To some people, today is Columbus Day. Those people have a cultish dedication to believing that a rapist, a thief, a slaver, and an oppressor was a hero — I guess nowadays we can believe there will be subset of the citizenry who ignore the facts to invent a cherished symbol. To be fair, here’s a bit from the Friends of Italian-Americans.
Even by today’s impossible utopian standards, Columbus was without a doubt the greatest hero of the Fifteenth and Sixteenth Centuries. He was a capitalist in the age of Empires, and what he did began the downfall of imperialism. He was a scientist in the age of superstition. He was a civil rights activist in the age of oppression. And he was a pacifist in the age of war-mongering. Thus, Columbus was an icon and a paragon.
For a quick dismissal of their claims, consider that they condemn Howard Zinn’s A People’s History of the United States by citing a PragerU video.
I think this is a better summary of Columbus’s character.
cartomancer says
I’d quite like to meet this Columbus that the Friends of Italian-Americans are describing. He sounds lovely. I expect he’d hate the real one, though.
Walter Solomon says
Even if true, which it isn’t, that couldn’t have been his intention. He was happily claiming new lands for the Spanish Enpire after all.
rietpluim says
I have the strong impression that most people who are considered heroes, actually were rapists, thieves, slavers, oppressors etc. Consider Julius Caesar, for example. How would we call him if he invaded France today?
robro says
I would nominate Galileo or da Vinci as better models of Italian identity than Columbus or any of the Caesars.
timgueguen says
Interestingly a report came out this week that DNA from his supposed remains indicate he was Jewish. The report is already being criticised for the methods used and the conclusions made.
mordred says
Walter Solomon@2: Yeah no idea how C. could be seen as the beginning of the downfallmof imperialism.
I mean, his discovery and claiming the new lands for Spain, pretty much started the European empires, didn’t it?
Reginald Selkirk says
@5: And the fact that they announced the results in a televised press conference rather than a peer-reviewed journal article.
chigau (違う) says
Today is Thanksgiving Day in Canada.
I shall “celebrate” with a TV dinner and a bottle of plonk.
Larry says
Since Columbus never set foot in what was to become the US nor on any part of the North American continent, have a holiday to celebrate the man is ridiculous. Factor in his rather unsavory penchant for slavery, torture, and other assorted behaviors often associated with European conquering “heroes”, we may as well have a holiday for King Leopold of Belgium who had many of the same qualities.
raven says
I know what you mean.
My ancestors were the Vikings.
AFAICT, they were just thugs, looters, raiders, slavers, and conquerors who terrorized the countries around them for a few hundred years.
The first raid on Britain was a monastery full of unarmed monks.
How hard was it to loot and destroy that monastery?
They managed to conquer and occupy parts of Ireland and France (Normandy). Well good for them but the native populations probably had a different idea about watching their land and stuff being stolen.
They only look good to us now because they’ve been dead for 1,000 years and are distant from us in time and space. And some of us had ancestors who were on the winning side
whheydt says
Also keep in mind that three days before “Columbus Day”, it’s Leif Eriksson Day.
Side note… Columbus only survived his initial voyage because he was using the wrong size for the Earth.
Akira MacKenzie says
Let me guess, their entire argument is “Zinn in a COMMUNIST (dramatic sting) so therefore he’s wrong.” Didn’t there “kids” channel produce a cartoon that argued that Columbus enslaving the natives, which was totally cool back then, was a more moral option than killing them?
Rhetorical question! Of course they did! (https://youtu.be/PKJU0K_ebfU?si=FI0gVs39MmhkyYVd)
Of course, what can you say about a YouTube channel whose quisling founder laments that he can’t use the n-word in public anymore.
Ridana says
Both of those statements read like parody to me (I assume the second one actually is).
Well, imperialism has to rise before it can fall, right?
Akira MacKenzie says
Fun Fact: Columbus’ motives for establishing an Atlantic trade route to Asia wasn’t just simple greed. Columbus wanted to fund a final Crusade to kick the Ottoman Empire of the Holy Land before the imminent return of Christ.
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/apocalypse/explanation/columbus.html
Nathaniel says
Columbus Day is a concession to Italian-Americans, and why not? But Columbus is not the best exemplar. He wasn’t American; he didn’t even set foot on the American continent. How about Frank Sinatra? Or Enrico Fermi? Or Yogi Berra?
Kathi Rick says
unkhead Factoid:
Did Columbus spot a UFO?
Around 10 p.m. on the night of October 11, 1492 Columbus spotted an eery light glowing above the water. The following account is taken from “The Life and Voyages of Christopher Columbus”:
Christopher Columbus and Pedro Gutierrez while on the deck of the Santa Maira, observed, “a light glimmering at a great distance.” It vanished and reappeared several times during the night, moving up and down, “in sudden and passing gleams.” It was sighted 4 hours before land was sighted, and taken by Columbus as a sign they would soon come to land.
The Vicar (via Freethoughtblogs) says
As I recall, even the Spanish and Italians themselves both hated Columbus in his day. His crew certainly hated him. Sadly, they didn’t let their hatred of him influence them towards, you know, not behaving like him in all important respects. Not that that is unusual in history in any way, but it’s still depressing.
drew says
I’m pretty sure that “cultish” has a connotation of minority populations.
I agree that he was a monster. But I think that makes us the cultish ones.
astringer says
“Columbus didn’t find America”: Show of Hands
shermanj says
prager is an opponent of honesty and truth. He is trying indoctrinate people by forcing xtian terrorist fictional ideas down everyone’s throat. His pompous attitude and his phony ‘prager u’ are laughable.
It would be more appropriate if phrase was a threat made by a thug ‘Yeah, we’re gonna prater u’.
In contrast, the most outstanding and honest perspectives on history are found at:
https://www.howardzinn.org/
https://skepticalvet.com/ Danny Sjursen
Want an angry laugh, tell our tribal members how the murderous columbus ‘discovered’ america.
shermanj says
Oh, typos, sleepless in scarizona, I’m sorry. Should be:
It would be more appropriate if the phrase was a threat made by a thug ‘Yeah, we’re gonna prager u’.
expatlurker says
@ 15 Leonard da Vinci gets my vote.
Walter Solomon says
Raven @10
And they didn’t get any better after adopting Christianity. They just continued the conquest in the name of Christ. Tancred, for example, was the leader of the First Crusade and the first “Prince of Galilee” and he was an Italo-Norman.
outis says
“He was a capitalist in the age of Empires,
and what he did began the downfall of imperialism.
He was a scientist in the age of superstition.
He was a civil rights activist in the age of oppression.
And he was a pacifist in the age of war-mongering.
Thus, Columbus was an icon and a paragon.”
All right, now I know that some people live in different dimensions. So about this:
– not a capitalist, he was always lapping at the feet of his queen to get cash & honours, but certainly a thief and a robber.
– not an anti-imperialist, he kick-started the biggest empire ever and a monstrous, continent-wide pillage campaign.
– not a scientist, he underestimated Earth’s circumference by about 50%, in fact he thought he was in India. The people he met he called Indians, right? And so we got “American Indians”, such nonsense:
– not a civil rights activist, he was a slaver and he is on record mentioning what good slave material the islanders he contacted were.
– and lastly, pacifist and slaver do not go together. So, an icon and a paragon? Rather, a paragon of ickiness.
I’d be glad to ascertain he was no Italian. But I very much doubt the coffin that was examined was his, after half a millennium you never know who’s buried in a particular location and his cadaver did a bit of back-and forth between continents.
Really, fuck that guy.
robro says
At the beginning Columbus wasn’t working for the “Spanish Empire” because said empire didn’t exist until 1492, or later. He was working for the Spanish crown.
As for enslaving indigenous people, it’s no excuse but he was doing exactly the same thing that almost everyone did, such as raven’s Vikings who enslaved people they didn’t just kill. It would be hundred years before slavery was considered normal and largely erased…and even now there are vestiges of it. California is considering a proposition to end forced labor in prison, ie slavery by another name. I assume Mississippi embraces prison slavery with all its perks for local growers.
crimsonsage says
@3 going by the rightwing drift of modern France, probably a hero.
John Morales says
Robro:
Close, but not quite.
Wikipedia: “On 1 May 1486, permission having been granted, Columbus presented his plans to Queen Isabella, who, in turn, referred it to a committee.”
He approached the Spanish monarchs with a proposal, and was given support and patronage.
Not the same as working for them, as if they had sought him out and employed him.
Not entirely coincidentally, also Wikipedia: “Beginning with the 1492 arrival of Christopher Columbus and continuing for over three centuries, the Spanish Empire would expand […]”
—
BTW, as I was growing up in Spain, he was lauded as an honorary Spaniard, with the grudging admission he was born in Italy. A minor detail, that.
brightmoon says
Columbus? He didn’t discover the Americas. 🤷🏾♀️ I celebrate Indigenous Day as some of my ancestors are Cherokee.
microraptor says
Raven @10:
In fact, the word “slave” comes from “Slav” because the Slavs were the favorite target of the Norse when it came to slave hunting.
On the other hand, it’s hard to find anyone in Europe at the time who was any better.
Akira MacKenzie says
I’m sorry, but is being a capitalist supposed to be a “good” thing?
PZ Myers says
Hey, you can diss the Vikings all you want, but my ancestors were good ol’ stay-at-home peasants.
Erp says
“He was a scientist in the age of superstition” I wonder if the Friends of Italian-Americans have fallen for the flat earth historical myth. Not the myth that the earth is flat but the myth that most 15th century educated Europeans thought the earth was flat. Classically educated Europeans of that time knew the earth was spherical; it permeated their culture (think Dante’s Inferno which had a spherical earth). This concept had probably trickled down to most people. The best educated knew that Columbus was badly wrong about the size and that he had also likely overestimated how far east Asia went.
Classically trained Romans had known the shape of the earth since before the Roman Empire had been established. Augustine of Hippo (prominent Christian 5th century) knew the earth was spherical. He did castigate some other Christians who claimed it was flat. Admittedly they also all thought that the earth was at the center and planets (including moon and sun) and stars circled around it (Copernicus was young and didn’t publish until his death in 1543 and even then was welded to the idea of circular not elliptical orbits).
I would agree with Da Vinci (1452-1519) as probably the Italian most deserving of fame from that era.
John Morales says
Erp:
Presumably you would were it not the case that the celebration is about his arrival in the New World, not about his nationality.
It’s not about the fame, but about he “discovery” and subsequent conquest and pillaging and colonisation.
It marks the day.
(A bit like Australia Day for us, I suppose)
—
Also, were not the Vikings those Norsemen who went a-Viking?
(Or, the people who could be called up to arms by their lord)
woozy says
I had never heard about this aspect of the history of Columbus day, and I don’t know how accurate I should assume it to be but… It was interesting.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/10/13/columbus-day-holiday-accident-history/
microraptor says
John Morales @33: Yeah, “viking” was an activity, not an occupation. Specifically, it was the action of rowing one of their longboats.
F.O. says
As an Italian-Italian(-Australian-Swedish) I support this message!
And LOL, the IATUOA statement is GLORIOUS!
Love me some anarchists.
@PZ: where did you find it? I couldn’t find any source. =(
LykeX says
Walter Solomon #23
Very true. There’s an often-told story about the origin of the Danish flag, namely that it fell from heaven. It sounds so romantic and mythical, doesn’t it?
Then you hear that it occurred during a battle in modern Estonia. What was the Danish king doing all the way out in Estonia? He was killing heathens and expanding his empire, all under the banner of the Northern Crusades; a much more profitable venture than going to the Holy Land.
Religion sure is a handy way of rubber stamping what you already wanted to do, isn’t it?
KG says
Robro@25,
Spanish conquest of the Canary Islands began in 1402. This was the first overseas possession of Spain, so it seems reasonable to count that date as the beginning of the Spanish Empire.
Tethys says
Viking is a verb which means to travel by water, just as hiking is a verb that means to travel by foot. The Old Norse verb for rowing is (s)vef, which is cognate with English sweep and the root of Sweden. The initial s drops out of Old Norse by the 1100’s.
Columbus of course did not discover America, nor is that his actual name. Cristobo Colón was a brutal colonial governor who was eventually removed from his post, deported from ‘Hispaniola’ and arrested/prosecuted by the Crown of Castile for his crimes.
John Morales says
Cristobo Colón → Cristobal Colón in Spanish.
(Original name was Cristoforo Colombo)
John Morales says
[also, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amerigo_Vespucci was not inconsequential in a nominative sense]
Tethys says
Yup, Amerigo being the nominative of the land of cherries and all that.
Cristobal is just a Latin spelling of the name.
There is probably a Grimm law of sound changes that details the whole f-v-b-p thing.
Christopher was anything but peaceful, Colón suits him better than Colombo.
seachange says
I walked to the post office yesterday, it was closed. My first thought was not ‘it’s a federal holiday on a Monday I wonder which one it is’. It was ‘of course DeJoy is still postmaster general so it is closed without any mention of why on the door jeez’. And since it was at a bus stop I whipped out my pass and got halfway to the larger post office nearby before it occurred to me that it was Columbus Day.
I hadn’t thought it was an important day to start with. And it took me nearly an hour to figure it out.
StevoR says
@32.Erp : “I would agree with Da Vinci (1452-1519) as probably the Italian most deserving of fame from that era.”
Personally my vote would be for Galileo but Da Vince is certainly a good choice. As an armchair astronomer , I kinda have a bias to Galiilo’s contribution to astronomy in popularising and refining the design of the telescope, defiantly advocating for heliocentrism, discovering jupietr’s moons, sunspots, etc..
Although if we’re just celebrating Italian-Americans why pick someone from that era and not a more modern one and an actual Italian-American? My suggestion here, FWIW, would be Mario Andretti ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mario_Andretti ) who is a remarkable figure, the USA’s last F1 champion still (1978), apparently very charismatic and popular and he’s even still alive to enjoy the honour. Of course, I’m biased and it is perhaps too niche? Still I’m sure there are many other better choices than an ancient colonial slaver and mistaken deluded explorer whose history is dripping with human misery and who pre-dated Italy anyhow.
John Morales says
“Although if we’re just celebrating Italian-Americans […]”
(Sigh)
“Of course, I’m biased and it is perhaps too niche?”
Merely too irrelevant.
—
Again: Presumably you would were it not the case that the celebration is about his arrival in the New World, not about his nationality.
It’s not about the fame, but about he “discovery” and subsequent conquest and pillaging and colonisation.
It marks the day.
(A bit like Australia Day for us, I suppose)
—
Would you similarly suggest Australia Day is about famous Englishmen?
(Same thing exactly. Nothing to do with Columbus being Italian!)
John Morales says
[BTW, StevoR, is it not obvious to you that is a parody account going on about Italianness?]
StevoR says
@ ^ John Morales : Not really because I did think it was meant more as a tribute to Italian-Americans and a day for them than for Columbus specifically and that was why it was a thing.
Which of course, is controversial and something many people want tochange here too – me included. For starters its only the founding of the penal colony of NSW NOT our country itself.
No, Also which famous englishman indeed? Too many get mixed up over whether its about Cook & his initial claiming of our continent ignoring its prior Indigenous inhabitatnts – & the Dutch claim to New Holland albeit other side and not then known for sure to be connected.. Plus Arthur Phillip and First Fleet or even as Scummo once farted something to do with the later european marine circumnavigatrion which was by Matthew Flinders and his rotten – literally – ship the Investigator.
..
John Morales says
StevoR, it’s satire. Parody. A joke. Trolling.
The very name (Italian-American Trade Unionists of America) should be a clue.
So, Wikipedia:
— Columbus Day is a national holiday in many countries of the Americas and elsewhere, and a federal holiday in the United States, which officially celebrates the anniversary of Christopher Columbus’s arrival in the Americas.
–Australia Day is the official national day of Australia. Observed annually on 26 January, it marks the 1788 landing of the First Fleet and raising of the Union Flag of Great Britain by Arthur Phillip at Sydney Cove, a small bay on the southern shore of Sydney Harbour.
—
Hey, let me stroke your Americanophilia:
“On 13 May 1787 a fleet of 11 ships, which came to be known as the First Fleet, was sent by the British Admiralty from England to New Holland.[a] Under the command of Naval Captain Arthur Phillip, the fleet sought to establish a penal colony at Botany Bay on the coast of New South Wales, which had been explored and claimed by Lieutenant James Cook in 1770. The settlement was seen as necessary because of the loss of the Thirteen Colonies in North America.[19]”
Pierce R. Butler says
Hurray, I learned a new (not Italian-sounding at all) word today: strunz!