Alfred McCoy is a professor of history at the University of Wisconsin in Madison and the author of many books and articles on the nature of global power. He has written an article chronicling four legacy empires (France, Russia, China, and the US) and their declines.
He starts with France. The details of its colonial heyday were relatively unknown to me.
Let’s start with the French neocolonial imperium in northern Africa, which can teach us much about the way our world order works and why it’s fading so fast. As a comparatively small state essentially devoid of natural resources, France won its global power through the sort of sheer ruthlessness — cutthroat covert operations, gritty military interventions, and cunning financial manipulations — that the three larger empires are better able to mask with the aura of their awesome power.
For 60 years after its formal decolonization of northern Africa in 1960, France used every possible diplomatic device, overt and covert, fair and foul, to incorporate 14 African nations into a neo-colonial imperium covering a quarter of Africa that critics called Françafrique.
…From Paris’s perspective, the aim of the game was the procurement of cut-rate commodities — minerals, oil, and uranium — critical for its industrial economy. To that end, Foccart proved a master of the dark arts, dispatching mercenaries and assassins in covert operations meant to eternally maximize French influence.
…By 2020, however, nationalist consciousness against repeated transgressions of their sovereignty was rising in many of those relatively new countries, putting pressure on French forces to withdraw. As its troops were expelled from Mali, Niger, and Burkina Faso, Russia’s secretive Wagner Group of mercenaries moved in and, by 2023, had become increasingly active there. Just last month, the foreign minister of Chad announced that it was time for his country “to assert its sovereignty” by expelling French forces from their last foothold in the Sahel, effectively ending Françafrique after 60 years of neocolonial dominion.
In those same months, Chad also expelled a U.S. Special Forces training unit, while nearby Niger cancelled U.S. Air Force access to Air Base 201 (which it had built at a cost of $110 million), leaving Russia the sole foreign power active in the region.
He then looks at Vladimir Putin’s overreach that is leading to Russia’s declinee.
In recent weeks, however, Putin’s geopolitical construct suffered a serious blow when rebels suddenly swept into Damascus, sending Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad fleeing to Moscow and ending his family’s more than 50 years in power. After suffering a stunning 700,000 casualties and the loss of 5,000 armored vehicles in three years of constant warfare in Ukraine, Russia had simply stretched its geopolitical reach too far and no longer had sufficient aircraft to defend Assad. In fact, there are signs that Russia is pulling out of its Syrian bases and so losing a key pivot for power projection in the Mediterranean and northern Africa.
Meanwhile, as NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte condemned the “escalating campaign of Russia’s hostile actions” and its attempt to “crush our freedom and way of life,” Western Europe began ramping up its defense industries and cutting its economic ties to Russia. If Senator John McCain was right when, in 2014, he called Russia “a gas station masquerading as a country,” then the rapid switch to alternative energy across Eurasia could, within a decade, rob Moscow of the finances for further adventures, reducing Russia, now also harried by economic sanctions, to a distinctly secondary regional power.
He then takes on China, whose empire was less about territorial annexation and more about using its rapidly growing economic power to dominate countries and regions. But that growth has stalled leading to unrest, especially among the young.
But there are ample signs that its economic juggernaut may have reached its limits under a Communist command-economy. Indeed, it now appears that, in clamping an ever-tighter grip on Chinese society by pervasive surveillance, the Communist Party may be crippling the creativity of its talented citizenry.
After a rapid 10-fold expansion in university education that produced 11 million graduates by 2022, China’s youth unemployment suddenly doubled to 20% and continued climbing to 21.3% a year later.
…The country’s macroeconomic statistics are growing ever grimmer as well. After decades of rip-roaring growth, its gross domestic product, which peaked at 13%, has recently slumped to 4.6%… .. Seeking markets beyond its flagging domestic economy, China, which already accounted for 60% of global electric vehicle purchases, is launching a massive export drive for its cut-rate electric cars which is about to crash headlong into rising tariff walls globally.
…Even China’s daunting military may be a bit of a paper tiger. After years of cloning foreign weapons, Beijing’s arms exports have reportedly dropped in recent years after buyers found them technologically inferior and unreliable on the battlefield.
And finally he looks at the US.
When it comes to that other great imperial force on Planet Earth, let’s face it, Donald Trump’s second term is likely to mark the end of America’s near-century as the world’s preeminent superpower. After 80 years of near-global hegemony, there are arguably five crucial elements necessary for the preservation of U.S. world leadership: robust military alliances in Asia and Europe, healthy capital markets, the dollar’s role as the globe’s reserve currency, a competitive energy infrastructure, and an agile national security apparatus.
However, surrounded by sycophants and suffering the cognitive decline that accompanies aging, Trump seems determined to exercise his untrammeled will above all else. That, in turn, essentially guarantees the infliction of damage in each of those areas, even if in different ways and to varying degrees.
…Convinced above all else of his own “genius,” Trump seems destined to damage the key economic components of U.S. global power. With his inclination to play favorites with tariff exemptions and corporate regulation, his second term could give the term “crony capitalism” new meaning, while degrading capital markets. His planned tax cuts will add significantly to the federal deficit and national debt, while degrading the dollar’s global clout, which has already dropped significantly in the past four years.
In defiance of reality, he remains wedded to those legacy energy sources, coal, oil, and natural gas. In recent years, however, the cost of electricity from solar and wind power has dropped to half that of fossil fuels and is still falling. For the past 500 years, global power has been synonymous with energy efficiency. As Trump tries to stall America’s transition to green energy, he’ll cripple the country’s competitiveness in countless ways, while doing ever more damage to the planet.
When I step back and try to take a long view, it seems the US is in the state of late-stage monopolistic capitalism, where the productive energies unleashed by early competitive capitalism have been exhausted and all that is left is an eruption of giddy wealth accumulation by a few monopolists who pick over the decaying ruins of the decaying empire before the system crashes.
file thirteen says
Françafrique has been consigned to history for some time, so there’s no new perspective there. As for the other three “empires”, they’re not really empires like empires of the past were.
As regards Russia, the collapse of the USSR empire would have been a better subject for the article. After that, many countries that were formerly in the Warsaw pact or sitting on the fence did join NATO. NATO is not an empire though. The EU is more of an empire, but it’s not one that spreads by military action and it doesn’t demand that much from its members (well, from my outsider’s perspective). As the UK discovered, you can even leave it and go it alone without any hostile repercussions, but you may still wish you hadn’t.
McCain description of Russia “a gas station masquerading as a country” oversimplifies Russia’s vast resource wealth. Russia is in no danger of losing its clout anytime soon. A lot of us would like to see Russia dwindle into insignificance; I say, beware of wishful thinking. The attack on Ukraine was a wake up call. The media trumpets every small Ukraine gain, but not so much their losses. The war continues. Eventually the war will come to an end, and that may be soon once orange leader takes his throne and the US stops financing Ukraine’s war effort. The final border will not favour Ukraine; the only real question is how much land Ukraine will end up ceding.
Russia has revealed its true colours once again, if anyone still had any doubt. It will attack any country with a land border that it thinks it can beat; hell, it would attack China if it could win (it can’t). Not anyone in NATO or CSTO or OTS though. Where does that leave? Finland were smart and joined NATO. If I were Georgia I would look out.
China never really had an empire as such outside of China itself, but it did act all imperial-like when it took over Tibet. It does see Taiwan as its property, and that won’t change. Eventually Taiwan will become part of China one way or the other, but China are content to play the long game. Hong Kong can show how that might happen. China’s military force is massive, and how antiquated it might be is a subject of speculation. Taiwan only maintains its independence while China forbears.
It is fortunate that the disputed lands between China and India are so inhospitable. They can play war games, but neither really wants that territory, they just don’t want the other side there.
As for the US, like Russia, it joins in the collective ravishing of the Middle East, but I wouldn’t say the US has an empire. No country rules the Middle East. There has been fighting and raping of the Middle East since the dawn of time, and the introduction of Israel has guaranteed that that will continue long into the next century.
The US would have an empire if NATO became synonymous with the US -- that’s something for NATO members to be wary of. I can’t predict what will happen there, only that it’s certain that orange leader will look for ways to benefit from it. There’s been lots of speculation as to what orange leader will do with his next power trip. I would look at the last one for predictions, except that I expect even more self-serving and revenge stuff to happen. But what do you expect from a criminal.
So in summary, although the article has some food for thought, I don’t see it as particularly groundbreaking. The pertinent question is the one given at its end: “So, you might ask, if those four empires do crumble or even collapse, what comes next?” But there was no attempt to answer that.
sonofrojblake says
It’s going to be an interesting four years. Trump explicitly refused to rule out using military force to get what he wants. Invading Panama (or threatening to) is one thing -- it’s been done by the US before, in my lifetime -- but threatening to invade/take over Greenland is quite another. As of now, Greenland is essentially EU territory, albeit with an active independence movement. I’d be fascinated to see how a hostile US invasion of EU territory would go. I suspect it would go swimmingly for the US since the EU wouldn’t be belligerent/idiotic enough to put up anything approaching a fight, which Trump would simplistically (and correctly) interpret as weakness. And if the EU did put up a fight, Trump is stupid and dangerous enough to give them one, and I’m not convinced there’s anyone who could stop him, other than a mass decision by the armed forces to disregard orders of the commander in chief.
My mind then wanders to how much of a fight Denmark could put up… and whether it could count on any help from other EU nations… say, France, who would be able if highly unlikely to be inclined to lob up an SLBM or two pour discourager les autres. I can’t see it, but then four years ago I couldn’t see Trump being the candidate again, much less the actual president.
Hostile American troops, boots on the ground in Greenland without permission -- is anyone prepared to stick their neck out and say it won’t happen in the next four years? Not me.
Mano Singham says
file thirteen @#2,
Historian Daniel Immerwhar argues that the US does indeed have an empire but that it has been more successful in hiding it. I have written about his book How to Hide an Empire in several posts.