Sowing strife

Saudi Arabia’s Grand Mufti doesn’t like Islamic State and al Qaeda. He thinks they’re just big ol’ heretic factional cultist splitter types.

But Saudi Arabia isn’t exactly a paradise of liberal tolerance itself, as you may have noticed.

The arch conservatives Abdulrahman al-Barrak and Nasser al-Omar, who has more than a million followers on Twitter, have accused Shi’ites of sowing “strife, corruption and destruction among Muslims”.

Sheikh Saleh al-Luhaidan was sacked as judiciary head in 2008 for saying owners of media that broadcast depravity have forsaken their faith, a crime punishable in Sharia law by death, but he remains a member of the kingdom’s top Muslim council.

Abdulaziz al-Fawzan, a professor of Islamic law and frequent guest on the popular al-Majd religious television channel, has accused the West of being behind the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks on the United States, saying “these criminals want to take control over the world”.

Such opinions, which echo the views of militants in Iraq, are not unusual in Saudi Arabia, which applies Sharia Muslim law, has beheaded 20 people in the past month, and where clerics oversee a lavish state-funded religious infrastructure.

The problem with IS isn’t so much all the killing and enslaving; it’s the attempting to move in on the territory.

Saudi authorities point to the influence of the radical wing of the Muslim Brotherhood in developing modern jihadi thinking, but play down Riyadh’s decades of support for Islamists around the world as a counterweight to anti-royal leftist ideology.

The government’s inability or reluctance to crack down on expressions of intolerance towards non-Sunnis has led some Saudi liberals and foreign analysts to ask if the kingdom is committed to tackling radicalism’s roots, or only its symptoms.

“It’s their definition of extremism we may not agree with. It is still very mainstream to call Shi’ites infidels. That’s not seen as extremist,” said Stephane Lacroix, author of Awakening Islam, a book about Islamism in Saudi Arabia.

Whereas in secular democracies, “infidel” isn’t even a category.

I like our way better.


  1. says

    The state religion of Saudi Arabia is Wahhabism, a puritanical, ultra-conservative school of Sunni Islam comparable to the Hassidic movement in Judaism or Dominion Theology in Christianity. The claim that they, and they alone, hold to pure Islam is being directly challenged by IS, which has declared that its leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, is the Caliph, the inheritor of the Prophet’s authority and spiritual ruler of all Muslims everywhere. So, like any proper religious fanatic, the Saudi religious authority must do everything possible to utterly destroy the perceived threat to its own claims.

  2. Trebuchet says

    ISIS/ISIL will never be happy until the entire world is under Wahabi Sunni Muslim control.
    Saudi Arabia will never be happy until the entire world is under Wahabi Sunni Muslim control.
    It’s completely different, don’t you see?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *