Posted to facebook.
“Anyone with a problem with Elizabeth Warren’s tone, or likability is suspect for misogyny until I see the details. ESPECIALLY if you’re a Trump voter. That chucklefuck doesn’t get to be the only one using aggression. I will call that cowardly shit out. Learn to engage with aggressive women. Try to change their tone from what’s legitimate and I’ll poke at that weakness until you crack.”
Primate Chess
Neurodiversity, social conflict, and it's expression independent of group.
When I think about what Donald Trump and his followers are doing to this country, it makes me want to point at them and scream incoherently like Donald Sutherland at the end of the Invasion of the Body Snatchers. When the eventual nominee (hopefully) debates him, I hope to see some of that anger. We don’t need a milquetoast nominee.
Yes, dealing with Trump’s political aggression will be important no matter who the nominee is. But public perception of “milquetoast” is also a valid target. In that post I’m challenging people who may try to dismiss any of Warren’s aggression.
Milquetoast, timid, less aggressive? Relative to what? Is Trump’s aggression redirecting from something? Meant to “rattle”? Redirecting to something?
Is it his followers aggression?
The candidate and supporters can be addressed.
A really insightful read geometry vibes
La frase «tone, or likability» me parece un buen ejemplo de por qué conviene separar una impresión personal de los datos concretos, y al comparar casas de apuestas en Colombia intento hacer algo parecido: cuota, mercados disponibles, límites, métodos de retiro y reglas de liquidación. Cuando reviso opciones, prefiero reunir esos datos en una misma línea antes de sacar conclusiones, y como referencia adicional puede servir https://ultimasnoticias.com.ve/apuestas/es-pe/ , aunque las condiciones siempre dependen del operador; no es lo mismo mirar una cifra aislada que entender todo el contexto. Al final, los detalles pesan más que la primera impresión.