This week on the Evangelical Realism blog, we wrap up a very confused Chapter 6 with a look at how Christians can use an equivocal definition of “objective morality” to trick people into substituting a superstition-based morality for a reality-based one.
I noticed this part of the linked discussion:
that’s the problem through and through with talking to theists. They won’t define their terms and they won’t use them consistently.
QualiaSoup just came out with a video addressing Craig’s Chapter 6