#WomenInScience Day


Yesterday was Women and Girls in Science Day, which I only found out when it was almost over.

In the spirit of my work, here’s an article via The Atlantic, The History of Women in Science is Hidden in Plain Sight.

Over the last few years, a team of students led by Emilia Huerta-Sánchez from Brown University and Rori Rohlfs from San Francisco State University have been searching through two decades’ worth of acknowledgments in genetics papers and discovering women who were never given the credit that would be expected for today’s researchers. They identified dozens of female programmers who made important but unrecognized contributions. Some were repeatedly thanked in the acknowledgments of several papers, but were never recognized as authors. They became literal footnotes in scientific history, despite helping to make that history.

“When Emilia and I look at our elders in population genetics, there are very, very few women,” says Rohlfs. “But there were women and they were doing this work. To even know that they existed is a big deal to me.”

That seems to be the key – to even know that they existed. I know every time I find out about a woman in a field of science previously understood to be all male, I have Feelings, and it always feels like a big deal.

And I wish it wouldn’t.

Comments

  1. Nightjar says

    That was an interesting read. This sentence kind of says it all:

    Programmers, essentially, only became rewarded with authorship when they started becoming male.

    I was quite shocked when a few weeks ago I saw a guy on a TV quiz show that when faced with the question “who is credited as being the first programmer” and four options (three men and one woman) decided to discard Ada Lovelace right away because, and I quote, “that’s a female name”. *facepalm*

Leave a Reply