Mixed race in the 2020 US Census

TL;DR: The 2020 US Census shows a very large increase in the “Two or More Races” group. However, at least some of this likely has to do with changes in the question design and coding procedures, and shifting constructions of race.

The US Census construction of Race

When the US Census asks about race and ethnicity, it tries to reflect the way that racial/ethnic identity is constructed in the United States, but it also has to obey certain constraints. As a result there are some outstanding differences between race as it is constructed by US residents, and race as it is constructed by the US Census. For example, Middle Eastern Americans often do not identify as White, and are not perceived as White (and I suspect this perception has increased since 9/11), but in the US Census they are still classified as white.

Another outstanding difference is in how the US Census defines “race” vs “ethnicity”. According to the Census, “Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin” and its negation are the only ethnic categories, and are excluded from the racial categories. I can say from my own experience with surveys, that this system is really weird, and causes no end of confusion among respondents.

The big headline about the 2020 Census is the declining White population, not just as a percentage, but also in absolute numbers. But this can be a bit confusing, because there are multiple White categories. The “White Alone” category refers to people for whom White is their only racial category (but they may or may not be of Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin), and has declined from 72.4% in 2010 to 61.6% in 2020. But if you look at all people who identified as White, regardless of other racial identification, there was a more modest decrease from 74.8% to 71%. And, if you take the White Alone group and exclude Hispanic/Latino/Spanish people, the shift was from 63.7% to 57.8%. And if you exclude groups like Jewish Americans, Middle Eastern Americans, and North African Americans, then we just don’t know because the Census classifies them as White.

These are all big shifts, but the most drastic was in the “White Alone” group, including those of Hispanic/Latino/Spanish origin. It appears that a greater fraction of these people are identifying not just as White, but also as another race.

Two or More Races

The “Two or More Races” category is a US Census construction, composed of people who identify with more than one of the racial categories. There are six racial categories: White, Black or African American, American Indian and Alaska Native, Asian, Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander, and Some Other Race. Identifying as more than one race within a single racial category doesn’t count, it needs to be at least two of the six major categories.

If you think about it, this category is a bit arbitrary. For example, White Hispanic people are not Two or More Races, because the Census does not consider Hispanic to be a race (with exceptions, but we’ll get to that). It also depends on how individuals construct their racial identities. Black Americans, and Native Americans typically have some White ancestry, but may think of themselves as just Black or just Native American, and may say so in the Census. In contrast, it’s hard for me to imagine a lot of White/Asian people marking themselves as Asian only.

The Two or More Races category increased from 2.9% in 2010 to 10.2% in 2020. Within this category, 57% are specifically the combination White and Some Other Race. 12% are White and American Indian or Alaska Native. 9% are White and Black or African American, and 8% are White and Asian.

The big question is, what is Some Other Race? 90% of the people who identify as Some Other Race have Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish ethnicity, so the best guess is that people are identifying with a Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish group as a race, not just as an ethnicity. When they do so, the US Census classifies that as “Some Other Race”.  Although the Census instructs people, “For this census, Hispanic origins are not races,” that really doesn’t stop people, and good for them.  It’s like what I said about Q8 of my Cat Person or Dog Person survey, if you include prescriptive definitions in your survey, respondents will be confused and may outright disagree.

Question Design

This could be a shift in how people are identifying–perhaps the Census’s prescriptive delineation of ethnicity and race increasingly disagrees with people. On the other hand, it may also have to do with a change in question design. Here are the 2010 and 2020 race questions side by side:

The 2010 and 2020 us census race questions side by side

This is pure speculation, but I think asking people who select White to be more specific likely prompts people to write answers like “Mexican” or “Argentinian”.  The Census is not abundantly clear on this point, but I suspect the Census is classifying these as Some Other Race, even if they’re written underneath “White”.

In addition to the change in question design, there’s also an improvement in how they code written responses. In 2010, they coded up to two categories per text box, and Hispanic/Latino/Spanish categories were given lower priority because those are not considered races. In 2020, they coded up to six categories, and they prioritize left to right. So it’s possible that even if people answered identically in 2010 and 2020, they would be classified differently.

My next question, is what’s happening with the White and American Indian or Alaska Native? Is it a shift in population, shift in identity, or a shift in question design and coding? I just don’t know.

The US Census shows an increase in racial and ethnic diversity in the past decade. But we should keep in mind that at least some of the diversity was already there, and is only newly revealed. And there is yet more diversity that the US Census continues to conceal.


  1. brucegee1962 says

    A friend of mine with Polish ancestors argues that the white majority will never actually diminish in this country because more and more races will be subsumed under the white label, just as the Irish, his ancestors, Czechs, and other Eastern Europeans went from being considered non-white to white over the past century. He thinks that before long, Asians and many Hispanics will be considered white for all intents and purposes. I think his point is that whiteness is a political category more than it is an ethnic one.

  2. says

    The subsumption of Irish, Czechs, and other groups under White is an interesting process that I don’t understand, and could very well happen again. However, I feel that the process can go in both directions. For example, in a quick look at the history of the US Census, Mexicans were classified as white, except in the 1930 census, and then the present system with two separate questions was introduced in 1970. Also as far as I can tell, Irish were always classified as White in the census, suggesting that they never quite as non-White as Asians are presently.

  3. brucegee1962 says

    @2 Siggy
    There is also the interesting question of whether the term “Hispanic” covers people who come from the actual country of Spain. I had one such friend who had a phone interview for an academic job where they seemed quite positive, and he thought it had a lot to do with his Spanish accent. When he showed up in person they seemed disappointed by the fact that he was paler than they were.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *