Unclear on the concept


Fox News carried out a phone survey to find out what people thought of god and science. Here are the results:

Which do you think is more likely to actually be the explanation for the origin of human life on Earth:

The theory of evolution as outlined by Darwin and other scientists 21%
The Biblical account of creation as told in the Bible, 45%
or Are both true? 27%
(Don’t know) 7%

It’s nothing at all surprising; a little less than half the American population typically answers these sorts of questions with dumb piety. The fact that a quarter are trying to claim compatibility is a little weird, but otherwise, whoop-de-do.

Ken Ham has commented on the results.

I’m sure many of you saw this poll. If it accurately represents the population in the USA, then why is evolution taught as fact in schools? Why do secularists have so much control over what is taught? I think there are a number of reasons and will comment later–but thought you would be interested to read this.

Somebody is unclear on the concept. Science is not determined by public opinion, and you don’t settle it by running a poll. Shall we vote on math, chemistry, physics, psychology, history, literature, and Spanish, too?

(Also on Sb)

Comments

  1. Blondin says

    Somebody is unclear on the concept. Science is not determined by public opinion, and you don’t settle it by running a poll. Shall we vote on math, chemistry, physics, psychology, history, literature, and Spanish, too?

    I bet Ken Ham didn’t really say that at all and PZ just screwed up a quote tag.

  2. Rev. BigDumbChimp says

    why is evolution taught as fact in schools? Why do secularists have so much control over what is taught?

    You tell ’em Hamster.

    Facts can always determined by polls.

  3. Blondin says

    Seriously though, it’s hard to believe there are actually people who would think that something must be true just because a majority of people believe it. How could he not understand the concept of a popular misconception? How could he possibly not understand that the majority could be wrong?

  4. Johan Fruh says

    Let’s try another poll:

    – God is an old man.

    – God is a rabbit.

    – Justin Bieber is God.

    It’ll be a tight match between 1) and 3), and then the christians will have to discuss about changing certain details in the bible…

  5. peterh says

    This seems to be a media moment on a platter for Kenny Boy, but he will “respond later.” Whatta maroon!

  6. jennyxyzzy says

    @Blondin,

    Go and read the facebook page. It’s not just Hammy-boy, he has *friends* that think that way too!

    Actually, reading those comments was just plain depressing, so maybe you should just skip clicking on the link…

  7. chigau () says

    If only I’d seen this sooner.
    I could have been the first to point out the blockquote fail.

  8. b00ger says

    I vote that 2 + 2 = 6. Oh and water is really gold. Man that’s gonna make me a lot of money.

  9. required says

    Ken Ham might notice that the combined “evolution is true” and “both are true” answers are greater than the “evolution is not true” answer. So maybe that’s why?

  10. Blondin says

    Can we have a poll on whether Ken Ham is a piglet rapist?

    I vote yes.

    Ken Ham rapes pigs,
    Ham rapes pink pigs,
    Ham rapes big pigs.
    I took a poll, I wrote a paper:
    Ken Ham is a pink pig, big pig raper.
    Ken Ham rapes his big pink pigs all day.
    (Don’t ask me why. I cannot say.)
    Ken rapes pigs where you can’t see ’em
    In his Ken Hams’ Pink Pigs Big Pigs Museum.

    Apologies to Dr Suess

  11. docslacker says

    Ummmm… evolution is taught in public schools because there is such an obvious and desperate need for adequate public education? Just sayin’

  12. keepscienceintexas says

    I clicked the provided link which took me to Ken Hams facebook page and read his sheeples comments. Very very sad.

  13. What a Maroon says

    Ooh, if we get to vote on Spanish, can we get rid of grammatical gender? (I know it’s not as difficult as in French or German or Ngan’gityemerri, but I don’t speak those languages regularly).

    Also, the le/la/lo distinction can go.

    But we’ll keep ser/estar and the subjunctive, ‘k?

  14. Blondin says

    I noticed some brave soul named Keith must have ‘friended’ Ham in order to insert some reality-based rebuttal. Go Keith!

  15. FossilFishy says

    Ah yes, the ever popular argumentum ad populum. So many use it that it must be a legitimate way to discover the truth.

  16. Zinc Avenger says

    This just in, Ken – reality is not American Idol. Facts are not determined by popular vote.

  17. Zinc Avenger says

    Also, Christians represent less than 50% of the world’s population. How come you preach that Christianity is true? The people have spoken, Ken!

  18. Brother Ogvorbis, Fully Defenestrated Emperor of Steam, Fire and Absurdity says

    Hammites really believe that belief determines reality? No wonder he and his elk were such huge supporters of the Bush misadministration.

  19. Gregory says

    If we are doing a poll, how about…

    Did Noah have two, and only two, of every animal on ark? 1) Yes 2) No

    Was man created before animals, or after?

    Questions like that. Then we can start asking why the Bible is being taught as inerrant truth.

  20. Brother Ogvorbis, Fully Defenestrated Emperor of Steam, Fire and Absurdity says

    er, all hail Tpyos? ‘Elk’ should be ‘ilk’. I did not mean to include those large, majestic (though weird sounding) ruminants in the same clade as Ham’s hamsters. Sorry to all elk who may be reading this.

  21. Kieran says

    I here the bible says the world is flat and fixed in space. Ham disagrees I think he should get his biblical glasses checked.

  22. Chris says

    I can actually feel my blood pressure climbing. I can’t take this sort of stupidity with any kind of equanimity. Its like reading the comments on CNN. Ever try it? Pure intellectual torture porn. Someone please help me.

  23. Keith says

    Someone is unclear on what a rigorous and valid survey looks like. At least if you want true public thought and not just a heard of sheep.

  24. eric says

    Ken Ham:

    If it accurately represents the population in the USA, then why is evolution taught as fact in schools?

    Because, Ken…

    For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled. – R. Feynman

  25. says

    Ye-es, that makes sense.
    And the fact that probably most people would vote “3” on the question “what’s the sum of ankles in a triangle?” should make us change that answer in maths test.
    Actually, if that poll shows anything it is that more evolution should be taught and that the government should make sure that all children get the chance to a propper education regardless of their parents’ superstitions.

  26. says

    Hammy left us a teaser to get us to come back, and read about his thoughts. as if I give a shit.
    Rebecca Black thinks Justin Bieber is awesome. She said that in a video.

  27. Mr Ed says

    If it accurately represents the population in the USA, then why is evolution taught as fact in schools?

    I know that gravity is a property of mass, I also know that scientists have yet to find a piratical to explain mass. So I make this modest proposal, we as a country come to the consensus that gravity is just theory. This will allow us to improve our economy by becoming the world leader in launching satellites and people into orbit as we will no longer have to take gravity into consideration.

  28. Bodach says

    I say we vote on math. Give everything the value of zero and I can finally do all manner of equations. Maybe I will finally get a Doctorate!

  29. Jayaram says

    Why don’t we extend Ken Ham’s logic further? Take a poll involving all the folks around the world about the need for Christianity. I’m sure the non-christian majority (Chinese and Indians) would vote Christianity out and at least one religion would be out of counting…

  30. says

    I’m sure many of you saw this poll. If it accurately represents the population in the USA, then why is evolution taught as fact in schools?

    IOW, if around half of the population is too ignorant and/or biased to get basic science right, by no means should they be taught basic science.

    Yes, failure of scientific comprehension by the student compels us not to teach good science.

    Glen Davidson

  31. Guillermo Lopez says

    From that poll, the mayoralty say that Evolution is fact. At least that’s what I can tell from the contradicting 3rd option that has 27%.

  32. Erulóra Maikalambe says

    If it accurately represents the population in the USA, then why is evolution taught as fact in schools?

    Because, unfortunately, it accurately represents the population in the USA.

  33. cyanidesin says

    It really upsets me when things like this give the rest of the world such a valid reason to laugh at us. I mean, seriously? It amazes me that evolution is even still debatable at all. And with extreme Christians building creation museums to explain dinosaurs or claiming Satan planted all the bones as a freaking test of the faithful, it gets more and more depressing all the time. How, in such a fast-paced, modern world, are so many people more delusional and misguided than ancient Greeks and Romans were? We have insanely advanced technology compared to them, and yet they understood that their gods were ideas, lessons, examples of moral integrity and deficiency. The only people who really believed would have been uneducated, backwoods farmers and peasants who…OH. OH, I SEE. It’s suddenly all so clear.

  34. la pedante says

    strictly speaking, if you decided what was spanish by giving spanish people a vote on it then it would be valid.

    pz shouldn’t be such as appeaser by giving implying the same level of truth-value in other faculties such as the arts and languages. if the main focus of study is knowledge and truth then it is called science.

  35. keepscienceintexas says

    There appears to be a battle brewing on Ken Hams facebook page. Those making a sound argument and those responding with lalalalala I can’t hear you.

  36. Pierce R. Butler says

    Johan Fruh @ # 9: … are we allowed to mention Justin Bieber on this blog?

    It depends. Is he a l*b*rt*r**n?

  37. says

    I post about the Science & Engineering Indicators every time the NSF puts them out. Here’s another interesting ‘fact’ we’d be teaching if we based science education on popular opinion :

    -Lasers work by focusing sound waves.

    If public opinion shifts just a bit, we might also be teaching:

    -Electrons are larger than atoms.
    -Antibiotics kill viruses as well as bacteria.
    -The Sun goes around the Earth.

    Just for comparison, Europeans do worse on average compared to Americans on these questions, so Europe would be teaching all of the above as fact except for the Sun going around the Earth.

  38. Aquaria says

    How, in such a fast-paced, modern world, are so many people more delusional and misguided than ancient Greeks and Romans were?

    They’re misguided because it is a fast-paced, modern world, and they can’t keep up. For some, it’s because they’re so poorly educated that they can’t. But most of them are just too fucking stupid to get it.

    Remember, 100 is the average IQ. Half the population is below that. And I’d wager that christards make up more than their share of the sub-100 crowd.

  39. Aquaria says

    Also, the christards fear/resent change.

    Being fearful or resistant to change is a feature, not a bug, with religion.

  40. Dianne says

    But we’ll keep ser/estar and the subjunctive, ‘k?

    Only if we can add it to English. I think estar would be a fine addition to the English language. Along with se me (te) olvido. (Literally, “It was forgotten by me (you).” The English construction is too blaming.

  41. What a Maroon says

    strictly speaking, if you decided what was spanish by giving spanish people a vote on it then it would be valid.

    Why only the Spanish people? Shouldn’t Mexicans, Argentinians, etc., have a say?

    And if the majority of speakers says that, say, vos is not Spanish, does that make it so?

    There is a science of language, and what it says about language and languages doesn’t necessarily reflect popular opinion (and I will grant you that linguists are not nearly as united about theory as, e.g., biologists).

  42. daveau says

    I believe that Hydrogen has two electrons. If I can get a bunch of people to agree, then I win! Right?

  43. What a Maroon says

    Only if we can add it to English. I think estar would be a fine addition to the English language. Along with se me (te) olvido. (Literally, “It was forgotten by me (you).” The English construction is too blaming.

    I stand in agreement with you.

  44. teawithbertrand says

    What’s up with the “both are true” option? Why would they include this? Just to make it more confusing for people?

    2 + 2 = ?

    A. 4
    B. 5
    C. Both 4 and 5

    And only 21% got it right. There’s the answer to your question, Hambone.

  45. says

    Try this Poll in the US:

    1. Do you believe that the Hindu creation mythology should be taught in public schools as the true story of creation?

    [estimated results 94% will say NO]

    2. Do you believe that the scientific theories taught in public school science classes should be the those theories most accepted by the experts in each field?

    [estimated results 94% will say YES]

    3. Is the modern biological theory of evolutionary the most widely accepted scientific theory among Biologists?

    [estimated results 80% will say YES]

    Assuming these results, we could conclude that the vast majority of Americans are against teaching false creation myths in school and are overwhelming behind teaching the scientific theory of evolution.

    Or you could note that poll results are often prejudicial, manipulated by wording, question order, biases in polling methodology [can you say pharyngulated? I knew you could], etc.

  46. claimthehighground says

    We don’t need a popular vote on these things when the bible is right there to guide us in things mathematical. Now let’s all turn to 2nd Chronicles 4:2 where we read, King Solomon…made a tub of cast bronze, 10 cubits from one brim to the other; it was completely round…and a line of 30 cubits measured its circumference.

    Therefore Pi = 3.

    All together now (singing), How do I know, the bible tells me so.

  47. steven says

    I finally figured out why right-wing Christians do not want ‘Evolution’ taught in public schools. Students would have to learn bad words such as HOMO SAPIENS, HOMO HABILIS and God forbid HOMO ERECTUS. As we all know, even thinking about those words will eventually turn every student into at least one of the above.

  48. Pancho says

    @31

    That’s actually a tricky question. Most people would reply “six”, but amputations and malformations result in some triangles having less (or, in really wierd cases, more) than six ankles.

  49. Alex says

    Possibly the most amusing thing about this is that when you mention the scientific consensus on evolution to a creationist, they’ll most likely say that truth isn’t decided by popular opinion. Perhaps truth is only decided by popular opinion when its also their opinion?

  50. a_ray_in_dilbert_space says

    Another suggestion for additions to English:

    Indonesian has two words for “we”. One includes the person you are speaking to, while the other makes it clear you are referring to people not including the person to whom you are speaking.

  51. skmarshall says

    I’ll wager if you asked a random sampling of Americans “what is 7 times 8?” there would be enough variation in the answers to support “Teaching the Controversy” in math class.

  52. brianwestley says

    And now, let’s take a minute to explain the rules to “Common Knowledge”. Questions for our show are show are selected by educators from Princeton University to express a broad range of common knowledge that every American should possess. Answers for “Common Knowledge” are determined by a nationwide survey of 17-year-old high school seniors.

    http://www.nbc.com/saturday-night-live/video/common-knowledge/2879/

    That’s “Common Knowledge”. And remember: It’s not what you know, but what you think you know! Good night, everyone!

  53. says

    They vote on these things in Texas. Just think how much history, math, chemistry, and physics could be simplified. Of course we already know that biology benefits by letting the general population decide what will be taught. Perhaps the field of medicine could stand to gain substantially through this process.

  54. says

    Literature poll!

    Which do you think is a more likely accurate account of reality:

    -The Bible
    -The Harry Potter books
    -The nutritional information on the back of a jar of peanut butter

  55. clarysage says

    Come on, people! It’s “se me olvidó”! You need the accent mark! Or shall we vote on eliminating diacritical marks in foreign languages too?

  56. tim Rowledge says

    I know that gravity is a property of mass, I also know that scientists have yet to find a piratical to explain mass

    What’s that, ye scurvy dog? D’ye not know Newtons equation?

    F = G.m1.m2 over Aaaarrr! squared.

    Sounds pretty piratical to me, matey.

    Okay, okay, we’re a little early for speak like a pirate day but when is it ever not a good idea anyway? At least pirates don’t rape piglets.

  57. Crimbly says

    I’ve just read through a few of the comment threads on the linked page.

    The wilful ignorance of most of the posters is… awesome. Utterly mindblowing. I’d just watched that “climbing tower” video posted by PZ above, and then read the above-linked comments, and I honestly got sweatier palms reading the comments.

  58. peterh says

    “…Students would have to learn bad words such as HOMO SAPIENS, HOMO HABILIS and God forbid HOMO ERECTUS. As we all know, even thinking about those words will eventually turn every student into at least one of the above.”

    Um . . . they already ARE at least one of the above. Or most of them, anyway.

  59. BCskeptic says

    Fuckin’ moron!

    To think that that 47% votes for the person who has his/her finger on the nuclear button, truly makes my blood run cold.

    Pharyngula, and all of the comments are great fun to read while rolling on the floor in laughter.

    But it is really serious shit going on, and is why science education and calling idiots idiots is so important. We must never forget that.

    Thanks, PZ.

  60. StevoR says

    @15. Blondin : 8 September 2011 at 8:35 am

    Can we have a poll on whether Ken Ham is a piglet rapist? I vote yes. [Me too -ed.]
    Ken Ham rapes pigs,
    Ham rapes pink pigs,
    Ham rapes big pigs.
    I took a poll, I wrote a paper:
    Ken Ham is a pink pig, big pig raper.
    Ken Ham rapes his big pink pigs all day.
    (Don’t ask me why. I cannot say.)
    Ken rapes pigs where you can’t see ‘em
    In his Ken Hams’ Pink Pigs Big Pigs Museum.
    Apologies to Dr Suess

    I do not like pigs and Ken Ham
    I do not like the Creation scam
    I do not like it in my school
    I do not like to see him drool

    I do not want the piglets raped
    Or evolution denied – like Perry taped
    I do not want Ken Ham’s theme park
    I don’t believe in silly arks!

    I do not want Ken Ham to lie
    Evlutions truth he can’t deny
    I do not want him in my books
    We do not need creationist crooks!

    I do not want Ken Ham that guy,
    Oh, not the one who makes the Shuttle fly
    I do not want him on the net
    Six thousand years is not the bet!

    I do not want Ken Ham at all
    I do want to see Creationism mauled! ;-)

    Hmm .. apologies to Dr Suess also. Y’all feel free to forward on and quote elsewhere if y’think it helps at all preferably properly attributed.

    Is there a best anti-creationist parody prize of some sort here? :-)

  61. StevoR says

    @69. Therrin :

    But but but, Galileo!

    Er ..what about the NASA-JPL spaceprobe?

    It did make some interesting discoveries around Jupiter during its operational life but how’s that relevant? ;-)

  62. StevoR says

    Couple of corrections for draft II of that :

    Make the first verse / couplet :

    I do not like arks and Ken Ham
    I do not like the Creation scam

    & the last one :

    I do not want Ken Ham at all
    I’d like to see PZ, Ham maul!

    I reckon that makes it work better, yes?

  63. Teg says

    May I suggest (or hope, anyway) that perhaps, this being Faux News, there might be a bit of a selection bias?

  64. pa747sp says

    Wasn’t there a recent poll that suggested that fundies were the most hated minority in America? In that case, why are they allowed to remain?

  65. abb3w says

    I’d disagree with the It’s nothing at all surprising; for a “theory of evolution as outlined by Darwin and other scientists” (and God need not apply) type response, 21% is a suprisingly high number; compare typical Gallup results.

    Of course, there’s some variance due to phrasing; the Fox-1999 poll was also about five percentage points higher than the Gallup-1999 numbers. Still, while the glass may be mostly empty, at least the trend is in a helpful direction.

  66. ichthyic says

    A Pigfucker sez:

    I’m sure many of you saw this poll. If it accurately represents the population in the USA, then why is evolution taught as fact in schools?

    shorter Hammster:

    If people are ignorant, why should we teach them?

    *headdesk*

  67. ichthyic says

    Which do you think is a more likely accurate account of reality:

    -The Bible
    -The Harry Potter books
    -The nutritional information on the back of a jar of peanut butter

    Was is it your intention to make it a tough choice?

    where’s the “none of the above” option?

  68. ichthyic says

    ike other tyrannies, the tyranny of the majority was at first, and is still vulgarly, held in dread, chiefly as operating through the acts of the public authorities. But reflecting persons perceived that when society is itself the tyrant — society collectively over the separate individuals who compose it — its means of tyrannizing are not restricted to the acts which it may do by the hands of its political functionaries. Society can and does execute its own mandates; and if it issues wrong mandates instead of right, or any mandates at all in things with which it ought not to meddle, it practices a social tyranny more formidable than many kinds of political oppression, since, though not usually upheld by such extreme penalties, it leaves fewer means of escape, penetrating much more deeply into the details of life, and enslaving the soul itself. Protection, therefore, against the tyranny of the magistrate is not enough; there needs protection also against the tyranny of the prevailing opinion and feeling, against the tendency of society to impose, by other means than civil penalties, its own ideas and practices as rules of conduct on those who dissent from them; to fetter the development and, if possible, prevent the formation of any individuality not in harmony with its ways, and compel all characters to fashion themselves upon the model of its own. There is a limit to the legitimate interference of collective opinion with individual independence; and to find that limit, and maintain it against encroachment, is as indispensable to a good condition of human affairs as protection against political despotism.

    -JSM

    and something added by Noam Chomsky…

    I have often thought that if a rational Fascist dictatorship were to exist, then it would choose the American system.