Why we shouldn’t take the Tea Party seriously


I can’t believe we elected any of these hypocritical loons to office anywhere. Look at the shenanigans in Dayton, Ohio.

Kelly Kohls, who was elected in Springboro on a platform of fiscal responsibility two years ago, requested last week the district’s curriculum director look into ways of providing “supplemental” instruction dealing with creationism. Fellow member, Scott Anderson, who was elected with Kohls when the district was struggling financially, supports his colleague’s idea.

“Creationism is a significant part of the history of this country,” Kohls said. “It is an absolutely valid theory and to omit it means we are omitting part of the history of this country.”

That’s not true. It is neither a significant part of our history nor is it a valid “theory” — it doesn’t even deserve the label of theory, since it doesn’t integrate a large number of scientific hypotheses and observations. It doesn’t even deserve to be called a hypothesis, since it’s made in direct contradiction to the evidence. It might best be called a myth, nothing more.

One other fine piece of hypocrisy: she and many Teabaggers are getting elected on promises of fiscal conservativism. Clearly, they didn’t mean it: peddling creationism in the public schools means they’re going down the Dover path, and we all saw how much that cost the school district. This should be seen as a ploy to destroy public education.

Also, how’s this for irony? Kohls filed for bankruptcy. They own a house valued at $450,000 (in Ohio? What kind of mansion did they splurge on?), on which they owe… $829,000. Yeah, she’s a smart money manager.

Comments

  1. says

    Creationism is a significant part of the history of this country

    Hooray for idiocy. Besides, even if it were, so the fuck what? Slavery is a significant part of the history of the USA, but I don’t see any teabaggers advocating slavery (in public at least, he says with his tongue partially in his cheek). It makes me so glad that I live in a country where this sort of shit isn’t taken seriously by a significant portion of the population.

  2. LexAequitas says

    From the article:

    Myers [note: not PZ] said she believes in creationism, rather than evolution because evolution is “based on a theory that can’t even been proven.”

    Head, meet desk.

  3. Brother Ogvorbis (wearing the history hat right now) says

    It is neither a significant part of our history . . .

    I would disagree with your assessment there. The concept of creationism in its modern incarnation and, especially, the way that creationism has been used as a weapon against progressives, liberals, public education and rational politics is an important part of the history of the United States in the late 19c and all of the 20c. From the invention of moder fundamentalist literalist Christianity to the ‘culture wars’ of the 1980s to today, the concept of evolution has been used as a way to divide the American electorate while at the same time pushing poor and middle-class Christians to vote against their economic self interest. The creation/evolution divide is not as important as the abortion divide, but it has been around longer and, I would argue, was the template with which the anti-choice political and social battle lines were drawn.

    Obviously, I do not argue that creationism should be taught in public schools. The only way I can see it being taught legally would be to include it in a history course, not a science course. Somehow, though, I doubt that is what Kohls and her ilk are pushing.

  4. Mike says

    Just when I thought I wasn’t eating enough fibre I read this article….problem solved!
    The other way to keep this fibre problem at bay is to keep a copy of Creation Magazine in the bathroom.

  5. spruceh0rn says

    I’m starting to think the school board members should be financially liable for the court costs in these cases.

  6. Marcus Hill says

    From the same article:

    Eliminating God from our public lives I think is a mistake and is why we have gone in the direction of spending beyond our means

    See? If it weren’t for all the evil atheists keeping God out of government, the fiscal crisis would never have happened.

  7. Phillip IV says

    “Creationism is a significant part of the history of this country,” Kohls said.

    Yeah, so let’s have some supplemental material for history classes on it, dealing honestly with the erstwhile dominance and later scientific deconstruction of the idea. I’m sure that’s what Ms. Kohl must have meant.

  8. says

    the tea party absolutely must be taken seriously, as adversaries. recent events have proven that they’re strong enough to influence public policy, despite being a bunch of loons. people are supporting them and voting for them.

    please call them out, everyone, as pz does here.

  9. MrEvan says

    I also agree with Kohls. Creationism is a significant part of our history. It should be taught in schools. I would love to hear my daughter come home from school and tell me, “Today, we learned that people used to think some really stupid stuff!”

  10. Cliff Melick says

    I agree with Helen Sotiriadis. The recent capitulation re: the debt ceiling by Obama and Company to Tea Party types demonstrates the danger of ignoring the ignorant.

  11. says

    Aww, nuts! This is local. I thought the worst I had around here was the silly Sinking Jesus statue that burned down. (If it happened to anything else, it would be a sign from God; if it happened to their Jesus statue, it was an electrical fault!) Well, then there’s also a church on every corner around here. Sometimes two on the same corner.

    Uhg.

  12. Rev. BigDumbChimp says

    the tea party absolutely must be taken seriously, as adversaries. recent events have proven that they’re strong enough to influence public policy, despite being a bunch of loons. people are supporting them and voting for them.

    please call them out, everyone, as pz does here.

    Well they should be taken seriously as a threat, but not seriously as thinkers.

  13. says

    … Sometimes two on the same corner.

    Figures. Really does look to me like this ‘god’ feller has much the same business model as do Starbucks and Walmart.

  14. says

    Whoa, these guys are way off message. Don’t they know that you’re not supposed to say “creationism” or “God” or “Christian” when discussing these things in public. You’re supposed to pretend this is all about science! They suck at lying for Jesus.

  15. says

    As much as I wish I could, I can’t really avoid paying attention to what the Teabaggers are doing because I’m afraid they can get into positions of power and cause damage with their lack of a coherent platform. Though I suppose that’s not quite the same as taking them seriously.

    Of course, it doesn’t help that all the noise they make does a good job of distracting people from the fact that the US is going down the tubes on the civil rights front (torture, secret prisons, indefinite detentions, abuse of state secrets privilege, etcetera). I’d rather hear a movement get vocal about that stuff than Teabagger insanity.

  16. Randomfactor says

    We should take the Tea Party seriously because some of them are even dumber than THAT, and they still vote.

  17. Stephan says

    The one thing I like about Teabaggers is that they are true believers, and so they are terribly bad at hiding their idiocy. Compare to traditional conservatives that will happily hide their creationism in “teaching the controversy” and they talk about saving the economy, not liking the option of defaulting the nation.

    They keep their BS out in front, where you can see it.

  18. 'Tis Himself, OM says

    Eliminating God from our public lives I think is a mistake and is why we have gone in the direction of spending beyond our means

    That explains why Kohls is filing for bankruptcy.

  19. says

    The other way to keep this fibre problem at bay is to keep a copy of Creation Magazine in the bathroom.

    Why would you wipe with Creation Magazine? It’s one of the world’s premier comedy publications, along with The Onion and the Landover Baptist webpage.

  20. says

    Oops, I think I might have misunderstood Mike’s comment.

    Where are you, “delete comment” button?

  21. Eric Atkinson says

    So many of you love the term “teabagger.” Would not that make you all “teabagees?”

    Not a teabagger myself.

  22. Baktru says

    “Creationism is a significant part of the history of this country,” Kohls said.

    So teach it in History classes. Today, class, we are going to learn about some totally useless shit people used to believe, which even influenced the government’s public policy in the 21st century!

  23. Harbo says

    I hope the “tea party” fiscal fools fade soon.
    It would be a sad irony, for the great American Experiment to start, and fall, in the name of two completely different tea parties.

  24. Audley Z. Darkheart OM, purveyor of candy and lies says

    Eric,
    Uh, I assumed the teabaggers were also the teabagees, since I want nothing to do with their shit.

  25. lordshipmayhem says

    I’m really encouraged by the Tea Party.

    They will screw up the United States’ educational system so badly that Canada will be much more competitive with our Southern neighbours. Happiness!!

    Americans, welcome your new Canadian overlords!! Mwahahahahaha!!!

  26. says

    There are brain-dead politicians and voters everywhere, it just seems that certain parts of the U.S.A. have a much higher concentration than normal.

  27. mrevan says

    I, for one, welcome our Canadian overlords.

    …Does this mean I can haz healthcare like a grownup country?

  28. Me says

    BTW, The reason Eric Atkinson had not been able to respond is that
    the admin fucker has my log in going to trash.

    Whatever.

  29. says

    I, for one, welcome our Canadian overlords.

    ditto. Especially since, apparently, the state I live in has turned out to never have been a US state, actually. So, maybe, we could become a Canadian province, instead?.

    Canada, interested in a bunch of flooded cornfields with nukes buried under them?