I’ll be going through some questions at 12 Central. You can watch it here! You can leave new questions in the comments (or on youtube)! You can berate me for my errors! It’ll be fun, he says, as he prepares to expose himself.
OMG ATHIEST PZ MEYERS JUST SAID EATING BABIES IS FINE
/predictable creationist response
Seriously: thank you indeed. Very thoughtful answers. Educational and entertaining.
johnleesays
Thank you for your answer, PZ. My babies might have made a nice snack a few years ago, but I wouldn’t want to try it now – I might end up in a bit of a stew.
rietpluimsays
Creation Today hasn’t responded yet, have they?
tezcatsays
Creationists remind me of cats. Even though I really like cats, they cannot extrapolate at all. If you try to point something out to a cat all they will do is investigate the end of your finger. Similarly, if you point out to a creationist that you can make a great dane and a chihuahua out of a wolf in a relatively short period of time, they will not be able to extrapolate that into the possibility of a new species.
Holmssays
As a reply to the first question, the one posed by johnlee, it might be useful to point to Kangaroo mothers, who have the very unusual (unique…?) ability to selectively pause or even terminate the gestation process, depending on the maturity of the young they may already have in their pouch (which can only have one occupant at a time) and the scarcity of food supply.
lesherbsays
PZ, while the questions & your answers were great, I had a ball reading the captioning included. ?
monadsays
Thank you for your answers! I will try and look more into the sources you offer.
gijoelsays
Probably out of your area of expertise, but how well do computational genetic algorithms in computer science mimic actual evolutionary forces? Do they take some short cuts that don’t fit real world evolutionary processes. Also Scott Manley has an interesting video on Space Invaders clone that uses genetic algorithms.
J Bowen says
Thank you, PZ.
rietpluim says
OMG ATHIEST PZ MEYERS JUST SAID EATING BABIES IS FINE
/predictable creationist response
Seriously: thank you indeed. Very thoughtful answers. Educational and entertaining.
johnlee says
Thank you for your answer, PZ. My babies might have made a nice snack a few years ago, but I wouldn’t want to try it now – I might end up in a bit of a stew.
rietpluim says
Creation Today hasn’t responded yet, have they?
tezcat says
Creationists remind me of cats. Even though I really like cats, they cannot extrapolate at all. If you try to point something out to a cat all they will do is investigate the end of your finger. Similarly, if you point out to a creationist that you can make a great dane and a chihuahua out of a wolf in a relatively short period of time, they will not be able to extrapolate that into the possibility of a new species.
Holms says
As a reply to the first question, the one posed by johnlee, it might be useful to point to Kangaroo mothers, who have the very unusual (unique…?) ability to selectively pause or even terminate the gestation process, depending on the maturity of the young they may already have in their pouch (which can only have one occupant at a time) and the scarcity of food supply.
lesherb says
PZ, while the questions & your answers were great, I had a ball reading the captioning included. ?
monad says
Thank you for your answers! I will try and look more into the sources you offer.
gijoel says
Probably out of your area of expertise, but how well do computational genetic algorithms in computer science mimic actual evolutionary forces? Do they take some short cuts that don’t fit real world evolutionary processes. Also Scott Manley has an interesting video on Space Invaders clone that uses genetic algorithms.
James Burtoft says
Thanks for taking the time there, PZ. Long time stalk, now second time commenter.