Comments

  1. microraptor says

    Seattle judge blocks Trump immigration order

    SEATTLE/BOSTON – A federal judge in Seattle on Friday granted a nationwide temporary restraining order blocking U.S. President Donald Trump’s recent action barring nationals from seven countries from entering the United States.

    The judge’s order represents a major challenge to the Trump administration, which is expected to immediately appeal. The judge declined to stay the order, suggesting that travel restrictions could be lifted immediately.

  2. says

    Constitutional crisis on the way? Will the CBP, viewing itself as an arm of the executive branch, submit to the orders of the judiciary? Will the enforcement tools of the judiciary serve those orders, or see that they’re carried out? I’m about fifty fifty on the chances, myself – I could see the CBP refusing the judges’ orders, and I could see them finally caving too. Don’t know which way it will go.

    Thanks Lynna and other contributors for the great work you do on what is basically my main political starting point for daily surfing.

  3. says

    I see so many people talking impeachment and removal from office, as if that’s really a plausible scenario. It’s delusional.

    There will be no impeachment. The GOP house and Senate have a guy in place who will appoint crazies to the SC, and rubber stamp any cockamamie or murderous legislation they can dream up. It’s a dream scenario for them, why would they ever change it?

  4. says

    CaitieCat @2

    Thanks Lynna and other contributors for the great work you do on what is basically my main political starting point for daily surfing.

    I feel like we are doing our part of fight back. We don’t the lies slip past us unchallenged. We don’t let the injustices continue without protest. We may be a small cog in the resistance, but we’re there.

    mircroraptor @1, the Trump administration announced that it will appeal the ruling by the federal judge in Seattle. In the meantime, 60,000 to 100,000 people have had their visas revoked (the number varies depending on the source providing the estimate). The problem is huge.

  5. says

    Reposting from the previous chapter of this thread.

    A government lawyer revealed that 100,000 visa were revoked because of Trump’s Muslim ban. That is considerably more that the 109 people that Sean Spicer claimed were “inconvenienced.”

    Over 100,000 visas have been revoked as a result of President Trump’s ban on travel from seven predominantly Muslim countries, an attorney for the government revealed in Alexandria federal court Friday.

    The number came out during a hearing in a lawsuit filed by attorneys for two Yemeni brothers who arrived at Dulles International Airport last Saturday. They were coerced into giving up their legal resident visas, they argue, and quickly put on a return flight to Ethiopia.

    “The number 100,000 sucked the air out of my lungs,” said Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg of the Legal Aid Justice Center, who represents the brothers.

    The government attorney, Erez Reuveni from the Justice Department’s Office of Immigration Litigation, could not say how many people with visas were sent back to their home countries from Dulles in response to the travel ban. However, he did say that all people with green cards who came through the airport have been let into the United States.

    For people like the brothers, Tareq and Ammar Aqel Mohammed Aziz, who tried to enter the country over the weekend with valid visas and were sent back, the government appears to be attempting a case-by-case reprieve. They and other plaintiffs in lawsuits around the country are being offered new visas and the opportunity to come to the U.S. in exchange for dropping their suits. […]
    Washington Post link to article written by Rachel Weiner and Justin Jouvenal.

    Read more: http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2016/11/05/discuss-moments-of-political-madness-6/#ixzz4XgOvXWxa

  6. says

    NBC News also covered the large number of revoked visas.

    In other news, Rachel Maddow interviewed Colin Kahl this evening. I’ll post a link for that as soon as I have one. Kahl is the guy who was in the room on January 6th when a general proposal for expanded activity in Yemen was discussed during the Obama administration. Kahl is the guy who called out the falsehoods the Trump administration is pushing about the botched raid in Yemen.

    From the previous chapter of this thread: Sean Spicer claimed that the Yemen raid was planned and approved under Obama’s watch. It was not.

    President Donald Trump’s first major military operation, a Navy SEAL raid in Yemen that left multiple civilians dead as well as American Chief Petty Officer William “Ryan” Owens, may not have been as extensively planned under Obama’s administration as Team Trump initially suggested.

    Colin Kahl, who served as a national security official under President Barack Obama, fired off a series of tweets on Thursday arguing that while the Defense Department had discussed Yemeni raids with Obama in a general fashion, the specific raid attempted by the Trump administration was not brought up.

    Some Yemen facts: 1/DoD worked up GENERAL proposal for OVERALL set of expanded authorities for these types of raids at end of Obama admin

    2/The broad package was discussed in the interagency in the closing weeks of the Obama term. This particular raid was NOT discussed.

    3/Moreover no recommendation was made other than a recommendation to provide the next Administration with the necessary information.

    4/Idea was for next team to run a deliberative process to assess risks.

    5/And, critically, Obama made no decisions on this before leaving office, believing it represented escalation of U.S. involvement in Yemen

    6/And therefore should not be something he decided a few days before leaving office. Obama thought the next team should take a careful look.

    7/ And run a careful process. From what I’ve read and heard, however, team Trump didn’t do a careful vetting of the overall proposal or raid

    8/Instead, Trump apparently had dinner with Mattis/Dunford and greenlit the op. I’ve heard there was a Deputies meeting the next day, but…

    Salon link

    The following in from the New York Times:

    […] Members of Mr. Obama’s national security team pushed back Thursday at Mr. Spicer’s description of how the former president had set the stage for the decision. They said the attack had not been approved by Mr. Obama, and that materials left for the Trump team emphasized considerable risks.

    “Not what happened,” Colin Kahl, the national security adviser to former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., wrote on Twitter after Mr. Spicer’s briefing.

    Mr. Kahl’s colleagues said that Lisa Monaco, Mr. Obama’s homeland security adviser, told the national security staff in early January that Mr. Obama was not prepared to approve the concept for the raid. Instead, they prepared a memorandum for Mr. Trump’s team that described a variety of options, and underscored the risks.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/02/world/middleeast/yemen-raid-trump.html

  7. says

    Here is White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer’s response to the federal judge’s ruling in Seattle (see comment 1).

    At the earliest possible time, the Department of Justice intends to file an emergency stay of this outrageous order and defend the executive order of the President, which we believe is lawful and appropriate. The president’s order is intended to protect the homeland and he has the constitutional authority and responsibility to protect the American people.

    As the law states, “Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.”

    Shortly after he distributed this statement via email, Spicer emailed a corrected version. The correction? He deleted “outrageous” from the first sentence.

    Spicer’s argument seems to be that the President can do anything he wants to do.

  8. says

    Followup to comment 1.

    The judge that halted the travel ban nationwide is a Bush appointee, and a Republican. Judge James Robart was appointed by George Bush in 2003.

    In other news, a group of people in New York City held a fake vigil for victims of the Bowling Green massacre, the massacre that never happened.

    […] the event referred to by President Trump adviser Kellyanne Conway never happened.

    People with signs that read “We are all Bowling Green,” and “never forget” gathered Friday evening for the vigil. Some also lit candles and left flowers for the imaginary victims.

    […] people chanted “what do we want: alternative facts. when do we want them: now.” […]

    The fake event comes after a discussion in which Conway defended Trump’s ban on visitors from seven Muslim-majority countries, comparing it to what she described as an Obama administration ban on Iraqi refugees for six months following the “Bowling Green massacre.”

    Conway said: “I bet it’s brand-new information to people that President Obama had a six-month ban on the Iraqi refugee program after two Iraqis came here to this country, were radicalized and they were the masterminds behind the Bowling Green massacre. Most people don’t know that because it didn’t get covered.” […]

    Link

    Many people on social media pointed out that Kellyanne Conway routinely massacres the truth.

  9. says

    From the previous chapter of this thread, more background on Kellyanne Conway’s lie about the Bowling Green supposed massacre:

    Steve Benen commented on Kellyanne Conway’s lie (emphasis mine):

    […] This incident, which did get covered, is what Conway appears to be referring to: “In May [2011], two Iraqi refugees living in Bowling Green, Ky., were charged with trying to send sniper rifles, Stinger missiles and money to the Qaeda affiliate in their home country. Neither of the men, Waad Ramadan Alwan, 30, and Mohanad Shareef Hammadi, 23, was charged with plotting attacks within the United States. A federal sting operation prevented the weapons and money from going to Iraq.”

    The men were arrested, charged, and convicted. They’re both in federal penitentiaries now.

    Because there have been so few incidents like these on American soil, Republicans have tried to use this example of the Iraqis in Bowling Green for all sorts of reasons. Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.), for example, insisted in 2014 that these two men “attempted to attack Fort Knox.”

    If you don’t remember an attempted attack on Fort Knox, it’s because that didn’t actually happen, either.

    All of which leads us to a few simple questions. First, if the Muslim ban were a sound policy, why does the White House keep making stuff up? Second, how much more mileage do Republicans intend to get out of this one incident from 2011?

    And third, how soon will conservatives everywhere convince themselves that the Bowling Green Massacre really did happen, but those darned liberals just refuse to admit it?

    […] Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) claimed this week that there was an “attempted bombing” in Bowling Green. Again, in reality, that never happened. The Kentucky Republican just made this up. […]

    Read more: http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2016/11/05/discuss-moments-of-political-madness-6/#ixzz4XgYoNhlw

  10. chigau (ever-elliptical) says

    I fuuckiing hate dislike the top-pic.
    If you’re changing the thread name…

  11. Ogvorbis: A bear of very little brains. says

    From CNN :

    For the past week, that’s been unclear after President Donald Trump announced a federal government hiring freeze that could’ve affected hires the US National Park Service depends on to serve millions of visitors during the high season.
    Now, it seems, they’re going to be able to open as usual.
    Seasonal and short-term temporary employees “necessary to meet traditionally recurring seasonal workloads,” have been given a break under a list of exemptions to the freeze issued Tuesday.

    Still doesn’t help with permanent employees. At my park, last fall, we had five people transfer to other agencies and other parks. Two in my office. My office lost 25% of our staff. And we have no idea when we’ll be able to hire replacements. And, if the hiring freeze continues long enough, the job slot, and the funding for that slot, disappears.

  12. says

    *waves*

    I won’t be around much for a few more days, but I wanted to pop in to thank everyone for keeping up with and reporting on events and sharing insights. (And thank you Marc Abian for your extraordinarily nice message on the previous thread.)

    The Red Cross Ball tonight at Mar-a-Lago is evidently still a go, despite a planned protest and the moral hideousness of the venue. People are actually saying that the event will raise money that can help people affected by Trump’s ban. The irony is that if the Red Cross were to take a stand and reschedule it elsewhere they would probably raise more money in donations and also earn goodwill going forward. Of course, their historical record on migration is…spotty.

    In related news, more than a thousand doctors and medical professionals have signed an open letter to Cleveland Clinic CEO Toby Cosgrove over his participation in Trump’s Strategic and Policy Forum and the CC’s planned fundraiser at Mar-a-Lago on the 25th (called, I kid you not, “Reflections of Versailles: A Night in the Hall of Mirrors”). I linked in the previous thread to an article about Suha Abushamma, a resident at the Cleveland Clinic who was coerced into leaving the US minutes before the first stay was granted last weekend. Here’s a link to the open letter.

  13. peptron says

    I think that the cover of Der Spiegel wins this round:

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/02/03/trump-beheads-the-statue-of-liberty-in-striking-magazine-cover-illustration/?utm_term=.5ff936e76cc5

    More and more European countries are selling themselves to make sure that, while America is first, they want to make sure they’ll be second. (Best are Swiss and German ones, the guy sounds just like Trump.)

    http://bgr.com/2017/02/03/donald-trump-viral-welcome-video-meme/

  14. What a Maroon, living up to the 'nym says

    Re Bowling Green: it’s worse than even Kellyanne is letting on. I understand that someone there traded in a milking cow for a Singer sewing machine.

    Also, while we’re talking about forgotten massacres, when will the government ever get to the bottom of the Alice’s restaurant massacree?

  15. says

    “Trust Records Show Trump Is Still Closely Tied to His Empire”:

    Just days before his inauguration, President-elect Donald J. Trump stood beside his tax lawyer at a Midtown Manhattan news conference as she announced that he planned to place his vast business holdings in a trust, a move she said would allay fears that he might exploit the Oval Office for personal gain.

    However, a number of questions were left unanswered — including who would ultimately benefit from the trust — raising concerns about just how meaningful the move was.

    Now, records have emerged that show just how closely tied Mr. Trump remains to the empire he built.

    While the president says he has walked away from the day-to-day operations of his business, two people close to him are the named trustees and have broad legal authority over his assets: his eldest son, Donald Jr., and Allen H. Weisselberg, the Trump Organization’s chief financial officer. Mr. Trump, who will receive reports on any profit, or loss, on his company as a whole, can revoke their authority at any time.

    What’s more, the purpose of the Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust is to hold assets for the “exclusive benefit” of the president. This trust remains under Mr. Trump’s Social Security number, at least as far as federal taxes are concerned….

  16. says

    Good news:

    The Department of Homeland Security said Saturday it has suspended all actions to implement President Donald Trump’s immigration order.

    “In accordance with the judge’s ruling, DHS has suspended any and all actions implementing the affected sections of the Executive Order entitled, ‘Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States.’ This includes actions to suspend passenger system rules that flag travelers for operational action subject to the Executive Order,” DHS acting press secretary Gillian Christensen said in a statement….

  17. says

    Speaking of massacres…

    Trump is tweeting again:

    “When a country is no longer able to say who can, and who cannot , come in & out, especially for reasons of safety &.security – big trouble!”

    “Interesting that certain Middle-Eastern countries agree with the ban. They know if certain people are allowed in it’s death & destruction!”

    “The opinion of this so-called judge, which essentially takes law-enforcement away from our country, is ridiculous and will be overturned!”

    Note: “ban,” “so-called judge,” autocratic gesturing

  18. kevinalexander says

    Lynna, OM @9

    …Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.), for example, insisted in 2014 that these two men “attempted to attack Fort Knox.”…

    I saw the same video that he did. They used poison gas spread by planes to make the soldiers fall down, then they put a Chinese nuke in the vaults to irradiate all the gold. The plot was foiled, literally in the last seven seconds, by an MI6 agent.

  19. Ogvorbis: A bear of very little brains. says

    John Prine, Arlo Guthrie, now Bond? Starting to sound like my iPod.

  20. rorschach says

    “Interesting that certain Middle-Eastern countries agree with the ban. They know if certain people are allowed in it’s death & destruction!”

    Like for example certain people from Saudi-Arabia, UAE or Egypt. You know, countries where terrorists have come from.
    More people have died from falling out of bed in the US than from attacks from people from countries on Trump’s ban list.

    More concerning is his tweet about the “so-called” judge and his decision. I’m always surprised when, with any judge’s decision in the US, it is always added who appointed them, as if it mattered. I never hear this in any other country.

  21. says

    Rachel Maddow interviewed former national security adviser to Vice President Biden, Colin Kahl.

    Kahl confirmed that the Trump administration is distorting history “in an attempt to shift the blame for a disastrous military raid onto the Obama administration.” The video is 6:12 minutes long.

    This is a followup to comment 6.

  22. says

    Barbara Morrill had some fun with Trump’s claim that, “Professional anarchists, thugs and paid protesters are proving the point of the millions of people who voted to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!”

    Morrill’s article is topped by a photo a child holding a toy, wearing a pink hat, and raising one soft little fist. The photo is captioned “Los Angeles thug.”

    More at the link, including anarchists holding thugs (parents holding children and babies).

  23. says

    Frank Vyan Walton did us all a service when he took the time to debunk the Heritage Foundation’s “8 reasons to repeal Obamacare.” Trump and his minions depend on Heritage, so it’s good to see this disinformation debunked.

    Excerpt below:

    1) Costs [per the Heritage Foundation]

    Despite repeated promises of premium reductions, Obamacare has delivered major increases.

    In the employer-sponsored market, costs continue to increase. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, average family premiums for employer-sponsored plans have increased almost 32 percent from 2010-2016.

    In the individual market, where the bulk of Obamacare’s new rules and regulations have taken effect, the average nationwide premium increase has been 99 percent for individuals and 140 percent for families from 2013-2017, according to an eHealth report.

    The obvious problem with this is that it doesn’t compare the current increase in costs today to what they had been in the years prior to Obamacare. Yes, healthcare costs rise, they almost always rise — that’s called inflation. Almost nothing goes down in price unless we have a large increase in the available supply and/or a decrease in demand. If people were to stop getting sick, we might see healthcare costs go down, but frankly that has almost never happened.

    […] employer based costs between 2000-2010 the years prior to implementation of the ACA, were considerably higher than they are now. The growth rate following passage of the ACA according to the same Kaiser Foundation cited by Heritage has been 40 percent lower than it had been the previous decade. […]

    So yeah, prices are rising, but not nearly as quickly as they did before. This is not a small deal. The life of the Medicaid trust fund was actually increased by the ACA because of the reduction in costs. […]

    In point of fact the ACA has added 11 years to the solvency of the Medicare Trust fund.

    […] where costs have gone up for people purchasing insurance on the exchange so have subsidies for those that can qualify for them. I would agree that there should be some adjustments for small business who are been forced into other markets or perhaps widen the qualifications for subsidies for those who’ve seen some one-time high price spikes, but for each of these problems many other millions have gained care they couldn’t otherwise access or afford.

    […] the argument that ACA is by definition all bad and super expensive while High Risk pools are some type of viable improvement has already been proven false by past experience. Yes, segregating the sick into high risk pools might bring down costs by possibly as much as 50% for those outside the pool, but for those in the pool prices would skyrocket while services would plummet.

    […] Relative to when the law started there are fewer insurance providers in some markets, but again this is the wrong comparison. Prior to the ACA there were no providers available for people with pre-existing conditions in the individual market at an affordable price. […]

    Much more at the link.

  24. says

    Republicans are now claiming that it will take “moral fortitude and courage” to kill Social Security.

    Well. I’ve seen rightwingers redefine words and phrases before, but that takes the cake.

    [Senator Bob Corker of Tennessee] questioned whether Republicans were willing to pay for a burgeoning military with major financial reforms to entitlement programs like Medicaid, Medicare and Social Security. […]

    “Unless we have the moral fortitude and courage to deal with the elephant in the room, all this other stuff we’re talking about is a total waste of time,” Corker said. “National security is our first responsibility, but leaving the nation greater for other people certainly is up there, and we’re not willing to deal with this?” […]

    Washington Post link

    Ah, yes, more money for bombs and guns … less money for the disabled, the poor and the elderly. Moral fortitude.

  25. KG says

    A very relevant book that I haven’t seen referenced much is It Can’t Happen Here by Sinclair Lewis. – Anne, Cranky Cat Lady @323, previous thread

    On my way home from the latest anti-Trump demo in Edinburgh (about 1,000 people, against the ban, organised in a few days by a previously not-politically-active American Jewish young woman), I saw copies in a bookshop. First UK printing ever, apparently.

  26. slithey tove (twas brillig (stevem)) says

    The NRA has the entire Dumpster swamp in their pocket. The swamp just negated Obama’s Gun Regulatory clause which excludes ‘mentally unstable’ [euphemism] from purchasing guns.
    No matter how deranged one may be, buying a gun is easy as pi.
    While a starving 5 yr old child refugee was denied entry by being a “potential threat”.
    double edged sword:
    most deaths in US are from toddlers wielding guns purchased by “responsible” adults.
    so, okay, threats come at all ages, so exclude the 5 y.o. yet let the insane buy weapons?
    Gun fondlers always say “shooter was insane, and most owners are responsible”….
    ugh… overwhelmed by contradictions.
    *sigh*

  27. slithey tove (twas brillig (stevem)) says

    re @37 SS:
    They always present SS upside down. SS is presented as a “drain on the budget”, when it is usually used to enhance the budget, by borrowing huge amounts of money from it and refusing to repay it. We here all know, SS is funded by the recipients from their paychecks during their employment years as a guaranteed retirement fund. Government funds are never used. Through mortality rates far more people are working and contributing to it than are retired and drawing from it. The feds, seeing the stockpile asked if it could make a temporary loan from it to make emergency payments. Never got paid back and now being claimed as a deficit enhancer.
    *sigh*

  28. says

    Kellyanne Conway’s advise to the press:

    […] if you are not showing the President and his main spokespeople respect, then you’re not showing the office respect, and you are inciting mob mentality if not mob violence.

    Respect is earned.

    Questioning Trump and his spokespeople is not a sign of disrespect.

    Pot meet kettle regarding the mob mentality and mob violence.

  29. says

    slithey tove @40, thanks for that analysis. I agree. It’s enough to make you head/desk yourself bloody.

    Our “oh, FFS!” moment for today is Stuart Taylor being interviewed on Fox News’ “Tucker Carlson Tonight” show:

    […]

    STUART TAYLOR: […]sure, rape is terrible and it happens on campus. Stipulating. The idea that 1 in 5 college women are raped or sexually assaulted more broadly while on campus is absolute nonsense. It comes from surveys by private organizations that have agendas, that ask misleading questions.

    They don’t ask the women were you raped or sexually assaulted because they know they won’t get anywhere near the numbers they want. There are pretty good federal surveys on this. They would suggest that 1 in 100 roughly women are raped during their four years in college, five years, and if you add lesser sexual assaults, less serious ones, you’re up to about 1 in 40 or one in 50. That’s way too many, but it’s not the escalating national crisis that the Obama administration pretended it was.

    CARLSON: Now in tandem with those claims was the idea that basically everyone accused of a sexual misdeed on campus was guilty. And my question from the beginning was, well what happens to those people? Are they able to prove that they’re not guilty if indeed they’re not guilty or is the justice system on campus anything like you’d expect in normal life?

    TAYLOR: No, it’s not at all. It’s a Kafka-esque campus kangaroo courts is my word for them. First, lots of people accused of rape or sexual assault on- and off- campus are not guilty. Especially on-campus, because there are squadrons of sex bureaucrats at all the colleges in the country who are encouraging women to say they were raped when what they really were was regretful afterwards. So no, it’s not 1 in 5.

    Media Matters link

    “Squadrons of sex bureaucrats” … WTF?

  30. says

    Poor people don’t need/deserve? internet connections according to Trump-appointed Federal Communications Commission Chairman Ajit Pai.

    Pai is reducing the federal government’s participation in subsidies for low-income Americans in the “Lifeline” program, a telecommunications program that offered a federal subsidy of $9.25 per month for qualifying households seeking assistance in acquiring internet access.

    […] Regulators are telling nine companies they won’t be allowed to participate in a federal program meant to help them provide affordable Internet access to low-income consumers — weeks after those companies had been given the green light.

    The move, announced Friday by FCC Chairman Ajit Pai, reverses a decision by his Democratic predecessor, Tom Wheeler, and undercuts the companies’ ability to provide low-cost Internet access to poorer Americans. […]

    As many as 13 million Americans may be eligible for Lifeline but do not have broadband service at home, the FCC has found. […]

    Until last year, Lifeline recipients could only apply their federal benefit toward landline and mobile voice service. Significant changes to the program under Wheeler let beneficiaries, for the first time, use their credits to purchase broadband. The expansion was opposed by Pai and other Republican officials, who argued that the measure did not do enough to rein in potential costs or to control waste, fraud and abuse. […]

    Quoted text is from the Washington Post.

    Previous, Obama-era chairman, Tom Wheeler had made the point that, “Internet access has become a pre-requisite for full participation in our economy and our society.”

    Fox News and other rightwing media outlets derided the program from the start, short-handing it as “Obamaphones.” The associated rightwing conspiracy theory is that President Obama handed out free phones as a way to buy votes, and as a way to “enslave the poor.”

  31. raven says

    Republicans are now claiming that it will take “moral fortitude and courage” to kill Social Security.

    Oddly enough, both Medicare and Social Security don’t cost the government anything.
    They are self supporting paygo programs.
    The taxpayers get money out of these programs. That they paid into these programs!!!

    The last time the GOP tried to kill Medicare was 2005.
    A whole lot of them got voted out of office in 2006 because of it.

    It doesn’t take moral fortitude and courage to kill Social Security.
    It takes greed, theft, and a callous disregard for the people that live in the USA and pay taxes to make our government.

  32. says

    This is a followup to rorschach @33 and SC @29.

    Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer responded to Trump’s tweet attacking Judge Robart:

    The President’s attack on Judge James Robart, a Bush appointee who passed with 99 votes, shows a disdain for an independent judiciary that doesn’t always bend to his wishes and a continued lack of respect for the Constitution, making it more important that the Supreme Court serve as an independent check on the administration.

    With each action testing the Constitution, and each personal attack on a judge, President Trump raises the bar even higher for Judge Gorsuch’s nomination to serve on the Supreme Court. His ability to be an independent check will be front and center throughout the confirmation process.

    An excerpt from Judge Robart’s written order:

    […] the court finds that the states have met their burden of demonstrating that they face immediate and irreparable injury as a result of the signing and implementation of the Executive Order. The Executive Order adversely affects the states’ residents in the areas of employment, education, business, family relations and freedom to travel. […]

    The States themselves are harmed by virtue of the damage that implementation of the Executive Order has inflicted on the operations and missions of their public universities and other institutions of higher learning, as well as injury to the States’ operations, tax bases and public funds. […]

  33. Pierce R. Butler says

    Lynna, OM @ # 42 – Pls note Nate’s note on the agenda of the newly appointed higher-education “reform” commission head:

    Falwell has been particularly interested in curbing rules that require schools to investigate campus sexual assault …

  34. says

    Trump’s pick for Deputy Director of the CIA is raising some eyebrows.

    Gina Haspel oversaw interrogations that included “enhanced techniques” like waterboarding and other harsh or illegal methods.

    […] for some Democrats, elevating Haspel to deputy director of the agency is a clear sign that the administration is weighing a return to the use of banned techniques now considered torture […]

    Lawmakers are circumspect about addressing Haspel’s role in the program publicly — only a heavily-redacted 500-page executive summary of the Senate report has been declassified — but have hinted heavily where their concerns lie.

    Sens. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) on Thursday fired off a letter to Trump warning that “her background makes her unsuitable for the position.”

    “We are sending separately a classified letter explaining our position and urge that the information in that letter be immediately declassified,” they wrote. […]

    Opponents of the use of torture — including some Republicans, like Sen. John McCain (Ariz.) — have watched the Trump administration warily for signs that it will try to resurrect techniques since outlawed by Congress.

    Trump in an interview told ABC News last month that he “absolutely” thinks that waterboarding works and would consider reinstating it as if senior administration officials think it’s necessary. […]

    Link

  35. says

    Wonkette’s coverage of Trump’s Muslim ban is excellent.

    […] After “President” Donald Trump issued his prima facie unlawful executive order stopping travel for even permanent US residents — illegal on its face due to the 1965 law stating there may not be discrimination in the issuance of visas based on national origin — several federal judges ordered him to back the fuck down, stop canceling people’s legally issued visas, and inform airlines that they must allow people with valid visas to travel to the US.

    Trump and his Customs and Border Patrol declined to do so, because of how they’re a fucking junta.

    But now, with last night’s judicial order by “so-called judge” James Robart, DHS has backed the fuck down from pretty much every one of the executive order’s crap elements. […]

    From the Washington Post:

    […] Respectfully but firmly, the retired general and longtime Marine [Homeland Security Secretary John F. Kelly] told Bannon that despite his high position in the White House and close relationship with Trump, the former Breitbart chief was not in Kelly’s chain of command, two administration officials said. If the president wanted Kelly to back off from issuing the waiver, Kelly would have to hear it from the president directly, he told Bannon. […]

    At approximately 2 a.m. Sunday morning, according to the two officials, a conference call of several top officials was convened to discuss the ongoing confusion over the executive order and the anger from Cabinet officials over their lack of inclusion in the process in advance. […]

    One White House official and one administration official told me that Kelly, Mattis and Tillerson presented a united front and complained about the process that led to the issuance of the immigration executive order, focusing on their near-complete lack of consultation as well as the White House’s reluctance to make what they saw as common-sense revisions, such as exempting green-card holders.

    Later on Sunday, a larger senior staff meeting was convened with White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus, senior adviser Jared Kushner and Trump himself, where all tried to make sense of the process and chart a path forward.

    The president made a decision at that meeting that, following the already scheduled rollout of a executive order on regulatory reforms, all other executive orders would be held up until a process was established that included the input of key officials outside the White House. […]

    That’s right, Trump and his minions needed to figure out what the hell was going on in their own cabal.

    And, yes, sometimes public pressure and protest work … or sort of work until Trump tweets again.

    Trump banned the issuance of his own executive orders, for the time being.

  36. says

    Trump blathered all over Twitter in order to insult and to threaten Iran. Trump’s lackey, General Flynn used the White House briefing to air his insults and threats. Nobody really knew what the heck they were going to do, but the Trump administration did issue some new sanctions against Iran; sanctions that were, for the most part, petty and ineffective, sanctions for which they did not secure the backing of the U.N. and our allies.

    What happened next? Today, Iran carried out additional missile tests as planned.

    […] The country successfully tested a range of land-to-land missiles and radar systems during the drills in a 35,000 square-kilometer stretch of desert in the northern Iranian province of Semnan, the semi-official Tasnim agency reported Saturday, citing Amir Ali Hajizadeh, commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps’ aerospace division. […]

    The quoted text is from Bloomberg.

    Also, Iran is threatening to issue its own sanctions, “against a number of American individuals and companies that have played a role in generating and supporting extremist terrorist groups in the region or have helped in the killing and suppression of defenseless people in the region.”

    Well. This does not look like it is going to end well.

  37. says

    An excerpt from Virginia’s complaint against Trump’s Muslim ban:

    […] This is a monumental case involving a monumental abuse of Executive Power. So it is worth remembering another monumental case, Plessy v. Ferguson, that enshrined in American law—for more than a half century—the approval of government-mandated racial segregation. The majority in Plessy reasoned that government-mandated segregation “does not discriminate against either race, but prescribes a rule applicable alike to white and colored citizens.” We admire the first Justice Harlan for putting the lie to that claim: “Every one knows” what was being justified, he said. The same is true here.

    And what Justice Harlan said next may be even more important for Twenty-First Century Americans to remember: “the seeds of race hate” should not be “planted under the sanction of law.”

    In this case, the seeds of hate towards Muslims are “planted under the sanction” of the Executive Order. Those seeds must be rooted out, as soon as possible, lest they germinate and poison more Americans. The Executive Order was conceived in bigotry and does not reflect who we are as a people. […]

    https://www.scribd.com/document/338348209/Virginia-complaint

  38. Bill Buckner says

    #28,

    I’m amazed at how little attention has been paid to the real terrorist plot by Radical Christian Extremists to bomb a mosque and apartment complex in Kansas a few months ago.

    Indeed, I for one hadn’t heard about that. However, I am wondering what you based your claim that they were “Radical Christian Extremists” on? The link (unless I missed it) does not identify the group as such. Is it just because the delusions-of-grandeur name of their group is “Crusaders”, or do you know more about these nuts? Because they could be garden variety racists who simply chose the name “Crusaders” purely for its anti-Islam significance without being radical Christians.

  39. Bill Buckner says

    #30,

    I saw the same video that he did. They used poison gas spread by planes to make the soldiers fall down, then they put a Chinese nuke in the vaults to irradiate all the gold. The plot was foiled, literally in the last seven seconds, by an MI6 agent.

    Brilliant!

  40. goaded says

    #40 “Never got paid back and now being claimed as a deficit enhancer” That’s Trump’s MO, he’s never seen an entity that would lend him money as anything but a sucker.

  41. consciousness razor says

    Bill Buckner, #51:

    However, I am wondering what you based your claim that they were “Radical Christian Extremists” on? The link (unless I missed it) does not identify the group as such.

    It’s not so surprising that a local news site wouldn’t do that, is it? I mean, what does the lack of that kind of description in their reporting really tell you?

    As SC remarked, there’s not even been much reporting about it of any kind. That’s partly because Christians, as the dominant religious group in our culture, are given so much latitude to do all sorts of shit, while not being held responsible or even recognized as a source of the problem.

    Is it just because the delusions-of-grandeur name of their group is “Crusaders”, or do you know more about these nuts? Because they could be garden variety racists who simply chose the name “Crusaders” purely for its anti-Islam significance without being radical Christians.

    Well, lots of things are possible, but I think that’s unlikely. They’re not likely to be atheists or members of a non-Christian religion in the first place, demographically speaking. That’s leaving aside anything we may know about bombing suspects or religious disputes or whatever else; and it’s simply to say that if you throw a rock in any direction here, you’re more likely to hit a Christian than a non-Christian, because they’re a much larger chunk of the population.

    Also, if a group of atheists or members of a non-Christian religion were planning to bomb a bunch of Muslims, they probably wouldn’t seriously refer to themselves as “Crusaders.” (It’s worth pointing out that the historical Crusaders weren’t just on the warpath against Islam, but anybody else who might have got in their way.) If they were non-Christians who were aware at all of its significance, they’d smell some very strong hints of Christian imperialism and evangelism in it, which would presumably seem inappropriate to them. I mean, suppose they were all Buddhists or whatever…. Why would they be inclined toward a blatantly Christian name like that, as opposed to something that actually makes sense within their own religious or cultural traditions? Buddhists don’t go around murdering people for baby Jesus or planting crosses everywhere like they were flags; they do other kinds of terrible shit for other terrible reasons.

    As for “Radical” and “Extremists,” those just come with the territory of bomb plots in my book. So even if your flavor of Christianity (or whatever it may be) is mild in theological terms or in some other sense, I’m not going to consider that a reason to be shy about labels like radical, extremist, and so forth.

  42. says

    More evidence of incompetence at the most basic levels: A memo released from the White House today listed two Secretaries of Defense, James Mattis and John Kelly. It’s Mattis who is Secretary of Defense. Kelly is Secretary of Homeland Security.

    The same document mentions Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull as “President of Australia.”

    We can add these recent mistakes to the memo they released last month that misspelled the name of British Prime Minister Theresa May several times.

    Doofuses and dunderheads.

  43. says

    Matt Taibbi discussed Trump’s recent meeting with a bunch of Wall Street CEOs. The meeting included discussions of financial regulations. After the meeting, Trump ordered a review of the Dodd-Frank Act, and of the fiduciary rule that requires investment advisors to put the interests of their clients first.

    […] Dimon [J.P. Morgan], Schwarzman [Blackstone], Fink [BlackRock] and Cohn [Goldman Sachs] collectively represent a rogues gallery of the creeps most responsible for the 2008 crash. It would be hard to put together a group of people less sympathetic to the non-wealthy.

    Trump’s approach to Wall Street is in sharp contrast to his tough-talking stances on terrorism. He talks a big game when slamming the door on penniless refugees, but curls up like a beach weakling around guys who have more money than he does.

    The two primary disasters in American history this century (if we’re not counting Trump’s election) have been 9/11 and the 2008 financial crisis, which cost 8.7 million people their jobs and may have destroyed as much as 45 percent of the world’s wealth. […]

    In between, we passed a few weak-sauce rules designed to scale back some of the worst excesses. Those rules presumably will be tossed aside now.

    Trump’s “extreme vetting” plan for immigrants and refugees is based upon a safety argument – i.e., that the smallest chance of a disaster justifies the most extreme measures. Infamously this week, administration spokesdunce Kellyanne Conway resorted to citing a disaster that never even happened – the “Bowling Green Massacre” – as a justification for the crazy visa policy.

    This makes Trump’s embrace of the Mortgage Crash Dream Team as his advisory panel for how to make Wall Street run more smoothly all the more preposterous.

    The crisis was caused by the financial equivalent of open borders. Virtually no one was monitoring risk levels or credit worthiness at the world’s biggest companies.

    The watchdogs who are supposed to be making sure the morons on Wall Street don’t blow up the planet all failed […]

    These companies are now so enormous that they can’t keep track of their own positions. Also, in sharp contrast to the propaganda about what brainy people they all are, many of them lack even the most basic understanding of the potential consequences of deals they might be making.

    The leadership of AIG, for instance, basically had no clue how its derivatives portfolio worked, despite the fact that they had $79 billion worth of exposure. […]

    Not only can they not keep track of their own books, they already blow off regulators whenever they get the chance. Take JPMorgan Chase’s “London Whale” episode, in which some $6.2 billion in losses in one portfolio accumulated practically overnight. In that case, Dimon simply refused to give the federal regulators routine, required reports as to what was going on with his bank’s positions, probably because he himself had no idea how big the hole was at the time.

    “Mr. Dimon said it was his decision whether to send the reports to the OCC,” a regulator later told the Senate.

    This is the same Jamie Dimon about whom Trump said today, “There’s nobody better to tell me about Dodd-Frank than Jamie Dimon, so thank you, Jamie.”

    The enduring lesson of the financial crisis is that in markets as complex as this one, the most extreme danger is in opacity. The big problem is that these egomaniacal Wall Street titans want markets as opaque as possible. […]

  44. says

    Trump continues to reveal his delusions about immigration issues, and his animus toward Judge Robart:

    What is our country coming to when a judge can halt a Homeland Security travel ban and anyone, even with bad intentions, can come into U.S.?

    Because the ban was lifted by a judge, many very bad and dangerous people may be pouring into our country. A terrible decision

    Keep it up, Trump. As Matthew Miller said,

    With every tweet, he is just making it harder and harder for DOJ attorneys to win in court. So keep it up, I guess.

    Miller is a Partner at Vianovo in Washington D.C. He describes himself as a “Recovering flack from DOJ, DSCC, and too many campaigns to count.”

  45. tomh says

    Judge Robart is an interesting case. Known as a conservative judge, and praised by the likes of Orrin Hatch during his confirmation hearings, he’s considered a tough sentencing judge in criminal matters, yet during a hearing on reforms at the Seattle Police Department, he said:

    “According to FBI statistics, police shootings resulting in death involve 41 percent black people, despite being only 20 percent of the population living in those cities. Forty-one percent of the casualties, 20 percent of the population: Black lives matter.”

    A rather remarkable statement from a stalwart conservative judge.

  46. says

    Not a huge fan of NDGT, but he does make a very valid point here that I don’t think has crossed the minds of many red staters. So maybe there’s a reason the red states are suffering economically and it’s not cuz Obama or mexicans or the chinese are stealing their jobs?

    If national leaders and local school boards want to ignore science, Tyson said that’s fine with him.
    But, he said, let’s say he’s the chief executive officer of a corporation that’s looking for a site for its headquarters.
    “It’s not going to be in your state,” Tyson said. “The future companies need science literacy for their R&D, for advancements, for innovation. And so your state will fade among the 50. That’s a consequence.”

    Besides tax codes that benefit the wealthy and punish the poor, and racist immigration policies, Trumputin threatens to cripple the US economy by abolishing science from the halls of government. Wonderful.

  47. says

    However, I am wondering what you based your claim that they were “Radical Christian Extremists” on? The link (unless I missed it) does not identify the group as such.

    Thanks, cr, for responding above. I think also I originally read the reports in the NYT and WaPo, which note that they were militia members and linked to the Sovereign Citizen movement. It’s all in the same soup as the Christian Identity movement. I don’t know what documents they saw, but WaPo said they sought to “use the ‘bloodbath’ to ignite a religious war.” And yes, “the Crusaders.” (This background is also interesting.)

  48. says

    Trump better hope none of his opponents are murdered, or his Putin comments and his “I could kill someone on 5th Avenue” remark during the election may come back to haunt him.

  49. robro says

    Lynna, OM @ #35 — Any scuttlebutt on the “anarchists” that have violently disrupted peaceful demonstrations against several Milo Yiannopoulus’s speaking engagements, causing the events to be canceled? As a result, poor Milo and the Trumpsters get to fulminate about freeze peach and threaten to pull Federal funding for the offending institutions…because it’s the institution’s fault, of course. Interesting that TweeterDumb is tweeting about “professional anarchists”…non sequitur of the day?…and “paid protesters.” Could TweeterDumb be projecting again? Robert Reich says he saw the Black Bloc styled protesters in Berkeley and that they were not students…he doesn’t say how he knows that. He’s is suspicious. I recognize this is close to irrational conspiracy theory, but it wouldn’t be the first false flag operation in the history of the American politics.

  50. unclefrogy says

    I don’t really see how they can say that the cancelling of the speech has anything to do with free speech or the abridging there of as he is not restricted from speaking they just judged that it was too disruptive to allow the speech to be given on the campus grounds.
    May be I am missing some thing essential here.
    uncle frogy

  51. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    http://my.xfinity.com/articles/news-national/20170205/US–Trump.Travel.Ban-Lawsuit/

    A federal appeals court denied early Sunday the Justice Department’s request for an immediate reinstatement of President Donald Trump’s ban on accepting certain travelers and all refugees.
    The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco instead asked challengers of the ban respond to the appeal filed by the Trump administration late Saturday night, and for the Justice Department to file a counter-response by Monday afternoon.
    The Trump administration declared that a federal judge in Seattle overstepped his authority by temporarily blocking the ban nationwide. Now the higher court’s denial of an immediate stay means the legal battles will continue for days at least.

    The the crybaby continue to cry that he can’t play dictator.

  52. says

    I wish I’d known that I could be an anarchist professionally. :(

    Robert Reich says he saw the Black Bloc styled protesters in Berkeley and that they were not students…he doesn’t say how he knows that. He’s is suspicious. I recognize this is close to irrational conspiracy theory, but it wouldn’t be the first false flag operation in the history of the American politics.

    It’s certainly possible that some protesters, even students, were violent. It happens. But I also strongly suspect paid thugs or agents provocateurs. (Incidentally, there’s a book by Uri Eisenzweig, Fictions de l’anarchisme, which isn’t great, but as I recall provides a pretty detailed and useful history of the tactics European police/security forces used against the anarchist movement at the turn of the twentieth century. The US has a long history of similar programs, even long before COINTELPRO.)

  53. fishy says

    I just like to say that bowling isn’t very green. It uses a lot of plastics and other oil products.

  54. says

    He’s actually trying to compete with the Superbowl for ratings, his ego knows no bounds. He needs people to be talking about him and not football. Most politicians are happy to let the masses have their opiate, not him.

  55. Ichthyic says

    The the crybaby continue to cry that he can’t play dictator.

    oh, there’s plenty he’s getting away with.

    I think he’s playing the role of fascist dictator ala Mussolini quite well.

    just wait until he gets his death squads rolling.

    what? you think I’m joking?

    the longer you all wait to physically oust this clown, and ALL of his supporters in congress, the worse it’s gonna get. mark my words.

    you simply do not have time to wait for a new vote. blockade trump tower. stop him from having access to the white house. do the same to congress.

    this shit has to stop, now.

  56. says

    Ichthyic – that’s called a coup d’état. It’s not going to happen. We have to concentrate on real, legal opposition. This weekend has brought good news on that front.

  57. slithey tove (twas brillig (stevem)) says

    re uncle frogy wrote @68

    I don’t really see how they can say that the cancelling of the speech has anything to do with free speech or the abridging there of as he is not restricted from speaking they just judged that it was too disruptive to allow the speech to be given on the campus grounds.

    seems to fit right into their usual contradictory attitudes.
    They’ll complain mightily about protesters abusing free speech and that it should rightfully be stopped, yet when a private venue refuses to allow them to speak, they complain freeze peach is being violated against the law allowing freeze peach.
    Totally misunderstanding that the 1st amendment limits which laws the government can make, not the actions of the people.
    *sigh*
    ?

  58. says

    I don’t know about the “Black Bloc” protestors in Berkeley. If they were paid, then some serious investigative journalism needs to be done.

    I do know that the rightwing claim that protestors are being paid to protest Trump’s policies is laughable.

    For example, Tennessee State Senator Paul Bailey was certain the protesters were being paid. He was so sure that he posted this:

    Despite what the media may report several of the protesters admitted that they had been paid to be at the TN Capitol.

    Questioned about his questionable claim, Bailey said this:

    I do have a reliable source that had reported to me, in regards to protesters that were here on the capitol grounds Monday night, that they were being paid to be here. At this time I cannot reveal that source because of security reasons.

    WKRN link

    Are you laughing yet?

    Here is a high-quality debunking of Bailey’s claims from the Nashville Scene:

    There’s just one big problem with Maynard’s claim — the “paid buses” are actually Nashville Downtown Partnership parking shuttles. And the reason those shuttles were parked at the Capitol last Monday night was not to ferry protesters to and from their cars, but to ferry legislators to and from the Ryman, where Metro lobbyists hosted a reception featuring members of the cast of Nashville. Which means the buses were “paid” — and that money came from the tax dollars of Nashvillians, not billionaire Democratic donor Soros — but it also means that neither Maynard nor Bailey bothered to read the signage on the buses. […]

    Nashville Scene link. Video also available at the link.

  59. raven says

    I do have a reliable source that had reported to me, in regards to protesters that were here on the capitol grounds Monday night, that they were being paid to be here. At this time I cannot reveal that source because of security reasons.

    If you translate that into English, it means, “Something I just made up.”

    During the anti-Vietnam war days, the GOP was always blaming outside agitators.

  60. says

    Trump told a lie in reference to military purchases. Trump credited himself for savings on the F-35 fighter program.

    Senator Jack Reed debunked that lie:

    President Donald Trump claims that his intervention forced Lockheed Martin to reduce the cost of its F-35 airplane to the Pentagon, but the ranking Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee says that’s not true. […]

    After Spicer took credit for the president Friday, Sen. Jack Reed of Rhode Island, the ranking Armed Services Democrat, responded more bluntly.

    “This is simply taking credit for what’s been in the works for many months,” Reed told CNBC in a telephone interview. “These are savings that would have happened anyway.”

    http://www.cnbc.com/2017/02/03/trumps-claims-of-saving-millions-on-f-35-fighter-untrue-says-armed-services-committee-dem.html

  61. says

    Early today (Sunday, February 5) a federal appeals court denied a request for an immediate reinstatement of Trump’s recent immigration/Muslim ban. At some point, you almost have to feel sorry for Justice Department lawyers who have to file such appeals. The language in the appeal sounds dictatorial, Trumpian.

    Acting Solicitor General Noel Francisco forcefully argued Saturday night that the president alone has the power to decide who can enter or stay in the United States […]

    “The power to expel or exclude aliens is a fundamental sovereign attribute, delegated by Congress to the executive branch of government and largely immune from judicial control,” the brief says.

    […] the government’s brief repeatedly asserts that presidential authority cannot be questioned by judges once the nation’s security is invoked.

    Congress “vests complete discretion in the President” to impose conditions on alien entry, so Trump isn’t legally required to justify such decisions, it says. His executive order said the ban is necessary for “protecting against terrorism,” and that “is sufficient to end the matter.” […]

    Hearings have also been held in court challenges nationwide. Washington state and Minnesota argued that the temporary ban and the global suspension of the U.S. refugee program harmed residents and effectively mandated discrimination.

    In his written order Friday, Robart said it’s not the court’s job to “create policy or judge the wisdom of any particular policy promoted by the other two branches,” but rather, to make sure that an action taken by the government “comports with our country’s laws.”

    The Justice Department countered that “judicial second-guessing of the President’s national security determination in itself imposes substantial harm on the federal government and the nation at large.”

    Talking Points Memo link

  62. says

    Another one of Trump’s lies has been debunked. This time the lie was debunked by Kuwait.

    […] Trump posted a story on his official Facebook page which contended that Kuwait issued a visa ban for five Muslim-majority countries.

    Trump’s post, which is still up as of Sunday morning, read: “Smart!

    ‘Kuwait issues its own Trump-esque visa ban for five Muslim-majority countries | Al Bawaba,’” citing the source of the information.

    It has some 250,000 likes,over 68,000 shares, and was picked up by Breitbart and Infowars. But there’s one problem: Kuwait denies that anything of this sort ever took place.

    The foreign ministry of the Middle Eastern country “categorically denies these claims and affirms that these reported nationalities … have big communities in Kuwait and enjoy full rights,” […]

    It then went from Trump’s mouth to his most fervent online support base’s ears.

    On February 2, the conspiracy-hub InfoWars ran with the story citing reporting by Sputnik International, a Russian-government news agency. […]

    Similarly Breitbart, a predominantly pro-Trump outlet whose CEO Steve Bannon is now a White House counselor, published a story on the unverified ban citing Trump’s own original source.

    As of Sunday morning, Breitbart, Infowars and the President of the United States have not issued corrections or amendments to their posts about the story.

    Link

  63. blf says

    It’s not entirely clear, but it is possible the 2017 vintage false Kuwait ban story originated with Sputnik, the Russian news agency. “Russia” is not necessarily a coincidence there, and in any case, the Sputnik agency is known to be quite unreliable.

  64. dhabecker says

    Ode to a pig (or too much time on my hands)

    What’s that I hear?
    Carnage!
    What do I see?
    A process laid waste.
    Slashing blindly thru our common ethos.
    Trashing the good, sincere and renowned.
    Our mothers, our sisters, beliefs and war heroes.
    Stomping principle, reputation and truth to ground.

    What’s that I hear?
    Carnage!
    We see it across our land.
    Death by guns.
    Death by cars.
    Death by drugs.
    Death from hate and wars.
    Death from disease.
    Death from pollution.
    Death from ignorance and want.

    Death has no sound.
    Dying does.
    Wounded; Injured; Sick; Hungry.
    Crying in despair.
    Do you hear?

    Yes he does!
    Stop the Muslim, they’re the foe
    Give no freedom, lay them low!
    Even though they are no threat?
    Kill them quickly, because I know.

    What’s that I hear?
    A boastful solution with a bigly sound.
    I can fix it! Where do I sign?
    See; that was easy, meant to confound.
    See me, see my wall.
    Keep the bad dudes at bay
    See me, see my name
    High on towers across the land.
    See me, hear my boast
    ISIS; no problem, they’re toast
    See me, see my fame.

    What’s that I hear?
    Bluster and rattling sword
    His words are profound
    Friends and enemy, threats point toward.

    What’s that I hear?
    We have been loosed from bad regulation!
    Forget Wall Street abuses and deadly pollution.
    We have been saved from threats to our nation!
    Though threats are unfounded, we found a solution.

    “I picked a great judge, my base is quite happy.”
    Tho with Scalia, their lives were still crappy.

    What’s that I hear?
    Quibbling press; -so corrupt.
    Steve; go tell them
    Shut the fuck up!

    What’s that I hear, it makes no sound?
    A tweet storm, yes, clever and sharp.
    Pay it no mind, it’s just as effective
    As long dead Nero plucking his harp.

    Don’t worry folks, it’s just his style.
    Bombast, insult, a grown-up crybaby
    His words can inspire or set you to screaming
    Just like his trust, piles of steaming.

    If the smoke ever clears, what’s been achieved?
    Can’t ask the question, lest he be peaved.
    If the smoke ever clears, and we check the list
    We hope what’s destroyed, will not be missed.

    What’s that I hear?
    At the end
    Could it be so perverse?
    The story of Scrooge, run in reverse.

  65. says

    Forgive me if it’s already been posted, but the PPP poll from a few days ago is something:

    Less than 2 weeks into Donald Trump’s tenure as President, 40% of voters already want to impeach him. That’s up from 35% of voters who wanted to impeach him a week ago. Only 48% of voters say that they would be opposed to Trump’s impeachment.

    Beyond a significant percentage of voters already thinking that Trump should be removed from office, it hasn’t taken long for voters to miss the good old days of Barack Obama…52% say they’d rather Obama was President, to only 43% who are glad Trump is.

    Why so much unhappiness with Trump? Voters think basically everything he’s doing is wrong:…

  66. What a Maroon, living up to the 'nym says

    sc,

    I wish I’d known that I could be an anarchist professionally.

    Only if you’re admitted to the Anarchist Guild. And they’re very picky about who they admit–mostly just legacy cases.

  67. says

    Oh, oh no.

    […] Senior officials have been soliciting guidance from national security agencies on how to improve relations with Russia, asking what Washington could offer Moscow and what Trump should seek from Russian President Vladimir Putin. Tillerson requested a briefing on moving the U.S. Embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, one of Trump’s campaign promises.

    According to one U.S. official, national security aides have sought information about Polish incursions in Belarus, an eyebrow-raising request because little evidence of such activities appears to exist. Poland is among the Eastern European nations worried about Trump’s friendlier tone on Russia. […]

    As Josh Marshall pointed out, this is “the kind of thing you would expect to hear from Russian propaganda sources, a hostile Poland menacing its neighbors to the east.”
    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/deeply-disturbing–2

  68. says

    This is a followup to comments 45, 48, 58, 59 and 79.

    Trump is still carrying on a one-sided Twitter war against Judge Robart.

    Today, Sunday, Trump tweeted:

    Just cannot believe a judge would put our country in such peril. If something happens blame him and court system. People pouring in. Bad!

    I have instructed Homeland Security to check people coming into our country VERY CAREFULLY. The courts are making the job very difficult!

    WTF? So now it is the judge’s fault if “something happens” that involves an immigrant? Also, “people are pouring in” is obviously misleading hyperbole.

  69. says

    (Again, sorry if this has already been posted.)

    “USDA abruptly purges animal welfare information from its website”:

    The U.S. Department of Agriculture on Friday abruptly removed inspection reports and other information from its website about the treatment of animals at thousands of research laboratories, zoos, dog breeding operations and other facilities.

    In a statement, the USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service cited court rulings and privacy laws for the decision, which it said was the result of a “comprehensive review” that took place over the past year. It said the removed documents, which also included records of enforcement actions against violators of the Animal Welfare Act and the Horse Protection Act, would now be accessible only via Freedom of Information Act Requests. Those can take years to be approved.

    The records that had been available were frequently used by animal welfare advocates to monitor government regulation of animal treatment at circuses, scientific labs and zoos. Journalists have used the documents to expose violations at universities….

    On that note, back to Kitten Bowl IV.

  70. says

    Trump is still convinced that millions voted illegally in the election. He says he wants Pence to lead an investigation into the issue.
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2017/02/05/trump-says-pence-will-head-investigation-into-voting-irregularities-despite-lack-of-evidence-of-fraud/?utm_term=.d41fe60b8e6b

    Meanwhile Mitch McConnell won’t be authorising money for Trump’s fishing expedition, making me wonder if he’s worried what it might find.
    http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/05/politics/mitch-mcconnell-voter-fraud-states-trump/

  71. robro says

    SC @ #70 & Lynna @#79 — The speculation isn’t so much about paid provocateurs, although that’s a possibility, as much as Breitbart fellow travelers who create trouble to get the events canceled. “Forced to cancel because of protesters” has more press appeal than “Milo speaks” to a largely empty hall.

  72. says

    The speculation isn’t so much about paid provocateurs, although that’s a possibility, as much as Breitbart fellow travelers who create trouble to get the events canceled. “Forced to cancel because of protesters” has more press appeal than “Milo speaks” to a largely empty hall.

    Here’s Reich’s assessment of what Milo, Breitbart, and Trump are up to:…

    I could definitely see that being what they’re up to.

  73. procyon says

    And on the Fake News front (from Gideon Resnick at The Daily Beast)

    At 12:25 p.m. on February 2, President Trump posted a story on his official Facebook page which contended that Kuwait issued a visa ban for five Muslim-majority countries.

    Trump’s post, which is still up as of Sunday morning, read: “Smart!

    ‘Kuwait issues its own Trump-esque visa ban for five Muslim-majority countries | Al Bawaba,’” citing the source of the information.

    It has some 250,000 likes,over 68,000 shares, and was picked up by Breitbart and Infowars. But there’s one problem: Kuwait denies that anything of this sort ever took place.

    The foreign ministry of the Middle Eastern country “categorically denies these claims and affirms that these reported nationalities … have big communities in Kuwait and enjoy full rights,” according to a Sunday morning report in Reuters.

    The story shared by Trump had alleged that “Syrians, Iraqis, Iranians, Pakistanis and Afghans will not be able to obtain visit, tourism or trade Kuwaiti visas with the news coming one day after the US slapped its own restrictions on seven Muslim-majority countries.” The story in the Jordanian news outlet Al Bawaba did not have an official statement or order from the Kuwaiti government—nor from any of the countries it said were facing a ban.

    It then went from Trump’s mouth to his most fervent online support base’s ears.
    etc etc

    And this is how Alternate Facts get spread in the right wing Conspirasphere and become part of the Alternate Reality

  74. says

    In other populist news, the Red Cross Ball:

    The event “From Vienna to Versailles,” took place Saturday night at the Mar-a-Lago Club, which was done up in Old World 18th-century style, right down to the service staff in powdered wigs and satin knee breeches or Marie Antoinette dresses.

    “Yes,” said one server, when asked if the wig was hot. “And it weighs four pounds.”

    The night began with the diplomatic receiving line and cocktails around the balustraded pool, a fireworks display over the Intracoastal which gave the smattering of protesters the best views, and classical music by Hapzburg-costumed musicians.

    After cocktails, the crowd moved to the Grand Ballroom — conceived and constructed to look like Versailles’ Hall of Mirrors, making it the perfect foil for the gold-rimmed china and snow-white table linens and mounds of all-white flowers — for the presentation of the colors by the Marines from the local ANGLICO unit, and the diplomatic procession which ended with the introduction of the President and First Lady.

  75. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    Nearly 100 companies file a friend of the court brief against Trump’s executive order on immigration.

    Nearly 100 companies, including Apple , Google and Microsoft , banded together on Sunday to file a legal brief opposing President Donald Trump’s temporary travel ban, arguing that it “inflicts significant harm on American business.”
    The brief, filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, included Facebook , Twitter , Intel , eBay , Netflix and Uber [UBER.UL], as well as non-tech companies such as Levi Strauss [LEVST.UL] and Chobani.
    Trump’s executive order of Jan. 27, the most contentious policy move of his first two weeks in office, faces crucial legal hurdles. A federal judge in Seattle on Friday blocked the move, and the Trump administration has a deadline on Monday to justify the action, which temporarily barred entry to the United States by people from seven mostly Muslim countries, as well as suspending the U.S. refugee program.
    “The Order represents a significant departure from the principles of fairness and predictability that have governed the immigration system of the United States for more than fifty years,” the brief from the companies stated.
    “The Order inflicts significant harm on American business, innovation, and growth as a result,” it added.
    “Immigrants or their children founded more than 200 of the companies on the Fortune 500 list.”
    U.S. tech companies, which employ many foreign-born nationals, have been among the most vocal groups in speaking out against Trump’s travel order, which he has defended as necessary to ensure closer vetting of people coming into the country and better protect the country from the threat of terrorist attacks.

  76. says

    Wikileaks is now moving on to Macron. (See here for some new background.) Could French voters really be looking at what’s happening in the US and thinking “It would be great if things could be more like that here”? Watching A French Village and feeling nostalgic? Thinking Putin’s Oppression, Nationalism, Cronyism would make a good replacement for Liberty, Equality, Solidarity?

  77. says

    Since I know many of you don’t sports well, a brief summary of the political tone of the some of the superbowl commercials: http://www.nj.com/entertainment/index.ssf/2017/02/super_bowl_2017_commercials_10_best.html

    and a bonus, Lady Gaga’s subtle political statement / superbowl halftime performance goes right over the heads of the media and most Americans:

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2017/02/06/if-you-thought-lady-gagas-halftime-show-was-apolitical-consider-the-origin-of-this-land-is-your-land/?utm_term=.6ae4808c2aab

  78. says

    Wikileaks is now moving on to Macron. (See here for some new background.) Could French voters really be looking at what’s happening in the US and thinking “It would be great if things could be more like that here”? Watching A French Village and feeling nostalgic? Thinking Putin’s Oppression, Nationalism, Cronyism would make a good replacement for Liberty, Equality, Solidarity?

    Apparently the answer is “yes”.
    Funny enough, you don’t need to dig deep to find shit about Marine lePen…

  79. says

    You have got to be kidding me.

    When Trump signed an Executive Order that added Steve Bannon to the National Security Council, he didn’t know what he was doing. Nope, not in the usual way of not knowing the consequences or not understanding the implications … not in that way. Trump literally did not know that the EO added Bannon to the National Security Council.

    Incompetent? Incurious? Stupid?

    […] Mr. Priebus bristles at the perception that he occupies a diminished perch in the West Wing pecking order compared with previous chiefs. But for the moment, Mr. Bannon remains the president’s dominant adviser, despite Mr. Trump’s anger that he was not fully briefed on details of the executive order he signed giving his chief strategist a seat on the National Security Council, a greater source of frustration to the president than the fallout from the travel ban. […]

    NY Times link

    More from the same article:

    […] Aides confer in the dark because they cannot figure out how to operate the light switches in the cabinet room. Visitors conclude their meetings and then wander around, testing doorknobs until finding one that leads to an exit. In a darkened, mostly empty West Wing, Mr. Trump’s provocative chief strategist, Stephen K. Bannon, finishes another 16-hour day planning new lines of attack.[…]

  80. says

    This is a followup to comments 8, 9, 24, 57, and 71.

    Kellyanne Conway claimed that her use of “massacre” in the phrase “Bowling Green massacre” was an “honest mistake,” that she had meant to say “terrorist.” Very convenient, since there was no Bowling Green massacre. It never happened.

    Now we learn that her claim of a “mistake,” indicating a slip of the tongue is also a lie. She has been using the Bowling Green massacre as a go-to lie for some time.

    http://www.cosmopolitan.com/politics/a8674035/kellyanne-conway-bowling-green-massacre-repeat/

    That’s right, Cosmpolitan has taken up the banner of resistance.

    […] In an earlier interview with Cosmopolitan.com, she not only used this same phrase but also went a step further in describing the actions of the two Iraqi men involved in the case to which she was referring. […]

    “He did, it’s a fact,” she said of Obama. “Why did he do that? He did that for exactly the same reasons. He did that because two Iraqi nationals came to this country, joined ISIS, traveled back to the Middle East to get trained and refine their terrorism skills, and come back here, and were the masterminds behind the Bowling Green massacre of taking innocent soldiers’ lives away.”

    Conway was referencing the case of two Iraqi men, Mohanad Shareef Hammadi and Waad Ramadan Alwan, who entered the U.S. under the guise of refugees in 2009 and were arrested in 2011 in Bowling Green, Kentucky, on charges related to terrorism. But when Cosmopolitan.com reached out to the FBI to verify details of Conway’s account, a spokesman wrote in an email that “a couple of your facts seem incorrect” and provided a link to a Justice Department press release, which, he said, “outlines all the public information and timeline.” […]

    Conway got just about everything wrong in her repetition of her “mistake.” The two guys in question did not travel back to the Middle East after they arrived in the USA.

    President Obama did not ban Iraqi refugees, but he did require that thousands of them be re screened and he temporarily extended and strengthened the visa application process.

    Yes, the guys in Bowling Green were bad dudes trying to send weapons to terrorists, but that doesn’t change the fact that Kellyanne Conway lied repeatedly.

  81. says

    […] much needed adjustment to Mr. Trump’s arrangement of the council is the removal of Mr. Bannon from the principals committee. Putting aside for a moment Mr. Bannon’s troubling public positions, which are worrisome enough, institutionalizing his attendance threatens to politicize national security decision making. […]

    That’s Admiral Michael Mullen writing in a New York Times op-ed. Mullen was Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff under President George W. Bush in 2007. He was re-nominated to the position by President Barack Obama in 2009. He served on the National Security Council. Not only did he say Steve Bannon should not be on the principal’s committee, he also said that the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the National Intelligence Director should be on that committee as permanent members.

  82. says

    From a segment on AM Joy, Trump’s insecurities are discussed.

    Excerpt:

    JOY REID (HOST): Which is true? Does Donald Trump seem to hate the media, or does he seem to sort of love and covet the media?

    ERIC BOEHLERT: He love/hates. A lot of his tweets are based on what he’s watching on cable television. He’s obsessed with this. He’s an incredibly insecure — he wallows in this kind of defining insecurity. And if you’re going to sit in the Oval Office, that’s not a good trait to have. So, he can’t take this criticism.

    The White House Correspondents Dinner, I kind of get the feeling like it’s the frog in the boiling water. The press doesn’t quite realize what’s going on here, and they should not be having this kind of Tony dinner. This is an administration that pushes back on the press.

    This is an administration that’s trying to destroy the fourth estate, and so Trump does it because he’s injured.

    He’s insulted, and so he lashes out. But it’s not just the attacks on the press. Virtually every initiative that he’s rolled out has been racked in lies to the press, the travel ban, the Yemen raid, the inauguration size, the size of the crowd.

    So this is a very dangerous combination, and the press needs to realize that we are in radical times. It’s not the time to kind of sit down and have some jokes at a correspondents dinner.

    The video is 2:35 long, and the first part includes the “Der Spiegel” cover in which Trump is seen decapitating Lady Liberty, and moves on to Howard Stern talking about what Trump actually thinks about the elites and the media (he craves their love and attention).

  83. says

    The VoteVets organization has had it with Trump’s failure to act like legitimate president. They are taking action, in part by producing ads that call Trump out.

    The largest progressive group of veterans in America, with over 500,000 supporters, VoteVets.org, is today releasing a blistering new television ad that takes on Donald Trump’s initial moves as President. The spot debuted on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” a show Trump reportedly watches daily, to get in front of his face. The group immediately announced plans to expand the buy to other shows and networks.

    The ad can be viewed here: YouTube link

    The ad was posted on Twitter, addressing Trump, here: Twitter link

    The television spot features an Afghanistan War Veteran who lost his leg in combat, doing weighted squats on his one leg, on a Smith machine in his garage. As he works out, he speaks in a voice-over:

    “President Trump. I hear you watch the morning shows. Here’s what I do every morning… Look, you lost the popular vote… You’re having trouble drawing a crowd… And your approval rating keeps sinking… But kicking thousands of my fellow veterans off their health insurance by killing the Affordable Care Act, and banning Muslims won’t help… And that’s not the America I sacrificed for…. You want to be a legitimate President, sir? Then act like one.”

    VoteVets Vice Chair and Navy Veteran Peter Kauffmann explained the placement of the ad by saying, “Since the White House comment line is down, and Donald Trump hasn’t set up that veterans hotline he promised, we’re going to go where we know Donald Trump is listening – Morning Joe, and the other shows that he obsesses over. He’s going to hear the message of this ad again and again. We’re officially putting Mr. Trump on notice.” […]

    VoteVets link

  84. says

    Trump confirms his view of reality: if he says it, it is true:

    […] O’REILLY: Is there any validity to the criticism of you that you say things you can’t back up factually, and as the president, if you say, for example, that there are 3 million illegal aliens who voted, and then you don’t have the data to back it up, some people are going to say, that’s irresponsible for a president to say that, is there any validity to it?

    TRUMP: Well, many people have come out and said I am right, you know that…. A lot of people have come out and said that I am correct. […]

    No. Reality doesn’t work that way. Facts don’t work that way. Trump can make up all kinds of folderol and some people will believe him. Still doesn’t make it true.

    O’Reilly finally managed to get Trump to back down, but just a tiny bit. As was noted up-thread, Trump is still having Pence head an investigation into voter fraud.

    […] TRUMP: Let me just tell you – let me just tell you, and it doesn’t have to do with the vote, although the end result. It has to due with the registration. And when you look at the registration and you see dead people that have voted, when you see people that are registered in two states, that have voted in two states, when you see other things, when you see illegals, people that are not citizens and they are on the registration roles. Look, Bill, we can be babies, but you take a look at the registration, you have illegals, you have dead people, you have this, it’s really a bad situation, it’s really bad. […]

    O’REILLY: Yes, but the data has to show that 3 million illegals voted.

    TRUMP: Look, forget that, forget all of that, just take a look at the registration and we’re going to do it. And I’m going to set up a commission to be headed by Vice President Mike Pence, and we’re going to look at it very, very carefully. […]

    There may well be problems with voter registration in the USA:
    – in some states, registering to vote is too difficult
    – we do not have a standardized, nationwide system
    – some states are slower than others to update records (hence the “dead people” on the roles who did not vote, and the people registered in more than one state but who voted in only one state)

    There is no evidence that dead people voted. Many of Trump’s White House aides are registered in more than one state, but that does not prove they voted more than once. There’s no evidence to support Trump’s claim that people “voted in two states.”

    Trump’s brain is in bizarre working mode.

    I doubt that Trump will drop his idea that 3 million “illegals” voted for Clinton in the long run. His concession to O’Reilly will be temporary.

  85. says

    OMFG. Sean Spicer said that nationwide protests against Trump are comprised of paid protestors.

    […] Interviewer: Do you sense instead of being an organic disruption, do you sense there is an organized pushback and people are being paid to protest?

    SPICER: Oh, absolutely. I mean, protesting has become a profession now. They have every right to do that, don’t get me wrong. But, I think that we need to call it what it is, it’s not these organic uprisings that we’ve seen through the last several decades. You know the Tea Party was a very organic movement. This has become a very paid astro-turf-type movement. […]

    Link

    FreedomWorks, supported by various rightwing billionaires, did pay Tea Party organizers and speakers, etc.

  86. says

    “President Trump is now speculating that the media is covering up terrorist attacks”:

    Speaking to the U.S. Central Command on Monday, President Trump went off his prepared remarks to make a truly stunning claim: The media was intentionally covering up reports of terrorist attacks.

    “You’ve seen what happened in Paris, and Nice. All over Europe, it’s happening,” he said to the assembled military leaders. “It’s gotten to a point where it’s not even being reported. And in many cases the very, very dishonest press doesn’t want to report it. They have their reasons, and you understand that.”…

  87. says

    Trump and his minions have still not figured out how to repeal and replace Obamacare, so they are doing what they can to weaken it, and to make Obamacare look bad.

    One of their first moves is to charge old people more for insurance. A lot of older people voted for Trump, so I guess they’re going to like this, right?

    […] 1. Insurers would have more leeway to vary prices by age, so that premiums for the oldest customers could be 3.49 times as large as those for younger customers. Today, premiums for the old can be only three times as high as premiums for the young, which is what the Affordable Care Act stipulates. According to sources privy to HHS discussions with insurers, officials would argue that since 3.49 “rounds down” to three, the change would still comply with the statute.

    2. People who want to apply for coverage mid-year, outside of open enrollment, would have to provide documentation of a qualifying life change ― such as a divorce or lost job ― before coverage begins. Presently, insurance kicks in for such people right away, as soon as they apply for it, subject to verification afterward.

    3. Insurers could cut off coverage for people who are more than 30 days late on premiums. Presently, lower- and middle-income consumers who qualify for the law’s tax credits get a 90-day grace period. […]

    Trump Administration May Use Executive Authority To Tweak Obamacare’s Rules

    Look at number 1 again, that’s the ploy to charge elders more for insurance. To me, the difference between paying $300 per month for insurance and paying $349 per month for insurance is significant. My income puts me in the lower middle class. $50 is a lot of money, especially if it has to be paid out every month.

  88. says

    This is a followup to comment 105.

    Yet another instance of Kellyanne Conway lying about Bowling Green has been found. In January, she called the non-event an “attack” instead of a “massacre.” Still wrong.

    […] During a brief video interview with TMZ on January 29, Conway referenced the event that did not happen. […]

    “[…] two Iraqis who came here, got radicalized, joined ISIS, and then were the masterminds behind the Bowling Green attack on our brave soldiers,” Conway said. […]

    Link

    Conway is now trying to slip out of the lies she told by saying, “The terrorists were in Bowling Green and their attack occurred in Iraq.”

    In direct response to Cosmopolitan, she said, “Frankly they were terrorists in Bowling Green but their massacre took place in Iraq. At least this got clear-thinking people to focus on what did happen in Bowling Green.”

    Yeah, that’s right, yay for Kellyanne Conway who drew attention to two arrests that took place in 2011. (/sarcasm) And, yeah, Kellyanne, mainstream media did cover the arrests. You do not need to call attention to the arrests now.

    There was no “massacre” in Bowling Green, as you said, Kellyanne, and then tried to deny having said. There was also no “attack.” Two doofus were caught trying to ship arms to the Middle East. They did not succeed. They are now in a federal penitentiary.

    President Obama’s administration took appropriate action. His actions are not equivalent to Trump banning immigration from seven Muslim-majority counties for no fucking logical reason.

  89. says

    Republican legislators in Arizona have proposed a very bad idea: they want to fine charities a thousand dollars per day for helping refugees:

    Unable to block the federal government from sending refugees to Arizona, six Republican lawmakers want to penalize the charities that help them resettle here.

    Sen. Judy Burges of Sun City West, who is leading the effort, told Capitol Media Services she wants to “have a discussion” about how refugees wind up in Arizona and what costs are incurred by the state. It specifically requires the Department of Economic Security to suspend its participation in the federally funded refugee resettlement program.

    […] The potentially more far-reaching part of her legislation would impose a fine on charities of $1,000 a day for each refugee it helps place in the state. And if a refugee is arrested, the charity would be financially liable for the cost of arrest, prosecution and incarceration of that person. […]

    Arizona Daily Sun link

    Some of the pushback:

    […] The measure concerns Ron Johnson who lobbies for Catholic Charities, one of the groups involved in helping refugees resettle in the state.”Obviously we’re all concerned with proper vetting and national security,” he said.

    “But that’s not something we do with Catholic Charities,” Johnson explained. “Once they’re here, we help them: find a job, find a place to live, learn the language, all kind of good things that help them be a part of society so they’re not dependent on the government.” […]

    “To punish the Good Samaritans that are trying to help them is a bit misplaced,” Johnson said. “These people are already here.” […]

  90. says

    If one of the only benefits of climate change is that people can no longer live in AZ and that asshole of a state gets broken up and it’s population disbursed to cooler climates, I say it’s worth it.

  91. says

    @118 – clearly I was being facetious, but AZ and their champion Joe Arpaio certainly love to lead the charge when it comes to civil rights violations and treating immigrants, minorities and women like shit. This is undeniable.

    My home state (NY), OTH, which of course has plenty wrong with it, at the very least has a governor, attorney general as well as several mayors and county executives who have defied Trump at every opportunity. So while you can engage in a battle of false equivalency if you wish, at the moment, I am rather proud of my state and the stance of it’s elected officials in the wake of the Trumputin tyrant’s ascendance to power.

  92. tomh says

    @ 119
    False equivalency? As far as I’m concerned, being proud of the state you happen to live in is equivalent to those who are proud that they happen to live in America. Separate states are irrelevant, there is nothing false about that, and nothing to be proud of either. State lines won’t absolve anyone from whatever is to come.

  93. says

    “13,000 people hanged in secret at Syrian prison, Amnesty says “:

    Thousands of people have been hanged at a Syrian prison in a secret crackdown on dissent by the regime of Bashar al-Assad, a report by Amnesty International has alleged.
    The human rights group says up to 13,000 people have been executed at Saydnaya prison north of the capital Damascus in a “hidden” campaign authorized by senior regime figures.

    Amnesty’s report, Human slaughterhouse, says prisoners are moved in the middle of the night from their cells under the pretext of being transferred. They are taken to the grounds of the prison, where they are hanged, likely unaware of their fate until they feel the noose around their neck, Amnesty alleges.

    The report is based on result of a year-long investigation, including interviews with 84 witnesses including security guards, detainees, judges and lawyers, Amnesty says.

    Most of those hanged were civilians “believed to be opposed to the government,” the report found….

  94. says

    SC @122, and Russia is backing Assad.

    In other news, Trump decided to lie during his remarks at MacDill Air Force Base in Tampa yesterday. He said:

    You’ve seen what happened in Paris and Nice. All over Europe it’s happening. It’s gotten to a point where it’s not even being reported. And in many cases, the very, very dishonest press doesn’t want to report it. They have their reasons and you understand that.

    Oddly, Trump started the lie with a reference to 9/11, Boston, Orlando, and San Bernardino. All of those attacks were covered extensively in the media. There was no cover-up.

    Now that Trump has spouted such a blatant lie in public, his White House team is attempting to clean up the mess. First, they changed “not even being reported” to “under reported,” and then they issued a list of underreported terrorist attacks.

    Sean Spicer issued a the list of 78 incidents.
    – attacks that received 24/7 coverage for days from a wide variety of media are on the list
    – attacks that are not examples of terrorism are on the list
    – incidents that resulted in zero casualties are on the list
    – spelling errors abound, including misspellings of the following words: attacker, San Bernardino, and Denmark
    – domestic attacks perpetrated by shoots in Colorado and Charleston were not on the list
    – attacks that caused mass casualties in sub-Saharan Africa were not on the list.

    On the bright side, the Bowling Green Massacre was not on the list.

    http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/trump-claims-media-don-t-cover-terrorist-attacks-archives-say-n717651

  95. says

    This is a followup to comment 85.

    Rachel Maddow noticed that strange reference to Belarus. Her segment analyzes the connection between the totally false Russian propaganda and General Flynn (and other National Security advisors in the White House). Her discussion was excellent.

    Russian propaganda from Sputnik is pushing the false narrative that Poland is preparing to invade Belarus. White House officials have made inquires about this fake news. They are asking the intelligence community to investigate. Nope. Poland is not invading Belarus.

    Russia is concerned about Belarus letting in some short-term visitors without a visa requirement, and Russia wants to push Belarus back into Russia’s arms. Let us hug you and control you, Belarus. Putin wants to hug you. Also, Putin wants to threaten your oil and gas supply (and perhaps your food supplies).

    Do General Flynn and other rightwing doofuses advising Trump want to help Putin threaten and cajole Belarus?

    The video is 16:06 long.

  96. says

    “Melania Trump reveals plan to leverage presidency to ink ‘multi-million dollar’ endorsement deals”:

    In a lawsuit filed today, First Lady Melania Trump revealed her intention to leverage the presidency to ink new “licensing, branding, and endorsement” deals worth many millions of dollars. In the filing, Melania Trump’s lawyer described the position of First Lady as a “once-in-a-lifetime” money making opportunity. She told the court she intended to pursue deals in “apparel, accessories, shoes, jewelry, cosmetics, hair care, skin care, and fragrance.”

    These kind of endorsement deals would be especially lucrative while Melania Trump is First Lady and thus “one of the most photographed women in the world.”…

  97. says

    SC @124, and Putin is demanding an apology from Bill O’Reilly for calling him a “killer.”

    In other news, Betsy Devos has been confirmed as Secretary of Education. She is an unqualified, ignorant, religion-centered doofus, but she is also a billionaire. V.P. Pence had to cast a tie-breaking vote to get her confirmed in the Senate. That’s a first for a cabinet nominee.

  98. says

    SC @126, she is thinking like her husband.

    In other news, one Republican congressman went out of his way to reveal his dunderheadedness by explaining the difference between white and Islamic terrorists.

    […] “There’s a difference,” Rep. Sean Duffy (R-WI) told CNN’s Alisyn Camerota, when she asked him why Trump hadn’t condemned the white supremacist who killed six Muslim congregants during prayer at a Canadian mosque on Jan. 29.

    “Again, death and murder on both sides is wrong, but if you want to take the dozens of scenarios where ISIS-inspired attacks have taken innocents, and you give one example of what was in Canada, I’m going to condemn them all,” Duffy said. “But again, you don’t have a group like ISIS or Al Qaeda that’s inspiring people around the world to take up arms and kill innocents. That was a one-off, that was a one-off, Alisyn. And you have a movement on the other side.”

    When Camerota brought up other examples of white people committing acts of terrorism—the Oklahoma City bombing and the Charleston shooting of black church-goers—Duffy was dismissive.

    “Oklahoma was, what, 20 years ago?” he said. “That’s different than this whole movement that has taken place through ISIS.”

    “It does matter,” he said later of the Charleston massacre. “Look at the good things that came from it. Nikki Haley took down the confederate flag, that was great!” […]

    Link

  99. says

    The Trump administration fielded a few more minions to defend thin-skinned Trump from criticism:

    Deputy Assistant to the President Sebastian Gorka said Monday that the administration would continue to label negative coverage about Donald Trump “fake news” until the media is weaned off its “monumental desire” to smear the President.

    “There is a monumental desire on behalf of the majority of the media, not just the pollsters, the majority of the media to attack a duly elected President in the second week of his term,” […]

    “That’s how unhealthy the situation is and until the media understands how wrong that attitude is, and how it hurts their credibility, we are going to continue to say, ‘fake news.’ I’m sorry, Michael. That’s the reality,” he added.

    Gorka recently joined the administration after stints as national security editor for Breitbart News and co-founder of consulting firm Threat Knowledge Group. […]

    Link

  100. says

    The Daily Show’s Trevor Noah made the point that Steve Bannon is the real president of the U.S.

    I didn’t like the focus on appearance in this segment (Bannon’s skin condition), but the jokes about “the great manipulator,” and Trump’s defensiveness (“I call my own shots!”) were good.

  101. says

    “But again, you don’t have a group like ISIS or Al Qaeda that’s inspiring people around the world to take up arms and kill innocents. That was a one-off, that was a one-off, Alisyn. And you have a movement on the other side.”

    Bullshit. The Kansas plotters, Roof, the shooter in Canada, the man who murdered Jo Cox, and many, many more are linked to the white supremacist, Islamophobic movement.

    “It does matter,” he said later of the Charleston massacre. “Look at the good things that came from it. Nikki Haley took down the confederate flag, that was great!” […]

    Fuck you, Duffy, and the party you rode in on.

  102. says

    Followup to comment 6.

    Sean Spicer described the raid in Yemen as “successful” on all levels, while also saying that it is hard to use the word “success” to describe a raid in which a Navy Seal died. Then Spicer continued to describe the “successful” raid.

    Now we are finding out that a guy who was targeted for death or capture, Qassim al-Rimi, escaped (or, perhaps the guy was not at that location). That guy is now taunting Trump via videos posted online.

    The details of the botched special forces raid in Yemen continue to trickle after the White House deemed the mission that resulted in the death of a Navy SEAL and multiple civilians “a successful operation by all standards.” On Monday, NBC News reported that the real mission of Trump’s first covert counterterrorism operation was to capture or kill Qassim al-Rimi, the head of al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula.

    The raid killed 14 al-Qaida operatives and, according to administration officials, yielded important intelligence, but it did not lead to the capture of al-Rimi, who is considered one of the most dangerous terrorists in the world. It is not known if al-Rimi was at the camp and managed to escape capture or whether he was possibly tipped off to the possible raid. In apparent response to the raid, over the weekend, al-Rimi released an audio recording that’s believed to be authentic taunting Donald Trump. “The White House’s new fool has received a painful blow at your hands in his first outing on your land,” he said in the recorded message to his followers.

    Link

  103. says

    Stephen Colbert is a Bowling Green Massacre Truther. Video available at the link.

    Excerpt:

    Just because it didn’t happen, doesn’t mean it wasn’t an inside job. If America isn’t going to be attacked, who is most likely not to do it? Us. That’s why I am a Bowling Green truther. I demand that the media not release the reports they did not do on the attack that did not occur.

    Theater of the Absurd.

  104. says

    SC @131, I agree. Those white supremacist killers were obviously linked to a movement.

    In other news, Trump’s stupidity is good news for China:

    […] Fearing that trade with the U.S. may be restricted by policies implemented by the Trump administration, Mexico has been looking to lessen its economic dependence on its big neighbor to the north. Chinese and Mexican officials met on Dec. 12, pledging to deepen ties between the two countries. […]

    But it is not just Mexico looking to strengthen economic ties with China. Other Latin American nations may give China a bigger economic beachhead in the Western Hemisphere. […]

    CNBC link

  105. says

    Schadenfreude moment: Trump’s pre-Super Bowl interview ratings were lower than President Obama’s pre-Super Bowl interview ratings in 2009.

    Trump’s interview drew an audience of 12.2 million viewers, and for Obama’s interview 21.9 million viewers tuned in.

    In 2016, Obama’s interview drew 14.9 million; in 2015, 15.4 million; in 2014, 18 million … and, to repeat, there’s the 21.9 million in 2009. The 2009 interview is the apples-to-apples comparison.

  106. says

    SC @137, Trump actually loves being a bully.

    In other news, people in the West Wing are really upset that Sean Spicer was lampooned by a woman. Not that he was lampooned, but that it was a woman that portrayed him. That makes me laugh … darkly.

    […] More than being lampooned as a press secretary who makes up facts, it was Spicer’s portrayal by a woman that was most problematic in the president’s eyes, according to sources close to him. And the unflattering send-up by a female comedian was not considered helpful for Spicer’s longevity in the grueling, high-profile job in which he has struggled to strike the right balance between representing an administration that considers the media the “opposition party,” and developing a functional relationship with the press.

    “Trump doesn’t like his people to look weak,” added a top Trump donor. […]

    Link

    I didn’t think Melissa McCarthy looked weak.

  107. says

    New video from Hillary Clinton.

    Excerpt:

    […] Just look at the amazing energy we saw last month as women organized a march that galvanized millions of people all over our country and across the world. We need strong women to step up and speak out. We need you to dare greatly and lead boldly. So please, set an example for every woman and girl out there who’s worried about what the future holds and wonders whether our rights opportunities and values will endure.

  108. says

    Thank you, Senator Al Franken. Your efforts failed, but thank you for fighting the good fight:

    […] I’d like to close by asking a few questions of my colleagues who are still considering a vote in her favor. If Mrs. DeVos’s performance didn’t convince you that she lacks the qualifications for this job, what would have to have happened in that hearing in order to convince you? If you can not bring yourself to vote against this nominee, is there anyone President Trump could nominate for any position that you could vote against?

    And if we cannot set party loyalty aside long enough to perform the essential duty of vetting the president’s nominees, what are we even doing here?

    Mr. President, the constitution gives us that power to reject cabinet nominations specifically so that we can prevent fundamentally ill-equipped nominees like Betsy DeVos from assuming positions of power for which they are not qualified. Let’s do our job.

    For the sake of our children, let’s do our job.

  109. microraptor says

    Students make swastikas in classroom, teacher punished for disciplining them. https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2017/01/27/ethical-dilemmas-trump-era/efPRjK8AOx1YZq8TlC9qFJ/story.html#comments

    The student made the swastika out of tape on a piece of paper and propped it against a recycling bin in a Stoughton High School classroom just before Thanksgiving.

    What happened next underscores the difficult terrain educators face as they confront the increase in racist and anti-Semitic incidents since the November election.

    Three teachers, frustrated by a lack of clear guidelines for dealing with such a sensitive issue, responded in sharply different ways. One talked about the swastika in class. Another spoke to a student about it. And a third withdrew a college recommendation for the student who created the swastika.

    But in the end, the teachers themselves, as well as some students, were disciplined.

  110. says

    microraptor @142. Sounds like we are dangerously close to normalizing swastikas.

    In other news, here is some background on Trump’s pick for Secretary of Agriculture, Sonny Perdue, former governor of Georgia:

    […] Perdue comes from Georgia, one of the country’s biggest timber states, at the heart of a region that cuts and sells more wood than any other on the planet—the “wood basket” of the world. A woodland owner himself, Perdue has questioned the link between extreme weather and climate change, has taken campaign funding from the timber industry and has been a booster of converting wood to ethanol, with potential climate consequences.

    That, conservationists say, could spell a worsening situation for the 193 million acres under the control of the U.S. Forest Service, which is within the Department of Agriculture. Those woodlands provide habitat for wildlife, purify drinking water for millions of people and absorb carbon dioxide, keeping it from warming the atmosphere. That gives the forests a critical role in addressing climate change. […]

    https://insideclimatenews.org/news/06022017/sonny-perdue-georgia-usda-agriculture-secretary-national-forest-service-climate-change

  111. says

    Yes, I think Republicans would like it if Russia had even more opportunities to hack an election in the U.S.

    Just months after an election plagued with foreign influence, a Republican-controlled House committee voted Tuesday to eliminate the independent, bipartisan agency tasked with helping states secure their voting systems.

    The Committee on House Administration voted 6–3, along party lines, to move forward with the Election Assistance Commission Termination Act, legislation that would eliminate the only agency responsible for making sure voting machines cannot be hacked.

    The Election Assistance Commission (EAC) was formed in the wake of the disastrous 2000 election to administer federal help to states to update and improve their voting systems. In recent years, the agency has worked to ensure that elections are accessible to those with disabilities, allocated funds for innovative election technology, and studied and reported election best practices, among other roles.

    Thomas Hicks, one of three commissioners currently on the EAC, told ThinkProgress that eliminating the agency would be “a huge mistake.”

    “It’s the only agency that deals with the administration of elections,” he said. “We touch 8,000 jurisdictions across the country, from voter registration to the counting of ballots… My read of the [termination] bill is that it just eliminates the agency but doesn’t move the responsibilities around.” […]

    Link

  112. says

    Sean Spicer lied during the White House Briefing … again. CNN corrected one of Spicer’s lies.

    […]

    Spicer [responded] to a report that CNN had declined an offer to interview Conway […] because of concerns about her credibility.

    “My understanding is they retracted that, they’ve walked that back or denied it, however you want to put it, I don’t care,” Spicer said […]. “But I think Kellyanne is a very trusted aide of the president and I think … any characterization otherwise is insulting.” […]

    About 10 minutes later, CNN’s communications arm released a statement saying that Spicer was wrong.

    “CNN was clear, on the record, about our concerns about Kellyanne Conway’s credibility to the New York Times and others. We have not ‘retracted’ or ‘walked back’ those comments,” the statement said. “Those are the facts.” […]

    Link

  113. says

    Another liar for the Trump administration, Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly, claimed there was “no chaos” at U.S. airports after Trump’s travel ban.

    […] At the hearing before the House Homeland Security Committee on Tuesday, Kelly faced questions about the rollout from Rep. Nanette Barragán (D-Calif.), who said she had visited Los Angeles International Airport the night after the ban took effect.

    “I went down to LAX on Saturday night and there was chaos,” she said. […]

    “When I called CBP [Customs and Border Protection] asking for a briefing, just to find out if any of my constituents were being held, given access to an attorney, I was told call a 202 Washington number,” she said. “And then I was hung up on. How are we to know that there was no chaos down there? Members of Congress couldn’t even see for themselves.”

    Kelly didn’t back down, however.

    “Well, you can take my word for it,” he said. Kelly added that CBP personnel said “they were doing their normal job at the counters” and that most people were allowed to pass, with some pulled aside for additional screening.

    “This is normal everyday operations in any airport in the United States,” Kelly said. “There was no chaos.”

    Link

    No, I don’t think I will be taking your word for it.

  114. says

    Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, took to Twitter to thank Donald Trump for revealing the true perfidy of the USA. Actually, Trump has only revealed the ignorance and authoritarianism of himself and his minions, but Iran will profit from that.

    Kahamenei’s tweets:

    We appreciate Trump! Because he largely did the job for us in revealing true face of America.

    What we’ve been saying in thirty some years – of corruption in US government – #Trump has outspokenly said during his campaign & in office.

    Now #Trump with actions like handcuffing a 5-year-old kid, shows what the truth of US is & what American human rights means! #MuslimBan

    #Trump says be scared of me! No, Iranians will respond to such words with Feb. 10 rallies & will show what is their position toward threats.

  115. says

    Wonkette discussed a new bill signed by Putin today. The bill allows Russians to beat their wives once a year.

    In Russia, according to their own government statistics, approximately 36,000 women are beaten by their husbands every day — and Vladmir Putin and the Russian Parliament think that number could be a little higher if they try real hard! Thus, on Tuesday, Putin signed a bill that will decriminalize domestic violence so long as it only happens every once in a while. The bill already passed the Russian Parliament with vehement support — 380-3.

    Dubbed a “slapping law,” the bill will decriminalize domestic violence incidents, provided they don’t occur more than once in a 12-month period and don’t result in serious injury. […]

    The fact that Putin signed this is hardly surprising. Back when the bill was first being discussed, he noted that “We should not go overboard with it (punishment for battery). It’s not good, it harms families.” Also, you know, he’s terrible.

    One of the sponsors of the bill is conservative senator Yelena Mizulina, also known for writing up that charming little ban on “gay propaganda.” It’s seen, largely, as part of a return to “traditional family values” based on the teachings of the Russian Orthodox Church and the “Domostroi” (domestic order) — a 16th century book prescribing household rules, that was at least partially written by an advisor to Ivan the Terrible. So, you know — who would not want a return to those times, huh? […]

    The Domostroi includes many nuggets of wisdom, like “A wife which is good, laborious, and silent is a crown to her husband,” “If he beats you it means he loves you,” […]

    In other words, it is super fucked up! But also it’s traditional, so let’s go back to that, huh? […]

  116. microraptor says

    Kreator @149:

    Is Jill a real liberal or does she just pretend to be one so she has more opportunities to backstab them?

  117. logicalcat says

    Jill Steins embarasing defense of the alt- medicine bullshit has irrepairably damaged the green part’s credibility. As a former supporter of hers this is the main reason why I switched to Clinton. Honestly, what has she ever accomplished? Other than making teh greenparty a laughing stock. I am honestly curious. Maybe there is something redemable in her past or something, but as of right now she is all talk and no action. Nothing of actual use anyways. Her bringing up wifi brain developement either shows me that she is too fucking stupid to lead the green party, or she cares more about catering to her voter base than to make a viable progressive party. But of course when Hillary panders to voters its a bad thing…

  118. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    I don’t consider the Greens a serious political party. They are in a position where they need to do some advertising during the elections to make their platform and candidates known. I know they prefer “purity” in fundraising and operate on a shoestring, but it doesn’t cost that much (bulk mail) for a card to all the households saying “We are the Greens, this is ten of our positions on the issues, and these are candidates on the ballot in your area”. Repeat weekly, but change the issues being addressed. Then, I might begin to consider them as a serious party. But if I don’t know they are even running a candidate in my congressional district until I see the ballot, it is too late at the point to even consider them.

  119. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    Donald Trump is exciting a group he wants to do away with. ISIS. They see a chance of reviving their fortunes, as Trump fails to see that he is actually doing what they want with his rhetoric, making it Islam vs. Xianity.

    President Donald Trump has set out to crush Islamic State when it is already at a low ebb, but Islamists and some analysts say his actions could strengthen the ultra-hardline group by creating new recruits and inspiring attacks on U.S. soil.
    IS has been weakened in recent months by battlefield defeats, the loss of territory in Iraq, Syria and Libya, and a decline in its finances and the size of its fighting forces.
    Trump’s pledge to eradicate “Islamic extremism” looks at first sight to be yet another blow to Islamic State’s chances of success.
    But Middle East experts and IS supporters say his election triumph could help revive the group’s fortunes. They also believe his move late last month to temporarily ban refugees and bar nationals from seven mainly Muslim countries could work in the group’s favor.

    Both Obama and Clinton were aware of that overt trap, and avoided it.
    Donald Trump, tool of ISIS. Of course, he would fail to see the irony, and change his rhetoric.

  120. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    *PSA*
    Trump has made a big deal about the violence in Chicago. MSNBS’s Chris Hayes will be holding a Town Hall meeting from Chicago, Thursday night at 8 pm ET on MSNBC. The mayor and governor are united in it is OK to send in Federal Marshalls, FBI, or ATF agents, but no National Guard is acceptable.
    */PSA*

  121. says

    Oh, Kellyanne, Kellyanne. This is taking “focus on the positive” a step too far.

    Kellyanne Conway was interview by CNN’s Jake Tapper. She came up with a new defense of Trump.

    “How about the President’s statements that are false?” Tapper asked at one point. “I’m talking about the President of the United States saying things that are not true, demonstrably not true. That is important.”

    “Are they more important than the many things that he says that are true that are making a difference in people’s lives?” Conway asked in response.

    One of Kellyanne’s previous tactics was to tell us to focus less on what Trump says, and to “look at what’s in his heart.”

    None of this deflection is going to work. We have a president who thinks of facts as his enemies. Trump can’t govern in any reasonable way.

  122. says

    Trump is lying about the murder rate in the U.S.A. … again. He did that repeatedly during the campaign, and now he has refreshed the lie.

    Steve Benen says there is a reason Trump continues to lie about the murder rate.

    […] the murder rate is roughly at a 50-year low, not a 45-year high.

    And yet, as the Washington Post reported, the president just can’t help himself. It’s almost as if this lie is some kind of nervous tic Trump can’t control.

    President Trump met Tuesday morning with a group of sheriffs from the National Sheriffs Association, a group that consists of more than 3,000 sheriffs from around the country. And to this sworn group of law enforcement veterans, with reporters taking notes, he again repeated a falsehood about the murder rate in America.

    Trump told the sheriffs, “the murder rate in our country is the highest it’s been in 47 years.” He blamed the news media for not publicizing this development, then added, “But the murder rate is the highest it’s been in, I guess, 45 to 47 years. […] I’d say that in a speech [during the campaign] and everybody was surprised.”

    We were surprised because it’s not true. In terms of the evidence, Trump has this exactly backwards. The president who boasted the other day about his skills as a leader who calls his own shots, “largely based on an accumulation of data,” seems incapable of understanding basic and straightforward crime figures.

    Kellyanne Conway, asked to explain her boss’ repeated lies on the matter, said yesterday, “I don’t know who gave him that data.”

    […] The larger significance has to do with why he’s so fond of this specific falsehood.

    For Trump, the potency of fear has become more than a campaign tool; it’s now a governing mechanism. Note, for example, that the day before he lied about the murder rate, the president also lied about a media conspiracy to hide information from the public about terrorist attacks. […]

    He wants a Muslim ban, so we must be afraid at all times of terrorism. He wants a border wall, so he urges us to fear illegal immigration. He wants expanded new police powers, so he insists we believe his interpretation of crime data, even if it’s the opposite of the truth. […]

    “If he frightens people, it puts him in the driver’s seat. He’s in control,” historian Robert Dallek told the Post. “These are what I think can be described as demagogic tendencies.”

  123. says

    Trump is still dissing judges. Also, I don’t think he understands how “respect” works.

    […] “It is really incredible to me that we have a court case that is going on so long,” Trump said of the appeal process, before reading a paragraph of the law under which lawyers argued for his authority to suspend immigration from seven Muslim-majority countries. “A bad high school student would understand this,” he later said of the law’s wording.

    Later, Trump addressed the three judges on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals hearing the case, though the President refrained from criticizing them directly.

    “I listened to a panel of judges and I’ll comment on that — I will not comment on the statements made by certainly one judge, but I have to be honest that if these judges wanted to, in my opinion, help the court in terms of respect for the court, they’d do what they should be doing,” he said.

    Later, he returned to the court, seemingly trying to restrain himself.

    “And I don’t ever want to call a court biased so I won’t call it biased, and we haven’t had a decision yet. But courts seem to be so political and it would be so great for our justice system if they would be able to read a statement and do what’s right,” he said. “And that has to do with the security of our country, which is so important. Right now we are at risk because of what happened.” […]

    Link

    Trump was speaking today at a meeting that included members of the Major County Sheriffs’ Association and Major Cities Chiefs Association .

    The judges would earn Trump’s “respect” if they ruled in his favor.

  124. says

    Since Mitch McConnell silenced Elizabeth Warren on the floor of the Senate, several Democrats have read Coretta Scott King’s letter into the record, or have quoted extensively from that letter as part of their effort to show that Jeff Sessions is not fit to be Attorney General.

    […] Sen. Merkely took the floor and quoted from the letter at length. Though the floor was largely empty, there is always a member of the majority party — the Republicans — presiding. […]

    He spoke for about 13 minutes, going over the context of the letter and the history of the suppression of black votes, including specifically quoting from the section McConnell objected to.

    “Then she proceeds to address that there were occasions where individuals with legal authority chose to initiate cases specifically against African Americans while ignoring allegations of similar behavior by whites, choosing instead to chill — and now I’m quoting again — choosing instead ‘to chill the exercise of the franchise’ by blacks through misguided investigation,” Merkely said.

    Merkley, notably, does not say that the specific misguided investigation King was referring to was spearheaded by Sessions. In his reading, however, he extensively quotes the letter that McConnell censured Warren for reading, and concludes it with this quote of King’s: “I do not believe Jefferson Sessions possesses the requisite judgement, competence, and sensitivity to the rights guaranteed by the federal civil rights laws to qualify for appointment to the Federal district court.”

    Before Merkley yielded the floor, Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) pointed out that the letter had been addressed to the Senate 30 years ago, and that its contents had therefore been known to the Senate for 30 years. He also questioned whether the letter, as such, was a matter of Senate Record — and therefore whether Warren had been censured for reading something that was a matter of record. […]

    After McConnell’s censure of Warren, the letter’s contents have been widely published.

    While Merkley may have succeeded in reading a large portion of the letter on the floor where Warren was silenced, Warren too read the letter in its entirety: standing right outside the floor, in a viral video she posted to Facebook.

    Wednesday morning, another Democrat senator — Tom Udall of New Mexico — read King’s letter on the Senate floor.

    Link

    I think that Bernie Sanders has also read the letter on the Senate Floor. This could go on for some time.

    Mitch McConnell succeeded in drawing attention to Coretta Scott King’s letter.

  125. says

    So, yeah, Nordstrom dropped Ivanka Trump’s label because the merchandise was not selling well.

    Trump had something to say about that:

    My daughter Ivanka has been treated so unfairly by @Nordstrom. She is a great person — always pushing me to do the right thing! Terrible!

  126. Alex the Pretty Good says

    About those “78 underreported terrorists attacks”

    Belgian newspaper editor responds with an open letter Dear Mr. President, your list of 78 ‘not covered’ attacks is ‘fake news’ (Dutch intro, Letter in English)

    […] We are a small Belgian news source. In neither size nor importance do we come anywhere close to – let’s say – the “failing New York Times”, but I can assure you that both we and the global press covered all of the attacks you listed. If we missed or “underreported” any of the events, it is only because the lack of casualties rendered the news value lower than the return on investment of a Trump seaside property.
    […]
    PS: please fire the intern that made the ‘offical’ document. It is riddled with spelling and factual errors. We know you dislike Brussels – you once called it a “Hellhole” – but it can’t be that hard to google its neighbouring city Charleroi and know it is not spelled ‘Chaleroi’.

  127. says

    Trump is facing even more lawsuits over an executive order. This time it is not the immigration ban, the lawsuit is to block the executive order that requires federal agencies to repeal two regulations for every new one they enact.

    […] Public Citizen, the Natural Resources Defense Council and the Communications Workers of America filed suit Wednesday morning […], claiming that Trump exceeded his constitutional authority in issuing the order.

    The complaint also alleges that the president’s directive violates the Administrative Procedure Act by instructing agencies to act arbitrarily in canceling regulations in order to promulgate new ones.

    “No one thinking sensibly about how to set rules for health, safety, the environment and the economy would ever adopt the Trump Executive Order approach — unless their only goal was to confer enormous benefits on big business,” Public Citizen President Robert Weissman said in a statement. “ By irrationally directing agencies to consider costs but not benefits of new rules, it would fundamentally change our government’s role from one of protecting the public to protecting corporate profits.” […]

    Among the order’s specific provisions targeted in the new case is Trump’s demand that new regulatory efforts in the current fiscal year have a net cost of zero, “unless otherwise required by law or consistent with advice provided in writing by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget.”

    “No governing statute authorizes an agency to base its actions on a decisionmaking criterion of zero net cost across multiple regulations,” the suit says. […]

    Link

    I know it is not possible, but I wish we could file an all-purpose lawsuit against stupidity in Trump’s executive orders.

  128. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    Trump isn’t the only one with a problem overstepping his bounds. When the democrat squeaked out a victory in the North Carolina gubernatorial race, the rethug controlled legislature decided to limit his powers. A 3-judge put that law on hold.

    A North Carolina court temporarily blocked a new state law on Wednesday that stripped the new Democratic governor of some of his powers.
    The law, passed by the GOP-controlled legislature, required Senate confirmation for the governor’s Cabinet members, which previous governors have not needed. The law was approved in December, two weeks before Roy Cooper took over. It was criticized by Democrats who called it a partisan effort to undermine the new governor’s authority.
    A three-judge panel released its decision Wednesday as state senators were scheduled to question Cooper’s pick to lead the veterans’ affairs department.
    Cooper appointed eight of his 10 Cabinet members before the legislature came into session in January and they were sworn in. Cooper said they are the Cabinet heads and are working at their jobs.
    The legislature called them acting heads and said that under the law they passed, they can be dismissed if the Senate does not confirm them.
    Legislative leaders lashed out at the three judges, calling their decision “a blatant overstep of their constitutional authority.”

    Ah, rethugs, ever stop to think you overstepped your limited authority, and created an unconstitutional law? Grow up. You don’t always win, and shouldn’t with your attitude.

  129. says

    Nerd @164, thanks for that update. At least we have a temporary halt to unconstitutional actions by Republican legislators in North Carolina.

    In other news, Vox is struggling when it comes to setting editorial guidelines for what to call Trump’s Muslim ban:

    […] Democrats and progressives call it a “Muslim ban,” to call attention to the policy’s roots in Trump’s Islamophobic campaign and to make the case that it’s unconstitutional discrimination. The White House goes back and forth over whether to call it a “ban” at all — it prefers the phrase “extreme vetting.” Most press outlets, trying to split the difference, call it a “travel ban.”

    At Vox, we’re still struggling with which term to use. Not only are none of these terms technically accurate, but they all run the risk of being actively misleading. […]

    the case for calling Trump’s order a “Muslim ban” is pretty straightforward: It’s based on intention. In 2015, Donald Trump called for a “total and complete shutdown” of Muslim immigration to the United States. The proposal morphed over the course of 2016 into a more legally defensible country-based ban. If the “country-based” stuff is really a fig leaf, the argument goes, then the public shouldn’t let the Trump administration get away with it.

    […] If the ban exempts Christians from certain countries, but affects their Muslim neighbors, that could create de facto discrimination.

    The case against using it [against using “Muslim Ban”]: Ironically, it’s not actually clear that the order would end up, in practice, being quite as discriminatory as people fear […]

    The order exempts “religious minorities” from the ban on refugees but not from the ban on all entries from Iraq, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, or Yemen. And during the time the ban was in effect, evidence suggests that Christians from those countries were in fact banned along with Muslims — despite what Trump implied.

    […] during the week that the ban was in effect, Customs and Border Protection officials rejected some of the very same “Middle Eastern Christians” that President Trump promised to help […] but no Christian refugees from banned countries were allowed. […]

    Calling Trump’s executive order a “travel ban” implies that it only stops people from taking trips — but that doesn’t even begin to cover it. It is designed to stop people who were planning to come live in the US from doing so. […]

    The phrase “travel ban” has the virtue of sounding neutral. It uses the term “ban,” which the White House occasionally rejects, but it does so in service of the argument that the policy serves only to stop people from visiting the US for the purpose of terrorist attacks.

    This is wildly misleading, and it minimizes the disruption the order has caused. […]

    “Immigration ban” […] It makes clear what “travel ban” doesn’t — that would-be immigrants are being prevented from coming to the US.

    The case against using it: Most immigrants from around the world aren’t being prevented from coming to the US, and many of the people affected by the ban are people on non-immigrant visas (which includes not only tourists and business visitors but also most people on work visas). […]

    It might count as “extreme vetting” for people from permitted countries, but for people from blacklisted countries, it will still be a ban.

    Link

    This argument over semantics highlights how truly confusing the executive order is, and how the Trump administration does not know what it is doing. Nobody can figure this stuff out. The executive order is garbage that pretends to be an extreme vetting order.

  130. says

    Oh, my. Leaked info from the White House bolsters the rumor that Trump, confused about which was better for the economy, a strong dollar or a weak dollar, called Mike Flynn at 3 a.m. to ask for advice. Flynn did not know the answer.

    Poltiico’s Michael Crowley joked that we’ve gone from worrying about President Trump fielding a scary 3 a.m. phone call to considering a president placing a scary 3 a.m. phone call.

    Yeah, Trump should have known the answer, and failing that, he should have known that Flynn was not the right man to coach him on monetary policy.

    Steve Benen discussed the alarmingly leaky White House:

    […] Members of the Republican’s team started sharing embarrassing insights literally within the first couple of days after Trump’s inauguration. […] this has continued, more or less non-stop. […]

    A Washington Post piece last week, which characterized the White House leaks as “totally bananas,” raised the possibility that “there are people at senior levels within the administration who have major concerns about Trump and his fitness for office. In the long tradition of whistleblowers, they [may be] using selective leaks to make sure that people know what is really going on inside the White House.”

    I’m not in a position to know the leakers’ motivation – though if aides fear Trump’s unfit after four weeks, that’s something the country needs to talk about – but it’s safe to say there’s no modern precedent for a White House dishing quite this much, this early, in ways that make the sitting president sound like a buffoon.

    Postscript: In case anyone’s curious, the benefits of a strong vs. weak dollar depend on circumstances and policy goals. As Kevin Drum noted, a weak dollar “is good for boosting exports and reducing the trade deficit, so that’s probably what Trump was looking for.”

    Another resource: http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2017/02/trumps-staff-sure-seems-eager-tell-world-hes-imbecile

  131. says

    Trump has been president for, what, twenty days? He has already lost us an ally in the fight against extremists. Yemen is not happy.

    […] Angry at the civilian casualties incurred last month in the first commando raid authorized by President Trump, Yemen has withdrawn permission for the United States to run Special Operations ground missions against suspected terrorist groups in the country, according to American officials. […]

    NY Times link

    Trump and his deluded minions continue to insist that the raid in Yemen was a “success.”

  132. says

    Followup to comment 160.

    What Mitch McConnell said about silencing Elizabeth Warren:

    She was warned. She was given an explanation. Nevertheless, she persisted.

    What Hillary Clinton said:

    She was warned. She was given an explanation. Nevertheless, she persisted. So must we all.

  133. says

    Trump held a meeting to discuss healthcare for veterans … but he didn’t invite any veterans.

    White House officials held their first listening session on problems with the Department of Veterans Affairs on Tuesday, but without inviting prominent members of the veterans community to the event.

    Officials from the American Legion, Disabled American Veterans and the Veterans of Foreign Wars said they were not invited to the morning event and did not know about it until it was announced late Monday night, as part of the White House’s routine schedule outline.

    Other prominent veterans groups were surprised Tuesday morning by news of the event, and unsure who was invited to take part in the discussion. […]

    http://www.militarytimes.com/articles/trump-va-listening-session-no-advocates

  134. blf says

    Speaking of Yeman, today (8-Feb), Yemen: UN and partners appeal for $2.1 bln to provide life-saving assistance to 12 million people in 2017:

    The United Nations and humanitarian partners today launched an international appeal for US$2.1 billion to provide life-saving assistance to 12 million people in Yemen in 2017. […]

    […]
    Since March 2015, violent conflict and disregard by all parties to the conflict for their responsibility to protect civilians have created a vast protection crisis in Yemen and millions of people face threats to their safety and basic human rights every day. Deliberate war tactics are accelerating the collapse of key institutions and the economy, thereby exacerbating pre-existing vulnerabilities. This has left an alarming 18.8 million people — more than two thirds of the population — in need of humanitarian assistance.

    An estimated 10.3 million people are acutely affected and need some form of immediate humanitarian assistance to save and sustain their lives including food, health and medical services, clean water & sanitation and protection. Nearly 3.3 million people — including 2.1 million children — are acutely malnourished while 2 million people remain internally displaced.
    […]

    Also Yemen famine feared as starving children fight for lives in hospital (trigger warning: very disturbing pictures of starving children): “Civil war has created ‘very severe needs’, the UN warns, while a blockade aimed at hurting Houthi rebels has made the situation worse” (Oct-2016).

  135. says

    On January 28, Trump called French President Francois Hollande. We now have a few details that illustrate how badly that call went:

    […] President Donald Trump spent much of a recent phone call with French President Francois Hollande veering off into rants about the U.S. getting shaken down by other countries, according to a senior official with knowledge of the call, creating an awkward interaction with a critical U.S. ally.

    While the Hollande call on Jan. 28 did touch on pressing matters between the two countries — namely the fight against the Islamic State — Trump also used the exchange to vent about his personal fixations, including his belief that the United States is being taken advantage of by China and by international bodies like NATO, the official said.

    At one point, Trump declared that the French can continue protecting NATO, but that the U.S. “wants our money back,” the official said, adding that Trump seemed to be “obsessing over money.”

    “It was a difficult conversation, because he talks like he’s speaking publicly,” the official said. “It’s not the usual way heads of state speak to each other. He speaks with slogans and the conversation was not completely organized.” […]

    Politico link

    And here is the spin on that conversation, from a statement released by the White House:

    President Trump reaffirmed the U.S. commitment to NATO and noted the importance of all NATO Allies sharing the burden on defense spending. The leaders also lauded our combined efforts to eliminate ISIS in Iraq and Syria.

  136. blf says

    me @172: Yeman → Yemen.

    erikthebassist@170, Citing faux is always iffy, independent confirmation from a reliable source is strongly advised!

  137. says

    Followup to SC @26, and to comment 161.

    Sean Spicer weighed in on the Nordstrom kerfuffle today during his daily press briefing at the White House.

    I think this is less about his family’s business and an attack on his daughter. He ran for president. He won. He’s leading this country. I think for people to take out their concern about his actions or his executive orders on members of his family, he has every right to stand up for his family and applaud their business activities, their success.

    There’s a targeting of her brand and it’s her name. She’s not directly running the company. It’s still her name on it. There are clearly efforts to undermine that name based on her father’s positions on particular policies that he’s taken. This is a direct attack on his policies and her name. Her because she is being maligned because they have a problem with his policies.

    Nordstrom was attacking the president’s policies! Really? Trump and Sean Spicer think that? Aiyiyiyi.

    Satire fails me. I don’t even know what to say. Holy crap.

  138. says

    Thanks for the input up-thread regarding the statement (or not) from Yemen. I think I’ll wait to see what develops. We’ll probably get a clearer picture of what did and what did not happen soon.

    In other news, a meeting Trump held with Intel CEO Brian Krzanich turned into a product announcement.

    […] The White House announced Trump’s meeting with Krzanich in a last-minute update to its daily schedule sent to reporters about an hour before the meeting took place. […]

    He said that Krzanich had a “very big announcement” and invited him to speak.

    “Brian, why don’t you say a few words and maybe also talk about the product you’re going to be making?” Trump said. “It’s amazing.”

    “It’s an honor to be here today representing Intel and to be able to announce our $7 billion investment in our newest most advanced factory, Fab 42, in Chandler, Arizona,” Krzanich said.

    The executive said the factory will produce 7-nanometer semiconductor chips and create about 3,000 direct jobs, with over 10,000 more created in support of the factory.

    “Thank you, Brian,” Trump said. “We have something over there that will show a little bit about the new product.”

    “This is one of our newest 10-nanometer silicon wafers,” Krzanich said, holding an apparent example of the kind of product he said the factory will produce.

    “Do you have any questions for Brian? I know you have none for me, so how about Brian?” Trump said.

    “Do you plan to bring back jobs?” a reporter asked. “The other business you have outside the country, do you plan on bringing them back here?”

    “This is actually expansion. This is about growth,” Krzanich said.

    He did not answer whether or not the factory will fulfill Trump’s campaign promise to “bring back” jobs to the United States.

    “Great thing for Arizona,” Trump interrupted. “Unbelievable company and product, and we’re very happy, and I can tell you the people of Arizona are very happy.” […]

    Talking Points Memo link

  139. says

    Writing for The New Yorker, Alexandra Schwartz, captured the importance of Melissa McCarhty’s impersonation of Sean Spicer:

    […] The casting of McCarthy as Spicer was a stroke of comedic brilliance, a perfect fit. She got the mannerisms down pat: the pugnacious fighter’s scowl, the verbal gaffes and nonsensical spin tactics, the scorn sprayed indiscriminately at the press corps (a metaphor made literal by the inspired use of a Super Soaker loaded, supposedly, with soapy water), and, most of all, the flicker of fear behind the fury, that mark of the schoolyard bully who knows he’s going to be whupped himself as soon as he gets home. The sketch has now been viewed upward of sixteen million times on YouTube. In a reaction uncommon to this Administration, Spicer initially responded to its popularity with sanguine good humor, joking that McCarthy should take it easy on the gum.

    That, however, was on Monday morning. By evening, Politico had reported that the President was displeased with the portrayal, and offended in particular that a woman had been called on to do the portraying. The article quotes an anonymous Trump donor as saying that the President “doesn’t like his people to look weak.” It’s impossible to be surprised by this morsel of news, merely the latest expression of Trump’s mundane, antediluvian misogyny. I find myself actually delighted by it. Getting under the President’s thin skin was already easy. Now all it takes, apparently, is something as basic as gender-switched casting, a commonplace of high-school theatre productions across the country. (Reader, I speak from much experience.) […]

    The entire article is worth reading.

  140. says

    blf @174 – It’s widely reported elsewhere, NYT, Chicago Tribune to name a couple. That just happened to be the first link in my Google News feed. I didn’t really pay attention when I copy pasted it. I’m at work and was in a hurry. I agree that anything Faux news says should be taken with a grain of salt but the words did apparently originate from the Yemeni Foreign Minister.

  141. blf says

    Re Intel’s 10 nm @176: A “fab” is not a product per se, but a chip factory. On the other hand, 10 nm scale chips are the leading edge of commercial production, although Intel is not the only fabricator at that scale (my memory says Sumsung is also). More to the point, the jobs in or immediately associated with fabs are not, for the most part, the sort a redundant coal miner or steelworker or farmer or so on would necessarily easily fit into, and the fabs themselves are highly automated.

    And $7bn factories do not spring up overnight. The new fab would have been in the planning and design stages for years, not to mention a technical process known as “qualification”. Hair furor trum-prat is claiming credit for something that was decided-on and invested-in years ago.

    There is also a considerable amount of engineering and science in both the fabs and the chips the fabs produce. This is often collaborative with both universities and other companies, and is not restricted / confined to the States. All of that is something it seems hair furor and his dalekocracy simply do not comprehend.

  142. blf says

    About a year ago (April-2016) there was a snarking in the Grauniad, Donald Trump has the manner of an arrogant televangelist suspected of murder by Columbo, with some classic zingers like “Trump seems to have the emotional range of a Power Rangers villain and the social skills of a teenage Minotaur. He looks like a pumpkin having a nervous breakdown, talks like the words are being fired out of his mouth by a tennis ball launcher and has the general manner of an arrogant televangelist suspected of murder by Columbo. His approach to public speaking? ‘If in doubt, switch to your internal monologue.’ His core demographic? Possibly men whose holiday destinations would significantly overlap with a list of missing women. […]”

    The author of that snark has a new one, Donald Trump: a man so obnoxious that karma may see him reincarnated as himself:

    All presidents come into office with something to prove, it’s just rarely their sanity. […]

    America has gone from the Obama Years to the Trump Years, like going from the West Wing to a sitcom where the incidental music involves a tuba. I actually think Donald Trump is going to prove a lot of people wrong, but sadly not George Orwell, Margaret Atwood, or whoever wrote the Book of Revelation. […]

    You look into Trump’s eyes and you see the fear and confusion of a man who has just been told he’s got stage-four cervical cancer. He is a super-villain in a world without heroes, a man so obnoxious and unhappy that karma may see him reincarnated as himself. You kind of wish he’d get therapy, but at this stage it’s like hiring a window cleaner for a burning building. It’s still difficult to classify him exactly: he’s not a classic Nazi, but would burn books if his supporters knew how to read. Hillary Clinton was obviously the preferred establishment candidate, and whoever was on the rota for this election cycle at the Illuminati really dropped the ball, but Trump is still very much someone that the permanent powers have assessed they can work with.

    One of his first acts as president was an executive order to ban federal money going to international groups that perform or provide information on abortions. Making it clear that he’ll only provide billion-dollar funding to terminate young lives overseas if some kind of US-made drone is involved. […] There’s probably business pressure behind this bill, too. Maybe American corporations are worried that fewer kids in the developing world means no one to do the detailed stitching on their clothing lines. I suppose everybody’s politics are shaped by the particular bubble they live in. Trump sees anti-choice arguments all the time; the only time he sees an argument for abortion is in a mirror.

    […] He will blame [the judicary] for the next act of terrorism that occurs then declare a state of emergency where everybody has to stay indoors while his tweets are read out over a Tannoy. […]

    […]

    My best guess at the great man’s next move is the hoisting of an enormous burning eye above Trump Tower. It’s a building for which the words tacky and gaudy somehow seem too jolly and frivolous. Close up, it looks like the memory stick where some giant alien sex-killer stores his worst atrocities, or a version of the black slab in 2001: A Space Odyssey, sent to restore our consciousness to the level of chimpanzees. […]

    […]

    During the campaign, Trump said he wanted to stop America from making foreign military interventions, possibly because he realised he would need the army for suppressing the domestic population. […]

    […]

  143. says

    blf @180:

    And $7bn factories do not spring up overnight.

    Right. I was thinking along the same lines. Trump is trying to take credit for, or at least to associate himself with, corporate expansion that did not depend on him. I still think it was kind of strange for Trump to invite the Intel CEO to make his announcement in the White House.

    In other strange announcements, Sean Spicer said:

    I can only hope that if Coretta Scott King was still with us, that she would support Senator Sessions’s nomination.

  144. blf says

    Proposed Trump executive order would allow US firms to sell ‘conflict minerals’:

    Draft executive order proposes suspension of portion of Dodd-Frank reforms designed to prevent US from selling minerals that are fuelling violence in Congo

    The Trump administration has prepared a new executive order that would extinguish regulatory controls designed to prevent US companies profiting from and encouraging the spread of “conflict minerals” that are inflaming violence in Congo.

    A draft executive order, composed last week and obtained by the Guardian, proposes a two-year suspension of a portion of the Dodd-Frank financial reforms that requires US firms to carry out due diligence to ensure that the products they sell include no minerals mined in the Democratic Republic of the Congo or neighbouring countries. The regulation was widely applauded as a mainstay of attempts to cut the umbilical chord between big business and violent warlords who have spread unrest throughout the Congo and caused the deaths of more than five million people since the 1990s.

    The draft order claims that it is temporarily scrapping the rule, contained in section 1502 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act that was introduced in 2010, out of concern for human rights in the war-torn African country. It alleges that there is mounting evidence that the obligation on US firms to prove to regulators that they are not involved in blood minerals has caused harm to some parties in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and have thereby contributed to instability in the region and threatened the national security interest of the United States.

    [… I]nternational aid groups working with the Congolese victims of conflict minerals — such as blood diamonds and the mining of coltan that is widely used in mobile phones and other tech gadgetry — have lashed out at the proposal, saying that far from being a humanitarian measure it would embolden armed groups and the unscrupulous businesses in cahoots with them. Global Witness, which for years has investigated the role of mining in fuelling violence in eastern Congo, said that were the draft executive order put into effect it would be a “gift to companies wanting to do business with the criminal and the corrupt”.

    […]

    I assume the dalekocracy’s Exterminate! Order to reinstate slavery is now being drafted. Not having to pay workers would end the harm to some parties […] and have thereby contributed to instability; that is, costs would lower so — in this bogus form of economics — profits would increase.

  145. says

    blf @181, very funny. But I think the author gives Trump too much credit. Trump could not think ahead far enough to reserve the army “for suppressing the domestic population.” … but now that someone else has suggested it ….

    In other news, McConnell is desperately lying:

    Mr. McConnell, a Kentucky Republican and the majority leader, says he and his Senate Republican colleagues are quite satisfied with the Trump team so far. In fact, he said, they are reassured by signs that President Trump is going to hew to a conservative agenda after early fears that the president—a relatively unknown quantity to most elected Republicans—might not really be one of them.

    “The country doesn’t need saving,” Mr. McConnell said when asked during an interview in his Capitol office if there was any cause for a senior-level congressional intervention given early chaos in the evolving West Wing.

    “I think there is a high level of satisfaction with the new administration,” he said, dismissing concerns about dissonant eruptions from the new president and some of his top staff members. “Our members are not obsessed with the daily tweets, but are looking at the results.”

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/08/us/politics/mitch-mcconnell-donald-trump-republicans.html

  146. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    Has anybody come up with what is meant by “extreme vetting”, and how it differs from the present process, and how the real terrorists would be tripped up and acknowledge they want to blow up the USA? Inquiring minds want to know.

  147. says

    Nerd @185, the Trump administration has not defined “extreme vetting,” not completely anyway.

    Trump talked at one time about an ideological test designed to refuse entry to anyone who does not share “American values.” At one point, Trump said that the people he wants to allow in have to “love us.”

    Trump has not been clear about whether “extreme vetting” would be applied to all visitors, or to would-be-immigrants, or to refugees. We don’t know.

  148. says

    blf @180, that factory expansion was announced by INTEL in 2011. It was on hold for a bit thanks to weak demand in the personal computer market.

    I think it is likely that Brian Krzanich saw an opportunity to manipulate Trump into arranging for the updated announcement in the White House Oval office. Good PR move.

  149. blf says

    I don’t think there is much of anything new, different, or too interesting in this (but I could easily be wrong), Trump lashes out again at judges over travel ban and calls hearing disgraceful, except for this one tidbit:

    President [sic] tells crowd of law enforcement officials that executive order couldn’t be written any plainer or better, before vowing to reduce violence in Chicago

    […]

    Trump, [blathering on the on-going appeal to reinstate the Muslim / migrant ban]: I was a good student, I understand things, I comprehend very well, OK? Better than, I think, almost anybody. And I want to tell you that I listened to a bunch of stuff last night on television that was disgraceful, it was disgraceful, because what I just read to you is what we have and it just can’t be written any plainer or better.

    Also:

    [Hair furor] repeated his promises to reduce violence in Chicago, where he said more than 4,000 people were shot last year (the exact figure is 3,550), and argued that “no one in America should be punished” because of their birthplace. [Unless, of course, you are a Muslim originally from, say, Yemen… –blf]

  150. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    Lynna #187, so I’m not the only on confused by Trump’s vague idea. I suspect he is also confused, as he has no idea of the present vetting.

  151. says

    Nerd, here’s a followup to 187.

    People who want to visit the United States could be asked to hand over their social-media passwords to officials as part of enhanced security checks, the country’s top domestic security chief said.

    Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly told Congress on Tuesday the measure was one of several being considered to vet refugees and visa applicants from seven Muslim-majority countries.

    “We want to get on their social media, with passwords: What do you do, what do you say?” he told the House Homeland Security Committee. “If they don’t want to cooperate then you don’t come in.” […]

    NBC News link

  152. says

    Nerd @190, yes. Trump is the original source of confusion. He said “extreme vetting” and then repeated “extreme” with extreme emphasis twice. Why? He liked the sound of it.

  153. blf says

    I wonder if she even knows where Canada is? Sarah Palin touted as US ambassador to Canada? You betcha!

    There’s some hilarious tweets quoted, such as “Just cus @SarahPalinUSA ‘probably’ knows the difference between a moose & a beaver shouldn’t make her a Canadian ambassador option.” And “Dear Mr Trump: Rather than appoint Sarah Palin as ambassador to Canada, please bomb us. Signed, all intelligent life in Canada.”

    The article concludes with some a snarking, eh:

    Whether Palin would actually want the posting is another question. The job would require her to give up a lucrative trade in speeches and television appearances, worth an estimated $12m to date, columnist Andrew Cohen noted in the Ottawa Citizen.

    He added: “In Canada, Palin would have to learn to speak one of our official languages. She would have to live in a land of naïfs who favour immigrants, gay marriage, the United Nations and NATO.”

  154. What a Maroon, living up to the 'nym says

    Il Douch-ay’s attacks on the judicial branch drew criticism from an unexpected source:

    Update: Among those feeling threatened by Trump’s comments is apparently his Supreme Court nominee, Neil Gorsuch. Gorsuch told Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) Wednesday that Trump’s comments are “disheartening” and “demoralizing” to the independence of the judiciary. Blumenthal relayed Gorsuch’s comments to reporters, and a Gorsuch spokesman confirmed them.

    How long till Trump calls Gorsuch a traitor?

  155. blf says

    Gary Younge, writing in the Grauniad, Trump fears terrorists, but more Americans are shot dead by toddlers:

    Gun deaths — intentional, accidental and self-inflicted — dwarf those related to terror. The talk is of secure borders but within the US many live in a state of fear

    […]

    When the president [sic] uses his executive powers to ban more than 200 million people from entering America, ostensibly in the interests of security, and then, in the same week, the House of Representatives relaxes background checks for gun ownership, one is compelled to question the sense of proportionality when it comes to security. Whom do they intend to keep safe? By what means? And at what price to liberty?

    Let us leave aside for the moment the fact that since 9/11 not a single American has been killed in a terrorist attack by a citizen from the countries on this list. The reality is that an American is at least twice as likely to be shot dead by a toddler than killed by a terrorist. In 2014 88 Americans were shot dead, on average, every day: 58 killed themselves while 30 were murdered. In that same year 18 Americans were killed by terrorist attacks in the US. Put more starkly: more Americans were killed by firearms roughly every five hours than were killed by terrorists in an entire year. It is unlikely that scrapping a rule requiring extended background checks for gun purchases by some social security recipients suffering from mental illness will improve the situation.

    (To hide behind the mantra “guns don’t kill people, people kill people” is an act of fallacious sophistry. Toasters don’t make toast, people make toast. True. But toasters exist to make toast: guns exist to kill people.)

    […]

    Many of those who insist that, when it comes to terror, one must balance individual rights against collective security, become curiously silent when it comes to adapting their interpretation of the right to bear arms to the issue of public safety.

    […]

    If the current administration applied just half the zeal to making sure all people in the country feel included and safe as they do to making sure some outside of it feel excluded and anxious, the impact on Americans’ sense of security would be repaid exponentially.

    After a judge blocked the Muslim ban over the weekend Trump said that if there was another terrorist attack America should blame him. Between me writing this article and you reading it the chances are another child will be shot dead. Whom, I wonder, should we blame for that?

  156. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    People who want to visit the United States could be asked to hand over their social-media passwords to officials as part of enhanced security checks, the country’s top domestic security chief said.

    Hmm…Sounds like a terrorist would create a false account to make them look innocent, and get admitted. Especially if they say they love Trump (ISIS does, so it’s not a lie). Do these folks trying to do the “extreme vetting” really have their act together? Sounds like they flailing around in the dark, not knowing what they are doing. Nothing but more theater that doesn’t quite do what they want.

  157. microraptor says

    Lynna @178:

    Can you imagine Trump’s reaction if Rosie O’Donnell played him on TV?

  158. blf says

    Nerd@196, I would like to hope anyone who hands over their passphrase(s) would then, as soon as possible, change them. But if you are stooopid enough to hand it over in the first place…

    Other flaws (in addition to “fake” account(s)): New mobile phone & SIM with no history; Posts aren’t in English; Passphrases contain characters not typical in English (e.g., ç and many others); Two-factor authentication; Simply delete the account as soon as possible afterwards; and so on — some of these simply slow down any spying, others mislead…

    I’m inclined to think the superdoopergeniuses involved don’t even know what they are trying to accomplish or how to determine if it has been accomplished. Not to mention if there is even any point to whatever it is they want to accomplish.

  159. says

    The Yemen raid is tragic, even more so because it increasingly looks like it was approved for ego/propaganda purposes and because they’re lying about it.

    Sessions has been confirmed as AG.

    A white supremacist bonehead in GA is under arrest/investigation after apparently self-poisoning with ricin.

    Trump’s tweet about Nordstrom was retweeted from the official POTUS account. (Incidentally, TJX told stores to take down any signs advertising Ivanka Trump junk, which they’ll evidently continue to stock. Since this is, like, the definition of half-assed, I’m going to continue boycotting their stores.)

    I’m giving this tweet o’ the day, because I think I posted about it months ago but had forgotten about it. Just a disgusting human being.

  160. tomh says

    You gotta like Pennsylvania state Sen. Daylin Leach, who linked to Trump’s bombast about “destroying the career” of a Texas state senator who introduced legislation to curb civil asset forfeiture, and then posted on both Facebook and Twitter, “Hey! I oppose civil asset forfeiture too. Why don’t you come after me you fascist, loofa-faced shit-gibbon!!”

  161. says

    I’ll believe Gorsuch’s comments about Trump’s attempts to delegitimize the judiciary when he removes himself from consideration. The writing has been on the wall – about Trump’s corruption, relationship to/with Putin, dishonesty, incompetence, ignorance, irrationality, instability, destructiveness, authoritarianism, lawlessness, and general repulsiveness – for far too long for Gorsuch to remain the nominee and retain any credibility.

  162. says

    microraptor @197, some people have suggested that the entire top-level Trump team, and Trump himself of course, should be played by females on Saturday Night Live. I think it’s a good idea. For balance, someone suggested that Bill Hader play Melania Trump.

    What a Maroon @199, not only do we get Jefferson Davis Beauregard Sessions as Attorney General, but as Rachel Maddow pointed out, Sessions gets to bring along his favorite racist and anti-gay buddy, Charles (Chuck) Cooper. As is Maddow’s won’t, she gives us about eight minutes of relevant history before bringing us up to date with Sessions and Cooper.

    For the Reagan administration, Cooper defended Bob Jones University’s ban against interracial dating (the 1982 lawsuit involved tax exemptions granted by the IRS). Reagan used people in the Justice Department to defend an exemption Reagan gave to Bob Jones University so that the university could continue to ban interracial dating while also receiving a tax exemption. “A band of young zealots in the [Justice] department pressed for the legal switch to give Bob Jones its tax exemption,” Anthony Lewis wrote in The New York Times. This is where, at the 8:58-minute mark in the Maddow video that we meet one of the young zealots, Charles Cooper.

    Cooper was later promoted to Assistant Attorney General. He was the point man for a Justice Department ruling that allowed employers to fire AIDS victims. Cooper later defended California’s same-sex marriage ban before the Supreme Court. Cooper has an impressive [cough] record of losing cases he defends before the Supreme Court.

    And now, Jeff Sessions gets a little gift from Trump: Chuck Cooper is about to be named as solicitor general of the United States. Sessions wanted Cooper for the job of main litigator for the Department of Justice. Cooper is reportedly one of Jeff Session’s best friends, an “old buddy from Alabama.”

    Maddow continues her segment by weaving together the various racist, misogynistic, anti-gay threads that show up in the Trump administration’s choices, and in the ways that Republicans in the Senate are backing up all of these choices. Shutting up Elizabeth Warren is included. Maddow concludes that all of the Republicans involved “do not give a flying, freaking, fruitcake, ficus, fjord —we do not give and F’s about being totally, unreconstructed on race!”

  163. says

    I agree with SC @202. Gorsuch said something true behind closed doors, quietly. He is not out there publicly and in front of cameras condemning Trump’s attacks on the judiciary (and on some judges in particular). Chuck Schumer said that he thinks Gorsuch is being too meek.

  164. quotetheunquote says

    blf #193-

    “Dear Mr Trump: Rather than appoint Sarah Palin as ambassador to Canada, please bomb us. Signed, all intelligent life in Canada.”

    Yes, it certainly does look like the Herr Furor is intent on punishing us, preemptively, for the trade disputes that will inevitably arise when he and his minions turn their attention to NAFTA. (Given how keen he is to preemptively punish “the mooslems”, and his own so-called judges, that attention may be years in coming…) But I’m sure she is well aware of where Canada is – it’s all that empty space on the other side of Wrangell.

    “the”

  165. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    Trump tweets out of his ass again, this time about comments made by his SCOTUS nominee.

    President Donald Trump on Thursday disputed accounts that his Supreme Court pick was disheartened by the Republican president’s attacks on judges, saying Judge Neil Gorsuch’s comments were misrepresented.
    Gorsuch’s remarks describing Trump’s Twitter attacks on the judiciary as “demoralizing” and “disheartening” were confirmed on Wednesday by Ron Bonjean, a Republican strategist hired by the White House to guide his nomination through the U.S. Senate.
    Gorsuch made those comments in a meeting with Democratic Senator Richard Blumenthal, who had urged him to go public.
    Trump, offering no evidence and taking a swipe at Blumenthal, disputed the account in a Twitter post early on Thursday.

    The quote was confirmed by Blumenthal, and representatives of Gorsuch, making the quote well evidenced. Where is Trump getting his evidence from? His farts?

  166. says

    Nerd @207, during the campaign Trump referred to his list of potential Supreme Court judges as “my judges.” He used the same phrase during campaign rallies when he made promises at rallies. “My judges.” That tells you what he expects.

    In other news, Matt Yglesias, writing for Vox, pointed out that Trump seems to be encouraging the kind of financial risk-taking that endangered our economy in 2007-2008.

  167. says

    Kellyanne Conway appeared on Fox & Friends this morning. During the interview, she told viewers to buy products from Ivanka Trump’s clothing line:

    Conway referred to Ivanka as a “champion for women empowerment, women in the workplace,” before adding, “Go buy Ivanka’s stuff, is what I would tell you. I hate shopping, and I’m gonna go get some on myself today.”

    The law says:

    An employee shall not use his public office for his own private gain, for the endorsement of any product, service or enterprise, or for the private gain of friends, relatives, or persons with whom the employee is affiliated in a nongovernmental capacity, including nonprofit organizations of which the employee is an officer or member, and persons with whom the employee has or seeks employment or business relations.

    https://twitter.com/ChrisLu44/status/829689186949148674

    Conway blatantly broke the law.

  168. says

    Trump lost a case in South Carolina. He is going to have to pay for environmental cleanup of toxic waste on one of his properties. The taxpayers of South Carolina are not going to pay for it.

    Rachel Maddow covered the story. Near the end of the segment, Maddow emphatically pointed out that Trump’s lawyer lied to her face in an earlier interview about the company in South Carolina, including a lie about the toxic cleanup. Don’t lie to Rachel. She will catch you and she will expose the lie.

  169. What a Maroon, living up to the 'nym says

    Il Douche-ay is attacking McCain again, this time for calling the attack in Yemen a failure (later downgraded to not a success):

    Sen. McCain should not be talking about the success or failure of a mission to the media. Only emboldens the enemy! He’s been losing so long he doesn’t know how to win anymore, just look at the mess our country is in – bogged down in conflict all over the place. Our hero Ryan died on a winning mission ( according to General Mattis), not a “failure.” Time for the U.S. to get smart and start winning again!

    Trump keeps encouraging us to Get Smart! Perhaps he should have the Cone of Silence installed in the Oval Office.

  170. says

    Trump signed three more executive orders today. No details were provided to the press, not yet anyway. Sounds like the usual blather from Trump. I guess we’ll find out how bad the consequences will be later.

    […] directing the departments of Justice and Homeland Security to “undertake all necessary and lawful action to break the back of the criminal cartels that have spread across our nation and are destroying the blood of our youth and other people, many other people.”

    “Enforcing federal law with respect to the trans-national criminal organization in preventing international trafficking,” Trump read as he signed the order later.

    The second order, he said, would direct the Department of Justice “to form a task force on reducing violent crime in America.” Later he described it as a “task force on crime reduction and public safety.”

    Finally, Trump said, he would direct the Department of Justice “to implement a plan to stop crime and crimes of violence against law enforcement officers.”

    “It’s a shame what’s been happening to our great, truly great, law enforcement officers. That’s going to stop as of today,” he said, reading later while signing the order: “Preventing violence against federal, state, tribal and local law enforcement officials.” […]

    “Today’s ceremony should be seen as a clear message to the gang members and drug dealers terrorizing innocent people, your day is over. A new era of justice begins, and it begins right now,” Trump said at the end of his prepared remarks, before he signed the orders.

    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/trump-signs-executive-orders-justice-department

  171. says

    The horror of Trump’s executive order mandating more deportations has begun.

    […] Trump’s program of increased deportation of immigrants cranked up on Wednesday when an Arizona woman was taken away in front of her crying children and put in a van for Mexico after more than two decades of living peacefully in the United States. […]

    Guadalupe Garcia de Rayos is a convicted felon, but her felony was being caught in a workplace raid more than a decade ago and being charged with “working in the country illegally” — not exactly what most people had in mind when Trump said he would first go after “criminal” immigrants.

    “What we are going to do is get the people that are criminal and have criminal records, gang members, drug dealers, where a lot of these people, probably 2 million, it could be even 3 million, we are getting them out of our country or we are going to incarcerate,” he said in the interview, to air on “60 Minutes” on CBS.

    That’s what Donald Trump said. But that’s not the instructions that have been given to ICE. What’s happening in the world outside Donald Trump’s speeches is that good people voluntarily reporting their status, are being punished for their cooperation.

    […] when Garcia de Rayos went to check in as usual at the central Phoenix offices of Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Instead of being released, she was taken into custody, while her husband, two children — both U.S.-born citizens — and a group of supporters watched in tears.

    Guadalupe Garcia de Rayos was brought to the United States when she was only fourteen, and has lived in Arizona for twenty-two years. She was married there, worked there, and raised a family there. Her own 14-year-old daughter was there on Wednesday to see her mother taken away. […]

    Trump’s order is a major departure from former President Barack Obama’s deportation priorities, which focused primarily on deporting undocumented immigrants convicted of serious crimes and allowing those with long ties to the U.S. and no significant criminal background to remain in the U.S.
    What Trump’s executive order has done is to is put in place rules that punish everyone but criminals.

    “It has 100 percent to do with the executive order,” said Ray Ybarra-Maldonado, a Phoenix immigration lawyer who is representing Garcia de Rayos. “Her case is no different than the last time she checked in. The facts are 100 percent the same. The only difference is the priorities for removal have now changed.”

    Link

  172. says

    The Hague Conventions make it clear that plundering a country’s natural resources is a war crime. Destroying or seizing an enemy’s property is prohibited. The Geneva Conventions state that “pillage is prohibited.”

    Donald Trump doesn’t care. During a meeting with airline industry bigwigs today, Trump endorsed the commission of war crimes … again.

    […] After talking about the condition of American airports, Trump said, “We spent 6 trillion dollars in the Middle East. We’ve got nothing. We never even kept even a little tiny oil well. I said, ‘Keep the oil.’”

    Trump suggested that the oil proceeds could fund a major government infrastructure project. “We’ve spent 6 trillion dollars in the Middle East. We have nothing, and we have an obsolete plane system, obsolete airports, obsolete trains, we have bad roads. We’re going to change all of that folks. You’re going to be so happy with Trump. I think you already are.” […]

    Think Progress link

    BTW, the USA is a signatory to both the Hague and Geneva Conventions.

  173. says

    What a Maroon @211, Trump thinks that “doesn’t know how to win anymore” is the ultimate insult. McCain still has an ethical core and Trump has none.

    Sean Spicer indirectly dissed McCain, and directly criticized everyone who noted that the raid in Yemen was not a total success. Spicer even called for McCain to apologize.

    An excerpt from McCain’s reply:

    Many years ago when I was imprisoned in North Vietnam there was an attempt to rescue the POWs. Unfortunately, the prison had been evacuated but the brave men who took—risked their lives in an effort to rescue us prisoners of war were genuine American heroes,” McCain said. “Because the mission failed did not in any way diminish their courage and willingness to help their fellow Americans who were held captive. Mr. Spicer should know that story.

  174. says

    Isn’t being married to an American citizen an automatic green card and quick path to citizenship? We are starting to see the real horror of our situation, our worst fears since the election and inauguration, become reality.

    Between Lynna’s 212 and 213 alone it is clear that we are now living in a dictatorial police state.

    How on earth are you going to “Stop violence against police officers”? These things are already illegal, already carry with them severe penalties. The only way is to turn the police in to the military. Place them in tanks, arm them with fully automatic weapons, have them travel in groups. Are we headed for APC’s driving down our streets instead of cruisers being a regular thing? That’s the only way I can reasonably imagine ending violence against police “as of today”.

    We don’t fucking need MORE law enforcement, we need LESS. We already have too many of our citizens in jail for non-violent offenses.

    What “Criminal Cartel” is he talking about?

  175. says

    Samantha Bee reviewed the latest news. Scroll down for video.

    An excellent segment.

    “A sentient bag of hairspray fumes was put in charge of education.”

    “First, after briefly banning Kellyanne Conway for being a flaxen-haired fountain of lies, CNN let her back through the gates, straight into Jake Tapper’s cage. And they haven’t fed him this week.”

  176. says

    India Thusi wrote an opinion piece for The Hill, “Trump’s presidency places democracy in the crosshairs.”

    Excerpts:

    “Democracies die behind closed doors. The First Amendment, through a free press, protects the people’s right to know that their government acts fairly, lawfully, and accurately . . . . When government begins closing doors, it selectively controls information rightfully belonging to the people. Selective information is misinformation. The Framers of the First Amendment ‘did not trust any government to separate the true from the false for us.’” -Judge Damon J. Keith, Detroit Free Press v. Ashcroft, 303 F.3d 681 (6th Cir. 2002)

    We can turn to these famous words by Judge Damon J. Keith as a reminder of this government’s fundamental commitment to transparency and accountability. Judge Keith dared to stand up against former President George W. Bush when he instituted a program of secret deportations, and reminded us of the importance of government transparency when he declared that “democracies die behind closed doors.” […]

    President Donald Trump aims to threaten both principles [accountability and transparency] through his continued attacks against the press, ad hominem attacks of federal judges, presidential appointments of cronies and ideologues committed to white supremacy and nativism, and reliance on personal vendettas and threats as a form of governance. […]

    Sort of a followup to erik’s comment 216.

  177. says

    “The Mysterious Disappearance of the Biggest Scandal in Washington: Whatever happened to the Trump-Russia story? “:

    The biggest election-related scandal since Watergate occurred last year, and it has largely disappeared from the political-media landscape of Washington.

    There have been plenty of significant topics for journalists to press Spicer and the administration on—the travel ban on refugees and immigrants from Muslim-majority countries, Trump’s plan to dump Obamacare, various nominations and a Supreme Court pick, Trump’s fact-free charge of widespread voter fraud, Steve Bannon’s participation on the National Security Council, Trump’s contentious calls with foreign leaders, the president’s erratic behavior, and much more. But the lack of media attention to the Russia story, at the White House briefings and beyond, is curious. It is true that the intelligence committee probes are being conducted secretly, and there are no public hearings or actions to cover. (Republican leaders on Capitol Hill, hoping to confine this scandal, succeeded in preventing the creation of a special committee or an independent commission to probe this affair—either of which would have probably sparked more coverage than the highly secretive intelligence committees.) Still, in the past, pundits, politicians, and reporters in Washington have not been reluctant to go all-out in covering and commenting upon a controversy subjected to private investigation.

    In this instance, the president’s own people may be under investigation, and Trump has demonstrated no interest in holding Putin accountable for messing with US elections in what may be considered an act of covert warfare. Still, there has been no loud demand from the DC media (or most of the GOP) for answers and explanations. This quietude is good news for Putin—and reason for him to think he could get away with such an operation again.

  178. says

    This is a well-written account that places personal tragedy in an historical context, and which condemns Trump’s executive order banning anyone from seven countries from entering the U.S.

    I’m an Iraqi who risked my life for America. Trump’s visa ban puts my family in grave danger.

    Excerpt:

    […] We have waited for years while going through the steps: the refugee application, the background check, the Embassy interviews, the pleas to remove my nieces and nephews from the danger of revenge. And last week, just days before my sister’s scheduled interview with the Department of Homeland Security, President Donald Trump’s executive order banning anyone from seven Muslim-majority countries has shattered my family’s hopes of being reunited again.

    My story is not unique. Thousands of Iraqis assisted the US Army as translators or workers during the war. Of these, many are still patiently waiting to seek refuge from retaliatory violence by fleeing to the United States — though the US government won’t give an exact number, only 19 were granted visas in the last three years.

    Trump’s Muslim ban has destroyed the hopes of the people already in the midst of the long and arduous emigration process. While the administration has relaxed its rules to exclude those who worked with the US Army from the ban, it does nothing to help extended family members who are often at risk of vengeful danger.

    All I can hope is that the executive order is permanently reversed before something terrible happens to my family. […]

    I recommend reading the entire article. The author was kidnapped and tortured for working with Americans in Iraq. He escaped when U.S. soldiers conducted a raid. He now lives in the U.S. His extended family remains in extreme danger in Iraq. Here in the U.S., Zakariya Al Sagheer is worried about ominous changes.

    […] I have to say: I’m very scared of what is happening here. I’m scared because I’ve seen it before, in my own home country, and what I’m seeing is the rise of a dictator. I fear that everything I fled in Iraq is materializing right here in the United States. And I feel powerless to stop it.

    If I could say one thing to my American neighbors, it’s that my country and my fellow Iraqis are not the people to fear. We are the victims of terrorism, and we have shed blood fighting this ideology of hate in our hometowns. To ban everyone from Iraq and these other countries is to shut out the millions of people who suffer from violent terrorism the most. […]

    Zakariya Al Sagheer’s nephew, who is just a child has already been abducted once. He was returned to his family, but the threat is real and imminent.

  179. slithey tove (twas brillig (stevem)) says

    KellyAnne Conwayward’s ‘alternative facts’ strongly recommend buying Ivanka’s clothing line to stick it to Nordstrom. Spicey Ant is also claiming boycotting Ivanka’s clothes is a direct attack on POTUS.
    and he likes to call everyone else “snowflakes” and “whiners”. He needs to look in the mirror for a snowflake and whiner.
    Telling the country to buy a particular product is what he is required to leave behind when occupying the office of presidency.
    It was also Drumph himself pitching sales of Ivanka products, not just his mouthpeezes: Conwayward and Spicey.

    Calling the Ethics office to lodge complaint reroutes calls to “number dialed must be preceeded by 9” total BS. I’ll bet Trump has forced the phones to be routed to this robomessage to thwart complaints.

  180. slithey tove (twas brillig (stevem)) says

    two more cities, in addition to Seattle, have withdrawn their budget funds from WellsFargo to tell WF to stop supporting DAPL.

    ———————————————–
    Dear Wells Fargo,
    ……….#NoDAP
    signed,
    ………everyone outside of Trump.
    ———————————————–

  181. says

    SC @221, that’s a good article. I will add that during his acceptance speech after the swearing-in ceremony, Jeff Sessions repeated Trump’s lies about the increases in violent crime. So those two doofuses are on the same page. I’m not surprised that Trump combined the swearing-in ceremony with “law and order” executive orders. The birth of the police state (as was noted up-thread).

  182. says

    Wonkette thinks it’s possible that Ivanka Trump is just bad at fashion.

    Other companies have also dropped the made-in-China line (SC @223):
    Nordstrom
    Neiman Marcus
    Home Shopping Network
    ShopStyle

    Wonkette provides photos and fashion analysis to make their point.

  183. says

    Katy Tur just asked Maxine Waters if we should expect to see a stalemate in congress for the next four years, and Waters answered “I don’t think so, because he’s not going to be there for four years,” that Trump is leading himself into impeachment and “it’s not going to last very long.” She called him outrageous and ridiculous, and referred a few times to the relationship with Putin.

  184. says

    Oh, no. Trump edges us closer to the danger of nuclear proliferation and/or war.

    […] Trump described the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, or START, signed by former president Barack Obama in 2010, as a bad deal for the United States, according to a Reuters report. The treaty requires America and Russia to cap their deployed strategic nuclear warheads at 1,550 by February 2018, as well as limit their deployed land- and submarine-based missiles and nuclear-capable bombers.

    According to the sources who spoke with Reuters, however, Trump seemed unfamiliar with the details of New START when it was brought up by Russian leader Vladimir Putin. After Putin suggested extending New START beyond its original time frame, Trump referred to the treaty as one of many bad deals that Obama had negotiated.

    If New START is not mutually extended, neither America nor Russia would be limited in their nuclear production, which could trigger a nuclear arms race.

    The sources also say that Trump then turned the conversation toward the subject of his own supposed popularity within the United States. […]

    Link

  185. says

    SC @229, the Obama administration deserves credit for that fight in Mosul, and for a lot of the limitations on the spread of ISIS. Yes, Trump might fuck it up. We can only hope that he doesn’t put his attention on Mosul until after the fight is won. (Then he can take credit.)

    In other news, can you imagine how fast the Republican-dominated House Oversight Committee would have jumped on Hillary Clinton if she had defended her daughter’s business, had criticized Nordstroms, and had allowed her top aides to suggest that people do business with her daughter?

    And in other, other news, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer’s office put out a statement estimating that the number of calls per day from citizens to Capitol Hill has reached around 1.5 million.

  186. says

    More anti-Muslim, prejudiced rhetoric from Trump’s National Security Council: Michael Anton, a staffer who was appointed by Trump, wrote some really stupid stuff under a pseudonym.

    […] Islam is an inherently violent religion that is “incompatible with the modern West,” [Anton] defended the World War II-era America First Committee, which included anti-Semites, as “unfairly maligned” and called diversity “a source of weakness, tension and disunion.” […]

    HuffPo link.

    The Trump administration must not vet any of these people. Or, perhaps they do vet them and they like what they see?

  187. says

    SC @219, Neither Trump nor Republicans in general are talking about the assessment of US intelligence agencies that Russian intelligence backed a campaign to interfere in an election in the USA. I think they aren’t talking about it because that story is full of the kinds of facts they fear the most.

    That Putin-backed interference is really the best route to discrediting Trump and some of his minions.

    Republicans and Trump have buried the story. This makes me wonder what kind of pressure they have brought to bear in order to get US intelligence agencies to slow-walk and/or bury the investigation. Can they strip funds and personnel from the investigation? Can they insist that other priorities are addressed?

  188. says

    Who is giddy with happiness over the confirmation of Jeff Sessions as Attorney General? White Nationalists.

    David Duke: “Thank God After 8 Horrible Years Of Black Radical Marxists We Finally Have An AG Who Will Defend Decent American People – Rather Than Thugs.”

    Paul Ray Ramsey: “Great News! Hopefully, He Can Start Targeting Domestic Terrorist Groups Such As #BlackLivesMatter.”

    Hunter Wallace celebrated by posting a photo of Jeff Sessions in a Confederate army uniform: “Congratulation, Attorney General Jeff Sessions.”

    VDare: “Fight Of Jeff Sessions To Turn GOP Into A National Conservative Party Has Been Going On A Long Time. Now, Victory.”

    Tim Treadstone: “Congrats To The Honorable Jeff Sessions For Officially Becoming Our New Attorney General! He Will Truly Make Our Country Great!” Tim Treadstone, a member of the “alt right” white nationalist movement who goes by the moniker “Baked Alaska,” celebrated on Twitter.

    Daily Stormer: “Honestly, I didn’t even expect this to all come together so beautifully. It’s like we’re going to get absolutely everything we wanted. […]

    Of course, I was thinking of Sessions for either Secretary of State or Defense, but I think Trump is making a point by putting an aggressive anti-Black racist in as AG. It’s a corrective measure, after Obama turned the Justice Department into the Black Panthers. [The Daily Stormer, 11/18/16]

  189. says

    Reaction to Kellyanne Conway’s violation of ethics rules apparently broke the Office of Government Ethics website.

    The website of the federal government’s ethics watchdog has been inaccessible for hours, and agency officials say it’s because of surging traffic.

    “We received a high volume of traffic and we are looking at ways to redirect traffic and add capacity,” a spokesman for the Office of Government Ethics said. […]

  190. says

    Strange that a supposed white power moron like Treadstone would call himself Baked Alaska. Baked Alaska the ice cream dish is often brownish on the outside, and often has chocolate in the filling. He’s kind of implying that he might be part African American, isn’t he?

    Regarding Lynna’s post at 214 Trump talking about himself in the third person in public can’t be a good sign.

  191. says

    “Secrecy surrounds White House cybersecurity staff shakeup”:

    The chief information security officer for the White House’s Executive Office of the President has been removed from his position, sources have confirmed.

    Cory Louie was appointed to the position by former President Obama in 2015, charged with keeping safe the staff closest to the president — including the president himself — from cyber-threats posed by hackers and nation-state attackers.

    But circumstances surrounding his departure, weeks after President Donald Trump took office, remain unclear.

    It’s thought he was either fired or asked to resign last Thursday evening, and he was escorted out from his office in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building across the street from the West Wing.

    Since then, there has been a near-absolute wall of silence from the White House — from both the staff, which up until last week worked for Louie, and spokespeople for the Trump administration.

    However [?], one source said it’s because the remaining staff have “targets on their back” and are afraid of speaking out, calling the actions a “witch hunt” for former Obama appointees. Accusations of poor management were said to be reasons or excuses for his forced departure amid what was described as a “toxic” working environment….

  192. says

    Once again Spicer is losing his shit in front of the press corps and one again he’s trying to deflect by pointing out things BO did. (This is a common theme with republicans BTW. Never accept responsibility, always deflect and project and always point out that you aren’t the only one behaving badly.)

    It’s emotionally immature to point to the other kids that are doing the same thing when called out for bad behavior.

    “I get it, but at some point it seems like there’s clearly a double standard when it’s how this is applied,” Spicer said. “When President Obama did it, there was no concern from this briefing room. When [Trump] does it, it’s, you know, a ton of outrage.”

    http://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/sean-spicer-fights-with-media-during-press-briefing-234858

  193. says

    Followup to comment 238.

    The ruling was not on the merits of ban itself, but rather a decision to continue blocking the ban while the executive order itself is under review.

  194. says

    Another way to look at the ruling from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals is that those three judges refused to reinstate Trump’s ban on travelers from seven countries. They left U.S. District Judge James Robart’s temporary restraining order in place.

  195. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    Not surprised by the Circuit Court of Appeals ruling. If The Trump is smart, he would use the ruling the to put out a new EO that is properly done, with due consideration. But he isn’t smart. So I expect it is either his way or the highway, and he may be shown the highway….And a terrible temper tantrum will result.

  196. says

    More ugly far rightwing crap shows up:

    A Central Michigan University Republican student group is apologizing for a Valentine’s Day card that mocks Jews who died in the Holocaust.

    The College Republicans group handed out gift bags to students Wednesday night, including one with a card that said “my love 4 u burns like 6,000 jews.” It had a photo of Adolf Hitler and was signed “XOXO, Courtney.” […]

    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/college-republicans-sorry-hitler-valentines-card

    The group posted an apology on Facebook, and also stated that they do not condone anti-Semitism.

  197. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    The group posted an apology on Facebook, and also stated that they do not condone anti-Semitism.

    Excuse my *snicker*.

  198. says

    Nerd @243, yes, I too am expecting a childish tantrum. We’ll see.

    I was listening to some rightwingers discuss how they thought Trump’s ban would be upheld when the decision came through. Schadenfreude moment.

  199. says

    Excerpts from what the three-judge panel wrote:

    “Rather than present evidence to explain the need for the Executive Order, the Government has taken the position that we must not review its decision at all. We disagree,” the three judge panel wrote.

    “In short, although courts owe considerable deference to the President’s policy determinations with respect to immigration and national security, it is beyond question that the federal judiciary retains the authority to adjudicate constitutional challenges to executive action.”

    The decision was unanimous.

  200. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    The decision was unanimous.

    Reading your quote, I can see the argument that SCOTUS will look at in detail. Arrogance (you cannot review my decision) could kill the administrations arguments with SCOTUS, who who likely feel the need to remind Trump he is subject to constitutional constraints. I would be leery to appeal such a ruling, if another alternative is available to me. IMHO.

  201. says

    I love this Supreme Court quote from page 17: “‘[N]ational defense’ cannot be deemed an end in itself, justifying any exercise of legislative power designed to promote such a goal…. It would indeed be ironic if, in the name of national defense, we would sanction the subversion of one of those liberties . . . which makes the defense of the Nation worthwhile.”

  202. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    Chris Hayes Town Hall episode on MSNBC about the crime situation in Chicago is delayed until tomorrow at 7 pm CT, due to the 9th appellate court decision. Tune in to see the real problems, not Trump’s delusional thinking.

  203. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    Chris Matthews is such a pinhead.

    Every time I watch Chris Matthews, I want a roll of duct tape….

  204. says

    Chris Matthews is becoming more of a pinhead as he ages. He should retire while even part of his reputation is at stake. Matthews is almost unwatchable.

    In other news, Charles (Chuck) Cooper has withdrawn. He is no longer being considered for the position of Solicitor General. One has to wonder if Rachel Maddow’s thorough reveal of Cooper’s odious past caused the Trump administration to ask him to withdraw. (See comments 203 and 205.)

  205. blf says

    Some more slapping down in the decision (Trump travel ban hits major setback after judges uphold temporary restraining order):

    […]
    On the confusion over the rights of lawful permanent residents caught up in the travel ban, the ruling notes: “At this point, however, we cannot rely upon the government’s contention that the executive order no longer applies to lawful permanent residents.”

    Then later continues: “Moreover, in light of the government’s shifting interpretations of the executive order, we cannot say that the current interpretation by White House counsel, even if authoritative and binding, will persist past the immediate stage of these proceedings.”

    Translation: Hair furor and the dalekocracy lies.
    And the lying can be used as evidence:

    Also in the opinion, the judges wrote that “it is well established that evidence of purpose” from a case’s context can be used in court — meaning that the states can cite Trump’s claims and tweets, for instance about his preference for Christians and call for a “complete and total shutdown of Muslims”, as admissible evidence.

    Trump’s long history of controversial statements, the court suggested, can therefore be used as legal weapons against him.
    […]

  206. says

    That whole buzzfeed article had me guffawing. Is it time for the snowflakes to start picking at the scab that trump is a weak minded idiot? More so than rail against his racism and narcissism? That does seem to make the rethuglicans raw and tends to get them to show their true nature.

    We won’t affect them by pointing out the racism, but we get their attention when we imply their leader and their ideology is weak and feeble, which he and it is.

    I was thinking about this earlier. I think, if we want to really get through to the average Trump voter, we should concentrate our talking points on what a weak position it is to live in fear of the the terrorist bogey man, and the mexican job stealing rapist. Put the message out there that we are smart enough to realize we take a larger risk getting into our cars everyday and driving to work than we do by allowing a few hundred thousand refugees, among whom maybe a few hundred or a few thousand turn out to be criminals or terrorists, and that we, as a fair and just society, can deal with that, because the alternative is turning them away and watching while they die.

    We need to keep hammering home the message that if you are getting put out of work by a migrant that doesn’t speak the local language, then maybe you haven’t prepared yourself well enough for the world and maybe your struggles are your own god damned fault and not the mexicans’.

    It’s the equivalent of Peter Singer’s analogy of watching someone drown in a pool because you don’t want to get your expensive leather shoes wet. It’s a weak minded ideology. It’s fear of the wrong things and a desire to blame everybody else but themselves for their problems, which is ironically, a very recent claim to fame of conservatives; “Personal Responsibility”

    I guess personal responsibility only applies when it’s somebody else that’s struggling to survive.

  207. psanity says

    Ooh! Ooh! Rachel Maddow just showed a photo of the Indivisible group in Morris, MN, And I think PZ was there — beardy guy near the middle. I was watching on the laptop, so it was a very small picture. I am proud of Morris (where I knocked on doors for Gene McCarthy when I was 12). Rock on!

  208. says

    Wow – just saw this on Rachel Maddow: “A number of officials cited in a report from The Washington Post contend that despite the denials from President Trump’s national security adviser Michael Flynn, that he did in fact discuss U.S. sanctions against Russia with the country’s ambassador before Trump took office.”

  209. says

    Not that everyone from Utah is Mormon, or republican, that crowd in genuinely liberal and pissed off, I’m just addressing the idea that you shouldn’t expect to see this from Utah, because Mormons. LDS is not behind this asshat.

  210. says

    Not that everyone from Utah is Mormon, or republican, that crowd in genuinely liberal and pissed off,

    That was what surprised me most – the support for Planned Parenthood, rejection of patriarchy, defense of aboriginal lands, etc. And just the boldness of the borderline-Rabelaisian confrontation with authority. (I’ll note once more that Chaffetz has been a member of two minority religions and should know better than to cave as he has.)

  211. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    Ooh! Ooh! Rachel Maddow just showed a photo of the Indivisible group in Morris, MN, And I think PZ was there — beardy guy near the middle. I was watching on the laptop, so it was a very small picture. I am proud of Morris (where I knocked on doors for Gene McCarthy when I was 12). Rock on!

    Dang, I was watching Rachael Maddow and appear to have dozed off for half an hour. Well, I woke up at 4 am this morning.

  212. says

    Update to #272:

    …The talks were part of a series of contacts between Flynn and Kislyak that began before the Nov. 8 election and continued during the transition, officials said. In a recent interview, Kislyak confirmed that he had communicated with Flynn by text message, by phone and in person, but declined to say whether they had discussed sanctions.

    The emerging details contradict public statements by incoming senior administration officials including Mike Pence, then the vice president-elect….

  213. says

    @282 – I think this only has legs if they were actually in touch prior to the lection. Anything after 11/9 could be considered normal outreach, although reaching out to the Russians before you’ve reached out to Europe is a catastrophically poor maneuver.

  214. says

    SC @272, this new revelation about Flynn’s conversations with the Russians will revive the outrage about the entire Trump-Russia connection. Flynn was not the only one who lied about discussing sanctions with the Russians before Trump became president. Reince Priebus, Sean Spicer and others told the same lie.

    Summary from the Washington Post:

    National security adviser Michael Flynn privately discussed U.S. sanctions against Russia with that country’s ambassador to the United States during the month before President Trump took office, contrary to public assertions by Trump officials, current and former U.S. officials said.

    Flynn’s communications with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak were interpreted by some senior U.S. officials as an inappropriate and potentially illegal signal to the Kremlin that it could expect a reprieve from sanctions that were being imposed by the Obama administration in late December to punish Russia for its alleged interference in the 2016 election. […]

  215. says

    Followup to comment 289.

    Vice President Mike Pence said during an interview on January 15 that Flynn “did not discuss anything having to do with the United States’ decision to expel diplomats or impose censure against Russia.”

    https://twitter.com/Rubin_Josh/status/829901787125669888

    And there’s this from The New York Times:

    Federal officials who have read the transcript of the call were surprised by Mr. Flynn’s comments, since he would have known that American eavesdroppers closely monitor such calls. They were even more surprised that Mr. Trump’s team publicly denied that the topics of conversation included sanctions.

  216. says

    About that wall that Trump wants to build on the southern border: it’s going to cost more, a lot more, than Trump claimed.

    An internal report at the Department of Homeland Security pegs the cost of a border wall with Mexico at $21.6 billion, […]

    According to Reuters, the estimate came from a group assembled by DHS Secretary John Kelly that the news wire described as a “final step” before moving to request taxpayer funds from Congress to begin on the wall.

    In February 2016, Trump claimed the barrier would cost $10 billion to 12 billion. Around the same time, the Washington Post’s fact-checkers, based on discussions with engineers and contractors, estimated the cost at $25 billion, at least.

    In late January of this year, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) said the wall would cost $12 to 15 billion. House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI) said the wall would cost up to $15 billion.

    Reuters reported that much of the cost disparity came from the expense of buying private land necessary for the wall’s construction, and the cost of complying with the International Boundary and Water Commission, a pact between the two nations over shared waters. […]

    Link

  217. says

    Trump insists on revealing, via Twitter, that he does not understand the laws relevant to his immigration executive order:

    LAWFARE: “Remarkably, in the entire opinion, the panel did not bother even to cite this (the) statute.” A disgraceful decision!

    Trump’s tweet shows that he read (or had someone read to him), and misunderstood, a blog post from the editor-in-chief of Lawfare, Benjamin Wittes. Wittes made it clear that he supports the court’s decision. He did add that it was “a pretty big omission” to leave out the statute granting the President broad authority to limit immigration. However, that mention does not add up to the conclusion Trump assumed. It did not add up to a “disgraceful decision.”

    https://www.lawfareblog.com/how-read-and-how-not-read-todays-9th-circuit-opinion

  218. says

    “Cummings: ‘Grave doubts’ about Flynn’s honesty”:

    The top Democrat on the House oversight committee is pleading with Republicans to investigate whether President Donald Trump’s top national security aide lied about his dealings with Russia and whether he’s fit to hold a security clearance.

    Seizing on reports that Michael Flynn secretly discussed sanctions with Russia’s U.S. ambassador in December, Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) said he has “grave questions” about Flynn’s honesty — or whether other White House officials were aware of those discussions.

    “If this new report is true, we need to ask not only whether General Flynn should be leading our national security efforts, but whether he should even hold a security clearance,” Cummings said in a statement….

  219. says

    Trump’s tweet shows that he read (or had someone read to him),…

    You’ll be shocked, I’m sure, to learn that the passage was highlighted on Morning Joe minutes before Trump tweeted about it.

  220. says

    Correction to comment 293.

    Trump didn’t read the Lawfare post. He listened to a report on Morning Joe that was essentially a hack job, that was misleading journalism. That’s why Trump didn’t get to the point of the Lawfare post, which was “The Ninth Circuit is correct to leave the TRO in place.”

    Trump also missed out on the part where the blog post characterized his executive order in unflattering terms: “[…] “the incompetent malevolence with which this order was promulgated.”

    “Incompetent malevolence” is an excellent description for the actions of Trump and his minions.

  221. says

    The Republican Party has joined Trump in dissing the judicial system:

    @GOP
    We stand with @POTUS. Do you? #9thcircuit

    WTF?

    What about that pesky Constitution, Grand Old Party of rightwing dunderheads?

  222. says

    Watch the weekly roundup from Think Progress of the lies the Trump administration told during this past week.

    Think Progress puts together a video of the lies once a week. It’s a lot to fit into one 5:38-minute video, 19 lies this time. Short debunking of each lie is included.

  223. says

    SC @300, Republicans everywhere are running from protestors.

    In other news, this is a followup to comment 144. After the Republican critters in the House voted to eliminate the Election Assistance Commission, more people are pushing back.

    […] “Essentially what you’re taking is one of the few agencies in the federal government that actually functions properly,” Colorado’s Republican Secretary of State Wayne Williams told ThinkProgress.

    “They’ve done a very good job… I specifically favor and have voted in favor of continuing the EAC.”

    After the last national election was plagued with foreign interference, many elections chiefs noted that Congress’ move is poorly timed. They said they have relied on the agency’s expertise on voting technology and security, and they have benefited from its guidelines for updating voting equipment. […]

    Four state elections chiefs — from California, Colorado, Virginia, and Rhode Island—told ThinkProgress they do not support the EAC Termination Act.

    “It would be a big loss and a big setback to election administration to get rid of the EAC,” said Edgardo Cortés, Virginia’s nonpartisan elections commissioner. “It still has a very important purpose and we should focus on making that agency stronger and how we can improve it instead of getting rid of it and leaving state and local elections administrators without that resource.”

    Cortés and California Secretary of State Alex Padilla both said that they are concerned about cybersecurity issues, and that it’s helpful to have a bipartisan, elections-focused group like the EAC at the table with the Department of Homeland Security when the government is looking into how to protect voting systems from outside influence.

    “The timing couldn’t be worse,” Padilla told ThinkProgress. “There is genuine concern about the integrity of our elections.” […]

    Link

  224. says

    This is a followup to comments 272, 282, 289, 291, and 294.

    There is no doubt that Flynn lied, and there is no doubt that he discussed sanctions with Russian officials. This excerpt is from the Washington Post report:

    […] the Post story—which was based on interviews with nine current or former officials at security and law enforcement agencies—suggests that Flynn is not honest and not smart. […]

    All of those officials said ­Flynn’s references to the election-related sanctions were explicit. Two of those officials went further, saying that Flynn urged Russia not to overreact to the penalties being imposed by President Barack Obama, making clear that the two sides would be in position to review the matter after Trump was sworn in as president.

    “Kislyak was left with the impression that the sanctions would be revisited at a later time,” said a former official.

    A third official put it more bluntly, saying that either Flynn had misled Pence or that Pence misspoke. An administration official stressed that Pence made his comments based on his conversation with Flynn. The sanctions in question have so far remained in place.

    From journalist David Corn of Mother Jones:

    […] Last month, Pence declared there had been no contact between the Trump campaign and Russia. “Of course not,” he said. “Why would there be any contact between the campaign? This is all a distraction, and it’s all part of a narrative to delegitimatize the election and to question the legitimacy of [Trump’s] presidency.” But when Flynn was talking to Kislyak prior to the election, he was a senior campaign aide and surrogate for Trump. Pence was peddling a falsehood. And this raises the question: Why was Trump’s top national security aide talking to Russia while Moscow was attacking the US election to help Trump? What was he signaling to Moscow? What was he being told?

    This is a scandal. A real scandal. A big scandal. Republicans and Democrats should be screaming for investigations and public hearings. […] And Flynn should be booted. The evidence is strong that he lied and that he cozied up to Moscow while it was assaulting American democracy. Worse, for a supposed national security maven, he acted in a stupid manner and practiced awful tradecraft. Placing the nation’s security in his hands of a dishonest and reckless fellow is risky business. […]

    Will we finally see Flynn’s dismissal?

  225. says

    Update to comment 304: Representative Adam Schiff, a Democrat from California, and a member of the House Intelligence Committee, has called for Flynn’s dismissal.

    The allegation that General Flynn, while President Obama was still in office, secretly discussed with Russia’s ambassador ways to undermine the sanctions levied against Russia for its interference in the Presidential election on Donald Trump’s behalf, raises serious questions of legality and fitness for office. If he did so, and then he and other Administration officials misled the American people, his conduct would be all the more pernicious, and he should no longer serve in this Administration or any other.

  226. says

    Rightwing responses to the court decision not to reinstate Trump’s Muslim ban:

    Fox’s Sean Hannity: Sadly The Democrats And Unaccountable Judges Are Willing To Gamble With The Lives Of The American People. This Will Not Stand. This is all part of the alt radical lefts plan to undermine @POTUS @realDonaldTrump. “Judge shopping”

    American Spectator’s Matthew Vadum: The Ninth Circuit hates America. These vile politicians in black robes should be impeached and removed. They are pro-terrorist activists.

    “Alt-Right” Figure Mike Cernovich: Today’s ruling is unlawful, has no baisis in the Constitution, and is pure judicial activism.

    Daily Wire’s Ben Shapiro: JUDICIAL TYRANNY: 5 Biggest Legal Stupidities In The Ninth Circuit’s Decision To Stop Trump’s Executive Order

    Fox’s Greg Gutfeld: My Sense: The Court Chose Their Emotional Need For Popularity Over Your Real Security. Ban = Mean; Rejecting Ban = Cool. judge ruling ignores security; indulges media/academia/enternainment troika. theylll be played by damon and affleck in miniseries.

    MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough: I’ve read the Ninth’s decision. They’re lucky they won’t have to read Justice Scalia’s reversal of their opinion. It would be brutal.

    Okay, then. That’s the kind of thinking we are fighting against. It’s scary.

  227. says

    Seth Meyers called out Kellyanne Conway for hawking Ivanka Trump’s products. Meyers also mocked Trump for his incompetence in several areas, including a lack of attention to daily intelligence briefings, threatening legislators in Texas (“We’ll destroy his career.”), attacks on the free press (murder rate lies from Trump) etc.

    Scroll down for the video. 10:38 minutes. Excerpt below:

    [….] “From now on, the only network Kellyanne Conway should be allowed on is QVC,” joked Meyers.

    “And incidentally, before you take Conway’s advice and run out and buy Ivanka Trump’s products, you might want to consider that some of her scarves were recalled last year because they do not meet the federal flammability standards for clothing textiles posing a burn risk,” he added. “Of course, those were the old flammability standards. I’m sure they’ll be looser in a Trump administration.”

    Indeed, Ivanka’s scarves were recalled in April of last year over those concerns.

    They were also made in China.

  228. a_ray_in_dilbert_space says

    Lynna: “Okay, then. That’s the kind of thinking we are fighting against. It’s scary.”

    Calling it “thinking” is rather charitable. I’ve had hiccups with more thought behind them.

  229. says

    Tom Price was confirmed as Health and Human Services Secretary. Wonkette covered the import of this confirmation well:

    […] Price is extremely anti-choice. […] He’s got a zero rating from Planned Parenthood, and as a congressman he co-sponsored two “Right To Life” bills meant to ban both abortion and emergency contraception, because he believes fertilized eggs are human beings. Twice, he’s voted for the Pain Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, which would have made abortion illegal after 20 weeks! […]

    So he’s for sure coming for your abortions! That is not in question. The entire Trump administration is coming for your abortions. He is also a vocal opponent of the ACA, which the whole administration is coming for as well.

    But he is ALSO gonna be coming for your birth control. Because if there is anything that Tom Price hates as much as he hates abortion, it is birth control. Especially subsidized birth control and birth control that is covered by insurance!

    He hates it so much that he thinks your boss should be able to fire you if you or your partner uses it! Can you even imagine hating sex that much? […]

    Price told ThinkProgress in an interview:

    Bring me one woman who has been left behind. Bring me one. There’s not one. The fact of the matter is, this is a trampling of religious freedom and religious liberty in this country. The president does not have the power to say that your First Amendment rights go away. That’s wrong.

    Ahahaha! Poor people don’t exist! That is just silly! All the women in this country can afford birth control. Tom Price knows all the women and what they can afford.

    Except the really weird thing is — after the ACA birth control requirement was enacted, the abortion rate went down. Why? Because more women had access to birth control and therefore had fewer unintended pregnancies. [chart at the link]

    […] he also wants to totally eliminate all Title X funding. Birth control provided to low-income women through Title X funding prevents an estimated 1.94 million pregnancies a year, and seeing as how about 4 million babies are born a year, this would result in a 50% increase in our population. 2 million more babies a year, born to women who cannot even afford birth control. That should work out nicely!

    Not to mention that Title X doesn’t just fund birth control — it also funds “education and counseling, breast and pelvic exams, breast and cervical cancer screening, screenings and treatment for sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) and Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), education about preventing STDs and HIV and counseling for affected patients, referrals to other health care resources, pregnancy diagnosis, and pregnancy counseling.” […]

    What is even more fun is that Tom Price belongs to a medical group that does not believe in vaccines. Donald Trump does not believe in vaccines either. So not only are we going to have lots more babies born, possibly to people with untreated STIs (syphilis is just GREAT for your unborn baby), that will also be unvaccinated. […]

  230. says

    a_ray @308, you’re right. It’s more of a refusal-to-think syndrome.

    In other news, Bashar al-Assad is now on the “fake news” bandwagon. He said that the Amnesty International Torture Report was “fake news.” That’s a Trumpian approach.

    “You can forge anything these days,” Assad said when asked about a new Amnesty International report estimating that between 5,000 and 13,000 prisoners were killed in a “calculated campaign of extrajudicial execution” at a military prison outside of Damascus between 2011 and December 2015. “We are living in a fake news era.”

  231. a_ray_in_dilbert_space says

    Lynna,
    I’ve seen interviews of Assad, and the scary thing is that I almost think he believes the crap he is spewing. He’s approaching Nixon-praying-with-Kissinger levels of crazy.

  232. says

    Donald Trump did not wear his translation earpiece while the Prime Minister of Japan was speaking at the White House today. Trump nodded along as if he understood. Maybe he knows all the best Japanese words?

  233. says

    a_ray @313, I think people like Assad and Trump lie to themselves first. They convince themselves that they are telling the truth. You are right. They believe the crap they spew.

    In other news, Trump announced that he is planning to take more action “with regards to security” while the appeal on his immigration ban is working its way through the courts. He also spewed a bunch of receptive crap about how urgently his actions are needed because we are all in imminent danger. He believes that he is in imminent danger. Link

    We are going to keep our country safe. We are going to do whatever is necessary to keep our country safe. We had a decision which we think we’ll be very successful with—it shouldn’t have taken this much time, because safety is a primary reason, one of the reasons I’m standing here today, the security of our country, the voters felt I would give it the best security. We’ll be doing something very rapidly having to do with additional security for our country. You’ll be seeing that sometime next week. In addition we will continue to go through the court process, and I have no doubt we’ll win that particular case.

  234. says

    Republicans demonstrated their cynicism and their inner need to help banks at the expense of bank customers.

    […] Georgia Republican Sen. David Perdue introduced a resolution in Congress, alongside other Republicans including his fellow Georgian Johnny Isakson, to throw out a new package of rules for the prepaid debit card industry.

    The rules, finalized by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau in October, include limitations on overdraft fees, which have become a significant source of consumer complaints about the financial industry — and an important revenue stream for Georgia-based financial firm Total System Services, whose NetSpend unit is the country’s largest manager of prepaid cards […]

    Lauren Saunders, associate director of the National Consumer Law Center, said reversing the rules will be an example of “members of Congress that support Wall Street and predatory lenders over working families.”

    “It is outrageous that Congress may block basic fraud protections on prepaid cards so that NetSpend can keep gouging struggling families with overdraft fees,” Saunders said in a statement. […]

    A payment industry lobby group, the Electronic Transactions Association, has been pushing Congress to overturn the overdraft rules, and in December, the group wrote to congressional leaders asking them to “consider including repeal” of the rules via the fast-track CRA process. […]

    https://www.buzzfeed.com/matthewzeitlin/republicans-are-moving-to-scrap-rules-on-overdraft-charges

    The CRA, or Congressional Review Act, provides a way for simple majorities in both houses of Congress to eliminate a recently-finalized regulation (finalized less than 60 legislative days ago). A lot of Obama’s relatively recent regulations will be reversed using the CRA.

  235. says

    From Paul Krugman:

    […] We’re only three weeks into the Trump administration, but it’s already clear that any hopes that Mr. Trump and those around him would be even slightly ennobled by the responsibilities of office were foolish. Every day brings further evidence that this is a man who completely conflates the national interest with his personal self-interest, and who has surrounded himself with people who see it the same way. And each day also brings further evidence of his lack of respect for democratic values. […]

    The really striking thing about Mr. Trump’s Twitter tirade, however, was his palpable eagerness to see an attack on America, which would show everyone the folly of constraining his power:

    Just cannot believe a judge would put our country in such peril. If something happens blame him and court system. People pouring in. Bad!

    Never mind the utter falsity of the claim that bad people are “pouring in,” or for that matter of the whole premise behind the ban. What we see here is the most powerful man in the world blatantly telegraphing his intention to use national misfortune to grab even more power. And the question becomes, who will stop him? […]

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/10/opinion/when-the-fire-comes.html

  236. says

    More rightwingers are urging Trump to defy court orders. Here is an excerpt from a rant by Pat Buchanan:

    […] When politicians don black robes and seize powers they do not have, they should be called out for what they are – usurpers and petty tyrants. And if there is a cause upon which the populist right should unite, it is that elected representatives and executives make the laws and rule the nation. Not judges, and not justices. […]

    Consider. Secularist justices de-Christianized our country. They invented new rights for vicious criminals as though criminal justice were a game. They tore our country apart with idiotic busing orders to achieve racial balance in public schools. They turned over centuries of tradition and hundreds of state, local and federal laws to discover that the rights to an abortion and same-sex marriage were there in Madison’s Constitution all along. We just couldn’t see them.

    Trump has warned the judges that if they block his travel ban, and this results in preventable acts of terror on American soil, they will be held accountable. As rightly they should.

    Meanwhile, Trump’s White House should use the arrogant and incompetent conduct of these federal judges to make the case not only for creating a new Supreme Court, but for Congress to start using Article III, Section 2, of the Constitution – to restrict the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, and to reclaim its stolen powers.

    A clipping of the court’s wings is long overdue.

    The quote text is from WorldNetDaily, to which I do not link.

  237. says

    SC @288, I’m sure you saw Rachel Maddow present the results of the new PPP poll which showed that 51% of Trump voters think he should be able to ignore (or somehow do away with) court rulings with which he disagrees. Lawless is right.

    I did. I’m paying special attention to the rapidly rising percentage that want to see Trump impeached – from 35% to 40% (as I cited above @ #83) to 46% in just a few weeks. (There’s now an even split 46%/46% pro and against impeachment as Maddow noted.) 46%!

  238. says

    Oh, FFS. Trump is still obsessed with delusional voter fraud theories. He is deranged in some way.

    […] On Thursday, during a meeting with 10 senators that was billed as a listening session about Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch, the president went off on a familiar tangent, suggesting again that he was a victim of widespread voter fraud, despite the fact that he won the presidential election.

    As soon as the door closed and the reporters allowed to observe for a few minutes had been ushered out, Trump began to talk about the election, participants said, triggered by the presence of former New Hampshire Sen. Kelly Ayotte, who lost her reelection bid in November and is now working for Trump as a Capitol Hill liaison, or “Sherpa,” on the Supreme Court nomination of Judge Neil Gorsuch.

    The president claimed that he and Ayotte both would have been victorious in the Granite State if not for the “thousands” of people who were “brought in on buses” from neighboring Massachusetts to “illegally” vote in New Hampshire.

    According to one participant who described the meeting, “an uncomfortable silence” momentarily overtook the room. […]

    Politico link

  239. says

    “US investigators corroborate some aspects of the Russia dossier”:

    For the first time, US investigators say they have corroborated some of the communications detailed in a 35-page dossier compiled by a former British intelligence agent, multiple current and former US law enforcement and intelligence officials tell CNN. As CNN first reported, then-President-elect Donald Trump and President Barack Obama were briefed on the existence of the dossier prior to Trump’s inauguration.

    None of the newly learned information relates to the salacious allegations in the dossier. Rather it relates to conversations between foreign nationals. The dossier details about a dozen conversations between senior Russian officials and other Russian individuals. Sources would not confirm which specific conversations were intercepted or the content of those discussions due to the classified nature of US intelligence collection programs.

    But the intercepts do confirm that some of the conversations described in the dossier took place between the same individuals on the same days and from the same locations as detailed in the dossier, according to the officials. CNN has not confirmed whether any content relates to then-candidate Trump.

    The corroboration, based on intercepted communications, has given US intelligence and law enforcement “greater confidence” in the credibility of some aspects of the dossier as they continue to actively investigate its contents, these sources say….

    A “senior White House official” is now saying they won’t take the travel ban case to the Supreme Court.

    Eliot Engel, the ranking member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, is calling for Flynn to be fired.

  240. says

    Followup to comment 320.

    About that awkward silence, (even from supporters), when Trump brings up his voter fraud theories, Steve Benen put it this way:

    […] He doesn’t understand the silence, so he keeps raising ridiculous assertions, which he appears to sincerely believe, despite the growing gap between his ideas and our reality.

    It’s an uncomfortable subject, but the need for an awkward national conversation is growing more apparent.

    Chris Hayes on “All In” is the one who called Trump’s assertions “deranged.”

  241. says

    SC @323, I think Wolf Blitzer is sometimes slow off the mark. And sometimes I think he waits for a journalist who is more adept at summarizing the importance of a new finding to do the hard work, and then he uses that.

    I think the main point is that confidence in the reliability of the dossier has increased.

    Response from the White House:

    Reached for comment this afternoon, White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer said, “We continue to be disgusted by CNN’s fake news reporting.”

    Spicer later called back and said, “This is more fake news. It is about time CNN focused on the success the President has had bringing back jobs, protecting the nation, and strengthening relationships with Japan and other nations. The President won the election because of his vision and message for the nation.”

    Hahahaha. That’s a sure sign that the news hits a sore spot in the Trump administration, hits a weak spot and makes them nervous.

  242. says

    Oh, boy …. yet more trouble for Republicans and their efforts to dismantle the Affordable Care Act.

    An Oregon-based insurer scored a $214 million court victory this week in a case brought after congressional Republicans in 2014 hobbled the federal government’s ability to fund an Affordable Care Act program.

    The program, known as risk corridors payments, sought to blunt some of the risk insurers were taking on in the first three years of Obamacare’s implementation. The program shifted money from insurers that over-performed on expectations to those that underperformed. However, GOP lawmakers inserted an amendment in must-pass legislation barring the government from drawing funding for the program from elsewhere in the Department of Health and Human Services to make up any shortfalls between the money collected from insurers and the money owed. […]

    As a result, insurers, on average, have received around 12 percent of the payments they have been owed.

    A U.S. Court of Claims ruled Thursday that the feds had “breached the contract by failing to make full risk corridors payments as promised,” and handed over to the Oregon insurance company Moda the $214 million summary judgement:

    There is no genuine dispute that the Government is liable to Moda. Whether under statute or contract, the Court finds that the Government made a promise in the risk corridors program that it has yet to fulfill. Today, the Court directs the Government to fulfill that promise. After all, “to say to [Moda], ‘The joke is on you. You shouldn’t have trusted us,’ is hardly worthy of our great government.” Brandt v. Hickel, 427 F.2d 53, 57 (9th Cir. 1970).

    In effect an attack against the ACA Republicans launched under President Obama is now a mess that President Trump’s administration will need to clean up. […]

    Link

  243. says

    This is a followup to comment 320.

    In that same meeting, trump called Senator Elizabeth Warren “Pocahontas” again.

    In other news: SC @319, yes, those numbers for against impeachment of Trump are, to use a trumpism, very important, very very important.

    In that same poll, some questions related to Black History Month were asked.

    […] only 47% of Trump supporters polled knew that Frederick Douglass is dead! And yet, 45% of them don’t so much think we need a Black History Month. […]

    46% of Trump supporters polled would really love there to be a White History Month. Which there are already many of. The whole rest of the year, in fact, some say! But also there is Jewish-American Heritage month in May, Polish-American AND Italian-American Heritage in October, Irish-American Heritage month in March… and those are all kinds of white people. Unless you’re like a really, really specific racist of the “Aryan people only!” variety.

    But hey! Even they have Confederate History Month, which is celebrated in April.

    Tragically, the poll did not ask supporters how exactly they wanted to celebrate White History Month, because I think that’s a thing the people have a right to know. Quite frankly, I think there absolutely should be a White History Month, if only so we can all watch them celebrate it. Admit it — it would be hilarious. […]

    only 7% of voters think Donald Trump should invade Mexico. Which is maybe the most heartening thing anyone will read all week. Good for you, America!

    Link

  244. says

    China is trolling Trump on Twitter:

    In a phone call with #XiJinping, #Trump agreed to honor #oneChinapolicy, though he had publicly challenged it. What has changed his mind?

    Blackmailing didn’t work

    China’s unyielding stance

    Pressure from within U.S.

    Ivanka and Arabella

  245. says

    “Federal agents conduct sweeping immigration enforcement raids in at least 6 states”:

    U.S. immigration authorities launched a series of raids, traffic stops and checkpoints in at least half a dozen states across the country on Thursday and Friday, sweeping up an unknown number of undocumented immigrants, immigration lawyers and advocates said.

    The raids, which appeared to target scores of undocumented immigrants, including those without criminal records, mark the first largescale episode of immigration enforcement inside the United States since President Trump’s Jan. 26 order to crack down on the estimated 11 million immigrants living here illegally.

    It also appeared to signal a departure from the Obama administration’s prioritized immigration enforcement against criminals. Trump has pledged to deport up to 3 million undocumented immigrants with criminal records….

  246. microraptor says

    Lynna @ 311:

    That’s actually a photoshop of Rosie’s face on Spicer’s body. There are some larger pictures of it available and it’s easier to see the change in skin tone on them.

  247. militantagnostic says

    But also there is Jewish-American Heritage month in May, Polish-American AND Italian-American Heritage in October, Irish-American Heritage month in March… and those are all kinds of white people. Unless you’re like a really, really specific racist of the “Aryan people only!” variety.

    And is there an Aryan history month? Looks the “alt right” has a point. /sarc

  248. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    Chris Hayes if finally getting his town hall event in Chicago about their troubles like number of murders on MSNBC.

  249. says

    Right hand does not know what the left hand is doing:

    […] A White House official said Friday that the administration is not currently planning to appeal to the Supreme Court, though it will keep up the broader battle against a lawsuit challenging the executive order.

    But White House chief of staff Reince Priebus subsequently said that the administration is still considering an appeal to the Supreme Court.

    Administration officials are also reportedly considering scrapping the old executive order and writing a new one that can pass legal muster. […]

    Link

  250. says

    .

    TrumPutin is deleting tweets.

    I’m pretty sure that’s illegal now that he’s POTUS, even if it’s his personal twitter account, which he shouldn’t be tweeting from anyways. He doesn’t yet grasp that he’s actually president and therefor has rules he’s supposed to follow, but yeah, go ahead and lock up Hillary for doing something that every SOS did before her.

  251. says

    follow up to 342: The punishment for violating the Presidential Records Act of 1978:

    Because Presidential records are official records of the United States, a person found to have destroyed them illegally may be imprisoned for up to three years and is prohibited from holding any office in the United States government.

    Above quote from the Forbes article I linked in 342.

    LOCK HIM UP! LOCK HIM UP!

  252. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    Seeing something totally unacceptable. Ads promoting Gorsuch for SCOTUS. If you must advertise for him, he is, like Trump the con man, unacceptable. Period, end of story.

  253. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    Who the hell is actually advertising something like that?

    I don’t know, and I presume some RWA PAC. But they were on MSNBC. Very disturbing.

  254. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    Microraptor, a quick search showed both ads for and against Gorsuch
    For
    Against
    Unseemly both ways.
    Personally, it Gorsuch can’t distinguish between a real person, and the pseudo fictional person that is a corporation, he is automatically disqualified from consideration for SCOTUS. You may have other criteria, one way or the other.

  255. says

    Rachel Maddow reported on this last night: ICE lied to the public and CA officials about its raids this week.

    Regarding Linda Sarsour, I haven’t followed the claims and counterclaims (I’ve found that in these situations the allegations typically turn out to be bullshit or at least grossly misleading and partial), but I’ve seen her on TV for a while now and she’s always seemed to be associated with and speaking for progressive causes (including the Women’s March). It’s simply a fact that what sharia means to different people and groups varies widely, and that there are multiple aspects of sharia law, so just connecting the term to a person offers little in the way of useful information about them. Many attacks on progressives in my experience seem to boil down to the fact that they’re Muslims, and therefore somehow linked to the most rightwing Muslims. But just as I wouldn’t say that the woman speaking at my link @ #279 is responsible for Bryan Fischer because she’s a Christian, I see no reason to consider Linda Sarsour or Keith Ellison suspect because of their religion.* I get the sense that people think progressive Muslims can’t really exist. The article is very short on information about Sarsour’s specific beliefs. It suggests that she’s “an apologist for hard Islamist ideas” and “a religiously conservative veiled Muslim woman, embracing a fundamentalist worldview requiring women to ‘modestly’ cover themselves.” I’ve seen no evidence in support of those claims and much evidence to the contrary. Even if she has some views that I disagree with – and I assume she does – that wouldn’t disqualify her from a leadership position in the movement. But I’ve yet to see any engagement with her actual views, and if she’s not interested in being interrogated about her beliefs I think that’s understandable – I’ll continue to base my view of what she stands for on her statements, actions, and associations.

    * (Well, particularly suspect. I regard religious faith as inherently reactionary.)

  256. says

    +1 on SC’s 352. krsone, your post boils down to “but SHARI’AH” shouted over and over. Personally, I don’t care if she wears a full-on Afghani burqa, if she’s a feminist then she stands up for the right of women to choose, just as I do. That she chooses hijab doesn’t make her a bad feminist any more than my wearing makeup sometimes does me.

    Besides, at this point I’d stand up beside any Muslim, because dividing us along those lines serves only the tangeriney Mussolini and his friends. So no, I’ll not be judging Ms Sansour based on one comment; I’ll mind her behaviour (so far, impeccable) and where she stands (with us progressives, as yet).

  257. says

    “CIA freezes out top Flynn aide”:

    A top deputy to National Security Adviser Michael Flynn was rejected for a critical security clearance, effectively ending his tenure on the National Security Council and escalating tensions between Flynn and the intelligence community.

    The move came as Flynn’s already tense relationships with others in the Trump administration and the intelligence community were growing more fraught after reports that Flynn had breached diplomatic protocols in his conversations with the Russian ambassador to the United States….

  258. says

    “FEC commissioner asks Trump for voter fraud evidence”:

    A Federal Elections Commission commissioner called on President Donald Trump Friday to substantiate his claim of massive voter fraud in New Hampshire.

    Trump alleged in a White House meeting earlier this week that illegal voters from Massachusetts successfully voted in New Hampshire en masse, three sources familiar with the meeting have told CNN.

    In a statement calling the claim “astonishing,” FEC Commissioner Ellen Weintraub said, “The scheme the President of the United States alleges would constitute thousands of felony criminal offenses under New Hampshire law.”…

  259. says

    It’s certainly possible that Flynn outright lied to Pence, but we shouldn’t forget that Pence himself is a practiced and shameless liar and was throughout the campaign. He lied and lied and lied during the VP debate (the news shows chose to focus on Kaine interrupting him rather than the mendacity on display), and he didn’t stop lying after the election or inauguration.

  260. says

    “Justice Department Takes A Step Back From Effort To Protect Transgender People Under Existing Law”:

    The Justice Department took a step back Friday from its prior position of advancing transgender people’s rights under existing civil rights laws.

    On just the second day of Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ tenure at the helm of the Justice Department, the federal government filed a notice in the lawsuit Texas and other states had brought against the Obama administration’s pro-transgender policies.

    The moves taken in the filing — a joint filing made with the states — suggest that the federal government’s position on the pending legal questions surrounding transgender people’s rights could be changing soon. At the least, it suggests the new administration is pulling back while it determines the position it will be taking in the case.

    Nonetheless, despite the Justice Department move, the EEOC — an independent federal agency — appeared to be keeping its fight for the pro-transgender interpretation of the law proceeding in court.

    The agency filed a brief on Friday making its case to the US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit….

  261. says

    Lynna – Can we get krsone muted in this thread? I don’t want his trolling to ruin what I view as an awesome one stop shop and central repository for all of the crap this administration has been up to.

  262. says

    I think that if your principles are women’s rights, LBGTQ rights, and freedom from oppression in general you need to have people on your side who support those principles, not simply temporary allies against Trump.

    Here’s the mission statement of the Women’s March:

    The rhetoric of the past election cycle has insulted, demonized, and threatened many of us – immigrants of all statuses, Muslims and those of diverse religious faiths, people who identify as LGBTQIA, Native people, Black and Brown people, people with disabilities, survivors of sexual assault – and our communities are hurting and scared. We are confronted with the question of how to move forward in the face of national and international concern and fear.

    In the spirit of democracy and honoring the champions of human rights, dignity, and justice who have come before us, we join in diversity to show our presence in numbers too great to ignore. The Women’s March on Washington will send a bold message to our new government on their first day in office, and to the world that women’s rights are human rights. We stand together, recognizing that defending the most marginalized among us is defending all of us.

    We support the advocacy and resistance movements that reflect our multiple and intersecting identities. We call on all defenders of human rights to join us. This march is the first step towards unifying our communities, grounded in new relationships, to create change from the grassroots level up. We will not rest until women have parity and equity at all levels of leadership in society. We work peacefully while recognizing there is no true peace without justice and equity for all.

    As Sarsour was an organizer of the March, which also excluded groups opposed to reproductive rights, I’m assuming she supports those principles. Muslim women and LGBT people face a very complex situation, and can make mistakes just like all of us can in a struggle on multiple fronts. I would rather work with people who try to recognize and address intersecting lines of oppression and experience than those who marginalize or ignore some lines of oppression and experience to focus on others.

  263. says

    Sales of Ivanka Trump merchandise were down 32% at Nordstrom over the past FY, despite general sales being up.

    Jason Chaffetz is now claiming that the people at his town hall the other night were paid protesters:

    “You could see it online a couple days before, a concerted effort in part to just cause chaos,” he said, according to the Deseret News. “Democrats are in disbelief that they have nothing but flailing and screaming to deal with this.”

    Jon Favreau tweeted: “He needs to show evidence that this is true, or apologize” to his constituents.

  264. says

    erik @361

    Lynna – Can we get krsone muted in this thread? I don’t want his trolling to ruin what I view as an awesome one stop shop and central repository for all of the crap this administration has been up to.

    I feel your pain. I’ll alert PZ about krsone, but I don’t see a violation of the commenting rules … so far.

    krsone obviously has a single-issue obsession, a tendency to create false-equivalence scenarios from thin evidence, and is working hard to turn us all into krsone clones.

    SC @352, CaitieCat @353, and SC @366 provided great rebuttals and/or appeals to reason.

    My advice for now is that erik, and others who don’t wish to engage, should ignore krsone. Skip those krsone comments if that suits you best. We’ll keep a close watch on this.

  265. says

    Lynna @ 369 – Thanks for the response. I feel that’s fair. I just don’t want to see this particular thread be derailed because so far it has become such a useful repository.

  266. says

    I saw the ad that Nerd and others referenced up-thread. The ad that aired on MSNBC made use of a former Obama-administration employee to say that there’s nothing scary about Gorsuch. That ad tells me that Republicans are worried about his confirmation, that the Koch brothers have too much money to throw around (and maybe that Gorsuch is one thing they can support in the Trump swamp), and that the Supreme Court nomination is of paramount importance to the Koch brothers’ agenda.

    SC @ 368, I am so disappointed in Chaffetz. I know he is a doofus, and I’ve been appalled by many of his past actions, but I thought that a strong showing of disagreement from his own constituents would give him pause, would make him think.

    So the mormon news source, Deseret News, published a story in which Chaffetz says all those protestors were paid!? For shame, Chaffetz. BTW, online organization for attendance at a Town Hall meeting, or for a protest, is not evidence the protestors were paid. A lot of those protestors were probably mormons.

    From the comments below the Deseret article:

    So Sen Chaffetz confidently claimed that the anger displayed against him was because protestors were paid and shipped in from out of state? But when asked who paid them, he says “i don’t know, so some reporting.”

    Now that takes some guts! Make something up to avoid accountability, lie to the press, and when asked for evidence to support your lie, tell the press it’s their job to go find the non existent evidence! […]
    ————-
    “Out of State paid protestors brought in!”

    Is this another alternative fact or let’s see some facts to verify this outrageous claim.

    This seems like President Trump’s claim that three million illegals voted for Hillary.

    I am still waiting for evidence to support that wild claim.

    The only staged theateractical event with paid actors that I remember was a casting company was employed to provide enthusiastic people for a crowd when Trump announced his candidacy for the president .

    I guess we have selective memory no one else remember that event? [posted by “Iron Rod,” a reference to the Book of Mormon.]
    ——————–
    So i think i understand.. if protesters are against Republicans, they’re professional, paid protesters. If they’re pro-republican, then they’re an organic, patriotic expression of first amendment rights. If news or polls are unflattering to the president, it’s fake news. If it’s conducive to Republican messaging, it’s good, honest reporting.

    I’m sorry people thought the protesters weren’t civil enough. I also think some level of respect should be paid a sitting senator. I also think it’s incredibly dishonest and dismissive for Sen Chaffetz to suggest any criticism of his no-presidential-oversight agenda must be artificial, as if to say “how could any good Utahn possibly criticize me?” It’s easy, Senator. Please do your job.

  267. says

    McKay Coppins on the Chaffetz town hall:

    The raucous crowd of Utahans that booed Representative Jason Chaffetz off the stage Thursday night were, in many ways, a motley lot. Some were progressive organizers rallying against President Trump’s agenda; others were hunters and hippies who had come to sound off on the hot-button public lands debate; and a not-inconsiderable portion of the audience was made up of mild-mannered Mormons for whom protest culture was about as familiar as beer pong.

    But when it came time to chant, they all spoke in one voice: “Do your job! Do your job! Do your job!”

    In Utah, a place where industriousness and honest work are part of the DNA, these shouts carried a serious accusation….

    Several of the constituents who swarmed Chaffetz’s town hall Thursday night told me the backlash was not just about policy—it was also fueled by anger that the congressman was shirking his duty as chairman of the House Oversight Committee by refusing to investigate Trump. In their view, his was not just a failure of government, but of character.

    “This wasn’t about Chaffetz being a Republican … This was about Chaffetz straining at gnats for Hillary and Obama, and swallowing camels when it comes to Trump,” said Jeff Swift, a Mormon Democrat from South Jordan who helped organize opponents’ turnout at the town hall.

    “My read of the situation is that people here would have left Chaffetz largely alone if he hadn’t been so transparently bowing to Trump,” said Steve Evans, a Salt Lake City attorney and editor of By Common Consent, a popular liberal Mormon blog. “Before the election, Chaffetz had been vociferous about the morality of pursuing Clinton, so it’s viewed as hypocrisy that he now will do nothing with respect to Trump.”…

    This, from the article I linked to above, stood out:

    “I’ll never satisfy their desire to bring down Donald Trump. I’ll never satisfy that. It will never be good enough,” he told the paper.

    He provides no qualifications to this, so evidently regardless of whether there’s cause to go after Trump he won’t act. That’s an open refusal to do his job and in violation of the constitutional oath he took.

  268. says

    “Congress has a responsibility to engage with constituents”:

    The president versus the courts may be the top-billed fight in the constitutional crisis that began to unfold a few days after Donald Trump’s inauguration. But the Congress members versus the phones is a remarkable second-tier confrontation.

    The phones represent the hundreds of thousands of constituents bombarding Congress members in record numbers about the consequences of repeal of the Affordable Care Act, the nominations of Betsy DeVos, Scott Pruitt, and others to Trump’s Cabinet, or the presence of Steve Bannon in the White House and on the National Security Council.

    Several Republican members of Congress have fled town meetings to avoid these topics; others have canceled constituent meetings indefinitely or stopped answering their office phones. (Some constituents even resorted to sending faxes, when that was the last open channel to an office.) White House official Kellyanne Conway reportedly told members of Congress to ignore calls from the public and to follow her own measure of “Real Person Impact” instead.

    Having worked for a senator in the 1990s, ignoring the phones (or the emails, then a nascent form of political communication), or avoiding town meetings, is beyond comprehension….

    The phones have always been a blunt instrument, a clumsy and imperfect way for citizens to be heard. But now that embattled members of Congress have turned off the phones, they have more obligation than ever to find a better way to listen and to enable their constituents to be heard.

  269. says

    Commentary regarding Trump backing down and performing an about-face on China:

    […] The phrase bandied around after Trump’s Thursday night phone call with Chinese Communist Party Secretary Xi Jinping is “paper tiger.”

    James Zimmerman, the former head of the American Chamber of Commerce in China, told Reuters that Trump’s threatening to repudiate the one China policy and then backing down “confirmed to the world that he is a paper tiger . . . someone that seems threatening but is wholly ineffectual and unable to stomach a challenge.”

    The international affairs expert Shi Yanhong told The New York Times, “Trump lost his first fight with Xi and he will be looked at as a paper tiger,” while The Guardian headlined a piece about the call, “China U-turn is latest sign Trump may turn out to be a paper tiger.” […]

    https://www.chinafile.com/conversation/did-xi-just-outmaneuver-trump

  270. says

    SC @373, thanks for that additional info. Coppins has it right, in my opinion.

    […] a not-inconsiderable portion of the audience was made up of mild-mannered Mormons for whom protest culture was about as familiar as beer pong.

    I too noticed that Chaffetz told everyone that, no, he is not going to do his oversight job when it comes to Trump.

    Chaffetz’s belief that his constituents would not protest like that shows that he is completely out of touch with a significant number of his constituents. Get out of the bubble, Chaffetz.

  271. says

    Bernie Sanders made this statement on CNN:

    […] When you have a president who attacks people in the media who make critical remarks of him, which is what their job is, as providing “fake news,” when you have a president who attacks a judge who rules against him as a “so-called judge,” indicting the entire judiciary, clearly we have a president who does not understand what our constitution is about, what democracy is about. And I think there is a fear in this country of this nation under Trump moving into a more authoritarian mode. […]

  272. says

    Let’s check in with our President and see if he slept well and woke up cured of all the sound and fury signifying nothing in his head. Nope.

    Our legal system is broken! “77% of refugees allowed into U.S. since travel reprieve hail from seven suspect countries.” (WT) SO DANGEROUS!

    The “WT” is a reference to a dubious story in the Washington Times.

    And there’s this:

    Trump’s press corps has been placed in a basement suite at Jupiter golf club. Black plastic over windows to give Trump privacy as he golfs.

    https://twitter.com/JenniferJJacobs/status/830432228664602624

  273. says

    Yeah, “death panels” not working these days. (And his response to his constituents’ anger is sickening.)

    I read years and years ago, and always believed, that they have to fight like hell, with every lie in their arsenal, to keep any decent system of public healthcare from being implemented, because they know that once people have it they’ll want to keep it and have the experience to see through the lies.

  274. says

    Also from McKay Coppins:

    “Funny thing: the SLC Republican Party blasted out an email ahead of Chaffetz town hall urging “the REAL Utah majority” to show up.”

    “So, basically both the Repub Party and progressive groups tried to get people to the #ChaffetzTownhall. One side succeeded, the other failed.”

  275. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    Yeah, “death panels“. More like directives for care for terminal patients, which will include all of us at some point in time. It should be talked about.

  276. says

    Oh, FFS. Milk is the new, creamy symbol of white racial purity in Donald Trump’s America.

    At the Museum of the Moving Image in New York City on a Friday night, neo-Nazis and other trolls danced shirtless in front of a camera. The livestream setup had originally been established by actor Shia LaBeouf as an anti-Trump art installation. But the project has since become a broadcast outlet for white nationalism.

    Amid all the tattoos of Third Reich iconography bouncing around, one thing stood out: The neo-Nazis were all drinking milk. They spat it out as they danced, letting it dribble down their chins. […]

    So how did milk become a symbol of white pride?

    Some white supremacists think white ethnic identity has a geographic, historical correlation with the body’s tolerance for milk — specifically, the production of the lactase enzyme that allows humans to break down lactose. […]

    The discussion thread [on 4chan and 8chan] also contained references to seemingly benign academic studies of “Lactose tolerance in a Slavic population,” conversations about whether modern industry has tainted the purity of milk, and several milk-based poems about white pride. […] white racial purity is a fragile pseudo-science, so trying to find a sound explanation is a tall order […]

  277. says

    SC @380, and Nerd @383, that Republican dunderhead called his audience “children” for disagreeing with him. That’s the trumpian tactic of mocking those that disagree with you by labeling them as “children,” “weak,” etc.

    BTW, we have recently seen some children who are obviously braver and more intelligent than some elected Republicans. (SC @266)

    I really liked the way that audience did not let the speaker get away with the lie about “death panels.” A doctor in the audience explained that “death panels” is misleading.

  278. says

    This is interesting:

    Several outdoor gear companies followed Patagonia’s lead and announced Thursday and Friday that they would no longer attend the Outdoor Retailer shows in Salt Lake City to protest public-lands positions promoted by Utah’s elected officials, led by Gov. Gary Herbert.

    At the same time, some heavy hitters in the industry, including REI and The North Face, say they will continue to participate because they see a boycott as harmful to smaller companies. They support efforts by the Outdoor Industry Association to look for another city to host the lucrative conferences, which purport to bring 45,000 visitors and $40 million annually. […]

    Patagonia was the first to announce its boycott, tagging it to a resolution passed last week by the Utah Legislature and signed by Herbert, urging President Donald Trump to rescind Bears Ears. One day after Patagonia’s announcement, the Utah Senate approved a similar resolution seeking a reduction of Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument. Other companies have followed Patagonia’s lead. […]

    http://www.sltrib.com/home/4928444-155/more-companies-pull-out-of-outdoor

    Years ago, when I was promoting adventure travel books I had written, I attended the Outdoor Retailer show. That show was a really big deal for anyone marketing products to outdoor enthusiasts. It is a big deal when major corporations, like Patagonia, drop out.

    I think Chaffetz and other elected officials miscalculated badly when they decided to promote policies that would result in more extractive industry use on public lands, and even in selling off public lands.

  279. says

    Commentary regarding Trump backing down and performing an about-face on China:…

    In the past several days,

    – total retreat from tough talk on China
    – publicly thanked Japan for hosting US military after blustering during the campaign about how they should be paying
    – EU official says they’ll honor Iran deal after all after months of promising to withdraw
    – shifting and unclear policy on Israel/Palestine
    – tragically disastrous raid in Yemen
    – unprecedented number of leaks about the chaos and incompetence of the administration and how Trump isn’t remotely up to the job, reviving discussion of the 25th Amendment
    – daughter’s stuff pulled from shelves at Nordstrom after huge decline in sales, and other stores as well
    – SNL mockery struck a chord
    – top aide broke the law on live television
    – National Security Advisor caught in a stupid lie about possible criminal activity involving an adversarial government; investigations continue as more information surfaces
    – National Security Advisor’s deputy denied security clearance and removed from NSC
    – aspects of Steele memos confirmed; dossier gaining credibility among law enforcement
    – well behind schedule on filling cabinet and other important positions
    – executive orders shown to be poorly constructed
    – hilariously bad and rapidly declining poll numbers
    – protests growing
    – more loony claims about mass voter fraud called out by officials
    – more ignorant whining on Twitter
    – smacked down unanimously by appeals court on immigration ban; more tough talk before a decision has even been made

    Not exactly screaming tough, consistent, effective leadership, is it?

  280. says

    SC – Thank you so much for that summary. Can I repost that to FB with attribution? I only have like 67 friends lol. It’s my small circle of RL friends.

    It gives me a lot of optimism. I don’t think even Pence can now survive what’s coming.

  281. says

    Ha! This is quite funny. I hope Trump sees that a Dominican newspaper used a photo of Alec Baldwin imitating Trump instead of the Orange Dumpster himself to illustrate an article it published on Friday.
    Link

  282. says

    Reporters in Salt Lake City, (and others), are not letting Jason Chaffetz get away with claiming that the protestors at his town hall meeting were paid.

    From Eric Bradner: I was there and interviewed many members of the audience. None I spoke with were paid, and all I met were from Utah.

    From McKay Coppins: FWIW I spoke to around a dozen people for this story. All from Utah, most from his district.

    […]Utah state Rep. Marie Poulson (D-Cottonwood Heights) represents the area around the high school where the town hall was held. She told the Deseret News she believes almost all the protesters were local. […]

    https://thinkprogress.org/chaffetz-paid-protesters-town-hall-9f97e1f16d62#.xfo6r8lsd

  283. KG says

    Progressive Muslims exist. One famous example is Maajid Nawaz. – krsone@362

    Nope. Maajid Nawaz is almost as phoney as Walid Shoebat. His sole interest is the greater prosperity and glory of Maajid Nawaz. He was at one time a member of an extreme (although not provenly terrorist) Islamist group, Hizb ut-Tahrir. He now snuggles up to the Islamophobic right, including not only Sam Harris and Ayaan Hirsi Ali, but American neocon outfits such as the Koch brothers affiliated “Gen Next”, with which his Quilliam Foundation’s US offshoot shared an office (I don’t know if it still does), and Douglas Murray of the Henry Jackson Society, himself a chum of Pamela Geller and Richard Spencer.

  284. KG says

    Further to #397,
    Amusingly, in 2013 Nawaz was out-scammed by the British fascist Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, aka “Tommy Robinson”, one-time leader of the English Defence League. Nawaz’s Quillian Foundation apparently paid Robinson £2000 for the right to announce his abandonment of the EDL (which Robinson intended anyway, not because – as he pretended – he’d repented of his racist views, but because it was falling apart). Robinson has now joined Pegida, which has the same ideology.

  285. says

    MSNBC throughout the day has presented pro- and anti-reproductive rights protests as “dueling rallies,” but the commentary from reporters on the scene, pictures of the rallies, and statements from Planned Parenthood representatives all lead to the conclusion that pro-PP rallies are far larger. If that’s the case, objective journalism means reporting that fact. In any case, providing information about the relative size of the protests would be helpful.

  286. says

    Trump and his minions make lies seem true by repeating them.

    You only use 10 percent of your brain. Eating carrots improves your eyesight. Vitamin C cures the common cold. Crime in the United States is at an all-time high.

    None of those things are true.

    But the facts don’t actually matter: People repeat them so often that you believe them. Welcome to the “illusory truth effect,” a glitch in the human psyche that equates repetition with truth. Marketers and politicians are masters of manipulating this particular cognitive bias—which perhaps you have become more familiar with lately.

    President Trump is a “great businessman,” he says over and over again. Some evidence suggests that might not be true. Or look at just this week, when the president signed three executive orders designed to stop what he describes—over and over again—as high levels of violence against law enforcement in America. […] such crimes are at their lowest rates in decades, as are most violent crimes in the US. […]

    “President Trump intends to build task forces to investigate and stop national trends that don’t exist,” says Jeffery Robinson, deputy legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union. […] Every time the president tweets or says something untrue, fact-checkers race to point out the falsehood—to little effect. […]

    So what’s going on here? “Repetition makes things seem more plausible,” says Lynn Hasher, a psychologist at the University of Toronto whose research team first noticed the effect in the 1970s. “And the effect is likely more powerful when people are tired or distracted by other information.” […]

    “Slogans should be persistently repeated until the very last individual has come to grasp the idea,” he [Adolph Hitler] wrote in Mein Kampf.

    The effect works because when people attempt to assess truth they rely on two things: whether the information jibes with their understanding, and whether it feels familiar. […] familiarity can trump rationality—so much so that hearing over and over again that a certain fact is wrong can have a paradoxical effect. It’s so familiar that it starts to feel right.

    WIRED link

  287. says

    Reporters in Salt Lake City, (and others), are not letting Jason Chaffetz get away with claiming that the protestors at his town hall meeting were paid.

    If I were a local who attended/spoke, I would be furious, not just because it’s an offensive accusation but because it means he was just pretending to respect their concerns and really doesn’t give a shit about them.

  288. KG says

    SC@390,

    In a way it will be a pity if Trump’s state visit doesn’t happen – it would guarantee large demonstrations – possibly the biggest since the Iraq War, or even exceeding them* – and force the entire UK establishment to align themselves with or against Trump, who is massively disliked and despised here, even among much of the right. But if it fails to happen, that would itself be a considerable defeat for the May government.

    The article you link to also notes that there’s going to be a motion of no confidence – tabled by a Tory MP, James Dudderidge – in the House of Commons speaker, John Bercow, who has said he would veto an address to Parliament by Trump. This is unprecedented AFAIK. Bercow himself started out as a very right-wing Tory, but appears to have mellowed. Most of the Opposition parties will support Bercow – it will be interesting to see how the Tories split.

    *Although timing it in August or early September could also be a way of limiting their size – students will be away from college, many people will be away on holiday.

  289. KG says

    “Slogans should be persistently repeated until the very last individual has come to grasp the idea,” he [Adolph Hitler] wrote in Mein Kampf. – WIRED, quoted by Lynna, OM @400

    Another illusory truth, made plausible by frequent repetition: that Hitler spelled his first name “Adolph” ;-)

  290. says

    SC @399, I noticed that too. Not good.

    For example, about 500 anti-reproductive rights protestors showed up in St. Paul Minnesota. The pro-reproductive rights (and pro Planned Parenthood) protestors numbered about 5,000. In other words, pro-reproductive rights outnumbered anti-reproductive rights by a factor of 10.

    I guess we’ll have to report the news ourselves.

  291. says

    In a way it will be a pity if Trump’s state visit doesn’t happen – it would guarantee large demonstrations – possibly the biggest since the Iraq War, or even exceeding them* – and force the entire UK establishment to align themselves with or against Trump, who is massively disliked and despised here, even among much of the right. But if it fails to happen, that would itself be a considerable defeat for the May government.

    Oh, I was thinking it might not happen because he might not still be in office by then. (Which I know is wildly optimistic, but things do seem to be picking up steam.)

  292. says

    I hope Trump sees that a Dominican newspaper used a photo of Alec Baldwin imitating Trump instead of the Orange Dumpster himself to illustrate an article it published on Friday.

    Hee.

  293. says

    Good for Yale:

    Yale University is stripping the name of a 19th-century alumnus who was an ardent supporter of slavery from one of its residential colleges and renaming it for a more recent graduate, pioneering computer scientist and Navy Rear Admiral Grace Murray Hopper.

    The change comes after several years of debate over the ethics of having a college named for former Vice President John C. Calhoun, an 1804 Yale graduate who fought efforts to end slavery in the United States….

  294. says

    North Korea has fired a ballistic missile into the ocean.

    Yes. The stories – some of which were fairly implausible even if they’d been the only tale told – concerning the number of calls, timing of calls, subjects discussed, and so on changed constantly and conflicted.

  295. says

    For the record, while I think Joy Reid is a treasure, I thought her segment this morning with Malcolm Nance and Naveed Jamali talking about Edward Snowden was awful. The gleeful speculation that he would be in a Supermax prison was ghoulish. The idea that he was a spy who didn’t know he was a spy was absurd. The lack of concern that he could be handed over to fucking Trump – I’ve read Nance’s book, and know what he thinks of Trump and his entourage – was disgusting. The total failure of all involved to appreciate Snowden’s motives, methods, accomplishments, and courage was breathtaking. The whole tone of the segment was beneath my expectations for the show. Very disappointing.

  296. says

    SC, you may have to add the North Korean missile to your list @387 since Trump made a big deal out of saying that North Korea wouldn’t fire a ballistic missile while he is president.

  297. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    North Korea has fired a ballistic missile into the ocean.

    Any missile that goes downrange, even a hundred miles is a ballistic missile. SpaceX (well, SpaceX has recovered a few boosters), ESA, and UAL launch ballistic missiles all the time. Data is need as to the range of flight, and once orbit can be achieved, the payload can be dropped anywhere under the orbit.

  298. says

    Trump thinks the media has “abused” Ivanka.

    I am so proud of my daughter Ivanka. To be abused and treated so badly by the media, and to still hold her head so high, is truly wonderful!

    Doofus.

  299. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    Evidently the Trump Administration isn’t going to back transexaul rights.

    President Donald Trump’s administration is stepping back from a request made by the Obama administration in an ongoing lawsuit over bathroom rights for transgender students in public schools.
    In a filing Friday with the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, the federal government asked to withdraw a motion filed last year that asked a judge to scale back a temporary injunction blocking Obama administration guidance on the issue.
    The Department of Justice’s filing, which came a day after Jeff Sessions was sworn in as Trump’s attorney general, said the parties were “currently considering how best to proceed in this appeal.”
    Texas and 12 other states filed the lawsuit last year challenging the former president’s guidance, which directed public schools to allow transgender students to use bathrooms and locker rooms consistent with their gender identity.
    A federal judge temporarily blocked the directive nationwide in August. The Obama administration later requested that the hold only apply to the 13 suing states while it appealed the ruling. A hearing on the request was set for Tuesday, but the Friday court filing asked that the hearing be cancelled.
    Justice Department spokesman Peter Carr said Saturday afternoon that the agency declined to comment beyond the filing. Calls to the Texas attorney general’s office were not returned.
    Sarah Warbelow, legal director for the Human Rights Campaign, said they were “incredibly disappointed” by the filing on Friday.
    “Our concern is that it’s a very clear signal that at a minimum the Department of Justice — and possibly more broadly throughout the Trump administration — will not protect transgender students,” she said.

  300. says

    White House senior policy advisor Stephen Miller went on all the Sunday morning shows to repeat quite a few Trump administration lies.

    On NBC’s Meet the Press, Miller said,

    A district judge in Seattle cannot make immigration law for the United States, cannot give foreign nationals and foreign countries rights they do not have, and cannot prevent the President of the United States from suspending the admission of refugees from Syria. What the judges did, both at the 9th and at the district level, was to take power for themselves that belonged squarely in the hands of the President of the United States.

    We’ve heard a lot of talk about how all the branches of government are equal. That’s the point. They are equal. There’s no such thing as judicial supremacy.

    On ABC’s This Week, Miller said,

    Having worked before on a campaign in New Hampshire, I can tell you that this issue of bussing voters into New Hampshire is widely known by anyone who’s worked in New Hampshire politics. It’s very real, it’s very serious. This morning on this show is not the venue for me to lay out all the evidence.

    Go to New Hampshire, talk to anybody who’s worked in politics there for a long time. Everybody’s aware of the problem in New Hampshire […]

    If this is an issue that interests you, then we can talk about it more in the future. Many highly qualified people, like Kris Kobach, the Kansas secretary of state, have looked deeply into this issue and have confirmed it to be true and have put together evidence, and I suggest you invite Kris Kobach onto your show and he can walk you through some of the evidence of voter fraud in greater detail.

    OMFG, Kris Kobach as a reliable reference? Also, “This morning on this show is not the venue for me to lay out all the evidence” translates to “There is no evidence.”

    As Esme Cribb of Talking Points Memo noted:

    When Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach (R) filed his first criminal charges regarding alleged instances of double-voting in 2015, all three defendants were registered Republicans. A local prosecutor apparently declined to bring two of the three cases, and all three complaints lacked detail about the alleged double-voting involved.

    As George Stephanopoulos pointed out: “Just for the record, you have provided absolutely no evidence.”

    On Fox News Sunday, Miller said,

    The President’s powers here are beyond question.

    That was in reference to the executive order barring visitors from seven predominantly Muslim countries from entering the United States.

  301. says

    SC @424, here are a few adjectives for Republicans, adjectives (and nouns) I think have been under-used:
    craven
    vain
    villainous
    canker-blossom
    lout
    poisonous
    lily-livered
    brazen
    spineless
    gutless
    brutish
    mendacious
    foul
    dishonorable

    I’m sure I can come up with a few more later.

  302. says

    Melissa McCarthy returned to Saturday Night Live to reprise her impersonation of Sean Spicer.
    Excerpt:

    Yeah, I said that wrong when I said it. And then you wrote it, which makes you wrong! Because when I say something wrong, you guys should know what it is I’m meaning. You’re wrong! And that’s why you’re here. Obviously, I meant Orlanta!

    List of terrorist attacks:

    The Bowling Green massacre—not the Kellyanne one, the real one!
    The Horror at Six Flags
    The Slaughter at Fraggle Rock
    The Night They Drove Old Dixie Down

    Kate McKinnon appeared as Jeff Sessions. In a different sketch, McKinnon also reprised her role as Kellyanne Conway. I think she could present a devastating Stephen Miller as well. I hope she does.

    Slate Link

  303. says

    Josh Marshall posted a timeline of events that illuminate National Security Advisor Michael Flynn’s association with Trump and with Russian interference in the 2016 election. Marshall said the timeline is a work in progress.

    I’ll summarize part of the timeline. Visit the link for the full details.

    […] CSummer 2015: The US government alleges that Russian hackers first gain access to DNC computer networks.

    August 2015: Trump staff arranges first meeting between Trump and General Flynn […]

    August 8th, 2015: Roger Stone leaves formal role in Trump campaign. Whether he quits or was fired is disputed. […]

    December 10th, 2015: Michael Flynn attends conference and banquet in Moscow to celebrate the 10th anniversary of RT (formerly Russia today). […]

    March 21st, 2016: In a meeting with The Washington Post editorial board, Trump provides a list of five foreign policy advisors. The list includes Carter Page but not Michael Flynn. The list is Walid Phares, Carter Page, George Papadopoulos, Joe Schmitz, and ret. Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg.

    March 28th, 2016: Trump campaign hires Paul Manafort […]

    February-April 2016: […] January Flynn is mentioned as an advisor who has “regular interactions” with Trump. […]

    April 2016: DNC network administrators first notice suspicious activity on Committee computer networks in late April, 2016, according to The Washington Post. The DNC retains the services of network security firm Crowdstrike which expels hackers from the DNC computer network. Crowdstrike tells The Washington Post it believes hackers had been operating inside the DNC networks since the Summer of 2015.
    […]
    July 11th-12th, 2016: Trump campaign officials intervene to remove language calling for providing Ukraine with lethal aid against Russian intervention is Crimea and eastern Ukraine. […]

    July 12th, 2016: Official publication date, The Field of Fight by Michael Flynn and Michael Ledeen.

    July 22, 2016: Wikileaks releases first tranche of DNC emails […]

    July 27th, 2016: […] “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you can find the 33,000 emails that are missing. I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.”

    August 1st, 2016: Trump campaign chair Paul Manafort denies Trump campaign changed GOP platform on Russia and Ukraine.

    August 14th, 2016: The New York Times publishes story detailing handwritten ledgers showing “$12.7 million in undisclosed cash payments designated for Mr. Manafort from Mr. Yanukovych’s pro-Russian political party […]

    August 19, 2016: Paul Manafort resigns[…]

    September 26th, 2016: Trump Russia-Europe Policy Advisor Carter Page steps down from campaign while disputing allegations that he engaged in private communications with Russian government officials. […]

    September 26th, 2016: At first presidential debate, Donald Trump casts doubt on Russian role in hacking campaign: “It could be Russia, but it could also be China. It could also be lots of other people. It also could be somebody sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds.”

    October 7, 2016: A “Joint Statement from the Department of Homeland Security and Office of the Director of National Intelligence” officially accuses the Russian government of being behind hacking of the DNC “to interfere with the US election process.”

    October 7, 2016: Wikileaks releases first batch of Podesta emails – one hour after release of Access Hollywood Trump tape.

    October 12th, 2016: Stone says he has been in contact with Assange through an intermediary.

    October 30th, 2016: In response to FBI Director James Comey’s letter to Congress about new developments in the Clinton email server probe, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid writes a public letter to Comey in which he claims: “In my communications with you and other top officials in the national security community, it has become clear that you possess explosive information about close ties and coordination between Donald Trump, his top advisors, and the Russian government.”

    December 9th, 2016: Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) hand delivers a selection of memos (aka ‘the Steele dossier’) to FBI Director James Comey.

    December 29th, 2016: President Barack Obama outlines […] sanctions and expulsions of Russian diplomat in response to Russian efforts to interfere in the 2016 election.

    December 29th, 2016: Incoming National Security Michael Flynn has multiple phone conversations with Russian Sergey Kislyak. It is later reported that the calls covered US sanctions and suggestions that Obama’s punitive actions could be undone in a matter of weeks. […]

    January 19th, 2017: The New York Times reports that the FBI is leading an interagency task force probing ties between Russia and three close Trump associates: Paul Manafort, Carter Page and Roger Stone.

    Marshall’s caveat: “Of course, a timeline can create the impression of causation where none exists. It’s important to keep that in mind. Still, it’s helpful to get a lot of information in one place organized in time. It helps us bound what events can possibly be causally related as well as how they may or may not be related.”

  304. says

    How is Betsy Devos doing as head of the Department of Education? Perhaps we can judge from this:

    The Department of Education apologized on Sunday for misspelling W.E.B. Du Bois’ name in a tweet posted hours earlier — but its apology contained another misspelling.

    The Department of Education’s original tweet misspelled the surname of Du Bois—a black historian, sociologist, civil rights activist and co-founder of the NAACP—as “DeBois.” […]

    In its subsequent apology, the Department of Education misspelled the word “apologies” as “apologizes.” […]

    Link

  305. says

    Trump plays his mendacious card:

    I know Mark Cuban well. He backed me big-time but I wasn’t interested in taking all of his calls.He’s not smart enough to run for president!

    Mark Cuban backed Hillary Clinton, and he publicly questioned Trump’s claims of personal wealth.

    Cuban tweeted in response:

    LOL

  306. says

    This is a followup to comment 425.

    One thing Stephen Miller did not say is that Trump has confidence in Michael Flynn:

    […] “Does the President still have confidence in his national security advisor?” Chuck Todd asked Miller on NBC News’ “Meet the Press.”

    “That’s a question that I think you should ask the President, the question you should ask Reince, the chief of staff,” Miller said. “I’m here today as a policy advisor and my focus is on answering the policy questions that you have.”

    “So the White House did not give you anything to say other than that on General Flynn,” Todd said.

    “They did not give me anything to say,” Miller replied.

    “So you cannot say whether or not the President still has confidence in his national security advisor,” Todd pressed.

    “Asked and answered,” Miller interjected. “It’s not for me to tell you what’s in the President’s mind. That’s a question for the President, that’s a question for our chief of staff. Asked and answered.”

    “If you were caught misleading the Vice President of the United States, would be that be considered a fireable offense in the Trump White House?” Todd asked.

    “It’s not for me to answer hypotheticals, it wouldn’t be responsible, it’s a sensitive matter,” Miller said. “It would not be appropriate for me to speculate.” […]

    Link

    Yeah, right. Is the first indication that Trump is going to give Flynn the boot in an attempt to save himself?

  307. says

    Looks like the White House Correspondents Dinner will have all the star power of Trump’s inauguration.

    Nancy Pelosi’s “Statement on Reports of New Confirmations of Trump-Russia Dossier”:

    “Once again, I am calling on the FBI to investigate the financial, political and personal ties between President Donald Trump and Russia. The American people deserve the truth.

    “President Trump’s kowtowing to Vladimir Putin is endangering our national security and emboldening a dangerous tyrant. What do the Russians have on President Trump that he would flirt with lifting sanctions and weakening NATO?

    “The President and his National Security Advisor have given the Russians the impression that whatever they do, they are not to worry, because the Trump White House will not stand against their aggression. General Flynn should be suspended and have his intelligence clearance revoked until the facts are known about his secret contacts with the Russians.

    “Republicans should be just as alarmed as Democrats at the mortifying coziness the Trump Administration has shown with Putin. Congress must also launch an bipartisan, independent, outside commission to expose the full extent of Russia’s influence on the election and this Administration.”

    Various people, from Maxine Waters to Rick Wilson, have indicated on TV recently that they know Republican legislators who are extremely concerned about Trump and headed towards putting their foot down in the not-too-distant future. They seem pretty confident about this, although we’ve yet to see any public indications of a major shift.

  308. says

    SC @424, here are a few adjectives for Republicans, adjectives (and nouns) I think have been under-used:…

    “Villainous” is the one most often coming to mind these days. I hear about another despicable act and find myself – like I’m in a movie, locked in a cabin while the bad guys go off to carry out their nefarious scheme – saying “You won’t get away with this!”

  309. says

    Excerpt from an on-air statement by CNN’s Dan Pfeiffer:

    […] when you have the president of the United States using his massive, the massive bully pulpit, whether it’s on Twitter or on television interviews, to basically say things that are provably false on a regular basis, that is problematic. And then you now have this infrastructure on social media sites, these Breitbart, Lifezette, some of these new conservative outlets that have been set up to amplify some of those concerns, we live in sort of a world of alternative reality. And if you have a significant portion of the country believing in a, quote unquote, “alternative set of facts,” that’s not good for democracy. […]

    Excerpt from a statement made by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer on “Face the Nation” with CBS’ John Dickerson:

    […] I think this executive order is so bad and so poisoned and its genesis is so bad and terrible that he [Trump] ought to just throw it in the trash can.

    First reason, it doesn’t really make us safer. It doesn’t really focus on the areas where we really need to tighten up. […]

    It’s very easy to come to America from countries that we’ve always regarded as friendly. There are, I think, 27 of them. But these days there are would-be terrorists who have infiltrated places like Belgium and France, and they could come into this country much more easily than someone who’s a refugee from the seven countries the president mentioned. That needs real tightening up.” […]

    A religious ban just goes against the American grain. We believe in immigrants in this country, and we don’t believe in a religious test. And finally, it hurts us economically. When immigrants don’t come to this country, it hurts our job creation, our job growth. Silicon Valley is very worried that a lot of their jobs are going to have to go to Vancouver or Canada, where Canada has a much more forward looking immigration policy.

  310. says

    This is a followup to comment 430.

    A further response from Mark Cuban: “[…] isn’t it better for all of us that he [Trump] is tweeting rather than trying to govern?”

    In other news: more support for Trump, this time from Hezbollah, an group the U.S. has designated as a foreign terrorist organization:

    “We are very optimistic that when an idiot settles in the White House and boasts about his idiocy, this is the beginning of relief for the oppressed around the world,” Hezbollah’s Secretary General Hassan Nasrallah said in a speech Sunday […]

    http://bigstory.ap.org/13159a09a1af43f0818ae7d091178a64

  311. says

    The GOP celebrated the birthday of Abraham Lincoln by attributing a quote to Lincoln that cannot be attributed to Lincoln.

    “And in the end, it’s not the years in your life that count. It’s the life in your years.”

    The earliest use of that quote appears in an advertisement for a book published in 1947 (book by Edward J. Stieglitz).

  312. says

    Whoops. Comment 438 repeats a subject SC brought up in comment 436.

    Conclusion from both comments: Accuracy is not a virtue the GOP possesses.

    In other news, there are more signs of infighting within the Trump administration:

    […] The White House is showing not the amount of order that we need to see. I think there’s a lot of weakness coming out of the chief of staff,” Ruddy, the CEO of conservative Newsmax Media, said on CNN’s “Reliable Sources.”

    “I think Reince Priebus — good guy, well-intentioned — but he clearly doesn’t know how the federal agencies work. He doesn’t have a really good system.”

    Ruddy said Priebus doesn’t know how “the communications flow,” adding that he thinks White House press secretary Sean Spicer is doing a “very good job under difficult circumstances.”

    “But I do think the president’s not getting the backup he needs in the operation of the White House,” he said. […]

    Link

  313. says

    Schumer:

    I think this executive order is so bad and so poisoned and its genesis is so bad and terrible that he [Trump] ought to just throw it in the trash can.

    I agree with this. I’ve heard several people say that the appeals court ruling provided them a “road map” for how to fix it, but I read the decision and I’m not seeing it. The judges pointed to the extended evidence from the public record alone that it was targeted at Muslims and that the regime didn’t provide any rationale, classified or unclassified, for the countries or groups selected. It’s plain that the countries were chosen to try to exploit an earlier and completely different Obama policy to give a racial/religious ban the veneer of legality. They can’t go back in time and produce evidence of a specific threat that didn’t exist. Obviously if there was good intelligence about a specific threat they would have supplied it to the courts already. Any tweaked version will have the same origins,* and things could only get worse for them if they went into discovery (Giuliani and others deposed under oath, earlier drafts and related communications produced, lack of a security rationale and thus their lies about its existence exposed,…). I’m not a lawyer, but I don’t see how any version of this EO would succeed legally.

    * The 2015 campaign statement calling for “a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country’s representatives can figure out what is going on” is still up on his site.

  314. says

    “State G.O.P. Leaders Move Swiftly as Party Bickers in Congress”:

    …While Republicans in Washington appear flummoxed by the complexities of one-party rule, struggling with issues from repealing the Affordable Care Act, known as Obamacare, to paying for President Trump’s promised wall on the Mexican border, rising party leaders in the states seem far more at ease and assertive. Republicans have top-to-bottom control in 25 states now, holding both the governorship and the entire legislature, and Republican lawmakers are acting with lightning speed to enact longstanding conservative priorities.

    In states from New England to the Midwest and across the South, conservative lawmakers have introduced or enacted legislation to erode union powers and abortion rights, loosen gun regulations, expand school-choice programs and slash taxes and spending.

    Some Democrats fear that while their own party is consumed nationally with fighting Mr. Trump, leaders and activists may be too distracted to throw up effective roadblocks to the ideological agenda that Republicans are ramming through at the state level.

    “Progressives cannot afford to forget about what’s happening in our backyards,” said Nick Rathod, executive director of State Innovation Exchange, a Colorado-based liberal group focused on state legislatures. “Some of it is even more egregious than what is currently happening in Washington, D.C.”

    Republicans have gained power rapidly in the states since the 2008 presidential election, winning 33 governorships and in many instances entrenching themselves in power through legislative redistricting.

    Riding to office on a wave of discontent with the Obama administration,* headstrong governors in states like Wisconsin and Ohio embarked on a ferocious quest to transform their states, repeatedly battling powerful unions and popular backlash. Sidelining Democratic lawmakers and grinding down liberal interest groups, these Republicans may have helped pave the way for Mr. Trump’s victories in a string of traditionally blue Midwestern states last year.

    Democrats and labor unions, which in the past have been able to thwart conservative legislation with the help of a supportive governor or a bloc of allies in the legislature, describe the onslaught in newly Republican states as overwhelming.

    Democrats and their allies, including groups like Planned Parenthood, often have little recourse in these states but to rally popular outcry and organize for the next election, or to challenge Republican-enacted policies in court.

    In Iowa, a Democratic state senator, Janet Petersen, said the zeal of the new Republican majority had broken a mood of passivity among rank-and-file Democrats. On the Planned Parenthood issue alone, Ms. Petersen said her office had received about 1,500 emails from alarmed constituents.

    “If there’s one positive thing to come out of this horrible legislation,” she said, “it’s that complacency is gone.”

    * …a bundle of Koch loot, and the ALEC policy plant…

  315. says

    SC @443, holy fuck! Nightmarish. Miller was always thus, eh? I see that, like many rightwingers in training, he covers all the bases, including cluelessness about Hispanics, arrogance about himself and white men in general, anti-gay ignorance, and on and on.

  316. says

    SC @445, there are already some who did not survive Trump, including the Navy Seal that died in Yemen.

    In other news, 51% of Trump voters believe the “Bowling Green Massacre” was real.

    Asked by Public Policy Polling about Trump’s travel ban, which an appeals court refused to reinstate Thursday, 51 percent of Trump voters said “the Bowling Green Massacre shows why we need Donald Trump’s executive order on immigration.” Only 23 percent disagreed with the statement.

    For voters of the three other candidates in the 2016 election, Hillary Clinton, Gary Johnson and Jill Stein, the percentages of those who agreed with the statement were all in the single digits.

  317. says

    Followup to comments 425 and 431. (And sort of a followup to SC’s 443.)

    Trump liked the Stephen Miller show:

    Congratulations Stephen Miller- on representing me this morning on the various Sunday morning shows. Great job!

    One of the many outrageous things Miller said was:

    […] our opponents, the media, and the whole world will soon see, as we begin to take further actions, that the powers of the president to protect our country are very substantial and will not be questioned.

  318. says

    Followup to comments 320, 357 (SC), and 425.

    […] Trump has insisted since the election, without presenting any evidence, that he only lost the popular vote because millions of votes were illegally cast. But Trump expanded that unproven charge last week during a closed-door meeting with a group of senators, arguing that both he and Ayotte should have won the vote in New Hampshire […]

    “Let me as be unequivocal as possible-allegations of voter fraud in NH are baseless, without any merit-it’s shameful to spread these fantasies,” tweeted Tom Rath, a prominent New Hampshire Republican who worked on the presidential campaigns of former President George W. Bush and Mitt Romney. […]

    The Hill link

  319. says

    Trump’s approval ratings dropped again.

    […] Only 40 percent of Americans approve of the job that the president is doing, while 55 percent disapprove, according to the Gallup poll, which tracks the percentage of Americans who approve of disapprove of the job Trump is doing as president. […]

    Link

    That’s a new low. Trump began his presidency with a 45% approval rating, which was already low. Now he is even more unpopular.

  320. says

    This is all building to a crescendo and I fear the result. It can only go one of two ways I think. Either the GOP pulls it’s head out and dismantles this administration from the top down and rebuilds it, or we’re looking at a dictatorial regime where freedom of press is dead and dissenters will be killed or interned.

  321. says

    SC @455 (and erikthebassist), this is a part of that story that really raised red flags for me:

    […] Seemingly, Bikkannavar’s reentry into the country should not have raised any flags. Not only is he a natural-born US citizen, but he’s also enrolled in Global Entry — a program through CBP that allows individuals who have undergone background checks to have expedited entry into the country. He hasn’t visited the countries listed in the immigration ban and he has worked at JPL — a major center at a US federal agency — for 10 years. There, he works on “wavefront sensing and control,” a type of optics technology that will be used on the upcoming James Webb Space Telescope. […]

  322. says

    From SC’s link in comment 460:

    […] Two people with direct access to the White House leadership said Mr. Flynn was surprised to learn that the State Department and Congress play a pivotal role in foreign arms sales and technology transfers. So it was a rude discovery that Mr. Trump could not simply order the Pentagon to send more weapons to Saudi Arabia — which is clamoring to have an Obama administration ban on the sale of cluster bombs and precision-guided weapons lifted — or to deliver bigger weapons packages to the United Arab Emirates.

    Several staff members said that Mr. Flynn, who was a career Army officer, was not familiar with how to call up the National Guard in an emergency — for, say, a natural disaster like Hurricane Katrina or the detonation of a dirty bomb in an American city. […]

    Incompetence at all levels.

  323. says

    This is unconscionable and history will regard you as monsters:

    …After three weeks in the White House, Mr. Trump has made clear that he is going to continue promulgating conspiracy theories, flinging personal insults and saying things that are plainly untrue. And the Republican-controlled House and Senate seem to have made a collective decision: They will accommodate — not confront — his conduct as long as he signs their long-stalled conservative proposals on taxes, regulations and health care into law.

    “There’s a widely held view among our members that, yes, he’s going to say things on a daily basis that we’re not going to like,” said Senator John Thune of South Dakota, the third-ranking Senate Republican, “but that the broad legislative agenda and goals that we have — if we can stay focused on those and try and get that stuff enacted — those would be big wins.”

    Such accommodation is coming at a price, attracting incredulous or angry constituents to town hall meetings, leaving members flat-footed when presented with the latest presidential provocation and testing the capacity of now perpetually clogged phone lines on Capitol Hill….

    But at least for now, that is a price Republicans seem willing to pay. In effect, congressional Republicans have sought to compartmentalize Mr. Trump’s presidency, adopting a cafeteria-style approach….

    “He’s a unique personality, to be sure,” acknowledged Senator John Cornyn of Texas, the Republican whip. “But he’s gotten this far the way he is, and I think that probably leads him to think, well, it’s working for him so far, so why change?”

    And Republican lawmakers do not mind?

    “As long as we’re able to get things done,” Mr. Cornyn said.

    “I think we can get a lot done with the people around him,” Mr. McCain said, dismissing policy pronouncements from Mr. Trump that often differ from “the day before.”

    In hopes of repairing their relationship with Congress after the botched rollout of the travel ban, Mr. Trump’s aides have aggressively courted congressional Republicans. In addition to Mr. Pence with his weekly visits, Marc Short, Mr. Trump’s chief legislative liaison, has already become ubiquitous in the Capitol.

    And powerful senators are enjoying significant attention: Mr. McCain, the Armed Services Committee chairman, said he had already had three conversations with Michael T. Flynn, the national security adviser, and a breakfast with Jim Mattis, the defense secretary. Mr. Hatch, who is chairman of the Finance Committee, had a 90-minute meeting with Mr. Trump in the White House. And Mr. Alexander, the chairman of the health and education panel, was invited to the White House last Thursday for lunch with Mr. Trump.

    Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the majority leader, said there was “a high level of satisfaction” with the new White House, insisting that members cared little about “the daily tweets.”

    The deflection is bicameral….

  324. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    Re, the Oroville dam. From my parsing of the situation, the emergency spillway was developing a big gully near the top that had the potential to undermine a large bit of the dirt on the hill into the Feather River in big mudslide. The regular spillway hole is getting bigger, but isn’t likely to result in a mudslide. The water level in the lake was going down, and would soon be below the level to run into the emergency spillway, reducing the chance of a catastrophic mudslide. The lake level needs to be reduced to fix both spillways. Rain is on tap on and off for next week. They really aren’t out of the flood potential for a bit.

  325. says

    “When a Pillar of the Fourth Estate Rests on a Trump-Murdoch Axis”:

    …They are Rupert Murdoch — the founder of the corporate news media giants 21st Century Fox and the News Corporation — and President Trump.

    The Financial Times reported the latest example of their closeness last week: that Mr. Trump’s daughter Ivanka was a trustee of the nearly $300 million fortune Mr. Murdoch set aside for the two children he had with his third wife, Wendi, who arranged the trusteeship.

    Ms. Trump gave up that oversight role in December, before her father’s inauguration but well after Election Day.

    That means the whole time that Mr. Murdoch’s highly influential news organizations were covering Mr. Trump’s campaign and transition, their executive chairman was entangled in a financial arrangement of the most personal sort — tied to his children’s financial (very) well being — along with the president’s daughter.

    The latest news about the Murdoch-Trump axis is acutely problematic for the leadership at The Wall Street Journal — owned by News Corp. — as it seeks to quell a rebellion by a group of staff members who believe that the paper has held them back from more aggressively covering Mr. Trump, they suspect, under pressure from Mr. Murdoch. (As Joe Pompeo of Politico first reported last week, a meeting to discuss their grievances is to take place at The Journal on Monday.)

    But the relationship between the president and Mr. Murdoch has implications well beyond The Journal, given the global breadth of Mr. Murdoch’s media holdings, his history of putting them to use for political leaders who then help him with his own business needs and Mr. Trump’s own reactivity to the news media.

    How it all affects the rest of us depends on how powerfully Mr. Murdoch’s news media properties swing behind the new presidential agenda and how much criticism of Mr. Trump they’ll abide from their journalists and commentators. And all of that could depend on what Mr. Murdoch wants from the administration, and how badly he wants it….

  326. says

    “Congressman: Rarely used law could make Trump tax returns public”:

    A New Jersey congressman says a rarely invoked 1924 law could be used to examine President Donald Trump’s tax returns for possible conflicts of interest and Constitutional violations.

    Rep. Bill Pascrell, a Democrat who serves on the Ways and Means Committee, has asked the committee’s chairman, Rep. Kevin Brady of Texas, to order the Treasury Department to provide tax returns to the committee. Brady’s office did not respond to a request for comment Friday.

    After privately examining returns — Pascrell is seeking 10 years’ worth — the committee could decide to share them with the full House, which would in effect make them public. The 1924 law gives congressional committees that set tax policy the power to examine tax returns. It was used in 1974 when Congress looked at President Richard Nixon’s returns, and in 2014 when the Ways and Means Committee released confidential tax information as part of its investigation into the Internal Revenue Service’s handling of applications for nonprofit status.

    “If I get a ‘no’ answer on this, I’ll be very honest with you: If these guys think I’m walking away from this, they’re absolutely nuts,” Pascrell said. “The calls we’re getting, the calls other congressmen are getting, it’s unbelievable, we never expected this.”…

  327. says

    SC, I refuse to pay $10 a month for a single newspaper*. Any chance you can copy pasta the important bits from your 480?

    * I would pay a more reasonable fee. It’s digital. They could afford to make it lower, a few bucks a month maybe.

  328. What a Maroon, living up to the 'nym says

    ericthebassist,

    In short: Il Douchebag was discussing the NKorea missile launch with Abe at dinner in Mar-a-lago in front of everyone, while waiters and bussers were milling about doing their jobs. Because there were no electric lights in the room, aides were illuminating the documents they were reading with their cell phone flashlights.

    Such is the state of security in the current regime.

    (I pay for the dead tree version of the WaPo, so I get digital access included.)

  329. What a Maroon, living up to the 'nym says

    And I’m not sure if we should be horrified that the US Government is being run by such rank amateurs, or grateful that our gold-plated Mussolini is so incompetent.

  330. says

    eric @464

    Lynna – Do you think he was singled out because of his name or because of his job?

    My guess is his name caused the initial focus. But after they found out he was a a natural-born US citizen, and that he was also enrolled in Global Entry, why did they persist? And why did they demand to search his smart phone? He had not visited any of the seven countries on Trump’s no-no list.

    This just looks like immigration officers run amuck. I’ve heard other reports that claim reactionary/autocratic forces within federal agencies now feel emboldened to do whatever the fuck they like, thinking they can get away with it because … Trump.

  331. says

    SC @476, I notice that if there is pushback against Flynn from within the Trump administration it is more about the fact that he lied to his colleagues (apparently), and it is not about the fact that he was discussing the Obama sanctions against Russia with the Russian ambassador.

  332. says

    Thanks, What a Maroon. More detail:

    Why is this important? Mobile phones have flashlights, yes — and cameras, microphones and Internet connectivity. When Edward Snowden was meeting with reporters in Hong Kong at the moment he was leaking the material he’d stolen from the NSA, he famously asked that they place their phones in the refrigerator — blocking any radio signals in the event that the visitors’ phones had been hacked. This was considered the most secure way of ensuring that the phones couldn’t be used as wiretaps, even more secure than removing the battery. Phones — especially phones with their flashes turned on for improved visibility — are portable television satellite trucks and, if compromised, can be used to get a great deal of information about what’s happening nearby, unless precautions are taken.

    Precautions weren’t taken. One of DeAgazio’s photos shows Trump using a phone at the table, within view of other diners (and while sitting next to a foreign leader). It’s not clear what phone Trump is using in that picture, but it’s known that he uses a relatively old Android device, even while serving as president. As we noted last week, Trump generally uses that device when he’s not in the middle of a work day. Shortly before the dinner with Abe, he tweeted from it….

    The problem is that Trump’s Android phone would be very simple to hack to provide precisely the sort of access described above.

    That’s just one of the phones that may have been at the table for the conversation….

  333. says

    This is a followup to comment 385, and to SC’s earlier mention of the girl in the pink dress.

    The video shows ten-year-old Hannah Bradshaw asking Jason Chaffetz a question at the Salt Lake City townhall. She asked:

    What are you doing to help protect our water and air for our generations and my kids’ generations?

    Do you believe in science? Because I do.

    The video also shows Chaffetz giving an evasive answer, for which the audience boos him.

    Scroll down to watch the video on Think Progress.

    Chaffetz also said some stupid stuff and not just some vague stuff. For example, he said that Democrats support “solar farms” that are “destroying wildlife.” Data shows that coal is the biggest killer of wildlife in the energy-production industry.

  334. microraptor says

    Salty Current @469:

    Wow, it’s almost like that’s exactly what some liberals were predicting would happen if Trump got elected.

  335. says

    “How Trump can be held accountable for violating the Constitution, even if Congress doesn’t care”:

    Among legal scholars, there isn’t much debate: President Trump is violating the Constitution.

    Since Trump decided to retain full ownership of his business empire, he has been receiving a stream of payments from foreign governments, which is prohibited by Article 1, Section 9 of the Constitution.

    The trickier question is how to hold Trump accountable.

    An obscure legal tactic that dates back to 1189 could be used to hold Trump accountable for illegal acts without involving Congress, Jed Shugerman, a professor at Fordham University Law School, tells ThinkProgress.

    Shugerman’s approach stems from one important legal concept: Incorporation is a privilege afforded by the state, but to maintain corporate status, one must conduct business legally.

    State attorneys general have the power to bring actions against corporations, something known as a “Quo Warranto” proceeding, to determine whether the corporations are a conduit for illegal activity. This is known as a corporation acting “ultra vires” or beyond its legal authority. In this case, the proceeding would determine whether Trump’s corporate entities are being used as a conduit for illegal emoluments to Trump.

    Importantly, the case would involve a public official (a state attorney general) suing a private entity (the Trump Organization). This means standing would be on much firmer ground.

    In many states, Quo Warranto authority has been explicitly provided to the state attorney general by statute. In New York, for example, the attorney general has the authority to bring such an action against a corporation under New York Business Corporation Law § 1101:…

    If successful, the remedies in such a proceeding are “revoking or dissolving the corporate charter, enjoining it from exercising the illegal activity, and/or imposing a financial penalty on the corporation.”

    In the case of Trump, that could mean enjoining the Trump organization from doing business with foreign governments, requiring that Trump divest from certain assets, or completely dissolving the Trump corporation.

    The proceeding could involve discovery and significant disclosures by Trump, including his tax returns and how much business he does with foreign governments….

  336. What a Maroon, living up to the 'nym says

    Chaffetz has more important things to do, like undermining democracy in the nation’s capital.

    Rep. Jason Chaffetz, a Utah Republican who opposes the District’s new assisted-suicide law, says he will move forward in committee on overturning the measure, setting up what could be a rare House floor vote to nullify a local District law.

  337. What a Maroon, living up to the 'nym says

    Not to mention states’ rights.

    Oh, that’s right, DC isn’t a state. No rights for you!

  338. tomh says

    @ #492

    One problem with all the machinations to ensnare Trump in the Emoluments Clause, is that Congress can negate them by simply passing legislation allowing his business interests. The wording of the Clause itself prohibits payments “without the consent of Congress.” Exceptions have been made in the past and it would be easy for this Republican Congress to make an exception for Trump, which they would undoubtedly do if it became necessary.

  339. says

    From the Washington Post:

    The White House continues to provide zero evidence to back up its claims of voter fraud. Officials instead retreat to the same bogus talking points that have been repeatedly shown to be false.

    It’s pretty ridiculous to cite research in a way that even the researcher says is inappropriate, and yet Miller keeps saying 14 percent of noncitizens are registered to vote. The Republican governor of New Hampshire has admitted that he was wrong to say buses of illegal voters voted in the election, and yet Miller shamelessly suggests that is the case. Miller cites a supposed expert on voter fraud, Kobach, who has been mocked for failing to prove his own claims of voter fraud. Miller also repeats a claim about people being registered to vote in two states, even though that is not an example of voter fraud.

    Miller earns Four Pinocchios — over and over again. [The Washington Post, 2/12/17]

  340. says

    Just what we don’t need. Some Republicans want to defund organizations that monitor and prevent nuclear-weapons test.

    […] S. 332, the bill filed by Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR), would “restrict funding for the preparatory commission for the comprehensive nuclear-test-ban treaty.” Rep. Joe Wilson of South Carolina, also a Republican, has proposed a companion resolution.

    The effect of the bill, were it to become law, would be to strip away potentially all of the roughly $30 million the United States provides annually to the Vienna-based Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization, which employs 260 people from 70 countries. The U.S. contribution accounts for around a quarter of the commission’s yearly budget.

    The commission runs a global network of 337 nuclear monitoring stations to help enforce the treaty’s ban on atomic explosions. The ban “makes it very difficult for countries to develop nuclear bombs for the first time, or for countries that already have them, to make more powerful bombs,” the commission explains on its website. […]

    “Any move by the United States toward reducing commitment to the CTBT or resuming nuclear testing would without doubt trigger similar actions in other nuclear weapon states,” Hans Kristensen, the director of the Nuclear Information Project at the Federation of American Scientists in New York City, told The Daily Beast. “Such a development would undermine U.S. national security and international efforts to restrain nuclear weapons development.”

    The Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty was one of the crowning achievements of international nuclear disarmament efforts during the Cold War. Negotiators hammered out the treaty between 1994 and 1996. One hundred eighty-three countries subsequently signed the treaty and 164 ratified it, including nuclear powers France, Russia, and the United Kingdom. […]

    Daily Beast link

  341. says

    More on the Republican effort to defund the commission that monitor’s the planet for atomic tests (following up on comment 499):

    […] Wilson [Rep. Joe Wilson of South Carolina] insisted his bill wouldn’t make Americans less safe. “This bill will leave in place only the funding for the international monitoring system aspect of the preparatory commission—which improves our global nuclear detection capability,” he said. “Nuclear deterrence is a critical part of protecting American families, and this legislation protects that capability.”

    But that’s not true. All the commission does is monitor the planet for atomic tests. If you defund the commission, you defund the monitoring, too—they’re one and the same. “The international monitoring system that’s part of the [test-ban organization] feeds back into an international data center,” Jeffrey Lewis, a nuclear nonproliferation expert at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey, told The Daily Beast. “So they’re not going to fund the people who read the computer screens when the data comes in?”

    Lewis said Cotton and Wilson’s bill is, in part, a thinly veiled attack on the pro-ban United Nations, another institution Trump has attacked. “Can you imagine hating the U.N. so much that you’re willing to kick yourself in your own nuts?” Lewis said. “This is madness.” […]