Here we go again – another cutely-named voting group

In every election, political consultants love to come up with a new demographic group with some cute identifier that they signal will be THE swing group whose votes will determine the outcome, and the media promptly latches on it it. Sometimes these groups consist of women. Remember the ‘soccer moms’ phase?

Well, we have a new entry for this election cycle: the ‘weighted vest moms’, which consists of (I kid you not) women wearing weighted vests as they walk around or jog or otherwise exercise. This is apparently the latest fitness fad promoted by TikTok influencers and others such as Gwyneth Paltrow. (That last piece of information alone should give you pause.)
[Read more…]

Eddie Izzard on the Daleks

Based on my personal experience, there seems to a correlation between skeptical thinking and science fiction. I attend functions of a group of skeptics, sometimes physically at local venues, and at other times online with people around the world and I find that a large number of them are aficionados of science fiction and are knowledgeable about the minutiae of those stories.

Recently I created some mild astonishment within this group by saying that I had never actually watched any complete episodes of favorites like Star Trek, The Twilight Zone, or Dr. Who. I knew about them of course and had read about them and seen the odd clip of something from them. It is not that I avoid them. I do read the occasional science fiction but had never had any great interest in seeing science fiction on TV or the big screen. This surprised others who seemed to expect that with my science background, I would find them appealing.

One thing that had always puzzled me were the Daleks, the evildoers in the Dr. Who stories. They seemed to me to be laughably comical and totally not frightening. Eddie Izzard shares my puzzlement as to what the creators were thinking when they created them as conical objects with flat bottoms, like pepper and salt shakers, who moved on wheels and had weird appendages where arms would be.

Living in an alternate reality

Joseph Ladapo is the surgeon general for the state of Florida and is a vaccine skeptic who recently announced plans to abolish all mandates that requires parents to vaccinate their children against preventable diseases such as measles, mumps, chickenpox, polio, and hepatitis, comparing such mandates to slavery. He also opposes gender-affirming care and counseling for transgender and nonbinary minors. He is a good example of how an education obtained at elite institutions (he obtained his undergraduate degree from Wake Forest and his MD and PhD from Harvard) does not mean that one cannot hold unscientific views. He has been publicly rebuked by the CDC and FDA for spreading scientific misinformation.

But extreme as his views are, they are nowhere close to those of his wife Brianna who is described as an “intuitive spiritual healer, movement therapist, and teacher”.
[Read more…]

The dumb blonde stereotype

While idly surfing the internet, I came across an item that began “This reminds me of the joke of two blondes sunbathing in Missouri.” I immediately knew that the ‘joke’ would be based on the stereotype of blonde women being stupid and/or ignorant. And sure enough, here is the full item.

This reminds me of the joke of two blondes sunbathing in Missouri. One of them looks up and sees the faint outline of the Moon in the blue sky.

One asks the other, ”Which is closer, the Moon or Florida?”

“Obviously the Moon. Can you see Florida from here?”

[Read more…]

The ‘cold plunge’ fallacy

From the time we are children, we are often told that we need to do something that we do not want to because it is good for us. The most obvious things are taking medicines and eating vegetables. That advice is undoubtedly correct. But that may subtly breed the erroneous idea that the fact that something is distasteful to eat or do may in iitself be an indicator that it is good for us. Often these things involve actions that people we know tell us about or that we read about famous and successful people doing.

Jonny Thomson spoke with neuroscientist Rachel Barr about this ‘cold plunge fallacy’ that has led to many fads that may be merely making life unpleasant for us without any benefits, or where the benefits may be outweighed by the negatives of the experience, or that may even be harmful.
[Read more…]

The abundant availability of health data

As I mentioned in an earlier post, I am locked into the Apple ecosystem. The latest addition was the Apple Watch. I had not considered buying one since I had an excellent analog wristwatch that kept perfect time and was powered by light and thus did not require any batteries. As long as you did not keep it in darkness such as put away in a drawer, it kept perfect time. I had had it for over a decade with no problems, so never felt the need to get another watch.

But since I live mostly alone, my daughters were concerned about me falling and not being able to call for help so they bought an Apple Watch for me because it has the feature that if you do have a hard fall, it detects it and will alert you. If you do not cancel the alert and are immobile for a minute, it will call 911 emergency services and your emergency contacts and send your GPS location to them. It will also send any medical information, such as the medications you are on, allergies, and any other health information you wish to share.
[Read more…]

The corrosive spread of tech company mentality

One of the aphorisms guiding tech companies is to ‘move fast and break things’. Rewards accrue to those companies that are first out of the gate with something new and so products are rushed out without being fully tested, the assumption being that any faults can be corrected based on feedback from consumers. In other words, the people who buy the early versions of the product serve as so-called beta testers, whether they want to be or not.

These situations rarely have life-or-death consequences. With most things such as devices and apps, usually the worst that can happen is that the users are annoyed or frustrated with the glitches but are willing to tolerate them as long as they get upgrades that purportedly take care of the problems.

But there is now an increasing area where tech-based products are being marketed as solutions for things where that tech culture attitude is not suitable, with sometimes dangerous consequences. I wrote recently about AI systems being used to try and treat the problem of loneliness by acting essentially as therapists, sometimes giving dangerous advice out of misguided attempts at being supportive. This can have tragic real-world consequence such as one case where a ChatGPT chatbot urged a teen to kill himself. The family is now suing Open AI, creator of ChatGPT.
[Read more…]

The horrifying revelations in The Tesla Files

The Tesla company is very secretive about the cars it produces. In particular, it is very reluctant to release information about their safety records. While the company blocks attempts to release records on its crash records, a whistleblower has released what is being called The Tesla files based on internal records. The Guardian has released an edited extract from The Tesla Files by Sönke Iwersen and Michael Verfürden that was published on 24 July that reveals horrifying details about the kinds of crashes that Teslas have been involved in and how that information is suppressed. The article says that what the files reveal is that it is perfectly reasonable to be mortally afraid of these cars.

The most disturbing thing that I read was that Tesla collects vats amount of real-time data from its cars all over the world but the existence of this data was being kept secret from regulators. When any of the cars crash, this data would be invaluable to investigators looking for the cause but many do not ask for it, presumably because they are unaware that the data exist and even when they ask, the company stonewalls, leaving the victims of the crashes and their families frustrated.
[Read more…]

The desire of the wealthy to live forever

The August 11, 2025 issue of The New Yorker has a fascinating article by Tad Friend titled How to Live Forever and Get Rich Doing It on the huge amounts of money swirling around the efforts by some to lengthen their lives and even to reverse the aging process. This is a small community of billionaires who are willing to invest huge amounts of money on research into the aging process so that they might become immortal or at least increase their lifespans considerably. Naturally, this has spawned an industry of researchers who cater to this need because of the money available.

And these rich people, labeled biohackers, are willing to go to great lengths to increase their own lives. The article profiles one Peter Diamandis who can be considered an evangelist for this cause. His shtick is to get rich people to give huge amounts of money to create competitions that offer massive prizes under the umbrella category of XPRIZE for breakthroughs in longevity research and methods.

His promise is essentially a world in which you can blithely marry someone forty years younger than you, continue to have children even as your grandchildren are having children of their own, and keep your gaze trained on the farthest horizons—in which you can stick around to witness, and even determine, where humanity goes next.
[Read more…]

Is there a middle ground between atheism and theism?

To me the answer is ‘no’ but the title of this post was suggested by this essay by Philip Goff, a professor of philosophy, who clearly wants to find one. The subheading says, “Neither atheism nor theism adequately explains reality. That is why we must consider the middle ground between the two.”

Goff says that he was brought up as a Catholic but started identifying himself as an atheist at the age of 14 and was comfortable with it for about two decades. Then about five years ago, he had to teach a course on the philosophy of religion that required him to present the arguments for and against God. In doing so he says that he found the arguments for God “incredibly compelling too! In particular, the argument from the fine-tuning of physics for life couldn’t be responded to as easily as I had previously thought.”

A few weeks into this existential morass I was peacefully watching some ducks quack in a nearby nature reserve, when I suddenly realised there was a startingly simple and obvious solution to my dilemma. The two arguments I was finding compelling – the fine-tuning argument for ‘God’, and the argument from evil and suffering against ‘God’ – were not actually opposed to each other. The argument from evil and suffering targets a very specific kind of God, namely the Omni-God: all-knowing, all-powerful, perfectly good creator of the universe. Meanwhile, the fine-tuning argument supports something much more generic, some kind of cosmic purpose or goal-directedness towards life that might not be attached to a supernatural designer. So if you go for cosmic purpose but not one rooted in the desires of an Omni-God, then you can have your cake and eat it by accepting both arguments.

And thus my worldview was radically changed.
[Read more…]