They never follow through on the implications
That god character’s actions are always contemptible.
(NSFW, because God is a potty-mouth.)
Don’t forget to check the latest Jesus and Mo, too. He’s not a nice guy in the slightest.
Evolution, development, and random biological ejaculations from a godless liberal
SallyStrange: Elite Femi-Fascist Genius:
January 30th, 2013 at 6:04 pm
Well, this guy certainly took the raping bit to heart:
If they can make you believe absurdities, they can commit atrocities on you.
LykeX:
January 30th, 2013 at 7:30 pm
Mass murder, rape, slavery… yeah, sounds about right.
@Sally
Wow. That story is so bizarre, it sounds like something from the Onion.
theophontes (坏蛋):
January 30th, 2013 at 9:09 pm
@ OP
I see you are using a work of fiction to adduce an aspect of YHWH.
Oh wait … that is how it is always done.
Dick the Damned:
January 30th, 2013 at 9:10 pm
Q. What do ethical people consider to be the principal purposes of punishment?
A. 1. Deterrence of the offender & others.
2. Reformation or rehabilitation of the offender.
3. Incapacitation of the offender where appropriate.
4. To indicate societal disapproval of the offender’s actions.
Q. What do unethical people consider to be the principal purposes of punishment?
A. 1. Revenge, as in “an eye for an eye”.
2. Taking pleasure from seeing the offender suffer.
Q. How does this fit with the Christer’s concept of eternal punishment in Hell?
A. 1. Deterrence isn’t applicable because the offender is never released.
2. Reformation or rehabilitation isn’t applicable because the offender is never released.
3. Incapacitation isn’t applicable because the offender is dead.
4. Indication of societal disapproval isn’t applicable because the offender’s punishment isn’t witnessed.
This leaves revenge & taking pleasure from seeing the offender suffer. Which ain’t exactly what one would expect from an omniscient, omnipotent, benevolent, & just supreme being. But just about what one would expect from a megalomaniacal, Bronze Age, war lord.
Owlglass:
January 30th, 2013 at 9:15 pm
Your in-house companion NonStampCollector also has a new sketch up, with a somewhat similar approach. He’s asking to like his new video on YouTube. Anyway, thought this might fit with the suggestions.
Alverant:
January 30th, 2013 at 9:33 pm
Hold on there! It was totally believable until he mentioned the printers. There were no printers in biblical times! This video was faked! It was probably two guys with a green screen and their friend off screen.
DLC:
January 31st, 2013 at 5:20 am
but you see, all those children and babies who were put to the sword were especially blessed, because Gawd needed them to die.
But, they’re all roasting in hell because they weren’t *saved* first.
Matt G:
January 31st, 2013 at 5:24 am
The Bible really isn’t suitable for children, is it?
mikmik:
January 31st, 2013 at 7:32 am
Awe(swoon), God works in such deleterious ways.
@3 Draw, straw, guffaw. Works every time! Oh well, fight fantasy with fantasy
mikmik:
January 31st, 2013 at 7:36 am
Unless they are delusional psychotics. Hmmm. Sort of a chicken and egg thing going on here.
Gregory in Seattle:
January 31st, 2013 at 8:48 am
Slightly off topic, but have you ever seen Rowan Atkinson as The Devil?
theignored:
January 31st, 2013 at 7:43 pm
Well, here’s another example of how the character of religion can poison things. From the “Wretched radio” youtube site, a young woman is saying that she’s glad that god did not cure her cancer.
Of course, comments are disabled.
I don’t know what to say to that.
Sengkelat:
February 1st, 2013 at 5:32 pm
Why is he wielding a Fijian war club, and what does this imply about where the chosen people are from?