The Sackler family epitomizes greed and sleaziness

I have written many times before about the Sackler family that made billions of dollars by pushing their company Purdue Pharmaceuticals to get doctors to overprescribe the opioid painkiller OxyContin and making the dosage stronger, resulting in the massive drug addiction problem we have now that have caused so many deaths.

Investigative reporter Patrick Radden Keefe has written a new book Empire of Pain about the Sackler family and he was interviewed on the radio program Fresh Air about how the family went to great efforts to push the drug while at the same time keeping their name separate from the company so that they could build up their reputations as philanthropists and have their name attached to many public and university buildings. He explained how they are trying to shield their personal fortunes from the many lawsuits against them by shifting company money into their private accounts and then putting the company into bankruptcy.

OxyContin has been a fantastically profitable drug. It’s generated some $35 billion in revenue since its introduction in the 1990s. And what’s happened is just in the last few years, you’ve had this gathering storm of lawsuits seeking to hold, initially just the company, Purdue Pharma, but then eventually the family as well, responsible. Purdue and the Sacklers did this really interesting thing where the Sacklers at a certain point put the company into bankruptcy, because they had been taking so much money out of the company for so many years and it was now facing all these lawsuits. And so the company ends up with something like a billion dollars in cash and assets, and the Sacklers put it into bankruptcy. They don’t declare bankruptcy themselves. And, in fact, we know from their own records they’ve taken more than $10 billion out of the company really over the course of just a decade or so. So it’s this strange situation in which the company is bankrupt — the family financially is doing just fine.

There is now a law being proposed in Congress, actually called The Sackler Act, that seeks to prevent people from doing what the Sacklers are trying to do to use the bankruptcy laws shield their ill-gotten gains.

Seth Meyers also interviewed Keefe.

UPDATE: The Guardian has a review of the book and describes how the Sacklers used their money and influence to ward off prosecutions and escape with small fines.

The Sacklers did not cooperate. Indeed, they sought to derail publication. Keefe raises the possibility he was placed under surveillance, an attempt to intimidate him and his family. Nonetheless, the Sacklers’ indifference and smugness rise off the pages like steam from a sewer.

In one 1996 email, Richard Sackler, Purdue’s chairman and president, demands the company become as feared as a “tiger with claws, teeth and balls”. Asked repeatedly at deposition years later if Purdue played any role in the opioid crisis, he steadfastly answers: “I don’t believe so.”

A cousin, Kathe Sackler, actually boasts that OxyContin was a “very good medicine” and a “safe medicine”. She also claims credit for coming up with the “idea”. But she doesn’t end there.

Confronted with the question, “Do you recognize that hundreds of thousands of Americans have become addicted to OxyContin?”, she can only muster: “I don’t know the answer to that.”.

The Sacklers agreed to pay a $225m civil penalty, little more than the 2% they had taken from Purdue. But no one would be prosecuted. Asked why the government had not brought criminal charges against the Sacklers, Jeffrey Rosen, Bill Barr’s deputy attorney general, declined to say.

The government, Keefe writes, was “so deferential toward the Sacklers that nobody even bothered to question them”.

They should all be in jail.


  1. says

    Kennedy, Carnegie, Rockefeller, Sackler, the American oligarchs love to try to pass themselves off as philanthropists -- but only after a life of labor abuse or corruption and leaving a legacy of frogspawn to raise with power and unearned privilege.

  2. publicola says

    Carnegie thought he could erase the blood and stench of his inhumanity by buying off the public. But history hasn’t forgotten how he hired the Pinkertons, ( may as well have been the Peeky Blinders ), to break the Homestead strike by killing striking workers. So many lives were ended and ruined by Carnegie. They should re-name Carnegie Hall and call it Steel-Workers Hall.

  3. says

    Carnegie was worse than that -- he aimed his philanthropy solely at the social class he wished to elevate to. I.e: he was an arriviste not a philanthropist. A philanthropist would have opened hospitals for the steel-workers dying of heavy metals and cancers, or schools for their widows and orphans. Instead he used his wealth to try to wow New York’s gilded elite. What an asshole. One of his workers said “the closest that man ever gets to a puddle-pit will be when he dies and goes to hell.”

  4. Rob Grigjanis says

    The Sacklers are a symptom, like a particularly pustulent sore. Put them in jail, confiscate their wealth. That’d be great (if unlikely), but it wouldn’t change a damn thing.

  5. Rob Grigjanis says

    This may seem off-topic, but it’s not really:

    The owners of 12 of the richest European soccer clubs (6 English, 3 Spanish, 3 Italian) want to start their own closed, breakaway Super League. The sole purpose is the further enrichment of their scumbag billionaire owners.

    As things stand now, the wealthiest clubs help fund the lower levels of the sport, and clubs in the lower tiers always have a chance to break into higher leagues. Of course it’s still a system which favours rich clubs, but this would make a dodgy system far worse.

    This is a giant “fuck you” to all supporters and national football associations, and a great example of what’s horribly wrong with our society.

  6. Mano Singham says

    Rob @#5,

    Thanks for writing about this. I read the news and was interested but I am not that aware of the various football bodies and how they are related to one another so did not know what to make of it. But I was pretty sure that money was involved. It always is.

  7. deb says

    take a look at Pfizer since COVID. And the CDC and Federal employees that have made millions with their investments in the only companies approved to administer the vaccine. A bit of insider trading? And didn’t Fauci get rich from the Aids meds in the 1980s and 1990s? He managed to patent a drug that was developed by the federal gov’t. How does that work?

    It’s all so corrupt.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *