Creationists are outliers in another way

Popehat is looking for someone to defend yet another science blogger from a lawsuit.

Pepijn van Erp blogs about science and pseudoscience from the Netherlands. He praises good science and skewers and critiques the bad. Wait a minute. Is that the Jaws theme playing? Yes. Yes it is — because blogging about junk science is a great way to get threatened or sued. In my experience, purveyors of “non-mainstream” science are unusually litigious and sensitive to criticism. You’ve seen it here at Popehat with “atavistic” cancer theorists and vaccine truthers and naturopaths and fans of questionable cancer remedies and AIDS deniers. I blame the crystals.

He’s being sued by Ruggero Santilli, a physics crank. However, I realized something as I was reading about it. I’ve become something of an unwilling expert in this area — I’ve been threatened with lawsuits so many times that I’ve completely lost count. I now regard cease-and-desist letters as ho-hum, and getting told I’m going to be sued for over 2 million dollars just triggers an eye-roll. But you know what’s weird?

I’ve never been threatened with a lawsuit by a creationist.

Notice that they aren’t present in Popehat’s list, either. The people who get most indignant about criticism seem to be people who are trying hardest to gain undeserved credibility from mainstream science, and that includes certain skeptics and atheists. Creationists love to steal scientific cred whenever they can, but it’s for the purpose of suckering Christians and Muslims, not for winning the respect of the scientific community.

I’ve also pissed off Catholics, but even they didn’t threaten to sue me. They threatened to kill me and my family and destroy my life, and repeatedly told me I was going to burn in hell, but not a whisper of dragging me into court over maltreatment of a cracker.

I’m going to have to file this datum away in my head as a reference to use in determining which are the “safe” targets of criticism. Religious nuts may talk a loud game about bashing your skull in, but they don’t hire lawyers to harass you.

Not “gill slits” again!

stage14_human_embryo

Troy Britain got blocked from the Institute for Creation Research facebook page because he criticized this comment:

Shouldn’t students be skeptical when they’re told that evolutionists can simply look at folds in embryos and see gill slits? The truth is that these are only folds of tissue in the pharynx region of vertebrates during the pharyngula stage of development. For mammals, birds, and reptiles, they never develop into a structure that is in any way like fish gills.

Britain has a good rebuttal in his article about “gill slits”, but I just have to point out something.

I’m an “evolutionist”. I don’t think any creationist would argue with that.

I teach students. Again, that’s indisputable — that’s my day job.

Furthermore, I teach relevant subjects: developmental biology and evolution.

But despite the fact that I ought to be example #1 for this terrible crime the creationist is condemning, I have never taught that all vertebrates have “gill slits”. I don’t know anyone who has. I took comparative anatomy and physiology in the 1970s, ages ago, and my instructors were all very explicit about the function, development, and evolution of pharyngeal structures. I would have been dinged badly if I’d made the mistake of suggesting that the pharynx was primitively a respiratory structure, rather than a feeding specialization.

It is quite correct that in most tetrapods, pharynx structures don’t form gills — gills are specialized derivatives of pharyngeal pouches, just as are hyoid arches and jaws. No one knowledgeable claims that humans develop fish-like gills. “Gill slits” is a colloquialism, not a technical term.

I am amused by the dismissal that they are “only folds of tissue”. Yeah, right. Your brain was only a fold of tissue in the pharyngula, too. Your major organs were mere diverticula. Your eyes were just outpocketings of the neural tube. Mere, just, only. Let’s all dismiss fundamental developmental structures as silly piles of cells, since, as we all know, mere cells do nothing, unless we’re trying to argue that they’re so darned complex that only a god could have created them.

We are so screwed

I think what’s emerging from the aftermath of last week’s election is that we underestimated the breadth of American racism, and that we failed to realize how damaging the aloofness of the Democratic party establishment was. We should have realized from the strength of the Sanders campaign that something was rotten up top. I hope that establishment listens to Bernie Sanders and his recipe for reform.

In the coming days, I will also provide a series of reforms to reinvigorate the Democratic Party. I believe strongly that the party must break loose from its corporate establishment ties and, once again, become a grass-roots party of working people, the elderly and the poor. We must open the doors of the party to welcome in the idealism and energy of young people and all Americans who are fighting for economic, social, racial and environmental justice. We must have the courage to take on the greed and power of Wall Street, the drug companies, the insurance companies and the fossil fuel industry.

I have this fear that the Democrats will bunker up, keep doing the same old thing, and continue to treat Republicans gently and with civility (or, more likely, servility) and slide further into irrelevance, while the Republicans are now digging in deeper into lunacy.

Of course, if the electorate was rejecting the corporatization of the Democrats to go for an outsider, boy did they get conned.

An organizational chart of Trump’s transition team shows it to be crawling with corporate lobbyists, representing such clients as Altria, Visa, Coca-Cola, General Electric, Verizon, HSBC, Pfizer, Dow Chemical, and Duke Energy. And K Street is positively salivating over all the new opportunities they’ll have to deliver goodies to their clients in the Trump era. Who could possibly have predicted such a thing?

The answer is, anyone who was paying attention. Look at the people Trump is considering for his Cabinet, and you won’t find any outside-the-box thinkers burning to work for the little guy. It’s a collection of Republican politicians and corporate plutocrats — not much different from who you’d find in any Republican administration.

It’s going to be worse than we ever imagined. Stop deluding yourself. Stop pretending that Trump can’t possibly be serious about the stupidities he has promised — he is packing his administration with the worst possible people, because he is compounding his own incompetence with the fact that he is a terrible judge of character who is surrounding himself with terrible people.

Like this.

gormlessgoons

That just says it all, doesn’t it?

Skepticon highlights

#inappropriatefistpose

#inappropriatefistpose

I’m back from Skepticon, and I’m feeling good. This is the most relaxing conference around for me — it’s a gathering of non-believers, but of non-abrasive, open-minded non-believers who also think there’s a heck of a lot more to being an atheist than expunging “god” from our coinage. It was all good, but here are my favorite events:

  • Margee Kerr talked about the physiology and psychology of fear. She’s been checking spooky places, like Eastern State Penitentiary, to try and figure out what it is about these supposedly “haunted” places that triggers fearful reactions in people. It turns out that the fear is real, but ghosts are not.

  • Jennifer Raff analyzed some outlandish claims about genetics: that Peruvians are descended from Nephilim and white Europeans, and genetic astrology. There were some particularly effective bits in their where she contrasted the lengths she goes to to extract and isolate DNA without contamination, with the rather sloppy stuff people like LA Marzulli do.

  • Alix Jules discussed the reality of racism. It’s not just loud people with southern accents, pickup trucks, and confederate flags: casual racism is everywhere, and it just won some big elections.

There was lots of other good stuff: Rebecca Watson made a triumphant return to the stage, there were lots of conversations about the state of secular activism, there was a taco truck parked outside, and of course lots of happy socializing. I also had to miss the entire last day — I had to fly back and get ready to teach this morning — so I didn’t get to see Jerry DeWitt or Debbie Goddard or the other people who finished up the conference with a bang.

Skepticon 10 will be held on 10-12 November 2017, so clear your calendars now.

Hey, gang, I’m in Springfield

I know I said this was going to be my “self-care” weekend, but I could not help myself, and last night while I was stuck in an airport I engaged with some liberals who were very irritated that I dared to point out that voting for Trump meant you were racist. Don’t you know that some of them voted for Obama in the last election, so they can’t be racist? (This is going to be the new “I have a black friend” theme). Don’t you know that if you call white people racists they’ll be alienated and won’t vote for Democrats anymore? (But somehow they care so little about race issues they’ll vote for an openly racist/sexist pig who is endorsed by the KKK and Stormfront). But my favorite response is this one:

Shut up, in the name of Free Speech!

I’ve also gotten a few responses, echoing the sentiments of Obama and Clinton, that we’ve got to give the guy a chance, and gosh, maybe he won’t be as bad as we think. I’ve decided that liberals have become masters of delusional thinking, because no, he’s going to be worse than we can imagine. He is appointing a climate change denialists to head up his transition team for the EPA, he’s going to have a known hate group leader to run his immigration transition team, and another anti-gay hate group leader to run domestic policy. He wants to put Sarah Palin in his cabinet, possibly as secretary of the interior. If you think the election was a shitshow, wait until you see how he governs.

So no apologies. If you voted for Trump, you belong in the basket of deplorables, and there’s no excuse you can offer to get you out. Whining that it hurts your feelings when we mention that the man you voted for is ready to wreck the environment, discriminate against everyone but white people, and turn the whole nation into Brownback’s Kansas is not only the worst excuse ever, but it’s pathetic as well.


By the way, Iris and Caine share similar feelings. You don’t get to claim you were a nice, conscientious, thoughtful person if you voted for Trump. You were just an asshole.

This is what I call self-care

I’m flying off this afternoon to lovely Springfield, Missouri for Skepticon. I’m taking a break from distressed students to go hang out with distressed atheists and humanists. It’ll be good for me.

I’ll be teaching a workshop on explaining evolution to people who don’t understand it at all tomorrow, which might be fun. I hope. I’ve got a little bit of an outline of major points I’ll be telling attendees, but mainly I’m going to provide some challenging questions and making the participants do all the work. Yeah, that’ll draw them in — come to my workshop, I’ll make you do everything!

I suspect that there might also be spontaneous outbursts of planning and activism, since it’s that kind of crowd.

I also have dinosaur stickers to give away. I might end up giving them all away on the first day, so hit me up early if you want something decorative for your badge.

What happened?

I’m sure I’m not alone in having spent my spare moments where this election went wrong.I have a few ideas, but first let me say where I don’t place the blame.

  • I don’t blame Hillary Clinton. She’s a competent, experienced, savvy politician, and in a normal election, she would have won. Notice that the winner was actually the opposite of all those things — we should not take from this experience the lesson that we should have nominated an idiot psychopath.

    She was not a perfect candidate, but they don’t exist. In particular, I had legitimate concerns about her militarism (being chummy with Kissinger was disturbing), but the ideas that bothered me would not have disturbed the people who elected Trump. They’re all for bombing foreigners.

  • I don’t blame Bernie Sanders. I am not convinced he would have been a more successful candidate — a better candidate, I think, but again, what appealed to me wouldn’t have appealed to the Trumpkins. He did try to shake the Democrats out of their complacency, but they eventually settled on a “safe” candidate, who legitimately won by playing the existing Democratic machine better.

  • I don’t blame Stein or Johnson. They were terrible, awful candidates, but the kind of people who would vote for those bozos would have voted badly anyway. There is always noise, and that’s what they were — inevitable statistical fluctuations.

So whose fault was it?

  • The out-of-touch Democratic Party. We lost because the white middle class doesn’t see the Democrats as siding with them. Robert Reich has a good summary: it’s the unions.

    Democrats also abandoned the white working class.

    Democrats have occupied the White House for sixteen of the last twenty-four years, and in that time scored some important victories for working families – the Affordable Care Act, an expanded Earned Income Tax Credit, and the Family and Medical Leave Act, for example.

    But they’ve done nothing to change the vicious cycle of wealth and power that has rigged the economy for the benefit of those at the top, and undermined the working class. In some respects, Democrats have been complicit in it.

    Both Bill Clinton and Barack Obama ardently pushed for free trade agreements, for example, without providing the millions of blue-collar workers who thereby lost their jobs any means of getting new ones that paid at least as well.

    They also stood by as corporations hammered trade unions, the backbone of the white working class. Clinton and Obama failed to reform labor laws to impose meaningful penalties on companies that violated them, or enable workers to form unions with a simple up-or-down votes.

    I remember when the Democrats were the labor party. That hasn’t been the case for a long, long time. If you’re in the rust belt or the farm belt, Democrats have been doing a crappy job of supporting your interests.

    Glenn Greenwald says the same thing.

    The indisputable fact is that prevailing institutions of authority in the West, for decades, have relentlessly and with complete indifference stomped on the economic welfare and social security of hundreds of millions of people. While elite circles gorged themselves on globalism, free trade, Wall Street casino-gambling, and endless wars (wars that enriched the perpetrators and sent the poorest and most marginalized to bear all their burdens), they completely ignored the victims of their gluttony, except when those victims piped up a bit too much — when they caused a ruckus — and were then scornfully condemned as troglodytes who were the deserved losers in the glorious, global game of meritocracy.

    That message was heard loud and clear. The institutions and elite factions that have spent years mocking, maligning, and pillaging large portions of the population — all while compiling their own long record of failure and corruption and destruction — are now shocked that their dictates and decrees go unheeded. But human beings are not going to follow and obey the exact people they most blame for their suffering. They’re going to do exactly the opposite: purposely defy them and try to impose punishment in retaliation. Their instruments for retaliation are Brexit and Trump. Those are their agents, dispatched on a mission of destruction: aimed at a system and culture that they regard, not without reason, as rife with corruption and, above all else, contempt for them and their welfare.

    Democratic leaders have been feeding at the same trough as the Republicans. No wonder they aren’t trusted. They’re so mistrusted that the white middle class effectively voted against their own interests to oppose them. Does anyone believe Trump will do anything to help the schmoes who actually work for a living? Nope, but he did a great job playing on their resentments.

  • Another factor must not be forgotten: good old American racism and sexism. There’s more to it than lack of support for the middle class — after all, it was only the white middle class that succumbed to Trump’s lies. Unfortunately, it was the non-white middle class that was victimized by Republican voter suppression.

  • The machinery to make Donald Trump president of the United States had been idling for two decades waiting for Trump or someone very much like him to come along, set off the afterburners, and zoom off with the entire party. Just to use our previous example, while nobody on your television Tuesday night saw fit to make much of it, the Republican triumphs in several states were helped immeasurably by the mechanism of voter suppression that had been painstakingly built by state legislatures and painstakingly reinforced by the larval Rehnquists who’d been salted throughout the federal judiciary. It was just sitting there, the entire mechanism, waiting, its full power as yet untested because no conventional politician wanted to push the mechanism to full limits, because very few conventional politicians wanted to risk the damage to the institutions of democracy that might occur if that machine revved up to full throttle.

    I blame the Republican party, too. They’ve been feeding this beast for decades. Trump was not an anomaly, but a logical conclusion.

    It has been said that Trump hijacked the Republican Party. This is said by Republicans who still wish in their timid dreams that Ted Cruz or Marco Rubio had been strapped into the machine for another safe run on the same old track. That is not entirely true. He didn’t hijack the machine. He just turned it into a high-performance vehicle. Trump’s visceral appeal—the sexism, the racism, the xenophobia, the crude stupidity and know-nothingism, the appeals to a lost America, to people who most deeply felt its loss, none of whom was him—was merely fuel of higher octane than anyone had dared put into the machine before. He poured it in by the gallon, disengaged the emergency brake, mashed the accelerator to the floorboard and was off.

    The white middle class has been soaking in Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck and Michael Savage and Alex Jones and Fox News. The Republicans embraced it. The Democrats provided nothing to counter it.

  • The media. The awful, no good media. We have 24 hour news channels that aren’t interested in information or news, but need noise to fill up the time. So they provide cheap babble and superficial propaganda nonstop — and they’re suckers for the kind of sensationalist tripe people like Trump at providing. And what have they spent the past few months focused on?

  • Fucking polls. It’s all we hear about, that and scandals. Policy and plans are all ignored. Nate Silver is treated as a hero.

    Remember the election where Romney and the Republicans were living in a rainbow world where their crappy polls were predicting victory? We’re in the same boat now: our polls all predicted triumph, and oh, what a surprise. When will we learn? Screw all the pollsters. Ignore them. Not that the news will.

    It also leads to good-enoughism. Hey, the polls tell us we’ve got 52% of the vote! For some reason, that’s not read as hey, 48% of the population dislikes us. All you have to do is edge out the competition, and you win all the marbles. No need for deep structural change in our policies, always pick the safe candidate who will maintain the status quo with as little upheaval as possible, even when upheaval is exactly what the electorate is asking for.

So what do we do now? In the short term, we fight. We oppose everything Trump stands for every step of the way. We learn from the Republicans: intransigence and obstructionism doesn’t hurt your party when the public despises the government as it stands. No more making nice, no more of this “reaching across the aisle” bullshit. Kill Republican policies dead whereever you can, and for once, the Democrats have to be vocal about their opposition.

In the long term, the Democrats have to wake up and realize that a comfortable slight edge isn’t enough, especially when Republicans cheat like hell with gerrymandering and voter suppression. That means they have to take a deep look at what they’re doing — they might have to give up those nice benefits from monied interests to actually appeal to workers, the poor, and the voters who don’t pour money into the trough. Clinton spent twice as much as Trump on the campaign — maybe we should realize that feeding the advertising machine isn’t as valuable as feeding the needs of the electorate.

civil

What I’m afraid will happen, though, is that the Democrats will turtle up and play even more cautiously. They’ll look at the fact that they won the popular vote by a slim margin and think that all they have to do is change nothing and wait for the rising tide of minorities to eventually lift them into power. They must not do that. We will be surprised again. This is not a horserace. We are not gambling. We are not playing the odds and hedging our bets.

I’ve lived through three crushing political disappointments now: the elections of Reagan, Bush II, and now, Trump. It’s tempting to say we’ll get through this and have a better day in 2020. The lesson I’ve learned is that we won’t: that I lived through them doesn’t mean that others didn’t suffer and die. Reagan presided over the deaths by negligence of so many gay people; he laid a foundation of racism and contempt for government that we still have to deal with. Bush wrecked our foreign policy and killed thousands of our own and hundreds of thousands of others — don’t dismiss that by announcing that you survived his reign. Who knows what chaos Trump will sow, but people will be hurt. They will be hurt right now. Black people are being murdered by the police, immigrants are being oppressed right now, and we do not have the luxury of waiting the new regime out. It is not consolation to say that the pain will be selective and that the survivors will survive.

That’s exactly what has led to this situation. We need to stop engaging in this fine-grained balancing act where we try to ‘triangulate’ and build coalitions of the barely tenable, because it leads to fragile support that can be disrupted by one loud-mouthed boor who promises to break everything.