What is Trump fretting over now?
On Tuesday, President Trump hosted Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey in the Oval Office for a closed-door meeting, during which the leader of the free world spent an inordinate amount of time complaining about lost Twitter followers, according to a source familiar with the conversation.
There’s a big problem with Twitter right there — you know weird ol’ @jack really cares about keeping his buddy @realDonaldTrump happy, and @realDonaldTrump really cares about the big number of followers. So much so that this must sting:
Hi @realDonaldTrump. Did you know that Obama has almost twice as many twitter followers as you? I hope no one retweets this. pic.twitter.com/zM0nzLb3i9
— *you're (@RKJ65) April 24, 2019
Yep, 59.9 million vs 106 million. Don’t tell Donald that at least half his followers are hate-reading him.
davidc1 says
Just heard the snatch snatcher is going to be paying us Brits a visit in June .
PZ Myers says
Would you like to keep him?
stwriley says
You have to wonder how many of Trump’s followers are actually Twitterbots.
blf says
Trump is visiting Britain — at least we can enjoy Melania’s contempt:
Snarki, child of Loki says
“Don’t tell Donald that at least half his followers are hate-reading him”
So, like Florida Man, but without the alligators, and less ‘Florida’?
Sounds plausible.
acroyear says
Another 10-15% of his followers are Russian-created twitter-bots that like or retweet instantly, fanning those numbers up.
acroyear says
oh, just saw stwirley’s comment on twitterbots. oops. yeah. that.
lucifersbike says
PZ. We wouldn’t like to keep him in the UK, but we have a few left-over bits of Empire where he could be kept in cold storage. How about South Georgia?
Rich Woods says
@PZ #2:
No, not even in the deepest medieval dungeon left in Britain. His bawling would scare off the ravens even if that dungeon wasn’t underneath the Tower. And where would the country be without London’s ravens? I’ll tell you: Brexit. Bloody Brexit. Do you hate us that much? Gah.
quotetheunquote says
@Rich Woods #9
In answer to your second question; well, yes, I believe they do … 1776 and all that….
weylguy says
I don’t subscribe to Facebook, Twitter or any of the other stupid social media come-ons, and I never will. They’re not only all a fucking waste of time and effort, but they provide convenient marketing information on dumbed-down Americans who can’t see their country descending into a plutocratic theocracy while they’re busy posting crap on the latest pop singer.
robro says
As I suspected, there are claims that Obama has his own fake followers. The Daily Mail comes up with 19.5 million at some time in the past…I’m not going to click that bait…but that isn’t surprising. Anyone or any-bot can create fake accounts for someone, including Obama as well as Trump. However, if you take away that 10%-15%-20% from Obama, and the 10%-15%-20% from Trump, Obama still wins the count by a landslide.
Trump, sad.
doubtthat says
You know, all other things aside, I just cannot fathom how right wingers and Trump supports develop their priority list. Like, you look around this world and think your time needs to be devoted to who is following you on Twitter?
At least the out of touch Roman Emperors were just fucking and eating lots of food.
I just cannot imagine being president of the United States, having that much power, that much ability to influence the world, and think I needed to get a social media CEO – not to talk about their systems being used for mob violence around the world – but to bitch my follower count wasn’t high enough.
lumipuna says
Aside from the Obama snipe, I heard Twitter has recently been purging many of the fake followers of fake celebrities and political apparatchiks, so it makes sense that Trump would be complaining about lost followers.
davidc1 says
That’s a dreadful thing to say Doc,wot have we ever done to you Americans ?
PZ Myers says
Piers Morgan, for one. At least we sent him back.
nomdeplume says
Perhaps the Brits feel about Trump the way Americans once thought of George III – Donald has Twitter, George had trees.
consciousness razor says
Come on, what do you expect? We can’t control our intense, primal urges any better than you can.
chrislawson says
There’s an argument that Piers Morgan is a greater threat to the NATO alliance than Putin.
Ishikiri says
@weylguy, #11: I’ve done quite a bit of workplace organizing over Facebook, and I know at least one person who met his wife via Twitter. The platforms have grievous problems to be sure, but the social interactions that they facilitate are as valid as anywhere else.
Your contempt for ordinary people is duly noted.
davidc1 says
“Piers Morgan, for one. At least we sent him back.”
Yeah ,well that was because you send Loyd Grossman over here .
@17 At last something from the onion that made me smile .
mamba says
The guy’s president of the United states, arguably one of the most powerful positions on planet Earth, is very rich, famous (for better or worse for the rest of us), and his ego is STILL so fragile that he cares about followers on Twitter???
The guy’s about to meet the Queen of england, and yet he’s upset about Twitter.
Also, what the heck was the CEO of twitter supposed to do about this? He owns Twitter but he doesn’t control the users of it! People either choose to follow this lunatic or they don’t. The CEO is totally irrelevant to this!
Tell me again how someone this ridiculous got to this point without being dragged out in a net again?
ashley says
I sometimes read Trump tweets after hearing about them in the British ‘fake news media’ such as the BBC. As far as I know I have not somehow signed up as a ‘follower’ merely by occasionally viewing the page.