“There’s not a hint there that anyone used any racial epithet”


America’s favorite Irish-terrorism-supporter-elected-to-Congress took to Twitter on Wednesday afternoon to thank the Staten Island grand jury for its decision not to indict NYPD Officer Daniel Pantaleo for the July death of Eric Garner after being placed in a chokehold while under arrest.

“Thanks to SI grand jury for doing justice & not yielding to outside pressure,” King (or a social media intern) pecked out Wednesday afternoon. “Decision must be respected.”

The congressman — who once reaffirmed his support for Irish terrorists after their attack on Royal forces in Ireland, and who thinks journalists should be arrested for practicing free speech — added: “Compassion for the Garner family.”

Ah yes “outside pressure” – otherwise known as citizens objecting to a death in police custody.

Apparently CNN was sufficiently charmed or appalled by King’s tweet to invite him to chat yesterday evening.

Despite the video evidence of Garner repeatedly saying “I can’t breathe” as officers tackled him the ground and choked him until he ultimately died, King would not allow that excessive force had been used.

“First of all, the death was tragic, and our hearts have to go out to the Garner family,” King began. Getting that obligatory statement out of the way, the congressman reiterated that he does not believe the officer should have been indicted and proceeded to defend the police actions.

“If he had not had asthma and a heart condition and was so obese, almost definitely he would not have died for this,” King said of Garner. “The police had no reason to know he was in serious condition.” On Garner repeating “I can’t breathe,” King said, “the fact of the matter is, if you can’t breathe, you can’t talk.” He even suggested that Garner may have been faking those symptoms so the police would go easier on him.

If you can’t breathe, you can for a short interval gasp out a few words.

Then you die.

“People are saying very casually that this was done out of racial motives or violation of civil rights,” he continued. “There’s not a hint there that anyone used any racial epithet.”

You have got to be kidding.

What next? They talk to Daniel Pantaleo and he tells them, “I don’t see color”?




  1. Blanche Quizno says

    It’s nice to know that police can murder whoever they like so long as they speak politely while they’re doing it. And it’s always the victim’s fault. He was *obese*! Surely THAT’s a crime, or at least threatening enough to everyone in the vicinity that he should be choked to death! Good thing he wasn’t riding one of those little scooters or he would no doubt have needed to be tazed multiple times and then shot a couple dozen times.

  2. freemage says

    Someone utters the words, “I can’t breathe” and then dies while in a chokehold, and this twit thinks that’s evidence that he was LYING? Fuck this fucking fucker with all the fucking fucks.

  3. busterggi says

    “If he had not had asthma and a heart condition and was so obese, almost definitely he would not have died for this,”

    Oh no, the poor cop would have had to hold him for at least another 30 seconds if he were in better shape – I’ll bet he would have too.

  4. johnthedrunkard says

    We are so sick culturally that a policeman can kill someone ON TAPE and have fewer repercussions than if he had been caught saying ‘nigger.’ David Duke can pass for a ‘real’ political candidate merely by adjusting his public vocabulary.

    Six officers are present at Garner’s death. Aren’t these guys supposed to have training in emergency medical procedures? Isn’t it these guys’ JOB to get difficult people into custody without killing them, or bystanders?

  5. Morgan says

    Seconding freemage: what’s King claiming caused Garner’s death? Is the argument that Garner lied that he couldn’t breathe to get the cops to go easy on him, the cops sagely ignored this lie, and then choked him to death anyway?

    If you can’t indicate to a cop choking you that you can’t breathe by saying so – if actually being in danger means you can’t speak – then don’t the cops have a higher responsibility to monitor your well-being? Doesn’t that mean that using such a tactic should be forbidden outright?

    Wasn’t it?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *