How about giving someone you love a Molly for Squidmas?


It’s that time of the month again — it’s time to confer upon some worthy commenter the December 2007 Order of the Molly award. Just leave a comment here naming your favorite person on Pharyngula, and I’ll see that they get added to the distinguished ranks.

Comments

  1. J Myers says

    raven. The vitriol is mesmerizing.

    Can we also have a monthly recognition for abject stupidity? I have a nomination for that one, too.

  2. pfc says

    (Long time lurker coming out here…)

    Dustin++! He often makes me laugh, which would surely be a qualifying trait. Unfortunately most of my other potential nominees have already won.

    As for abject stupidity, who would that be named after? There’s too many choices… Order of D’Souza? Order of Dembski? The Knights of Columbus?

  3. J Myers says

    D’Order of D’Souza would work.

    Are you really lurker? Seems like I’ve seen those initials here before…

  4. N.Wells says

    Cuttlefish for:

    I agree, and I’m glad that you said it
    It’s important to know how to edit
    Squeeze your thoughts in a vise
    Be precise and concise,
    And remember that sometimes, writing more than what’s needed is not likely to be the right thing to do to get you additional credit.

  5. Bride of Shrek says

    I vote for Dustin, the current popular boy in the class. For consistent wit, logic and all round grammatical correctness (plus Mr Shrek sometimes makes him sick which means we have something in common).

  6. says

    I’d like to nominate Ken Cope. He’s got an interesting background and always has something interesting to say. We’ve crossed swords in the past and I’ve found myself nodding in agreement even when the zingers were at my expense. Whenever I see one of his posts I always read it, no matter what the topic, and I’m never disappointed.

  7. John Phillips says

    Maxi, a person after my own heart as I have thought her worthy of one for quite some time. For Bride Of Shrek’s posts invariably leave me with either a silly grin, an out and out belly laugh or a nod to her perspicacity. As you say, funny, lucid and clever posts, awesome lady and I envy Shrek :)

  8. David Marjanović, OM says

    I’m not unhappy with Dustin or Bride of Shrek, but I’d like to bring Helioprogenus (the Son of the Sun) and noncarborundum (who has read the original Klingon!) to the collective attention.

  9. David Marjanović, OM says

    I’m not unhappy with Dustin or Bride of Shrek, but I’d like to bring Helioprogenus (the Son of the Sun) and noncarborundum (who has read the original Klingon!) to the collective attention.

  10. Physicalist says

    Blake Stacey gets my vote this month, for doing P.Z.’s dirty work, and with amusing style:

    Let me say that again, for those in the back row: photons are massless. They have no mass. Their mass is not pinin’ for the fjords. It is non-existent.

  11. Sili says

    Blake Stacey as per Physicalist.

    I’d also like to suggest Peter Irons for an Honorary Molly (HOM?) for his wit, intelligence and diligence.

  12. Pyre says

    Physicalist @ 17: But take back one kadam because photons do have mass.

    They have no rest mass… but then they’re not at rest, are they? They move, they’re energy, and there’s some sort of equation (it’ll come to mind presently) with energy on one side and mass on the other, and, oh yes, I think the velocity of photons even comes into it. Something like “m = E/c^2”? Which suggests that, unless E=0, m may be very small but not 0.

  13. Pyre says

    J Myers @ 20: The problem is that Blake said that in the context of “Relativity”, which makes “relativistic mass” relevant.

  14. Sastra, OM says

    I’ll nominate Glen D again, because it’s getting to be a bad habit.

    And I’m bringing in windy, Tulse, and Bill Dauphin. All consistently good, and sometimes very good indeed.

    And then I’m stopping, but it’s not because I can’t come up with others, it’s because it’s too easy to overindulge on the holidays…

  15. says

    There are quite a few commenters who’ve really come into their own this month.

    But Dustin’s been long deserving, and he gets my vote this month too.

  16. says

    The Molly thread is really slow. Why is that? Perhaps commenters aren’t that inclined to pat each other on the back. Or, more likely (I think), most people skim through comments, laughing or snorting or groaning, without paying much attention to whose bons mots they are perusing. Well, it’s a busy life and not everyone has time to stop and smell the bylines.

    I’m sure PZ thought the Squidmas reference would pack the people in, but maybe next time something like “Sex! Lies! Mollies!” would bring more marks into the tent.

    Oh, and despite some other worthwhile suggestions in this thread, I’m hanging in there for Dustin.

  17. says

    #17 Physicalist,

    That, as I recall, was in reply to my proposal regarding where mass comes from. A bit of mental wandering on my part it’s true, but it sounds cool. :)

    Of course, if they discover the Higgs Boson at the Large Hadron Collider my idea is pretty much toast.

  18. David Marjanović, OM says

    qatlho’qu’. SuvwI’ quv SoHba’.

    nuqjatlh?

    I know how to pronounce it (as far as the contradictory descriptions allow…), but that’s it. Whatever you said is not an Everyday Klingon Phrase. There is no dictionary online because Okrand and Paramount prefer selling theirs on paper…

    Is wI’ a nominalizer…?

  19. David Marjanović, OM says

    qatlho’qu’. SuvwI’ quv SoHba’.

    nuqjatlh?

    I know how to pronounce it (as far as the contradictory descriptions allow…), but that’s it. Whatever you said is not an Everyday Klingon Phrase. There is no dictionary online because Okrand and Paramount prefer selling theirs on paper…

    Is wI’ a nominalizer…?

  20. Christianjb says

    Raven. Even though I think we disagree on a lot (to be honest I can’t remember). Raven’s done some good posts on Texas related threads.

  21. Rey Fox says

    Too late? Oh well, my votes rarely win, but I shouldn’t vote in such a cynical spirit. That being said, and though it’s unlikely that anyone will see this post, I vote for Owlmirror this month.

  22. CG in Tucson says

    All these nominees are excellent commenters, but I’d like to put in a word for Humbert if I may. His latest on the Coulter thread is typically good.