How Joe Biden enabled Israel’s war crimes

One of the most disgusting things about the Biden administration was his steadfast refusal to condemn Israel’s horrific genocidal behavior in Gaza. Kamala Harris’s refusal to distance herself from that policy when she became the Democratic nominee, and the Democratic Party establishment’s condoning of the genocide, was one of the factors that led to a lack of support for her, especially among the progressives and the young, and led to the poor performance in the 2024 elections.

David Kirkpatrick writes about how Biden ignored the plea of Mirjana Spoljaric, the president of the International Committee of the Red Cross, that Israel was egregiously violating human rights and asking him to do something.

Allowing the Red Cross to visit detainees during a war or an occupation is one of the brightest lines established by the Geneva Conventions. Yet, after October 7th, Israel, for perhaps the first time in its history, fully blocked the organization’s access to Palestinian detainees from Gaza and the West Bank, putting it in the company of pariah states such as North Korea and Eritrea; even the warring factions in Yemen allowed Red Cross visits. Spoljaric noted that humanitarian groups and journalists had reported a “massive surge” in the number of Palestinians in Israeli prisons. At least a thousand had been released back into Gaza, and many of them gave accounts of torture, even though the Israeli military had concluded that they were not Hamas fighters. The Times reported that one released detainee, a law student named Fadi Bakr, described being beaten so severely that his genitals turned blue and blood still appeared in his urine weeks later. He said that Israeli guards had played music so loudly that one of his ears bled.

Of course, Biden did nothing, other that making weak appeals for restraint to Israeli prime minister and war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu to not do anything extreme, which he completely ignored, so confident was he of unquestioned US support.
[Read more…]

Will Trump step in to rescue the Tates?

Andrew Tate and his brother Tristan represent some of the worst elements of the so-called manosphere, the world of pathetic young male losers who think that by improving their looks and adopting an aggressive macho posturing, wealth will flow to them, and that this will attract women whom they can abuse. This makes them prime targets for influencers who exploit them by telling them that their problems are because the world is controlled by a secretive cabal who keep them down, and offer them courses and dubious investment opportunities that they promise will enable them to become wealthy and break their shackles and make their dreams come true, but in fact only impoverishes them further. Louis Theroux’s documentary Inside the Manosphere that I reviewed here went inside that world and revealed its misogyny, homophobia, racism, and anti-semitism in all its ugliness.

The British-American Tates were arrested on Saturday and held in Miami after being charged by UK authorities with rape and sex-trafficking charges and an extradition request has been issued.

Britain’s Crown Prosecution Service said the new charges relate to four further victims and were brought after authorities received evidence from Bedfordshire Police in southeastern England. The charges include rape, assault, trafficking and offenses relating to “indecent images of a child and extreme pornography.”

The charges announced Saturday, which bring the total number of alleged victims in the U.K. to seven, are the latest in a long-running international legal saga involving the brothers that has spanned the U.S., Britain and Romania. The brothers have denied wrongdoing.

[Read more…]

Count Binface is on a roll in the UK

It is quite extraordinary how Count Binface emerging as the main opponent to Nigel Farage in the Clacton by-election on August 13 has thrown politics and media coverage into a turmoil with people struggling to figure out how to respond.

There are those who positively hate Farage and are relishing the prospect of him having to campaign against someone who was known as a novelty candidate but in this election is emerging as a serious threat. This has resulted in his supporters angrily denouncing Binface’s candidacy as a stunt (which nobody denies) and accusing the mainstream political parties of being behind him, even though it is clear that their decision to boycott the election was because they saw Farage’s resignation as as a stunt and Binface stepping in to fill the vacuum and emerging as a serious candidate something that they had little to do with.

The media are also nonplussed. On the one hand, there are those who are enjoying the comedic aspects of the whole thing, allowing them to interview Binface on show after show, thus increasing his visibility even more.

Then there are others who are tut-tutting, saying that it makes a mockery of democracy. It is not clear why that claim makes any sense. We have an election in which candidates could freely contest and some have chosen to do so. One of them is a candidate in a space suit that has a trash bin on his head. But he has stood in many elections before. It is Farage who created this situation by resigning so he cannot blame anyone else for not contesting.

Here in Binface appearing on the BBC TV show Newsnight where the host was clearly in the tut-tut camp but the other panelists were not.

Although Farage remains the favorite to win, the odds of him winning are getting worse by the day. National opinion polls may not help much in anticipating the outcome of this election since the voters who actually live in Clacton may be torn. Even if they hate Farege and would happily vote for any of the major political parties, they may hesitate to vote to elect Binface as their MP for fear of having their constituency seen as a joke and thus may sit it out. That may the biggest factor favoring Farage.

The Lincoln Pool is a metaphor for the Trump presidency

The algae-infested Lincoln Pool in Washington DC has been drained and it appears that the base of the pool, far from being the vivid blue color that Trump touted, now appears to nowhere close to that, being instead a blotchy gray color. Trump appears to be sensitive to how bad the pool looks and so a dark fence now surrounds it to prevent people from getting a close look at the disaster. But a photographer for the Associated Press got an aerial shot from the top of the Washington Monument. Follow the above link to see how awful it looks.

The newly drained Lincoln Memorial reflecting pool’s bottom surface has noticeably faded since it was lined with a protective coating in a color Donald Trump called “American flag blue” this spring.

An Associated Press reporter and photographer viewed the fenced-off reflecting pool on Wednesday from the top of the Washington Monument. The new liner appears grayer than when the pool was repainted and refilled with water in early June. Debris that had been visible earlier this week after the pool was drained is now largely gone, after work crews removed it.
…

The interior secretary, Doug Burgum, whose agency oversees the National Park Service, said that after the water is drained and debris is cleaned from Independence Day fireworks, the plan for the pool is straightforward: “Repair the vandalism that was done. Fill it back up again.” He was speaking with conservative podcaster Katie Miller.

[Read more…]

Count Binface debates at the Oxford Union

The Clacton by-election that will see Nigel Farage face off (bin off?) against Count Binface will take place on August 13th. It is not clear how many other independent candidates will enter the race but all the major parties are boycotting it.

I came across this clip of an Oxford Union debate from two years ago, before the last elections in the UK and US, where Binface was designated the final opposition speaker on the proposition ‘This House will fake it till you make it”. He made some cogent points about UK and US politics.

Meanwhile, Farage continues to be dogged by the £5 million pounds he received from a cryptocurency billionaire Christopher Harbone. He had said before declaring his candidacy that he would need about one million pounds per year to make up for lost earnings if he became an MP and so the timing is highly suspicious.

Nigel Farage told senior figures in Reform UK he would need “a million a year” to cover lost earnings if he stood for parliament in the 2024 general election, sources have told the Guardian, raising further questions about why he was given £5m by a crypto billionaire.

Sources say the discussion took place in March 2024 – shortly before the undeclared gift was made by Christopher Harborne on 5 April, according to the Thailand-based crypto billionaire’s lawyers.
…

These discussions about needing “a million a year” took place in March 2024, the Guardian has been told. Lawyers for Harborne have said the gift was made on 5 April 2024.

The Guardian has revealed that, according to financial industry sources, some of the £5m was not received until the end of May, just before Farage announced on 3 June that he would stand as an MP.

A true grifter, making money off public office, just like his hero Trump

{AD|

E. Jean Carroll finally gets some money from Trump

Trump was found guilty by a jury in 2023 of sexual abuse and defamation of E. Jean Carroll. But he used every legal option to try and delay or prevent the release of the money, filing appeal after appeal even up to the US Supreme Court. But they all failed and today, the judge released $5.6 million in funds that had been held in escrow.

The disbursement, made public in a 14 July entry on Carroll’s case docket, indicates that the funds were released by a court-held account on 9 July – one day after judge Lewis Kaplan ordered the release of this money.

Trump, who has been fighting against the release of this money since June after the supreme court on 29 June denied his request to hear his appeal, has denied wrongdoing.
[Read more…]

Jon Stewart on Lindsey Graham’s death

The late night talk shows I watch were no fans of Lindsey Graham and I was curious as to how they would treat the news of his death. They obviously would not want to make fun of it but at the same time would not want to pretend that he was an admirable person.

I though Jon Stewart managed to deal with it pretty well by turning it into a discussion of how geriatric the US Congress is.

It may be that Graham’s love of being on TV hastened his demise. When he complained on Saturday of not feeling well, people suggested that he go to the hospital but he said that he was due to be on Meet The Press on Sunday morning and did not want to miss that and would go after it. It is not clear if the tear in his aorta could have been detected and treated if he had gone to the hospital earlier.

Lindsey Graham will not be missed by me

There are many politicians who are awful because they espouse terrible policies. But there are others who are truly odious because they coat their evil actions with a veneer of smarmy smugness. I cannot bear to hear or see those people when they appear in the media which they often do because they love to be before the microphones and TV cameras and have a talent for harnessing attention. Their very appearance, voicing whatever view happens to serve their own interests of that moment, is enough for me to switch off.

Former Connecticut senator Joe Lieberman was one such person and I will never forgive Al Gore for picking him to be his running mate in the 2000 presidential election, so elevating his profile so that we could not avoid constantly seeing him uttering his unctuous moralizing.

South Carolina senator Lindsey Graham was another such person. He was a total warmonger and one of those Republicans who was a harsh critic of Trump when he first ran for the presidency but when Trump won and he saw the size of the Trump cult, he became one of his biggest ass-kissers, supporting Trump in everything, even when he reversed himself as he often did. Graham was also mean and would impugn the basest motives to his critics.

Today came news that Graham had died suddenly. We will now see the usual dreary ritual of other political leaders paying tributes to him as some kind of statesman because of the longevity of his career in the US senate and trying to find some nice things to say about one of the most unprincipled people in Congress.

I will not be one of them. When I heard this morning that he had died, my first feeling was one of relief that I would no longer have to read or hear or see him in the news as he promotes the latest views required by his sycophancy to Trump.

His passing, like that of Lieberman or Henry Kissinger, seems to suddenly make the air feel cleaner and fresher and the sun shine more brightly.

There are no good billionaires

I share with Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez the belief that there are no good billionaires.

“There’s a certain level of wealth and accumulation that is unearned,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., said during a May appearance on “It’s Open,” comedian Ilana Glazer’s podcast. “You just can’t earn that. You can get market power, you can break rules, you can abuse labor laws, you can pay people less than what they’re worth, but you can’t earn that.”

Her remarks caused an explosion of outrage from a lot of very rich people — and the media outlets they own — but many experts agree with her views.

“Billionaires just have too much and give back too little,” Brian Galle, a law professor at the University of California at Berkley, told me. In January, Galle published a book-length report titled “How to Tax the Ultrarich” for the Roosevelt Institute, and he has argued that a major problem with hyper-wealth is it creates unchecked power. “They control media, other key enterprises, and today the Cabinet.”

Billionaires have almost always obtained their money either by dishonorable means or by inheriting it from people who obtained it by dishonorable means and that any system that allows people to achieve this status is immoral. By dishonorable, I mean either illegally, or by using their connections to get an unfair advantage over others, or by taking advantage of all the loopholes available to exploit their employees or the resources of the Earth, or to drive out their competitors. It is the very rare person who had a good idea and then turned that into extreme wealth without using dubious methods. Hence billionaires should be considered to be people of poor character and one should never vote them into positions of any authority because they will use their power to further enrich themselves.
[Read more…]