What is Trump fretting over now?
On Tuesday, President Trump hosted Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey in the Oval Office for a closed-door meeting, during which the leader of the free world spent an inordinate amount of time complaining about lost Twitter followers, according to a source familiar with the conversation.
There’s a big problem with Twitter right there — you know weird ol’ @jack really cares about keeping his buddy @realDonaldTrump happy, and @realDonaldTrump really cares about the big number of followers. So much so that this must sting:
Hi @realDonaldTrump. Did you know that Obama has almost twice as many twitter followers as you? I hope no one retweets this. pic.twitter.com/zM0nzLb3i9
— *you're (@RKJ65) April 24, 2019
Yep, 59.9 million vs 106 million. Don’t tell Donald that at least half his followers are hate-reading him.
Just heard the snatch snatcher is going to be paying us Brits a visit in June .
Would you like to keep him?
You have to wonder how many of Trump’s followers are actually Twitterbots.
Trump is visiting Britain — at least we can enjoy Melania’s contempt:
“Don’t tell Donald that at least half his followers are hate-reading him”
So, like Florida Man, but without the alligators, and less ‘Florida’?
Sounds plausible.
Another 10-15% of his followers are Russian-created twitter-bots that like or retweet instantly, fanning those numbers up.
oh, just saw stwirley’s comment on twitterbots. oops. yeah. that.
PZ. We wouldn’t like to keep him in the UK, but we have a few left-over bits of Empire where he could be kept in cold storage. How about South Georgia?
@PZ #2:
No, not even in the deepest medieval dungeon left in Britain. His bawling would scare off the ravens even if that dungeon wasn’t underneath the Tower. And where would the country be without London’s ravens? I’ll tell you: Brexit. Bloody Brexit. Do you hate us that much? Gah.
@Rich Woods #9
In answer to your second question; well, yes, I believe they do … 1776 and all that….
I don’t subscribe to Facebook, Twitter or any of the other stupid social media come-ons, and I never will. They’re not only all a fucking waste of time and effort, but they provide convenient marketing information on dumbed-down Americans who can’t see their country descending into a plutocratic theocracy while they’re busy posting crap on the latest pop singer.
As I suspected, there are claims that Obama has his own fake followers. The Daily Mail comes up with 19.5 million at some time in the past…I’m not going to click that bait…but that isn’t surprising. Anyone or any-bot can create fake accounts for someone, including Obama as well as Trump. However, if you take away that 10%-15%-20% from Obama, and the 10%-15%-20% from Trump, Obama still wins the count by a landslide.
Trump, sad.
You know, all other things aside, I just cannot fathom how right wingers and Trump supports develop their priority list. Like, you look around this world and think your time needs to be devoted to who is following you on Twitter?
At least the out of touch Roman Emperors were just fucking and eating lots of food.
I just cannot imagine being president of the United States, having that much power, that much ability to influence the world, and think I needed to get a social media CEO – not to talk about their systems being used for mob violence around the world – but to bitch my follower count wasn’t high enough.
Aside from the Obama snipe, I heard Twitter has recently been purging many of the fake followers of fake celebrities and political apparatchiks, so it makes sense that Trump would be complaining about lost followers.
That’s a dreadful thing to say Doc,wot have we ever done to you Americans ?
Piers Morgan, for one. At least we sent him back.
Perhaps the Brits feel about Trump the way Americans once thought of George III – Donald has Twitter, George had trees.
Come on, what do you expect? We can’t control our intense, primal urges any better than you can.
There’s an argument that Piers Morgan is a greater threat to the NATO alliance than Putin.
@weylguy, #11: I’ve done quite a bit of workplace organizing over Facebook, and I know at least one person who met his wife via Twitter. The platforms have grievous problems to be sure, but the social interactions that they facilitate are as valid as anywhere else.
Your contempt for ordinary people is duly noted.
“Piers Morgan, for one. At least we sent him back.”
Yeah ,well that was because you send Loyd Grossman over here .
@17 At last something from the onion that made me smile .
The guy’s president of the United states, arguably one of the most powerful positions on planet Earth, is very rich, famous (for better or worse for the rest of us), and his ego is STILL so fragile that he cares about followers on Twitter???
The guy’s about to meet the Queen of england, and yet he’s upset about Twitter.
Also, what the heck was the CEO of twitter supposed to do about this? He owns Twitter but he doesn’t control the users of it! People either choose to follow this lunatic or they don’t. The CEO is totally irrelevant to this!
Tell me again how someone this ridiculous got to this point without being dragged out in a net again?
I sometimes read Trump tweets after hearing about them in the British ‘fake news media’ such as the BBC. As far as I know I have not somehow signed up as a ‘follower’ merely by occasionally viewing the page.