suit.

    As if on cue, the Kremlin-controlled heavy hitters—TASS, RT, Rossiya-1—disseminated the same information. But unlike Rand Paul, one of the Russian state media outlets didn’t seem to find the source—Real Clear Investigations—to be particularly impressive, and claimed falsely that the material was published originally by The Washington Post.

    This was the most egregious, but certainly not the only example of Kremlin-funded media cheerleading for Trump’s fight against impeachment as proceedings against him unfold with growing speed. As a chorus of talking heads on Fox News have picked up on Trump’s talking points, which is predictable—they’ve also been echoed across the pond, albeit with a tinge of irony.

    Russian experts, government officials, and prominent talking heads often deride the American president for his Twitter clangor, haphazard approach to foreign policy, clownish lack of decorum, and unfiltered stream of verbalized consciousness. But all the reasons they believe Trump “isn’t a very good president” for America are precisely their reasons for thinking he is so great for Russia.

    Since the current administration is proving to be beneficial for the Kremlin, the Russians are openly contemplating various strategies and conspiracy theories, designed to undermine President Trump’s political opponents….

    I take some comfort in the fact that they’re often quite clueless and believe their own propaganda:

    …As the evidence of abuse of power continues to mount, the beleaguered commander in chief is reduced to attacking the messenger. Trump repeatedly demanded that lawmakers and the media reveal the identity of the whistleblower, even though congressional testimony from multiple witnesses now being made public repeatedly and consistently supports the original allegations.

    Russian experts and analysts are openly hoping that the impeachment proceedings will have a side effect that would greatly benefit the Kremlin: “Impeachment will turn into the hunt for Ukrainians” and cause a serious rift between Kyiv and Washington.

    RIA Novosti columnist Ivan Danilov writes:

    “Some witnesses and sources of information, on which the charges against Donald Trump are based (and for which he, in fact, faces impeachment) are ‘Americans of Ukrainian descent’… At the same time, supporters of the current president are already demonstrating a clear willingness to use their background as the proof that they are ‘traitors to America.’ It isn’t as evident now, but after several months of actively promoting the thesis ‘Ukrainians are Clinton’s agents and the enemies of the United States, who are trying to overthrow Trump,’ a significant part of American society and the political elite will want nothing to do with Ukraine or the Ukrainian leadership, nor will they harbor any warm feelings toward the Ukrainian diaspora.”

    Danilov quotes Fox News, Glenn Beck, and The Federalist to demonstrate that a case against Trump is ultimately going to turn into a case against Ukraine….

  168. says

    AP – “AP sources: State Dept. worried about defending ambassador”:

    The State Department’s third-ranking official is expected to tell Congress that political considerations were behind the agency’s refusal to deliver a robust defense of the former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine.

    People familiar with the matter say the highest-ranking career diplomat in the foreign service, David Hale, plans to tell congressional impeachment investigators on Wednesday that Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and other senior officials determined that defending Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch would hurt the effort to free up U.S. military assistance to Ukraine.

    Hale will also say that the State Department worried about the reaction from President Donald Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, also one of the strongest advocates for removing the ambassador.

    Meanwhile, State Department Counselor T. Ulrich Brechbuhl, who was subpoenaed to appear before the impeachment inquiry on Wednesday, was on the plane with Pompeo, who departed early Wednesday morning for Germany. Two other witnesses who were scheduled for Wednesday — Russ Vought, the acting director of the White House Office of Management and Budget, and Rick Perry, the Energy secretary — are not expected to show up….

  169. says

    Update: #Iraq remains largely offline 41 hours after shutdowns were imposed restricting the voices of protesters, posing a direct risk to safety and limiting civil engagement at a critical moment for the country’s future #IraqProtests”

  170. tomh says

    WaPo:
    Trump’s ‘conscience rule’ for health providers voided by federal judge
    By Yasmeen Abutaleb
    November 6, 2019 at 9:36 a.m. PST

    A federal judge on Wednesday voided the Trump administration’s “conscience rule” that would have allowed health-care providers to refuse to participate in abortions, sterilizations or other procedures they disagree with on religious or moral grounds.

    U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer in Manhattan declared the so-called “conscience rule” unconstitutional in a 147-page decision stemming from a lawsuit brought by New York and nearly two dozen other mostly Democratic states and municipalities. The rule had been set to go into effect later this month.

    The lawsuit, led by New York Attorney General Letitia James, argued the rule illegally favored the personal views of health-care workers over the needs of patients and threatened to hobble the ability of state-run health-care facilities to provide effective care.

  171. tomh says

    NYT:
    The House Intelligence Committee will hold the first public hearings in the impeachment inquiry next week.

    House Democrats will begin convening public impeachment hearings next week, they announced on Wednesday, initially calling three marquee witnesses to begin making a case for President Trump’s impeachment in public.

    […]

    On Wednesday, November 13, 2019, we will hear from William Taylor and George Kent.

    On Friday, November 15, 2019, we will hear from Marie Yovanovitch.

    All three witnesses have already spoken privately with investigators. Ms. Yovanovitch testified that she had been removed because Rudolph W. Giuliani, Mr. Trump’s private lawyer, and his associates wanted her out of the way. Mr. Kent described career diplomats being shoved aside in favor of Mr. Giuliani and a shadow Ukraine policy being run out of the White House.

    And Mr. Taylor, whom Democrats consider perhaps their best witness, laid out behind closed doors how he came to understand from others within the administration that the entire American relationship with Ukraine came to depend on its leaders publicly committing to conduct investigations into Democrats that would benefit Mr. Trump politically.

    “Those open hearings will be an opportunity for the American people to evaluate the witnesses for themselves, to make their own determinations about the credibility of the witnesses, but also to learn firsthand about the facts of the president’s misconduct,” Mr. Schiff told reporters on Wednesday.

    The sessions will not look like traditional congressional hearings, where Democratic and Republican lawmakers alternate asking questions in five-minute blocks and witnesses can easily avoid answering unfavorable questions.

    The House voted along party lines last week to approve rules for an impeachment process for which there are few precedents. Those rules include allowing the top Democrat and Republican on the committee to designate questioning to trained staff and for each side to have up to 45 minutes at a time.

    Investigators have already begun publicly releasing the transcripts from the testimony of several witnesses this week, including Ms. Yovanovitch, ahead of the hearings.

    — Nicholas Fandos

  172. says

    From the Washington Post:

    * The House was 241-194 Republican after the 2016 election. Today, it’s effectively 235-199 Democratic.

    * Republicans held a historic 33-16 advantage in governor’s seats after the 2016 election. Today, it’s 26-24.

    * Republicans had a 32-14 advantage in state legislatures controlled after 2016. Today, it’s 30-19. (Some legislatures are split, with one party controlling one chamber, and the other party in a majority in the other.)

    * The GOP had total control over the governance of 24 states, vs. seven for Democrats. Today, it’s a much-closer 22-14.

    * Republicans had an advantage of 57 percent to 42 percent in nationwide state legislative seats after 2016. Today, that 15-point edge is trimmed to five, 52-47.

    Republican holds on power are weakening. The GOP still has a strong grip on the Senate. That needs to be weakened as well.

  173. says

    More made up numbers and general delusion from Hair Furor:

    Won 5 out of 6 elections in Kentucky, including 5 great candidates that I spoke for and introduced last night. @MattBevin picked up at least 15 points in last days, but perhaps not enough (Fake News will blame Trump!).

    Trump said later that the boost for Bevin, thanks to Trump, was “maybe 20.”

    No, there was no boost. Bevin seems to have lost points in part because Trump held a rally in Kentucky on the eve of the election. Bevin lost, in part, because he tied himself so closely to Trump and to Trumpism.

    Bevin still has not conceded, a particularly churlish move.

  174. says

    Kansas election news: Democrat Brandon Whipple won the mayoral contest in Wichita. He defeated the Republican Jeff Longwell by 10 points.

    Pennsylvania election news: Democrats how hold all five seats in Delaware County, a “Republican stronghold since the Civil War.”

    Drew Morgan cast an absentee ballot from the International Space Station. If he can vote in a Pennsylvania election, surely we other earthlings can manage to get it done.

  175. says

    The bad news from Mississippi:

    Republican Lt. Gov. Tate Reeves won the race for Mississippi governor Tuesday night, defeating Democratic Attorney General Jim Hood.

    Republicans were on track Tuesday to control all statewide elected offices in Mississippi and are expected to maintain super-majority control of the Legislature. It will be the first time since Reconstruction that Republicans control all statewide elected offices in Mississippi.

    Clarion Ledger link

    Reeves won 52.2% to 46.5%, which is a fairly good showing for the Democrat that lost. Trump won the state by 17 points in 2016. This year’s gubernatorial race results are the closest in Mississippi in two decades.

    Commentary from Steve Benen:

    […] Even if state Attorney General Jim Hood (D) had won the most votes, he almost certainly would’ve lost anyway: Mississippi operates under an unusual system, created in the Jim Crow era to undermine the electoral strength of the state’s African-American community, in which Hood also would’ve had to have won a majority of the state’s 122 legislative districts. If not, the election would go to state lawmakers, where Republicans have an overpowering majority. […]

    One of the consequences of the Republican win is that about 100,000 uninsured Mississippians will not get the healthcare benefits they would have received if the Medicaid expansion was approved.

  176. says

    Republicans complain, but they don’t show up to do the work: At the deposition for Ambassador Gordon Sondland, Roll Call noted that “Democrats outnumbered Republicans more than 2-to-1.”

    That’s not because GOP members were excluded; it’s because Republicans chose not to show up for the depositions they were invited to participate in.

  177. says

    Followup to comment 265.

    Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, told reporters Tuesday that he would not be reading two newly released deposition transcripts, calling the Democratic-led impeachment probe a “bunch of BS.”

    Graham’s comments came hours after House investigators released transcripts of the depositions of Gordon Sondland, ambassador to the European Union, and Kurt Volker, former U.S. special envoy to Ukraine.

    Washington Post link

    Commentary from Steve Benen:

    […] as the controversy first came to light, Graham said he wanted to see evidence of specific kinds of presidential wrongdoing. Now that evidence has been presented to him on a platter. If he were merely trying to move the goalposts, Graham would now call for entirely new kinds of evidence, but the senator is instead comfortable deeming all evidence irrelevant.

    […] Lindsey Graham’s reading habits have become a point of increasing concern. In July 2015, the South Carolinian condemned the international nuclear agreement with Iran, though when pressed, Graham conceded he hadn’t read it. In May 2019, Graham acknowledged that he hadn’t read the Mueller Report, either.

    As of yesterday, the Republican lawmaker, whose job ostensibly involves reading materials such as witness depositions in an impeachment inquiry, suggested he was adding this to the list of things he didn’t feel like reading.

    Lindsey Graham worked hard to earn a reputation as a serious and constructive senator in the eyes of the political establishment. I’m not sure what, if anything, he’ll able to do to reclaim that stature now that he’s carelessly tossed it aside.

  178. says

    Followup to comment 261.

    […] As the Louisville Courier-Journal reports, the Republican president of the Kentucky Senate has already started looking into how they could contest the election and throw it to a vote in the GOP-dominated state House of Representatives. Under Kentucky state law, the elections are certified by a state board of elections. Once that happens, Bevins has 30 days in which he could ask for a re-canvas or a recount. However, he could also contest the election. In that case, it would be up to a vote of the House and Senate to decide the winner. And in both chambers, Republicans have a majority. […]

    So the plan being contemplated is not to do a recount, or even a re-canvass of voting machines. Bevin could just go straight to the state Congress, then stroll back to the mansion, smiling all the way.

    Senate president Robert Stivers has already stated that this “legislature could decide the race” and Kentucky law states that contested elections “shall be determined by both Houses of the General Assembly, according to such regulations as may be established by law.” Republicans are now reviewing the rules and regulations around those contests to see if there’s something that says they can’t simply seat the candidate of their choosing. And there may be nothing to stop them.

    Stivers seems prepared to argue that Bevin is the real winner because 2% of the vote went to the Libertarian candidate. And if there had been no Libertarian candidate, “most of those votes … would have gone to Bevin.”

    […] they could just steal the Libertarian votes, give them to Bevin, declare him the winner, and call it a day. And when they’re done, Trump will probably give them a tweet of congratulations.

    Link

  179. Akira MacKenzie says

    One of the consequences of the Republican win is that about 100,000 uninsured Mississippians will not get the healthcare benefits they would have received if the Medicaid expansion was approved.

    Don’t worry, I’m sure they’re all good born-again Christians who will no doubt think they’ll go to heaven after they die from the ailments they can’t afford to treat.

    Left-wing commentators like to say these rubes vote against their own best interests. I say they don’t even know what they’re best interests are.

  180. tomh says

    WaPo:
    Live updates: Acting ambassador says it was his ‘clear understanding’ U.S. military aid would not be sent until Ukraine pursued investigations

    By John Wagner and Felicia Sonmez
    November 6, 2019 at 11:21 a.m. PST

    BREAKING: House impeachment investigators released the transcript of William B. Taylor Jr.’s testimony in which he testified about President Trump’s pressure on Ukraine to benefit him politically.

    In one exchange, Taylor was asked whether the military aid was conditioned on investigations. “That was my clear understanding, security assistance money would not come until the President [of Ukraine] committed to pursue the investigation,” Taylor testified.

    This is a developing story and will be updated

  181. tomh says

    WaPo:
    Trump’s taxes: Judge inclined to allow House lawsuit seeking president’s returns to proceed
    By Ann E. Marimow
    November 6, 2019 at 12:13 p.m. PST

    House Democrats have a “really strong argument” that the law requires the Trump administration to turn over the president’s tax returns, a federal judge said Wednesday even as he urged Congress and the executive to resolve the dispute outside of court.

    U.S. District Judge Trevor N. McFadden, who was nominated by President Trump, suggested he was inclined to allow a House lawsuit — which invokes a 1924 law about the committee’s particular authority to seek tax returns — to move forward despite the Justice Department’s assertion the court should stay out of a political fight.

    The chairman of the House tax-writing committee sued the treasury secretary and the head of the IRS this summer after the agencies refused to comply with a congressional subpoena for the president’s returns.

    The case, which predates the impeachment inquiry, is one of several legal battles over access to Trump’s financial records that seem destined to reach the Supreme Court. But the lawsuit from House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Richard E. Neal (D-Mass.) is distinct from others seeking similar information. House Democrats and legal experts point to the 1924 law that gives the chairmen of the tax committees the authority to obtain the returns of any taxpayer.

    During a court hearing Wednesday, McFadden told Justice Department lawyers that the House has a “really strong argument that you’re supposed to turn this over.” The judge said he was “dubious” about the department’s position that he should dismiss the House lawsuit at this early stage.
    […]

    Justice Department attorney James Burnham urged the judge to dismiss the case and let Congress and the executive work out their differences through negotiations. Allowing the case to proceed, Burnham said, would cause “major upheaval” and lead to an onslaught of subpoena fights in court.

    The president’s private attorney William S. Consovoy, who was also in court Wednesday, has called the request from the Ways and Means Committee a “gross abuse of power” that encroaches on taxpayer privacy.

    McFadden invokedTrump’s acting chief of staff, Mick Mulvaney, who has said Democrats will “never” see the president’s tax return. The judge asked what else Congress could do when the administration refused to comply.

    House lawyer Megan Barbero said the law clearly states that the treasury secretary “shall furnish” tax return information requested by the tax-writing committee. “Even in politically fraught cases,” she said, “it is the duty of the court to weigh in and say what the law is.”
    […]

    Things look bleak when you can’t even count on your own judges.

  182. says

    Livetweeted thread from the opening day of Roger Stone’s trial yesterday.

    Rachel Maddow last night – “Stone Trial Opens New Window On Trump’s Awareness Of Russian Help”: “Rachel Maddow looks at the prosecution’s opening statement in the trial of Roger Stone and points out that as much as much as this trial is about Stone, it is also significantly about what and when Donald Trump knew about Russia’s effort to help his 2016 campaign.”

  183. says

    CNN – “Washington Post: Trump asked for Barr to host news conference clearing him on Ukraine”:

    President Donald Trump asked that Attorney General William Barr hold a news conference clearing him of legal wrongdoing with regard to his phone call pressuring the Ukrainian President to investigate Democrats — but Barr refused, The Washington Post reported on Wednesday.

    Citing people familiar with the matter, the paper reported that Trump’s request came sometime around the White House’s September 25 release of a transcript of the call. It was conveyed to White House officials and then the Justice Department. Trump has brought up Barr’s refusal to aides over the past few weeks and how he wishes the attorney general had held the news conference, Trump advisers told the Post.

    The Justice Department did not comment when reached by CNN on Wednesday. Overnight, Trump denied the report, calling it “untrue” and again attacking the media.

    Even without a news conference from the attorney general, the Justice Department gave the President nearly everything he wanted. In an orchestrated rollout alongside the release of a transcript of Trump’s Ukraine call, the department publicly announced that criminal division prosecutors had found no wrongdoing by the President, at least as it relates to campaign finance law.

    The department also released a legal memo on why the intelligence community’s inspector general was not required to turn over a whistleblower complaint to Congress.

    Despite efforts to publicly declare the matter as case closed, it is clear that the Ukraine interactions and the role of Rudy Giuliani, the President’s personal lawyer, are still at the heart of an investigation led by federal prosecutors in New York….

  184. says

    Law & Crime – “Former Florida AG Once Suspected of Engaging in ‘Quid Pro Quo’ with Trump to Join Impeachment Team”:

    President Donald Trump is hiring two new aides as the White House prepares for what could be a protracted impeachment battle.

    According to the Wall Street Journal, senior officials in the Trump administration are preparing for the additions of former Florida attorney general Pam Bondi, and former Treasury Department spokesman Tony Sayegh. Both received employment offers this week and, pending finalization of contractual details, are expected to join the White House on a temporary basis Thursday to assist on communications and bolster the administration’s impeachment strategy, in addition to other “special projects.” [LOL – SC]

    …Bondi has previously been mentioned as a possible candidate for several prominent positions in the Trump administration, including replacing Jeff Sessions as Attorney General. Bondi would have likely faced significant difficulties in being confirmed, however, due to a controversial $25,000 contribution Trump made to her 2014 reelection campaign as Florida’s attorney general.

    Trump’s generous contribution to the Bondi’s “And Justice For All” political action committee coincided with her office’s review of allegations of marketing fraud against Trump University. Bondi’s office ultimately opted not to pursue a criminal investigation into the now-defunct seminar series, leading to accusations of an arrangement that constituted a “quid pro quo” deal….

    In fact, the contribution came from the Trump Foundation which tried to hide it, adding more levels of illegality:

    In March 2016, CREW discovered that the Trump Foundation had broken the law by giving an illegal $25,000 contribution to a political group supporting Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi. Charitable foundations like the Trump Foundation are not allowed to engage in politics. Even more problematic was the fact that the contribution was given as Bondi’s office was deciding whether to take legal action related to Trump University. This would set off an investigation which would lead to one of the biggest stories of the year….

  185. says

    CNN on Jennifer Williams, who’ll be testifying today in the impeachment inquiry – “Pence aide likely to testify in impeachment inquiry”:

    A senior adviser to Vice President Mike Pence is likely to comply with a request to testify on Thursday in front of the committees leading the impeachment inquiry, multiple sources say.

    Jennifer Williams would be the first person on Pence’s national security team to appear and has knowledge of how much the vice president knew about the efforts by President Donald Trump and those around him to push Ukraine to launch investigations into Joe Biden and his son, as well as 2016 election interference, according to a source familiar with her thinking.

    Williams, along with other senior administration and national security officials, was listening to the phone call on July 25 in which Trump asked for a “favor” of his newly-elected Ukrainian counterpart, President Volodymyr Zelensky, a White House source says….

    Williams, a longtime State Department staffer, is detailed to Pence’s office as special adviser on European and Russian affairs and was one of two Pence aides on the call. The other was Gen. Keith Kellogg, the vice president’s national security adviser, who has not yet been called to testify.

    Pence did not listen in, but a transcript of the call was put into Pence’s daily briefing binder, an administration source says.

    Lawmakers will look to Williams to explain what Pence knew and when, something the source familiar with Williams’ thinking says she is able to do.

    Over a month after the call, Williams traveled with Pence to Warsaw when he stood in for Trump and met with Zelensky on September 1. After that meeting, Pence said they discussed corruption in Ukraine and evaded a question about whether the hold up of almost $400 million in security aid for Ukraine was tied to Giuliani’s efforts to dig up dirt on Joe and Hunter Biden. There is no evidence of wrongdoing by either Biden in Ukraine.

    Since then, Pence has insisted that Trump did nothing wrong but has not clarified how much he knew about efforts to pressure Ukraine and the parallel Ukraine policy Giuliani and others were leading outside the normal diplomatic and official channels….

  186. says

    Daily Beast – “Alex Jones Goes on Tirade Against Roger Stone Jurors”:

    InfoWars conspiracy theorist and Roger Stone ally Alex Jones stepped up his attacks on the jury at Stone’s trial on Tuesday, broadcasting the name and face of a woman he claimed was a juror at the trial and calling her a “minion” of anti-Trump forces.

    “We’ve got her name, and we’re going to release it,” Jones said on his InfoWars broadcast, before revealing a woman’s name and putting her face on the screen behind him.

    Later in the broadcast, Jones and his attorney were joined by a person dressed as the Grim Reaper and wielding a sickle. Stone hosted a show broadcast on InfoWars until recently, and Jones and his employees have frequently attacked the judge in Stone’s case, Judge Amy Berman Jackson.

    Jones’ attacks on the jury were based on reporting that the first potential juror in the case was a former Obama administration employee in the Office of Management and Budget whose husband works for the Department of Justice. But in his rush to attack the potential juror as a deep-state plant, Jones appears to have gotten the wrong person.

    During his broadcast, Jones didn’t show a picture of the actual potential juror, who, despite his claims, didn’t make it onto the jury anyway. Instead, he showed a picture of another former OMB staffer who appears to be totally unrelated to the Stone trial.

    This wasn’t Jones’ first attack on the jury—or his first that implied a threat to launch his legions of harassing fans at any jurors who find Stone guilty on witness tampering and obstruction charges….

  187. says

    Daily Beast – “Ukrainian President Was Booked to Announce Biden Investigation on CNN, Says Report”:

    The Ukrainian president was booked to make a statement about opening an investigation into the Biden family in a CNN interview before fate intervened, The New York Times reports. Volodymyr Zelensky’s staffers had reportedly conceded it was inevitable that he’d have to bow to President Trump’s demands to announce investigations against his political enemies or permanently lose millions in military aid. Aides were approached in September by Gordon Sondland, U.S. ambassador to the European Union, who made clear there was little chance of aid being given until there was a public statement. Trump wanted the Ukrainian president to speak on CNN, and Zelensky’s staff planned for him to make an announcement on September 13 in an interview with the network’s Fareed Zakaria. However, two days before the scheduled interview, news of the military aid delay leaked and Congress was furious. The Trump administration was forced t0 release the aid and the spot was cancelled, according to the report. “The Zelensky team was ready to make this quid quo pro,” said Petro Burkovskiy, an academic who has close ties to the Ukrainian government.

    Andrew Prokop:

    A coda to this NYT piece on Pres. Zelensky planning to give the CNN interview until luck spared him…

    Taylor testified that he was worried around 9/13 that Z would still go through with it. Encouraged him not to, but “body language” suggested he might.

    “Bipartisan support of Ukraine in Washington is your most valuable strategic asset, don’t jeopardize it,” Taylor says he told Zelensky.

    “Don’t interfere in our elections, and we won’t interfere in your elections.”

    Taylor transcript excerpts atl.

  188. says

    Reuters – “U.S. senators press for sanctions on Turkey if it is violating Syria ceasefire”:

    Republican and Democratic U.S. senators asked President Donald Trump’s administration on Wednesday to let them know – and to respond with touch sanctions – if reports are true that Turkey is violating a ceasefire agreement in Syria.

    “Given the stakes, time is of the essence,” Republican Senators Lindsey Graham and Marsha Blackburn and Democratic Senators Chris Van Hollen, Richard Blumenthal and Jeanne Shaheen wrote in a letter to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo.

    Those senators have been among the loudest voices in the U.S. Congress lamenting Trump’s decision to withdraw U.S. forces from much of Syria, which many see as abandoning Kurdish forces who fought for years alongside U.S. troops as they battled Islamic State militants.

    In the letter, the senators cited reports that Turkish forces are operating outside an agreed-upon “safe zone” in northeastern Syria, and that Turkish or Turkish-backed forces are attacking Syrian Kurds near Tal Tamr.

    “On several occasions, President Trump has threatened to ‘destroy Turkey’s economy’ should Turkey violate its obligations,” they wrote in the letter.

    “In keeping with this position, we ask that the Administration take swift measures to enforce the October 17 agreement with tough economic sanctions,” they said, adding they would continue to seek passage of a sanctions bill in Congress.

  189. says

    France 24 – “France’s Macron says NATO experiencing ‘brain death'”:

    French President Emmanuel Macron said he believed NATO was undergoing “brain death,” lamenting a lack of coordination between Europe and the United States and unilateral action in Syria by key member Turkey, in an interview published Thursday.

    “What we are currently experiencing is the brain death of NATO,” Macron told The Economist magazine.

    The president’s explosive comments, appearing to question the very future of NATO, threatened to send shock waves through the alliance ahead of a summit in Britain next month.

    “You have no coordination whatsoever of strategic decision-making between the United States and its NATO allies. None,” said Macron.

    “You have an uncoordinated aggressive action by another NATO ally, Turkey, in an area where our interests are at stake,” he added, according to an English transcript released by The Economist.

    Turkey’s latest military operation against Kurdish forces in northern Syria was staunchly opposed by fellow members like France, but made possible by a withdrawal of US forces ordered by President Donald Trump.

    “There has been no NATO planning, nor any coordination,” Macron said.

    And while NATO works well in communicating between armies and commanding operations, “strategically and politically, we need to recognise that we have a problem,” he said.

    “We should reassess the reality of what NATO is in light of the commitment of the United States,” he warned, adding that “In my opinion, Europe has the capacity to defend itself.”

    Macron said that while “it’s not in our interest” to expel Turkey from NATO — as has been urged by some politicians — members states should “reconsider what NATO is.”

    And he emphasised it was crucial to seek a rapprochement with Moscow, which regards NATO and its expansion into ex-Communist bloc states with huge suspicion since the alliance was set up to counter the USSR.

    “We need to reopen a strategic dialogue, without being naive and which will take time, with Russia,” said Macron, who is seeking to broker an end to the conflict in Ukraine and has courted President Vladimir Putin as a partner.

    He said NATO did not reexamine its future in the early 1990s after the collapse of the Soviet Union and “the unarticulated assumption is that the enemy is still Russia.”

    “So, the question about the present purpose of NATO is a real question that needs to be asked”, especially by the United States where Trump sees the alliance as a “commercial project”, he said.

    And Macron said he believed that Putin, for all the anti-Western bombast from the Kremlin, would find his strategic options limited, in the long term, to “a partnership project with Europe.”

    “If we want to build peace in Europe, to rebuild European strategic autonomy, we need to reconsider our position with Russia,” said Macron.

    He praised the stance on the issue of Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban — criticised by many in Europe for being authoritarian and close to the Kremlin.

    “He’s quite close to our views and has a key intellectual and political role” in central Europe, said Macron.

    Macron said it was a time of turmoil with Europe losing track of history, a risk of the US and China becoming the sole global powers, and authoritarian regimes emerging in its neighbourhood.

    “All this has led to the exceptional fragility of Europe which, if it can’t think of itself as a global power, will disappear, because it will take a hard knock,” he said.

    Macron’s statements and actions for the past few months pose a serious danger for the people of Europe, in my view. His presentation of the issues is ignorant, stupid, or worse, not to mention incoherent.

  190. says

    Lindsey Graham is throwing lies around like he wants to challenge Trump for the Liar-in-Chief title:

    When Fox News host Martha MacCallum asked the notorious Trump defender about Schiff saying that the release of testimony transcripts prove that the “most important facts are largely not contested,” Graham said “that statement is full of crap” before stoking a conspiracy accusing Sondland of switching up his testimony because of a “connection” with Democratic operatives.

    “Why did [Sondland] change his testimony?” Graham said. “Was there a connection between [Sondland] and Democratic operatives on the committee? Did he talk to Schiff? Did he talk to Schiff’s staffers?”

  191. says

    From the New York Times:

    President Trump’s personal lawyer, Rudolph W. Giuliani, said on Wednesday that he had assembled a legal team to represent him in the criminal investigation into his activities related to Ukraine, an announcement that came after weeks of sputtered attempts to find a lawyer willing to take him on as a client.

    Mr. Giuliani said on Twitter that he would be represented by three lawyers, including his longtime friend, Robert J. Costello.

    The NYT article also says that “at least four prominent attorneys” declined to represent Giuliani. That sounds like a smart move on their part.

  192. says

    Report from the Rojava Information Center – “Turkey’s track record: The occupation of Afrin”:

    This report presents the situation of the Afrin region of North and East Syria, which has been under Turkish occupation since March 2018. As the regions of Sere Kaniye and Tel Abyad and surrounding countryside have fallen under control of Turkey and its proxies, useful parallels can be drawn from studying Turkey’s track record in the occupation of Afrin.

    Prior to occupation, Afrin was part of the democratic system of the Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria, and enjoyed a relatively high level of stability, economic prosperity and gender equality. Since the area has been taken over by Turkish backed forces – many of which subscribe to jihadist ideology – the people of the region are experiencing forced displacement, demographic engineering, human rights violations and widespread violence.

    Report atl.

  193. says

    From Mark Sumner:

    Attorney General William Barr is racing to complete a new “report” before Thanksgiving. And if Barr’s very poor summary of the Mueller report threw Trump a lifeline by distorting the real findings of the special counsel investigation, this new report looks to be more like an atom bomb, designed to incinerate Washington by putting the whole Justice Department behind a conspiracy theory that rewrites history and declares open warfare on political opponents. And Republicans are already meeting with Barr to plan a “roll out” for this supposedly classified report in order to maximize its impact.

    Barr appears to have taken the results of an inspector general report that was expected to end weeks ago, rolled it together with the investigation-into-the-investigation that he launched under the nominal control of prosecutor John Durham, and capped it all with the “findings” of a world tour that included attempts to get the Australian government, the Italian government, and the U.K. government to participate in attacks on U.S. intelligence agencies. […]

    As The Washington Post reports, Barr has subsumed Horowitz’s work because “the inspector general does not have the authority to declassify information” and Barr apparently intends to release information that dips into classified documents at both the FBI and CIA to tell his story of how the Russia investigation was unjustified from the start. […]

    Barr is directly attempting to [prove] that there was never any real contact between Russia and the Trump campaign, that the DNC servers were not in fact hacked by Russia, that Maltese professor Joseph Mifsud was a CIA plant put in place to lure George Papadopoulos, that Australian official Andrew Downer was an instrument of U.S. intelligence, and that Ukrainian hackers conspired with Hillary Clinton to make it seem as if Russia stole data from the DNC and presented it to WikiLeaks, when all the while it was a scheme to justify launching an investigation into the Trump campaign.

    Barr and his associates have been racing to complete this report so that it can be dropped on the impeachment inquiry before the holidays. […]

    Barr did not shift to a criminal investigation because he doesn’t intend to arrest someone. There are going to be claims of serious wrongdoing. They are going to be aimed at not just creating a distraction to derail the impeachment hearings, but to provide “evidence” that Trump’s requests for investigations by Ukraine were justified. The question is going to be whether they are merely awful and damaging to the nation, or absolutely incinerate the rule of law. […]

    If even part of the above analysis is true, then William Barr is not refusing to cross more ethical lines when he comes to Trump. He is planning to blow up everything for Trump’s benefit.

  194. says

    NewsChannel5-Nashville – “Nashville Kurdish community collects donations for Syrian Refugees”:

    Donations from around the world are coming into Nashville to help Kurdish residents forced from their homes in Syria.

    The effort started with a simple call for help on Facebook. Nasvhille resident Nejeer Zebari said in the post, since Turkey launched its offensive into Northern Syria, thousands of Kurdish people have been displaced. The numbers are expected to keep growing.

    After Zebari’s post, he said he has been bombarded with trucks full of donations.

    “Thousands of toothbrushes, diapers, soap, coats, just about everything,” said Zebari. “It’s an insane amount.”

    Donations have been collected at Zebari’s business on Nolensville Pike. All the items were moved to a home in South Nashville to be sorted.

    The primary needs are warm clothes, shoes, personal hygiene items and medical supplies. Items that can’t be used will be donated to Nashville non-profits.

    All donations will be shipped directly to a refugee camp in the Kurdistan region of Iraq.

    “People are arriving without anything,” said Silav Ibrahim, who helped sort donations. “This will make a huge difference.”

    “I hate that we’re doing it because people are suffering,” added Zebari. “But, I’m glad we can help.”

    Many of the members of the Nashville Kurdish community who helped sort the donations have spent time in refugee camps, and say the situation in Syria hits close to home.

    “We’ve all been in their shoes at one point in our lives,” said Zebari….

    As noted in an earlier thread, around a third of US Kurdish people live in Nashville.

  195. says

    From Wonkette:

    Now that NO QUID PRO QUO! has given way to QUID PRO QUO, BUT THE GOOD KIND!, the GOP is casting about for something to distract from President Crimetime’s one million felonies. What they need is a villain! Someone for the public to blame besides Donald Trump, the guy who did all the crimes. So they’ve settled on the whistleblower, the good samaritan who risked his career to call 911. It’s a tricky maneuver, since every single witness has confirmed his account and Donald Trump himself released the transcript of himself extorting the Ukrainian president. To sell this storyline, they’re going to need someone with a light touch, someone charismatic and trustworthy. Someone with really good hair.

    Unfortunately, all they’ve got is Rand Paul and Don Jr. […]

    Rand Paul, who formerly advocated for the rights of whistleblowers and even received an award in 2013 from the Make it Safe Coalition, a whistleblower advocacy group, has executed a full face-turn. Now he insists that the media is obligated to out whistleblowers because CONSTITUTION. […]

    Jamie will be around to lawsplain you why this is absolute horseshit in a hot second. But the short version is, you only have the right to confront your accuser in a criminal trial, and then only if that accuser’s testimony is being relied upon in court. Impeachment isn’t a criminal proceeding […] and the House isn’t relying on the whistleblower’s account because they have the transcript and the testimony. And, by the by, it’s pretty fucking rich for the White House to make process complaints when they have systematically obstructed Congress by refusing to allow anyone to testify or provide documentary evidence against the president. […]

    Fixating on the whistleblower’s identity serves only to endanger him and his family and to discourage anyone else from coming forward. But witness intimidation is very on-brand for the GOP, so of course the entire Republican establishment, minus Chuck Grassley, is now howling to put the whistleblower on national television and prove he’s a Democratic operative. […]

  196. says

    The first public hearings, with Bill Taylor and George Kent, will be next Wednesday, the 13th (see tomh’s #259 above). Trump has scheduled Erdoğan’s visit for the same day, both as a distraction and an opportunity to propagandize (for Erdoğan as well). I’m sure there will also be protests. The cable news networks have important choices to make about what they’ll cover and how. I hope they do the right thing.

  197. says

    An explanation for the “[Sondland]” brackets in Lindsey Graham’s statements, as shown in comment 286:

    Graham kept referring to Gordon Sondland as “Sunderland.” Apparently, Graham still hasn’t read any impeachment inquiry transcripts, and he hasn’t learned the names of the people involved, nor of the people testifying. Maybe he thinks that if they are not named Trump, he does not have to bother learning their names.

  198. says

    From Laura Clawson:

    Here we go again. Sen. Elizabeth Warren has risen in the polls to the point where her rivals are using the tired old likability attacks, even knowing that much of the coverage about it will involve questions of sexism. Former Vice President Joe Biden’s campaign is also recycling a Republican talking point straight out of former Sen. Scott Brown’s (losing) campaign against Warren in 2012: that she’s an elitist Harvard professor. Is it possible to yawn and rage at the same time? Because those are the conflicting impulses I’m feeling from these attacks.

    Me too. And, frankly, that’s an embarrassing move on Joe Biden’s part.

    The elitism attacks are particularly rich coming from the campaign of a man who was in the United States Senate for more than three decades before becoming vice president, and whose much-touted middle-class family did not struggle any more than Warren’s family. […]

    Beyond elitism, both Biden and Mayor Pete Buttigieg are working hard to brand Warren as angry—a potentially devastating charge for a woman, since women are not allowed to be angry without being punished for it. According to Buttigieg, who spent the last Democratic debate launching angry attacks on competitors and then concluding those attacks with calls for unity, Warren is “so absorbed in the fighting that it is as though fighting were the purpose.” According to Biden, who once suggested he’d like to physically fight Donald Trump but also believes that, post-Trump, congressional Republicans will have an “epiphany” and clamor to work with Democrats, Warren is part of “an angry unyielding viewpoint that has crept into our politics.”

    JFC.

    The anger attack is particularly interesting because, while Warren refers to herself as a “fighter,” she is campaigning very much in the happy warrior mode […]

    Warren, queen of the selfie line, angry? “Nothing that she is doing seems to be telegraphing that she is angry,” said Barbara Lee Foundation spokeswoman Amanda Hunter. “It seems that those attacks are really coming from somewhere else and are more premeditated and a way to play on her gender rather than a reaction to something that she’s actually doing.” Yeah, exactly. And it’s coming from the campaigns of men who are themselves absolutely willing to trade on anger (socially acceptable in its masculine form) when they think it will get them the least bit of advantage in the primary.

  199. says

    Yahoo – “Whistleblower attorneys fear for client’s safety as Trump allies move to out him”:

    On the evening of Oct. 2, Mark Zaid, one of the attorneys representing the anonymous official whose whistleblower complaint sparked the impeachment probe into President Trump, received an email with the subject line: “a bullet in your head.”

    Zaid reported the email to the FBI, which investigated and determined the threat wasn’t credible, but that message was just one of the dozens received by the whistleblower’s attorneys from individuals ranging from the merely critical to downright threatening.

    On Wednesday morning, a person using the encrypted email service ProtonMail told Zaid to “DIE you piece of FILTH,” and another emailed the legal team repeatedly, in one message saying that Russian President Vladimir Putin “would have already shot scum like this,” referring to the whistleblower. A third told Andrew Bakaj, the whistleblower’s primary lawyer and head of his own law firm Compass Rose Legal Group, that someone would “come up to [him] on the street” when he “least expects it,” hinting at violence.

    Others are less threatening but still critical, like a man going by the name Jeb Stuart, who called in to insist the whistleblower come forward with their complaints publicly.

    A review of a trove of voicemails, emails and messages on social media provided to Yahoo News by the whistleblower’s legal team demonstrate the effects of efforts by Trump allies to vilify the whistleblower and those testifying against the president in the impeachment inquiry. That campaign consists of a blend of talking points promoted by key conservative figures and those originating from Trump or his allies themselves.

    The results, according to the whistleblower’s lawyers, has been a campaign of harassment that makes them fear for their client’s personal safety.

    “My legal career has been spent fighting to uphold First Amendment protections, but sadly, many do not realize that the Constitution does not give them the right to harass or threaten private citizens,” Zaid told Yahoo News. “Regardless of their taunts, it will not deter us from fulfilling our ethical and professional responsibilities to our clients, nor will it intimidate us either.”

    However, the efforts to expose and delegitimize the whistleblower have expanded over the last week beyond everyday citizens to Republican lawmakers, including Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, culminating Wednesday morning when the president’s son, Donald Trump Jr., tweeted a name circulating in right-wing media circles as the whistleblower.

    While not all of the individuals calling in to the lawyers are threatening, most have a common agenda: exposing the whistleblower’s identity….

    Much, much more atl. Frightening.

  200. says

    More than 100 black female activists endorse Warren for president.

    […] “She is a leader with a track record of taking on predatory policies and practices that harm our communities and implementing structural changes that give power back to working people. She is a partner with a deep understanding of how racism and gender discrimination don’t just compound income inequality but are actually central to maintaining the status quo. She is a woman who is willing to learn, open to new ideas, and ready to be held accountable by us and our communities,” the group wrote.

    “We endorse her with the complete recognition that, upon her victory, the work is not over, nor is it just the beginning,” it added. “A Warren victory ensures an environment in which Black community leaders can better and more easily usher in those long-overdue societal transformations that move us closer to the Liberation that we know is possible.” […]

    The group, which identifies itself as a space for “black womxn who are intentionally inclusive of all black folks that do not claim male identity,” said Warren has committed to “rooting out the culture of white supremacy,” hold a policy summit in her first 100 days to hear from working people of color, the disabled, indigenous groups and diverse community leaders and experts, as well as hire a diverse staff for her transition team and administration.

    The letter comes as Warren tries to chew into Biden’s lead among African American voters, a key Democratic constituency. Though Warren still trails the former vice president in the Real Clear Politics polling index, recent surveys have shown her gaining support among the demographic. […]

    Link

  201. says

    Guardian – “Leak from neo-Nazi site could identify hundreds of extremists worldwide”:

    An apparent online leak of materials from influential neo-Nazi website Iron March, which has linked to several murders and acts of extremist terrorism, has the potential to identify hundreds of extremists around the world.

    The material, posted anonymously to an online archiving site on Wednesday, US time, by a user identified only as “antifa-data”. It apparently comprises the contents of the now defunct Iron March website’s underlying database and makes it possible to match usernames with email addresses, IP addresses, forum posts and direct messages.

    Material uncovered in the leak so far suggests some users on the platform registered with existing personal email addresses, including addresses associated with several US universities. Posts and direct messages suggest that some members were on active military service at the time they posted, according to the open source journalism website Bellingcat.

    By Wednesday evening on social media, researchers were claiming to have identified several individual users by means of the leak, including a one-time congressional candidate.

    Iron March was founded in 2011 by a Russian nationalist named Alexander “Slavros” Mukhitdinov, and abruptly closed without explanation in November 2017.

    Members and groups associated with the website were involved in a range of deadly violence after the site’s founding as influential users became more voluble in their support of uncompromising extremism, genocide and insurrectionary terrorism.

    In May 2017, Iron March user and Atomwaffen Division (AWD) member, Devon Arthurs, murdered two roommates – and AWD comrades – in Tampa, Florida. Police found neo-Nazi literature in the house, along with explosives, radioactive materials, and a framed photo of the Oklahoma City bomber, Timothy McVeigh.

    AWD has been tied to at least three other murders, a terror plot and the assault of a protester in Charlottesville.

    Another group with links to Iron March is Vanguard America, the group that supporter James Alex Fields marched with at the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville before he murdered Heather Heyer on 12 August 2017 by driving his car into the protesters.

    According to the Southern Poverty Law Center, Iron March was “affiliated with or offered support to at least nine fascist groups in nine different countries”, including Serbia, Greece, Australia and Ukraine. The chats, too, appear to feature users from a range of different countries.

    The website was also central to the development of “accelerationist” neo-Nazi ideology – which seeks to destabilize and replace liberal democracy by exacerbating its tensions with violence – and aesthetic of so-called Siege culture, which takes in skull masks and violent and racist memes….

  202. says

    From another thread of livetweets of the Stone trial:

    …After Stone sent a letter to the HPSCI, falsely naming Credico as his WikiLeaks intermediary, Stone emailed Credico what he said were portions of that letter. But prosecutors are revealing that Stone dramatically altered the excerpts he sent Credico.

    The excerpt that Stone sent Credico referenced Stone noticing “landmark interviews” Credico conducted with Assange. That was not in the real letter Stone sent the committee.

    The excerpt Stone sent Credico said his claim of a backchannel to Assange was “a bit of salesmanship” for his Infowars audience. That also was not in the real letter Stone sent HPSCI.

    Stone was trying to downplay to Credico the significance of his claim about Credico….

  203. says

    The WaPo report discussed @ #272 has gotten under Trump’s skin. Tweets from the past several hours:

    The story in the Amazon Washington Post, of course picked up by Fake News CNN, saying “President Trump asked for AG Barr to host a news conference clearing him on Ukraine,” is totally untrue and just another FAKE NEWS story with anonymous sources that don’t exist….

    ….The LameStream Media, which is The Enemy of the People, is working overtime with made up stories in order to drive dissension and distrust!

    Bill Barr did not decline my request to talk about Ukraine. The story was a Fake Washington Post con job with an “anonymous” source that doesn’t exist. Just read the Transcript. The Justice Department already ruled that the call was good. We don’t have freedom of the press!

    The degenerate Washington Post MADE UP the story about me asking Bill Barr to hold a news conference. Never happened, and there were no sources!

    The Amazon Washington Post and three lowlife reporters, Matt Zapotosky, Josh Dawsey, and Carol Leonnig, wrote another Fake News story, without any sources (pure fiction), about Bill Barr & myself. We both deny this story, which they knew before they wrote it. A garbage newspaper!

    The Radical Left Dems and LameStream Media are just trying to make it hard for Republicans and me to win in 2020. The new Impeachment Hoax is already turning against them!

  204. says

    “AP Exclusive: Steyer aide offered money for endorsements”:

    A top aide to Democratic presidential candidate Tom Steyer in Iowa has privately offered campaign contributions to local politicians in exchange for endorsing his White House bid, according to multiple people with direct knowledge of the conversations.
    Full Coverage: Election 2020

    The overtures from Pat Murphy, a former state House speaker who is serving as a top adviser on Steyer’s Iowa campaign, aren’t illegal — though payments for endorsements would violate campaign finance laws if not disclosed. There’s no evidence that any Iowans accepted the offer or received contributions from Steyer’s campaign as compensation for their backing.

    But the proposals could revive criticism that the billionaire Steyer is trying to buy his way into the White House. Several state lawmakers and political candidates said they were surprised Steyer’s campaign would think he could buy their support.

    Tom Courtney, a former Democratic state senator from southeastern Iowa who’s running for reelection to his old seat, told The Associated Press the financial offer “left a bad taste in my mouth.”…

    More atl. The only Dem presidential candidacy worse than Steyer’s is Gabbard’s. Both the vanity plate and the autocrats’ choice have made next week’s debate.

  205. says

    NEW: A NY state judge has ordered President Donald Trump to pay $2 million to a collection of non-profit orgs as part of a settlement with the New York state attorney general’s office to resolve a civil lawsuit that alleged ‘persistent’ violations of charities law. Story TK.”

  206. blf says

    Trump deserves to be jeered and mocked wherever he goes:

    […]
    Trump, unlike every other president in modern times, has never held a positive approval rating in a Gallup poll. This alone will make winning a second term inordinately difficult, though not impossible. The black swan victory of 2016 could always repeat itself, in newer and stranger ways.

    […]

    For the millions who feel enraged and despondent over Trump’s ennobling of white supremacists or his insidious environmental and immigration policies, trying to remain an informed citizen can amount to an exercise in psychic torture. It’s not easy reading, every day, about the degradation of whatever democratic norms America has left. Even impeachment, at this point, amounts to little more than a sugar high: House Democrats have the votes, but marshaling 20 Republicans in the Senate to convict Trump, who has thoroughly remade the GOP in his image, will be absurdly hard to do.

    What recourse, then, do citizens have against a deranged, all-powerful executive who can lay waste to the planet many times over? Election Day is still a full year away. In the absence of a vote, all that is left is protest. If it all feels, at times, irrelevant to Trump’s band of Republican nihilists, there is still a necessity to taking action, to demonstrating mass resistance against such hate.

    Booing is its own form of necessary protest. That’s why any pearl-clutching from the pundit class is nonsensical. If Trump is going to wade beyond the safe spaces of a MAGA rally, a branded golf course or the sycophantic White House, he deserves to be reminded of how much he is actually despised. […]

    […]

    Trump’s worldview is childishly Manichean, consumed with TV ratings and crowd sizes. He deserves to be defeated on his own terms, to be jeered and mocked wherever he goes. He deserves to fester with self-doubt, if he is capable of it at all. This will be his punishment, as long as he clings to the presidency.

  207. says

    Politico – “NSC official who attended key Ukraine meetings to leave post”:

    Earl Matthews, a senior National Security Council official who attended several of the meetings now at the center of the congressional impeachment inquiry, will depart from his job on Friday, according to two people familiar with his plans.

    During his time on the NSC, Matthews, the senior director for defense policy and strategy and one of the highest ranking African-American members of the Trump White House, worked closely with former national security advisor John Bolton. He was part of a small group that sat in on meetings with Ukrainian officials that House Democrats are now scrutinizing as they investigate whether President Donald Trump pressured Ukraine to investigate a political rival.

    Matthews traveled with Bolton to Ukraine in August and Poland in September, where he sat in on meetings with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and senior American officials. The meetings included figures like William Taylor, the top U.S. diplomat in Ukraine, and senior NSC Russia expert Tim Morrison, who have been called up to Capitol Hill to testify about whether they believed Trump and his allies were conditioning security aid and other political favors on Ukraine opening politically advantageous investigations.

    During the Poland trip, Matthews was also in a meeting between Zelensky and Vice President Mike Pence, who was filling in for Trump after the president called off his trip to monitor potential hurricane damages in the U.S. [IIRC he was golfing – SC]

    Still, Matthews has not been pulled into the Democrats’ impeachment probe, according to an administration official….

    According to the article, he’s something of a Trumper, so who knows.

  208. blf says

    Pakistan accused of cover-up over fresh polio outbreak:

    […]
    Officials in Pakistan have been accused of covering up an outbreak of the most dangerous strain of polio and planning a covert vaccination programme to contain the disease.

    According to a source in Pakistan’s polio eradication programme and documentation seen by the Guardian, a dozen children have been infected with the P2 strain of polio, which causes paralysis and primarily effects those under five.

    Dr Malik Safi, coordinator of the national emergency operation centre of the Pakistan polio eradication programme, confirmed the P2 outbreak, but would not give any further comment.

    The P2 strain had previously been eliminated from the country. However, the new cases were allegedly kept hidden from the government and from international donors […] under direct instruction from Babar Bin Atta, the prime minister’s focal representative on polio eradication, who was last month forced to resign after he was accused of corruption. […]

    The alleged cases, which have all resulted in paralysis, have been discovered mainly in Diamer district, with one in the capital, Islamabad.

    Under Pakistani law, every new case of polio in the country has to be officially registered with the government, which then alerts international health bodies. “But to hide their negligence and their poor performance, Babar Bin Atta decided not disclose the cases to anyone,” said the source.

    The re-emergence of P2 would not only be a dramatic step back in Pakistan’s fight against the polio, it would also be symptomatic of what those in the programme have described as “terrible mismanagement” under Bin Atta.

    Alongside Afghanistan, Pakistan is one of only two countries in the world that has not entirely eradicated polio. It was a key milestone in 2014, when Pakistan officially declared it had entirely eradicated P2 polio.

    Polio exists in three different strands, P1, P2, and P3, with P2 notorious as the most contagious and most vicious in its impact on those infected.

    According to the source within the programme, the renewed outbreak of the P2 strand came from a mismanagement of vaccines, which carry a live strain of the disease to create immunity.

    After the strand was eliminated from Pakistan five years ago, all P2 vaccines should have been collected from hospitals and clinics and not used. However, it appears a P2 vaccine was administered accidentally and a child became a carrier for the disease. Tests on the new cases allegedly show the children are all carrying a form of the disease that originates in vaccine form.

    “Somewhere, somebody has inaccurately used this vaccine and because of this negligence … this virus was brought back into the environment and our children are again getting infected with P2,” alleged the source.

    The anti-vax nutcases will jump all over that — 12 (probably very young) children are now paralyzed because corruption & misuse of vaccine.

    However, it is understood that, instead of publicly declaring the renewed outbreak and beginning a public vaccination campaign, a “secret” vaccination campaign will begin on Monday in Rawalpindi and surrounding cities in an attempt at containment. It is understood that only senior members of the polio programme are aware of the P2 campaign, with others — even those who will be administering the vaccines — led to believe it is a standard P1 and P3 polio vaccination programme.

    “This P2 outbreak can only be contained if they do a quality vaccination campaign, and how can you do a quality campaign if you are carrying it out in secret, without any awareness or accountability?” said the source.

    “If anything goes wrong and this P2 polio spreads throughout the whole country, who will take responsibility? Will they just keep telling more lies to cover up their mistakes and put more children at risk?”

    […]

  209. says

    NBC – “Democrats demand Syria plan from Trump”:

    Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and other top Democrats are sending a letter to President Donald Trump on Thursday demanding he develop and brief Congress on a plan to stop the Islamic State from returning in Syria now that most of the American forces have been pulled out of the country.

    The letter comes as Trump plans to meet Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan at the White House next week.

    “Given the dynamics in northern Syria following your reckless decision to withdraw troops and permit Turkey’s invasion, and the continued threat posed by ISIS, we ask that you submit to Congress a comprehensive plan for Syria not later than December 6, 2019,” the letter reads.

    “It is clear that ISIS continues, they are not vanquished, they are not over,” Schumer, D-N.Y., told reporters after that briefing. “I believe that the administration has to do more to make sure the existing ISIS prisoners are guarded, to track down those who have escaped, and to have a far more concrete plan on how we deal with ISIS in the future.”

    The Thursday letter asks the Trump administration to report to Congress on the number of known ISIS fighters remaining in Syria and the number of prisoners who were released and are still missing, and to provide a “plan to stabilize areas formerly controlled by ISIS, including efforts to support, develop, and expand local governance structures.”…

  210. says

    Raf Sanchez:

    Kind of a stunning moment. Senior US official basically acknowledges that Trump’s plan to get out of Syria has been thwarted and there is no change in US policy despite what Trump says.

    You can see that reality on the ground. Hundreds of US troops are still inside Syria, including right up on the Turkish border, despite Trump’s withdrawal order.

    SDF says it is resuming anti-ISIL operations alongside US forces in Syria.

    Quote atl. Is there a plan for the Erdoğan visit next week? Like, what’s the US position going in? Are there any prepared statements? Who’s producing them? Who will be in the meetings? Will Trump be left alone with him?

  211. blf says

    Italian Holocaust survivor given police escort after far-right threats:

    Death threats against Liliana Segre have increased since her proposal for an anti-racism commission was passed

    An Italian Holocaust survivor has been assigned a police escort after an escalation of threats from far-right extremists.

    Liliana Segre, a senator for life, receives an average 200 online threats a day, many against her life. Earlier this year, a teacher from the Veneto region wrote on Facebook that Segre would do well in a nice little incinerator.

    The attacks have increased since her proposal to establish a parliamentary commission to combat racism, antisemitism and incitement to hatred was passed by the government last week.

    Animosity towards Segre, 89, was amplified after the far-right parties, the League and Brothers of Italy, as well as Silvio Berlusconi’s Forza Italia, refused to back the proposal, sparking fury from the Vatican and Rome’s Jewish community.

    Renato Saccone, the prefect of Milan, where Segre lives, was moved to act after Forza Nuova, a neo-fascist political party, hung up a banner criticising the anti-fascism movement close to a theatre where the 89-year-old was making a speech on Tuesday.

    […]

  212. says

    NY AG Letitia James:

    BREAKING: We’ve secured a court order forcing President Trump to pay $2M in damages after admitting to illegally using the Trump Foundation to help him intervene in the 2016 presidential election and further his own political interests.

    No one is above the law.

    Link to the judge’s decision here. I think the money now has to go to veterans’ organizations, and that this was the scam first exposed by David Fahrenthold at WaPo.

  213. says

    Unusual. WH press pool was gathered outside Oval Office doors when they were told they no longer have access to a scheduled 2:15 event recognizing the National Day for the Victims of Communism with President Trump.”

  214. blf says

    Many yonks ago there was a plan — which I vaguely recall was briefly implemented — in London (along the Strand and immediate area) to wash the streets and walkways all night to deter / prevent homeless people from sleeping in the area. That has been one of the most absurd methods of dealing with the unfortunate situation I know of — but now there is a new contender for cruelty and absurdity, Las Vegas bans homeless people from sleeping on the street:

    […]
    Las Vegas officials passed a law Wednesday making it illegal for the homeless to sleep on streets when beds are available at established shelters, despite fierce protests labeling the move as a “war on the poor”.

    The measure will apply to the city’s downtown urban core, not the tourist-heavy Las Vegas Strip, which is overseen by a different jurisdiction.

    Mayor Carolyn Goodman, the sponsor of the measure, called it imperfect but necessary to deal with what officials and downtown business owners characterize as a homeless crisis.

    This is flawed but it is a start, the mayor said after noting Las Vegas’ economy relies on its image as an attractive international tourist attraction […]

    […]

    The ninth US circuit court of appeals struck down a similar law from Boise, Idaho, last year, calling it unconstitutional to prosecute people for sleeping in public places when there aren’t enough shelter beds.

    The city attorney, Brad Jerbic, said the Las Vegas law was crafted to withstand a similar legal challenge, with its if beds are available provision.

    Opponents rejected city officials’ assurances that there will be enough shelter space when necessary.

    […]

    “It’s criminalizing the homeless,” the Rev Leonard Jackson, the associate pastor of First African Methodist Episcopal Church in North Las Vegas and director of the regional Faith Organizing Alliance, said during a morning protest outside City Hall.

    About 100 people rallied, chanting, “The war on the poor has got to go,” before taking their protest into the contentious public meeting that lasted more than nine hours.

    “If we can build stadiums, then we can build housing for the homeless,” George Allen, a self-described “working homeless” home-care worker, told the council.

    Allen was referring to a $2bn, 65,000-seat football stadium set to open next year for the relocated Oakland Raiders. Taxpayers are contributing $750m to the project through hotel room taxes.

    […]

    An annual survey taken one night in January counted more than 5,500 people on the streets in Las Vegas and surrounding cities and county property. Officials estimate that more than 14,000 people are homeless in and around Las Vegas at some point during the year.

    The Review-Journal has tallied about 2,000 beds plus an open-air, 24/7 courtyard offered by the city where officials say more than 300 people stay on any given night. It has 220 sleeping mats.

  215. blf says

    Follow-up to @313 (from the Grauniad’s current live States blog):

    Judge orders Trump to pay $2m for misusing charity foundation
    […]
    From a press release from the New York attorney general:

    The award is part of Attorney General James’ lawsuit against the Donald J Trump Foundation and its directors — Mr Trump, Donald Trump Jr, Ivanka Trump, and Eric Trump…

    Chiefly, Mr Trump admits to personally misusing funds at the Trump Foundation, and agrees to restrictions on future charitable service and ongoing reporting to the Office of the Attorney General in the event he creates a new charity. The settlements also include mandatory training requirements for Donald Trump Jr, Ivanka Trump, and Eric Trump. Finally, the settlements name the charities that will receive the remaining assets of the Trump Foundation as part of its dissolution.

    “The Trump Foundation has shut down, funds that were illegally misused are being restored, the president will be subject to ongoing supervision by my office, and the Trump children had to undergo compulsory training to ensure this type of illegal activity never takes place again,” said Attorney General James.

    “The court’s decision, together with the settlements we negotiated, are a major victory in our efforts to protect charitable assets and hold accountable those who would abuse charities for personal gain. My office will continue to fight for accountability because no one is above the law — not a businessman, not a candidate for office, and not even the President of the United States.”

  216. says

    NYT – “U.S. Envoy in Syria Says Not Enough Was Done to Avert Turkish Attack”:

    The top American diplomat on the ground in northern Syria has criticized the Trump administration for not trying harder to prevent Turkey’s military offensive there last month — and said Turkish-backed militia fighters committed “war crimes and ethnic cleansing.”

    In a searing internal memo, the diplomat, William V. Roebuck, raised the question of whether tougher American diplomacy, blunter threats of economic sanctions and increased military patrols could have deterred Turkey from attacking. Similar measures had dissuaded Turkish military action before.

    “It’s a tough call, and the answer is probably not,” Mr. Roebuck wrote in the 3,200-word memo. “But we won’t know because we didn’t try.” He did note several reasons the Turks might not have been deterred: the small American military presence at two border outposts, Turkey’s decades-long standing as a NATO ally and its formidable army massing at the Syrian frontier.

    In an unusually blunt critique, Mr. Roebuck said the political and military turmoil upended the administration’s policy in northern Syria. The administration’s actions left Syrian Kurdish allies abandoned, resulted in ceding territory the Kurds had controlled to Syria, Turkey and Russia, and opened the door for a possible Islamic State resurgence.

    While he described the events as a “sideshow” to the bloody, yearslong upheaval in Syria, he said that “it is a catastrophic sideshow and it is to a significant degree of our making.”

    Mr. Roebuck, a respected 27-year diplomat and former United States ambassador to Bahrain, sent the unclassified memo on Oct. 31 to his boss, James F. Jeffrey, the State Department’s special envoy on Syria policy, and to about four dozen State Department, White House and Pentagon officials who work on Syria issues. Mr. Roebuck is Mr. Jeffrey’s deputy.

    The New York Times obtained a copy of the memo from someone who said it was important to make Mr. Roebuck’s assessment public. Mr. Roebuck declined to comment on Thursday.

    Mr. Roebuck’s memo appears to be the first formal expression of dissent on Syria from a Trump administration official to be made public. Pentagon officials were alarmed by the sudden shift in Syria policy, but top officials never made their views public.

    Mr. Roebuck’s memo also comes as the president already has expressed disdain for some State Department officials because of their testimony in Congress during the impeachment inquiry over Ukraine policy.

    For nearly two years, Mr. Roebuck has worked on the ground in northern Syria with Syrian Kurdish and Arab military and civilian officials who make up what is called the Syrian Democratic Forces. Mr. Roebuck has been an important interlocutor with Mazlum Kobani, the Syrian Kurdish military commander whose fighters have worked closely with American Special Operations forces to combat the Islamic State.

    Mr. Roebuck focused his harshest criticism on Turkey’s military offensive and specifically on Turkey’s deployment of Syrian Arab fighters in its vanguard force. Mr. Roebuck added his voice to accusations by human rights groups that these fighters have killed Kurdish prisoners, including one of them lying on the ground with his hands bound behind his back, and committed other atrocities as they emptied major Kurdish population centers in northern Syria.

    “Turkey’s military operation in northern Syria, spearheaded by armed Islamist groups on its payroll, represents an intentioned-laced effort at ethnic cleansing,” Mr. Roebuck wrote, calling the abuses “what can only be described as war crimes and ethnic cleansing.”

    “One day when the diplomatic history is written,” he said, “people will wonder what happened here and why officials didn’t do more to stop it or at least speak out more forcefully to blame Turkey for its behavior: an unprovoked military operation that has killed some 200 civilians, left well over 100,000 people (and counting) newly displaced and homeless because of its military operation.”

    Mr. Roebuck continued, “To protect our interests, we need to speak out more forcefully, publicly and privately, to reduce the blame placed on the U.S. and to highlight the Turkish responsibilities for civilian well-being.”

    By acting now, Mr. Roebuck wrote, “we have a chance to minimize the damage for us and hopefully correct some of the impact of Turkey’s current policies, as we seek to implement the president’s guidance for our presence in northeastern Syria.”

    As critical as he was about Turkey, Mr. Roebuck praised the Syrian Democratic Forces as a stout and reliable partner that had suffered massive casualties. He said the group had helped defeat the Islamic State and lead American commandos to the hide-out of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the ISIS leader, and had provided reasonably sound local governance as well as a relatively stable security environment.

    It was not a perfect situation, Mr. Roebuck said, but it was working and allowed United States forces to operate there in low numbers and safely at very low cost. “It wasn’t a bad start,” he said.

    He also advocated using what time the United States has left in northeastern Syria to help stabilize the situation for the Kurdish population. Mr. Kobani, the Syrian Kurdish commander, said in a Twitter message on Wednesday that the Syrian Democratic Forces were resuming counterterrorism, or CT, operations as well as helping secure the oil fields, which provide the Kurds badly needed revenue.

    “President Trump has been clear and consistent about wanting to get our forces out of Syria,” Mr. Roebuck concluded. “The residual presence to protect the oil and fight ISIS buys us some time.”

    But he cautioned: “Our diplomacy will also need to recognize we — with our local partners — have lost significant leverage and inherited a shrunken, less stable platform to support both our CT efforts and the mission of finding a comprehensive political solution for Syria.”

  217. says

    Media Matters – “Fox News has aired over 20 hours of Trump’s campaign rallies live in 2019”:

    President Donald Trump held his 17th campaign rally of the year, and his third in the past week, on Wednesday night in Monroe, Louisiana, showing his support for the state’s Republican gubernatorial candidate ahead of next Tuesday’s special election. Throughout 2019, Fox News has regularly preempted its normal prime-time programming to show the president’s rallies, airing almost every one of the events in its entirety and giving over 20 hours of free, uninterrupted airtime to Trump and the Republican politicians he has been stumping for.

    These rallies often feature Trump echoing those very prime-time hosts’ talking points along with other vitriol and lies, such as racist chants against sitting congresswomen from his audience.

    Fox News has aired over 20 hours of Trump’s campaign rallies in 2019, showing nearly 87% of the president’s total rally speaking time throughout the year. Toward the end of 2018, Fox moved to stop showing Trump’s rallies, but the network has reversed this trend in 2019, opting to show nearly all of the president’s speeches at rallies in full. Additionally, Fox Business has aired one hour and 47 minutes of Trump rally coverage throughout the year.

    CNN has aired just under 10 minutes of Trump’s rallies live, and a minute and a half of that time was footage of the president’s response to the April 27 synagogue shooting in Poway, California. The network also aired the first eight minutes of Trump’s rally that officially launched his 2020 campaign (his 60th rally since becoming president). MSNBC has not aired any of Trump’s rallies in 2019.

    Airing Trump rallies live in their entirety acts as a major boost for the Trump campaign, with the advertising value of Fox News’ coverage worth an estimated $45 million according to calculations by media monitoring service iQ media. Fox Business’ coverage equated to nearly $432,000, while CNN’s value was worth nearly $106,000.

    For Fox and the network’s personalities, the rallies are an opportunity to further extol the virtues of Trump and his presidency. Fox’s coverage of Trump’s rallies goes beyond just broadcasting them live. Shows in the lead-up to the rally often tease Trump’s impending speech while showing a small picture of the venue filling up in the bottom of the screen; the network frequently sends reporters to gather reaction from attendees of the rally; and the rallies often lead the network’s news the following morning….

    Good on MSNBC. Unbearably creepy video of Fox people obsequiously praising the rallies atl.

  218. tomh says

    WaPo:
    9:50 p.m.: Whistleblower’s lawyer sends cease-and-desist letter to Trump

    Andrew Bakaj, in a letter to the White House dated Thursday, demanded that President Trump stop calling for the publication of the whistleblower’s identity and alleged that his “reckless and dangerous” comments already had intimidated the whistleblower.

    “Let me be clear: should any harm befall any suspected named whistleblower or their family, the blame will rest squarely with your client,” said the letter, addressed to Pat Cipollone, counsel to the president, and copied to congressional leaders.

    The letter was first published by CNN and confirmed by The Post.

    Trump and his allies have attacked the whistleblower and argued the person does not deserve anonymity. Republicans want to bring the whistleblower in to testify in the public hearings. Democrats say his testimony doesn’t matter because his complaint has been corroborated by several witnesses.

    — Craig Timberg

  219. says

    Some news outlets have received excerpts of the book A Warning, by an anonymous senior Trump administration official (the same one who wrote the NYT oped last year). I think WaPo might have the whole book. (Is it McGahn?)

    Maddow last night:

    “Exclusive: Anonymous Author Depicts Deep Trump Admin Dysfunction”: “Rachel Maddow shares exclusively obtained quotes and excerpts from the forthcoming book ‘A Warning’ by an anonymous author described as ‘a senior official in the Trump administration’, who depicts dark dysfunction in the White House.”

    “Book: Trump Recklessness Sparked W.H. ‘Five-Alarm Fire Drills'”: “Rachel Maddow shares some of the first excerpts from the forthcoming book ‘A Warning’ by an anonymous author described as ‘a senior official in the Trump administration’, describing the challenge of briefing Donald Trump in pictures and sound bites and the staff panic of trying to prevent from Trump’s ill-considered decisions.”

  220. says

    Jeff Sessions has announced his run for his old Senate seat, kicking off his campaign with some video groveling.

    The House subpoenaed Mick Mulvaney last night to be deposed this morning, in about 10 minutes. He’s not showing.

    NBC – “Referee says he told Rep. Jim Jordan that Ohio State doctor performed sex act in shower”:

    A professional referee says in a lawsuit filed Thursday that disgraced doctor Richard Strauss masturbated in front of him in a shower after a wrestling match at Ohio State University, and he reported the encounter directly to Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, who was then the assistant coach.

    “Yeah, that’s Strauss,” Jordan and then-head coach Russ Hellickson replied, according to the lawsuit, when the referee, identified in court papers as John Doe 42, told them about the incident. The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Ohio, implies that Jordan’s response to the incident, which the referee said happened in 1994, was essentially a shrug.

    John Doe 42 is the second person to say he told Jordan directly about either being approached or molested by Strauss, who was found by independent investigators to have sexually abused 177 male students over two decades.

    Jordan, a powerful Republican congressman and a top defender of President Donald Trump in the ongoing impeachment inquiry, has repeatedly denied knowing anything about what Strauss did to the wrestlers he helped coach from 1986 to 1994. He has said the allegations against him were politically motivated.

    John Doe 42 said that when he informed Jordan and Hellickson about what happened, their response was, “Yeah, yeah, we know.”

    “It was common knowledge what Strauss was doing so the attitude was it is what it is,” he told NBC News. “I wish Jim, and Russ, too, would stand up and do the right thing and admit they knew what Strauss was doing, because everybody knew what he was doing to the wrestlers. What was a shock to me is that Strauss tried to do that to me. He was breaking new ground by going after a ref.”

    Former Ohio State wrestler Dunyasha Yetts was the first person to say he spoke to Jordan directly about Strauss. He previously described how he went to see Strauss for a thumb injury, and when the doctor tried to pull down his pants, he stormed out and complained to Jordan and Hellickson.

    “It’s good that people are starting to come forward and say the truth, which is that Jordan and the other coaches knew what was going on and they blew it off,” Yetts told NBC News.

    Other former Ohio State wrestlers have said Jordan had to know about Strauss because he shared a locker room with them and took part in discussions about the doctor, who died in 2005.

    The lawsuit was filed by 43 survivors against Ohio State, claiming the university’s “ingrained culture of institutional indifference” enabled Strauss to sexually abuse former students and athletes from a half-dozen other sports….

  221. says

    Thank you, Just Security!

    “Public Document Clearinghouse: Ukraine Impeachment Inquiry”:

    Just Security has compiled and curated all publicly available documents in Congress’s impeachment inquiry concerning President Donald Trump in connection with Ukraine. This collection seeks to include significant original source material, including relevant legislation, letters, subpoenas, deposition transcripts, hearing transcripts, executive branch communications, and litigation documents….

    “A Who’s Who of Ukraine Witnesses”:

    …Below is a list of the witnesses who have either testified or have been requested to testify by the congressional committees leading the investigation. Each profile contains relevant background but focuses mostly on what we know so far about their testimony, through transcripts, their opening statements and media reports. The list includes the whistleblower, without whom we might not have learned about any of this….

    Super helpful.

  222. says

    NEWS: House committees are expected to release the transcript of former White House official Fiona Hill’s deposition today, two sources tell @JoshNBCNews. One source says that Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman’s transcript is also expected to be released today.”

  223. says

    Guardian – “Secret chats involving Republican lawmaker reveal fresh evidence of plots and paranoia”:

    Leaked Signal messages from an online chat network around six-term Washington state Republican representative Matt Shea show new evidence of violent fantasies, surveillance of perceived adversaries, conspiracy thinking, Islamophobia, and support for white nationalists.

    The messages from the chat group, exchanged between October 2017 and October 2018, show Shea’s network includes other serving, former and aspiring rightwing politicians from Idaho and Washington, alongside activists associated with militia groups, anti-environmental causes, and pro-gun activism.

    They also show participants, including Shea, preparing for economic and societal collapse even as they campaign for the secession of eastern Washington from the remainder of the state.

    The messages provide a rare insight into the inner workings – and paranoia – of the so-called patriot movement, whose members have participated in standoffs with the federal government in Nevada and Oregon, and whose far-right beliefs have been controversially promoted by Shea.

    Lindsay Schubiner, a program director at the progressive Western States Center, said of the chats: “The chat messages reveal Shea acting more like a militia leader than an elected official. His conspiratorial and violent mindset are on full display. If it was not already clear, Shea has demonstrated that he is unfit for public office. Now it’s time for his colleagues in the Washington house of representatives to hold him accountable.”

    Shea remains under investigation by the Rampart Group, which was hired by the clerk of the Washington state house to “assess the level of threat of political violence posed by these individuals and groups” associated with Shea, following reporting in the Guardian and local outlets about secret chats and documents produced by Shea’s network. They are due to present their report on 1 December.

    Much, much more atl. The “G2” part is perfect.

  224. blf says

    Trump campaign competition to dine with president condemned as a ‘fraud’:

    Doubt cast on whether fundraising contests produce real winners, fueling speculation Trump is swindling the public again

    A series of contests for donors to Donald Trump’s election campaign to win a prize of sharing breakfast, lunch or dinner with the US president [sic] have been condemned as a “fraud”.

    Media reports this week have cast doubt on whether the competitions produce real winners, fueling speculation that Trump, accused of swindling the public in past ventures such as Trump University, is at it again.

    Richard Painter, a former White House chief ethics lawyer, spoke out amid deepening questions over the fundraising lotteries that, so far, the Trump campaign has been unable to answer.

    “I’ve received dozens of these fundraising emails,” said Painter, who was George W Bush’s ethics counsel for two years. “If they have lunch or dinner, then it’s OK. If not, then it’s fraud. I’ve seen no proof that they actually happen.”

    The issue was first raised by the Popular Information […]. It scrutinized at least 15 contests the Trump campaign has run since last year offering the chance to win breakfast, lunch or dinner with the president [sic].

    “Supporters are enticed to donate to Trump’s campaign with promises of free travel, accommodations, and an ‘epic’ meal with Trump at various locations across the country,” the site said. “An investigation by Popular Information, however, did not uncover evidence that anyone has ever actually won.”

    […]

    The Trump campaign[…] rejects the allegation that it is operating a scam. Erin Perrine, the principal deputy communications director, told the Guardian in an email: We have a winner for every contest. Any reporting otherwise is wrong.

    As supposed proof, Perrine sent a link to a Washington Post article from October 2017 that showed a photo of donor Chris Chavez and his father, Tracy Chavez, meeting Trump at a rally in Phoenix, Arizona. But Chavez had entered a different type of competition which did not involve a meal.

    […]

    The Trump campaign’s communications director, Tim Murtaugh […] and Perrine then tweeted links to an article by the rightwing Daily Caller website, which purported to debunk the “conspiracy theory”. On closer inspection, it did no such thing. The article contained interviews with two “winners” […] who never had a meal with the president.

    [… T]he campaign has been unable to supply [a photo of the president sharing a meal with a supporter], leaving some to ponder whether Trump is less enamored of the so-called “deplorables” who support his campaigns than he makes out.

  225. says

    AP – “Twitter accounts push propaganda photos of Turkish soldiers”:

    As Turkish forces invaded northern Syria in early October, supporters of the offensive launched a different kind of campaign — online.

    Dozens of images claiming to show Turkey’s soldiers cuddling babies, feeding hungry toddlers and carrying elderly women spread across Twitter and Instagram where they were liked, retweeted and viewed thousands of times thanks also to popular hashtags.

    Except some of the photos weren’t of Turkish soldiers. None of them were recent and some had been taken in parts of Syria unconnected to the invasion – even in other parts of the world.

    The online campaign follows a pattern of social media propaganda that seeks to sway global opinion when controversial, international events erupt. In August, for instance, Twitter announced it had suspended more than 200,000 accounts thought to be run by Beijing to peddle propaganda targeting the pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong. YouTube soon followed, disabling more than 200 videos believed to be part of a coordinated, misinformation attack on the demonstrations.

    In last month’s instance, the images began making the rounds in the days after President Donald Trump’s widely criticized withdrawal of U.S. troops opened the way for the Turkish offensive against the Kurds on the border with northeastern Syria.

    “That is not the norm of normal behavior on Twitter,” said Gideon Blocq, the CEO of VineSight, a technology company that tracks misinformation online and reviewed the pro-Turkey tweets at The Associated Press’ request. Their analysis examined the frequency of the tweets, use of stock photos and locations of six Twitter accounts that promoted the images and their followers, among other things, all traits that signal inauthentic behavior.

    “One can conclude that these automated accounts are there to push content,” Blocq said.

    Turkey itself, which as of last week had detained 452 people for social media posts critical of the northern Syria, has also put out a tightly controlled narrative on Twitter.

    Asked about the photos and hashtags used to spread the images, Twitter spokeswoman Liz Kelley told the AP the tech company has not seen any evidence of coordinated campaigns to share false information about the Turkish offensive on its site.

    But VineSight’s independent analysis of several accounts that promoted these and other misleading pro-Turkey photos on Twitter in the invasion’s early days not only found signs of automation, but also noted that an overwhelming majority of the accounts’ followers listed locations in Pakistan.

    While it’s impossible to determine who is behind the accounts using only the publicly available information on profiles, VineSight’s findings suggest they are part of an automated network promoting certain hashtags, images and tweets.

    “It’s extremely difficult to build up such a network — it takes some time and manual work,” said Yoel Grinshpon, vice president of research for VineSight. “I would guess it’s somebody who has resources.”

    Of all of the state-backed trolls I’ve seen on Twitter, the Turkish ones are the worst – threatening, mocking, cheering on genocide. They appear right alongside this sort of propaganda, as though there’s no contradiction.

  226. blf says

    From the Grauniad’s current live States blog:

    Trump considers attending Russian military parade

    The president [sic] just told pool reporters on the White House lawn that Russian president Vladimir Putin invited him to the Russian military parade in May and he is considering attending.

    […]

    Robert Mueller said in public remarks that his investigation established that the “Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome.” It’s no wonder Putin invited him to the parade…

  227. says

    Followup to tomh @325.

    And Trump just performed the same “identify the whistleblower” schtick on the White House lawn today!. Trump repeated that the whistleblower’s identity should be revealed because he told a false story. (Not true. The whistleblower’s statement has been corroborated by multiple witnesses.) Trump’s having claimed the whistleblower’s report was false is still no reason to identify, or to threaten him or her. The whistleblower’s lawyers may have to file suit against Trump.

  228. says

    SC @336, I see that various trolls and bots are posting text and images that mock Democrats for being upset that the whistleblower’s identity is at risk of being exposed. The general tenor of those postings is that anything that causes liberals to tear their hair and run around is a good thing.

    There’s no hint of understanding the seriousness of the situation, and no hint of concern for people being threatened with physical violence. No ethical standards are in evidence. It’s like a braying mob that has been brainwashed.

  229. says

    JCWI:

    The names of the 39 people who died in the back of a lorry in Essex a few weeks ago have been released. 39 people who were loved and will be missed by family and friends. They are more than a number. We remember them here:

    Pham Thi Tra My, aged 26
    Nguyen Dinh Lurong, aged 20
    Nguyen Huy Phong, aged 35
    Vo Nhan Du, aged 19
    Tran Manh Hung, aged 37
    Tran Khanh Tho, aged 18
    Vo Van Linh, aged 25
    Nguyen Van Nhan, aged 33
    Bui Phan Thang, aged 37
    Nguyen Huy Hung, aged 15
    Tran Thi Tho, aged 21
    Bui Thi Nhung, aged 19
    Vo Ngoc Nam, aged 28
    Nguyen Dinh Tu, aged 26
    Le Van Ha, aged 30
    Tran Thi Ngoc, aged 19
    Nguyen Van Hung, aged 33
    Hoang Van Tiep, aged 18
    Cao Tien Dung, aged 37
    Cao Huy Thanh, aged 33
    Tran Thi Mai Nhung, aged 18
    Nguyen Minh Quang, aged 20
    Le Trong Thanh, aged 44
    Pham Thi Ngoc Oanh, aged 28
    Hoang Van Hoi, aged 24
    Nguyen Tho Tuan, aged 25
    Dang Huu Tuyen, aged 22
    Nguyen Trong Thai, aged 26
    Nguyen Van Hiep, aged 24
    Nguyen Thi Van, aged 35
    Tran Hai Loc, aged 35
    Duong Minh Tuan, aged 27
    Nguyen Ngoc Ha, aged 32
    Nguyen Tien Dung, aged 33
    Phan Thi Thanh, aged 41
    Nguyen Ba Vu Hung, aged 34
    Dinh Dinh Thai Quyen, aged 18
    Tran Ngoc Hieu, aged 17
    Dinh Dinh Binh, aged 15

  230. says

    Followup to comment 347.

    Commentary from Steve Benen:

    […] Ward’s [Kelli Ward, the chair of the Arizona Republican Party] argument is part of a much larger mosaic. There are reports out of Kentucky, for example, exploring whether and how Matt Bevin (R) can remain as governor, despite receiving fewer votes. This comes on the heels of Republican lawmakers in several states balking at voter-approved ballot measures the GOP didn’t like.

    That came on the heels of truly ridiculous Republican power-grabs in states like Wisconsin, Michigan, and North Carolina, where voters had the audacity to support Democratic gubernatorial candidates.

    That came on the heels of GOP officials in several states imposing heavily gerrymandered maps on the electorate after the 2010 midterms.

    In too many instances, the party’s hostility toward democracy is overt. It’s unapologetic. It’s practically daring people to care. […]

    From the Arizona Republic newspaper:

    Republicans, take heart. Arizona state GOP Chairwoman Kelli Ward has a truly genius idea for the party’s next move in light of this week’s election losses in three states.

    While some Republicans are warning that the results in Virginia, Pennsylvania and Kentucky should serve as a wake-up call, Ward has a different vision for how to stop the bleeding.

    It’s simple, really: just cut back on democracy.

    From CNN:

    The problem with Ward’s argument is, well, it’s dumb. Very dumb.

    Link

  231. says

    From Alex Ward:

    […] Trump was clear about who that oil would belong to: “We’re keeping the oil — remember that,” he told a gathering of Chicago police officers in late October. “I’ve always said that: ‘Keep the oil.’ We want to keep the oil. Forty-five million dollars a month? Keep the oil.”

    Unfortunately for Trump, it seems the US military isn’t so keen on that idea — perhaps because stealing Syria’s oil could constitute a war crime. On Thursday, the Pentagon’s top spokesperson told reporters in no uncertain terms that the US would not be keeping any of the revenue from those oil fields.

    “The revenue from this is not going to the US. This is going to the SDF,” Pentagon spokesperson Jonathan Hoffman said, using an acronym for the Kurdish-led, US-allied Syrian Democratic Forces.

    I checked with others in the government to ensure that was actually the policy. Turns out that it is. “The SDF is the sole beneficiary of the sale of the oil from the facilities they control,” a senior administration official told me. […]

    From earlier Trump statements:

    […] the United States “should be able to take some,” adding, “What I intend to do, perhaps, is make a deal with an ExxonMobil or one of our great companies to go in there and do it properly.”

    This sounds remarkably like many of the situations described in the new book, “A Warning.” We can’t tell if Trump is lying, if he believes what he says, if he is defying his advisors (and the law), or if he is simply incapable of understanding what his advisors tell him. Trump is at the mercy of his own ill-informed impulses. Yes, he is dangerous.

  232. says

    Anand Giridharadas:

    We are living in the dregs of an age of capital.

    There is a contest to decide what follows it: an age of reform, or an age of blood-and-soil nationalism.

    The plutocrats shouting and running to prevent the age of reform are hastening the blood-and-soil path.

    Don’t do this.

  233. says

    Followup to SC’s comment 327.

    About Jeff Session’s groveling, pathetic Senate campaign kickoff video:

    […] Jeff Sessions released his campaign kickoff video and it is quite telling. Instead of outlining his plans for Alabama or promoting all the great things he hopes to accomplish in the Senate that he failed to do in the first 20 years of his time in the U.S. Senate, he spent the entire video kissing Trump’s ass.

    No joke, the only thing that would’ve made this video more pathetic would have been if Jeff Sessions were pitching Trump-backed reverse mortgages. […]

    [T]hat was Jeff Sessions mentioning Donald Trump five times and mentioning Alabama one time. He’s doing what everyone else knows is the key to success with Donald Trump—kissing the narcissistic ring. With Donald Trump, flattery will get you everywhere. As long as Sessions keeps kissing ass and both see a path to maintaining power, they will find a way to mend fences. Bet on it.

    UPDATE: At almost the exact moment this article was published, this came across the ol’ Twitter wire. […]
    “Speaking to reporters at the White House, Trump noted Sessions’ campaign video released Thursday evening, saying it said nice things about him.”

    Link

  234. says

    Oh, FFS!

    Donald Trump Jr. has a new book out called Triggered: How the Left Thrives on Hate and Wants to Silence Us. The world’s most disappointing son manicured his beard and took a photo. He also had a ghost writer string together a slew of his thoughts on things. Like his father, Trump Jr. is unable to reflect upon anything without determining that the world is out to get him and that he and his clan of rich corrupt friends are being persecuted. […]

    Most of this crybaby whining from Junior mirrors what we have come to expect from any conservative pundit or politician. It’s “political correctness,” it’s non-binary gender roles, it’s everybody else that’s ruining America and not the people that have controlled and been scamming Americans for the past five decades. However, as with most of these kinds of conservative victim-porn tomes, there are moments that stand out for their egomania. One such moment is when Junior, evoking what I imagine he believes to be a reflective tone, talks about visiting Arlington National Cemetery a day before Donald Trump’s inauguration.

    I rarely get emotional, if ever. I guess you’d call me hyper-rational, stoic. Yet as we drove past the rows of white grave markers, in the gravity of the moment, I had a deep sense of the importance of the presidency and a love of our country … In that moment, I also thought of all the attacks we’d already suffered as a family, and about all the sacrifices we’d have to make to help my father succeed — voluntarily giving up a huge chunk of our business and all international deals to avoid the appearance that we were “profiting off of the office.”

    Forget the fact that Ivanka and Junior and the whole Trump operation have indeed benefited more than ever before from their namesake’s corrupt regime: The breathtaking narcissism involved in comparing the “sacrifices” made by American war veterans and their families to a mob of untalented, barely coherent spoiled brats is truly vulgar. Maybe Junior was thinking about “sacrificing” $2 million in a settlement over he and his family’s fake charity?

    Link

    A ghost writer. Of course Junior used a ghost writer. And of course Junior sees himself as a victim.

    Of course he compares his family’s sacrifices to people buried in Arlington Cemetery.

  235. says

    Throw them all under the bus!

    House Republicans have noticeably shifted their messaging in recent days to attempt to shield President Trump from a swelling body of evidence against him by subtly suggesting that key deputies involved in the Ukraine saga may have acted on their own.

    And Trump is clearly ripping a page from their playbook.

    According to the Washington Post, the new effort is focused on U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland, Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani and possibly acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney. The end game is to raise questions about whether the three acted on their own to mount the Ukraine pressure campaign in order to save face for Trump, whom congressional investigators clearly believe was squarely behind the push to get Ukraine to probe his political rivals.

    Republicans reportedly believe that if they can publicly question these key figures’ motivations enough, it might lessen the damage of the damning testimony from current and former White House and State Department officials that’s emerged in recent days. […]

    Republicans are rallying behind the idea of throwing Sondland under the bus, despite his record of financial and political support for Trump. Earlier this week, House Oversight Committee member Jim Jordan […] told reporters that Sondland’s quid pro quo confirmation was just a “presumption” the top diplomat reached on his own. […]

    Trump has latched onto the shadow denigration campaign. He’s not disparaged Giuliani or Mulvaney (yet), but he notably scorned the whole swath of officials who have provided House investigators with testimony.

    […] Trump claimed the House members conducting the impeachment inquiry had dialed in the “10 people that hate President Trump the most” and “put them up there” for testimony. […]

    Link

  236. says

    Trump being Trump. The stock market will not know which way to turn.

    […] Trump said Friday he hasn’t decided to lift or reduce any tariffs on Chinese goods, one day after a Chinese government spokesperson said the two sides were in agreement on that.

    “Well, they would like to have a rollback. I haven’t agreed to anything,” Trump told reporters on the White House lawn. “China would like to get somewhat of a rollback. Not a complete rollback because they know I won’t do it.” […]

    “They want to make a deal. Frankly, they want to make a deal a lot more than I do,” he said. “I’m very happy right now. We’re taking in billions of dollars” in tariff payments.

    […] There also has been internal disagreements in the administration against going easy on China.

    The White House made a conscious decision not to push back on any of the stories coming out of Beijing because they view the Chinese comments as generally positive and favorable, the person said, adding that Trump wants the deal done later this month.

    On Thursday, a Chinese Commerce Ministry spokesperson said the two sides had agreed in principle on a rollback in tariffs as part of a “phase one” deal […]

    Link

  237. says

    A discussion about the effect that Democratic control of the Virginia legislature might have on the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA):

    […] 37 states have ratified the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA), which provides that “equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.” It takes 38 states to reach the three-fourths threshold necessary to add the ERA to the Constitution — and Virginia is one of the states that has not yet voted to ratify.

    The fight to ratify the ERA, which was proposed by Congress in 1972, is a bitter lesson in just how hard it is to amend the United States Constitution. Though the amendment was quickly approved by 35 states, its momentum stalled after opponents scared conservatives with warnings that it would lead to things like unisex bathrooms and same-sex marriage. After the 35th state (Indiana) voted to ratify in 1977, no other state joined on until 2017 when Nevada took it up.

    Yet, if Virginia’s new Democratic majority does ratify the ERA after the new lawmakers take their seats this January, there is a world of uncertainty about what happens next.

    For one thing, Congress imposed a deadline on the states to ratify the ERA, and that deadline expired in 1982. It’s not at all clear, however, that this deadline is legally binding. […]

    there are also very good reasons why Virginia Democrats may want to give it a shot despite this uncertainty.

    Should the ERA become part of the Constitution, the immediate impact would be fairly minor. The ERA would marginally expand the Constitution’s protections against gender discrimination, but those protections are already quite robust. That’s because of a pioneering legal strategy, spearheaded by future Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in the 1970s, which convinced the Supreme Court that the Constitution already provides most of the benefits women would enjoy under the ERA.

    […] it is unclear whether Ginsburg’s legacy is durable. There are five justices on the Supreme Court right now who believe that the constitutional cases protecting against gender discrimination may not have been correctly decided. If Trump gets to fill more seats on the Supreme Court, those decisions that expanded protections for women will grow even more endangered.

    The strongest case for ratifying the ERA, in other words, is not that it will revolutionize American law now. Rather, it’s that it will insulate many existing protections against gender discrimination from an increasingly conservative Supreme Court in the coming years.

    That is, of course, assuming that ratifying the ERA is still possible. […]

    Link

    More at the link.

  238. johnson catman says

    re Lynna @352: Junior:

    I guess you’d call me hyper-rational, stoic.

    No, I would definitely NOT call you that. And I doubt that you would find many people who would.

  239. says

    From Wonkette: “‘Anonymous’ Says Trump More Bugf*cking Dumbstupid Than You Ever Knew […]”

    […] Skepticism is probably the order of the day, not necessarily of the message, but of the heroism of this person who supposedly is fightin’ the good fight, while yet unwilling to say who they are. Their counterpoint, of course, is that by remaining Thoroughly Anonymous Millie, Trump has no one to attack, and is forced to contend with the message of the book, which is more dire than the message of last year’s op-ed. […]

    The excerpts themselves are interesting, though.

    […] Ever heard that Donald Trump is an impetuous loser moron who is incapable of paying attention to briefings, of absorbing information, […] If so, congratulations! You have watched the news at least one day in the past three years!

    But the “warning” in A Warning gives some more detail on that kind of stuff, and argues that by hook or by crook, Donald Trump needs to be ejected from the damn White House ASAP, as he is not fit to be the president of this nation or any other. Suffice to say, it doesn’t have the don’t worry, there are grown-ups present tone of last year’s column, but rather speaks of the “toxic combination of amorality and indifference” that undergirds the entire Trump presidency, which has completely come off the rails at this point. […]

    OK LET’S GET TO THE DIRT, ALREADY!

    Here’s a lovely metaphor from the book, as excerpted by the Washington Post: Donald Trump as president is “like a twelve-year-old in an air traffic control tower, pushing the buttons of government indiscriminately, indifferent to the planes skidding across the runway and the flights frantically diverting away from the airport.” […]

    Also he is not only too stupid for big words in briefings, or being focused on one point, sometimes he is also bad at pictures. Yes, the pop-up president sometimes lacks the ability to look at pictures very goodly […]

    On the other hand, when Trump really likes a picture […] LOOKIT PICTURE WHITE HOUSE MADE FOR TRUMP! WE SHOULD TWEET PRETTY PICTURE! […]

    You are about to discuss weighty matters, sometimes life-and-death matters, with the leader of the free world. A moment of utmost sobriety and purpose. The process does not unfold that way in the Trump administration. […] Early on, briefers were told not to send lengthy documents. Trump wouldn’t read them. Nor should they bring summaries to the Oval Office. If they must bring paper, then PowerPoint was preferred because he is a visual learner. […]

    The officials were told that PowerPoint decks needed to be slimmed down. The president couldn’t digest too many slides. He needed more images to keep his interest — and fewer words. Then they were told to cut back the overall message (on complicated issues such as military readiness or the federal budget) to just three main points. Eh, that was still too much. […]

    Forget the three points. Come in with one main point and repeat it — over and over again, even if the president inevitably goes off on tangents — until he gets it. Just keep steering the subject back to it. ONE point. Just that one point.

    Because you cannot focus the commander-in-chief’s attention on more than one goddamned thing over the course of a meeting, okay? […]

    “What the fuck is this?” the president would shout, looking at a document one of them handed him. “These are just words. A bunch of words. It doesn’t mean anything.”

    Words do look pretty meaningless to people who cannot actually read. We are just saying. […]

    “I am not qualified to diagnose the president’s mental acuity,” the author writes. “All I can tell you is that normal people who spend any time with Donald Trump are uncomfortable by what they witness. He stumbles, slurs, gets confused, is easily irritated, and has trouble synthesizing information, not occasionally but with regularity. Those who would claim otherwise are lying to themselves or to the country.”

    […]

  240. says

    johnson catman @356, Junior didn’t call himself a “stable genius” because his father already took that one. “Hyper-rational,” LOL. “Stoic,” my ass.

  241. says

    Reuters – “Kurds tell EU: Get tough with Turkey or face Islamic State fighters”:

    …Ilham Ahmed, a Kurdish political leader and co-chair of the Syrian Democratic Council (SDC) executive, said in an interview that the EU should get tough with Turkey or it would soon face a wave of Islamic State militants arriving in Europe.

    “The threat is very big due to the arbitrary way in which the United States has withdrawn. This has allowed many (Islamic State) members to escape and they will make their way back to their countries to continue their terrorist activities.”

    “This poses a big threat to Britain and to Europe in general,” Ahmed added.

    She called on Europe to send 2,000 troops to secure the Syrian-Turkish border and prevent fighters crossing, and to cease all arms sales to Turkey. “Our people are being killed by European weapons,” she said.

    Ahmed also said the West should investigate Turkey’s alleged use of chemical weapons against the Kurds. She called on Europe to ensure Ankara was held responsible for what she said were Turkish war crimes during its offensive.

    “EU-candidate Turkey is not the same Turkey you think you know – it is now a radical Islamist state and you, Europe, should understand that,” Ahmed said, adding that the EU should cut off accession talks with Turkey and scrap any trade deals.

    “Turkey needs to be afraid and it is not right now,” Ahmed said, adding that top level IS militants had found refuge in Turkish-controlled areas of northern Syria….

    Ahmed will be speaking at LSE next Tuesday (the 12th).

  242. says

    FIONA HILL: ‘[H]e told me, and this is a direct quote from Ambassador Bolton: You go and tell [John] Eisenberg that I am not part of whatever drug deal Sondland and Mulvaney are cooking up on this, and you go and tell him what you’ve heard and what I’ve said’.”

  243. tomh says

    NYT Editorial:
    The Billionaires Are Getting Nervous
    Bill Gates and others warn that higher taxes would lead to lower growth. They have their facts backward.
    By The Editorial Board
    Nov. 8, 2019

    When Bill Gates founded Microsoft in 1975, the top marginal tax rate on personal income was 70 percent, tax rates on capital gains and corporate income were significantly higher than at present, and the estate tax was a much more formidable levy. None of that dissuaded Mr. Gates from pouring himself into his business, nor discouraged his investors from pouring in their money.

    Yet he is now the latest affluent American to warn that Senator Elizabeth Warren’s plan for much higher taxes on the rich would be bad not just for the wealthy but for the rest of America, too.

    Mr. Gates, the co-founder of Microsoft, suggested on Wednesday that a big tax increase would result in less economic growth. “I do think if you tax too much you do risk the capital formation, innovation, U.S. as the desirable place to do innovative companies — I do think you risk that,” he said.

    Other perturbed plutocrats have made the same point with less finesse. The billionaire investor Leon Cooperman was downright crude when he declared that Ms. Warren was wrecking the American Dream. Jamie Dimon, the chief executive of JPMorgan Chase, complained on CNBC that Warren “uses some pretty harsh words” about the rich. He added, “Some would say vilifies successful people.”

    Let’s get a few things straight.

    The wealthiest Americans are paying a much smaller share of income in taxes than they did a half-century ago. In 1961, Americans with the highest incomes paid an average of 51.5 percent of that income in federal, state and local taxes. Half a century later, in 2011, Americans with the highest incomes paid just 33.2 percent of their income in taxes, according to a study by Thomas Piketty, Emmanuel Saez and Gabriel Zucman published last year. Data for the last few years is not yet available but would likely show a relatively similar tax burden.

    The federal government needs a lot more money. Decades of episodic tax cuts have left the government deeply in debt: The Treasury is on pace to borrow more than $1 trillion during the current fiscal year to meet its obligations. The government will need still more money for critical investments in infrastructure, education and the social safety net.

    This is not an endorsement of the particulars of Ms. Warren’s tax plan. There is plenty of room to debate how much money the government needs, and how best to raise that money. The specific proposals by Ms. Warren and one of her rivals, Senator Bernie Sanders, to impose a new federal tax on wealth are innovations that require careful consideration.

    But a necessary part of the solution is to collect more from those Americans who have the most.

    And there is little evidence to justify Mr. Gates’s concern that tax increases of the magnitude proposed by Ms. Warren and other candidates for the Democratic presidential nomination would meaningfully discourage innovation, investment or economic growth.

    The available evidence strongly suggests that taxation exerts a minor influence on innovation. Experts have an imperfect understanding of what drives innovation, but taxation isn’t in the same weight class as factors including education, research and a consistent legal system.

    Congress has slashed taxation three times in the past four decades, each time for the stated purpose of spurring innovation and investment and growth. Each time, the purported benefits failed to materialize. President Trump initiated the most recent experiment in 2017. The International Monetary Fund concluded in a recent report that it had not worked.

    Moreover, while higher tax rates may weigh modestly against innovation and investment, that calculus is incomplete. It ignores the question of what the government does with the additional money. It also ignores the possibility that higher taxes could result in more innovation.

    A study of American patent holders found that innovators tend to come from wealthy families, to grow up in communities of innovators, and to receive high-quality educations in math and science. Mr. Gates, one of the most successful entrepreneurs in American history, fits the profile: He grew up in an affluent family and received the best education money could buy.

    The implication of that study, and related research, is that public investment, funded by taxation, could give more kids the kinds of advantages enjoyed by the young Mr. Gates.

    There is no doubt that it is theoretically possible to raise taxes to prohibitive heights: If a person had to pay 100 percent of the next dollar they earned, they would be likely to call it a day.

    But the alarm bells are out of all proportion with Ms. Warren’s plan. Describing his concerns on Wednesday, Mr. Gates at one point suggested he might be asked to pay $100 billion.

    The Warren campaign calculates that under Ms. Warren’s plan, Mr. Gates would owe $6.379 billion in taxes next year. Notably, that is less than Mr. Gates earned from his investments last year. Even under Ms. Warren’s plan, there’s a good chance Mr. Gates would get richer.

    To his credit, Mr. Gates has said that he thinks the wealthy should pay higher taxes. But that’s not how he behaved on Wednesday. He can demonstrate that he’s serious about tax hikes by setting aside the hyperbole and engaging in principled and factual debate about the details.

  244. says

    Mehdi Hasan:

    “I don’t remember seeing you or any other member of the Polish government marching in Christchurch… in solidarity with the Muslim victims.” – me on @ajupfront to right-wing Polish MP Dominik Tarczynski after he said imams don’t condemn terrorist attacks:…

    “Why didn’t you, according to your own logic, go to Christchurch and disown him? Say this has nothing to do with us, nothing to do with Poland or Christianity? That’s what you expect of Muslims, why didn’t you do that in New Zealand?” – me on @AJUpFront

    Videos atl. “There are no hate preachers in Christian churches,” the guy exclaims with a straight face.

  245. says

    From the Hill transcript (p. 345):

    No. No. It’s totally fine. I’m just trying to basically say here that I have very you know, obviously strong feelings about our national security. And I just want to, if I’ve done anything, leave a message to you that we should all be greatly concerned about what the Russians intend to do in 2020. And any information that they can provide, you know, that basically deflects our attention away from what they did and what they’re planning on doing is very useful to them.

    For pages and pages it goes on like this, in her exchange with someone, presumably a staffer, named Castor. He’s obsessing over stupid Vogel-based conspiracy theories about Ukraine in 2016, and she’s like dude, focus, this is nonsense, ffs.

  246. says

    Guardian – “Brazil’s former president Lula walks free from prison after supreme court ruling”:

    Brazil’s former president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has been released from prison where he was serving a 12-year corruption sentence, after a supreme court ruling which delighted his supporters and infuriated followers of the far-right president, Jair Bolsonaro.

    Lula was greeted on Friday by delirious supporters outside the federal police headquarters in the city of Curitiba where he has been imprisoned for 580 days.

    Lula was incarcerated in April 2018 after a sentence for corruption and money laundering handed down by the controversial judge Sérgio Moro was upheld by an appeal court.

    On Thursday Brazil’s supreme court ruled that defendants could only be imprisoned after all appeals to higher courts had been exhausted, paving the way for Lula and another 5,000 prisoners to be freed.

    The decision followed revelations published by the investigative website the Intercept Brasil showing Moro had colluded with prosecutors leading the sweeping graft investigation that imprisoned Lula.

    Polls had showed that Lula was leading in last year’s presidential election, but the conviction removed him from the race, giving Bolsonaro a clear run.

    Bolsonaro then made Moro his justice minister, heightening the sense of injustice.

    Lula presided over an extraordinary period of economic growth and reduction of inequality as president from 2003 to 2010. Even in prison he has cast a long shadow over political debate in Brazil – but his release is only likely to widen political divides here….

  247. says

    NEW: WH counsel Cipollone told top NSC lawyer Eisenberg in July to talk to Trump about NSC aides’ concerns that Ukrainians were being unduly pressured. Eisenberg never did that nor reported the complaints to DOJ, believing no crime had been committed.”

    NYT link atl.

  248. says

    From text quoted by SC in comment 363:

    “EU-candidate Turkey is not the same Turkey you think you know – it is now a radical Islamist state and you, Europe, should understand that,” Ahmed said, adding that the EU should cut off accession talks with Turkey and scrap any trade deals.

    That is so true. Recep Tayyip Erdoğan is a extreme social conservative that basks ever more openly in being seen as the ruler who added territory to Turkey. He is building an autocracy.

  249. says

    From Steve Benen:

    This doesn’t seem like a positive step: “The position of U.S. special envoy to Ukraine, formerly held by Kurt Volker, the first senior official to step down in the impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump, will likely be discontinued altogether, according to current and former U.S. officials who spoke to Foreign Policy.”

  250. says

    President Trump says he may attend Russia’s May Day Parade: ‘It’s a very big deal, celebrating the end of the war. … I would love to go if I could’.”

    I saw former ambassador Nicholas Burns on TV this afternoon talking about how the invitation was something Trump should seriously consider, and how it would almost be an insult to the US troops who fought in WWII to refuse. This is frankly grotesque.

    The end of the war:

    The question of Poland dominated Yalta,… Nonetheless, the discussions were an exercise in futility. As much as Churchill tried to convince himself otherwise, Stalin was determined to rule all of Poland, insisting that the puppet government he had established in the summer of 1944 would take control of the country after the war. He was supported by Roosevelt,…

    Stalin was also aided by Roosevelt’s apparent lack of concern about leaving the Soviet Union as the Continent’s dominant military and political power….

    …When the discussion turned to the question of creating an independent government in Poland, Churchill, who had repeatedly promised the Poles in London that he would win back their freedom, did not put up the same kind of fight as he had for France…. He and Roosevelt accepted the Soviet puppet government, albeit one with some democratic window dressing. Under the agreement, the government would be enlarged to include several leaders from “Polish émigré circles,” and free elections to create a permanent government would be held as soon as possible. Roosevelt and Churchill decided to take Stalin’s word that the voting would be free of coercion, even though the Soviets had never allowed this type of election in their own country.

    Calling the Yalta agreement a basic violation of the principles for which the Allies had fought, the Polish government in exile refused to accept it….

    Scarcely a month after the Yalta Agreement was signed, reports reached London of mass Soviet arrests of Poles in Kraków and other major cities. Thousands of Poles had already been shipped off to Soviet gulags, while others, mostly Home Army officers and men, were being accused by the NKVD of spying for Britain and the London Poles, whom the Soviets called “fascists.” The Home Army troops “are starved, beaten, and tortured,” according to one account from the Polish underground. “There are many deaths.”

    In late March 1945, sixteen prominent leaders of the Polish resistance disappeared after being invited to a meeting with Soviet military commanders. A number of the missing men would have been prime candidates for top positions in a broadly based postwar Polish government. For the next six weeks, Soviets ignored repeated British inquiries about them; finally, they revealed that the Poles had been arrested. The leaders were later tried and sentenced to long terms in prison. Four of them died there.

    Notwithstanding all these reports of savage [sic] Soviet treatment of the Poles, Britain and the United States, still chasing the chimera of “Allied unity,” withdrew formal recognition from the Polish government in exile on July 5, 1945, and bestowed it on the communist government in Warsaw….

    (Lynne Olson, Last Hope Island, pp. 432-5.)

    Decades of oppression for millions of people in Poland and so many other countries followed. The US soldiers were honored on the anniversary of D-Day in June. The Soviet soldiers, who suffered and died in staggering numbers, should be recognized. But they were also Stalin’s victims. The last thing the US should be doing is joining with the current illiberal, anti-democratic, kleptocratic, Stalin-boosting, lying, imperialistic regime in Russia to celebrate the selling out of our values and many of our allies in 1945 and the vast human suffering that ensued. That moment should if anything be used to re-examine historical errors and consider contemporary issues in light of their consequences.

    (Macron is going, because of course he is.)

  251. says

    TPM – “Giuliani Buds Pressed Previous Ukraine President For Bogus Investigations, Too!”:

    Two buddies of Rudy Giuliani’s tried to arrange a deal with Ukraine’s last President whereby he would get a state visit to the U.S. during an election campaign, so long as Kyiv agreed to announce investigations into the Bidens and the 2016 elections, the Wall Street Journal reports.

    Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman reportedly met with then-Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko in Kyiv in late February to negotiate the deal. Poroshenko was beaten in an April presidential runoff election by the country’s current leader Volodymyr Zelensky.

    The meeting reportedly took place in the offices of then-General Prosecutor Yuriy Lutsenko. Fruman and Parnas had traveled to Warsaw earlier in the month with Giuliani, where they met with the country’s top prosecutor.

    Lutsenko went on to be the main source for a series of articles by John Solomon that laid the foundation for a host of baseless claims that Giuliani and President Trump have demanded Kyiv to investigate.

    State Department official George Kent told House investigators that he believed at least some of Lutsenko’s activities had been “authorized” by Poroshenko, according to a transcript released Thursday.

  252. says

    Adam Taylor:

    New details about the violence that accompanied Erdogan when the Turkish leader visited DC in 2017: “A Turkish security officer punched a D.C. officer in the nose, ‘causing massive blood flow.'”

    WaPo link atl.

  253. tomh says

    WaPo:
    Giuliani associates pressed former Ukraine president to announce Biden investigation in exchange for state visit

    Two associates of Rudolph W. Giuliani pressed the then-president of Ukraine in February to announce investigations into former vice president Joe Biden’s son and purported Ukrainian interference in the 2016 election in exchange for a state visit, and a lawyer for one of the associates said Friday that they were doing so because Giuliani — acting on President Trump’s behalf — asked them to.

    The Giuliani associates, Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman, met with then-Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko in Kyiv, said Edward B. MacMahon Jr., a lawyer for Parnas. He said they were working on behalf of Giuliani, Trump’s personal lawyer, who was operating on orders from Trump.

    “There isn’t anything that Parnas did in the Ukraine relative to the Bidens or the 2016 election that he wasn’t asked to do by Giuliani, who was acting on the direction of the president,” MacMahon said.

    The February meeting — first reported by the Wall Street Journal — shows how Trump’s lawyer and those working for him were attempting to spur investigations that would help Trump politically months before the president pressed his Ukrainian counterpart in a controversial phone call to conduct such probes.

    — Matt Zapotosky and Josh Dawsey

  254. blf says

    In Japan fairly recently, previously discussed in this series of threads, there was a move to prohibit employers from requiring female staff to wear high-heeled shoes. (From memory, it’s either stalled or been rejected.) A far worse situation has now been uncovered, Japanese women demand right to wear glasses at work:

    Public outcry after TV show exposes businesses imposing ban on female staff
    […]
    In the latest protest against rigid rules over women’s appearance, the hashtag “glasses are forbidden” was trending on Twitter in reaction to a Japanese television show that exposed businesses that were imposing the bans on female staff.

    “These are rules that are out of date,” one Twitter user said, while another described the reasons given by employers as “idiotic”.

    One woman who works in restaurants tweeted that she was repeatedly told not to wear her glasses because it would appear rude and they did not go with her traditional kimono.

    “If the rules prohibit only women to wear glasses, this is a discrimination against women,” Kanae Doi, the Japan director at Human Rights Watch, told the Thomson Reuters Foundation on Friday.

    In the Japanese legal system, that might be the case (I have no idea). But I’d argue it’s more than (quite blatant) discrimination, but a health and safety issue. I myself wear eyeglasses with some fairly “strong” corrections (plural), and refuse to even consider contact lenses (not even sure if they are even possible, but that’s neither here-nor-there). I must wear glasses or I “cannot” see (the cannot in quotes because I’m not inhibited or immobilised, only at a severe disadvantage). Wearing glasses is necessary for overall safety (not only of myself, but also for others I could not clearly see without them), and advantageous to my overall health (e.g., prevents severe headaches).

    […]
    Japan was ranked 110 out of 149 countries in the World Economic Forum’s latest global gender gap report, well behind other developed countries.

  255. redwood says

    Longtime Japan resident here and I can tell you that Japan is not woman-friendly. There are very few women in government or at the top levels of companies. They are harassed on trains and expected to stop working when they have children. Childcare is lacking. However, Japanese women have a strength that I’ve seldom seen elsewhere. There’s a popular TV show here that goes around the world interviewing Japanese women who have gone abroad to live their own lives in other places, often in developing countries. I wouldn’t be surprised to find that there are more of them living outside their native country than just about any other nationality. When you consider the way they’re treated in Japan, it’s not surprising.

  256. tomh says

    Stall, stall is the order of the day. Can’t possibly testify until a court orders them to, because, Constitution.

    WaPo:
    Mulvaney asks to join lawsuit over conflicting demands for impeachment testimony
    By Derek Hawkins
    November 9, 2019 at 2:36 a.m. PST

    Acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney on Friday asked to join a federal lawsuit seeking a judicial ruling on whether Congress can compel President Trump’s senior advisers to testify in the impeachment inquiry.

    The lawsuit was originally filed late last month by Charles Kupperman, a former top national security aide to Trump, who said he faced conflicting orders from House Democrats and the White House over whether he must participate in the investigation and needed the court to tell him what his constitutional duty was.

    Attorneys for Mulvaney said the acting chief of staff was facing the same dilemma.

    Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee subpoenaed Mulvaney earlier this week and threatened to hold him in contempt if he refused to comply. In response, White House counsel Pat Cipollone instructed him not to testify, saying Mulvaney, who skipped his scheduled deposition Friday morning, was protected by “constitutional immunity” that extended to all of Trump’s current and former senior advisers.

    The questions raised in the case “go to the heart of our representative government and its promise to secure individual liberty by dividing the awesome power of government amongst itself,” Mulvaney’s attorneys, Christopher Muha and William Pittard, wrote in the filing.

    “Mr. Mulvaney, like Mr. Kupperman, finds himself caught in that division, trapped between the commands of two of its co-equal branches — with one of those branches threatening him with contempt,” they wrote. “He turns to this Court for aid.”
    […]

    They know that, with any luck, it will be well into next year, if then, before anything is settled and it will all be academic.

  257. blf says

    In Canada (well, Quebec, which is in Canada whether or not other Canadians like it), Quebec denies Frenchwoman residency for failing to show command of French:

    […]
    A French doctoral student has been denied residency in Quebec after officials in Canada’s francophone province ruled that she had an inadequate command of her mother tongue.

    […]

    “I have a diploma from a francophone university, the first in Canada. I’m a French citizen, too, and I did all of my studies in French,” [Emilie Dubois, a graphic designer who has lived and studied in Quebec City for eight years,] told Radio-Canada.

    As an aside, being a French citizen is significant (probably). One of the requirements for (naturalised) French citizenship is a rather good understanding of Française, more than sufficient that any claim the person does not know how to speak French (see below) is patently absurd.

    The provincial government based its controversial decision on her dissertation on cellular and molecular biology. The first chapter of her work — a response to a scientific journal article — was written in English, while the remaining four sections were written in French.

    “The first letter said you are not proving you know how to speak French because your thesis is considered to be written in English,” Dubois told the National Post.

    The letter read: You did not complete program of study in Quebec entirely in French, including the dissertation or thesis.

    […]

    Dubois then took a government-approved French language test to prove she could speak her native tongue, immediately submitting the results. But months later, she was notified that the government had chosen to uphold its original decision.

    […]

  258. blf says

    ● ‘The Onion’ Launches New Cover-Up Desk To Suppress Today’s Most Damning Stories (quoted in full):

    As many controversial stories have recently demonstrated, journalists play a significant role in determining how a news item is reported, as well as which narratives make it to light. The nature of social media and the rise in leakers and whistleblowers present new challenges for traditional reportage. They also offer exciting new opportunities for intrepid investigative reporters. To meet these challenges, The Onion is launching a new cover-up desk to suppress today’s most damning stories.

    Countless reporters, anonymous sources, and leakers work to expose illegal or unethical activity, often over the objection of their more powerful bosses. This is a disgrace to journalism and absolutely cannot continue. As consummate professionals, we are disturbed by investigations into politicians, industry leaders, and other wealthy people, many of whom are too busy or have committed too many misdeeds to prevent every bit of damaging information from coming out. All too often, dogged efforts by media executives and their powerful friends to bury information or kill stories are undermined by disobedient journalists who can’t leave well enough alone.

    Our agile new cover-up desk will allow us to stop at nothing to ensure negative press never sees the light of day.

    For our new venture, we’ve assembled an industry-leading team of reporters we lured from ABC News, NBC News, the Washington Post, and elsewhere, who boast combined decades of self-censorship and ignoring substantive evidence about topics from financial malfeasance to sexual misconduct to government wrongdoing. From our new $50 million offices in Washington DC, New York, and San Francisco, they will do the hard work of following every lead and probing every dark corner to collect as much information as possible about accusers and sow doubt about their motivations and character. They will also be available for television appearances as experts, where they can repeat approved talking points about a controversial issue or figure until no one watching would believe anything to the contrary.

    As a journalistic standard bearer, The Onion has long been a champion of suppressing damaging stories about powerful people. What our cover-up desk now enables us to do is take our efforts at concealment into the 21st century. Not only will we be on the ground tampering with evidence and destroying any compromising documents that fall into our hands, we’ll also have a 24-hour secure tip line for anyone with information about a negative story that could become public. Using these methods, our reporters will be on the front lines of ruining investigations, obliterating incriminating documents, and threatening victims into silence forever.

    While we face stiff competition within the news industry to stifle transparency and accountability, we at The Onion are positive that we’ll be capable of covering up stories that other organizations would never dream of.

    ● ABC News Fires Hot Mic For Converting Sound Waves Of Anchor Revealing Network Spiked Epstein Story:

    Citing the device’s absolute betrayal of company values, ABC News officials confirmed Friday that the network had fired the hot mic responsible for converting sound waves of Amy Robach revealing that the network spiked a story on Jeffrey Epstein. This hot mic’s behavior clearly violates both our corporate guidelines and journalistic standards, and we will not tolerate such blatant adversarial reporting, said ABC News President James Goldston, who also blasted the defiant electrical signal for working in unison with the microphone to transmit the conversation about the network’s decision to bury a story about the wealthy serial abuser. […]

    ● The Onion’s Tips For Testifying Before Congress:

    […]
    • Don’t be too eager to say yes to the first congressional hearing you’re asked to speak at — it’s better if you wait for the right one to come along.
    • Start off with a light joke, like “Is this water, or truth serum?”
    • A calm, respectful demeanor is absolutely crucial unless you’re a Supreme Court nominee.
    • Remember, you only get three “passes” during questioning.
    • Iowa congresswoman Abby Finkenauer is going to carve you up. Nothing you can do about it.
    • Do not be the chairman and CEO of Facebook.
    • Have some pieces of deli meat in your pocket to keep your energy up.
    • Tell the truth unless someone who can pardon you wants you to lie.
    • While it is the congressman’s job to flirt with you, it doesn’t mean they actually like you.
    • No matter what happens, take solace that Congress never actually doles out consequences.

  259. says

    Daily Beast – “For Kurds on the Syrian Front Line There’s No Ceasefire”:

    …This area has been safe for the past six years, ever since Kurdish-led forces managed to defeat al Qaeda-affiliated Jabhat Al Nusra and some Free Syrian Army (FSA) cells working with it. Once it was secured, the self-administration of Rojava, the Syrian Kurdish area of Syria, also known as Western Kurdistan, took over.

    For years the Kurds worked hard to develop an inclusive democratic project for the whole of this part of Syria. They call it the “third way,” not with the Assad regime nor with the opposition. They built a haven for ethnic and religious minorities, marked by an emphasis on ecology, feminism, and direct democracy. The established a co-chair system, men and women sitting in the position of power throughout the self-administration and military. The system works around communes which organize daily life, economy, education, justice, and health. Now all of this is at stake.

    In the past month, everything changed in the region, including alliances. There are daily twists and pivotal changes.

    In 2011, when the Syrian crisis started the Kurds established the YPG—the People’s Protection Units—as a self-defense force. Some of the members were former PKK Syrian fighters. In 2015, the SDF was set up by the International Coalition against ISIS and it changed the balance—the majority of fighters were actually Arabs. In the past four years SDF’s priority has always been fighting ISIS, and there were no attacks north of the borders towards Turkey. According to a report by the Rojava Information Center, an independent research study group, in the first half of 2019 there has been at least 30 cross-border attacks from Turkey to Rojava. Just one in the opposite direction.

    In August, the SDF agreed to dismantle its fortifications in a designated area at the border and allowed Turkey to patrol there with U.S. forces. For Ankara that was not enough, and three days after the U.S. moved its forces out of the way, on Oct. 9, Turkey started an invasion, shelling most of the major cities of Rojava. It created chaos, killed civilians, and forced thousands to flee their homes.

    Turkey’s “Operation Spring of Peace” concentrated its efforts on two cities: Serekanye (Rais Al Ain) and Gire Spi (Tal Abyad) both on the border and about 110 km (68 miles) apart. Turkey shelled hospitals and nonmilitary targets, committing what are widely alleged to have been war crimes.

    Turkish militias known as the TFSA executed “in cold blood” Hevrin Khalef, a 35-year-old politician serving as a secretary general of the Future Syria Party. She was “dragged out of her car, beaten and shot dead,” according to Amnesty International. The coroner’s report added graphic details posted on Twitter by New York Times correspondent Rukmini Callimachi.

    Ankara never really respected the Sochi accords and, continuing its offensive despite the truce, and widening the attacks. SDF commander in chief Mazloum Abdi repeatedly exposed the violations of the truce.

    The village we were staying in is outside the “safe zone” and the fight has been intense….

    Of the current confrontation with Turkey, she says, “We never really stopped fighting, they continued the shelling. Some days were very heavy and we couldn’t move.” Everything is different in this war, she admitted. There is little ground combat, the SDF is taking many casualties due to the intensive air and artillery campaign. Drones scan the territory, then the heavy weapons target houses. So far at least 1,000 people have died, half of them civilians, says Berivan. According to medical reports over 90 percent of the victims died because of wounds from shell and shrapnel. Turkey also has been accused of using white phosphorus on nonmilitary targets. So far no one has agreed to test the sample. The Times of London and Newsweek recently reported that various NATO countries have asked the U.N. watchdog agency, the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, not to investigate this alleged offense by a NATO ally.

    “We just ask for a no-fly zone, we don’t want other armies to fight for us,” said Berivan. The Syrian regime has sent troops, but they are said to be poorly equipped with no real willingness to participate in the fight. When interviewed, one experienced Syrian team leader, Omar Abed Almajid, told The Daily Beast that the situation was chaotic. “They sent us to die,” he said while lying in a bed at the hospital in Tel Tamer on Oct. 29. “Our leaders told us we were not going to fight, we were just going to patrol the border. Instead Turkey massacred us with heavy weapons”

    Almajid was injured while trying to open a corridor for civilians to escape. His troops didn’t have any armored cars or heavy weapons to protect themselves.

    Most of the soldiers of the Assad regime’s SAA–Syrian Arab Army–expected air coverage to be provided by Moscow, with which they’ve had an active alliance since 2015. They were wrong. So far the Kremlin has stayed out of the fight while patrolling certain areas. The Syrian regime retreated from the front lines several times to try to come back the day after. This has happened almost everywhere and on a daily basis.

    The Turkish invasion of northeast Syria inspired many Kurdish young men and women to join the fight. Many have traveled from Europe….

    Much more atl.

    Yahoo – “PHOTOS: For Syrian Kurds, and aid workers – the ‘safe zone’ is not so safe”:

    The Turkish offensive against Kurdish militias in northeastern Syria, launched on Oct. 9 after President Trump’s decision to pull U.S. troops from the region, has ”severely impacted” an already dire humanitarian situation, says the United Nations. Civilians are fleeing the border areas, some heading into neighboring Iraq. Despite the ceasefire announced by the White House and Turkish President Recep Erdogan, eyewitnesses and Kurdish fighters say fighting has continued. A handful of Christian-led humanitarian groups remain in northeast Syria after major international aid organizations have withdrawn.

    Nearly 180,000 residents have fled the fighting, and hundreds have been killed, including at least 18 children, according to the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights confirmed that Turkey’s militias had initially prevented a convoy from the Kurdish Red Crescent and the Free Burma Rangers (FBR) from entering Ras al-Ain to provide aid. It said it expected deaths to rise, with many wounded unable to reach medical care. Dave Eubank, leader of the FBR, said “people are still dying, we’re going to stand with them,” as the group prepared to return to the front line shortly after one of their workers, Zau Seng, was killed by mortar fire.

    Eubank stated in an FBR video tweet: “This zone is one of ethnic cleansing with 300,000 people displaced. Many have been killed and wounded. Homes are destroyed. The Kurds are calling this area ‘the genocide zone’. The safe zone is not safe by any definition. It is the zone of the Turkish invasion. We’ve seen their tanks and been fired upon by those tanks and their aircraft. There has been no ceasefire this whole time.”…

    Photos atl.

    SOHR – “After the death and injury of several members in Turkish shelling, regime forces withdraw with their heavy vehicles from several villages between Tal Tamr and Abu Rasin, leaving SDF alone in repelling violent and large-scale attacks by factions on the area”:

    The clashes continue at a violent pace in several places within the area between Tal Tamr town and Abu Rasin area (Zarkan), between the Syria Democratic Forces against the Turkey-loyal factions, as part of the violent attack carried out by the factions Saturday morning, and the Syrian Observatory learned that the regime forces withdrew from Mashafah, Dawoudiyyeh, Qasimiyah, al-Dardarah, al-Arisha and other sites, leaving the Syria Democratic Forces alone in repelling the violent attack, which comes with the intensive ground support of tens of shells and missiles by the Turkish Forces, in addition to the flight of Turkish drones over the zone and targeting the fighting area, and the sources added to the Syrian Observatory that the withdrawal of the regime forces came after killing and injuring several members in the ground shelling, and although they possess heavy weapons, they did not participate in repelling the attack, on the contrary, they withdrew, which is what they do in every violent attack by the Ankara-loyal factions on the area….

  260. says

    Kurdistan 24 – “Turkish offensive in northern Syria forced Christians to evacuate villages”:

    The Turkish military offensive on northeastern Syria has led to the evacuation of minority groups, especially many from the Assyrian villages along the Khabour river.

    Tall Cedaya is one of those affected villages, located five kilometers south of Tall Tamr in northern Syria. Over 20 households had lived in the town, but only one family remains.

    Jamel and his five family members are the only households left in the village. “I want to let the international community know that Turkish operations are ongoing, and they have done nothing to stop it,” he told Kurdistan 24.

    “The United States has betrayed us,” he added. “President [Donald] Trump is saying one thing in the evening and another the following morning.”

    The Tall Tamar village and the surrounding Assyrian villages have been evacuated before due to an attack by the so-called Islamic State and its takeover of the vast regions in Syria. The inhabitants are now re-evacuated after the start of the Turkish offensive.

    Wardya, a 55-year-old Assyrian woman from the village, said Turkish forces had cut the clean water supply.

    “What have we done to deserve this? Why cut off our freshwater supply? This is our great grandfathers’ lands, and we will not leave no matter what they do to us,” she said.

    Before the Islamic State attacked, over 25,000 individuals lived in the settlements around the Khabour stream in northeastern Syria, with the majority being Assyrian Christians. However, after the Islamic State took over, only 1,200 remained.

    Out of 33 Christian villages around the Khabour stream, only 18 villages remain populated with a few families.

    The Khabour is one of the largest rivers of the three shared Euphrates tributaries regarding length and mean annual discharge; it is a sub-basin. It is shared between Iraq, Syria, and Turkey.

  261. says

    From Kerry Eleveld:

    […] I’ve never witnessed a moment when Warren has frowned upon the electorate. She has definitely argued that she believes Democratic presidential candidates should aim high and “think big.” That’s called leadership, not elitism.

    Warren believes this political moment calls for “big structural change” not the incremental steps that most Democratic politicians have been advancing for the last couple decades. This week Warren named the first three bills she wanted to sign into law as president as being: 1) An anti-corruption bill; 2) a bill abolishing the filibuster; 3) a wealth tax. (Note: it seems unlikely that a president would have any authority over the Senate filibuster, but a President Warren registering her strong desire to see it go would certainly boost the cause if Democrats controlled the Senate).

    Overhauling the economic system that has yielded excessive income inequality and power disparities while leaving an unconscionable number of Americans desperately struggling to stay afloat is Warren’s central theory of the case. She’s not looking down on voters. Quite the opposite, she’s both empathizing and sympathizing with them and calling on our future leaders to reform the system, not simply tinker around the edges of it.

    After African American Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley endorsed Warren on Wednesday, she joined the senator at an event in North Carolina Thursday aimed at wooing African American voters, a crucial Democratic voting bloc. “I’ve known Elizabeth Warren for a decade,” Pressley said, “As smart as she is, and she is… she’s also an empathetic and intentional student of the people. And that is what this country needs.”

    […] Biden and Buttigieg took time to remind us this week that women aren’t allowed to be fighters because angry women aren’t electable. Thanks for your input, fellas. The 60% of us ladies who will make up the Democratic primary electorate will just take a seat now until you greenlight our input.

    This pile on by Warren’s white male rivals brought me back to a 2016 piece I read in which a female columnist pondered the deceptive dodge that a lot of voters were open to voting for a woman, just not “this woman,” meaning Hillary Clinton. Reflecting on Clinton’s unparalleled experience as a First Lady in the White House, a U.S. Senator, and a Secretary of State, the columnist wondered, If not this woman, then which woman? Well, now we know the answer to that—no woman, because no candidate can win the presidency without a fight and any woman willing to fight for her strongly held beliefs is just, well, icky.

    In a fundraising email to her supporters this week, Warren called out the “angry woman” criticism for exactly what it is—an effort to put women in their place and make them play by the old rules that have been used to keep women in subservience for centuries in modern times.

    “This isn’t really about anger, or emotion, or civility,” Warren wrote. “It’s about power — those who have it, and those who don’t plan to let go of it.”

    “Over and over,” she noted, “we are told that women are not allowed to be angry. It makes us unattractive to powerful men who want us to be quiet.” […]

    Warren being a woman would be bad enough. But on top of that, this woman wants to disrupt the very power structures that have advantaged the rich and powerful in this country (i.e. mostly white men) ever since the nation’s founding.

    […] If Buttigieg and Biden think they have better ideas that are more inspirational than Warren’s, great. Warren’s policies are all out on the table and she has taken a lot of heat since she laid out her Medicare For All plan. […] Biden and Buttigieg […] may want to stop making character assessments of their female rival and get back to their own policies.

  262. says

    From Mark Sumner:

    On Friday, Charles Cooper, a lawyer for former National Security Advisor John Bolton, indicated that Bolton was involved in Ukraine-related meetings that had not yet become part of the public record. And these were not just any meetings, but “many relevant meetings and conversations” implying that they are directly connected to the scandal at the heart of Trump’s impeachment. […]

    Bolton became National Security Advisor on April 9, 2018. That puts him in place just in time for the July 2018 meeting between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin in Helsinki.

    Following that meeting, Putin had plenty to say about Ukraine. All of it about what Trump had surrendered to Russia.

    If the information coming from Russia is an accurate account of Trump’s agreement, it seems to suggest that Trump would cede Crimea to Russia on a vote of the majority. And this offer doesn’t seem to be limited to Crimea. The wording of the statement suggests that other areas occupied by Russian-supported rebels and by Russian troops playacting as rebels could also be allowed to join up with Russia after a vote.

    The “other areas” mentioned at the time would be the Donbass region, an area where Ukraine has now done exactly what Putin claimed Trump agreed to back in July. If there are additional meetings on Ukraine that featured John Bolton, they may well be focused more on what Trump was offering to Russia, at the same time he was withholding funds and arms necessary to fight against Russian invasion.

    Because Trump’s Russia scandal and Trump’s Ukraine scandal, are the same scandal.

    Link

  263. says

    BREAKING: Here’s the GOP witness list for the public impeachment hearings, as requested by Devin Nunes.

    List includes Hunter Biden, the whistleblower, and the whistleblower’s sources.

    His full letter to Schiff:…”

    Nellie Ohr.

  264. says

    The GOP Just Released Its Own Witness List for Impeachment Inquiries—and It’s All About Biden and Clinton

    Devin Nunes wants to talk about anything but Trump’s “perfect” phone call

    […] House Democrats control the impeachment inquiry process but asked for Republican input on potential witnesses last week. Rep. Devin Nunes, the highest-ranking Republican on the House Intelligence Committee that will be leading the public impeachment inquiry, sent the list to Democratic chairman Adam Schiff, along with a lengthy letter complaining about the unfairness of the inquiry to Trump. Nunes, who has long been one of Trump’s most ardent defenders, described the process thus far as “opaque and unfair,” writing, “Your actions have great damaged the integrity of the Intelligence Committee and any legitimacy of your ‘impeachment inquiry.” […]

    Most noteworthy on the list is the anonymous whistleblower whose concern after hearing Trump pressure Zelensky pushed Democrats into pursuing a possible impeachment. The whistleblower might make an obvious witness, given all he knows about the phone call, but Nunes’ reasoning is in keeping with the general Republican talking points in defending Trump. He states the president should be “afforded an opportunity to confront his accusers”—an allusion to the Sixth Amendment, which covers criminal prosecutions and not impeachment inquiries. Nunes also cites the whistleblower’s alleged “bias” against the president, the evidence of which is apparently that he is a registered Democrat (his attorney denies any political bias). […]

    Nunes also wants to hear from Alexandra Chalupa, a former employee of the US Embassy in Ukraine, who was also a former Democratic National Committee staffer. Conservative news outlets have pushed the somewhat muddled theory that Chalupa, while working at the embassy, was researching Paul Manafort’s activities in that country in the early 2010s and may have improperly passed that information to Hillary Clinton’s campaign in 2016. Chalupa has denied any wrongdoing, saying she did no opposition research for the DNC. The DNC has also denied any wrongdoing, noting that Democrats were investigating Trump and Manafort’s ties to Russia and Ukraine long before Chalupa was hired.

    Without any hint of irony or further explanation, Nunes cited questions about what Chalupa did or didn’t do in 2016 as the reason she was needed to testify about Trump’s July 2019 call with Zelensky.

    Chairman Schiff is going to have to work hard to keep the hearings on track. Republicans want a circus. Schiff wants hearings.

  265. says

    Followup to 402 and 403.

    From Adam Schiff:

    This inquiry is not, and will not serve … as a vehicle to undertake the same sham investigations into the Bidens or 2016 that the President pressed Ukraine to conduct for his personal political benefit, or to facilitate the President’s effort to threaten, intimidate, and retaliate against the whistleblower who courageously raised the initial alarm.

  266. says

    Poll: 65% of Republicans say Trump’s Ukraine scheme was normal presidential behavior.

    […] Yes, Americans believe in the impeachment power; 71 percent say we need a way to remove a politician who breaks the law or abuses power from office. That includes 83 percent of Democrats, 69 percent of independents — and this is important — 61 percent of Republicans.

    There’s a consensus: If the president broke the law or abused power, impeachment is merited. And that’s true even if the president’s name is Donald Trump. […]

    But then we drilled deeper. What counts as a “high crime or misdemeanor”? Trump lies often. Does dishonesty count? Surprisingly, majorities of Democrats, Republicans, and independents say it should. […]

    How about abusing the powers of your office for political gain? Here, the numbers grow even larger. Eighty percent said yes, including two-thirds of Republicans. […]

    How about abusing the powers of your office to enrich yourself? Eighty-eight percent said yes, including 82 percent of Republicans. […]

    These are huge majorities, reflecting a rare instance of national agreement. If a president abused the powers of office for personal or political gain, that’s a high crime and misdemeanor.

    But anyone watching this process knows we’re not seeing a rare instance of national agreement. So then we got specific: Do you think the president of the United States pressuring another country to investigate a political rival is a high crime and misdemeanor? Is it just morally wrong? Or is it just politics as usual, something presidents do all the time.

    Fifty-one percent of Americans say it’s a high crime and misdemeanor. That’s 77 percent of Democrats, 52 percent of independents, but only 22 percent of Republicans. […]

    Sixty-five percent say it’s morally wrong. That’s huge majorities of Democrats and independents — 89 percent and 74 percent respectively — but only 39 percent of Republicans.

    Forty-four percent of the country, however, says that presidents pressure other countries to investigate their domestic political rivals all the time. That belief, at least right now, is heavily concentrated among Republicans — almost two-thirds of Republicans see Trump’s behavior as typical political maneuvering. […]

    This, then, is how Republicans seem to be processing Trump’s acts. Initially, the argument was that he didn’t do it. The whistleblower was lying. There was no quid pro quo. That defense collapsed quickly and totally under the White House releasing its call record and the testimonies of top officials.

    So now, the argument has mutated: Yes, Trump did it, but it’s fine that he did it. Pressuring a foreign government to investigate your chief domestic political rival isn’t wrong, and even if it is wrong, everybody does it.

    That’s the level of cynicism Trump is forcing his supporters to embrace. […]

    Link

  267. says

    The Homophobic Activist Who Won an Audience with Two Supreme Court Justices

    New Yorker link

    In the past week, judicial-watchdog groups have raised alarm over the meeting of two Supreme Court Justices, Samuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh, with Brian Brown, the head of the anti-L.G.B.T. group National Organization for Marriage. […]

    Two days after Brown’s tweet, the nonpartisan organization Fix the Court published a blog post titled “What Were They Thinking? Justices Again Fail a Basic Ethics Test.” […] “Posing for photographs with the president of an advocacy organization that has filed briefs in matters pending before the court makes a mockery of Chief Justice Roberts’ assertion that a judge’s role is to impartially call balls and strikes,” Belkin wrote. “If you refuse to recuse yourselves, this incident will further illustrate the urgent need for structural reform of the Supreme Court in order to restore a Court that understands its role is to protect individual rights and our democracy.”

    […] Brown thinks that L.G.B.T. people should not exist. I know this because he told me.

    In May, 2016, I went to Tbilisi, the capital of Georgia, to report on a convening of the World Congress of Families, an international organization founded by a couple of Russian and American ultraconservative academics back in the nineteen-nineties. […] the plot to spread “gender ideology”; the plot to get white women to have abortions that will not only mean fewer white births but will also give the women breast cancer; and, of course, the worldwide plot to turn children gay by exposing them to Pride parades. […]

    Many of the featured speakers refused to talk with me, but Brown sat down for an interview backstage. […] He founded N.O.M. to fight against same-sex marriage in California and, later, nationwide. At the time we met, he was also about to take over the leadership of the World Congress of Families. […]

    Brown was mild-mannered, especially compared to some of the other speakers at the conference in Tbilisi, who had called for stoning gay people. I wondered: was he more of a live-and-let-live anti-gay activist? At the end of the interview, I asked him, “Do you see a way for you and me to live in the same society?” I asked him to imagine if gay people decided that we didn’t want marriage after all, if we didn’t even want to use public restrooms. “If we can negotiate,” I asked, “is there a way that my family and yours can live in peace in the same society?”

    “I don’t know,” Brown said. He smiled—awkwardly, it seemed to me—and then he said, “No.”

    I thanked him for his time and left. I ended up walking the width of Tbilisi that day, thinking about the experience of facing a very nice, very polite, very well-spoken man who told me, in effect, that if he and his allies had the power in the United States, or any other country, there would be no place for me in it. […] almost casual way in which he said “No” made me feel like I was suffocating.

    I imagine that when Brown met with Alito and Kavanaugh, he made the arguments put forth in his organization’s amicus brief: that for the Court to rule that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act protects from discrimination on the basis of gender identity and sexual orientation would constitute judicial overreach. What he meant, though, is that the rights of L.G.B.T. people shouldn’t be protected at all—that, in his ideal society, there would be no L.G.B.T. people, in fact. I know this because he told me.

  268. Akira MacKenzie says

    @ 405

    If we cannot agree on what does or doesn’t constitute political corruption, then there is no way our society can survive.

  269. says

    OMFG!

    I’m looking at some of the #MAGAChallenge videos and am horrified. And also archiving them all here: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1O4fLIz3GIT_TqY66Us8tFc7UCNsxiV-m

    https://twitter.com/AricToler/status/1192883735865286660

    Comments from Wonkette:

    As you have probably noticed if you hang out here on Saturdays, one of my favorite things in the world are terrible YouTube videos in which people sing, often very poorly, about their terrible political and social views and/or conspiracy theories they believe in. They bring a certain kind of joy to my heart.

    And yesterday, Donald Trump gave me a beautiful, beautiful gift by promising White House hangs to whomever he deems the winner of the #MAGACHALLENGE. What is that, you say? It is a thing started back in September when Bryson Gray, some guy on the “Liberals say I can’t love Donald Trump because I’m Black BUT GUESS WHAT I DO LOVE DONALD TRUMP SO THERE!” grift, in which Trump supporters are encouraged to… rap about Donald Trump. […]

    These videos, many of which were collected on Twitter yesterday by researcher Aric Toler, are an absolute gift. One which, I feel, explains a lot about Trump supporters in general. These people truly cannot be embarrassed. Also, if you lack the amount of self-awareness required to know that you are not at all good at rapping, what else are you not paying attention to? All of the things, probably.

    Like, I love Elizabeth Warren, but if Elizabeth Warren were to ask me to do a rap for her, and then put it on YouTube for all the world to see, I would say “You know, I’m not going to do that, Elizabeth, because I cannot rap and would look very stupid attempting to do so” and then I would suggest that instead we could sing some Carole King, because Elizabeth Warren seems like a lady who probably likes Carole King a whole lot.

    I would not, I assure you, do any of this. [a selection of videos is also available on Wonkette ]

    […] So many treasures! I, for one, can hardly believe we’re winning the culture war with all this talent here. Though to be fair, the “culture war” is a very one sided battle in which we go on about our business and Republicans shake their fists at the sky and scream about how the kids today don’t appreciate Pat Boone enough and sob endlessly about baristas not wishing them a Merry Christmas.

    Anyway, we’re gonna call it a day, I hope you don’t hate me for exposing you to all of this musical… something or another. But hey! At least we can now be grateful for small things, like the fact that we very rarely have rhythmically-challenged people trying to rap about anything or anyone we like, and also that (hopefully) no Democrat in their right mind would ever request this kind of thing.

  270. says

    Followup to comment 409.

    From Trump:

    I will be announcing the winners of the #MAGACHALLENGE and inviting them to the @WhiteHouse to meet with me and perform. Good luck!

  271. says

    Rep. Malinowski:

    In our #impeachment depositions, some of my GOP colleagues argued that President Trump had good reason to think Ukraine “interfered” against him in our 2016 election, and thus to demand Ukraine investigate this. Let’s take a look at the examples they cited.

    The first was this oped the Ukrainian ambassador to the US wrote in 2016, which the Republicans said showed that Ukraine was against Trump. But all it does is criticize a statement Trump made suggesting he might recognize Russia’s takeover of Crimea.

    Here’s what Trump had said – a total break with bipartisan US policy. Any Ukrainian official would have felt duty bound to push back (just as any US diplomat would object if, say, a foreign leader promised to recognize Texas as part of Mexico.

    Their second example was that in 2016 the current Ukrainian Minister of Interior, Arsen Avakov, called candidate Trump a “clown” on Twitter. Foreign officials shouldn’t use that kind of language, but to call this “interference” in our election is silly.

    Their third example was that in 2016 a Ukrainian journalist, Serhyi Leschenko, disclosed evidence that Trump’s campaign manager, Paul Manafort, was getting off-the-book payments from corrupt Ukrainians.

    I’m not sure why they think it’s bad that a Ukrainian journalist revealed actual evidence of corruption by Manafort that the FBI then used to put him behind bars. Anyway, it’s certainly not election interference.

    From Maddow last night – “Witness Paints Trump Scheme, Russian Threat In Vivid Detail”: “Rachel Maddow reads highlights from the transcript of the testimony of former senior NSC official Fiona Hill before the House impeachment committees, including details of Donald Trump’s Ukraine scheme being implemented and stern admonitions to take the Russian threat seriously and not be distracted by specious conspiracy theories.”

    My one criticism would be that because it focuses so much on Hill’s words (see #s 374 and 385 above), it suggests that she’s cutting him off before he can really get into the conspiracy theories, when in fact he’s previously gone there over and over.

    (Link to the full transcript @ #358.)

  272. says

    The Hill – “Erdogan guards attacked US Secret Service after protestors in 2017, new documents show”:

    Turkish President Recep Tayipp Erdoğan’s planned visit to Washington this week is raising concerns about a repeat of violent protests from his 2017 trip, as recent court documents provide new details about the clashes between U.S. and Turkish security personnel.

    Over a dozen Turkish security officials were first identified by the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) two years ago as instigating violence against protesters who were demonstrating outside the Turkish ambassador’s residence during Erdoğan’s last visit to Washington, D.C., though charges were dropped against most of them.

    The security officials left the country before they could be arrested. They were delivered to a waiting flight at Joint Base Andrews by State Department diplomatic security and Secret Service. One agent described it as the fastest “joint move and departure I’ve ever seen in my 16 years on the job,” according to a memo sent to the State Department the day after the clashes.

    The memo was included in court documents in a lawsuit against Turkey on behalf of the victims of the attacks and details violent outbursts against both civilians and U.S. security personnel who are charged with coordinating protection for foreign dignitaries with visiting security officers.

    “These guys are out of control,” said Agnieszka M. Fryszman, a partner at Cohen Milstein, a firm representing five people in a lawsuit against Turkey for the assault on protesters 2½ years ago.

    “This case is really important for the rights of American citizens to exercise their First Amendment rights in the United States, and it was just kind of a shocking, shocking disrespect for our Constitution and our citizens by Turkey,” Fryszman said.

    Turkey is claiming immunity from the lawsuit, arguing that its agents acted in defense of Erdoğan.

    High definition video and cellphone recordings captured the most brazen attacks, with Turkish security officers sprinting at protesters, surrounding them and beating women and elderly men. At least 11 people were taken to the hospital and plaintiffs in the lawsuit detail long-term injuries, including physical pain, memory loss and post-traumatic stress disorder.

    Included in the lawsuit are State Department memos, written from the point of view of three U.S. security officers tasked with guarding Foreign Minister Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu.

    They detail Turkish security officers attacking both civilians and U.S. security agents in multiple instances, sometimes simultaneously, over the course of the afternoon of May 16, 2017, including the attack near the ambassador’s residence and then fighting outside the Turkish Embassy.

    Two Diplomatic Security special agents, six U.S. Secret Service officers and one MPD officer sustained multiple injuries, with at least one taken to the hospital.

    “I looked up from the fight I was involved,” wrote one diplomatic security agent, “and saw a second fight taking place with another Turkish security personnel who was being flexi-cuffed and subdued for assaulting more U.S. police.”

    En route to the Turkish Embassy, U.S. security agents later described how seven Turkish security officials jumped out of the diplomatic convoy transporting Çavuşoğlu to attack a lone, female protester.

    “I observed 7 Turkish ‘Suit and tie’ security personnel (one female and 6 males) dismount their passenger van in an all-out sprint running directly toward the single female protestor,” the agent wrote. “[T]he female protestor eventually ran away and escaped being assaulted.”

    The fighting intensified among all security personnel when they reached the Turkish Embassy, instigated when a Turkish officer slapped the hand of a Diplomatic Security agent over which bags belonged to the foreign minister in the trunk of a limousine.

    “In an instant, the gaggle of officers and agents went down to the ground in a physical altercation,” the agent wrote. The fight ended with two Turkish security officers handcuffed, one having his weapon seized, and Turkish Ambassador to the U.S. Serdar Kilic negotiating for their release.

    “Ambassador Kilic asked me if I could find a way to have the Turkish security officers released by ‘looking past’ what had happened and allowing them to fly back to Turkey as scheduled,” the agent wrote.

    After about an hour and a half, U.S. security personnel released the Turkish officials and accompanied the convoys toward Joint Base Andrews, with the security officers, the Turkish president and the foreign minister, leaving the country.

    The agent in charge, who was responsible for the safety of the foreign minister over the course of the day, said the minister departed with one final criticism, blaming the U.S. agents for the violence.

    He “said that ‘this was not good’ and that he was told by Turkish officials that [Diplomatic Security] agents were the main cause of the incident,” the agent wrote. “I informed the FM that this was indeed a regrettable incident, however, not one that DS agents bear responsibility for.”

    The U.S. Secret Service and MPD declined to comment on security precautions ahead of Erdoğan’s visit on Wednesday.

    Erdoğan’s upcoming visit has drawn outrage from both Republican and Democratic lawmakers, who have condemned the Turkish president for launching an offensive into northeastern Syria, attacking U.S.-backed Kurdish forces, compromising the fight against ISIS, instigating a humanitarian disaster in the region and empowering Islamist forces committing war crimes.

    Other issues the Turkish president will likely focus on is House-passed legislation calling for sanctions on Turkey and detailed accounts of Erdoğan and his family’s finances.

    “Any congressional exposé of the Erdoğan clan’s extraordinary wealth could prove to be embarrassing. So, the Turkish president needs Trump to block any such reporting activity from going forward,” Erdemier said.

    But one thing Erdoğan’s opponents say he won’t be able to prevent is their right to protest his visit. Armenian, Kurdish and Yazidi groups are already planning demonstrations for mid-week….

  273. says

    Tom Harper, Sunday Times:

    Breaking – 9 Russian businessmen who gave money to the Conservative party are named in a secret intelligence report on the threats posed to UK democracy which was suppressed last week by Downing Street. See tomorrow’s Sunday Times story with [Caroline Wheeler]

    Oligarchs and other wealthy Tory donors were included in the report on illicit Russian activities in Britain by the cross-party intelligence & security select committee (ISC), whose publication was blocked last week by No10. See tomorrow’s Sunday Times

    Some Russian donors are personally close to the prime minister, including Alexander Temerko, who had close links to the Kremlin’s defence industry, and who has spoken warmly of his “friend” Boris Johnson. He has donated over £1.2m to the Tories over the past 7 years.

    MPs on the intelligence committee were also briefed on concerns regarding Alexander Lebedev, the former KGB spy who was allowed to buy the London Evening Standard newspaper. Alexander’s son Evgeny has hosted prime minister Boris Johnson at his Italian estate near Perugia

    When he was foreign secretary, Johnson travelled to the Lebedev’s Italian estate in April 2018 – apparently without the close protection police officers that normally accompany senior ministers of state. He was photographed by tourists at the local airport looking worse for wear.

    It is not known whether the Russian Tory donors are mentioned in main ISC report, or the classified annex. Britain’s intel agencies are understood to be “furious” at the failure to publish as all necessary steps to protect national security have been taken. See tomorrow’s ST

  274. says

    Carole Cadwalladr:

    So this is what I did yesterday. Called Britain a failed democracy. But I had to do it in the Irish parliament because we’re such a failed democracy we’ve suspended our own parliament & called an election. Which the govt knows will be unsafe. Because its own parliament told it so…

    Please watch Lord Puttnam dropping a truth bomb in the Irish parliament. Boris Johnson is *personally* blocking Russia report because ‘it begs real questions about legitimacy of the referendum’

    And here’s the longer version where I chuck in a couple of grenades at the end just because

    Videos at the links.

  275. says

    I haven’t yet read the Sunday Times piece @ #413, but Carole Cadwalladr says “The thing is that the names of these Russian donors is public record. In fact everything in this ‘leak’ is public record. This is the stuff we already know. So what don’t we know? What’s Johnson suppressing? And why?”

    She recommends this CNN report by Nina dos Santos I’d completely missed – “UK inquiry was warned of Russian infiltration, leaked testimony shows”:

    Russia’s influence reaches deep into the British establishment and successive UK governments have turned a blind eye to it, lawmakers were warned, according to multiple sources familiar with testimony given to a parliamentary inquiry.

    Members of the cross-party Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) were told that Moscow built up a network of friendly British diplomats, lawyers, parliamentarians and other influencers from across the political spectrum. One witness described the development as “potentially the most significant threat to the UK’s institutions and its ways of life,” according to testimony seen by CNN.

    The committee’s unpublished final report into Russian meddling in UK politics, titled simply “Russia,” is at the center of a storm in the UK, where parliament was dissolved on Wednesday ahead of a general election in December. The committee’s chairman, Dominic Grieve, has accused Prime Minister Boris Johnson of sitting on the report and claimed Downing Street had given “bogus” explanations for not publishing it.

    Opposition politicians have accused the government of a cover-up, saying it could raise awkward questions about the validity of the Brexit referendum in 2016 and expose the alleged Russian connections of some in the ruling Conservative party.

    The ISC, which provides oversight of Britain’s intelligence and security agencies, and whose nine members are bound by the UK’s Official Secrets Act, completed its investigation in March. Its report was submitted to Downing Street for approval on October 17, after a lengthy period of clearance with the security services. Sources have told CNN the report includes a heavily redacted annex.

    The contents of the ISC report, the product of an extensive investigation, have remained tightly under wraps. But CNN has been provided with written testimony from two of the committee’s witnesses, and has been briefed on oral testimony given by two others, all of whom warned that Russia had established deep ties to the UK political scene and that not enough had been done about it.

    Among those invited to give evidence were Christopher Steele, the ex-British spy behind the Trump-Russia dossier and Bill Browder, founder and CEO of Hermitage Capital Management and a vocal critic of Russian President Vladimir Putin. Britain’s domestic and foreign intelligence agencies, MI5 and MI6, also fed into the committee’s inquiry, according to sources familiar with the material gathered.

    During their investigations, lawmakers were told that successive British governments had downplayed the threat. One witness said “political considerations seemed to outweigh national security interests,” according to testimony reviewed by CNN.

    Witnesses whose testimony CNN is familiar with told the committee that Russian agents were targeting research roles in the House of Commons, acquiring British citizenship to funnel cash to political parties and employing public relations firms to cleanse reputations.

    Browder gave the committee a list of Dubai-based UK citizens who, he alleged, had acted on behalf of thousands of shell companies used to launder Russian cash linked to an organized crime network.

    In written testimony submitted to the committee and seen by CNN, Browder alleges that Putin had used the proceeds of illegal asset seizures and money from corrupt sources to develop a “network” of well-connected, influential British figures, enabling the Kremlin “to infiltrate UK society and to conceal the underlying Russian controllers and their agendas.”

    Unless tackled, such a network “will have serious detrimental effects on the UK democratic process, rule of law and integrity of the financial systems,” he warned.

    In the statement, submitted in September 2018, he went on to say that “the Russian state effectively uses the Western persons… taking advantage of their identities, skills, expertise and contacts in the West to infiltrate Western societies,” to amass intelligence which is then used for the Kremlin’s propaganda purposes.

    The failure to publish the ISC report means that the credibility the committee attached to the witnesses, and the conclusions it drew from their testimony, will not now be known until well after the election. Members of the ISC are appointed by the government and must go through a strict vetting process. Grieve told Parliament this week that after the last election, in 2017, it took six months to reconstitute the committee.

    Britain’s low-tech voting processes are not thought to be under threat — voters mark their choices with pencils on paper ballots. But some politicians argue that the ISC report has the potential to contain material that could influence voters’ choices at the poll. Liberal Democrat leader Jo Swinson told Britain’s PA news agency this week that the government should have published the report before the election.

    “If there is information that we should know about what has happened in previous democratic events and who has tried to interfere, the public has a right to know and the government shouldn’t be keeping it a secret,” she said.

    and this comprehensive Byline Times article by Peter Jukes – “RUSSIAN INFLUENCE IN BRITAIN: What Johnson Doesn’t Want You to Know”:

    …With senior staff from Vote Leave – a campaign which benefited from the online operations of the Russian state during the Brexit referendum – now running the Conservative Party’s general election campaign, the financial contributions of its wealthy oligarchs, and with many senior figures apparently personally compromised by past associations, the question remains: what else is in the ISC report that is more damaging than what we already know?

    Far too much to excerpt.

  276. says

    I can’t…what… “Woman’s arms found in backpack of Russian professor”:

    Police in Saint Petersburg have arrested a prominent Russian historian on suspicion of murdering a former student after he was hauled out of a river with a backpack containing a woman’s arms, authorities said.

    Local media in Saint Petersburg reported that university professor Oleg Sokolov was drunk and fell into the river as he tried to dispose of body parts on Saturday.

    Police reportedly then went to Sokolov’s home, where they discovered the decapitated body of Anastasia Yeshchenko, 24, with whom he had co-authored a number of works.

    “A 63-year-old man was rescued from the River Moika,” investigators said in statement.

    The arms of a woman were discovered in his backpack, the statement said, adding that the detained man was suspected of murder.

    Investigators did not name the man but police speaking to AFP identified him as Sokolov.

    The historian is the author of books on French statesman and military leader Napoleon Bonaparte and had acted as a historical consultant on several films.

    He received France’s Legion d’Honneur in 2003.

    Sokolov was also a member of France’s Institute of Social Science, Economics and Politics (ISSEP), but on Saturday the society announced in a statement that he had been stripped of his position on its scientific committee.

    ISSEP was founded by Marion Marechal, the niece of Marine Le Pen, leader of the far-right National Rally party and a former deputy of the party.

  277. says

    For the first time, US armored #Bradley armored vehicles from #Til_Tamir pass to #Kobani by #M4 road.”

    Pictures atl.

    Quotes from new WaPo article about Turkey’s proxy army (link atl):

    Fateh, a 38-year-old barber from the border town of Ras al-Ayn in northeastern Syria. As an Arab of Turkish origin, he was among those who could have been expected to support the incursion

    “Those people are filled with hatred and a lust for blood,” said Fateh, speaking on the condition that his full name not be used for fear of reprisals. “They do not distinguish between Arab and Kurdish, Muslim and non-Muslim.”

    “They contacted me before the offensive and said that as an Arab Muslim, it is my duty to rise up against the Kurds and help Turkey invade my city.”

    Mohammad Aref, a radiologist from the border town of Tal Abyad, said he also received a phone call, this one threatening. “Someone called me and simply said: ‘We want your head,’ as if stealing my home and driving me out of my city merely for being Kurdish was not enough.”

    Mikael Mohammad, the Kurdish owner of a clothing shop in Tal Abyad

    “They have taken over the houses of us Kurds and made them their own.”

    Mohammad said of the Syrian National Army fighters. “They walk into houses and proclaim them theirs. They kidnap and execute people for being ‘atheists’ or ‘blasphemers.’ And they are looting people’s properties in broad daylight.”

  278. says

    I wish journalists would start asking Trump and his apologists to provide a detailed narrative of what they’re claiming happened. The whistleblower complaint and subsequent testimony and documents all tell a clear story. There’s a narrative which is consistent with the evidence. The Trumpublicans have produced nothing close to this, and haven’t been asked to. Same with the Russia investigation.

  279. tomh says

    Eat the rich.

    WaPo:
    America’s billionaires take center stage in national politics, colliding with populist Democrats
    “For the first time ever, we are having a national political conversation about billionaires in American life,” a historian said.
    By Jeff Stein
    November 9, 2019 at 10:43 a.m. PST

    The political and economic power wielded by the approximately 750 wealthiest people in America has become a sudden flash point in the 2020 presidential election, as the nation’s billionaires push back with increasing ferocity against calls by liberal politicians to vastly reduce their fortunes and clout.

    On Thursday, Michael Bloomberg, a billionaire and former mayor of New York City, took steps to enter the presidential race, a move that would make him one of four billionaires who either plan to seek or have expressed interest in seeking the nation’s highest office in 2020. His decision came one week after Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) proposed vastly expanding her “wealth tax” on the nation’s biggest wealth holders and one month after Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said America should not have any billionaires at all.

    The populist onslaught has ensnared Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, led to billionaire hand-wringing on cable news, and sparked a panicked discussion among wealthy Americans and their financial advisers about how to prepare for a White House controlled by populist Democrats.

    Past presidential elections have involved allegations of class warfare, but rarely have those debates centered on such a small subset of people.

    “For the first time ever, we are having a national political conversation about billionaires in American life. And that is because many people are noticing the vast differences in wealth and opportunity,” said Timothy Naftali, a historian at New York University.

    The growing hostilities between the ascendant populist wing of the Democratic Party and the nation’s tech and financial elite have spilled repeatedly into public view over the past several months, but they reached a crescendo last week with news that Bloomberg may enter the Democratic primary. With the stock market at an all-time high, the debate about wealth accumulation and inequality has become a top issue in the 2020 campaign.

    The leaders of the anti-billionaire populist surge, Warren and Sanders, have cast their plans to vastly increase taxes on the wealthy as necessary to fix several decades of widening inequality and make necessary investments in health care, child care spending and other government programs they say will help working-class Americans.

    Financial disparities between the rich and everyone else have widened over the past several decades in America, with inequality returning to levels not seen since the 1920s, as the richest 400 Americans now control more wealth than the bottom 60 percent of the wealth distribution, according to research by Gabriel Zucman, a left-leaning economist at the University of California at Berkeley. The poorest 60 percent of America has seen its share of the national wealth fall from 5.7 percent in 1987 to 2.1 percent in 2014, Zucman found.

    But the efforts at redistribution pushed by Warren and Sanders have elicited a fierce and sometimes personal backlash from the billionaire class who stand to lose the most. At least 16 billionaires have in recent months spoken out against what they regard as the danger posed by the populist Democrats, particularly over their proposals to enact a “wealth tax” on vast fortunes, with many expressing concern they will blow the election to Trump by veering too far left.
    […]

    Piling on against the wealth tax have been corporate celebrities from Silicon Valley and Wall Street. Zuckerberg suggested Sanders’s call to abolish billionaires could hurt philanthropies and scientific research by giving the government too much decision-making power. Microsoft co-founder Gates criticized Warren’s wealth tax and mused about its impact on “the incentive system” for making money.

    David Rubenstein, the billionaire co-founder of the Carlyle Group, told CNBC that a wealth tax would not “solve all of our society’s problems” and raised questions about its practicality. Also appearing on CNBC, billionaire investor Leon Cooperman choked up while discussing the impact a wealth tax could have on his family.
    […]

    “I don’t need Elizabeth Warren, or the government, giving away my money,” Cooperman said. “[Warren] and Bernie Sanders are presenting a lot of ideas to the public that are morally, and socially, bankrupt.”

    Then there is perhaps the most prominent wealthy person of all likely to stand in the way of populist Democrats’ proposals: President Trump. Asked about the wealth tax, a White House spokesman declined to comment directly on the proposal but said in an email, “President Trump has been very clear: America will never be a socialist country.”

    But there are signs the pushback is having little impact on nixing the idea in Democrats’ minds. Rep. Brendan Boyle (D-Pa.), who has endorsed Joe Biden for the Democratic nomination, told The Washington Post he is crafting a new wealth tax proposal to introduce in the House of Representatives. Boyle’s involvement suggests the idea has broader political support among Democrats than previously thought.

    Warren’s campaign has created a tax calculator that shows how much money multimillionaires would pay under her plan. The initial wealth tax raised by Warren would raise close to $3 trillion over 10 years — enough money to fund universal child care, make public colleges and universities tuition-free, and forgive a majority of the student debt held in America, according to some nonpartisan estimates.

    America has long had rich people, but economists say the current scale of inequality may be without precedent. The number of billionaires in America swelled to 749 in 2018, a nearly 5 percent jump, and they now hold close to $4 trillion collectively.

    “The hyper concentration of wealth within the top 0.1 percent is a mortal threat to the American economy and way of life,” Boyle said in an interview. “If you work hard and play by the rules, then you should be able to get ahead. But the recent and unprecedented shift of resources to billionaires threatens this. A wealth tax on billionaires is fair and, indeed, necessary.”
    […]

    Kathryn Wylde, president of the Partnership for New York City, whose membership includes many of the country’s biggest financial firms, said members of the business community are “agonizing” over the prospect of having to choose between Warren and Trump in the general election.

    “A lot of people in the Wall Street crowd still think the world is top-down,” Wylde said. “They think the people at the top of the pecking order are still making the decisions or driving the debate, as opposed to the new reality of grass-roots mobilization. They don’t realize the way pushback to their criticism goes viral.”

    Lance Drucker, president and CEO of Drucker Wealth Management, said he has recently heard alarm from many of his millionaire clients over plans like Warren’s to implement a wealth tax on fortunes worth more than $50 million.

    “Honestly, it’s only been the last month when people started getting worried,” said Drucker in an October interview. “These tax proposals are scaring the bejeezus out of people who have accumulated a lot of wealth.”

    Some financial planners are urging wealthy clients to transfer millions to their offspring now, before Democrats again raise estate taxes. Attorneys have begun looking at whether a divorce could help the super-rich avoid the wealth tax. And some wealthy people are asking whether they should consider renouncing their U.S. citizenship and moving to Europe or elsewhere abroad ahead of Democrats’ potential tax hikes.

    “You’re hearing it already,” said Jonathan Lachowitz, a financial planner at White Lighthouse Investment Management, who said he has heard discussions about leaving the country and renouncing citizenship or other legal tax planning moves due to Democrats’ tax plans from several multimillionaires. “As the frustration mounts and tax burdens rise, people will consider it, just the way you have New Yorkers moving to Florida.”

  280. says

    Retribution coming from the Trump administration:

    On Sunday, National Security Adviser Robert O’Brien said Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, who gave a bombshell testimony in the House impeachment investigation last month on President Donald Trump’s Ukraine scheme, will be removed from his post at the White House National Security Council. […]

    The national security adviser said Vindman, who currently serves as the council’s Director for European Affairs, will be removed as a part of the White House’s “streamlining” efforts.

    “My understanding is he’s–that Colonel Vindman is detailed from the Department of Defense,” O’Brien said. “So everyone who’s detailed at the NSC, people are going to start going back to their own departments and we’ll bring in new folks.”

    That doesn’t sound like “streamlining.”

    When Brennan asked O’Brien to confirm that the decision is not retaliation against Vindman, whom Trump has baselessly accused of being a “Never Trumper,” the national security adviser’s response was that he personally had never retaliated against anyone.

    “I never retaliated against anyone,” he said. “There- there will be a point for everybody who’s detailed there—that their time, that their detail will come to an end.”

    As the NSC’s expert on Ukraine who was also on Trump’s call with the Ukrainian president in July, Vindman provided key information to House impeachment investigators on Trump’s use of American foreign policy to obtain political assistance from Ukraine.

    Trump has attacked him and other witnesses amid the investigation, baselessly claiming that they are “Never Trumpers.” Last week, Trump threatened to release information on Vindman “real soon” that supposedly proves that the colonel is anti-Trump.

    TPM link

  281. says

    Followup to comment 424.

    From the readers comments:

    Ah yes – “Streamlining” – “Downsizing” – so many Orwellian newspeak terms for “Retaliation”.
    ———————
    keep an eye on Nunes’ puppy dog, who’s been pretending to be a Ukraine expert in meetings in the Oval. They began cutting out Vindman months ago.
    ———————
    Who are they going to replace Vindman with on the Security Council? Putin or Rudy?
    ———————-
    Retaliating against Vindman, on the one hand, and demanding to know who the whistleblower is with the other. Even the media can put this together?

    And shame on O’Brian. This is the sort of thing a more principled person would resign over. There are no laws Trump won’t run roughshod over. In essence, Vindman was also a whistleblower, entitled to protection. But anything to protect the traitor sitting in the White House.
    ——————-
    So we’re only going to have unprincipled sycophants on the National Security Council? I feel safer already.

  282. says

    Who finally released the aid to Ukraine. Why? When?

    Former National Security Adviser John Bolton reportedly directed the State Department to release $141 million in military to Ukraine several days before President Donald Trump claims he himself had authorized the aid’s release.

    Bloomberg reported on Saturday that though Trump claims he had unfrozen funds for the aid on September 11 after Sen. Rob Portman (R-OH) had begged for him to do so that day, the State Department had already quietly released the aid on Bolton’s orders several days prior. Bloomberg could not verify whether Trump had signed off on Bolton’s directive.

    The department reportedly released the aid after White House lawyers found that Trump and the Office of Management and Budget could not legally delay it, a finding the lawyers had made earlier in 2019. According to Bloomberg, the lawyers detailed the finding in a classified memo to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo.

    An unnamed source told Bloomberg that White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney was blindsided by Bolton’s order.

    A spokesperson for the OMB told Bloomberg that Bolton lacked the authority to issue such an order and had not done so.

    TPM link

    From the readers comments:

    So Bolton was fired on Sept 10th and Trump claimed he released the funds on the 11th.

    I think I know why Bolton was fired.
    —————
    Does it bother anyone else that there’s no chain of command in this Administration, and that the people who know Trump best seem to respect him the least?
    ——————-
    This actually makes things worse for Trump in terms of intent. He was was still stubbornly holding on to the funds, hoping he could do so until Zelensky could announce the asked for investigation into the Bidens (the favor, though) which had already been scheduled on Zakaria’s show.

    The whistleblower complaint was announced by Schiff on Sept. 7. Bolton purportedly ordered release of the funds on September 9.

  283. says

    Trump is undermining the military justice system.

    Link

    In the United States, our military comes from all walks of life. And like in the civilian world, you have some really great people. You also have some folks who would steal from their own grandmothers. That is the nature of any large organization. When I served, I served with some great people, I also served with a couple guys who probably should have been in prison. […]

    Navy Chief Edward Gallagher was charged on ten criminal counts. […]

    1st Lt. Clint Lorance was convicted of two counts of murder and one count of attempted murder. […]

    Maj. Matthew Golsteyn is being charged with murder in the death of an Afghan man during a 2010 deployment. […]

    Two of these men are convicted war criminals, one is facing court martial for war crimes. Donald Trump has restored Eddie Gallagher’s rank and is planning to take action on the other two […]

    Lawyers for the two soldiers told Army Times that they asked the president to disapprove the findings in one case and dismiss the charges in the other.

    If you read the comments on these linked articles, which I recommend you do not do, you would find that Trump supporting veterans, and those claiming to be veterans are all for celebrating these men, two of which are war criminals, and one is facing court martial for war crimes.

    Trump never served, and the people who are whispering in his ear about these men are giving him bad guidance. Any action he takes will undermine the chain of command, the military justice system, and will give the United States a black eye in terms of human rights. Being in combat does not absolve you of acting morally and ethically. Trump would not understand that because he has no moral or ethical background to speak of. […]

    Dismissing charges, restoring rank, and pardoning war criminals is a slap in the face to every veteran who has served honorably during peace time, and in times of war.

    Details at the link.

  284. says

    Trump used money raised for vets as campaign slush fund. That alone should end his political career

    […] Among Mr. Trump’s admissions in court papers: The charity gave his campaign complete control over disbursing the $2.8 million that the foundation had raised at a fund-raiser for veterans in Iowa in January 2016, only days before the state’s presidential nominating caucuses. The fund-raiser, he acknowledged, was in fact a campaign event. [inserting text from a New York Times article.]

    From the Daily Kos article:

    […] Just think about that for a second. Trump had to admit it: Crooked Donald pretended to hold a fundraiser for veterans, but then took the money for his campaign. He stole from our veterans. And he admitted it.

    You might not remember it now, but that fundraiser was an incredibly important move by the Trump campaign at the time. He had announced that he was skipping the last GOP debate before the Iowa caucuses, which was being held on Fox News. He didn’t want to face Megyn Kelly a second time, after the, ahem, bad “blood” that had flowed between them in a previous Fox News debate.

    Skipping the debate was making Trump look small and weak, but the announcement that he was going spend his time raising money for our veterans instead of going to the debate changed the narrative. One headline read: “Trump: While they debated, we raised $6M for vets.” […]

    Now we know it was a lie, and it may have been one that saved Trump’s campaign—which might well have ultimately ended in defeat if he had lost Iowa by a much larger margin. And as god-awful as his actions were, it’s even worse when you realize that some of the money he stole from our veterans likely went directly into his pocket. Federal records show that his 2016 campaign spent $16.8 million that went to businesses owned by, you guessed it, Donald J. Trump. […]

    The president also admitted to using the foundation to settle the legal obligations of companies he owned, including Mar-a-Lago, his private club in Florida, and the Trump National Golf Club in Westchester County, N.Y. And he acknowledged that the foundation purchased the $10,000 portrait of Mr. Trump, which was ultimately displayed at one of his Florida hotels.

    So, beyond stealing from military veterans, Trump used other money donated to his foundation—donations that were tax deductible for the donors—as “a piggy bank.” That’s the phrase Letitia James used. If you weren’t angry enough, think about the fact that we the taxpayers partially subsidized the painting of that motherfucker that hangs on the wall in Florida (I hope we didn’t pay for the orange paint, at least). In all seriousness: This corruption at its most venal. […]

  285. says

    From Amy Klobuchar:

    I certainly welcome Mayor Bloomberg to the race. He’s done incredible work on gun safety, on environmental issues. And it is work of merit. But I don’t think you just waltz in and say, instead of “I’m good enough to be president,” your argument is the other people aren’t good enough — that is not how we’ve been conducting these debates.

  286. says

    The President of Bolivia has resigned:

    Bolivian President Evo Morales announced his resignation in a televised address on Sunday following weeks of protests in the country and demands from military leaders for him to step down.

    CNN reported that Morales told viewers that his resignation, which occurred after the Organization of American States (OAS) announced that “serious irregularities” occurred during his reelection last month, was for “the good of the country.” […]

    Link

  287. says

    People raise thousands for man who allegedly stabbed ‘Trump Baby’ balloon in Alabama.

    Link

    Supporters of Hoyt Hutchinson, an Alabama man who has gained widespread attention after he was arrested for allegedly knifing a “Baby Trump” balloon used to protest the president’s recent appearance in Alabama, have raised thousands of dollars to help him pay legal fees.

    A GoFundMe created on Saturday that asks for donations to help Hutchinson “pay legal fees and restitutions” for the balloon has so far raised over $28,000. The goal for that fundraising page was initially set at $6,000.

    Another GoFundMe that aimed to “FREE HOYT” shortly after his arrest raised over $12,000 during the same period.

    Hutchinson captured headlines on Saturday after he was arrested and charged with felony first degree criminal mischief for allegedly stabbing a “Baby Trump” balloon that was being used by demonstrators in Tuscaloosa to protest Trump’s appearance at a college football game.

    According to AL.com, a group of protesters had inflated the balloon for a demonstration at Monnish Park, which was located nearby the Louisiana State-Alabama football game at Bryant-Denny Stadium that Trump was attending. The balloon was reportedly stabbed shortly before the game started.

    The Tuscaloosa Police Department told AL.com in a statement that “officers observed Hoyt Deau Hutchinson, age 32 of Tuscaloosa, AL, cut into the ‘Baby Trump’ balloon, and then attempted (sic) to flee the area.”

    “Officers apprehended the suspect and took him into custody on a charge of Criminal Mischief First Degree. Hoyt was transported to Tuscaloosa County Jail where he was held on a $2,500 bond,” the department added. […]

  288. Akira MacKenzie says

    @431

    Ugh! Right-wing bastards whinge about the prospect about paying slightly-higher taxes to help pay for needed social services, yet they’ll pass the hat around to bail out a fellow redneck.

  289. KG says

    Farage has announced that he’s not going to stand candidates in the 317 seats the Tories won in 2017. This is a huge climbdown for Farage – Johnson has made no concessions to him, at least in public, since Farage announced plans last week to stand 600 candidates – and an undoubted boost for Johnson. There’s speculation Farage was ordered to do this by his master, Trump (presumably passing on instructions from his master, Putin). Farageist candidates may still take votes from the Tories in seats they are hoping to win, but his “party” (it isn’t legally a political party, but a private company) has been dropping in the polls in any case. So far, it very much looks like a clear majority for the Tories on December 12th. So it did at the equivalent stage in 2017, and the eventual result was rather different, but there is no particular reason to expect that exceptional event (campaigns don’t usually cause big shifts in the UK) to be repeated.

  290. says

    For several weeks, maybe more, Republicans have been complaining about so-called “secret” impeachment inquiry hearings that Democrats are holding. (None of the hearings are secret, and Republican committee members can be present, and they can pose questions to the witnesses. Moreover, transcripts of those hearings have been released.) The “process” argument from Republicans, meant to delegitimize the impeachment inquiry, was also a smokescreen meant to distract the public’s attention away from Trump actually did. Republicans demanded public hearings, more openness, more transparency.

    Then this happened on the White House lawn:

    Q: What do you expect for the public hearings next week?

    TRUMP: Well, they shouldn’t be having public hearings. This is a hoax. This is just like the Russian witch hunt. This is just a continuation.

    Yep. That’s what he said. Republicans claimed the media had “misreported” what Trump said.

    Get your stories straight. Sheesh.

    Then on Saturday morning, Trump told reporters that he did not care if the hearings are public.

    Trump does not agree with himself.

  291. johnson catman says

    re Lynna @437: The Orange Toddler-Tyrant has been on both sides of almost every issue . . . both sides.

  292. says

    Some thoughts from Steve Benen on the Republican argument that Congress should drop the impeachment inquiry because an election is around the corner, and the American people can decide if Trump should remain in office or not:

    […] NBC News’ First Read team published an item in September about the Ukraine scandal, just as it was starting to break, that stuck with me:

    If this is what this looks like … then it’s arguably worse than Watergate, when the dirty tricks were being conducted by Americans against Americans. But this time, is the dirty trick a sitting president dangling aid to a foreign country to get it to investigate a rival campaign?

    We learned from 2016 that the Trump campaign will do whatever it takes to win. Do national Democrats – who believe defeating Trump in 2020, not impeaching him, is the best way to remove him from office – understand what else we might see over the next 14 months?

    The Trump campaign will do whatever it takes to win. That, in a nutshell, is why the scandal can’t wait. […] Trump intended to cheat in the election by way of an extortion scheme. […]

    To let this go unpunished is to effectively encourage the president who knows no limits, and believes there can be no checks on his misconduct, to keep exploring other cheating options.

    The broader national goal should be to ensure that the United States has a free and fair election next year. Trump has already taken steps that are fundamentally at odds with that goal.

    […] As New York’s Jon Chait recently put it, “Using his foreign-policy authority to leverage dirt on Americans who oppose him is not a mistake, it is Trump’s ongoing campaign strategy. Either he will be removed from office over it, or he will use that strategy to try to win reelection.”

    To ask “the American people” to decide the proper resolution is to assume the president intends to play fair over the next 12 months. Trump has already made it painfully obvious that he has a very different plan in mind.

    Link

    Putin will not play fair.

  293. says

    johnson cayman @438, too true. Amazingly, when Trump reveals he is on both sides of every issue, he still manages to be wrong. He’s just wrong twice, once this way, once that way.

    In other news, don’t cry for Donald Junior. He deserved this.

    Donald Trump Jr. thought he would oh-so-cleverly show how easily “triggered” liberals are with an event at UCLA, but instead he and girlfriend/Trump campaign adviser Kimberly Guilfoyle ended up fleeing the stage under a barrage of chants from MAGA-hat-wearing Trump supporters.

    The angry right-wingers who chased Junior off the stage were angry that … drum roll … the guy who was trying to make a point about how liberals can’t stand open discourse wasn’t going to take questions. As Junior was challenging the crowd to “Name a time when conservatives have disrupted even the furthest leftist on a college campus” because “It doesn’t happen that way. We’re willing to listen” (ha ha ha ha ha, you want a list?), an audience member yelled “Then open the Q&A.”

    “See what I mean?,” Junior responded, thinking this proved his point. “And that is the problem. And the reason oftentimes it doesn’t make sense to do the Q&A is not because we’re not willing to talk about the questions, cause we do. No. It’s because people hijack it with nonsense looking to go for some sort of sound bite. You have people spreading nonsense, spreading hate, trying to take over the room.” Uh huh. A Trump objecting to spreading nonsense and spreading hate? That’ll be the day.

    That’s when the crowd started chanting “Q&A” loudly enough to really disrupt the event, leading Guilfoyle to start screaming at the crowd. “You’re not making your parents proud by being rude and disruptive and discourteous,” she said, before really trying to take them down a peg. “Let me tell you something, I bet you engage and go on online dating because you’re impressing no one here to get a date in person.” Reading the quotes does not do the moment justice, though. Check out the video below—and consider the adjectives Republicans would be applying had a prominent liberal woman done that.

    The video is available at the link.

    Anyway, soon after that, Junior and Guilfoyle fled the stage as the chanting continued. But again, this was not coming from the “triggered” left they had hoped to mock. One of the leaders of the protest insisted that their problem was not with Junior and Guilfoyle but with Turning Point USA, the founder of which was moderating the event. “They’re literally campaigning for Trump and they have to discriminate against his voters,” white nationalist Nicholas Fuentes said on YouTube prior to the event. “We’re going to make it known that that’s exactly what it is: a controlled conversation. People do not go to a ‘free speech’ thing and get dragged to the back of the line, kicked out, because they don’t fit the profile of what a questioner is supposed to look like.”

    Two other protesters railed against “fake conservatism” and said “We wanted to ask questions about immigration and about Christianity, but they didn’t want to face those questions.”

    It turns out that attempting to make liberals look stupid by “triggering” them with the very presence of a Trump involves said Trump being in front of a crowd that wasn’t hand-picked to cheer every word he said. And that hasn’t been going so well for Trumps lately, which is why they do it so rarely. […]

  294. Akira MacKenzie says

    @ 439

    As I have said on so many other occasions on so many other issues, there are some matters that are too important to leave to fickle, uninformed, greedy, and superstitious whims of the mob. The guilt or innocence of a sitting president shouldn’t be one of them.

  295. says

    Kentucky Republicans have backed down from the plot they were cooking up to steal the gubernatorial election. A massive outcry is causing them to backtrack.

    On Friday, state Senate President Robert Stivers began backing down from his proposal to steal Kentucky’s gubernatorial election for fellow Republican Matt Bevin.

    In a brief interview, Stivers said that if Thursday’s recanvass of last week’s election doesn’t materially change the results, which show Democrat Andy Beshear leading by 5,189 votes, it would be time for Bevin “to call it quits and go home.” Stivers had previously said the legislature could use a provision of the state constitution that hasn’t been employed since 1899 to overturn the election and even suggested such a hijacking would be appropriate because 2% of the vote had gone to the Libertarian candidate.

    While Beshear and official Democratic Party organizations had stayed mostly quiet, Stivers’ climb-down came after ordinary Kentuckians, some Democrats in the legislature, and progressive groups raised a massive outcry over the possibility the GOP would so brazenly seek to subvert democracy. Even Stivers himself acknowledged that he’d “received numerous angry calls and messages from people accusing him of somehow trying to steal the election.” You don’t say.

    The threat has not completely dissipated, though. Later on Friday, after Stivers’ new stance became known, Donald Trump himself said that Bevin “almost won, and maybe he will.” Trump went on, “I think he’s contesting it. Is that right? I think he’s contesting it.” Since Kentucky’s constitution doesn’t require any evidence of wrongdoing for Bevin to contest the results, he could still do so—and Stivers’ suggestion that he back off might not mean much if Trump continues to egg him on.

    Link

  296. lumipuna says

    Republican argument that Congress should drop the impeachment inquiry because an election is around the corner, and the American people can decide if Trump should remain in office or not

    It is my understanding that:

    1) The President is not elected by “the American people”, except indirectly.

    2) The election is not “around the corner”, it’s still several blocks away, but making a lot of noise as it approaches. As for the effect of his first term, Trump isn’t a lame duck yet either, even though he may walk like one.

    3) If the President has indeed committed crimes, a formal investigation on those crimes should be the best possible way to support informed voting.

  297. johnson catman says

    Lynna @440: I don’t know if it is a typo or what, but that is the second time you have referred to me as “johnson cayman”. It is “johnson catman” please.

  298. says

    From Josh Marshall:

    […] lawyers for “acting” Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney sought to join a lawsuit […] which lists both President Trump and Congressional leaders as defendants, asking a federal judge to decide who he and other White House officials must obey. The suit was originally brought by Charles M. Kupperman, the former Deputy National Security Advisor, and is being used, if not formally joined by John Bolton, former National Security Advisor. (Kupperman and Bolton share the same lawyer, Charles J. Cooper.)

    Still with me? Good.

    Despite the seeming oddity of a serving White House Chief of Staff suing the President, this may actually be at least in part an effort to help Trump. By joining this lawsuit, Mulvaney not only gives himself a legal safe harbor he may tie the question up in the courts long enough that it stretches beyond the life of the impeachment inquiry and thus becomes moot.

    Yes, Mulvaney may be playing that card. Maybe that, in part, accounts for why Bolton is so mad at Mulvaney and wants Mulvaney to get his own damned lawsuit. Bolton wants the limelight. And he wants it now.

    […] while House Republicans unify around the theory that Mulvaney, Giuliani and hapless diplo-donor Gordon Sondland went rogue and cooked up this whole plot behind the President’s back, the White House itself is trying to protect all of them with various assertions of privilege, which by definition mean they were working for the President. […]

    Since you can’t very well rely on coconspirators’ loyalty on the one hand while you or others defending you are publicly planning and laying the ground work to throw them under the proverbial bus. It amounts to what we might call Schrodinger’s Bus, a situation in which a foundational instability is created by people simultaneously being on the team and under the bus depending on the context and which side of Pennsylvania Avenue you’re looking from.

    […] Bolton’s protege and deputy Charles M. Kupperman began the joint lawsuit against the President and Congress, asking a judge to direct him whose orders to obey. Bolton didn’t formally join that lawsuit. But the two men share an attorney and Bolton appears to be waiting on that decision to guide his own actions. But then something unexpected happened. Chairman Adam Schiff pulled the plug on the litigation because a federal judge said he wouldn’t even hear opening arguments until early December. Schiff basically said: we’ve got plenty on the White House already and we’re not going to break our schedule because a federal judge wants to slow roll this. We’ll just add your foot-dragging to the article of impeachment tied to obstruction. (The judge later said the House could not unilaterally end the litigation; but for the purposes of the impeachment schedule, the House has pulled the plug.)

    [snipped several legal details related to national security issues]

    The lawyer, Charles Cooper, clearly has an argument to make about the different facts of the McGahn litigation. But telegraphing that Bolton knows “relevant” details as yet unknown to Schiff’s inquiry is entirely unnecessary to this nominal purpose and is clearly at odds with the goal of preventing Bolton from having to testify.

    […] Bolton was disappointed that Schiff seemed happy to have the impeachment train pass him by. He definitely wants to testify and is happy to put his finger on the scale to make it happen. […]. I guess he wants a judge to order him to do it so he can claim he had no choice.

    Bolton is a narcissist. That alone makes me think that he will find a way to testify, while also employing CYA tactics.

    And what about Gordon Sondland? Is it really remotely plausible that this bumbling, accidental figure in the drama will accept infamy and legal jeopardy to protect the President? I doubt whether any of the three proposed scapegoats – Sondland, Mulvaney and Giuliani – would make that bargain. To think that a regional hotel magnate on an extended diplo-donor junket would do so seems laughable.

    […] the people with the most information and the most ability to damage the President are unlikely to go along with this latest storyline.

  299. says

    johnson catman, @444. My apologies. I think that may have been an auto-correct, but I’m not sure. I am sorry. I will give my typing fingers a stern lecture.

  300. says

    Well, Rick Perry got something out of the Ukraine scandal: he got his donors an exclusive contract.

    A Texas businessman and former donor to Energy Secretary Rick Perry landed an exclusive energy extraction contract in Ukraine after Perry boosted him and his associate […]

    The American duo weren’t top bidders for the contract, but they beat the competition on other factors under consideration by the body that awards drilling rights, including technical expertise and financial resources […]

    The gas rights revelation adds even more weight to Perry’s role in the Ukraine scandal that threatens […] Trump with impeachment. […]

    The energy secretary has said he’ll resign by the end of the year and has refused to cooperate with the House of Representatives impeachment inquiry.

    The rights to extract oil and gas from the 1,340-square-mile block of land for up to 50 years went for $53 million, the AP reported, despite another Ukrainian company bidding more than $60 million.

    The lower bid came from a company controlled by the former Perry donor, Michael Bleyzer, and his partner and fellow Perry associate Alex Cranberg. […]

    Bleyzer was among a handful of names Perry offered — at the newly elected Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy’s inauguration in May — as suggestions for new board members on the Ukrainian state-run natural gas company Naftogaz. […]

    And Perry name-dropped Cranberg, himself a deep-pocketed GOP donor, at a 2018 event on the Ukrainian energy indsustry […] Cranberg let Perry use his private jet during Perry’s unsuccessful 2012 presidential bid, the AP noted. […]

    Bleyzer and Cranberg submitted their bid a week after Zelesky’s inauguration, and secured the rights despite being outbid by UkrGasVydobuvannya, a subsidiary of Naftogaz. […]

    TPM link

    Yeah, that all looks above board and perfect.

  301. says

    Followup to comment 447.

    From the readers comments:

    By gum, Donnie’s right. There’s corruption in Ukraine!
    —————-
    Who ever thought there could be so many criminal coincidences in one administration?

  302. says

    lumipuna @443, thanks for that. Succinct, and correct.

    In other news, Joe Biden has a Delaware problem.

    How Joe Biden helped build a financial system that’s great for Delaware banks and terrible for the rest of us.

    In early 1973, As Joe Biden was settling into his new job in Washington, DC, Ralph Nader published a deconstruction of what made the freshman Democratic senator’s state of Delaware […] so exceptional. The answer, The Company State explained, had to do with the unique relationship between government and commerce: Delaware was less a democracy than a fiefdom, contorting its laws to meet the demands of its corporate lords.

    Preeminent among them was the chemical giant DuPont. Nader took readers to Rodney Square, in the heart of Wilmington. There was the ritzy Hotel du Pont, housed in a building owned by DuPont, next to a theater built by DuPont, connected to a bank controlled by the du Pont family, surrounded by law offices and brokerages—all affiliated in some way with what was known simply as “The Company.” The du Ponts owned the state’s two largest newspapers and employed a tenth of the state legislature. The governor was a former executive. The state’s member of Congress for most of the 1970s was Pierre Samuel du Pont IV.

    “General Motors could buy Delaware,” Nader quipped, “if DuPont were willing to sell it.”

    Over the next two decades, as Biden rose through the ranks of the Democratic Party, the state’s center of gravity began to shift from the world of chemicals to the big business of other people’s business—banking, accounting, law, and telemarketing. […] Delaware was the Company State. It owed its prosperity to its willingness to give corporations what they wanted.

    Though he’s now a millionaire thanks to book sales and speaking fees, Biden has long positioned himself as the champion of the middle class, a scrappy kid from Scranton who’s fought the good fight for decades. His adopted home state is part of that identity too […] as he pursues his third and likely final quest for the Democratic presidential nomination, his record haunts him, because the interests of Delaware are often at extreme odds with everyone else’s.

    Biden did not create this system, but he used his influence to strengthen and protect it. He cast key votes that deregulated the banking industry, made it harder for individuals to escape their credit card debts and student loans, and protected his state’s status as a corporate bankruptcy hub.

    […] If you want to understand how Biden became Biden, you have to understand how Delaware became Delaware.

    Link

  303. says

    From Nancy Cook:

    […] With public impeachment hearings launching this week, Trump is expected to move into communications overdrive with an approach fundamentally at odds with what any traditional presidential aides would advise. […]

    Trump’s tactics of speaking directly to supporters, branding catchphrases and casting critical information as fake may not work as well on impeachment as Democrats gather testimony and evidence from top officials not beholden to the Trump orbit. Even Trump himself is not sure he can beat impeachment, said a person close to the White House.

    “This is a lot different than doing ‘Low Energy Jeb.’ When it does not involve smearing and innuendo, and it does not play solely on people’s emotions, then he is in trouble,” said Timothy O’Brien, author of the biography “TrumpNation: The Art of Being the Donald.” “He doesn’t argue well when there is an obvious fact pattern at play. That is his Achilles’ heel.”

    O’Brien pointed to last winter’s government shutdown, the Republicans’ failure to repeal the Affordable Care Act and slow movement on his push to build a border wall as examples of Trump’s bravado failing to help him win the political argument or public sentiment. In the first two instances, Republicans suffered politically and had to back down […] — while courts have struck down many of the president’s boldest immigration moves. […]

    The Trump approach to impeachment is expected to follow his usual response to adversity: flooding the zone with so much content that no one can tell what it true, false, biased or just plain spin. […]

  304. says

    Iran is enriching more uranium:

    A top Iranian official said Monday that the country has increased enrichment of uranium at a facility meant only for research purposes under the 2015 nuclear agreement between Iran and the U.S.

    […] Atomic Energy Organization of Iran chief Ali Akbar Salehi announced that the Fordo enrichment site is now producing roughly 12 pounds of low-enriched uranium daily.

    The move, a violation of the 2015 nuclear agreement that the U.S. exited last year, comes as Tehran has sought to pressure the remaining European nations in the agreement to assist Iran in evading U.S. sanctions on its oil industry.

    “I believe [that] in total, 5.5 kilograms is the daily volume of uranium enrichment in Natanz and Fordo,” Salehi told the AP, referring to two nuclear sites.

    Iran’s efforts to evade those sanctions imposed by the Trump administration following the U.S. withdrawal from the nuclear deal have become center to the growing tensions between the U.S. and Iran in the Middle East, which nearly erupted into military combat earlier this year.

    In a speech Monday, Iran’s President Hassan Rouhani voiced support for working with European nations to save the agreement, reportedly stressing that “by continuing the nuclear deal, we will reach a huge political, defensive and security goal.” […]

    Link

    Hey, Trump, it sounds like everybody but you wants to make a deal … or to at least restore the deal you broke.

  305. tomh says

    @ Lynna #442
    They may be backing down in Kentucky, but it looks like a sign of what’s to come in 2020.

    NYT:
    Close Election in Kentucky Was Ripe for Twitter, and an Omen for 2020
    By Matthew Rosenberg and Nick Corasaniti
    Nov. 10, 2019

    A few hours after polls closed in Kentucky last Tuesday, a Twitter user writing under the handle @Overlordkraken1 posted a message to his 19 followers saying he had “just shredded a box of Republican mail-in ballots.”

    It was clear that the Kentucky governor’s race was going to be excruciatingly close, and that the Republican incumbent, Matt Bevin, could be headed to defeat. But just in case anyone missed the significance of the destroyed-ballots claim, @Overlordkraken1 added a final touch to his tweet: “Bye-Bye Bevin,” he wrote.

    For those eager to cry fraud as a reliably red state leaned blue, the fact that @Overlordkraken1 did not appear to be in Kentucky — Louisville was misspelled in the location tag on his tweet, for one thing — was not going to get in the way of a useful narrative. Nor was Twitter’s decision to suspend his account.

    Within hours of @Overlordkraken1’s tweet, as it became apparent that Mr. Bevin was trailing in the vote tally, hyperpartisan conservatives and trolls were pushing out a screenshot of the message, boosted by what appeared to be a network of bots, and providing early grist for allegations of electoral theft in Kentucky. High-profile right-wing figures were soon tweeting out their own conspiracy theories about the election being stolen — messages that were in turn pushed by even more trolls and bots — and the Bevin campaign began talking about “irregularities” in the vote without offering any specifics or evidence.

    The talk has only intensified in the days since, though it has yet to be matched by any evidence of actual election rigging. But with Mr. Bevin’s choosing not to concede, and Kentucky authorities’ preparing to recanvass all of the votes at his insistence, Kentucky is shaping up to be a case study in the real-word impact of disinformation — and a preview of what election-security officials and experts fear could unfold a year from now if the 2020 presidential election comes down to the wire.

    Since his election four years ago, Mr. Bevin has hitched himself to President Trump, and his allegations of irregularities echo the Trump playbook. Mr. Trump has sown doubts about a “rigged election” system since before his own election, including openly questioning the mail-in ballot process in Colorado. He then contended that fraud had lost him the popular vote (which Hillary Clinton won by 2.9 million votes). And he has amplified similar theories while in office, tweeting at least 40 times about unfounded voter fraud allegations, according to an analysis by The New York Times, including a claim after the midterm elections last year that “many ballots are missing or forged” in Florida.

    Such divisive rhetoric after close elections has always risked shaking public faith in essential democratic institutions. But in a profoundly polarized country where narrow margins are hardly uncommon, sophisticated networks of social media users — human and bot — can quickly turn partisan rancor into grave threats, rapidly amplifying disinformation and creating an initial veneer of vast discord that can eventually become self-fulfilling.

    “It shows how the same divisions that the Russians sought to expose in 2016 remain real vulnerabilities in our democracy,” said Laura Rosenberger, director of the Alliance for Securing Democracy, a nonpartisan group in Washington focused on election security. “The ugly partisanship that is dominating our democratic discourse continues to create openings for those who want to weaken our institutions and use the online space to fuel conspiracies or advance their own agenda.”

    Mr. Bevin has not elaborated on the nature or source of the perceived irregularities, and his campaign did not respond to multiple requests for comment.
    […]

    Graphika, a company that specializes in analyzing social media, agreed with the conclusion that much of the activity around the Kentucky vote was domestic and not likely to have been pushed by any foreign power. Graphika said the tweets about electoral fraud appeared to land in what it calls a “Trump core” — a large number of highly interconnected social media accounts, many run by real people, that are typically reactive and loud and can keep a conversation going for days at a time.

    But much like the Russian-backed networks of bots and trolls that impersonated Black Lives Matter activists in 2016, or more recently seized on divisive issues like gun rights after a mass shooting, the accounts that quickly amplified doubts and disinformation about the Kentucky election seemed ready for the occasion.

    The tweet about the shredded ballots was first noticed by the secretary of state’s office, which alerted law enforcement officials and Twitter. The tweet was quickly taken down, but by then it had already been captured in a screenshot and would be widely shared.

    Data compiled by VineSight, a start-up that detects disinformation on social media, showed that many of the accounts that tweeted the screenshot of @Overlordkraken1’s ballot-shredding claim appeared to be bots. Their tweets, in turn, were spread by other bots.

    Of the more than 3,800 accounts that VineSight detected tweeting the screenshot, at least 2,350 appeared to be bots, based on an analysis of the accounts’ activities, including how quickly and how often they tweet.

    One was an account that went by the handle @ConservaMomUSA and had both human and bot characteristics. @ConservaMomUSA’s post about the ballot shredding was retweeted about 1,300 times, and nearly 60 percent of that traffic was from bots, VineSight found.
    […]

    The disinformation quickly grew beyond the allegation of shredded ballots. The conspiratorial hashtag #StopTheSteal, which had been prevalent in the 2018 midterm elections, then silent for nearly a year, spiked late on election night, tweeted more than 1,200 times, largely by accounts with bot-like characteristics.
    […]

    “Now we see as a reality that Kentucky was prime fertile breeding ground to amplify tactics that have previously been used in the 2016 election, and try out new tactics that I do believe will most likely continue to be used in the 2020 election,” said Alison Lundergan Grimes, the Kentucky secretary of state, a Democrat who ran unsuccessfully in 2014 against Senator Mitch McConnell, the majority leader. She said it foreshadowed “what is to come in elections not only here in the Commonwealth, but all across this nation.”

    By Thursday, the online campaign was melding with real-world action. A supporter of Mr. Bevin, Frank Simon, had set up a robocall network telling people to “please report suspected voter fraud” to the state Department of Elections.

    There are no indications of any voter fraud in Kentucky, according to Ms. Grimes.

    “Beyond the routine calls that we field, up to and on Election Day, there are no irregularities that would substantiate a 5,000-vote difference margin that now separates unofficially Governor-elect Beshear with Governor Bevin,” she said.

    While the Kentucky election, held in an off-year, remains a sideshow to most people outside the state, election security experts see in it a worrying sign of what Americans may be forced to contend with next November.

    A situation like Kentucky’s, but on a national scale, would at the very least leave the government “paralyzed in terms of any real policy, domestically or abroad,” said George Beebe of the Center for the National Interest, a conservative think tank in Washington.

    “We are not going to be able to actually do things,” Mr. Beebe said. “It’s going to be a challenge, I think, to hold things together. Where this is pointing is a crisis of systemic legitimacy.”

    As an aside, the last time a Kentucky governor’s election was contested, in 1899, the governor was assassinated and it almost provoked a civil war in the state. They took their elections seriously back then.

  306. says

    NBC – “Judges tosses Trump suit over New York tax returns, rejects conspiracy claim”:

    A federal judge on Monday dismissed President Donald Trump’s lawsuit to prevent the House Ways and Means Committee from utilizing a recently passed New York law providing the panel an avenue to pursue his state tax returns.

    Judge Carl Nichols of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that his court was not the proper jurisdiction to hear the case, leaving open the option that Trump sue New York officials elsewhere.

    In his lawsuit, Trump sued to preemptively block the House Ways and Means Committee from requesting the returns, New York Attorney General Letitia James from enforcing the law, and to stop the New York Department of Taxation from furnishing the documents.

    The House Ways and Means Committee has not taken any action related to the new New York law.

    Nichols also ruled that Trump did not sufficiently establish a conspiracy between the House Ways and Means Committee and the New York defendants, which would have strengthened his case for the lawsuit to be heard in Washington, D.C. Trump argued that Washington, D.C. was the proper venue through a legal theory known as “conspiracy jurisdiction.”

    “But nowhere in his Amended Complaint does Mr. Trump allege the existence of a conspiracy; in fact, the word ‘conspiracy’ does not even appear in his pleadings,” Nichols wrote.

    Trump’s personal attorney Jay Sekulow said in a statement on Monday that, “We are reviewing the opinion. The case against the Ways and Means Committee proceeds in federal court.”

    (In a cable news panel a few weeks ago, the pundits were doing the thing where they bash Democrats in the guise of offering unsolicited advice. The conversation turned, as it does, to how the Dems were confusing “regular people” with their legalistic DC language. One of the commentators offered as an example… “shall” (as in “the Treasury Secretary ‘shall furnish’ the requested tax returns or return information to the relevant committee”). Shall! Yes, the Dems are leaving ordinary Americans hopelessly confused with their highfalutin five-letter words.)

  307. says

    Republican representative Peter King (New York) has announced he won’t run for re-election. There’s already a Democratic candidate for his district, and this will make it even more competitive.

  308. says

    Guardian – “British founder of White Helmets found dead in Istanbul”:

    The British founder of the organisation that trained the Syrian rescue group known as the White Helmets has died in Istanbul.

    A spokesman for the White Helmets confirmed on Monday afternoon the death of James Le Mesurier and said further details were yet to be established.

    Le Mesurier, 48, was found dead near his apartment in central Istanbul’s Beyoğlu neighbourhood at around 4.30am. Turkish media reports said he was found with fractures to his head and legs and appeared to have fallen from a balcony.

    The office of Istanbul’s governor said it had commenced a “comprehensive” investigation. The Reuters news agency said it had been told his death was being treated as suspected suicide.

    Friends said Le Mesurier had been operating for years under significant pressure from orchestrated attacks on his reputation and the stress of running a high-profile NGO.

    The former British army officer founded Mayday Rescue, a not-for-profit group that organised and trained the White Helmets, officially known as Syrian Civil Defence.

    The group, made up of more than 3,000 volunteers, operates inside opposition-held areas in Syria and has been credited with saving the lives of thousands of people affected by Russian and Syrian airstrikes and bombings.

    White Helmet workers rush to the scenes of bombings to try to rescue the wounded from the rubble. They have also helped to document alleged war crimes, including the use of chemical weapons.

    The Guardian has previously documented how the organisation has been the target of a disinformation campaign, conducted with the support of the Russian government, that positions it as an al-Qaida-linked terrorist organisation.

    Le Mesurier had been subject to similar campaigns and was targeted by Russia’s foreign ministry as recently as last week.

    [The Russian MFA’s tweet read: “#Zakharova: The White Helmets’ co-founder, James Le Mesurier, is a former agent of Britain’s MI6, who has been spotted all around the world, including in the #Balkans and the #MiddleEast. His connections to terrorist groups were reported back during his mission in #Kosovo.”]

    The NGO’s funders currently include the British and German governments. The Trump administration froze US funding, which made up about one-third of the total, without public explanation in early 2018, but resumed giving financial aid last month amid criticism of its decision to withdraw US troops from north-eastern Syria….

  309. says

    tomh @452, well that’s depressing, and distressing. If they don’t win, they will whine a lot, they will invent voter fraud scenarios that don’t really exists, and they will employ bots and trolls to push disinformation. Sheesh!

    In other news, it looks like some officials at the EPA are being investigated … again:

    The Environmental Protection Agency’s inspector general is investigating whether chief of staff Ryan Jackson was involved in destroying internal documents that should have been retained, according to two people familiar with the matter.

    The IG’s office is asking witnesses whether Jackson has routinely destroyed politically sensitive documents, including schedules and letters from people like lobbyist Richard Smotkin, who helped arrange a trip for then-EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt to Morocco when he was in office, according to one of the sources, a former administration official who told investigators he has seen Jackson do that firsthand […].

    Politico link

  310. says

    The second link @ #460 seems to be the same as the first. Here’s Schiff’s link to both:

    “Laura Cooper’s testimony reveals how Trump froze Congressionally-approved aid to Ukraine. Cooper raised concerns about this hold, as did others.

    She also told us how Volker implied the hold might be resolved if the Ukrainians issued a statement.

    Read:…”

  311. says

    Greg Sargent:

    The epic rant from Rep Jim Himes about the both-sidesing of the Ukraine scandal is a seminal moment.

    The whole episode shows how Trump’s propaganda works: The goal is to get disinformation treated respectfully.

    That’s what happened here.

    New piece:… [WaPo link atl]

    We should focus on what Biden *actually did* in Ukraine.

    In that context, all these diplomats have also testified to a bigger story, in which Trump’s use of Ukraine as a pawn also aligns us with corrupt kleptocracy against western liberal democracy.

    Jon Favreau:

    This is an important piece that shows the dangers of coverage that focuses on the partisan politics of impeachment instead of the substance.

    The entire Republican strategy is built on hoping that this is covered as partisan politics.

    The big question for reporters, editors, and pundits in the coming weeks: will we allow ourselves to get played once again by people who spread disinformation and regularly insult our intelligence, or will we call out their bullshit?

    Here’s the video of Himes yesterday on MTP.

    So far, the media aren’t giving me much reason for optimism. Several today have asked Democrats and each other what the Democrats have to do to present the story in a clear way to the public. Here’s a novel idea: why don’t you present the story in a clear way to the public, and leave the theater reviews to the reviewers?

  312. says

    Julia Davis:

    Trump and his minions wanted Ukraine to falsely assume the responsibility for Russia’s interference in the U.S. elections—thereby, allowing Trump to “invalidate” the Mueller report and lift the sanctions.
    #AllRoadsLeadToPutin #Russia

  313. says

    NEWS: Lawyers for Mick Mulvaney late today said they are withdrawing their motion to intervene in the Charles Kupperman lawsuit.

    They will file their own lawsuit as a separate case, NBC’S Pete Williams reports.”

  314. says

    ANDERSON, a State official, said Trump called Bolton at home in Jan. 2019 to complain about a CNN story that made it seem like the Navy was pushing back on Russian aggression in the Black Sea.

    ANDERSON says the WH canceled a ‘routine’ naval freedom-of-passage maneuver in the black sea after a CNN report made it appear to be a repsonse to Russian aggression.

    The move was rescheduled later for the 5th anniversary of the Russian invasion of Crimea.”

    I hope the media is starting to get that this isn’t about Trump’s ego.

  315. says

    Priest of Armenian Catholic Church Hovsep Petoyan (Hanna Ibrahim) and his father Ibrahim Hanna Bido were shot dead on the road from Hasakah to Deir-ez-Zor to restore the Armenian church. ISIS claimed responsibility for the execution.”

    Horrific scenes in Qamishlo NE Syria where multiple explosions reported. One of the explosion reportedly occurre near Chaldean Christian Church, one other in a busy market. Possibly there is a third explosion. Deads and injuries reported.”

    Guardian – “Syrian Kurd leader hits out at UK’s ‘almost invisible’ response to Turkish invasion”:

    The leader of the Syrian Kurd civilian government has accused Britain of being almost invisible in its condemnation of the Turkish invasion in Syria, saying the UK appeared unwilling to offend Ankara because it feared isolation after leaving the European Union.

    Ilham Ahmed, the president of the Syrian Democratic Council, the political wing of the Syrian Democratic Forces, criticised Donald Trump’s decision to give the green light to the Turkish invasion of north-east Syria as a historic crime that will leave the US struggling for allies across the Middle East unless Congress can force the US president to change his thinking quickly.

    In London to lobby Foreign Office ministers, Ahmed has already been in the US where she was instrumental in persuading Congress last month to vote for wide-ranging sanctions against Turkey.

    She asked the world to remember the 11,000 SDF fighters who died over the past four years in the battle to defeat Isis, describing the decision to abandon them as “a crime of historic proportions”.

    “It is tragic to see the response to those who made these sacrifices to protect humanity. The fighters who fought and have been lost in this war would not want the rights of their communities taken away”.

    Ahmed has also met the French president, Emmanuel Macron, who, she claimed, expressed his personal frustration at Trump’s unilateral decision-making on Syria.

    Speaking about the UK, she said: “The people in Britain – most sections of society – have expressed what they think about the recent Turkish military operation, but the British government position has been very weak, almost invisible and hardly anything has been said, or at least nothing clear.

    “Now with the situation in Brexit and the cutting of ties with the EU, it seems the British may be trying to develop its links with countries like Turkey, and that is a source of real worry. By occupying itself so much with Brexit, Britain seems to have isolated itself from what is happening in the rest of the world.

    “It seems ridiculous how much time Britain spends only on Brexit when its security is being compromised due to the Turkish invasion, and the sudden withdrawal of American forces by Trump.

    “It has meant many IS fighters have fled that we have kept in jail. Every day there are people trying to help these fighters escape, and some have made it over the border to Turkey, and doubtless on to Europe. We are trying to detain as many as 30,000 people and also cope with a war against Turkey. There is simply no international co-ordination to to deal with these fighters, or how to keep them safe, or to try them in Syria.”

    She called on Britain to suspend arms supplies to Turkey and to help with the detention of British Islamic state fighters held by the SDF. She also called for support for an international force – as proposed by Germany – on the Syrian Turkish border, a no-fly zone and suspension of EU trade links with Turkey, and British support for the inclusion of the SDC in the Geneva talks on a future constitution for Syria.

    Amid fears that the Turkish president, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, will carry out his threat to deport as many as 2 million Syrian refugees into the north-east of the country, she urged the EU to enter talks with her administration about an alternative plan for the refugees.

    With Erdoğan due to meet Trump on Tuesday, Ahmed said the world “should be in no doubt that Turkey is continuing to commit war crimes in Syria”.

    Ahmed said Kurdish Syrian fighting forces have in recent weeks looked for protection from Russia, and was exploring informal links with the Syrian government army, but said those discussions were still at a preliminary stage.

  316. says

    Politico – “House lawmakers urge Trump to rescind Erdoğan’s White House invite”:

    A bipartisan bloc of 17 House lawmakers is urging President Donald Trump to disinvite Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan from a planned White House visit on Wednesday.

    In a letter led by House Foreign Affairs Chairman Eliot Engel (D-N.Y.), the 15 House Democrats and two Republicans said Turkey’s invasion of northern Syria last month “has had disastrous consequences for U.S. national security, has led to deep divisions in the NATO alliance and caused a humanitarian crisis on the ground.”

    “Given this situation, we believe that now is a particularly inappropriate time for President Erdogan to visit the United States, and we urge you to rescind this invitation,” the lawmakers wrote.

    Lawmakers also cited Turkey’s purchase of the Russian-made S-400 missile system and other moves that have drawn the NATO ally closer to Moscow as well as Erdoğan’s undermining of domestic democratic institutions.

    The Turkish president is slated to visit the White House and hold a joint press conference with Trump on the same day as the first public hearing of the House impeachment inquiry into the president’s dealings with Ukraine….

    Ilhan Omar has now signed on, which is a step in the right direction.

  317. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    The late Rep. Elijah Cummings widow was on Rachel Maddow announcing she would be running for her husbands seat. She also has a health issue which she is addressing. Impressed me as a formidable candidate. Video in the morning if available.

  318. says

    Thanks, militantagnostic @ #474.

    From that link:

    Roddie Edmonds did not back down and replied: “According to the Geneva Convention, we only have to give our name, rank and serial number. If you shoot me, you will have to shoot all of us, and after the war you will be tried for war crimes.”

    From the official WH transcript of yesterday’s speech:

    Roddie responded, “Major, you can shoot me, but you’ll have to kill us all.” That’s something. (Applause.)

    In the video, though, he doesn’t say “That’s something.” He steps back and literally just says “Something.” Did the part about being tried for war crimes on the TelePrompter strike such fear in him that he physically recoiled from the microphone and could only sputter out “something”? Or did his basic reading skills fail him once again?

  319. says

    openDemocracy – “Number 10 abused its power by demanding cover-up of donors and friends of Boris in report on Russian influence”:

    Downing Street acted “beyond the conventions of its authority” by demanding that specific names be removed from a report into Russian influence on UK politics by the parliamentary Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC), according to sources close to the committee.

    The redactions are understood to have been ordered to protect London-based Russian oligarchs who are either leading donors to the Conservative Party or individuals regarded as friends of the prime minister, Boris Johnson.

    According to Whitehall sources close to the ISC, with detailed knowledge of how it operates, Number 10 or senior ministers can order the redaction of names only if publication is regarded a matter of national security.

    One source said: “If it is simply politically inconvenient or embarrassing for Number 10 or the Conservative Party that individuals are named in a controversial report, that cannot be an official reason to issue an order that names be covered up.

    “However if Downing Street does genuinely believe these names represent a security risk, then the importance of this report and the need for its immediate publication has just grown.”

    The source added that Downing Street has acted “beyond the conventions of its authority”….

  320. says

    From Politico’s “The insider’s guide to the impeachment hearings”:

    …Here’s a look at the six figures [more Dans than women – SC] who will play the most critical roles in the impeachment hearings.

    Daniel Goldman
    Schiff is expected to yield much of his time to Goldman, a former federal prosecutor who serves as the Intelligence Committee’s director of investigations. Goldman spent 10 years as a federal prosecutor with the Southern District of New York.

    Goldman was featured prominently in the deposition transcripts, and he’ll likely play a similarly outsize role during the public hearings.

    Daniel Noble
    Like Goldman, Noble also worked in the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York. He specialized in cybercrime and organized crime prosecutions.

    Noble was brought on to the Intelligence Committee in March as a senior counsel and has been intimately involved in the private questioning of witnesses throughout the impeachment inquiry. In addition to Goldman, Schiff is likely to tap Noble for public questioning, too.

    Steve Castor
    In moving Rep. Jim Jordan to the Intelligence Committee, Republicans also brought over his chief counsel for the Oversight Committee, Steve Castor. Sources familiar with GOP planning say Nunes will yield much of his time during the 45-minute round of questioning to Castor, who has endeared himself to GOP lawmakers for sharply grilling witnesses during the depositions.

    Adam Schiff
    If you didn’t already know it from the president’s tweets, Schiff is the public face of Democrats’ impeachment inquiry — and it’s a role he clearly relishes. A former federal prosecutor, Schiff is Public Enemy No. 1 for Trump and his GOP allies, who have accused him of everything from lying to treason.

    Schiff is a close ally of Speaker Nancy Pelosi, making it nearly certain that the hearings will go exactly the way Pelosi wants them to.

    In many ways, Schiff was made for this moment. Democrats trust him, and they believe he’s their most effective messenger for a process with so many built-in political landmines — one that many of them, including Pelosi, were once extremely reluctant to embrace.

    Devin Nunes
    Nunes has emerged in recent years as Trump’s most hardline defender in Congress, one of the few lawmakers who, when Republicans previously controlled the House, was willing to use his gavel to undermine the investigations of the Trump campaign’s contacts with Russia. He’s been a Fox News fixture, insisting that Trump is the victim of coup attempts and conspiracies. As a result, he’s become a polarizing figure in the House.

    Though Nunes is likely to delegate most of his questioning time to committee lawyers, his presence at the center of the dais will be a comfort to Trump, even if he’s not asking many questions.

    Jim Jordan
    Jordan is a fierce questioner and fire-breathing defender of Trump — but until last week, he wasn’t even on the Intelligence Committee. But his consistently aggressive defense of the president pushed House GOP leader Kevin McCarthy to install Jordan on the panel (and remove a less prominent Republican member) and give him a chance to put his tenacity on display.

    Still, Jordan’s role may also be less than meets the eye. Since Schiff and Nunes will control the vast majority of the questioning time (and will likely delegate it to staff), Jordan himself may be relegated to a five-minute cameo like most of the other committee members, unless other colleagues on the panel decide to yield their time to him.

  321. says

    Politico – “Federal health contract funneled hundreds of thousands of dollars to Trump allies”:

    At least eight former White House, presidential transition and campaign officials for President Donald Trump were hired as outside contractors to the federal health department at the cost of hundreds of thousands of dollars per year, according to documents newly obtained by POLITICO.

    They were among at least 40 consultants who worked on a one-year, $2.25 million contract directed by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Seema Verma. The contractors were hired to burnish Verma’s personal brand and provide “strategic communications” support. They charged up to $380 per hour for work traditionally handled by dozens of career civil servants in CMS’s communications department.

    The arrangement allowed the Trump allies to cycle through the federal government’s opaque contracting system, charging hefty fees with little public oversight or accountability.

    Over a four-and-a-half month stretch from September 2018 to January, the contractors collectively billed at least $744,000. The Department of Health and Human Services halted the contract in April in the face of widespread criticism after POLITICO reported on Verma’s extensive use of communications consultants.

    But under the terms hammered out last year, revealed for the first time, CMS agreed to allow at least four consultants to bill up to $204,000 over the length of the contract. That included one longtime Verma ally — Marcus Barlow, her spokesperson while she was an Indiana-based consultant to then-Gov. Mike Pence — who was greenlighted to bill as much as $425,000 for about a year’s worth of work.

    Those are far higher rates than for the department’s regular communications staff and even the agency’s top political appointees. Senior career officials in the CMS communications department were paid about $140,000 last year. HHS Secretary Alex Azar’s annual salary is $203,500, a spokesperson said.

    POLITICO obtained roughly 200 pages of billing documents, which were prepared by HHS in response to a congressional oversight request, from a former House staffer and confirmed the authenticity of the files with multiple sources.

    The GOP consultants mostly worked as subcontractors through Nahigian Strategies, a communications firm that’s hired multiple veterans of the Republican party and GOP campaigns. The firm was brought in by Trump officials under the umbrella of public relations giant Porter Novelli, which has long maintained a slew of contracts with the federal government.

    Nahigian Strategies is run by brothers Ken Nahigian — who led the Trump transition team in early 2017 — and Keith Nahigian, who has worked for multiple GOP presidential campaigns. Over a four-month period reviewed by POLITICO, Nahigian Strategies collectively charged $275,565 for a range of strategic communications duties, and the brothers themselves billed roughly $56,970 for their personal services at a $379.80 hourly rate.

    The contractors brought in by the Nahigians included Brad Rateike, an adviser to Trump’s 2016 campaign and former White House communications official before leaving the administration in July 2018. Six months later, Rateike billed roughly $1,150 for just three-and-a-half hours of work as an outside consultant.

    Maggie Mulvaney — a Republican fundraiser — charged more than $2,500 for a stint as a contractor in October 2018. She has since joined the Trump reelection campaign. Zachary Lamb, who staffed the advance team for Trump’s 2016 run, billed $7,388.52 that same month.

    And Taylor Mason, a Nahigian Strategies employee who was formerly a regional press secretary for Trump’s inaugural committee, accounted for at least $54,900 in charges for four months of work in late 2018 and early 2019.

    Lynn Hatcher, a former intern for Vice President Mike Pence before joining Nahigian Strategies, and Justin Caporale, who was a top aide in the Trump White House, briefly worked on behalf of CMS after leaving the White House.

    Pam Stevens, who did two short stints in the Trump administration, was brought in to CMS as an independent consultant through Porter Novelli. The firm billed CMS roughly $280 per hour for Stevens, a longtime GOP media adviser who specializes in promoting Republican women.

    Barlow — who previously worked for a series of Indiana Republicans — had served as a spokesperson for Verma’s own health policy consulting firm, SVC Inc., prior to her appointment to Trump’s health department. But Barlow was blocked from following Verma into CMS after the White House found out he’d written a column in an Indianapolis newspaper calling Trump “offensive and ignorant” and vowing never to support him in the run-up to the 2016 election.

    Instead, Barlow became a highly paid shadow staffer — helping write Verma’s speeches, providing strategic advice and even screening potential CMS hires, first as an employee of Nahigian Strategies and later as an independent consultant, according to his billing records and multiple people familiar with the workings of the department. Between September 2018 and January, Barlow billed CMS for more than $150,000 as an independent consultant.

    Previous administrations have…utilized contractors to aid the rollout of new laws and programs, such as the Obama administration’s public launch of the Affordable Care Act.

    But health department veterans stressed that those contractors were traditionally relied on for specific initiatives, not the daily work of the agency or for so narrowly supporting a senior official. There is similarly little precedent for a top political appointee like Verma directing government funds toward consultants dedicated to boosting her public visibility — let alone so many of them….

  322. says

    “Gates says Stone told him as far back as April that information would be leaked out by WikiLeaks. So they had been hoping and waiting for it since then.”

    The timeline is important.

    Lots of Russia hacking occurred in March/April 2016, per special counsel indictment.

    Julian Assange announced publicly that he had Clinton-related material he planned to publish in June.

    Stone told Gates in April WikiLeaks would leak info.”

    Yes, this is very early. Hm.

  323. says

    SC @484, as long as Trump himself is not paying, such corrupt behavior is fine with him. As long as taxpayers’ money is being used to feed the creatures in the swamp, all is fine. Disgusting.

  324. says

    Talking points from the GOP, unpersuasive talking points, but it is all they’ve got:

    * The July 25 call summary — the best evidence of the conversation — shows no conditionality or evidence of pressure, the memo claims.

    * Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and President Trump have both said there was no pressure on the call, it says.

    * The Ukrainian government was not aware of a hold on U.S. security assistance at the time of the July 25 call.

    * Trump met with Zelenskiy and U.S. security assistance flowed to Ukraine in September 2019 — both of which occurred without Ukraine investigating Trump’s political rivals, the memo says.

    Commentary from Steve Benen:

    […] The first point is wrong, rejected by many Republicans, and oblivious to the fact that the scandal is about more than just Trump’s July 25 phone meeting with Zelensky. The second point has never made any sense. The third point has been debunked, as has the fourth.

    But other than that, it’s a great list of talking points.

    I probably shouldn’t be surprised, but I thought it was at least possible, given how many weeks Republicans have had to work on this, that the party would’ve come up with a more compelling list.

  325. says

    Today, Trump added Dreamers to his growing “no angels” category:

    Many of the people in DACA, no longer very young, are far from ‘angels.’ Some are very tough, hardened criminals. President Obama said he had no legal right to sign order, but would anyway. If Supreme Court remedies with overturn, a deal will be made with Dems for them to stay!

    Commentary:

    […] It was last month when Trump first admonished our Kurdish allies, arguing that they’re “no angels.” Evidently, as of this morning, he’s adding Dreamers to the same club.

    Putting that aside, let’s do a little fact checking. Are some of the Dreamers “hardened criminals”? No. As Trump really ought to know, immigrants with significant criminal records are not eligible for the DACA program. Did Barack Obama say he had no legal right to create DACA? No. Trump’s peddled this one before, and it’s plainly ridiculous.

    What I found especially entertaining, though, was what happens when we connect Trump’s second sentence with his fourth: the president seemed to argue this morning that some Dreamers are dangerous criminals, whom he’ll allow to remain in the United States if Democrats agree to give him what he wants.

    As for the terms of the “deal” Trump is eager to make, it’s worth remembering how important this detail is to the larger debate. He’s spent much of his presidency looking desperately for leverage over Democrats, whom Trump wants to force into giving him deep cuts to legal immigration, among other things.

    The president clearly knows that Democrats – who’ve offered the White House a series of bipartisan immigration packages, each of which Trump has rejected – won’t go along with such a far-right package, which is why he’s so eager to put Dreamers in jeopardy.

    Link

  326. says

    From the New York Times:

    The Trump administration is preparing to significantly limit the scientific and medical research that the government can use to determine public health regulations, overriding protests from scientists and physicians who say the new rule would undermine the scientific underpinnings of government policymaking.

    A new draft of the Environmental Protection Agency proposal, titled Strengthening Transparency in Regulatory Science, would require that scientists disclose all of their raw data, including confidential medical records, before the agency could consider an academic study’s conclusions. […]

    The measure would make it more difficult to enact new clean air and water rules because many studies detailing the links between pollution and disease rely on personal health information gathered under confidentiality agreements. And, unlike a version of the proposal that surfaced in early 2018, this one could apply retroactively to public health regulations already in place.

    From the American Lung Association’s Paul Billings:

    This means the E.P.A. can justify rolling back rules or failing to update rules based on the best information to protect public health and the environment, which means more dirty air and more premature deaths.

    From Emily Atkin:

    The EPA’s new science policy means the agency will no longer be able to create public health regulations based on the scientific consensus that air pollution kills people. I know that sounds like it can’t be true, but it extremely is.

    https://twitter.com/emorwee/status/1194226357460512768

  327. tomh says

    WaPo:
    Watergate hearings were a TV spectacle. Now veteran journalists are demanding PBS offer the same access.
    By Meagan Flynn
    November 11, 2019 at 4:17 a.m. PST

    For 51 nights in 1973, millions of people flipped on their televisions at 8 p.m. Eastern time to tune into the prime-time political soap opera brought to their living rooms from Capitol Hill — President Richard M. Nixon’s Watergate impeachment hearings.

    It was like “a kind of extended morality play,” as one of the nascent PBS’s news anchors described the network’s gavel-to-gavel coverage at the time. Viewers picked their heroes and villains in Watergate spies and insider White House witnesses, watching as the episodes of dramatic testimony on burglary and “dirty tricks” stretched well past midnight.

    But while the public broadcaster’s experiment in uninterrupted evening impeachment coverage was a wild success then, PBS won’t be doing it the same way for President Trump’s impeachment hearings this week — a decision that has incensed some of broadcast journalism’s most veteran reporters.

    On Friday, Bill Moyers, who worked for PBS during the Nixon era, and his colleague Michael Winship demanded in a New York Times full-page ad and in columns on Moyers’s website that PBS, “for the sake of the nation,” both broadcast the impeachment hearings live and replay them on prime-time television. PBS, the longtime journalists argued, could forgo its evening programs such as “Antiques Roadshow” as a “small price to pay for helping preserve the republic,” just as it famously did in 1973. The public hearings are set to begin Wednesday and are expected to be live-streamed by the major networks, but working Americans likely won’t get to watch them during the day, the journalists noted.

    “This is a moment in American history where the arc of justice will either be bent forward or it will be bent backward,” Moyers, who also served as President Lyndon B. Johnson’s press secretary, told CNN’s Brian Stelter on Sunday. “So everyone who wants to see it should have the chance to see the whole story.”

    PBS said Friday the network will broadcast live during the day but will then offer the hearings on-demand on its digital platforms. PBS WORLD, a digital channel carried by 157 public television stations representing about 64 percent of U.S. TV households, will also replay the hearings during prime time, ensuring that “Americans have access to the replay of the hearings when and how they want to view them,” a spokeswoman told The Washington Post.

    Moyers and Winship, however, were dissatisfied with the network’s plan, saying that without the prime-time rebroadcast on its most accessible channel, PBS’s efforts are not enough.

    “How in the world — no pun intended — does it serve democracy to hide the hearings from people who come home from work to see them but don’t have cable, satellite, and Internet access?” Moyers and Winship, a former PBS writer and now a senior writing fellow at Common Dreams, wrote in a column responding to PBS’s announcement. “If PBS were truly an alternative to corporate networks, it would repeat the hearings in prime time for the mass audience. Period.”

    Stretching back to President Andrew Johnson, impeachment hearings have always been a public spectacle. For Johnson’s impeachment trial, the U.S. Senate issued admission tickets as if it were a county fair. For President Bill Clinton’s hearings, salacious details traversed the Internet and trickled across cable news by the hour. But for Nixon, there was something new and wholly unfamiliar to American television viewers at the time: the opportunity to watch the hearings in their unfiltered entirety, from the couch with a bowl of popcorn — thanks to the young and emerging PBS.

    “The hearings showed Americans that democracy can work because they saw it at work,” Moyers and Winship wrote. “The coverage catapulted a fledgling PBS into the national consciousness. We know because we were there.”

    To even put on the wall-to-wall coverage was a risk. At the time, Nixon had it out for PBS, having recently vetoed a public-broadcasting funding bill that had many in the industry fearing he was bent on killing the government-funded news outlets altogether. Johnson had only just signed the Public Broadcasting Act a few years earlier. During the Nixon administration’s tirades against “Eastern liberal” public broadcasters, Moyers, in fact, saw his own program, “Bill Moyers’ Journal,” temporarily kicked off the air after a purge of numerous public affairs programs.

    But James Karayn, head of the now-defunct National Public Affairs Center for Television, insisted to superiors that airing the Nixon impeachment hearings was worth risking the administration’s wrath and gaining the public’s confidence. And finally, in the spring of 1973, his superiors and just over half of PBS member stations agreed. “We are doing this as an experiment,” news anchor Jim Lehrer said at the end of the first day’s hearings that May, “temporarily abandoning our ability to edit to give you the whole story, however many hours it may take.”

    From May to November 1973, the hearings aired for nearly 250 hours, which initially presented a funding challenge, according to the American Archive of Public Broadcasting.

    But as Karayn predicted, it was worth it, turning the Watergate hearings into a ratings and viewership boon for PBS. People became obsessed — “caught up in all this to a degree that might seem unlikely to anyone who didn’t experience it,” Charles McDowell Jr., a longtime Virginia-based journalist, said in a 1983 PBS documentary about the Watergate hearings. “Day after day, week after week, we watched the drama play out in one disclosure one after another.”

    Anchor Robert MacNeil likened the evening television broadcast to a Shakespearean tale, as “the forces hostile to the king are rising on all sides,” and as “messenger after messenger rushes in with bad news.”

    “But the decisive battle is still some scenes away, and we don’t yet know if this is a tragedy we are witnessing,” MacNeil said, according to the American Archive of Public Broadcasting.

    One viewer, June Wilson, wrote to PBS saying that since she began watching the evening rebroadcast, she had not even had time to finish sewing projects after work.

    “Since I work during the day I would be hard pressed to keep up with the testimony and nuances which undeniably show themselves in such a hearing,” she wrote. “Thus I arrive red-eyed and sleepy to work and don’t care.”

    Of course, as the summer wore on, viewers began to lose interest, and when the Senate Watergate Committee announced it was extending the hearings again in October, most PBS stations voted against continuing the gavel-to-gavel coverage, the American Archive of Public Broadcasting reported.

    But a PBS spokesman said at the time, “I think the whole public reaction simply indicates that if we can possibly do it, we are obligated to provide the coverage.”

    After PBS announced Friday that it would replay the impeachment hearings live broadcast on PBS WORLD and digital platforms, Moyers and Winship were flabbergasted as to why the network did not feel the same obligation now as it did then.

    The spokeswoman for PBS told The Post, as well as Moyers and Winship, that “we live in a vastly different media universe than we did 45-plus years ago,” one that is now an “on-demand world.”

    But the journalists argued the new media universe should not matter.

    “By thus failing to offer an alternative to the profit-hungry commercial networks in prime time, we suspect most Americans will miss the hearings in the day and at night many will go to their respective partisan corners on MSNBC or FOX,” they wrote.

  328. says

    Bill Moyers and writer Michael Winship paid for a full page ad in Friday’s New York Times, calling for PBS to air the impeachment proceedings in prime time.

    Over the course of 51 days and nights, millions of viewers watched as the story of the Watergate break-in, the cover-up, payoffs, and dirty tricks unfolded before their eyes. The evidence was undeniable: Richard Nixon, the President of the United States, had abused the power of his office, corrupted the rule of law, lied persistently, and obstructed justice.

    Other networks carried the hearings, too, but what set public broadcasting apart was the decision to air them twice a day: live, in real time as they happened, and then via videotape in prime time every evening, when people who had spent all day working could come home, watch the drama play out without intrusive commentary, and become a part of the process of judgement. One viewer wrote: “I arrive red-eyed and sleepy to work and I don’t care.”

    Our friends at PBS are saying they will not carry the hearings in prime time — period. Instead, they will throw them in the river and viewers can dive for it, because that’s what WORLD is, a place where important programs are sent to die. Raise your hand if you have ever found a show on World? How in the world — no pun intended — does it serve democracy to hide the hearings from people who come home from work to see them but don’t have cable, satellite, and internet access? If PBS were truly an alternative to corporate networks, it would repeat the hearings in prime time for the mass audience. Period.

    From Walter Einenkel:

    […] Moyers also remembered that the Nixon administration put a lot of pressure on the Public Broadcasting Service not to participate in showing the news, using a very familiar attack on the institution as being biased and trying to do away with all the funding that allowed PBS to do its work. With a plea to “contact your local public station or PBS directly,” Moyers and Winship remind PBS that you don’t make history without being an honest part of it. […]

    Speaking with Brian Stelter on CNN, Moyers said, “Our job as journalists is to slice and dice the events of the day as they occur or the day after, usually. But you don’t get the whole story there. If you wanted to get the whole story, the frame of the narrative of Watergate, you needed to watch the whole hearings. If you want to get the whole story of Trumpgate, you need to watch the whole hearings.” Moyers explained that while only 10% of the people might want to watch these hearings when they get home from a long day, those 10% deserve that easy access […]

    We all have many jobs in this life. But one of the jobs we all share is trying to maintain our integrity, as well as the integrity of our home and the institutions that offer us the hope of a free human race. […]

    Link

  329. says

    WASHINGTON (AP) _ Mick Mulvaney says he won’t sue over the House impeachment proceedings after all. It’s the latest reversal in position by Mulvaney, who last week asked to join the lawsuit of another Trump adviser before saying Monday that he intended to bring his own case.”

  330. tomh says

    Lynna @ #496
    It is outrageous. I remember watching those hearings, there had never been anything like it on TV. PBS is not the same, though, Moyers and his kind are gone.