Good and bad news in international politics


First the bad news.

In mid-term elections in Argentina, the party of president Javier Milei, a Trump fanboy, won a decisive victory. Trump had blatantly interfered in that election by promising that country a $40 billion bailout package if Milei’s party won and abandoning it if they lost. Typical thuggish threats from him. Unfortunately there are suggestions that this may well have swayed the outcome so Trump will try and repeat it elsewhere.

Milei’s libertarian party, La Libertad Avanza (Liberty Advances), captured nearly 41% of the vote – considerably higher than expected after a miserable spell of corruption scandals and growing economic crisis – compared with his Peronist rivals’ 32%. Argentina’s bonds, stocks and currency, the peso, surged on Monday as Milei celebrated what he called a vindication of his two-year-old “shock therapy” crusade.

The US president had vowed to jettison his South American ally if, as widely predicted, the radical libertarian fared badly in Sunday’s make-or-break legislative vote. “If he doesn’t win, we’re gone,” Trump declared when Argentina’s shaggy-haired president visited him in Washington earlier this month to plead for economic help.

Milei’s political woes have been building in recent months, with growing public frustration over Argentina’s sluggish economy translating into market jitters and a pasting in Buenos Aires’ provincial election in September. Trump stepped in after that humiliating result, offering a $20bn (£15bn) currency swap deal and a further $20bn in support for an economy he claimed was “dying” – although the US president indicated such “generosity” would evaporate if Milei failed to win big on Sunday.

It is really quite astonishing how Trump can find such sums of money to dispose of seemingly at will.

Meanwhile in the UK, in a by-election held in Wales, the candidate of the Welsh nationalist party Plaid Cymru won with 47% of the vote, following the sudden death of th incumbent Labour MP. That party is described as being center-left in Welsh politics. I will not even begin to claim to know the many factors in Welsh politics that led to this result. But one thing seems clear and that is that this humiliating third place finish for the the Labour party with just 11% of the vote, after having held that seat for over a 100 years, can only be viewed as reflecting the utterly inept leadership of prime minister Keir Starmer. (The Conservatives got 2% and the Greens and Liberal Democrats got 1.5% each which makes me wonder if they just ran token campaigns.)

Asked whether he would resign if he could not turn around Labour’s fortunes by the Senedd [the name of the devolved parliament of Wales-MS] elections in May, Sir Keir said: “In relation to the by-election, look, I’m deeply disappointed in the results. I’m not going to suggest otherwise.

“I spoke to the first minister this morning, and clearly we need to reflect and regroup and double down on delivery in Wales, and we clearly need to do much more.”

A redeeming feature is that the surging Reform party led by the odious Nigel Farage threw everything into this election hoping to win the seat but came in second with 36% of the vote, which is still too large for comfort. If Labour continues to flounder under Starmer, Reform will gain ground.

The main good news is that a leftist candidate won the Irish presidency by a landslide, reversing a recent slide towards right-wing politics in that country.

[Catherine] Connolly needed a lot of things to fall into place, and one by one, they all did. The ferocity with which she stood up for Palestinian dignity drew her heaps of criticism throughout the campaign from the country’s media and political call, but clearly helped her with the public, who also approved of her social democratic politics. Her main opponent has conceded, and Connolly has won in a landslide. The Irish president is a fairly ceremonial position, though it does have some powers.

Independent socialist Catherine Connolly swept to a landslide victory Saturday to become Ireland’s next president, dealing a record-breaking rebuke to the two center-ground parties of government.

Jubilant supporters of the 68-year-old Connolly, a lawmaker from the western city of Galway, embraced and kissed her as final results from Friday’s election were announced at the Dublin Castle count center.

In her victory speech, Connolly struck an immediate note of unity. She stood side by side with Ireland’s government leaders — and pledged to challenge the far right and its anti-immigrant agenda.

Connolly won a record 63.4 percent of valid votes. Heather Humphreys of the government coalition party Fine Gael finished a distant second with 29.5 percent.

Connolly won, in no small part, thanks to backing from Ireland’s five left-wing parties, most crucially Sinn Féin. All stood aside to give her a clean run on an anti-government platform, a political first for the normally fractious left.

While the left celebrated from Dublin Castle to Galway, Ireland’s disgruntled conservatives left their own mark on the election — by vandalizing their ballots in unprecedented numbers.

The above article omitted a central part of Connolly’s message and that was her strong condemnation of Israel’s genocide in Gaza which a Guardian article only mentioned in passing.

Anger over a housing crisis and the cost of living, campaign blunders by Fine Gael and its ruling partner Fianna Fáil, rare unity among leftwing parties and deft use of social media combined to make Connolly a symbol of change.

The prospect of Connolly succeeding President Michael D Higgins and serving a seven-year term at Áras an Uachtaráin, the presidential residence, thrills supporters. She wishes to ringfence Irish neutrality from what she calls western “militarism” and has accused the UK and US of enabling genocide in Gaza.

Ryan Grim of the excellent Drop Site News had been in Ireland during the summer and took part in a Q/A with Connolly that you can watch here. She is clearly passionate about condemning the genocide and is very powerful.

Grim says in his newsletter (that I subscribe to):

As it happens, this summer, I was in Ireland and had the opportunity to interview a lawmaker who had just launched a longshot bid for the presidency, Catherine Connolly. Along with my Drop Site colleague Abubaker Abed — who had only left Gaza for the first time weeks earlier — and The Ditch’s Paulie Doyle, we gathered in a packed and sweltering pub in Dublin (not much air conditioning over there!) for a long conversation mostly focused on Ireland’s conflicted relationship to Israel and Palestine; much of the country’s population is supportive of the Palestinians and their struggle for independence; the government gives lip service to the question, while mostly going along with broader European policy.

Connolly needed a lot of things to fall into place, and one by one, they all did. The ferocity with which she stood up for Palestinian dignity drew her heaps of criticism throughout the campaign from the country’s media and political call, but clearly helped her with the public, who also approved of her social democratic politics.

Watch her responding to questions about Gaza.

The Irish presidency lacks executive power and is formally largely ceremonial but since 1990 presidents such as Mary Robinson, Mary McAleese, and outgoing president Michael D. Higgins have used their platform to highlight important issues.

Comments

  1. K.P. says

    Hi, Argentinian here. Something that the article about our election doesn’t mention is that voter turnout was historically low. Only about 67% of the electorate participated, so aside from the far right apathy was also a big winner (by the way, in Argentina voting is mandatory, although the punishment for not doing so is a ridiculously small fine).

    As you can imagine, I’m apalled by this result, but ironically it will harm Milei’s own voters more than it will ever affect me. What bothers me is what will happen now that we’re beholden so thoroughly to Trump… this has been one hell of a pact with the devil, bad pun intended.

  2. badland says

    I found this comment over at Lawyers Guns Money to be an interesting view from the inside. LGM is a fairly lefty blog with a fairly lefty commentariat and the commenter is Irish. His take is Connolly is an awful person:

    To have actually dealt with her apparently is to loathe her -- she was bluntly described to me by someone pretty far on the left as a left-wing version of Donald Trump, the same adamantly stated opinions with the same level of utter ignorance about the subject she’s opinionating on. She is particularly close to 2 former MEPs who were regarded as Putin’s Stooges in Brussels, Mick Wallace and his girlfriend Clare Daly -- I’m not understating things when I describe them as Putin’s stooges, they were practically supportive of the invasion of Ukraine.

    Connolly has been notoriously equivocal on straightforward questions like the Russian invasion of Ukraine (sort of blaming the Ukrainians for being invaded) the October 7 Hamas attack in Israel, various terrorist groups around the world and tries to conceal her history. For example she was quite enthusiastic about Brexit and supported Nigel Farage… And apparently she was in favour of Ireland leaving the EU but has now buried at that bit of history.

    By the way it is a mistake to describe this as the Ireland moving left… This is more of a protest vote against the government that is not solving problems particularly in the property [housing] space

    Take that as you will.

  3. Holms says

    “I spoke to the first minister this morning, and clearly we need to reflect and regroup and double down on delivery in Wales, and we clearly need to do much more.”

    Doubling down means intensifying one’s existing efforts. Meaning, Starmer is going to pursue his existing strategy, except more so. The strategy that earned his party a drubbing at the polls.

    This fucking idiot will kill UK’s Labour party..

  4. lanir says

    I’m not sure how much of the $40 billion for Argentina will actually appear, if any. Talking about it is getting the GOP hammered and he’ll either need Congress to allocate that money or he’ll need to steal it from somewhere else. It’s definitely not coming from his scumbag billionaire friends, they want return on their investments and that’s not going to happen there for a long time. The only thing I’m not sure about is who would have standing to sue and stop it. And whether whoever is in that position right now is one of Trump’s corrupt lackeys.

    Over the next couple weeks it’s going to get more and more obvious that the GOP is sending a big chunk of our tax dollars elsewhere while starving some Americans so they can kill others by denying healthcare. So I guess we’ll see how effective Fox really is at PR. I’m certain they’ll keep lying about it.

  5. says

    Starmer reminds me of nothing so much as one of the people trapped in a “Network Marketing*” cult; convinced that all the difficulties he is facing are caused by a simple problem with his sales technique and he just needs to work harder on it (and perhaps invest more money in books and video courses), and unable to come to terms with the real explanation that people simply do not want to buy the products he is trying to sell.

    * The sort of networks you might see in Egypt. Or Paris.

  6. beholder says

    @2 badland

    Take that as you will.

    His take is so riddled with BlueAnon nonsense (like calling people “Putin’s Stooges”) that it sounds like he’s having a break with reality. Being critical of Israel’s genocide in Gaza and U.S. efforts to both provoke and prolong its proxy war with Russia in Ukraine is a breath of fresh air after all the waves of propaganda Western audiences have been subjected to.

    Like Mano said, it’s a figurehead position. I don’t expect anything to change. But if it’s got spooks like your source irritated, it sent the right message.

  7. beholder says

    @3 Holms

    This fucking idiot will kill UK’s Labour party..

    He already killed it, because…

    @5 bluerizz

    Starmer is a demolitions expert. He was paid to go in there and purge Labour of all elements that would possibly stand up to Israel in the coming years. He accomplished that years ago — this stint as PM is just unscripted inertia before the wheels fall off the lorry.

    He already accomplished what he wanted. Of course, the flipside is that Israel went mask-off and generated its own worldwide wave of anti-Zionist anger. Not even Starmer can keep a lid on that for much longer.

  8. badland says

    @ beholder,

    Still waiting for your link showing the Democrats support Trump’s upcoming assault on Venezuela.

  9. file thirteen says

    Lanir @4

    Argentina will get nothing from Trump. It is, as usual from Trump, a complete lie, to be followed by the claim that despite all evidence to the contrary, with Milei in charge Argentina are doing fantastically well and are receiving way more than $40b from the US in “benefits”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *