Arizona’s governor vetoed the “we can treat people badly because Jesus” bill yesterday.
The bill was inspired by episodes in other states in which florists, photographers and bakers were sued for refusing to cater to same-sex couples. But it would have allowed much broader religious exemptions by business owners.
Why why why why why can’t florists, photographers and bakers refuse to cater to people they consider oooky? Why? This is America, god damn it, and America was built on the principle that Nice people get to shit on people they consider oooky.
Supporters said the bill was needed to allow people to live and work by their religious beliefs. “This bill is not about allowing discrimination,” State Senator Steve Yarbrough said during debate on the measure last week. “This bill is about preventing discrimination against people who are clearly living out their faith.”
By refusing to cater to people they consider oooky. That’s what faith is for. It tells you who is oooky and who is Nice.
Calls, emails and posts to Ms. Brewer’s Facebook page streamed in by the thousands, many from people urging her to sign the legislation. “Don’t let them bully you, Jan,” one of them read. “If we deny someone their religious beliefs or the right to do business with whom they choose, we truly are giving up more and more, all of us, gay or straight.”
Ah right – the concern is really about gay people not being able to refuse to cater to straight people on the grounds of religious beliefs.
The measure is the latest initiative in Arizona to set off a political firestorm. Arizona is still struggling to repair its image and finances after the boycotts and bad publicity it endured after the passage of an immigration law in 2010 that gave police officers the right to stop people whom they suspected of being in the country illegally and made it a crime for illegal immigrants to hold jobs.
The state also faced a boycott almost 20 years ago, after voters initially refused to recognize Martin Luther King’s Birthday as a state holiday. At that time, the state was also set to host the Super Bowl, but the N.F.L., looking to avoid controversy, moved the game to Pasadena, Calif.
Oh well. They’ll always have cactus.
Are there any republicans left in AZ?
Why why why why why can’t florists, photographers and bakers refuse to cater to people they consider oooky?
You’ve got to have some sympathy though – who could have guessed that chosing a career in floristry, photography or bakery might bring them into contact with homosexuals? The odds must have been millions to one.
“This bill is about preventing discrimination against people who are clearly living out their faith.”
Even if we accepted that ‘faith’ trumps every other consideration – what happens when one faith clashes with another faith?
If Catholics ‘living out their faith’ can refuse to serve homosexuals can they refuse to serve Protestants (or vise versa)?
Can a Jew, Muslim, Sikh or Scientologist refuse to serve Christians?
Shatterface, between this and your “chess is for girls” comment on the “Braid the Queen’s Hair” post, you are winning all the internets today.
There’s always another alternative: wear your bigotry proudly.
Do you not want to cater to homosexual weddings? Add bible verses condemning homosexuality in your window. Make your bigotry known! Even if you can’t refuse service, It’s a near-certain way to ensure the majority of gay couples will not darken your door. They’ll be happy to take their business to someone with the little rainbow flag in their window.
Of course, the downside is that you have to live with the consequences of your free speech, and apparently making Christians feel bad about themselves is the worst form of oppression.
Well, to an American Christian, it’ll be the worst they’re ever likely to experience.
So we must allow discrimination in order to prevent discrimination because discrimination is a bad thing which mustn’t be allowed.
(I think one of us is confused.)