You’re right I’m jealous. If I write a crap book and lace it with archaisms to appear sophisticated, nobody will publish it.
oddjobsays
Oh please….. When he wrote that there was nothing else on the market at all like it! In fact, he had enormous difficulty getting it published because no publishing house thought they’d make any money from it because there was nothing else like it.
brightmoonsays
drat now im hungry
Ricsays
Lord of the Rings is UNDERrated.
Elf Eyesays
“lace it with archaisms”
‘Lace’ is hardly the appropriate term. Tolkien created an entire universe in which to set his tales, complete with a geography, a mythology, and histories and languages for multiple peoples. My students were in awe last semester as they contemplated Tolkien’s universe, created over decades while he simultaneously taught Old and Middle English literature. I’m with Ric: LOTR is underrated, in part because it is associated with the ‘genre’ literature inspired by its unexpected success.
I think LOTR is underrated as well, but in some senses it is considered to be greater than it is. More than there are hints of equality, there are hints of racism. Sexism is portrayed, opposed by a couple strong female characters (note: I am NOT talking about Arwen Evenstar, I mean Galadriel and Eowyn), but in the end the status quo is maintained. The story is written entirely from the victors point of view, and the view it gives of reality is horrible grim. This is understandable, as Tolkien wrote the darkest part of the story during WWII, but he ended up writing an anti-enlightenment moral to the story. The solution to the dilemma of a technology (or knowledge) that can be used for good or evil is to simply destroy it.
Nevertheless, LOTR is a fabulous universe with a depth of reality and unexplained mysteries that I find incredibly engrossing. I think LOTR is less understood than it is over-rated or under-rated.
Whatever, people. Vast candy dioramas of imaginary battles are totally underrated, it should be obvious.
I’m the one who submitted this to BoingBoing and TheOneRing.net, and it’s great to see someone who did something bizarre simply for the crazy joy of it get some credit. It’s beautiful not in spite of the strangeness, or the futility, but rather because of them.
jufulusays
I’m with raincoaster. It’s not about the final product (however cool and awesome), its about the fun making it. I can imagine everyone giggling and laughing as each new idea about what to do next came up. Life doesn’t get better than that. That is a life.
K. Engelssays
If Star Wars in Middle Earth, er I mean Eragon, can get published, anything can.
FishyFred says
You have got to be kidding me.
Paguroidea says
What an exciting project on break! After all that work it would make a person feel guilty to eat it.
Alon Levy says
Lord of the Rings is totally overrated.
oddjob says
LOL!!!!!!!!
Now that’s someone who needs a life! (And I have a leather-bound, acid-free paper edition of LOTR, so it’s not as though I’m not a fan…..)
Inoculated Mind says
Alon Levy is totally jealous. This puts all my candy castles to shame.
Alon Levy says
You’re right I’m jealous. If I write a crap book and lace it with archaisms to appear sophisticated, nobody will publish it.
oddjob says
Oh please….. When he wrote that there was nothing else on the market at all like it! In fact, he had enormous difficulty getting it published because no publishing house thought they’d make any money from it because there was nothing else like it.
brightmoon says
drat now im hungry
Ric says
Lord of the Rings is UNDERrated.
Elf Eye says
“lace it with archaisms”
‘Lace’ is hardly the appropriate term. Tolkien created an entire universe in which to set his tales, complete with a geography, a mythology, and histories and languages for multiple peoples. My students were in awe last semester as they contemplated Tolkien’s universe, created over decades while he simultaneously taught Old and Middle English literature. I’m with Ric: LOTR is underrated, in part because it is associated with the ‘genre’ literature inspired by its unexpected success.
Inoculated Mind says
I think LOTR is underrated as well, but in some senses it is considered to be greater than it is. More than there are hints of equality, there are hints of racism. Sexism is portrayed, opposed by a couple strong female characters (note: I am NOT talking about Arwen Evenstar, I mean Galadriel and Eowyn), but in the end the status quo is maintained. The story is written entirely from the victors point of view, and the view it gives of reality is horrible grim. This is understandable, as Tolkien wrote the darkest part of the story during WWII, but he ended up writing an anti-enlightenment moral to the story. The solution to the dilemma of a technology (or knowledge) that can be used for good or evil is to simply destroy it.
Nevertheless, LOTR is a fabulous universe with a depth of reality and unexplained mysteries that I find incredibly engrossing. I think LOTR is less understood than it is over-rated or under-rated.
Inoculated Mind says
Actually, if you write a crap book, people will publish it. Just find one of the companies that publishes creationist literature.
raincoaster says
Whatever, people. Vast candy dioramas of imaginary battles are totally underrated, it should be obvious.
I’m the one who submitted this to BoingBoing and TheOneRing.net, and it’s great to see someone who did something bizarre simply for the crazy joy of it get some credit. It’s beautiful not in spite of the strangeness, or the futility, but rather because of them.
jufulu says
I’m with raincoaster. It’s not about the final product (however cool and awesome), its about the fun making it. I can imagine everyone giggling and laughing as each new idea about what to do next came up. Life doesn’t get better than that. That is a life.
K. Engels says
If Star Wars in Middle Earth, er I mean Eragon, can get published, anything can.
Matt M says
That is so sweet!