Here’s a “doctor” who should be struck off.
“I’m not going to sacrifice the well-being of my child. My child is pure,” Dr. Jack Wolfson said in the interview. “It’s not my responsibility to be protecting their child.”
Wolfson was responding to a public appeal for all parents to vaccinate their children from Arizona pediatrician Dr. Tim Sacks…
That’s the one we read about yesterday.
Wolfson dismissed his fellow doctor’s appeal to anti-vaxxers.
“As far as I’m concerned, it’s very likely that her leukemia is from vaccinations in the first place,” Wolfson said.
The CNN interviewer asked Wolfson repeatedly if he could live with himself if his unvaccinated child got other children, like Sacks’ daughter, fatally sick.
“I could live with myself easily. It’s an unfortunate thing that people die, but people die. And I’m not going to put my child at risk to save another child,” he said.
That’s a disgusting human being right there.
Rob says
It’s his ‘opinion’ that a vaccination gave his daughter leukaemia. Great scientific method from a doctor that. I’d strike him off just for that lack of critical thought alone, quite apart from the fact he’s a steaming pile of shit.
zubanel says
It demonstrates not only how isolated specialists are in their own fields but also how partitioned off the minds of the he otherwise most intelligent people can be, holding rancidly dangerous ideas as true along side maliciously well mapped ideas that make them capable of terrific healing acts. Nurturing on the one hand and deadly on the other. It’s easy to see how scientifically focussed individuals can be soaked in religion. The trick is not using thew whole human being as the standard for response. If they’re right in one area, great, if they’re wrong in another, call them on it or shun them.
thephilosophicalprimate says
His complete medical incompetence concerns me more than his repellent morals. I wouldn’t trust this “cardiologist” to prescribe aspirin. This isn’t a matter of being hyper-specialized: If you aren’t able to grasp basic principles of how evidence-based medicine works, you ought not to be trusted or permitted to practice medicine at all, in any specialty. On the basis of his misuse of the word “pure” alone, I’d be willing to wager that he regularly gives outrageously bad pseudoscientific medical advice to his patients.
sc_cf67521d06de66549b93107fecc68ecb says
Dr. Wolfson’s Care Philosophy
I use nutrition and supplements to prevent and treat disease. Reducing pharmaceuticals is a passion.
http://www.healthgrades.com/physician/dr-jack-wolfson-2b6fm#tab=background-check
Pierce R. Butler says
Carson/Wolfson 2016!
Unless Joe the Plumber™ is available, of course…
NateHevens. He who hates straight, white, cis-gendered, able-bodied men (not really) says
Fuck him. That’s all I have to say.
Fuck him.
Oh… and he needs to lose his license.
left0ver1under says
Why hasn’t the AMA already revoked Wolfson’s license?
They won’t because they’re probably more interested in protecting doctors than the public. They view it as a fraternity, an accurate word to describe it for a multiple of reasons.
Anne Fenwick says
Shocking that if he has any child patients they would be among those most at risk
sambarge says
Is Liberty University giving our medical degrees now? I know that half the doctors in the world were in the bottom half of their class but, Jesus Christ on a Cracker, how stupid do you have to be to believe that “purity” (whatever the fuck that is) is something that a child can possess and that lack of it leads to disease?
Thank goodness this idiot spoke out. His patients can leave his practice in droves now. I wouldn’t bring my child to a doctor who cared so little if she lived or died.
Trebuchet says
I agree with the “disgusting” part.
We need a term for crank doctors like “Nobel Disease” for scientists and “The Salem Hypothesis” for engineers. Ben Carson and Mehmet Oz come immediately to mind. Both skilled surgeons and utter crackpots.
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Salem_Hypothesis
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Nobel_disease
Jenora Feuer says
From some of the discussion over at Respectful Insolence, Wolfson wasn’t that blatantly bad until he got married.
To a fairly heavily woo-ish chiropractor.
I like the fact that the CNN interviewer asked multiple times… that’s an amazing bit of ‘I’m all right, Jack!’ on display from Wolfson right there.
PatrickG says
From sc_etc’s link @ #4:
Apparently, his patients agree with the sentiments here:
Level of trust in provider’s decisions: 1.5/5 Below national average.
80 responses
How well provider explains medical condition(s) : 2.0/5 Below national average
79 responses
moarscienceplz says
Why would a person with this attitude bother going to medical school? Did he do it in anticipation of spending half the week on the golf course and raking in hundreds of thousands of dollars? If I were a patient of his, I’d start looking for a cardiologist that actually cares about keeping me alive and healthy.
johnthedrunkard says
Married to a chiro?
I see that others are doing some background.
What sort of education does this twit claim?
Is there a religious aspect? (VERY common with chiropractors)
Libertarian? (ditto)
stewart says
https://www.facebook.com/144310995587370/photos/a.271728576178944.71555.144310995587370/933067740045021/?l=f7c16b7441