It’s so much better to spend other peoples’ money!


Washington Post POLITICS ALERT email, July 29, 11:31 AM EDT | Headline:  "Trump asks Supreme Court to overturn $83 million verdict in E. Jean Carroll case" Separately, the Justice Department petitioned the high court Tuesday to allow the federal government to replace Trump as the defendant in the case.

Trump exhausted all his appeals in the E. Jean Carroll defamation suit, when the “Supreme” Court shockingly upheld lower court verdicts that ordered him to pay Ms. Carroll $5 million. Of course he’s appealing the second verdict – you know, the one where after losing $5 million the first time around, he went on to defame Ms. Carroll YET AGAIN, and the judge ordered him to pay her $83 million this time?

Nothing is newsworthy about the second appeal. What is newsworthy is the separate motion filed by the government, petitioning the court to allow said government to replace Donald Trump as the defendant.

So, if it turns out he does have to pay the $83 million, wouldn’t it be so much better if U.S. taxpayers paid his bill?

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER.

Comments

  1. Pierce R. Butler says

    Clearly, due to all the terrible things the US taxpayers said about Trump’s good friend E. Jean Carroll, we must owe him a few billion as well!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *