A right-wing radio host gives us a look at his inner world.
Fringe right-wing radio host Pete Santilli made disturbing comments about Hillary Clinton last week, calling for sexual violence against the former secretary of state because of her alleged involvement in a bizarre conspiracy theory.
“Miss Hillary Clinton needs to be convicted, she needs to be tried, convicted and shot in the vagina,” he said. “I wanna pull the trigger. That ‘C U Next Tuesday’ has killed human beings that are in our ranks of our service.”
Santilli alleged Clinton was involved in drug trafficking in Arkansas and the killing of U.S. troops overseas.
“I want to shoot her right in the vagina and I don’t want her to die right away,” he added. “I want her to feel the pain and I want to look her in the eyes and I want to say, on behalf of all Americans that you’ve killed, on behalf of the Navy SEALS, the families of Navy SEAL Team Six who were involved in the fake hunt down of this Obama, Obama bin Laden thing.
“That whole fake scenario, because these Navy SEALS know the truth, they killed them all. On behalf of all of those people, I’m supporting our troops by saying we need to try, convict, and shoot Hillary Clinton in the vagina.”
That’s what that guy thinks about.
“That (epithet) has killed human beings that are in our ranks of our service.”
But nowhere near as many Bush II. I wonder what Santilli wants to do with him? And why do I suspect the answer is, “Give him a medal for being a conservative male”?
Doesn’t that constitute a threat?
Why shoot her in the vagina, of all places? It’s neither going to be the most painful nor the most deadly. Just kidding. I know exactly why.
What a disgusting creep!
He should be a bit more honest with himself about the motives underlying his obsessions.
“I wonder what Santilli wants to do with him?”
Several of the reports say that Santilli has called for several members of the Bush family to be “tried, convicted and shot” for treason and possibly the Kennedy assasination. Calling this person “right wing” is about as accurate as calling Animal Liberation Front terrorists “left wing”.
“Miss”?
Huh?? They just killed Seal Team 6, the toughest guys around??? Just like that!?! Somebody’s been watching too many war fantasy sci-fi flicks.
I wonder where this guy gets his information from. Why does he blame Hillary Clinton for anything? Why does he want to shoot her in the vagina (aside from the fact that he’s a misogynist through and through; I wonder what the women in his life have to say about what he’s said)?
He is reflecting the values of Polite Society. “If you have nothing nice to say, say nothing at all.” It’s not nice that is desired by mothers but rude truth that they want to prohibit. Antisocial deceit is hardly decent but it is polite. He’s reflecting the values of Polite Society: spew vile hatred and it’s fine because only the truth is rude. #freebradley
To blame the corrupted values of Polite Society on men would require a concession that mothers are not needed to raise children. Which one is it? It can’t be both. Mothers who embrace misogyny dictate cultural values to their children and girls who embrace misogyny dictate societal values to suitors. Every man has a mother, and this world was not created by orphans or bastards but by the sons of the mothers who would label a baby born out of wedlock with a hateful slur, in an attempt to stigmatise a newborn.
This world has always reflected the value systems of those kinds of mothers. I hear women talk about patriarchal society a lot but wouldn’t that just be orgies and sports? What motive would men have for war and slavery?
There’s a lot of women hatred in this world. Women will inexplicably claim the hatred is from men but it doesn’t make sense. Men aren’t competing with women but competing to impress women. The hatred burns from another source.
These hate-filled women (who hate their betters for making them look bad) are going to breed children. That women would fight for their right to do that is a given. It sure does explain why everyone is so combative, fighting shadows and destroying the world for no reason. Hate is love, by the way. Everyone is confused.
Love for one of these haters = hatred for everyone she hates. Cue war.
“Men aren’t competing with women”
Riiiiight. Because women don’t compete for jobs, elected offices or anything else…on the planet that only exists in your head. :/
What in hell is Jonny Vincent trying to say? Is he actually blaming all the troubles of the world, including wars and misogyny, on mothers? Is he claiming that more women are guilty of misogyny than men?
Wow.
Susan,
Yeah… I’m not sure which was worse – the topic of the OP or what Jonny Vincent was tyring to tie to the post by quoting a portion of it at the beginning of his comment (or whatever the fuck that was).
Whoah. Did Pete Santilli really honestly say that? Is he really serious? (Jaw dropped. Gast flabbered.)
I Am NOT A Lawyer but I’m pretty sure there’s no such thing as a judicial sentence of being shot in the vagina.
Capital punishment in some US states (& federally?) sure, but usually that’s by lethal injection and definitely not the vagina shooting and slow torture method.
Also its Hillary Rodham Clinton he means I think. If he can’t even get her name right ..
Where the &*^%$@#$! does this slimeball get the idea that Hillary Clinton was somehow involved in killing navy SEALs? I seriously haven’t heard of that conspiracy theory before and don’t get how it could possibly work or why anyone could possibly think that was the case.
Double typo in Osama original (unoriginal really in another sense but y’know what I mean hoefully?) to him there I gather?
@12. Susan : “What in hell is Jonny Vincent trying to say?”
Beats me.
Vince Foster!
Vince Foster!
Vince Foster!
Also as Navy SEAL Team 6 deboarded their helicopters they were shot down by Hillary Clinton’s Secret Gestapo squad!
The TRUTH is out there!
I WANT TO BELIEVE!!!
Hmmm…
Must have used too many caps.
My snark is stuck in moderation.
🙁
Your snark is free!
@11,12,13,14: Perhaps you’d care to read what I wrote again prior to feigning illiteracy to avoid answering a direct question. I suspect I know where you picked up that ‘trick’ of avoidance; but I’m on your side. Unless you’re purely evil, I suppose; then you will be combative as I’m merely an abolitionist.
Are mothers responsible for the children they raise or not?
If they’re responsible, universal retrenchment is warranted because the quality of human they’re dumping on Society is unacceptably malicious, combative and inhumane.
If they’re not responsible, universal retrenchment is warranted because they’re fraudulently asserting that children need mothers (and lies) to raise them Right.
We all know the truth; mothers need children. I can even prove this with irrefutable evidence but of course no one is confused. There’s a difference (only a sliver of one) between ignorance and evil. We all know the truth about why women need men to take care of them; or at least, women certainly know all about shame and what it’s used for. No doubt you’ll continue to feign incomprehension but why are the illiterate and uncomprehending being given responsibility for the emotional education of children?