The argument was lengthy;
It was fervid; it was strong;
Both participants were certain
That the other one was wrong:
Was the object of contention
A potential, or a child?
Just a maybe, or a baby
With a list of rights compiled?
Is it murder of an innocent
When choosing to abort?
The argument was wholly framed
In questions of this sort
For years, it seems, they stood their ground
And argued with each other…
And not a thought was wasted
On the wishes of the mother.
So, yeah, I saw an article in the National Catholic Register: The War On Religion Is Real And We Are Losing.
These days, we hear so much about “the war on …” this or that, we have learned to drown it out as hyperbolic nonsense promoted by those with an agenda. The war on women is a perfect example.
But I am here to tell you that the war on religion is real and religion is losing–big time.
Being religious is about putting what you believe into every day practice. That is they call it practicing your religion.
But increasingly, the State is imposing barriers to practice of your religion anywhere but in your head or heart. Out here in the real world, religion has no place.
Yes… the fact that the Church is not allowed to impose its desires on the rest of society, through Catholic-approved hospital procedures, through dictating what employees can and cannot have in their earned benefits packages, through (yes, even this!) the requirement that public businesses not be allowed to discriminate! What the rest of us recognize as the reeling in of privilege, this article saw as an attack on the God-given rights of the church. It’s a real war… unlike that silly “war” on women. There is no war on women. “War”, after all, implies that both sides are armed.
But today’s verse is not really about the article. It’s about the comments. I know, I know, never read the comments! But I really did find it astonishing, just how much concern there was for the only person involved–the preborn child. The discussion of the fetus, like the pictures on the protester’s placards, is remarkably devoid of any sight of the woman whose body quite literally surrounds the issue.
We are told that “science tells us” that the baby is its own unique person, with rights. Oddly enough, I think science might also tell us that the woman is a person as well, but this is not mentioned. We are told that “proper medical care” of the mother is only proper when the baby’s welfare is given equal weight (in practice, this can mean that if one dies, both must), because both are equally complete human beings. Good thing the church cares so much it is willing to do the deciding for everybody–everybody gets the same freedom when everybody is the Church’s puppet.
I would love, some time, for the debate to be framed around the woman. She is nothing less than invisible. There is a reason for that; there is no defense once the woman is acknowledged. The church has no right to make her decisions.
Related:
Jennifer, Jennifer
Fetal Testimony
God Is Pro-Choice (Just Anti-Woman)
Al Dente says
A group of geriatric, celebate bachelors is trying to impose their views on everyone else and whole bunches of everyone else isn’t buying. Too bad, so sad.
Mary L says
A “unique person with rights” doesn’t live in a uterus.
Randomfactor says
At what point in the pregnancy do the woman’s rights go to zero on the graph? Anti-abortion types would say “at conception.” (If not before.)
The correct answer is “never.”
Pliny the in Between says
I did a panel on this tendency to forget about the women in this equation a while back. Sadly, I do believe a fair number of people see things in that light. Certainly the RCC seems to.
http://pictoraltheology.blogspot.com/2013/11/post-roe-v-wade.html