Everyone and their mother is sending me a link to this flickr set, via Boing Boing, of something called “cephalerotica”. I just don’t know…there are all these clumsy mammals inserted into the art that distract from the erotic part.
There are cephalopods in those pictures? Goes back and takes yet another look …
Oh, yeah, I guess there are.
God Retardentsays
Reminds me of an old sea song
Once I saw an octopus
out in the deep blue sea
I called out , “Miss. Octopus,
Won’t you play with me?”
Then out came her tentacles,
very long and straight
Oh my goodness,
eight ways to masturbate!
I saw that on Boing Boing last night and said to myself, “Quick! PZ must be informed!” And then I wised up and said (again to myself; no one else is here), “Wait a minute, everyone and his aunt will be sending this to his attention.” I never for a moment suspected it would be mothers instead. (My mom would never send you naughty pictures like that.)
I’ll never be able to look at a squid in the same way again…or eat one… ;-)
Quidamsays
I think a more accurate description would be necrocephalerotica.
Draping dead mollusks over female mammals improves the appearance of neither
mayhempixsays
I saw it at Boing Boing too… but knew you would get plenty of notice from the other godless immoral atheists.
Cruithnesays
would those pictures be classified as Vagina Tentata?
Oh, please yourselves.
Anyway, I guess it takes all sorts. Anyone remember Alan Moore’s wonderful creation the little pervert space alien called Zirk ?
Zirk had a real fetish for tentatcled things that thrashed!
clinteassays
dead mollusks over female mammals
Beats the title of my favourite music album,”Red Skies over Paradise”
Draping dead mollusks over female mammals improves the appearance of neither
@clinteas #3: Well, it’s not like I have a problem with nudity. The owner of the photostream just needs to reclassify them so they don’t appear under the default “family-friendly” filter. It’s not like he’ll have to take them down. (I’m assuming he holds the copyright to those images when I say that.)
I post some far more explicit stuff on my stream, but I abide by Flickr’s TOS when I do it. If he doesn’t like the rules, there are other places to host images.
Eclogitesays
Poor dead octopi. :-(
Shamarsays
If you stare at the pictures long enough….you might notice some cephalopods in the pictures too! It might be too hard to get your mind off of the girls to notice though.
clinteassays
NBWAW,
fair enough,that would seem easy to do.
there are other places to host images.
I always took you for a Deviant Art person anyway..:-)
“A ‘NSFW’ tag is a courtesy, and I’m surprised that PZ didn’t add one to this post.”
Yeah, because simply referring to a link to flickr photos as being a form or erotica wasn’t enough warning.
Susansays
Hmph. As I expected: Too much rape porn, not enough naked male mammals.
Sastrasays
Very lovely, though I couldn’t help imagining the possible reactions of some of the poor models when informed about the nature of the shot:
“Ok, here, put this on.” “What the hell is that??!!” “Look, it’s artistic, okay? It probably doesn’t bite, I don’t think those are teeth or anything. We’ll snap it real quick.”
#12: Definitely NSFW, but I believe that is pretty well inferred in the intro.
I infer that you should have said “implied” there.
JM Inc.says
Oh, PZ, we didn’t know you were into hentai. Whatever does the old trophy wife think, hmmm?
Lsuomasays
Cephaloporn has a long and honorable history, and one of the masters of Japanese art was producing much hotter stuff many, many years ago. For example (this may be NSFW (where W==work or wowsers)):
It is perhaps arguable that that phrase could be construed something like “…it is pretty well [to be] inferred [from the material contained] in the intro.” As long as TF receives the generous benefit of the doubt.
One of the images on “The Award-winning Cephalopoda Erotica Thread” seems to be an image by artist of nature Glen Loates of a sperm whale hunting squid.
jpfsays
Chances are this has already been linked to in some other comment, but here’s a great Japanese ad for, I’m guessing, some sort of topical ointment for octopuses.
Jessesays
Awww, it’s telling me the page is private! Anyone help?
I can’t view the flickr set, first it forced me to create an identity, now it says that photo set is “private”. I wish people would avoid user-hostile photo sites.
Zarsays
Octopus up the butt. Ow ow ow ow ow.
Twin-Skiessays
*Yawn*
Urutsukudoji
Words Worth
La Blue Girl
Need I say more?
Levi in NYsays
No way to see them without signing up for a Yahoo account?
God Retardent says
WOW!! What a beautiful Octo-Pussy on the one girl,I wonder what function the tentacles perform?
Ignorant Atheist says
Is porn using seafood called “prawn?” ;)
clinteas says
Im very disappointed that NBWAW even wants to report this to the flickr overlords.
Cant see anything wrong with it at all,NSFW,meh….
'Tis Himself says
I agree with PZed, all the mammals are quite unnecessary for enjoyment of the cephalerotica.
Stephen says
I’ll be honest, my attention is mostly on the mammals.
Sven DiMilo says
A few of those mammals look…OK…to me. Some fine octopuses too.
MH says
@clinteas
We might not see anything wrong with it, but an employer might. A ‘NSFW’ tag is a courtesy, and I’m surprised that PZ didn’t add one to this post.
blf says
There are cephalopods in those pictures?
Goes back and takes yet another look …
Oh, yeah, I guess there are.
God Retardent says
Reminds me of an old sea song
Once I saw an octopus
out in the deep blue sea
I called out , “Miss. Octopus,
Won’t you play with me?”
Then out came her tentacles,
very long and straight
Oh my goodness,
eight ways to masturbate!
Zeno says
I saw that on Boing Boing last night and said to myself, “Quick! PZ must be informed!” And then I wised up and said (again to myself; no one else is here), “Wait a minute, everyone and his aunt will be sending this to his attention.” I never for a moment suspected it would be mothers instead. (My mom would never send you naughty pictures like that.)
LaTomate says
Mea culpa, I could not resist.
Tim Fuller says
Definitely NSFW, but I believe that is pretty well inferred in the intro.
Bets on how long these are still up on Flickr?
Enjoy.
Doubting Foo says
I’ll never be able to look at a squid in the same way again…or eat one… ;-)
Quidam says
I think a more accurate description would be necrocephalerotica.
Draping dead mollusks over female mammals improves the appearance of neither
mayhempix says
I saw it at Boing Boing too… but knew you would get plenty of notice from the other godless immoral atheists.
Cruithne says
would those pictures be classified as Vagina Tentata?
Oh, please yourselves.
Anyway, I guess it takes all sorts. Anyone remember Alan Moore’s wonderful creation the little pervert space alien called Zirk ?
Zirk had a real fetish for tentatcled things that thrashed!
clinteas says
Beats the title of my favourite music album,”Red Skies over Paradise”
i would have to agree.
Naked Bunny with a Whip says
@clinteas #3: Well, it’s not like I have a problem with nudity. The owner of the photostream just needs to reclassify them so they don’t appear under the default “family-friendly” filter. It’s not like he’ll have to take them down. (I’m assuming he holds the copyright to those images when I say that.)
I post some far more explicit stuff on my stream, but I abide by Flickr’s TOS when I do it. If he doesn’t like the rules, there are other places to host images.
Eclogite says
Poor dead octopi. :-(
Shamar says
If you stare at the pictures long enough….you might notice some cephalopods in the pictures too! It might be too hard to get your mind off of the girls to notice though.
clinteas says
NBWAW,
fair enough,that would seem easy to do.
I always took you for a Deviant Art person anyway..:-)
Naked Bunny with a Whip says
Yeah, I think I use Flickr just because I already have an account due to using Yahoo Mail.
Naked Bunny with a Whip says
Grammar fail, Nakie Buns. -_-
Craig says
“A ‘NSFW’ tag is a courtesy, and I’m surprised that PZ didn’t add one to this post.”
Yeah, because simply referring to a link to flickr photos as being a form or erotica wasn’t enough warning.
Susan says
Hmph. As I expected: Too much rape porn, not enough naked male mammals.
Sastra says
Very lovely, though I couldn’t help imagining the possible reactions of some of the poor models when informed about the nature of the shot:
“Ok, here, put this on.” “What the hell is that??!!” “Look, it’s artistic, okay? It probably doesn’t bite, I don’t think those are teeth or anything. We’ll snap it real quick.”
Enshoku says
I bet anything that those images had something to do with Japan in some way…
BlindRobin says
sex and food…
always a good match
PennyBright says
Oy. Poor dead octopuses indeed. Conceptually interesting, but bestiality is questionable enough – necrophiliac bestiality even more so.
IMHO, tentacle porn should stay safely in the realms of hentai.
tripwire says
Now it’s only a matter of time before everyone starts sending their Japanese tentacle rape anime to PZ…
Larry says
PZ,
Which pic are you using for your screensaver??
Zeno says
I infer that you should have said “implied” there.
JM Inc. says
Oh, PZ, we didn’t know you were into hentai. Whatever does the old trophy wife think, hmmm?
Lsuoma says
Cephaloporn has a long and honorable history, and one of the masters of Japanese art was producing much hotter stuff many, many years ago. For example (this may be NSFW (where W==work or wowsers)):
The Dream of the Fisherman’s Wife
Tim Fuller says
Infer or imply? You’re probably smarter than me on the exact usage, but since I used it the way I did, it is totally acceptable.
When I do it, it’s not an abuse of the language…..and yes I just finished watching Frost/Nixon.
Enjoy.
Monado says
The whole account is gone, anyway.
AdamK says
It is perhaps arguable that that phrase could be construed something like “…it is pretty well [to be] inferred [from the material contained] in the intro.” As long as TF receives the generous benefit of the doubt.
o|o says
“brookelynn23 is no longer active on Flickr”
That didn’t take long….
Chat says
chat
thank`s
JeffreyD says
To all who have said it is down, I just accessed it via PZed’s link above.
Interesting.
Ciao
Moody834 says
@Tim Fuller (#35):
“Infer or imply?”
Imply… or implode?
MH says
The Flickr set has been deleted, but apparently all of the photos were taken from this 39 page thread.
NSFW, of course.
Longtime Lurker says
Cant see anything wrong with it at all,NSFW,meh…
There’s a difference between prudery and prudence.
Sure, we may not be perturbed by these pictures, but maybe our human resource departments would be. A tag is all we desire.
Monado says
One of the images on “The Award-winning Cephalopoda Erotica Thread” seems to be an image by artist of nature Glen Loates of a sperm whale hunting squid.
jpf says
Chances are this has already been linked to in some other comment, but here’s a great Japanese ad for, I’m guessing, some sort of topical ointment for octopuses.
Jesse says
Awww, it’s telling me the page is private! Anyone help?
Cactus Wren says
There is brief cephalerotic imagery in this commercial.
melior says
I can’t view the flickr set, first it forced me to create an identity, now it says that photo set is “private”. I wish people would avoid user-hostile photo sites.
Zar says
Octopus up the butt. Ow ow ow ow ow.
Twin-Skies says
*Yawn*
Urutsukudoji
Words Worth
La Blue Girl
Need I say more?
Levi in NY says
No way to see them without signing up for a Yahoo account?
I’ll pass, then.
Richard Walker says
The Flickr set’s been pulled, the author chimed in on BoingBoing and pointed to a place the naughtiness continues:
http://wurzeltod.ch/wurzelforum/index.php?topic=50.0