Fatwa demands isolation and 101 lashings for 16 year old rape victim »« School bans the dictionary because it’s too sexual

Over 100 Russians hospitalized after drinking holy water

This is yet another example of what can happen when people ignore scientific facts for superstitions. The Orthodox Christian holiday of Epiphany was January 19, and the Russian Orthodox have an interesting superstition that goes along with it:

The Holy Spirit, coming down upon the water, changes its natural properties. It becomes incorrupt, that is, it does not spoil, remains transparent and fresh for many years, receives the grace to heal illnesses, to drive away demons and every evil power, to preserve people and their dwellings from every danger, to sanctify various objects whether for church or home use.

Yep, God is apparently so good at water purification, he changes its natural properties…whatever that means. The Russian Orthodox take this very seriously:

People line up in churches to fill their bottles with the holy water which is believed to have a curative effect. Many defy sub-zero temperatures and take a dip in an ice hole to cleanse themselves of sins and take advantage of the heath-giving properties of Epiphany water as it is thought that any water on this day, be it tapped water or a pond, becomes baptismal. The number of “walruses” increases by the year. In Moscow, some 60,000 people are expected to enjoy Epiphany bathing. The holy water doesn’t spoil and therefore needn’t be kept in a fridge.

And what’s the result?

More than 100 Russian Orthodox believers have been hospitalized after drinking holy water during Epiphany celebrations in the eastern city of Irkutsk, an official said Monday.

A total of 117 people, including 48 children, were in the hospital complaining of acute intestinal pain after drinking water from wells in and around a local church last week, said Vladimir Salovarov, a spokesman for the Irkutsk Investigative Committee.

Salovarov said 204 people required some medical treatment after consuming the water, the source of which was a stagnant lake. He said, however, that it was too early to say what caused the illness.

You know what? I have a feeling they’ll discover that it’s caused by some sort of bacteria or parasite in the stagnant lake, not by the priest praying incorrectly.

While these sorts of studies are fun for giggling at people who hold ludicrous beliefs, they’re also useful. People often argue that religion and science occupy different realms of knowledge, and that science cannot test religious claims. That is totally false when religion claims to affect the natural world. Here’s a simple test:

1. Get water from a pond on January 18th (this is your control)
2. Let priest pray on it for Epiphany.
3. Collect water from the same pond on January 19th.
4. Make observations:

  • Have all (or any) of the microbes in the water been destroyed?
  • Has the concentration of harmful chemicals decreased?
  • When left out, does the control water spoil and the holy water not?
  • When administered to ill patients in a double blind study, does the holy water significantly increase their health? (Okay, maybe giving pond water to sick people isn’t ethical…)

5. Repeat at multiple water sources.

If my hypothesis that Science Wins is supported, that falsifies their religious claims. They are outright wrong. It’s not a matter of opinion, it’s not a separate magisterium, and it’s not something we should respect. It’s a false claim with consequences. How many adults and children need to get sick with scientific explanations before people give up their superstitions? How is it ethical for churches to be telling all of these people that it’s safe to drink from this water when it’s not?

Comments

  1. says

    I think this sort of story is useful as well for combating the argument “why do you get annoyed that other people have religion” : simple because it (can) create situations like this.I hope these guys get better.

  2. says

    I think this sort of story is useful as well for combating the argument "why do you get annoyed that other people have religion" : simple because it (can) create situations like this.

    I hope these guys get better.

  3. says

    Ah, but see the “separate magesterium” argument only works if one of the magesteria only makes claims that are unfalsifiable. The Russian Orthodox Church apparently didn’t get the memo that they were supposed to restrict their claims to things that can’t be empirically disproven, like souls or the existence of Heaven. When you make an empirical claim you’re treading into the magesteria of the scientist and you will be smacked around by empirical reality no matter who you are.

  4. says

    Ah, but see the "separate magesterium" argument only works if one of the magesteria only makes claims that are unfalsifiable. The Russian Orthodox Church apparently didn't get the memo that they were supposed to restrict their claims to things that can't be empirically disproven, like souls or the existence of Heaven. When you make an empirical claim you're treading into the magesteria of the scientist and you will be smacked around by empirical reality no matter who you are.

  5. says

    Reminds me of that joke about the three men and the holy water. You’ve probably heard it already but I’ll post it here (at least the version I know) in case others haven’t:Three men walk up to a priest to confess their sins. The priest asks the first man what he did. “I stole money from a bank.” The priest says, “Go, drink the holy water, and your sins are forgiven.” He asks the second man, “What is your sin?” The second man says “I stole a woman’s purse.” The priest again tells him to drink the holy water and his sins will be forgiven. The priest asks the third man, “What is your sin?” The man replies, “I peed in the holy water.”

  6. says

    Reminds me of that joke about the three men and the holy water. You've probably heard it already but I'll post it here (at least the version I know) in case others haven't:

    Three men walk up to a priest to confess their sins. The priest asks the first man what he did. "I stole money from a bank." The priest says, "Go, drink the holy water, and your sins are forgiven." He asks the second man, "What is your sin?" The second man says "I stole a woman's purse." The priest again tells him to drink the holy water and his sins will be forgiven. The priest asks the third man, "What is your sin?" The man replies, "I peed in the holy water."

  7. says

    You’re wrong Jen, religion and science had “separate magisterium”, religion belongs to the magisterium of phantasy, and science belongs to the magisterium of reality. If religion enters in the reality magisterium, science can argue against it.

  8. says

    You're wrong Jen, religion and science had "separate magisterium", religion belongs to the magisterium of phantasy, and science belongs to the magisterium of reality. If religion enters in the reality magisterium, science can argue against it.

  9. says

    Rofl, I didn’t even notice I included the ad because I have adblocker on. I thought you were hallucinating until someone else told me too.

  10. says

    Rofl, I didn't even notice I included the ad because I have adblocker on. I thought you were hallucinating until someone else told me too.

  11. Anonymous says

    Sorry, but where in the Bible does it say anything about holy water? It doesn't! Therefor the claim that water can be blessed by sinners (Catholics and Prodestents) and made clean by them is devilish and they are sinning for preaching false doctorines. No wonder we have so many lost people running arround beleaving these hercies. But JEN please do remember the righteous will judge the world in the end. The Saints will prevail…Rev.6:9-17 IN THE END WE WIN!

  12. Anonymous says

    Sorry, but where in the Bible does it say anything about holy water? It doesn’t! Therefor the claim that water can be blessed by sinners (Catholics and Prodestents) and made clean by them is devilish and they are sinning for preaching false doctorines. No wonder we have so many lost people running arround beleaving these hercies. But JEN please do remember the righteous will judge the world in the end. The Saints will prevail…Rev.6:9-17 IN THE END WE WIN!

  13. mcbender says

    re: Anonymous,

    Wow. Sometimes satire writes itself. Of course, Poe's Law being what it is, one never can tell…

  14. mcbender says

    re: Anonymous,Wow. Sometimes satire writes itself. Of course, Poe’s Law being what it is, one never can tell…

Leave a Reply