Trump comes to Starmer’s rescue

The Labour Party came into power in the UK in July 2024 in a landslide win that saw them win 411 seats out of 650, propelled by a public that was fed up with 14 years of Conservative rule. The problem was that Keir Starmer, now the prime minister of the UK, campaigned on bland statements instead of specifics and once in power, abandoned many of the issues that were sought by the party base, hewing to a more rightward direction instead. That, coupled with incompetence and poor choice of people appointed to key positions, resulted in his popularity quickly dissipating.

Just recently, he was in deeper trouble. The fiasco over his appointment of Jeffrey Epstein’s close buddy Peter Mandelson as ambassador to the US and the forced resignation of his chief of staff had raised serious questions about his judgment. Then in late February, the party suffered a disastrous defeat at a by-election where the Green Party won a seat that had been comfortably Labour.

Hannah Spencer, a local plumber and Green party councillor, was elected as the party’s first MP in northern England after overturning Labour’s 13,000-vote majority.

Labour came third in the tightly contested race, 5,616 votes behind the Greens on 14,980 votes, while Reform UK finished second with 10,578 votes. The result represents a 25.4 percentage point drop in Labour’s share of the vote compared with 2024.

The Conservatives and Liberal Democrats lost their deposits as they won fewer than 5% of the votes, with both under 2%. The Greens’ victory in a Labour stronghold, its first ever in a Westminster byelection, establishes the party as a serious political force and a credible anti-Reform alternative.

It will deepen concerns among Labour MPs that Starmer’s party is haemorrhaging voters on the left in an effort to thwart the rise of Nigel Farage’s Reform.

[Read more…]

Why Bondi was fired

Given her almost cartoonish expressions of support for Trump, why was Pam Bondi fired as attorney general? She had been aware that there were people who had Trump’s ear who had been pushing for her ouster but she thought that she could weather the storm or that at least he would give her a graceful way to exist, say over the next few months. But as is the case with Trump, loyalty for him is a one-way street, and he summarily fired her yesterday.

The New York Times reports that her main problem was that she had failed to secure convictions against people that Trump had wanted prosecuted, even though the cases against them were weak, so that even grand juries, usually so accommodating of prosector’s request to return indictments, refused to go along. But Trump doesn’t care if the people he appoints are given impossible tasks. For him, a failure is a failure, and even a sign of disloyalty to him.
[Read more…]

Bye, bye, Bondi

Even being an ultra-loyalist brown-noser wasn’t enough for attorney general Pam Bondi to keep her job as attorney general because Trump just fired her. She continued her sycophancy even after her ignominious ouster, saying that she will continue fighting for Trump in the private sector. This is understandable since she will be seeking a pardon for any and all transgressions committed by her.

So what caused her demise? After all, she threw a major tantrum at congressional hearings, insulted members of the oversight panel, rescinded prosecution of Trump allies, purged career attorneys who were deemed to be insufficiently cult-like, went after his foes, and praised Trump to the skies at every opportunity. All this would seem to be the kinds of things that would endear her to her narcissistic boss. Some of her appointees as US attorneys were thrown out by judges as being unqualified or not properly appointed but that kind of incompetence seems normal for this chaotic administration. Here is a timeline of her greatest hits during her time in office.
[Read more…]

Blog comments policy

I usually post my blog comments policy at the beginning of the month for the benefit of new readers. Rather than posting the whole thing again, here is a link to the last time I posted it.

I enjoy reading the comments and it has become more pleasurable now. One of the things that used to annoy me were those commenters who seemed to feel the need to show themselves to be clever at the expense of others, usually by making needlessly sarcastic and denigrating comments.

It is also the case that long time commenters get the know each other and sometimes they will use that knowledge to snipe at another commenter based on their history, just to score a debating point even though it had nothing to do with the current post. It is somewhat like people in long-term relationships who know each other well and will dredge up past statements to try and ‘win’ an argument.

Thankfully, that is not happening anymore.

Trying to explain stock market gyrations

I recently posted about my puzzlement as to why the stock market indices gyrate wildly based on Trump’s utterances when we all know that he both lies and changes tack on what seems like whims. Several commenters had valuable insights and now this article from yesterday tries to explain what is going on.

Markets are rallying on a familiar bet: That President Donald Trump will, once again, back down. (It’s not called TACO Tuesday for nothing.)

The Dow, S&P 500 and the Nasdaq just had their best day since May 2025, roaring higher Tuesday in large part because of a report (and semi-confirmation) that the White House is considering an end to America’s involvement in the Iran war without reopening the Strait of Hormuz. CNN later confirmed Trump and his administration increasingly believe that they can’t promise to reopen the strait as a prerequisite to declaring an end to hostilities with Iran.
[Read more…]

How the manosphere influencers distort gender power relationships

I have been thinking more about the documentary Inside the Manosphere that I reviewed recently and it struck me how the so-called influencers of the movement that were featured in the film have taken a kernel of truth and distorted it in order to give the young men who they have lured into their sphere a false idea of how power is wielded in society. It shows how successful a sleight-of-hand argument can be when wielded skillfully against their targets, in this case young, poor men who are frustrated at their lack of success in life, be it in the area of money or with women.

The influencers first assert that it is ‘the system’ that is keeping young men down and preventing them from becoming successful. There is a kernel of truth in that (that most conspiratorial theories must have in order to gain acceptance) but the influencers then divert attention away from the capitalist system that is exploiting most people and say that a shadowy cabal is doing it. Who exactly makes up this shadowy cabal is left largely unspecified but Jews are frequently mentioned.
[Read more…]

Mark Twain’s War Prayer should be read by everyone

At a Christian worship service last week, defense secretary Pete Hegseth gave the following prayer.

“Let every round find its mark against the enemies of righteousness and our great nation. Give them wisdom in every decision, endurance for the trial ahead, unbreakable unity, and overwhelming violence of action against those who deserve no mercy.”

Pope Leo XV issued what seemed like an apparent rebuke.

During a Palm Sunday mass in St Peter’s Square, the pope said the conflict between Iran, Israel and the US was “atrocious” and that Jesus could not be used to justify war.

“This is our God: Jesus, king of peace, who rejects war, whom no one can use to justify war,” he told tens of thousands of worshippers. “He does not listen to the prayers of those who wage war, but rejects them.”

Quoting a Bible passage, Leo added: “‘Even though you make many prayers, I will not listen: your hands are full of blood.’”

[Read more…]

The barbarians attacking the rich cultural heritage of Iran

It is easy to focus on the day-to-day events in the US-Israeli attack on Iran, we should not forget that what is being attacked is much more than material things.

In an essay titled A Bitter Education in the New York Review of Books, the Indian writer Pankaj Mishra writes about the strong legacy of Persian culture that was cherished in India by intellectuals like Jawaharlal Nehru, Mahatma Gandhi, and Rabindranath Tagore, and that is now being squandered by the current Hindu nationalist prime minister Narendra Modi and the westernized classes of Iran and India as they genuflect to the western capitalist ethos.

Jawaharlal Nehru wrote in The Discovery of India that “among the many people and races who have come in contact with Indians and influenced India’s life and culture, the oldest and most persistent have been the Iranians.” It is the kind of historical fact readily verified by ordinary experience. My grandfather was more fluent in Persian than in any other language; I grew up using Persian words in everyday conversations, eating food that originated in Persia, and listening to music whose most widespread and enduring forms—qawwali and the ghazal—were refined by a medieval poet in Persian.

For nearly a millennium, Persian was the lingua franca of Asia: the language widely used by political and intellectual mandarins and necessary, too, for travelers such as Marco Polo and Ibn Battuta, who both deployed the language in China. Indeed, if Persian nationalism has maintained a profound sense of historical continuity transcending many different political regimes, it is because of its roots in the achievements of an expansive and long-lasting Persian civilization, or ecumene. Translated into many vernacular languages, the poetry and philosophy of Firdausi, Attar, Rumi, Hafez, Sa‘di, Nizami, Ibn Sina, and Nizam al-Mulk assumed a canonical authority across Asia. Rulers everywhere, whether Muslim, Hindu, or Buddhist, adopted Persian ideologies of statecraft that, as Richard Eaton writes in India in the Persianate Age: 1000–1765 (2019), privileged “the notion of justice and connecting economy, morality and politics.”
[Read more…]

How Epstein got rich

Even someone as deeply cynical as I am about the lack of morality of Trump and his willingness to do anything to further his personal interests find myself gagging that the suggestion that he would start a major war with Iran just to get the embarrassing Epstein story off the news focus. But there is no doubt that the result of the war has largely been that the demands for the full release of the files has been shunted to the back burner. So here is my measly attempt o bring it back to the front.

One of the big puzzles in the Epstein story has been how this one-time math and physics teacher at a private school without a college degree started the process by which he managed to acquire all the wealth that enabled him to live a luxurious predatory lifestyle that involved raping young women, while cavorting with a host of well-knowing people in the world of business, science, and the arts. I was not aware that back on December 16, 2025, the New York Times published a long story that traced his origins from the beginning and filled in many of the missing details. I will provide just the basic summary.

In his first two decades of business, we found that Epstein was less a financial genius than a prodigious manipulator and liar. Abundant conspiracy theories hold that Epstein worked for spy services or ran a lucrative blackmail operation, but we found a more prosaic explanation for how he built a fortune. A relentless scammer, he abused expense accounts, engineered inside deals and demonstrated a remarkable knack for separating seemingly sophisticated investors and businessmen from their money. He started small, testing his tactics and seeing what he could get away with. His early successes laid the foundation for more ambitious ploys down the road. Again and again, he proved willing to operate on the edge of criminality and burn bridges in his pursuit of wealth and power.

Rung by rung, Epstein climbed a social and financial ladder, often using young women as a potent form of currency. His girlfriends, lovers and even exes helped elevate his status inside a bank, got him hired to track down missing assets and gained him entree to prestigious organizations. And deliberately or not, some of them enabled him as he constructed a sex-trafficking operation that would later ensnare hundreds of teenage girls and young women.

[Read more…]

The options with the war

As the US-Israeli war with Iran and Lebanon drags on, trying to figure out how it will end becomes harder. Trying to predict where wars will head is bad enough at the best of times, given their chaotic nature, but doing so with reckless leaders like Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu, who seem to be willing to do anything for their own short-term benefit, can be seen as an exercise in futility.

On the surface, it would appear that since Iran is in a much weaker position militarily, it will be forced at some point to sue for peace under unfavorable conditions. At least that is what Trump’s rhetoric seems to indicate that he believes. He keeps saying that the US has already won or that the Iranians want to make a deal. But Iran has steadfastly refuted that latter claim. This may be because for the Iranian regime, this is an existential threat and hence they have no interest in agreeing to anything that does not keep them in power. So for them, dragging this thing out indefinitely, and inflicting any damage they can on the global economy by (say) attacking the oil infrastructure and closing the Strait of Hormuz is an acceptable price to pay and they will hold out until Trump offers them something that they can accept.
[Read more…]