Every state in the US has its own flag. The flag of Mississippi, adopted in 1894, was the only one that incorporated the confederate battle flag within it, in the top left. This has been a source of contention with many attempts to remove it, all meeting with failure. Mississippi is a deeply conservative Republican state. That party currently has supermajorities in both its house of representatives and the senate plus the governor is a Republican, all of whom strongly opposed any attempt to remove the confederate symbol. The people of Mississippi voted in a referendum 2001 to keep the flag as it was and the current governor Tate Reeves said that the only way to change it would be through another referendum. So proud were they of their confederate association that in just April of this year, the governor Tate Reeves proclaimed it as Confederate Heritage Month.
But then, in a dramatic shift in late June, both houses of the legislature voted by the required 2/3 majorities to remove the flag and the governor signed the bill on June 30th. The house voted 91-23 and the senate 37-14. So after being the only state with a flag that incorporated the confederate flag, Mississippi suddenly became the only state with no flag at all.
What caused the abrupt shift so that something that had been unthinkable just a couple of months ago now has become reality? What made the staunchly conservative, heavily Republican-dominated legislature and governor, formerly ardent supporters of retaining the old flag, rush through this legislation just a day before the deadline when they were due to go on recess?
I had written about this a few weeks ago and had assumed that this was due to public pressure following the widespread protests against police brutality that had resulted in the removal of many symbols of racism in the country. So was I right that the protests caused a sudden change in attitudes among Mississippi lawmakers? Not exactly. While it had re-ignited calls to change the flag, those appeals seemed to be getting nowhere. It turns out that while those events were the ultimate cause and did play a major role, they did so indirectly. The proximate cause was, as is so often the case, the two things that drive much of policy: money and sports. The same public pressures that shifted attitudes in the NFL and the Washington football team because sponsors and advertisers threatened to abandon them, also worked to change positions in MIssissippi.
The process was kick-started on June 18th.
The Southeastern Conference, the preeminent and powerhouse collegiate athletics conference in the South, made their message clear [on June 18th]: Mississippi must change their flag or they may not get championship events.
“It is past time for change to be made to the flag of the State of Mississippi,” SEC commissioner Greg Sankey said in a statement posted to Twitter. “Our students deserve an opportunity to learn and compete in environment that are inclusive and welcoming to all.”
Sankey went on to say that if Mississippi refuses to change their flag this time, they will consider banning championship events from the state until it is.
The NCAA, the governing body of college athletics, also piled on the following day.
A day after SEC commissioner Greg Sankey released a statement saying the conference’s championships will not take place in Mississippi until the Confederate emblem is removed from the state flag, the NCAA put forth an even harsher punishment.
In statement Friday morning, the NCAA prohibited postseason events of any kind from taking place in Mississippi until the symbol of the Confederacy is permanently removed from the flag. The announcement came on Juneteenth, a holiday celebrating the emancipation of slaves in the United States.
These threats of losing lucrative sports events lit a fire under the lawmakers and they then rushed through the law to remove the flag that was signed into law by the governor on June 30th. In order to persuade a couple of holdouts to vote in favor of removal, the legislation said that the new flag must include the words “In God We Trust”, which violates the tenets of good flag design that says that there should be no words.
The NPR radio program RadioLab had a gripping story about how the change came about, starting with John Hawkins, a black student at the University of Mississippi (known as Ole Miss) in the early 1980s, who unexpectedly became a cheerleader. There had never been a black cheerleader before at the university. He refused to take part in the tradition of male cheerleaders carrying a massive confederate flag across the stadium at the start of football games. That triggered a huge controversy with KKK marches, massive protests by white students, a large number of whom at one point marched towards his fraternity while chanting and had to be stopped by police, and death threats. As a result of the tumult, the college president declared that the confederate flag would no longer be an official college symbol nor used at college events and it came down. But individual students were still allowed to carry the flag. Since the flag was still there in the state flag, it could still be seen on the flagpole in front of the college administration building. That changed in 2015 with the massacre in a church where nine black people were killed during a prayer meeting. Photos turned up of him wrapping himself with the confederate flag. As a result, Ole Miss decided to remove the state flag, leaving an empty flagpole. Other businesses and institutions started to follow suit.
Also in the story is Laurin Stennis, the granddaughter of John Stennis, a long-time US senator from Mississippi who was a strong believer in segregation and in the inferiority of black people. Laurin abhorred her grandfather’s views and became a writer for a progressive news organization. She set about trying to design a new flag that would not have the racist connotations of the old that could be adopted.
This story of how a deeply entrenched symbol of racism was suddenly abandoned is very nicely told and well worth listening to. Or you can read the transcript.
Marcus Ranum says
I saw a great thing the other day, that The Washington Football Team has decided to be known as The Washington Football Team until they come up with a new name. I think that if they have a referendum on what The Washington Football Team should be called it’s “The Washington Football Team” Or “Footbally McFootballface”
I hate professional sports so much. I wish we could get the football fans and the federal police spun up at eachother.
Pierce R. Butler says
The crazed church shooter, whose name I’d rather we could all forget, spells it ending with a “f”.
Pierce R. Butler says
And Ole Miss still calls its teams the “Rebels” (though maybe for not much longer).
They’re selling shirts already, I saw someone in a “The Washington Football Team” t-shirt at the store yesterday. With just the plain text and no mascot or logo, it almost seemed artistic in a brutalist or minimalist sort of way, which I appreciated. I hope they keep the name.
Matt G says
Like so many organizations who don’t want to change, they do the right thing when no other options remain.
As a lit teacher, all of this gives me a great jumping off point to talk about symbolism in works of literature. Flags, statues — it seems as if half the controversies in the country right now center around symbolism.
To all the “heritage not hate” folks I say — no single group gets to decide what a symbol represents — that is decided collectively. When you write your papers, I won’t grade you off and say “You’re wrong, this thing in the story doesn’t represent X, it represents Y.” Everyone is entitled to their own interpretation, and neither I nor you get to decide someone else’s interpretation is wrong. So to you, the Confederate flag represents stories of your great-grandpappy who left the farm to fight in the war — but if I say the flag represents slavery and treason, you have to acknowledge that interpretation is also legitimate.
The thing is, though, the South is a coherent cultural area, so I’ll grant it could use a symbol to represent that. I’d suggest the magnolia. If you want to fly a gigantic magnolia flag by the side of a highway, will anyone be offended? I doubt it.
At least, it we’re looking for a uniquely southern plant, it’s either that or kudzu, and at least the magnolia is native.
Mano Singham says
Good point. I have re-written it to get rid of his name.
Tabby Lavalamp says
My local CFL team also had a name for an outdated term for Inuit people. They are currently the Edmonton Football Team until they come up with a new name, one that will probably start with an E so they can keep their EE logo.
It was just within the last couple of years that they insisted they were keeping the name after doing what they claimed was plenty of dialogue with Inuit people.
brucegee @6: I have a large, healthy magnolia tree in my front yard… here in Massachusetts.
While I agree that a beautiful, aromatic flower would make a fine symbol, I’m not sure the South overall has earned that distinction, though of course there has been much progress over my lifetime. In my youth, a “Whites Only” sign would have been more appropriate.
This actually was Mississippi’s flag during the Civil War.
Also, a nitpick. One state still does fly the Confederate flag: Georgia’s flag is the Star and Bars (the first Confederate national flag) with the seal of Georgia added in the canton.
Marcus @#1 -- the best suggestion I saw was Washington Thinskins.
johnson catman says
re tbrandt @10:
@ 8 Tabby Lavalamp
It’s been so long since I have heard the word “Eskimos” used for anything other than the football team I had almost forgotten the connection.
Duh. Time for the MoCT.
Compare the current flag of Georgia
to the CSA flag in use from late 1861 to 1863:
Aside from the subtlest variations in color tone, star size, and geometric proportion (and the addition of the Georgia coat of arms), they are the same. It’s hard for me to believe that this was an accident. As the wikipedia article on the Georgia flag charitably puts it,
johnson catman says
re tbrandt @14: Perhaps so. But it is not the recognized Battle Flag of the Confederacy that is used by racists. Unless someone is a student of history (as you presumably are), the distinction is lost.
Most US state flags violate this tenet. We’re lucky when they can keep it down to the state name.
Mano@#7: Eliminating the name makes “him” and “himself” in the next sentence confusing. You could change “him” to “the shooter” to make the sentence sensible without naming him.
Mark Dowd says
Request for education please: why are we giving the Charlston shooter the He-who-must-not-be-named treatment? I had to look it up because I thought it was more recent than that.