I remember seeing them in a research station on Heligoland. They were the first ever organism (and the last) that geve me the creeps for some reason. All wriggly, but no head.
chigau (同じ)says
Holy Crap.
Scientists really are geeks!
'Tis Himself, OM.says
A lancet? It doesn’t look anything like a British medical journal.
Harumph! Harumph, I say.
Nerdettesays
Amphioxus… thinking he’s so cool with his notochord…
Tyrant of Skepsissays
Grab your tunicates and lancelets, and come join the notocohort!
sorry…
chezjakesays
sings:
It’s a long way to amphioxus,
It’s a long way to us.
It’s a long way from amphioxus
To the meanest human cuss.
Goodbye to fins and gill slits,
Hello lungs and hair.
It’s a long way from amphioxus
But we came from there.
/singing
First learned in 1959 from Prof. James Malcolm Moulton who taught me Comp. Anat., Histology, Embryology, and Marine Biology at Bowdoin College.
joefelsensteinsays
From Joe Felsenstein:
For a more detailed history of the Amphioxus Song, see my web site on it, which you will find here. It dates to 1921 and it is known who wrote the verses, where and when, and I even show an image of his own typed 1921 lyrics sheet. Plus some photographs of him and his family that I got when I visited his daughter a few years ago.
ChasCPetersonsays
Branchiostoma, actually, but it screws the scansion.
Cuttlefishsays
Dammit, Chezjake, you beat me to it! I’ve had that memorized since high school!
evadersays
Apparently the white ‘backbone’ looking things… are it’s gonads…
Just thought I’d add that amazing piece of information to this discussion.
richarddawkinssays
The Amphioxus song has always vaguely irritated me, because a better lesson to learn from this lovely little creature is that it is a MODERN animal and we are not descended from it because it is our exact contemporary. It is PRIMITIVE, meaning that it resembles our common ancestor, that is, it hasn’t changed much in evolution. But so many people think of evolution as running from one modern animal to another, it is worth using Amphioxus to plug the opposite point.
Denephew Ogvorbis, OMsays
Hmm. Never heard that version. Then again, I am a history major, so there’s lots I don’t know.
In reply to rucharddawkins (I assume the real one, hi Richard) who pointed out that “we are not descended from it because it is our exact contemporary” I want to make clear that I am probably older than any individual amphioxus. The point is valid, and yes, we should emphasize it.
But we’re stuck with the song for one simple reason: biologists are lousy at writing funny songs! Physicists and mathematicians are much wittier. Our funny songs are rare exceptions, so let’s cherish them, even as we explain that they aren’t quite right.
Serendipitydawg (Physicists are such a pain sometimes)says
Katie Melua’s Nine Million Bicycles took some flak from Simon Singh for “We are 12 billion light-years from the edge. That’s a guess — no-one can ever say it’s true” and the Pfft says:
Melua and Singh met, and Melua re-recorded a tongue-in-cheek version of the song that had been written by Singh:
“We are 13.7 billion light-years from the edge of the observable universe; that’s a good estimate with well-defined error bars/and with the available information, I predict that I will always be with you”.
Now’s your chance to set the record straight, Richard!
Serendipitydawg (Physicists are such a pain sometimes)says
I also can’t wait to see how high flounder.com’s page counter goes… 16,400 and counting.
Right, and it’s why I can’t get too worked up about the taxonomic hairsplitting of amphioxus vs. branchiostoma vs. lancelet. The song isn’t about the modern beast, it can’t be, because those creatures are very distant from us and not on our direct line of descent — it’s about the ancient acraniate grade.
And that’s why biologists don’t write funny songs. We get all hung up on those important subtleties.
Tyrant of Skepsissays
“We are 13.7 billion light-years from the edge of the observable universe; that’s a good estimate with well-defined error bars/and with the available information, I predict that I will always be with you”.
Oh come on Dr. Singh, we’re not 13.7 billion light years away from the edge of the observable universe, it’s much further than that because of the cosmological expansion. Particle physicists… tz tz tz :)
imnotandreisays
@#11, & #16
There’s a reason we’ve changed the lyrics at our house, to these two last lines:
THough it’s a long long way from Amphioxus,
A common ancestor we share!
John Phillips, FCDsays
Tyrant in Skepsis, the clue is in the word observable.
fishsci says
A Lancelet! Cool!
I remember seeing them in a research station on Heligoland. They were the first ever organism (and the last) that geve me the creeps for some reason. All wriggly, but no head.
chigau (同じ) says
Holy Crap.
Scientists really are geeks!
'Tis Himself, OM. says
A lancet? It doesn’t look anything like a British medical journal.
Harumph! Harumph, I say.
Nerdette says
Amphioxus… thinking he’s so cool with his notochord…
Tyrant of Skepsis says
Grab your tunicates and lancelets, and come join the notocohort!
sorry…
chezjake says
sings:
It’s a long way to amphioxus,
It’s a long way to us.
It’s a long way from amphioxus
To the meanest human cuss.
Goodbye to fins and gill slits,
Hello lungs and hair.
It’s a long way from amphioxus
But we came from there.
/singing
First learned in 1959 from Prof. James Malcolm Moulton who taught me Comp. Anat., Histology, Embryology, and Marine Biology at Bowdoin College.
joefelsenstein says
From Joe Felsenstein:
For a more detailed history of the Amphioxus Song, see my web site on it, which you will find here. It dates to 1921 and it is known who wrote the verses, where and when, and I even show an image of his own typed 1921 lyrics sheet. Plus some photographs of him and his family that I got when I visited his daughter a few years ago.
ChasCPeterson says
Branchiostoma, actually, but it screws the scansion.
Cuttlefish says
Dammit, Chezjake, you beat me to it! I’ve had that memorized since high school!
evader says
Apparently the white ‘backbone’ looking things… are it’s gonads…
Just thought I’d add that amazing piece of information to this discussion.
richarddawkins says
The Amphioxus song has always vaguely irritated me, because a better lesson to learn from this lovely little creature is that it is a MODERN animal and we are not descended from it because it is our exact contemporary. It is PRIMITIVE, meaning that it resembles our common ancestor, that is, it hasn’t changed much in evolution. But so many people think of evolution as running from one modern animal to another, it is worth using Amphioxus to plug the opposite point.
Denephew Ogvorbis, OM says
Hmm. Never heard that version. Then again, I am a history major, so there’s lots I don’t know.
And a Lancelet? For taking out small boils?
Joe Felsenstein says
In reply to rucharddawkins (I assume the real one, hi Richard) who pointed out that “we are not descended from it because it is our exact contemporary” I want to make clear that I am probably older than any individual amphioxus. The point is valid, and yes, we should emphasize it.
But we’re stuck with the song for one simple reason: biologists are lousy at writing funny songs! Physicists and mathematicians are much wittier. Our funny songs are rare exceptions, so let’s cherish them, even as we explain that they aren’t quite right.
Serendipitydawg (Physicists are such a pain sometimes) says
Katie Melua’s Nine Million Bicycles took some flak from Simon Singh for “We are 12 billion light-years from the edge. That’s a guess — no-one can ever say it’s true” and the Pfft says:
Now’s your chance to set the record straight, Richard!
Serendipitydawg (Physicists are such a pain sometimes) says
I also can’t wait to see how high flounder.com’s page counter goes… 16,400 and counting.
PZ Myers says
Right, and it’s why I can’t get too worked up about the taxonomic hairsplitting of amphioxus vs. branchiostoma vs. lancelet. The song isn’t about the modern beast, it can’t be, because those creatures are very distant from us and not on our direct line of descent — it’s about the ancient acraniate grade.
And that’s why biologists don’t write funny songs. We get all hung up on those important subtleties.
Tyrant of Skepsis says
Oh come on Dr. Singh, we’re not 13.7 billion light years away from the edge of the observable universe, it’s much further than that because of the cosmological expansion. Particle physicists… tz tz tz :)
imnotandrei says
@#11, & #16
There’s a reason we’ve changed the lyrics at our house, to these two last lines:
THough it’s a long long way from Amphioxus,
A common ancestor we share!
John Phillips, FCD says
Tyrant in Skepsis, the clue is in the word observable.
John Phillips, FCD says
oops, sorry, of not in.
frodesteensen says
Why, it’s an Amphioxus!