The bishops of the military will retain their grip on the prosecution or non-prosecution of sexual assault cases.
An ambitious bill seeking to stem the rise of sexual assaults in the military died Thursday after senators from both parties refused to limit the role of commanding officers in deciding whether to prosecute such cases.
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) pushed the issue to prominence during this congressional session, arguing on behalf of victims who testified that they feared retaliation for pressing assault allegations up the military chain of command. Her bill — which won support from 17 of the 20 women in the Senate — would have shifted sexual assault investigations to military prosecutors.
Instead senators advanced a competing bill sponsored by Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), who agreed with military brass that removing commanders from investigations would undermine their authority with troops.
And failing to prosecute sexual assault won’t undermine their authority with troops? Which troops are we talking about? Are we assuming that most of the troops are sexual assaulters or fans of sexual assault? Are we assuming that a permissive attitude toward sexual assault is a majority view in the military? If so…might that undermine the authority of the military overall? Might it encourage endemic sexual assault in the military?
The scope of the problem was underscored late Thursday when the Army confirmed it was investigating its top sexual assault prosecutor, Lt. Col. Joseph Morse, on allegations of making unwanted sexual advances two years ago to a lawyer who worked for him.
“We can confirm that this matter is currently under investigation and that the individual in question has been suspended from duties, pending the outcome of the investigation,” an Army spokesperson said.
Also Thursday, Army Brig. Gen. Jeffrey A. Sinclair, one of the highest-ranking officers ever to face a court-martial, pleaded guilty at the start of his trial to several charges, including having an illicit affair with a female captain, impeding an investigation and pressuring other female officers to send him nude photos.
See what I mean?
Maureen Brian says
Egg-xactly!
Pierce R. Butler says
One one-star ain’t squat, statistically: late last month The U.S. Army disqualified 588 members of the military from serving as sexual assault counselors, recruiters or drill sergeants due to previous infractions…
Marcus Ranum says
The scope of the problem was underscored late Thursday when the Army confirmed it was investigating its top sexual assault prosecutor, Lt. Col. Joseph Morse, on allegations of making unwanted sexual advances two years ago to a lawyer who worked for him.
“Underscored” is hardly the word for it. “Turned into a farce” works better.
I notice that Morse’s defense is, in a nutshell, “Bitches be lyin'” anyone want to make a bet whether it will work?
karmacat says
I work at a VA and there is a special program just for military sexual assaults. It is ridiculous that there are so many victims who need this This should embarrass the military but clearly isn’t. Any time a soldier is assaulted is a failure for that leader. There are probably more male victims in addition to female victims than we know about. It is doubly hard for a man to admit to being a victim.
sailor1031 says
“Foxes given command of hen-house”. More news at 11.
iknklast says
What the hell is wrong with those other three women? Too Republican? Too much of military hawks? Don’t want to appear “weak” in a man’s world? Damn.
rnilsson says
Trigger warning!
Not a unique story, alas:
The biggest police scandal in Sweden’s history (Aftonbladet 23 Jan 2014)
So, this is a man in senior command who made his carreer lecturing about gender equality issues and against sexual assault and abuse, while he was himself very actively, and increasingly, engaging in such activities, including escalated violence, abuse of minors, etc. He refused to take any part in the treatment offered during incarceration but was nonetheless released on probation after the normal two-thirds of time. He is out there now, unrelenting.
Many people find this wrong on so many counts and in so many ways. Reneging on good faith not least among them. It would not surprise me much if someone one day takes an axe or a lead pipe to this shining example. Not that I approve, mind you. But feelings are a bit heated around here.