So there are people who go to orgies, or do poly, or just know a lot about organs and what you can do to em. Safe sex fans. Good people, but they are nerds. They are not cool.
The cool sex people are the ones blowing crack pipes at uncle mike’s highway ribs and catching ultra aids from seventeen freaks through orifices they invented for the occasion. I don’t make the rules; it’s cooler to not care about anything. Responsible sex people are inherently less cool than diseased addicts.
Which is fine. It’s good to be a sex nerd. Just wanna clarify who I’m talking to before I ask my question.
Any sex nerds in my readership? I’m trying to figure out these jokers. Let’s call them sex jokers. Specifically Dan the Automator Nakamura and his friends, who were responsible for the bands Handsome Boy Modeling School, Lovage, and Got a Girl. (among others; u kno how hip hop people do)
This isn’t a huge genre of art, but it exists, and Automator isn’t the only exponent of it. Arguably Edward Gorey’s The Curious Sofa was an example. Basically they make sexy art that treats sex as a ridiculous joke.
But it is still sexy. So are these artists actually expressing horniness or are they just doing a comic bit? Or is it both? I know Gorey was asexual, I know little about Mr. Nakamura and friends.
How do you laugh at sex while also getting off on it? Are these sex jokers all on a grade to being litcheral clown sex aficionados? I feel like I’m missing something.
Maybe I should try to have more sex to figure it out. Anyway, here’s Lovage sounding like a parody of Portishead for the sex joker set.
As I reflect, there’s probably an explanation in the years of music criticism regarding The Cramps, Mojo Nixon, Reverend Horton Heat… Still, who wants to dig? Enlighten me, nerds.
–
EDIT to add: Electric Six, how could I forget? And that song S-E-X-X-Y by TMBG. And some unforgivable shit by Jonathan Coulton and others.

FreethoughtBlogs’s own
**SPOILERS BELOW**


Second, it’s a Chinese perspective on individualism vs. collectivism, personal principles vs. social harmony. I am missing a lot of context, possibly all of the context, but if I can ever tumble to it, maybe the movie will help me understand how at least some Chinese people really feel about all that Confucius shit. Here’s what I do get…
As much as I’d love to be a radical, almost everything in life seems to have a moderate answer, a question, a caveat, some reason you can’t reasonably be absolute about it. The well-being of society is crucial to our collective survival. The well-being of an individual is paramount because we are all alone within ourselves, never having been given a choice about whether or not to exist, and we should be able to live our lives in our own way, as long as it causes no harm to others.
Living in this way he makes a lot of enemies. Those enemies are leaders of men – clans, businesses, religious groups, etc. – and while plotting to get back at him, they make the reasonable argument this is for social order, for harmony in society. Whether they seem righteous or not, you can’t just have roughnecks busting up the joint. With kung fu.