Given how much I loathe the subject and am annoyed by the fans, you may wonder why I hang around in spaces that are bullish on LLMs. Nowadays, the primary reason is for feedback; people who agree with you aren’t likely to search for weak spots in your arguments, whereas those who disagree will be eager to do so. It really helps sharpen them up… if you get that feedback, of course. More often than not I find my arguments around LLMs are ignored. That’s perfectly fine! No-one is obligated to provide feedback, let alone for free, and it can be a waste of time to push back on a very weak argument with obvious flaws.
But sometimes an argument lands in a weird middle ground. You can tell someone wants to push back, badly, but they can’t find a point to push on. This could be evidence they’re not up to the task, but it could also be a sign that you’ve stumbled on a solid argument. I had another one of those recently, this time centred around “intelligence.”
Typing this up is also an excuse to correct the previous time I ventured into this topic, which now seems a bit problematic. Plus, I got something wrong in the original argument as well.
