Let’s dig out another article from my drafts bin, something I don’t think I was ever going to finish. This draft was titled “Data Science as function fitting”. It begins:
In the buzzword-ridden age of AI hype, perhaps there’s value in having more unmagical ways of talking about data science. My most unmagical description, is that data science is basically function fitting. It’s like what Excel does when you ask Excel to draw a trendline through a set of data points.
So that’s the thesis statement. But is it a thesis worth arguing? It feels kind of “hot take” quality to me. When you have a large enough audience, you start to be aware that at least a few readers are experts, and will call you out on your bullshit. And so immediately after stating the thesis, I felt it was necessary to add a ton of qualifying statements. You know, like I didn’t really mean it.