The debate between Jon Stewart and Bill O’Reilly below the fold in its entirety. Stewart is magnificent as usual, but what’s interesting is Billo’s perfomance. This is a great example of right-wing misinformation tactics. Apply ‘principles’ arbitrarily based on ideology, change the subject when cornered, attack when really cornered, lie your ass off and hope you don’t get called on it. Obama would be well served to observe this carefully.
Oct 08 2012
The debate you may not have seen
This post has no tag
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
About the Author
Freethought Blogs
- A Citizen of Earth
- A Million Gods
- Ace of Clades
- Alethian Worldview
- Almost Diamonds
- Ashley Miller
- Biodork
- Black Skeptics
- Blag Hag
- Brute Reason
- Butterflies and Wheels
- Comradde PhysioProffe
- Dispatches from the Culture Wars
- En Tequila Es Verdad
- Greta Christina's Blog
- Heteronormative Patriarchy for Men
- Lousy Canuck
- Mano Singham
- Maryam Namazie
- Near-Earth Object
- No Country for Women
- NonStampCollector
- Pharyngula
- Reasonable Doubts
- Richard Carrier Blogs
- Rock Beyond Belief
- Sincerely, Natalie Reed
- The Atheist Experience
- The Crommunist Manifesto
- The Digital Cuttlefish
- The Indelible Stamp
- The Zingularity
- This Week in Christian Nationalism
- Token Skeptic
- YEMMYnisting
- Zinnia Jones
PostsCommentsArchives
Recent Posts
- We don’t need no sinking regulations
- The glory & structure of planetary nebula
- Pope gives atheism a nod
- Fundie nutcases hack up UK soldier in the name of Allah
- What others say about FTB
- Newest pics of Saturn and system
- Needless to say, dixie wingnuts love them some E. W. Jackson
- An atheist tornado survivor!
- Humans “benefited” from climate change is a dicey way to say it
- IRS hearing tomorrow has what conservatives crave
Recent Comments
- leftwingfox on We don’t need no sinking regulations
- evilDoug on We don’t need no sinking regulations
- stever on We don’t need no sinking regulations
- Marcus Ranum on We don’t need no sinking regulations
- Reginald Selkirk on We don’t need no sinking regulations
FTB RecentFTB Active
FTB Recent
- Pope Reaches Out to the Damned by Sastra
- From an optics point of view by Ophelia Benson
- Lionel Richie Was The Motherfucken Sax Player!?!?!?!? by Comradde PhysioProffe
- On Useful and Not-So-Useful Definitions of Racism by Miri, Professional Fun-Ruiner
- Call Me Crazy, But... by Cuttlefish
- What happened to Toronto? by Mano Singham
FTB Active
- [Lounge #419] by PZ Myers
- Open thread on episode #814 by heicart
- Intersectionality? It's been a privilege by Ally Fogg
- Taking it Personally: Privilege and Women in Secularism by Ashley F. Miller
- #RDFbullies by Ophelia Benson
- Vacula v. Silverman by Stephanie Zvan

6 comments
Skip to comment form ↓
baal
October 8, 2012 at 11:32 am (UTC -6) Link to this comment
The vid is no longer available on the above link (oct 8 @ 1:30 EST). I think they were doing it for charity ($5) and it makes sense that they are limiting the ‘free’ distribution.
sc_b3852da0511075db84e787440ae4d8ec
October 8, 2012 at 12:00 pm (UTC -6) Link to this comment
There are some other copies out there, they are still alive
http://youtu.be/fefyHZG0mw8
http://youtu.be/uZpGyzCfwdg ,
NateHevens
October 8, 2012 at 8:18 pm (UTC -6) Link to this comment
Watching it right now. I purchased tickets to watch it online live. It was AWESOME!
So I’m watching it again.
:D
I’d offer to upload it for people, but a) much of the proceeds are going to charity and b) I don’t know how visible these forums are, and I don’t want to get into trouble.
Email me, however, and we can work something out…
Or… you know… you could go to http://www.therumble2012.com/ and spend the measly $5 to download the video. It’s worth-it. Trust me.
Stewart tears O’Reilly a new hole. Honestly… if the first Presidential debate had gone like this (Romney being O’Reilly, Obama being Stewart), not only would Obama have won, but there’d be no need for any other debate or even an election… it’d be a lock.
StevoR
October 9, 2012 at 11:53 pm (UTC -6) Link to this comment
@2. sc_b3852da0511075db84e787440ae4d8ec :
Nup. Getting nothing but a “This video has been removed by the user” message.
Damn. Wanted to see that. :-(
StevoR
October 9, 2012 at 11:55 pm (UTC -6) Link to this comment
@3.NateHevens :
From all I gather it already is. Obama should win easily.
Is there really – has there ever been really any “need” for the presidential “debates”?
Stevarious, Public Health Problem
October 10, 2012 at 11:26 am (UTC -6) Link to this comment
In anything resembling a fair race, yes. However, Republican voter registration fraud is massive and so far, seems likely to be massively effective. It doesn’t matter if millions more want to vote for Obama if millions of Obama voters get turned away at the polls, and Republicans have very clearly demonstrated that they hate democracy.