Another type of post to add to the rotay, so I don’t run out of birdposts and dreamposts and discposts: Thunks I Stole from My Husband, aka Brainjackin’. These won’t necessarily all be original thoughts or observations of his, run thru the filter of my misunderstanding. Sometimes it will just be Things I Wouldn’t Know About if It Weren’t for Him. Like this post, about Abbott Handerson Thayer’s hot idea.
OK, this idea might have crossed my horizon before, but it didn’t take root in my memory until my husband mentioned it to me one random evening. Early 20th century painter Abbott Handerson Thayer was very successful in his own time, a man of letters as well as visual art. Seems like everybody had to have big opinions about everything, and he put forth an idea on the topic of zoology, which may have been a good example of people talking outside their expertise. According to Thayer, even boldly colored animals were actually adapted for camouflage. After all, predator or prey, you have good reasons to wish to remain unseen.
In support of this idea, he used his exceptional painting skills to illustrate a book. Very beautiful pictures of not-at-all cryptic (camouflaged) animals, in just the right circumstance that they could fade into a background. Por ejemplo,

I think this guy was more famous for paintings of pretty girls, but this stuff is a lil more memorable in the scheme of things. At least, to me. Were peacocks adapted to blend in with bushes and trees? Probably not, but the idea was at least good for producing some very cool art. Thank you, Hander Thaybotson Randers. Aw shit, I’m losing it already…
–
