Time to dig up another fossil. It’s a bird, but it has no connection to the sabre-toothed kitty cat I posted yesterday — this is a 80 million year old bird, Navaornis hestiae, written up in a Nature article, Cretaceous bird from Brazil informs the evolution of the avian skull and brain. It looks like a real bird to me.
It has a fairly big brain, with some differences in structure from modern birds — it has a smaller motor control area, so while it had the capacity for complex behavior, it may not have been as agile in the air as birds today. It’s intermediate in brain complexity between Archaeopteryx and extant birds.
Cambridge invested a bit in publicizing this discovery, with a nice fancy video.
Reginald Selkirk says
Why has evolution not tried a sabre-toothed bird?
Ted Lawry says
One of the things I really love about Archeopteryx is that it had the feathers of a bird, and how, but also the skeleton of a predatory dinosaur. Talk about intermediate fossils! Creatiionists have to talk about Archeopteryx, because even their audience has heard of it. But they never mention its skeleton.
raven says
Archaeopteryx also had jaws with teeth and a long reptilian like tail.
A lot of the early birds had teeth.
StevoR says
@ ^ raven : Archaeopteryx was seemingly very close to Compsognathus. ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compsognathus )
I think I remember a very old Attenborough comparison of their skeletal structure and stuff where they are really close apart from the imprint of fossil fathers but I cannot now find that with preliminary, immediate google-fu failing to find what I hoped & thought I remembered seeing as a kid.