Mexican Archbishop Fabio Martinez Castilla says, “abortion is much more serious than rape of children by priests.”
Enough is enough. Time to stop appointing pope, bishop, cardinal, priest etc. They are just stupid people sitting in a big chair preaching hatred, misogyny, lies and illusions.
Merin says
I would say it’s your biased view towards the cassock.
StevoR : Free West Papua, free Tibet, let the Chagossians return! says
Er, Merin, are you fucking kidding or trolling here?
You have gotta be joking there right?
fork says
Cassock. Haha, what a great word. Cock and ass all rolled into one.
What. You think your comment deserves a reasoned or respectful response?
antony goddard says
Abortion is often a consequence of failed contraception, but these anti-abortion ppl usually oppose any form of contraception, and when the church had power they targeted for extermination any women (or men) with
knowledge of herbs/drugs which could work either as contraception or aborteficients.
naturalcynic says
His Excellency seems to have a acquired a touch of right-wing gringo hyperbole.
grumpyoldfart says
The mugs in the pews could easily bring the church into line by refusing to pay their tithes until some changes are made.
Unfortunately, the mugs in the pews would never have the courage to do that – and they probably agree with the archbishop anyway. They’d much rather attack a young woman with no power, than a priest who could block their path to heaven.
Pierce R. Butler says
Please, Mexican Catholics: Lash back! Tear into this self-serving ignorant child-hating waferbrain until he weeps and grovels for forgiveness!
Jockaira says
By the dogma of the Church, abortion is an act of murder, an especially heinous act resulting in the death of an unsaved soul. Of course, if that soul were allowed to live and develop, its physical body would then be subject to the depredations of horny priests and never-ending imprecations for thithings.
.
Aside from the issue of the Archbishop’s statement being a non-sequitur, it can easily be seen that this statement and its accompanying dogma is entirely self-serving to the interests of the Catholic Supra-National Corporate State.
.
Additionally, the Archbishop’s statement underlines the Church’s contemptuous disdain for the rights of living people (women) and its illogical elevation of unconscious tissue to supremacy over live and aware beings.
zaman says
seiz the wealth of vatican and other religious domes to explore welfare and humanity in the the world.
Sabiha says
Why even blame God Miss Nasreen people make it happen not god get off your high horse and stick to the matter in hand
StevoR : Free West Papua, free Tibet, let the Chagossians return! says
The matter in hand, Sabiha, is that this sack of shit archbishop has stated that ““abortion is much more serious than rape of children by priests.”
Also Taslima Nasreen is NOT blaming God (Allah / God does NOT exist btw) but is merely pointing out this relevant and disgusting fact.
So; do you seriously think that priests raping children is, in fact, less serious than abortion?
Do you have any serious arguments to support that crappy misogynist bovine excrement – or are you just going to abuse the person who brought that to our attention for bringing it to our attention ignoring the fact that she’s quoting a piece of shit archbishop who actually said that?
Wintermute&1Ice9Molecule says
1) People don’t understand if it has no nervous system, it is an unwanted parasitic cancer in the uterus to be struck with every modern literal and figurative scalpel if the carrier so chooses. It is, after all, her body. Why don’t one you men carry it to term?
2) You did just hear that guy say “abortion is much more serious than rape of children by priests right? Those are your holy men, Catholics. Let that sink in like a six hour marination. I’ll be back soon with a fresh little grill.
Dana Muraski says
My future in regulations!!! They create a adorable couple don’t they?!?!?
Urmila Mathonkar says
Was wondering how can a female fuck a male Archbishop? Does she have a penis?
stryker recall says
Despite the fact that the convenience of email cannot be denied, the act of receiving and reading through a snailmail letter is by far the improved experience. So kudos to you personally!br /I understand that the letters aren’t personalized, but are they physically signed with the sender? That would be these kinds of a great touch and a single for which I’d gladly pay out much more. Most likely the sender could signal a tiny percentage, to ensure that a randomly chosen few every month might have slightly more thrill. That possibility would completely make my coronary heart race a bit faster as I tore open the envelope!