And I don’t want to hear you say otherwise. We don’t celebrate greedy genocidal monsters around these here parts, we honor the people who lived on this land.
For the third year running, a U.S. president has officially recognized Indigenous Peoples’ Day.
President Biden issued a proclamation on Friday to observe Monday, Oct. 9, as a day to honor Native Americans, their “resilience, strength, and perseverance” and “determination to preserve cultures, identities, and ways of life,” even as they have faced “violence and devastation,” he said.
Respect to indigenous peoples of the Americas.
By coincidence, we’re about to have a referendum in Australia to add an indigenous voice to parliament.
Referendum on an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice | National Indigenous Australians Agency
https://www.niaa.gov.au/indigenous-affairs/referendum-aboriginal-and-torres-strait-islander-voice
And yet, people still say it’s Columbus day, unfortunately. Even me, admittedly.
Some people have become more enlightened and celebrate Indigenous Peoples’ Day. But . . .
Oh, crap! The u.s. gov’t is still celebrating columbus: http://forecast.weather.gov/ . And, I’m sure the Corrupt Catholic Corporation still venerates him.
Any native speaker (of English) care to explain the use of the possesive apostrophy? What is wrong with “Indigenous Peoples Day” without the apostrophy? Was it ever “Columbus’ Day,” with an apostrophy? Curious non-native wants to know.
possessive
Here in Canada, it’s Thanksgiving day, although my wife’s family always celebrates on Sunday. We had our National Day of Truth and Reconciliation on September 30.
Actually…it’s Indigenous Peoples Day Observed. What it really is, is Leif Erikson Day.
I’m somewhat reluctant to use the phrase “Indigenous Peoples Day” because I know I’m going to run into a right wing asshole who will INSIST on calling it “Columbus Day.”
Chances are, that right-wing asshole is going to be my father.
Akira, is there even a single issue with which you agree with your father? You two seem to be polar opposites just going by everything you’ve written over the years.
@9 René – You have in the past shown you are quite fluent in English. But, English (both British and that spoken in the U.S.) is a muddled language at best, derive from many other root languages and then mixed up by all sorts of weird usage over time. If I remember correctly, “Indigenous People” refers to one group of people (perhaps many from one tribe), “Indigenous Peoples” refers to many groups of people (perhaps many people from many different tribes). Therefore, “Indigenous Peoples’ Day” refers to the “plural possessive”: indicating a day that is in honor of many groups of people. I’m only half-awake, I hope that was somewhat clear and correct.
@ 9
Why should there be?
Rene, #4,
My guess is that the important bit is that the apostrophe comes after the “s” – i.e. to emphasise that “Indigenous People” is plural.
It’s not just a day to celebrate some inchoate mass of “Indigenous People”, but recognises that the different peoples of the pre-colonisation American continents were distinct, diverse and culturally vibrant societies, and those that remain still are.
This is not really possible to clarify in English apart from with a tactical apostrophe.
Regarding tactical apostrophe, René raises the question whether marking the possessive is necessary in the first place. At least when it comes to days dedicated to persons, like the old war criminal Columbus, the seems to be a convention of not marking the possessive.
One time on Twitter, there was confused discussion on whether the correct form is “mother’s day” or “mothers’ day”. I don’t remember offhand which it is, but I recall it’s definitely not “mothers day”.
…there seems to be a convention…
Fun coincidence: I just learned the revised dating for when people came to the Americas has been confirmed.
It is 7000 years earlier than previous assumptions, which puts the arrival of proto-Indians more than 20,000 years ago.
Sadly, this arrival began the pattern of extinctions which culminated with the arrival of Europeans and continues today. Humans and a diverse nature do not mix.
Whheydt @ 7
Yeah, he gets all the credit for what Eric the Red found.
And before Columbus, there was a Chinese admiral that reached Mexico (they mentioned tequila in their records- an alcohol beverage made “from trees”).
OT
The infinite thread seems to be at a close, so I will just post it here.
“Skepticrat 210: Motion To Staycare Edition”
https://youtu.be/_WfIiGwhh18
or possibly
https://youtu.be/_WfliGwhh18
Typo: Should be “Motion to staycrate”.
Anyone who gets a heartfelt welcome by an indigenous group and decides this makes them perfect as slaves is a special POS.
Yep we must support Indigenous people like the Palestinians. Oh wait!
birgerjohansson @15
That is not news to North American archaeologists and South American archaeologists.
birgerjohansson @16
That whole “Chinese in the Americas” thing is utter bollocks.
@#8 , Akira you’ve got my sympathy. My father was a raging homophobe and misogynist who hated people of his own race! I don’t agree with most of what he believed either . The only thing that man got right was his contempt for American education standards . They really are pathetic especially with science, civics and history
@ 22
Thank you. For me the problem is that even though he is 75 years old. He fucking terrifies me. He has a very short temper. If I wasn’t financially hopeless and a irresponsible basketcase, I’d move out.
Of course, we’ve just had a huge and disgraceful set back here in Australia for our Indigenous Peoples where disinformation, lies and racism have won out and the non-binding advisory Voice to parliament has been voted down :
https://www.abc.net.au/news/voice-to-parliament-referendum
Also :
Source : https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-10-17/voice-referendum-infected-disinformation-australians-lies/102981108
A statement from Indigenous Supporters of the Voice – the overwhelming majority of them – here :
Source : https://ulurustatement.org/a-statement-from-indigenous-australians-who-supported-the-voice-referendum/